REVIEW 2 cited by
AI Systems in Text-Based Online Counselling: Ethical Considerations Across Three Implementation Approaches
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
AI Systems in Text-Based Online Counselling: Ethical Considerations Across Three Implementation Approaches
read the original abstract
Text-based online counselling scales across geographical and stigma barriers, yet faces practitioner shortages, lacks non-verbal cues and suffers inconsistent quality assurance. Whilst artificial intelligence offers promising solutions, its use in mental health counselling raises distinct ethical challenges. This paper analyses three AI implementation approaches - autonomous counsellor bots, AI training simulators and counsellor-facing augmentation tools. Drawing on professional codes, regulatory frameworks and scholarly literature, we identify four ethical principles - privacy, fairness, autonomy and accountability - and demonstrate their distinct manifestations across implementation approaches. Textual constraints may enable AI integration whilst requiring attention to implementation-specific hazards. This conceptual paper sensitises developers, researchers and practitioners to navigate AI-enhanced counselling ethics whilst preserving human values central to mental health support.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Transition-Matrix Regularization for Next Dialogue Act Prediction in Counselling Conversations
KL regularization aligning model predictions with empirical transition patterns improves macro-F1 by 9-42% in next dialogue act prediction on German counselling data and transfers to other datasets.
-
A Computational Ethical Framework for Financial Digital Phenotyping for Mental Health
Ethical rules for financial digital phenotyping can be written as deontic temporal constraints whose violations Z3 proves unsatisfiable inside the formal model.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.