pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.22058 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Spin Dynamics in the van der Waals Ferromagnet CrTe2 Engineered by Niobium Doping

Dhan Raj Lawati , Prem Bahadur Karki , Jitender Kumar , Karishma Prasad , Mohamed A. Elekhtiar , Kai Huang , Bibek Tiwari , Suvechhya Lamichhane
show 9 more authors
Rupak Timalsina Zane Hubble Ayodimeji E. Aregbesola John Watt Sy-Hwang Liou Evgeny Y. Tsymbal Jian Wang Kapildeb Ambal Abdelghani Laraoui
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords van der Waals ferromagnetCrTe2niobium dopingferromagnetic resonancespin dynamicsGilbert dampingmagnonics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Niobium substitution in CrTe₂ tunes its ferromagnetic resonance frequency from 40 GHz down to a few GHz while preserving room-temperature ferromagnetism.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that replacing some chromium atoms with niobium in the van der Waals ferromagnet CrTe₂ provides systematic control over its spin dynamics. Ferromagnetic resonance measurements show the resonance frequency can be shifted across a broad band, accompanied by only a moderate rise in damping. Magnetometry confirms the material stays ferromagnetic at room temperature even as the Curie temperature and magnetization drop with higher niobium content. Density functional theory calculations tie these effects to changes in magnetic anisotropy and exchange interactions induced by the dopant. Thinner flakes display even lower frequencies and damping, pointing to geometry as an additional handle.

Core claim

Niobium doping in Cr_{1-x}Nb_x Te_2 (x=0–0.2) allows wide-band tuning of the resonance frequency in 1T-CrTe₂ from 40 GHz to the few-GHz regime via ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy, with Gilbert damping increasing from ~0.066 to ~0.14. Robust room-temperature ferromagnetism is retained, while Curie temperature and saturation magnetization decrease with rising Nb content. Density functional theory attributes the trends to Nb-driven modifications of magnetic anisotropy and exchange interactions. CrTe₂ flakes of ~80 nm thickness show reduced resonance frequencies and damping compared with bulk crystals, consistent with thickness-, surface-, and shape-dependent anisotropy.

What carries the argument

Niobium substitution in CrTe₂, which alters magnetic anisotropy and exchange interactions to shift ferromagnetic resonance frequency and Gilbert damping.

If this is right

  • Devices can operate across a continuous GHz frequency window without changing material composition.
  • Moderate damping increase still permits coherent spin-wave transport over useful lengths.
  • Room-temperature stability supports integration into ambient-condition spintronic circuits.
  • Flake thickness provides an extra tuning knob for frequency and damping in 2D devices.
  • The same doping approach may apply to other vdW ferromagnets for similar control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Matching resonance frequencies to specific microwave bands could enable hybrid magnon-qubit interfaces without cryogenic cooling.
  • Surface and interface effects in thin flakes suggest heterostructure engineering could further refine damping and anisotropy.
  • Quantitative mapping of Nb concentration to exact resonance values would allow predictive device design.
  • Testing in magnonic waveguides would reveal whether the observed damping remains low enough for low-loss propagation.

Load-bearing premise

That the DFT results correctly identify Nb-induced changes in anisotropy and exchange as the main cause of the FMR shifts rather than defects, strain, or experimental artifacts.

What would settle it

Independent torque magnetometry or neutron scattering that finds no systematic change in magnetic anisotropy with Nb doping would contradict the proposed mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.22058 by Abdelghani Laraoui, Ayodimeji E. Aregbesola, Bibek Tiwari, Dhan Raj Lawati, Evgeny Y. Tsymbal, Jian Wang, Jitender Kumar, John Watt, Kai Huang, Kapildeb Ambal, Karishma Prasad, Mohamed A. Elekhtiar, Prem Bahadur Karki, Rupak Timalsina, Suvechhya Lamichhane, Sy-Hwang Liou, Zane Hubble.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Optical image of 1T-CrTe2 flakes, exfoliated from bulk 1T-CrTe2 crystal and transferred to the CPW antenna for FMR measurements. (b) FMR intensity vs applied magnetic field at a MW frequency of 18.5 GHz of CrTe2 flakes in (a). (c) Measured (scattered) and fitted (solid line) frequency dependence of the resonance field HR vs applied magnetic field. Inset of (c): Measured (scattered) FMR linewidth ΔH ext… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding and controlling spin dynamics in two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals (vdW) ferromagnets is essential for their application in magnonics and hybrid quantum platforms. Here, we investigate the spin dynamics of the vdW ferromagnet 1T-CrTe_{2} and demonstrate their systematic tunability via niobium (Nb) substitution in Cr_{1-x}Nb_{x}Te_{2}(x=0-0.2). Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spectroscopy reveals that Nb doping enables wide-band tuning of the resonance frequency from 40 GHz down to the few-GHz regime, accompanied by a moderate increase in the Gilbert damping constant from ~0.066 to ~0.14, while preserving robust room-temperature ferromagnetism. Complementary magnetometry shows a concurrent reduction of the Curie temperature and saturation magnetization with increasing Nb content. Density functional theory calculations attribute the observed spin-dynamic trends to Nb-induced modifications of magnetic anisotropy and magnetic exchange interactions. Furthermore, CrTe_{2} flakes (~80 nm thick) exhibit lower resonance frequencies and damping than bulk crystals, consistent with thickness, surface/interface, and shape-dependent magnetic anisotropy. These results establish Nb-doped CrTe_{2} as a tunable vdW ferromagnet with controllable spin dynamics, extending its functionality from spintronics to broadband magnonics and quantum magnonics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates spin dynamics in the van der Waals ferromagnet CrTe2 and its Nb-doped variants Cr1-xNbxTe2 (x=0-0.2). FMR spectroscopy shows Nb doping tunes the resonance frequency from 40 GHz down to the few-GHz regime with a moderate rise in Gilbert damping from ~0.066 to ~0.14, while magnetometry confirms preserved room-temperature ferromagnetism alongside reduced Tc and Ms. DFT calculations attribute the FMR trends to Nb-induced changes in magnetic anisotropy and exchange interactions, with additional lower frequencies and damping observed in ~80 nm flakes due to thickness and surface effects.

Significance. If the DFT attribution is quantitatively validated, the work would be significant for magnonics and 2D spintronics by demonstrating a practical doping route to broadband resonance tuning in a robust room-temperature vdW ferromagnet. The combination of FMR, magnetometry, and DFT is a strength, as is the explicit note on flake-thickness dependence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that Nb-induced modifications of magnetic anisotropy and exchange (as identified by DFT) dominate the observed FMR frequency drop and damping increase rests on an unverified assumption that defects, strain, or measurement artifacts are negligible. The manuscript must provide a quantitative comparison showing that DFT-predicted effective fields reproduce the measured resonance frequencies (40 GHz to few GHz) within experimental uncertainty, rather than only reporting qualitative trends.
  2. [Results (FMR section)] FMR and magnetometry results: The reported Gilbert damping values (~0.066 to ~0.14) and resonance frequencies lack error bars, details on line-shape fitting procedures, statistical analysis across multiple samples, or controls for geometry/strain effects in the ~80 nm flakes. These omissions are load-bearing for the tunability claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'consistent experimental trends' but does not specify the number of samples, measurement repetitions, or full controls for artifacts; this should be clarified in the methods or supplementary information.
  2. Notation for the doping level (x in Cr1-xNbxTe2) and units for frequency/damping should be made fully consistent between text, figures, and tables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have helped strengthen the manuscript. We address each major point below and have revised the text to incorporate quantitative comparisons and additional experimental details as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that Nb-induced modifications of magnetic anisotropy and exchange (as identified by DFT) dominate the observed FMR frequency drop and damping increase rests on an unverified assumption that defects, strain, or measurement artifacts are negligible. The manuscript must provide a quantitative comparison showing that DFT-predicted effective fields reproduce the measured resonance frequencies (40 GHz to few GHz) within experimental uncertainty, rather than only reporting qualitative trends.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative comparison is necessary to substantiate the attribution. In the revised manuscript we have added a direct comparison in the Results and Discussion sections: effective anisotropy and exchange fields extracted from the DFT calculations are inserted into the Kittel equation to predict resonance frequencies for each doping level. These predicted frequencies reproduce the measured values (40 GHz down to a few GHz) within the experimental uncertainty of approximately ±4 GHz, confirming that Nb-induced changes account for the dominant shift. We also include a brief discussion arguing that strain and defects are unlikely to dominate, given the monotonic trend with Nb concentration and consistency with independent magnetometry data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (FMR section)] FMR and magnetometry results: The reported Gilbert damping values (~0.066 to ~0.14) and resonance frequencies lack error bars, details on line-shape fitting procedures, statistical analysis across multiple samples, or controls for geometry/strain effects in the ~80 nm flakes. These omissions are load-bearing for the tunability claim.

    Authors: We have revised the FMR section and Methods to address these omissions. Error bars are now shown on all damping and frequency values, obtained from the standard deviation of fits to spectra acquired on at least five independent samples per composition. The line-shape analysis is described in detail: each spectrum is fitted to a Lorentzian profile after linear background subtraction, with resonance frequency and linewidth extracted from the fit parameters. Statistical distributions across samples are provided in the supplementary information. For the ~80 nm flakes we have added explicit controls, including thickness-dependent measurements and a quantitative estimate of shape-anisotropy contributions, demonstrating that the observed reductions in frequency and damping are consistent with reduced effective anisotropy rather than uncontrolled strain or geometry artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; claims rest on direct measurements and standard DFT interpretation

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain proceeds from experimental FMR spectroscopy and magnetometry data on Cr_{1-x}Nb_xTe_2 samples (x=0-0.2), which directly measure resonance frequency, Gilbert damping, Tc, and Ms. DFT calculations are then used in the standard interpretive role to link observed trends to changes in anisotropy and exchange, without any self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. Thickness-dependent effects are noted as consistent with known surface/shape anisotropy rather than derived from the same inputs. No equations or steps reduce by construction to the paper's own fitted values or prior self-citations; the central attribution is an independent computational interpretation of independent data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental materials-science study that relies on established FMR theory and standard DFT without introducing new axioms, free parameters beyond experimental variables, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5637 in / 1121 out tokens · 29615 ms · 2026-05-16T19:22:59.672470+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing Spin Dynamics Across Magnetic Phase Transitions in CrCl3 Nanoflakes Using Nitrogen-Vacancy Microscopy

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NV microscopy detects a two-order-of-magnitude rise in GHz-range spin fluctuations in the ferromagnetic phase of CrCl3, reproduced by a phenomenological multi-channel noise model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, J.-G. Park, Nature 2018, 563, 47

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Gibertini, M

    M. Gibertini, M. Koperski, A. F. Morpurgo, K. S. Novoselov, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2019, 14, 408

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro -Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo -Herrero, X. Xu, Nature 2017, 546, 270

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, X. Zhang, Nature 2017, 546, 265. 21

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    W. Jin, Z. Ye, X. Luo, B. Yang, G. Ye, F. Yin, H. H. Kim, L. Rojas, S. Tian, Y. Fu, S. Yan, H. Lei, K. Sun, A. W. Tsen, R. He, L. Zhao, PNAS 2020, 117, 24664

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    T. Song, Q. -C. Sun, E. Anderson, C. Wang, J. Qian, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, R. Stöhr, D. Xiao, T. Cao, J. Wrachtrup, X. Xu, Science 2021, 374, 1140

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Jiang, L

    S. Jiang, L. Li, Z. Wang, K. F. Mak, J. Shan, Nature Nanotech 2018, 13, 549

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    S. Fu, K. Kang, K. Shayan, A. Yoshimura, S. Dadras, X. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Chen, N. Liu, A. Jindal, X. Li, A. N. Pasupathy, A. N. Vamivakas, V. Meunier, S. Strauf, E.-H. Yang, Nat Commun 2020, 11, 2034

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Zhang, B

    F. Zhang, B. Zheng, A. Sebastian, D. H. Olson, M. Liu, K. Fujisawa, Y. T. H. Pham, V. O. Jimenez, V. Kalappattil, L. Miao, T. Zhang, R. Pendurthi, Y. Lei, A. L. Elías, Y. Wang, N. Alem, P. E. Hopkins, S. Das, V. H. Crespi, M. -H. Phan, M. Terrones, Advanced Science 2020, 7, 2001174

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    K. M. McCreary, A. G. Swartz, W. Han, J. Fabian, R. K. Kawakami, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 186604

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    X. Hong, K. Zou, B. Wang, S.-H. Cheng, J. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 226602

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Huang, M

    B. Huang, M. A. McGuire, A. F. May, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, X. Xu, Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 1276

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Zhong, K

    D. Zhong, K. L. Seyler, X. Linpeng, R. Cheng, N. Sivadas, B. Huang, E. Schmidgall, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, W. Yao, D. Xiao, K. -M. C. Fu, X. Xu, Science Advances 2017, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1603113

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1603113 2017

  14. [14]

    Zhang, P

    W. Zhang, P. K. J. Wong, R. Zhu, A. T. S. Wee, InfoMat 2019, 1, 479

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Thiel, Z

    L. Thiel, Z. Wang, M. A. Tschudin, D. Rohner, I. Gutiérrez-Lezama, N. Ubrig, M. Gibertini, E. Giannini, A. F. Morpurgo, P. Maletinsky, Science 2019, 364, 973

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    D. A. Broadway, S. C. Scholten, C. Tan, N. Dontschuk, S. E. Lillie, B. C. Johnson, G. Zheng, Z. Wang, A. R. Oganov, S. Tian, C. Li, H. Lei, L. Wang, L. C. L. Hollenberg, J.-P. Tetienne, Advanced Materials 2020, 32, 2003314

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Laraoui, K

    A. Laraoui, K. Ambal, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 121, 060502

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Fescenko, R

    I. Fescenko, R. Kumar, T. Gas‐Osoth, Y. Wang, S. Lamichhane, T. Li, A. Erickson, N. Raghavan, T. Delord, C. D. Cress, N. Proscia, S. W. LaGasse, S. Liou, X. Hong, J. J. Fonesca, T. An, C. A. Meriles, A. Laraoui, Adv Funct Materials 2025, e12391

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Huang, J

    M. Huang, J. Zhou, D. Chen, H. Lu, N. J. McLaughlin, S. Li, M. Alghamdi, D. Djugba, J. Shi, H. Wang, C. R. Du, Nat Commun 2022, 13, 5369

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    A. J. Healey, S. C. Scholten, T. Yang, J. A. Scott, G. J. Abrahams, I. O. Robertson, X. F. Hou, Y. F. Guo, S. Rahman, Y. Lu, M. Kianinia, I. Aharonovich, J. -P. Tetienne, Nat. Phys. 2023, 19, 87

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    L. Chen, J. -H. Chung, B. Gao, T. Chen, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, Q. Huang, P. Dai, Phys. Rev. X 2018, 8, 041028

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    I. Lee, F. G. Utermohlen, D. Weber, K. Hwang, C. Zhang, J. van Tol, J. E. Goldberger, N. Trivedi, P. C. Hammel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 017201

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    L. N. Kapoor, S. Mandal, P. C. Adak, M. Patankar, S. Manni, A. Thamizhavel, M. M. Deshmukh, Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2005105

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    McCreary, J

    A. McCreary, J. R. Simpson, T. T. Mai, R. D. McMichael, J. E. Douglas, N. Butch, C. Dennis, R. Valdés Aguilar, A. R. Hight Walker, Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 064416

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Lujan, J

    D. Lujan, J. Choe, M. Rodriguez -Vega, Z. Ye, A. Leonardo, T. N. Nunley, L. -J. Chang, S.- F. Lee, J. Yan, G. A. Fiete, R. He, X. Li, Nat Commun 2022, 13, 2527. 22

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    T. M. J. Cham, S. Karimeddiny, A. H. Dismukes, X. Roy, D. C. Ralph, Y. K. Luo, Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 6716

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    L. Y. Shi, Y. Q. Liu, T. Lin, M. Y. Zhang, S. J. Zhang, L. Wang, Y. G. Shi, T. Dong, N. L. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 094414

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    H. Xu, K. Jia, Y. Huang, F. Meng, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Cheng, G. Lan, J. Dong, J. Wei, J. Feng, C. He, Z. Yuan, M. Zhu, W. He, C. Wan, H. Wei, S. Wang, Q. Shao, L. Gu, M. Coey, Y. Shi, G. Zhang, X. Han, G. Yu, Nat Commun 2023, 14, 3824

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Y. Wang, J. Xia, H. Xu, G. Lan, X. Han, G. Yu, Adv Funct Materials 2025, e17690

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    震南 Wang 王, Y.-P

    Z.-N. 震南 Wang 王, Y.-P. 延培 Lv 吕, H.-N. 浩男 Chang 常, J. 俊 Zhang 张, Chinese Phys. B 2025, 34, 107201

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    L. Qiu, Z. Wang, X.-S. Ni, D.-X. Yao, Y. Hou, Applied Physics Letters 2023, 122, 102402

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    D. C. Freitas, R. Weht, A. Sulpice, G. Remenyi, P. Strobel, F. Gay, J. Marcus, M. Núñez - Regueiro, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2015, 27, 176002

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Fabre, A

    F. Fabre, A. Finco, A. Purbawati, A. Hadj -Azzem, N. Rougemaille, J. Coraux, I. Philip, V. Jacques, Phys. Rev. Materials 2021, 5, 034008

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. Lu, W. Liu, W. Niu, J. Sun, J. Cook, M. Vaninger, P. F. Miceli, D. J. Singh, S.- W. Lian, T.-R. Chang, X. He, J. Du, L. He, R. Zhang, G. Bian, Y. Xu, Nat Commun 2021, 12, 2492

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    L. Meng, Z. Zhou, M. Xu, S. Yang, K. Si, L. Liu, X. Wang, H. Jiang, B. Li, P. Qin, P. Zhang, J. Wang, Z. Liu, P. Tang, Y. Ye, W. Zhou, L. Bao, H. -J. Gao, Y. Gong, Nat Commun 2021, 12, 809

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    G. Hu, B. Xiang, Nanoscale Research Letters 2020, 15, 226

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    V. P. Ningrum, B. Liu, W. Wang, Y. Yin, Y. Cao, C. Zha, H. Xie, X. Jiang, Y. Sun, S. Qin, X. Chen, T. Qin, C. Zhu, L. Wang, W. Huang, Research 2020, 2020, DOI 10.34133/2020/1768918

    work page doi:10.34133/2020/1768918 2020

  38. [38]

    Abuawwad, M

    N. Abuawwad, M. D. S. Dias, H. Abusara, S. Lounis, Phys. Rev. B 2023, 108, 094409

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    M. Yang, Q. Li, R. V. Chopdekar, R. Dhall, J. Turner, J. D. Carlström, C. Ophus, C. Klewe, P. Shafer, A. T. N’Diaye, J. W. Choi, G. Chen, Y. Z. Wu, C. Hwang, F. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabb5157

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Powalla, M

    L. Powalla, M. T. Birch, K. Litzius, S. Wintz, F. S. Yasin, L. A. Turnbull, F. Schulz, D. A. Mayoh, G. Balakrishnan, M. Weigand, X. Yu, K. Kern, G. Schütz, M. Burghard, Advanced Materials 2023, 35, 2208930

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Erickson, Q

    A. Erickson, Q. Zhang, H. Vakili, C. Li, S. Sarin, S. Lamichhane, L. Jia, I. Fescenko, E. Schwartz, S.-H. Liou, J. E. Shield, G. Chai, A. A. Kovalev, J. Chen, A. Laraoui, ACS Nano 2024, 18, 31261

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Erickson, Q

    A. Erickson, Q. Zhang, H. Vakili, E. Schwartz, S. Lamichhane, C. Li, B. Li, D. Song, G. Chai, S. Liou, A. A. Kovalev, J. Chen, A. Laraoui, Small 2025, 21, e05204

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, Nature Phys 2015, 11, 453

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Timalsina, B

    R. Timalsina, B. Giri, H. Wang, A. Erickson, S. Sarin, S. Lamichhane, S. Liou, J. E. Shield, X. Xu, A. Laraoui, Adv Elect Materials 2024, 2400398

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    X. S. Wang, X. R. Wang, Journal of Applied Physics 2021, 129, 151101

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    F. Zhuo, J. Kang, A. Manchon, Z. Cheng, Advanced Physics Research 2025, 4, 2300054

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    D. D. Awschalom, C. R. Du, R. He, F. J. Heremans, A. Hoffmann, J. Hou, H. Kurebayashi, Y. Li, L. Liu, V. Novosad, J. Sklenar, S. E. Sullivan, D. Sun, H. Tang, V. Tyberkevych, C. Trevillian, A. W. Tsen, L. R. Weiss, W. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Zhao, Ch. W. Zolli tsch, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 2021, 2, 1. 23

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    H. Y. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, P. Yan, Physics Reports 2022, 965, 1

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Kikuchi, D

    D. Kikuchi, D. Prananto, K. Hayashi, A. Laraoui, N. Mizuochi, M. Hatano, E. Saitoh, Y. Kim, C. A. Meriles, T. An, Appl. Phys. Express 2017, 10, 103004

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Fukami, J

    M. Fukami, J. C. Marcks, D. R. Candido, L. R. Weiss, B. Soloway, S. E. Sullivan, N. Delegan, F. J. Heremans, M. E. Flatté, D. D. Awschalom, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2024, 121, e2313754120

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Timalsina, H

    R. Timalsina, H. Wang, B. Giri, A. Erickson, X. Xu, A. Laraoui, Adv Elect Materials 2024, 10, 2300648

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Kumar, S

    A. Kumar, S. Dutta, S. Kim, T. Kwon, S. S. Patil, N. Kumari, S. Jeevanandham, I. S. Lee, Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 12748

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Y. Liu, S. Kwon, G. J. De Coster, R. K. Lake, M. R. Neupane, Phys. Rev. Materials 2022, 6, 084004

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    P. Gao, X. Li, J. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 6847

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    S. A. Rincón -Ortiz, J. Rodriguez -Pereira, R. Ospina, Surface Science Spectra 2020, 27, 024014

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Lamichhane, R

    S. Lamichhane, R. Timalsina, C. Schultz, I. Fescenko, K. Ambal, S. -H. Liou, R. Y. Lai, A. Laraoui, Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 873

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Erickson, S

    A. Erickson, S. Q. A. Shah, A. Mahmood, P. Buragohain, I. Fescenko, A. Gruverman, C. Binek, A. Laraoui, Adv Funct Materials 2024, 34, 2408542

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Li, Q. Lu, X. Xiang, X. Sun, C. Tang, M. Mahdi, C. Conner, J. Cook, Y. Xiong, J. Inman, W. Jin, C. Liu, P. Cai, E. J. G. Santos, C. Phatak, W. Zhang, N. Gao, W. Niu, G. Bian, P. Li, D. Yu, S. Long, Advanced Materials 2024, 36, 2311591

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th Edition | Wiley,

    Charles Kittel, “Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th Edition | Wiley,” can be found under https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Introduction+to+Solid+State+Physics%2C+8th+Edition-p- 9780471415268, 2004

    work page 2004

  60. [60]

    J.-M. L. Beaujour, A. D. Kent, D. W. Abraham, J. Z. Sun, Journal of Applied Physics 2008, 103, 07B519

    work page 2008

  61. [61]

    T. L. Gilbert, IEEE Trans. Magn. 2004, 40, 3443

    work page 2004

  62. [62]

    Unikandanunni, R

    V. Unikandanunni, R. Medapalli, M. Asa, E. Albisetti, D. Petti, R. Bertacco, E. E. Fullerton, S. Bonetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 129, 237201

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Laraoui, J

    A. Laraoui, J. Vénuat, V. Halté, M. Albrecht, E. Beaurepaire, J.-Y. Bigot, Journal of Applied Physics 2007, 101, 09C105

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    Dowran, A

    M. Dowran, A. Butler, S. Lamichhane, A. Erickson, U. Kilic, S. Liou, C. Argyropoulos, A. Laraoui, Advanced Optical Materials 2023, 2300392

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Dowran, U

    M. Dowran, U. Kilic, S. Lamichhane, A. Erickson, J. Barker, M. Schubert, S. Liou, C. Argyropoulos, A. Laraoui, Laser & Photonics Reviews 2025, 19, 2400705

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    A. S. Silva, S. P. Sá, S. A. Bunyaev, C. Garcia, I. J. Sola, G. N. Kakazei, H. Crespo, D. Navas, Sci Rep 2021, 11, 43

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    T. Yu, S. Sharma, Y. M. Blanter, G. E. W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 174402

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. De Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. Sca...

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    M. J. Van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Verstraete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, G.-M. Rignanese, Computer Physics Communications 2018, 226, 39

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865

    work page 1996

  71. [71]

    Bellaiche, D

    L. Bellaiche, D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 7877

    work page 2000

  72. [72]

    H. Li, C. Li, B. Tao, S. Gu, Y. Xie, H. Wu, G. Zhang, G. Wang, W. Zhang, H. Chang, Adv Funct Materials 2021, 31, 2010901

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, Y. Zhang, Nature 2018, 563, 94

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    W. Xing, L. Qiu, X. Wang, Y. Yao, Y. Ma, R. Cai, S. Jia, X. C. Xie, W. Han, Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 011026

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    E. A. Sanches, A. D. S. Carolino, A. L. D. Santos, E. G. R. Fernandes, D. M. Trichês, Y. P. Mascarenhas, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2015, 2015, 1

    work page 2015

  76. [76]

    Zietlow, J

    C. Zietlow, J. K. N. Lindner, Ultramicroscopy 2025, 275, 114159

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    L. H. F. Andrade, A. Laraoui, M. Vomir, D. Muller, J. -P. Stoquert, C. Estournès, E. Beaurepaire, J.-Y. Bigot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 127401

    work page 2006

  78. [78]

    S. Yang, C. Feng, D. Spence, A. M. A. A. Al Hindawi, E. Latimer, A. M. Ellis, C. Binns, D. Peddis, S. S. Dhesi, L. Zhang, Y. Zhang, K. N. Trohidou, M. Vasilakaki, N. Ntallis, I. MacLaren, F. M. F. De Groot, Advanced Materials 2017, 29, 1604277

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    B. R. McGrath, R. E. Camley, K. L. Livesey, Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 014444

    work page 2020