REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by
Movable antenna arrays can raise multiuser secrecy rates above fixed-position array levels, and a new block coordinate descent algorithm maximizes the sum secrecy rate by jointly tuning beamforming and antenna placements.
Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →
Jointly optimizing movable-antenna positions and digital beamforming increases the achievable multiuser sum secrecy rate against cooperating eavesdroppers compared with fixed-position arrays.
T0 review reviewed 2026-08-03 challenge →
load-bearing objection The framework is a reasonable next step for MA-aided multiuser secrecy, but Section III has two load-bearing derivation errors that break the claimed equivalence to sum-secrecy-rate maximization. the 3 major comments →
Secure Multiuser Beamforming With Movable Antenna Arrays
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
Core claim
The central claim is that in a multiuser wiretap channel, jointly optimizing the digital beamformer and the positions of movable transmit antennas maximizes the achievable sum secrecy rate, and the underlying rate expression depends on antenna positions through a field-response channel model. The paper proves a sequence of equivalences (Lemmas 1–4) that turn the non-smooth, non-concave secrecy-rate objective into a variational form that is separately concave in each variable block. A block coordinate descent algorithm then achieves a stationary point, with the beamformer update given in closed form via a regularized inverse, the position update via element-wise one-dimensional grid search, a
What carries the argument
The central object is the field-response channel model, h_k(t_m) = Σ β_{k,ℓ} e^{-j(2π/λ) t_m^T ρ_{k,ℓ}}, which ties each antenna's position t_m to the phase of each propagation path, making the channel (and hence the secrecy rate) an explicit function of antenna coordinates. On top of this, the paper's analytical engine is the fractional-programming (FP) variational reformulation, which introduces auxiliary variables α, β, and η so that the sum secrecy rate becomes separately concave in W, T, b, α, β, and η; each block then admits a simple update. The bound g on the eavesdroppers' aggregated SNR, derived via Cauchy–Schwarz and the power constraint, is what lets the non-smooth [·]^+ operator
Load-bearing premise
The whole optimization stands on the assumption that the eavesdroppers can pool their observations and cancel every other user's signal, so that the only leakage a user must worry about is the eavesdroppers' combined signal-to-noise ratio for that user's beam; if they cannot achieve that cancellation, the sum secrecy rate being maximized is too optimistic.
What would settle it
Compute the actual achievable secrecy region for a two-user, two-eavesdropper wiretap channel where eavesdroppers do not cooperate or cannot cancel the other user's signal, via exhaustive search over rate-splitting parameters; if the sum rate from equation (7) exceeds the true boundary, the FP optimization would be maximizing an upper bound rather than the true sum secrecy rate.
If this is right
- If the MA-enabled optimization is adopted, base stations with movable antennas can operate at higher secrecy rates than half-wavelength-spaced fixed arrays, all else equal.
- The algorithm's per-iteration complexity is dominated by an O(M^3) beamformer update and a grid search over MA positions, so it scales to arrays of moderate size; the authors report convergence within roughly 20 iterations.
- Increasing the antenna count M or the transmit-region side length A both improve secrecy rates, whereas increasing the number of eavesdroppers J degrades them — giving system designers a concrete trade-off landscape.
- In the RF-limited regime (M small relative to K), adding users decreases the secrecy rate, indicating that MA placement cannot fully compensate for insufficient spatial degrees of freedom.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The secrecy-rate expression (7) assumes cooperating eavesdroppers can cancel multiuser interference; a natural extension would be to relax this to non-cooperating or partially cooperating eavesdroppers, where the residual interference would change the achievable rate region.
- The paper treats MA positions as tunable within a continuous square region; one could test whether a small number of discrete candidate positions (e.g., a finite codebook) captures most of the gain, which would simplify deployment.
- The gains over FPA are shown for a specific field-response model with LoS plus three NLoS paths; whether the advantage persists under more diffuse scattering or channel-estimation error is an open empirical question.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper considers a multiuser MISO wiretap channel in which a base station equipped with movable antennas serves K users while J cooperating eavesdroppers attempt to intercept the messages. It formulates the maximization of the sum secrecy rate over the digital beamforming matrix W and the MA positions T, subject to a transmit-power constraint and per-antenna position/minimum-distance constraints. The authors then propose a block-coordinate-descent algorithm based on fractional programming (FP), claiming that Lemmas 1–4 provide an equivalent reformulation of the secrecy-rate problem, and that each block admits a closed-form or low-complexity update. Numerical results are reported to show that the MA-enabled design outperforms a fixed-position-antenna baseline.
Significance. If the reformulation were correct, the paper would address a genuinely open problem: a general MA-enabled multiuser secure beamforming design with an arbitrary number of users, data streams, and cooperating eavesdroppers, together with a tractable algorithm. The system model and the per-variable complexity accounting are useful, and the numerical study covers meaningful parameter ranges. However, the central equivalence lemmas contain algebraic errors. As a result, the objective actually optimized by Algorithm 2 is not the secrecy sum rate in (7), so the main claim of the paper is unsupported. The numerical gains may still demonstrate that MA placement helps heuristically, but they do not validate maximization of (7).
major comments (3)
- [Section III.A, Lemma 2 (Eqs. (10)–(11))] The claimed equivalence is false. Replacing log2(1/(1+γ̂_k)) by log2((1+g−γ̂_k)/(1+γ̂_k)) changes the objective by the term Σ_k b_k log2(1+g−γ̂_k). Although g itself is a constant, γ̂_k depends on W and T through (5), so this term is not a constant offset. The two problems therefore are not equivalent, and the subsequent FP development is not a reformulation of (9).
- [Section III.A, Lemma 3 and Eq. (14)] Even if (11) were accepted, the FP surrogate f_k^2 is incorrect. Setting ∂f_k^2/∂β_k = 0 gives β_k^⋆ = (g−γ̂_k)/(1+γ̂_k), and substituting back yields f_k^{2⋆} = log2((1+g)/(1+γ̂_k)) = log2(1+g) − log2(1+γ̂_k), not log2((1+g−γ̂_k)/(1+γ̂_k)). Consequently the objective maximized by Algorithm 2 differs from (11) by Σ_k b_k log2(1+g). Because the b-update in (26) uses the threshold g_k^1 > −f_k^2, this additive term changes the b_k decision: users with γ_k ≤ γ̂_k can receive b_k = 1, contradicting Lemma 1's b_k^⋆ = 1{γ_k>γ̂_k}. Thus the stationarity and convergence statements do not pertain to the secrecy sum rate (7).
- [Section III.B.1, Eq. (18)] The W-subproblem matrix A_k omits the factors 1/σ̂_j^2 that appear in γ̂_k in (5). The eavesdropper term should be b_k(1+β_k)(1+g)^{-1} Σ_j (1/σ̂_j^2) g_j g_j^H, but Eq. (18) writes Σ_j g_j g_j^H without the noise weighting. As a result, the beamforming update (19) solves a different quadratic problem whenever the eavesdropper noise powers are not identical. This is an independent derivation error in a load-bearing block update; the T-subproblem in (22), by contrast, correctly retains the 1/σ̂_j^2 factors.
minor comments (4)
- [Section II.C, Eq. (8a)] Problem (8) is stated as min_{T,W} R, but the text and Lemma 1 describe a maximization of the secrecy sum rate. The objective should be max, not min.
- [Section II.B, Eq. (3)] The eavesdropper observation is written with h_k^H x(t) instead of g_j^H x(t), and the index k is reused inside the sum. This appears to be a typo but should be corrected for clarity.
- [Appendix B, Eq. (31)] The inequality ∥w_k∥^2 ≤ Σ_{i=1}^K w_i^H w_k ≤ p is not correct; the intended bound is ∥w_k∥^2 ≤ Σ_{i=1}^K ∥w_i∥^2 = tr(W^H W) ≤ p. Please fix the notation.
- [Overall] Some notation is introduced but not used (e.g., [N] in Section II.A), and there are minor typographical issues such as 'frquency' in the introduction. These should be cleaned up in any revision.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; the central derivation is analytic and does not reduce to its inputs (a possible Lemma 2/3 algebra defect is a correctness issue, not circularity).
full rationale
The claimed sum secrecy rate (7) is taken from the external wiretap-coding and superposition-coding results [11], [12], not defined from the optimization output. The parameter g in Lemma 2 is derived as an analytic Cauchy-Schwarz upper bound on γhat_k (Appendix B); it is not fit to any subset of data, and the subsequent FP/BCD updates minimize explicit surrogates rather than being chosen to reproduce a measured prediction. The b-block (26) and auxiliary updates (27) are closed-form from the stated objectives. The only self-references ([3], [4]) appear in the introduction as motivational examples and are not load-bearing for the optimization claim. Consequently no prediction is equivalent to an input by construction. A separate concern -- that the literal (11) may not match the β-recovered expression in Lemma 3 -- is a possible algebraic/equivalence error in the claimed derivation chain; under the stated rules an incorrect equivalence is distinct from circularity and is not scored here.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- Grid resolution Q =
1000
axioms (6)
- standard math Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the power constraint imply γhat_k ≤ g uniformly (Appendix B).
- standard math Fractional programming transformations from Shen-Yu [10] are valid for the considered non-concave objective.
- domain assumption Field-response channel model with fixed path gains and angles over the fading block (Section II-A).
- domain assumption Perfect CSI for both UTs and Eves is available at the BS via uplink pilots, because Eves are registered untrusted users (Section II-A).
- domain assumption The sum secrecy rate expression (7) is achievable for the multiuser wiretap channel with cooperating eavesdroppers (Section II-B).
- ad hoc to paper The constant g introduced in Lemma 2 is a valid uniform upper bound that does not depend on W or T.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Secure Multiuser Beamforming With Movable Antenna Arrays." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NN6N42KD
@misc{pith2026260105686,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Secure Multiuser Beamforming With Movable Antenna Arrays},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NN6N42KD}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.05686}
}
read the original abstract
A movable antenna (MA)-enabled secure multiuser transmission framework is developed to enhance physical-layer security. Novel expressions are derived to characterize the achievable sum secrecy rate based on the secure channel coding theorem. On this basis, a joint optimization algorithm for digital beamforming and MA placement is proposed to maximize the sum secrecy rate via fractional programming and block coordinate descent. In each iteration, every variable admits either a closed-form update or a low-complexity one-dimensional or bisection search, which yields an efficient implementation. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and show that the MA-enabled design achieves higher secrecy rates than conventional fixed-position antenna arrays.
Figures
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Secure Energy-Efficient Uplink Transmission in Movable-Element RIS-aided Systems with Movable Antennas and Artificial Noise
Joint optimization of movable base-station antennas, movable-RIS elements, and artificial noise is claimed to improve secure energy efficiency in a full-duplex uplink; the proposed H-GML meta-optimizer outperforms an ...
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
A tutorial on movable antennas for wi reless networks,
L. Zhu, W. Ma, W. Mei, Y . Zeng, Q. Wu, B. Ning, Z. Xiao, X. Sha o, J. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “A tutorial on movable antennas for wi reless networks,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 28, pp. 3002–3054, 2025
2025
-
[2]
The tri-hybrid MIMO architectur e,
R. W. Heath Jr, J. Carlson, N. V . Deshpande, M. R. Castella nos, M. Akrout, and C.-B. Chae, “The tri-hybrid MIMO architectur e,” IEEE Wireless Commun., Early Access, 2025
2025
-
[3]
Ena bling secure wireless communications via movable antennas,
Z. Cheng, N. Li, J. Zhu, X. She, C. Ouyang, and P . Chen, “Ena bling secure wireless communications via movable antennas,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP) , 2024, pp. 9186– 9190
2024
-
[4]
Movable antenna aided physical layer security with no eavesdropper CSI,
Z. Cheng, C. Ouyang, and X. Zhang, “Movable antenna aided physical layer security with no eavesdropper CSI,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP) , 2025, pp. 1–5
2025
-
[5]
Dee p learning- assisted jamming mitigation with movable antenna array,
X. Tang, Y . Jiang, J. Liu, Q. Du, D. Niyato, and Z. Han, “Dee p learning- assisted jamming mitigation with movable antenna array,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 9, pp. 14 865–14 870, Sep. 2025
2025
-
[6]
Beamforming design for physical security in movable a ntenna- aided ISAC systems: A reinforcement learning approach,
H. Le Hung, N. H. Huy, N. C. Luong, Q.-V . Pham, D. Niyato, an d N. T. Hoa, “Beamforming design for physical security in movable a ntenna- aided ISAC systems: A reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 18 163–18 167, Sep. 2025
2025
-
[7]
Mov able antenna assisted covert communication with wavelength-sc ale beam- forming resolution,
K. Wang, T.-X. Zheng, J. Shi, Z. Y ang, J. An, and Z. Li, “Mov able antenna assisted covert communication with wavelength-sc ale beam- forming resolution,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 19 864–19 869, Dec. 2025
2025
-
[8]
Secure analog beamforming for multi-user MISO systems wit h movable antennas,
W. Xiong, J. Lin, K. Zhong, L. Y ang, H. Liu, Q. Li, and C. Pan , “Secure analog beamforming for multi-user MISO systems wit h movable antennas,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19360 , 2025
arXiv 2025
-
[9]
Movable antenna empowe red physical layer security without Eve’s CSI: Joint optimizat ion of beam- forming and antenna positions,
Z. Feng, Y . Zhao, K. Y u, and D. Li, “Movable antenna empowe red physical layer security without Eve’s CSI: Joint optimizat ion of beam- forming and antenna positions,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 13 708–13 724, Dec. 2025
2025
-
[10]
Fractional programming for communic ation systems–Part I: Power control and beamforming,
K. Shen and W. Y u, “Fractional programming for communic ation systems–Part I: Power control and beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2616–2630, May 2018
2018
-
[11]
The Gaussian wire -tap chan- nel,
S. Leung-Y an-Cheong and M. Hellman, “The Gaussian wire -tap chan- nel,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 451–456, Jul. 1978
1978
-
[12]
El Gamal and Y .-H
A. El Gamal and Y .-H. Kim, Network Information Theory . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011
2011
-
[13]
Compressed sensing based ch annel estimation for movable antenna communications,
W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Compressed sensing based ch annel estimation for movable antenna communications,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2747–2751, Oct. 2023
2023
This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.