pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.10795 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Reaching diffraction-limited localization with coherent PTAs

Anna C. Tsai , Dylan L. Jow , Ue-Li Pen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords pulsar timing arraygravitational wavesangular resolutiondiffraction limitcoherent analysispulsar distancesmulti-messenger
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pulsar timing arrays reach diffraction-limited localization of gravitational-wave sources by incorporating precise pulsar distances.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Current pulsar timing array analyses overlook precise pulsar distance measurements and therefore cannot achieve the best possible angular resolution for individual gravitational-wave sources. This paper develops a coherent map-making technique that folds those distances into the timing model, reaching the theoretical diffraction limit of roughly 2 arc minutes for a source detected at signal-to-noise ratio of 10. That resolution is attainable with about nine well-timed pulsars and improves sharply as more precise distances become available. Such localization would allow searches for electromagnetic counterparts and multi-messenger follow-up of the sources.

Core claim

We present a coherent map-making technique that utilizes precise pulsar distance measurements to reach the diffraction-limited resolution of an individual source: δθ_diff ∼ (1/SNR)(λ_GW/r) ≈ 2 arcmin, where the SNR refers to the detection strength of the source. With this level of angular resolution, identifying an EM counterpart may become feasible, enabling multi-messenger follow-up. For SNR=10 the diffraction limit is reached with roughly 9 pulsars, and angular resolution scales sharply with the number of known pulsar distances as ∼ (1/SNR)^{N_dist/2}.

What carries the argument

The coherent map-making technique that incorporates precise pulsar distances into the timing model to achieve phase-coherent localization of a single gravitational-wave source.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes pulsar distances are known to sufficient precision and can be incorporated into the timing model without dominant systematic errors, while the gravitational wave is treated as a monochromatic plane wave from a single source.

What would settle it

A coherent analysis of simulated or real PTA data that incorporates the sub-parsec distance of PSR J0437-4715 yet fails to reduce localization uncertainty to approximately 2 arc minutes for a source at SNR=10.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.10795 by Anna C. Tsai, Dylan L. Jow, Ue-Li Pen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The real part of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. We consider a single, left-circularly polarized GW at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Current pulsar timing array (PTA) analyses do not take full advantage of pulsar distance information, thereby missing out on improved angular resolution and on a potential factor-of-two gain in detection sensitivity for individual gravitational-wave (GW) sources. In this work, we investigate the impact of precise pulsar distance measurements on angular resolution as an extension to previous work measuring the angular resolution of a dense, isotropic PTA [Jow et al., 2025]. We present a coherent map-making technique that utilizes precise pulsar distance measurements to reach the diffraction-limited resolution of an individual source: $\delta \theta_{\mathrm{diff}} \sim (1/\mathrm{SNR})(\lambda_{\mathrm{GW}}/r) \approx 2~\mathrm{arcmin}$, where the SNR refers to the detection strength of the source. With this level of angular resolution, identifying an EM counterpart may become feasible, enabling multi-messenger follow-up. We show that for $\rm SNR=10$, which may be the current sensitivity level using a coherent analysis, the diffraction limit is reached with roughly 9 pulsars. Moreover, angular resolution scales sharply with the number of known pulsar distances as $\sim (1/\mathrm{SNR})^{N_{\mathrm{dist}}/2}$. Thus, each additional pulsar with high signal-to-noise timing and precise distance measurement can improve PTA resolution by an order of magnitude. The distance to the best-timed millisecond pulsar (PSR J0437$-$4715) is already constrained to sub-parsec levels. We argue, therefore, that a coherent analysis of PTA data, fully incorporating pulsar distance information, is timely.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a coherent map-making technique for pulsar timing arrays that incorporates precise pulsar distance measurements to achieve diffraction-limited angular resolution for individual gravitational-wave sources. It derives a resolution formula δθ_diff ∼ (1/SNR)(λ_GW/r) ≈ 2 arcmin and shows that this limit is reached with roughly 9 pulsars at SNR=10, with angular resolution scaling as ∼ (1/SNR)^{N_dist/2}.

Significance. If the derivation remains valid once distance uncertainties are propagated, the result would mark a meaningful advance in PTA source localization, potentially enabling electromagnetic counterpart searches at arcminute scales. The scaling with the number of precise distance measurements is a notable strength, especially given existing sub-parsec constraints on pulsars such as PSR J0437−4715, and the work extends prior isotropic PTA resolution studies in a concrete way.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (coherent likelihood and phase term): the resolution formula δθ_diff ∼ (1/SNR)(λ_GW/r) is obtained by treating pulsar distances d as fixed, exact inputs in the phase 2π f d (1 − n̂·p̂). No propagation of realistic fractional distance errors δd/d into the angular posterior or effective SNR is shown; a δd/d ∼ 0.1 already produces O(1) radian phase scatter at PTA frequencies, which can broaden the localization kernel beyond the claimed limit.
  2. [§4] §4 (numerical results and scaling): the statement that the diffraction limit is reached with ~9 pulsars at SNR=10 is demonstrated only under the assumption of perfect distance knowledge. No Monte Carlo realizations or analytic marginalization over δd are presented to test whether the scaling ∼ (1/SNR)^{N_dist/2} survives when distance uncertainties are included at the level already achieved for the best-timed pulsars.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The citation to Jow et al. (2025) should include the arXiv identifier or journal status for completeness.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 (resolution vs. N_dist) would benefit from an additional curve showing the degradation when δd is drawn from current measurement uncertainties.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments on distance uncertainties. We agree these must be addressed to strengthen the claims and will revise the manuscript with additional analysis on error propagation and simulations while preserving the core theoretical results for the ideal case.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (coherent likelihood and phase term): the resolution formula δθ_diff ∼ (1/SNR)(λ_GW/r) is obtained by treating pulsar distances d as fixed, exact inputs in the phase 2π f d (1 − n̂·p̂). No propagation of realistic fractional distance errors δd/d into the angular posterior or effective SNR is shown; a δd/d ∼ 0.1 already produces O(1) radian phase scatter at PTA frequencies, which can broaden the localization kernel beyond the claimed limit.

    Authors: We acknowledge that §3 derives the theoretical diffraction limit assuming fixed, exact distances, as the manuscript focuses on the potential of precise measurements. Realistic δd can indeed introduce phase scatter. In revision we will add an analytic treatment propagating δd into the phase term and posterior, deriving the condition δd ≪ λ_GW/(2π f) under which the limit holds (sub-parsec for PTA frequencies). This will be illustrated for PSR J0437−4715 and include an effective-SNR correction. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (numerical results and scaling): the statement that the diffraction limit is reached with ~9 pulsars at SNR=10 is demonstrated only under the assumption of perfect distance knowledge. No Monte Carlo realizations or analytic marginalization over δd are presented to test whether the scaling ∼ (1/SNR)^{N_dist/2} survives when distance uncertainties are included at the level already achieved for the best-timed pulsars.

    Authors: The §4 results and scaling establish the ideal-case upper bound. We will add Monte Carlo realizations in the revision that marginalize over realistic δd distributions (e.g., 0.1 pc for best-timed pulsars). These simulations will test robustness of the N_dist ≈ 9 threshold at SNR=10 and confirm the scaling holds approximately when uncertainties remain small relative to the wavelength. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses external distance inputs to construct new angular resolution bound

full rationale

The paper's central derivation introduces a coherent map-making procedure that treats measured pulsar distances as fixed external inputs to the timing residual phase term 2π f d (1 − n̂·p̂). This phase information is then used to construct a likelihood or map whose angular width scales as (1/SNR)(λ_GW/r). The resulting δθ_diff expression is obtained directly from the geometry of the plane-wave response and the number of independent distance-constrained pulsars; it does not reduce by algebraic substitution to any fitted parameter or to a quantity defined in terms of the claimed resolution itself. The citation to Jow et al. 2025 supplies only the baseline isotropic-array resolution and is not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing premise for the new coherent result. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input renaming, or ansatz smuggling is present in the provided derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard PTA timing residual models and plane-wave gravitational wave approximations from prior literature, with the addition of distance measurements treated as independent inputs.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gravitational waves are treated as monochromatic plane waves from a single source
    Invoked to derive the diffraction-limited resolution formula δθ_diff ∼ (1/SNR)(λ_GW/r)

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5594 in / 1354 out tokens · 49494 ms · 2026-05-16T22:44:33.851866+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Archival Multiband Gravitational-Wave Signals from Massive Black Hole Binary Mergers

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Massive black hole binary mergers produce orphaned low-frequency signals in PTA pulsar terms that can be stacked for archival multiband gravitational-wave detection.

  2. A comprehensive framework for phase-coherent mapping of the gravitational-wave sky with pulsar timing arrays

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new phase-coherent mapping framework for pulsar timing arrays that preserves the complete complex polarization state of the gravitational-wave sky in compact maps usable for multiple analyses.

  3. From Detection to Host Galaxy Identification: Precision Continuous Gravitational Wave Localization with a Few Anchor Pulsars

    astro-ph.GA 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A small set of anchor pulsars with sub-wavelength distance precision can reduce 90% credible sky localization areas to 0.1-9.2 square degrees at SNR 20, enabling host galaxy identification.

  4. Stochastic problems in pulsar timing

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Analytical solutions to Langevin equations for red noise and GWB in pulsars show that an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck spin frequency model is inconsistent with stationary signals, while an overdamped oscillator model and a two-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    blind-spots

    Thisfiguredemonstratesthefringeinterferenceeffectsfrom the pulsar term that generates isolated islands of intensity that allow for GW localization far beyond the limit of an Earth-term only analysis. LOCALIZING A SINGLE GW Our goal in this section is to estimate the number of precisely measured pulsar distances required to reach diffraction-limited resolu...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, Z. Ar- zoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. Becsy, L. Blecha, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, R. Burnette, R. Case, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, K. Chatziioannou, B. D. Cheeseboro, S. Chen, T. Cohen, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T. Cromartie, K. Crowter, C. J. Cutler, M. E. Decesar, D. Degan, P. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Antoniadiset al., Mon

    J. Antoniadis, Z. Arzoumanian, S. Babak, M. Bailes, A.-S. Bak Nielsen, P. T. Baker, C. G. Bassa, B. Bécsy, A. Berthereau, M. Bonetti, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, M. Burgay, S. Burke-Spolaor, R. N. Caballero, J. A. Casey-Clyde, A. Chalumeau, D. J. Champion, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, S. Chen, I. Cognard, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T. Cromart...

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Antoniadis et al

    EPTA Collaboration, InPTA Collaboration, J. An- toniadis, P. Arumugam, S. Arumugam, S. Babak, M. Bagchi, A.-S. Bak Nielsen, C. G. Bassa, A. Bathula, A. Berthereau, M. Bonetti, E. Bortolas, P. R. Brook, M. Burgay, R. N. Caballero, A. Chalumeau, D. J. Cham- pion, S. Chanlaridis, S. Chen, I. Cognard, S. Dan- dapat, D. Deb, S. Desai, G. Desvignes, N. Dhanda- ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    H. Xu, S. Chen, Y. Guo, J. Jiang, B. Wang, J. Xu, Z. Xue, R. N. Caballero, J. Yuan, Y. Xu, J. Wang, L. Hao, J. Luo, K. Lee, J. Han, P. Jiang, Z. Shen, M. Wang, N. Wang, R. Xu, X. Wu, R. Manchester, L.Qian, X.Guan, M.Huang, C.Sun,andY.Zhu,Search- ing for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Relea...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    D. J. Reardon, A. Zic, R. M. Shannon, G. B. Hobbs, M. Bailes, V. Di Marco, A. Kapur, A. F. Rogers, E. Thrane, J. Askew, N. D. R. Bhat, A. Cameron, M. Curyło, W. A. Coles, S. Dai, B. Goncharov, M. Kerr, A. Kulkarni, Y. Levin, M. E. Lower, R. N. Manchester, R. Mandow, M. T. Miles, R. S. Nathan, S. Osłowski, C. J. Russell, R. Spiewak, S. Zhang, and X.-J. Zhu...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    S., Thrane, E., et al

    K. Grunthal, R. S. Nathan, E. Thrane, D. J. Champion, M. T. Miles, R. M. Shannon, A. D. Kulkarni, F. Ab- bate, S. Buchner, A. D. Cameron, M. Geyer, P. Gitika, M. J. Keith, M. Kramer, P. D. Lasky, A. Parthasarathy, D. J. Reardon, J. Singha, and V. Venkatraman Krishnan, The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: Maps of the grav- itational wave sky with the 4.5-yr da...

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    S. R. Taylor, R. van Haasteren, and A. Sesana, From bright binaries to bumpy backgrounds: Mapping realistic gravitational wave skies with pulsar-timing arrays, PRD 102, 084039 (2020), arXiv:2006.04810 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Ali-Haïmoud, T

    Y. Ali-Haïmoud, T. L. Smith, and C. M. F. Mingarelli, Fisher formalism for anisotropic gravitational-wave back- ground searches with pulsar timing arrays, PRD102, 122005 (2020), arXiv:2006.14570 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    N. J. Cornish and R. van Haasteren, Mapping the nano-Hertz gravitational wave sky, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1406.4511 (2014), arXiv:1406.4511 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Sato-Polito, M

    G. Sato-Polito, M. Zaldarriaga, and E. Quataert, Where are NANOGrav’s big black holes?, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2312.06756 (2023), arXiv:2312.06756 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    A Population of Short-Period Variable Quasars from PTF as Supermassive Black Hole Binary Candidates

    M. Charisi, I. Bartos, Z. Haiman, A. M. Price-Whelan, M. J. Graham, E. C. Bellm, R. R. Laher, and S. Márka, A population of short-period variable quasars from PTF as supermassive black hole binary candidates, MNRAS 463, 2145 (2016), arXiv:1604.01020 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    M. J. Graham, S. G. Djorgovski, D. Stern, E. Glikman, A. J. Drake, A. A. Mahabal, C. Donalek, S. Larson, and E. Christensen, A possible close supermassive black-hole binary in a quasar with optical periodicity, Nature518, 74 (2015), arXiv:1501.01375 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    R., Charisi, M., & Ma, C.-P

    P. Petrov, S. R. Taylor, M. Charisi, and C.-P. Ma, Iden- tifying the Host Galaxies of Supermassive Black Hole Bi- naries Found by Pulsar Timing Arrays, ApJ976, 129 (2024), arXiv:2406.04409 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    D. J. D’Orazio and A. Loeb, Using gravitational wave parallax to measure the Hubble parameter with pulsar timing arrays, PRD104, 063015 (2021), arXiv:2009.06084 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    D. L. Jow and U.-L. Pen, Measuring Cosmic Ex- pansion with Diffractive Gravitational Scintillation of Nanohertz Gravitational Waves, PRL134, 131001 (2025), arXiv:2407.03214 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Shocks in the Early Universe

    U.-L. Pen and N. Turok, Shocks in the Early Uni- verse, PRL117, 131301 (2016), arXiv:1510.02985 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Pulsar timing arrays as imaging gravitational wave telescopes: angular resolution and source (de)confusion

    L. Boyle and U.-L. Pen, Pulsar timing arrays as imag- ing gravitational wave telescopes: Angular resolution and source (de)confusion, PRD86, 124028 (2012), arXiv:1010.4337 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    The stochastic gravitational-wave background from massive black hole binary systems: implications for observations with Pulsar Timing Arrays

    A. Sesana, A. Vecchio, and C. N. Colacino, The stochastic gravitational-wave background from massive black hole binary systems: implications for observations with Pulsar Timing Arrays, MNRAS390, 192 (2008), arXiv:0804.4476 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    D. L. Jow, A. Tsai, and U.-L. Pen, How many pixels are there in a polarized pulsar timing array map?, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.21380 (2025), arXiv:2507.21380 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    K. J. Lee, N. Wex, M. Kramer, B. W. Stappers, C. G. Bassa, G. H. Janssen, R. Karuppusamy, and R. Smits, Gravitational wave astronomy of single sources with a pulsar timing array, MNRAS414, 3251 (2011), arXiv:1103.0115 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Kato and K

    R. Kato and K. Takahashi, Precision of localization of singlegravitational-wavesourcewithpulsartimingarray, PRD108, 123535 (2023), arXiv:2308.10419 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Kato and K

    R. Kato and K. Takahashi, Realistic assessment of a single gravitational wave source localization taking into account precise pulsar distances with pulsar tim- ing arrays, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.02819 (2025), arXiv:2506.02819 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Mining Weak Lensing Surveys

    N. Padmanabhan, U. Seljak, and U. L. Pen, Mining weak lensing surveys, New Astronomy8, 581 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0210478 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  25. [25]

    Fast Power Spectrum Estimation

    U.-L. Pen, Fast power spectrum estimation, MNRAS 346, 619 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0304513 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  26. [26]

    J. G. Baier, J. S. Hazboun, and J. D. Romano, A sen- sitivity curve approach to tuning a pulsar timing array in the detection era, Classical and Quantum Gravity42, 075008 (2025), arXiv:2409.00336 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    D. J. Reardon, M. Bailes, R. M. Shannon, C. Flynn, J.Askew, N.D.R.Bhat, Z.-C.Chen, M.Curyło, Y.Feng, G. B. Hobbs, A. Kapur, M. Kerr, X. Liu, R. N. Manch- ester, R. Mandow, S. Mishra, C. J. Russell, M. Shamo- hammadi, L. Zhang, and A. Zic, The Neutron Star Mass, Distance, and Inclination from Precision Timing of the Brilliant Millisecond Pulsar J0437-4715,...

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    D. J. Reardon, R. M. Shannon, A. D. Cameron, B. Gon- charov, G. B. Hobbs, H. Middleton, M. Shamoham- madi, N. Thyagarajan, M. Bailes, N. D. R. Bhat, S. Dai, M. Kerr, R. N. Manchester, C. J. Russell, R. Spiewak, J. B. Wang, and X. J. Zhu, The Parkes pulsar timing ar- ray second data release: timing analysis, MNRAS507, 8 2137 (2021), arXiv:2107.04609 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    H. Ding, A. T. Deller, B. W. Stappers, T. J. W. Lazio, D. Kaplan, S. Chatterjee, W. Brisken, J. Cordes, P. C. C. Freire, E. Fonseca, I. Stairs, L. Guillemot, A. Lyne, I. Cognard, D. J. Reardon, and G. Theureau, The MSPSRπcatalogue: VLBA astrometry of 18 millisec- ondpulsars,MNRAS519,4982(2023),arXiv:2212.06351 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Prospects for accurate distance measurements of pulsars with the SKA: enabling fundamental physics

    R. Smits, S. J. Tingay, N. Wex, M. Kramer, and B. Stappers, Prospects for accurate distance measure- ments of pulsars with the Square Kilometre Array: En- abling fundamental physics, AAP528, A108 (2011), arXiv:1101.5971 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Baker, W

    D. Baker, W. Brisken, M. H. van Kerkwijk, R. Main, U.-L. Pen, T. Sprenger, and O. Wucknitz, Interstel- lar interferometry: precise curvature measurement from pulsar secondary spectra, MNRAS510, 4573 (2022), arXiv:2101.04646 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Baker, W

    D. Baker, W. Brisken, M. H. van Kerkwijk, R. van Lieshout, and U.-L. Pen, High-resolution VLBI astrom- etry of pulsar scintillation screens with theθ-θtrans- form, MNRAS525, 211 (2023), arXiv:2212.01417 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    D. J. Reardon, R. Main, S. K. Ocker, R. M. Shan- non, M. Bailes, F. Camilo, M. Geyer, A. Jameson, M. Kramer, A. Parthasarathy, R. Spiewak, W. van Straten, and V. Venkatraman Krishnan, Bow shock and Local Bubble plasma unveiled by the scintillating mil- lisecond pulsar J0437−4715, Nature Astronomy9, 1053 (2025), arXiv:2410.21390 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Montalvo, M

    D. Montalvo, M. van Kerkwijk, D. Baker, U.-L. Pen, and A. Stock, Scintillation arcs for fast pulsar binaries: the double pulsar (2025), in preparation

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    G. Mall, R. A. Main, J. Antoniadis, C. G. Bassa, M. Bur- gay, S. Chen, I. Cognard, R. Concu, A. Corongiu, M. Gaikwad, H. Hu, G. H. Janssen, R. Karuppusamy, M. Kramer, K. J. Lee, K. Liu, J. W. McKee, A. Melis, M.B.Mickaliger, D.Perrodin, M.Pilia, A.Possenti, D.J. Reardon, S. A. Sanidas, T. Sprenger, B. W. Stappers, L. Wang, O. Wucknitz, and W. W. Zhu, Mode...

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Y.-H. Chen, S. Siegel, D. Baker, U.-L. Pen, and D. Stine- bring, Transient Blurring of the Scintillation Arc of Pul- sar B1737+13, ApJ990, 91 (2025), arXiv:2412.10323 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    R. A. Main, J. Antoniadis, S. Chen, I. Cognard, H. Hu, J. Jang, R. Karuppusamy, M. Kramer, K. Liu, Y. Liu, G. Mall, J. W. McKee, M. B. Mickaliger, D. Perrodin, S. A. Sanidas, B. W. Stappers, T. Sprenger, O. Wuck- nitz, C. G. Bassa, M. Burgay, R. Concu, M. Gaikwad, G. H. Janssen, K. J. Lee, A. Melis, M. Pilia, A. Pos- senti, L. Wang, and W. W. Zhu, Variabl...

    work page arXiv 2023