Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Molecular pentaquarks composed of a ground-state octet baryon and a $P-$wave anticharmed meson

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Excited anticharmed mesons and ordinary baryons can bind into a family of loosely bound molecular pentaquarks, the paper predicts.

desk verdict A competent OBE survey of anticharmed D1/D2* molecules with all octet baryons; the candidate list is useful but the predictions are more regulator- and coupling-conditional than the abstract admits. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.12320 v2 pith:ZYBM47AG submitted 2026-01-18 hep-ph

Yu-Yue Cui , Rui Chen , Qi Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 12.39.Pn14.20.Pt14.40.Lb14.20.Jn
keywords molecularpentaquarksone-boson-exchangemodelanticharmedmesonsP-wavecoupled-channelSchrödingerequationheavyquarksymmetryexotichadronsstrangeness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts that the P-wave anticharmed mesons D̄1 and D̄2* can form loosely bound molecular pentaquarks when paired with ground-state octet baryons: nucleons, Λ, Σ, and Ξ. Working in a one-boson-exchange model that includes S- and P-wave interactions, S-D wave mixing, and coupled channels, the authors solve coupled Schrödinger equations and find bound solutions for many isospin and spin-parity assignments. The states sit a few MeV below their meson–baryon thresholds, with masses roughly from 3360 to 3781 MeV and radii around 1 fm or more, the expected size of hadronic molecules. If confirmed experimentally, the predicted spectrum would directly test the molecular picture of exotic hadrons and the role of coupled-channel attraction in forming them.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the one-boson-exchange effective potential derived from heavy-quark and chiral Lagrangians for the (D̄1, D̄2*) superfield and the SU(3) octet baryons. The potential sums scalar (σ), pseudoscalar (π, η), and vector (ρ, ω) exchanges; spin and tensor structures are encoded in numerical matrices A1–A8; and the coordinate-space potential is regulated by a monopole form factor with cutoff Λ. The coupled-channel Schrödinger equation — including S-D wave mixing, P-wave terms, and channel coupling — is what actually produces the bound states, and the cutoff Λ near 1 GeV is the selector that separates 'promising' molecular candidates from compact, non-molecular states.

What would settle it

Search for narrow pentaquark peaks in the predicted J^P channels just below the 3360 and 3401 MeV thresholds in high-energy collisions; a null result at production rates expected for such loosely bound molecules, or a lattice calculation showing no bound D̄1N or D̄2*N states in the isoscalar channels, would falsify the prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the P-wave anticharmed meson doublet (D̄1, D̄2*) — the spin-1 and spin-2 excited partners of the D̄ mesons, combined as a heavy-quark-symmetry superfield — binds to each of the ground-state octet baryons through one-boson exchange. Solving the coupled-channel Schrödinger equations with potentials built from σ, π, η, ρ, and ω exchange, the authors find a spectrum of loosely bound solutions with binding energies from a fraction of an MeV to tens of MeV and RMS radii at or above 1 fm. They list specific quantum numbers and thresholds: for example, D̄1N states at 3360 MeV with I(J^P) = 0(1/2±, 3/2+), 1(1/2±, 3/2+), and 0(3/2−); D̄2*N states at 3401 MeV; analogou

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rests on assuming the signs and strengths of the vector-meson coupling constants for the D̄1/D̄2* doublet are correct and that the regulator cutoff around 1 GeV is the physically right scale — change either, and the predicted bound states can disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The paper gives explicit I(J^P) assignments and mass thresholds, so experimentalists know which channels to search: D̄1N around 3360 MeV, D̄2*N around 3401 MeV, and strangeness partners up to 3781 MeV.
  • Coupled-channel effects are essential for some predictions: Λ-containing systems bind only when Σ channels are coupled in, with the resulting states dominated by the lower Λ threshold.
  • Isoscalar channels generally bind at smaller cutoffs than isovector channels, a systematic pattern attributed to stronger attraction in isoscalar potentials.
  • Several channels (such as most 7/2− configurations and some 5/2− channels) are predicted to have no bound states even at cutoff up to 2 GeV, giving negative predictions that are just as testable as the positive ones.
  • Observing any of the predicted states would support the molecular paradigm and the coupled-channel one-boson-exchange description of multiquark systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editor's inference: the same framework could naturally extend to bottom analogues (B̄1, B̄2*) where the larger reduced mass should make binding stronger, yielding a heavier family of molecular pentaquarks.
  • Editor's inference: even a null search in existing collider data would be informative; combining upper limits on production with the predicted binding energies could constrain the regulator cutoff and the adopted coupling constants.
  • Editor's inference: the paper's distinction between 'promising' loosely bound states and compact non-molecular solutions suggests the compact states may be regulator artifacts; a lattice or scattering calculation of the D̄1N and D̄2*N interactions could settle which of the predicted states are genuine.
  • Editor's inference: the predicted states should decay predominantly through the meson–baryon channels just below their thresholds, so measuring the line shapes near 3360, 3401, and partner thresholds would provide a sharper test than peak hunting alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the interaction of the P-wave anticharmed meson doublet (D̄1, D̄2*) with the ground-state octet baryons N, Λ, Σ, Ξ in a one-boson-exchange model. The model includes σ, π, η, ρ, and ω exchange, S- and P-wave channels, S–D mixing, and coupled-channel effects. The authors solve coupled Schrödinger equations and report a large set of loosely bound molecular pentaquark candidates with strangeness |S| = 0, 1, 2, with quantum numbers and masses in the range 3360–3781 MeV. The central claim is that these are genuine predictions that can guide experimental searches at LHCb and Belle II.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides a systematic catalog of previously unexplored anticharm molecular pentaquark candidates, with explicit J^P assignments and mass windows. The calculation is internally coherent: no experimental pentaquark data are fitted, and the tabulated states are true solutions of the coupled Schrödinger equation, not fits labeled as predictions. The qualitative ordering (isoscalar binds before isovector, S-wave before P-wave, hyperons requiring larger cutoffs) is physically reasonable. The paper would be a useful reference for future searches. However, the predictive strength is currently overstated because the two most load-bearing inputs — the vector-meson couplings of the (D̄1, D̄2*) doublet and the cutoff/identification criterion — are adopted without derivation, variation, or a robustness analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II, Eqs. (10)–(12), (19)–(26); Table II] The predicted spectrum is controlled by the sign and magnitude of the P-wave vector couplings. As written, C3 in Eq. (26) is proportional to λ″g_V = 7.38, and the vector-meson contributions enter the D̄1 and D̄2* potentials with opposite signs (Eq. (19) vs Eq. (22)); a sign flip in λ″g_V would therefore change attraction into repulsion in several dominant channels and could eliminate a large fraction of the bound states in Tables V–VIII. These constants, together with k = 0.78 and β″g_V = −6.50, are quoted from Refs. [48, 86–93] and are not derived, cross-checked, or varied. The paper needs either a derivation or renormalization argument fixing these couplings for the anticharmed P-wave doublet, or a sensitivity scan over their signs and magnitudes, before the word “predict” is warranted.
  2. [Sec. III and Tables V–VIII] The candidate selection is not consistently tied to the stated criterion. The text identifies Λ ≈ 1.00 GeV as the “reasonable” cutoff range (Sec. III), but many accepted candidates first bind only at much larger cutoffs: e.g., D̄1N 1(1/2+) at Λ = 1.33, 0(3/2−) at 1.28, 1(1/2−) at 1.48; D̄2*N 0(3/2−) at 1.91; and D̄2*Σ 1/2(3/2−) at 1.94–1.98. Conversely, Table VII lists D̄1Σ 1/2(3/2−) with E = −0.02 MeV and r_RMS = 3.31 fm, which does not meet the stated “several MeV”/≈1 fm loose-binding criterion, yet it is later counted as a candidate. The paper should either report a systematic sensitivity of every prediction to Λ and to the identification thresholds, or clearly separate states that bind below a predefined cutoff (e.g., 1.1 GeV) from those that require Λ up to 2 GeV. Without this, the “rich spectrum” claim is not robust.
  3. [Table VI and Sec. III B] The threshold masses in Table VI appear to have the Λ and Σ labels interchanged: m_D̄1Σ = 3537.68 MeV and m_D̄1Λ = 3615.15 MeV contradict the known Σ–Λ mass ordering and the text’s statement that the lower threshold is D̄1Λ. The reported wave-function composition for 1/2(1/2+), with the D̄1Λ component dominant, is consistent with D̄1Λ being the lowest channel, not with the numbers as printed. Please correct the labels and confirm that the numerical calculation uses the physical D̄1Λ threshold (~3537 MeV) as the lowest channel.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table I] The |0,0⟩ flavor wave function for the ¯T Ξ sector is written as (T0 n − T− p)/√2, which is the ¯T N wave function; it should involve Ξ0 and Ξ−, e.g., (T0 Ξ− − T− Ξ0)/√2. Although the isospin factors in Table III coincide for any two isodoublets, the error should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 1] As rendered in the manuscript, Fig. 1 is illegible and appears to contain only path fragments rather than a readable spectrum plot. Please provide a clean, properly embedded figure.
  3. [Tables V–VIII and Eq. (15)] There are minor typographical issues: “unites” should be “units” in the table captions, and “wher pseudoscalar” near Eq. (15) should be “where the pseudoscalar.”

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the claimed pentaquark spectrum is a genuine model output, not a fit or self-citation loop; only minor methodological self-citations appear.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The OBE potentials (Eqs. 17-24) are constructed from effective Lagrangians (Eqs. 3-15) with coupling constants assigned in Table II from prior determinations via nucleon-nucleon phenomenology, the quark model and SU(3) relations (Refs [48,90-93]); no anticharm pentaquark datum is used to adjust these inputs. Solving the coupled-channel Schrödinger equations then yields the bound-state solutions in Tables V-VIII as genuine outputs: quantum numbers, binding energies, RMS radii and channel probabilities are computed, not imposed. The cutoff Λ is not fitted to the target states; it is scanned over 0.8-2.0 GeV, and the 'promising' status of states with Λ ~ 1.0 GeV is anchored to the external deuteron/Bonn phenomenology (Refs [55,56]). Same-group citations such as [21,51,53,54,72] are methodological/contextual; the present paper carries out its own coupled-channel calculation rather than importing its predicted states from those papers, so the central claim does not reduce to a self-citation chain. Sensitivity of the spectrum to the sign of lambda''g_V or to the cutoff choice is a robustness/correctness concern, not a definitional circularity: the prediction is explicitly conditional on the adopted couplings and regulator convention. No 'prediction' here is equivalent by construction to an input, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced. The load-bearing inputs are (i) the HQSS/chiral Lagrangian coupling set (Table II) taken from Refs. [48, 86–93] without derivation for the P-wave doublet; (ii) the monopole form factor with scanned cutoff — the decisive freedom, since the 'promising candidate' criterion is defined in terms of Λ ≈ 1 GeV; (iii) the stability assumption for mesons whose widths exceed the predicted binding energies; and (iv) the identification thresholds (E, r_RMS) applied after the solutions are obtained. The coupling set and the cutoff criterion together, not the Schrödinger equation, carry the result.

free parameters (3)
  • Cutoff Λ (monopole form factor) = 0.78–1.98 GeV across states
    The decisive dial. Each state's 'existence' is a statement about the cutoff at which it binds; the 'promising' filter is defined as Λ ≈ 1 GeV, yet candidates at Λ up to 1.98 GeV are retained.
  • Couplings k = 0.78, β″g_V = −6.50, λ″g_V = 7.38, g_σ = 2.82 = as listed (Table II)
    Quoted from Refs. [48, 86–93] without derivation for the P-wave doublet; their signs control whether vector exchange attracts. Uncertainties not propagated.
  • Loosely-bound identification thresholds = E of several–tens MeV; r_RMS ≥ 1 fm
    Hand-chosen criteria applied after the solutions are obtained; they define which predicted bound states count as 'promising molecular candidates.'
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The (D̄₁, D̄₂*) doublet is described by the heavy-quark-symmetry superfield Lagrangian of Eq. (3) with the couplings of Table II.
    Invoked in Sec. II to build the OBE vertices; numerical values are taken from Refs. [48, 86–93] without derivation or uncertainty.
  • domain assumption One-boson exchange (σ, π, η, ρ, ω) saturates the T̄B interaction; quark-core or multi-meson effects beyond the monopole form factor are negligible.
    Sec. II; the total potential is exactly the sum in Eq. (16).
  • ad hoc to paper Monopole form factor with cutoff Λ ∈ [0.8, 2.0] GeV; Λ ≈ 1 GeV is 'reasonable'.
    Eq. (2) and Sec. III; the 'promising candidate' criterion is defined in terms of this choice.
  • domain assumption Baryon–meson couplings obtained from NN phenomenology via SU(3)/quark-model relations (Table II).
    Sec. II; all baryon-side couplings descend from g²_πNN/4π = 0.07, g²_ρNN/4π = 0.81, etc.
  • standard math Breit approximation (nonrelativistic reduction) for the T̄B potentials.
    Eq. (1); standard for this field.
  • domain assumption Anticharmed systems avoid quark-annihilation complications.
    Stated in the Introduction as the reason T̄B is 'simpler' than TB.
  • domain assumption The D̄₁ and D̄₂* mesons are treated as stable; their widths (≈27 and ≈47 MeV) are neglected.
    No width or observability discussion in Sec. III; binding energies of several MeV are comparable to these widths.
  • ad hoc to paper Identification criteria for 'loosely bound molecule': E of several–tens MeV and r_RMS ≥ 1 fm.
    Sec. III; applied after solving to select candidates and to discard compact bound states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Molecular pentaquarks composed of a ground-state octet baryon and a $P-$wave anticharmed meson." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZYBM47AG

@misc{pith2026260112320,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Molecular pentaquarks composed of a ground-state octet baryon and a $P-$wave anticharmed meson},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZYBM47AG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.12320}
}
abstract

In this work, we investigate the interactions between an excited anticharm meson doublet $(\bar{D}_1, \bar{D}_2^*)$ and ground-state octet baryons $(N, \Lambda, \Sigma, \Xi)$ with the aim of identifying possible molecular pentaquark states. A systematic analysis is performed within the one-boson-exchange model, which incorporates both $S$ and $P$-wave interactions, $S$-$D$ mixing, and coupled-channel effects. By solving the Schr\"{o}dinger equations, we can predict a rich spectrum of loosely bound anticharm molecular pentaquarks with strangeness $|S| = 0, 1, 2$. Our results provide specific quantum number assignments and mass range predictions to guide future experimental searches at facilities such as LHCb and Belle II. The discovery of such states would significantly enrich the hadron spectrum and serve as a critical test of theoretical models for hadronic interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.12320 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Predictions of anti-charm pentaquarks. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Prediction of doubly-charm hadronic molecules with double strange quarks

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    One-boson-exchange model predicts D_s1 bar D_s1, D_s1 bar D_s2* and D_s2* bar D_s2* states as hidden-charm hidden-strangeness molecular tetraquarks plus analogous doubly-charm candidates.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    ¯T N molecules: ¯D1N states with I(JP) = 0(1/2±, 3/2±), 1(1/2±, 3/2+); ¯D∗ 2N states with 0(1 /2−, 3/2±, 5/2±), 1(3/2±, 5/2+)

  2. [2]

    A systematic analysis is performed within the one-boson-exc hange model, which incorporates both S -wave and P-wave interactions, S -D wave mixing, and coupled-channel e ffects

    and ground-state octet baryons ( N, Λ, Σ, Ξ) with the aim of identifying possible molecular pentaquark states. A systematic analysis is performed within the one-boson-exc hange model, which incorporates both S -wave and P-wave interactions, S -D wave mixing, and coupled-channel e ffects. By solving the Schr¨ odinger equations, we can predict a rich spectru...

    1979

  3. [3]

    Compared to the well-studied Σc ¯D(∗) systems, the ¯T B config- urations present distinct characteristics

    and an octet baryon B = (N, Λ, Σ, Ξ) to predict possible ¯T B molecular pentaquarks. Compared to the well-studied Σc ¯D(∗) systems, the ¯T B config- urations present distinct characteristics. On the one hand , the larger number of light quarks in the ¯T B systems may enhance the contributions from light meson exchange. On the other hand, the relatively sma...

    arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    The pseudo - Goldstone and vector meson matrices are ξ = exp(iP/ fπ) and ρµ = igVVµ/ √ 2, respectively

    with light mesons are constructed with heavy quark symmetry and chi- ral symmetry [ 86–89] as follows L = g′′ σ ⟨ T (Q)µ b σT (Q) bµ ⟩ + ik ⟨ T (Q)µ a A/abγ5T (Q) bµ ⟩ − ⟨ iT (Q) aλ ( β′′vµ(Vµ −ρµ) −λ′′σµνFµν(ρ) ) ab T (Q)λ b ⟩ ,(3) where the axial current Aµ = 1 2 ( ξ†∂µξ −ξ∂µξ† ) µ, vector current Vµ = 1 2 ( ξ†∂µξ +ξ∂µξ† ) µ, and vector meson field stren...

  5. [5]

    ¯T Σ molecules: ¯D1Σ states with 1/2(1/2±, 3/2±), 3 /2(1/2±, 3/2+); ¯D∗ 2Σ states with 1 /2(1/2−, 3/2±, 5/2±), 3 /2(3/2±, 5/2+); ¯D1Λ/ ¯D∗ 2Λ/ ¯D1Σ/ ¯D∗ 2Σ coupled states with 1/2(1/2±, 3/2+) and ¯D∗ 2Λ/ ¯D1Σ/ ¯D∗ 2Σ coupled states with 1/2(3/2+, 5/2+)

  6. [6]

    ¯T Ξ molecules: ¯D1Ξ states with 0(1/2±, 3/2+), (3/2+); ¯D∗ 2Ξ states with 0(3/2±, 5/2+), 1(5/2+). In addition, our analysis demonstrates that the coupled cha n- nel effects contribute actively to the formation of single chan- nel molecular states and play an important role in the forma- tion of coupled channel molecular states. Thus, experiment al 10 /s51...

  7. [7]

    Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys

    M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214-215 (1964)

    1964

  8. [8]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. V ersion 1 10.17181/CERN-TH-401 (1964)

    doi:10.17181/cern-th-401 1964

Show all 99 references
  1. [9]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking. V ersion 2 10.17181/CERN-TH-412 (1964). 11

    1964 doi

  2. [10]

    Strottman, Multi - Quark Baryons and the MIT Bag Model, Phys

    D. Strottman, Multi - Quark Baryons and the MIT Bag Model, Phys. Rev. D 20, 748-767 (1979)

    1979

  3. [11]

    H. J. Lipkin, New Possibilities for Exotic Hadrons: An- ticharmed Strange Baryons, Phys. Lett. B 195, 484-488 (1987)

    1987

  4. [12]

    Gignoux, B

    C. Gignoux, B. Silvestre-Brac and J. M. Richard, Possibi lity of Stable Multi - Quark Baryons, Phys. Lett. B 193, 323 (1987)

    1987

  5. [13]

    Nakano et al

    T. Nakano et al. [LEPS], Evidence for a narrow S = +1 baryon resonance in photoproduction from the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 012002 (2003)

    2003

  6. [14]

    K. H. Hicks, On the conundrum of the pentaquark, Eur. Phys. J. H 37, 1-31 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    Alt et al

    C. Alt et al. [NA49], Observation of an exotic S = -2, Q = -2 baryon resonance in proton proton collisions at the CERN SPS , Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 042003 (2004)

    2004

  8. [16]

    Aktas et al

    A. Aktas et al. [H1], Evidence for a narrow anti-charmed baryon state, Phys. Lett. B 588, 17 (2004)

    2004

  9. [17]

    H. G. Fischer and S. Wenig, Are there S = -2 pentaquarks?, Eur. Phys. J. C 37, 133-140 (2004)

    2004

  10. [18]

    M. I. Adamovich et al. [W A89], Search for the exotic Xi– (1860) resonance in 340-GeV /c Sigma- nucleus interactions, Phys. Rev. C 70, 022201 (2004)

    2004

  11. [19]

    Chekanov et al

    S. Chekanov et al. [ZEUS], Search for a narrow charmed baryonic state decaying to D∗± p∓ in ep collisions at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 38, 29-41 (2004)

    2004

  12. [20]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Observation of J/ψp Resonances Con- sistent with Pentaquark States in Λ0 b → J/ψK− p Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) no.22, 222001 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    R. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Hidden-charm molec- ular pentaquarks and their charm-strange partners, Nucl. Phys. A 954, 406-421 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    C. J. Xiao, Y . Huang, Y . B. Dong, L. S. Geng and D. Y . Chen, Exploring the molecular scenario of Pc(4312) , Pc(4440) , an d Pc(4457), Phys. Rev. D 100 no.1, 014022 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    K. Chen, R. Chen, L. Meng, B. Wang and S. L. Zhu, Systematics of the heavy flavor hadronic molecules, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no.7, 581 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    H. W. Ke, F. Lu, H. Pang, X. H. Liu and X. Q. Li, Study on the possible molecular states composed of Λc ¯D∗, Σc ¯D∗, Ξc ¯D∗ and Ξ′ c ¯D∗ in the Bethe–Salpeter frame based on the pentaquark states Pc(4440), Pc(4457) and Pcs(4459), Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no.11, 1074 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    H. Xu, Q. Li, C. H. Chang and G. L. Wang, Recently ob- served Pc as molecular states and possible mixture of Pc(4457), Phys. Rev. D 101 no.5, 054037 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    R. Chen, Z. F. Sun, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Strong LHCb evi- dence supporting the existence of the hidden-charm molecul ar pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 100 no.1, 011502 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    M. Z. Liu, Y . W. Pan, F. Z. Peng, M. S´ anchez S´ anchez, L. S. Geng, A. Hosaka and M. Pavon V alderrama, Emergence of a complete heavy-quark spin symmetry multiplet: seven molecular pentaquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 no.24, 242001 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    He, Study of Pc(4457), Pc(4440), and Pc(4312) in a quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation approach, Eur

    J. He, Study of Pc(4457), Pc(4440), and Pc(4312) in a quasipotential Bethe-Salpeter equation approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no.5, 393 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Yamaguchi, H

    Y . Yamaguchi, H. Garc´ ıa-Tecocoatzi, A. Giachino, A. Hosaka, E. Santopinto, S. Takeuchi and M. Takizawa, Pc pentaquarks with chiral tensor and quark dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 101 no.9, 091502 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    T. J. Burns and E. S. Swanson, Molecular in- terpretation of the Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) states, Phys. Rev. D 100 no.11, 114033 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Y . H. Lin and B. S. Zou, Strong decays of the latest LHCb pentaquark candidates in hadronic molecule pictures, Phys. Rev. D 100 no.5, 056005 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves and E. Oset, Heavy quark spin symmetric molecular states from ¯D(∗)Σ(∗) c and other cou- pled channels in the light of the recent LHCb pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 100 no.1, 014021 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Karliner and J

    M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, New strange pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 106 no.3, 036024 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    X. K. Dong, F. K. Guo and B. S. Zou, A survey of heavy- antiheavy hadronic molecules, Progr. Phys. 41, 65-93 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    F. L. Wang and X. Liu, Emergence of molecular-type characteristic spectrum of hidden-charm pentaquark with strangeness embodied in the P ψsΛ(4338) and Pcs(4459), Phys. Lett. B 835, 137583 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    M. J. Yan, F. Z. Peng, M. S´ anchez S´ anchez and M. Pavon V alderrama, PψsΛ(4338) pentaquark and its partners in the molecular picture, Phys. Rev. D 107 no.7, 7 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Fern´ andez-Ram´ ırezet al

    C. Fern´ andez-Ram´ ırezet al. [JPAC], Interpretation of the LHCb Pc(4312)+ Signal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 no.9, 092001 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    M. L. Du, V . Baru, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, J. A. Oller and Q. Wang, Interpretation of the LHCb Pc States as Hadronic Molecules and Hints of a Narrow Pc(4380), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 no.7, 072001 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen and S. L. Zhu, Possible in- terpretations of the Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457),” Phys. Rev. D 100 no.5, 051501 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Z. H. Guo and J. A. Oller, Anatomy of the newly ob- served hidden-charm pentaquark states: Pc(4312), Pc(4440) and Pc(4457), Phys. Lett. B 793, 144-149 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    B. Wang, L. Meng and S. L. Zhu, Hidden-charm and hidden- bottom molecular pentaquarks in chiral e ffective field theory, JHEP 11, 108 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G. J. Wang and S. L. Zhu, The hidden charm pentaquark states and Σc ¯D(∗) interaction in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 no.1, 014031 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    M. B. V oloshin, Some decay properties of hidden- charm pentaquarks as baryon-meson molecules, Phys. Rev. D 100 no.3, 034020 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Z. G. Wang and X. Wang, Analysis of the strong decays of th e Pc(4312) as a pentaquark molecular state with QCD sum rules, Chin. Phys. C 44, 103102 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Gutsche and V

    T. Gutsche and V . E. Lyubovitskij, Structure and decays of hid- den heavy pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 100 no.9, 094031 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    R. Zhu, X. Liu, H. Huang and C. F. Qiao, Analyzing dou- bly heavy tetra- and penta-quark states by variational meth od, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134869 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    G. J. Wang, L. Y . Xiao, R. Chen, X. H. Liu, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Probing hidden-charm decay properties of Pc states in a molecular scenario, Phys. Rev. D 102 no.3, 036012 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    M. L. Du, V . Baru, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, J. A. Oller and Q. Wang, Revisiting the nature of the P c pen- taquarks, JHEP 08, 157 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    C. W. Shen, D. R¨ onchen, U. G. Meißner, B. S. Zou and Y . F. Wang, Exploration of the LHCb Pc states and possible resonances in a unitary coupled-channel model, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 no.7, 764 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Molina, C

    R. Molina, C. W. Xiao and E. Oset, J/ψ reaction mechanisms and suppression in the nuclear medium, Phys. Rev. C 86, 014604 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    Z. C. Yang, Z. F. Sun, J. He, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, The possib le hidden-charm molecular baryons composed of anti-charmed meson and charmed baryon, Chin. Phys. C 36, 6-13 (2012) . 12

    2012

  45. [53]

    J. J. Wu, R. Molina, E. Oset and B. S. Zou, Prediction of na r- row N∗ and Λ∗ resonances with hidden charm above 4 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 232001 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    W. L. Wang, F. Huang, Z. Y . Zhang and B. S. Zou,Σc ¯D and Λc ¯D states in a chiral quark model, Phys. Rev. C 84, 015203 (2011)

    2011

  47. [55]

    Karliner and J

    M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, New Exotic Meson and Baryon Resonances from Doubly-Heavy Hadronic Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 no.12, 122001 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    X. Q. Li and X. Liu, A possible global group structure for exotic states, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 no.12, 3198 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    R. Chen, Z. F. Sun, X. Liu and S. M. Gerasyuta, Predicting ex- otic molecular states composed of nucleon and P-wave charmed meson, Phys. Rev. D 90 no.3, 034011 (2014)

    2014

  50. [58]

    H. Y . Cheng and K. C. Yang, Charmless Hadronic B Decays into a Tensor Meson, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034001 (2011)

    2011

  51. [59]

    Y . Y . Cui, X. M. Tang, Q. Huang and R. Chen, Emergence of charm-strange dibaryons with negative parity via baryon–baryon interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) no.12, 1460

    2025

  52. [60]

    X. M. Tang, L. c. Sheng, Q. Huang and R. Chen, The recoil corrections, correlation functions and possible double-s trange hadronic molecules,” Phys. Lett. B 870 (2025), 139896

    2025

  53. [61]

    N. A. Tornqvist, From the Deuteron to Deusons, an Analysis of Deuteron-like Meson Meson Bound States, Z. Phys. C 61, 525 (1994)

    1994

  54. [62]

    N. A. Tornqvist, On Deusons or Deuteron-like Meson Meso n Bound States, Nuovo Cim. A 107, 2471 (1994)

    1994

  55. [63]

    J. Y . Huo, L. C. Sheng, R. Chen and X. Liu, Predicting possible molecular states of nucleons with Ξc, Ξ∗ c, and Ξ′ c, Phys. Rev. D 110 no.5, 054040 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Y . R. Liu and M. Oka, ΛcN bound states revisited, Phys. Rev. D 85, 014015 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    Y . R. Liu, X. Liu, W. Z. Deng, and S. L. Zhu, Is X(3872) really a molecular state?, Eur. Phys. J. C 56, 63 (2008)

    2008

  58. [66]

    C. E. Thomas and F. E. Close, Is X(3872) a molecule?, Phys. Rev. D 78, 034007 (2008)

    2008

  59. [67]

    X. Liu, Z. G. Luo, Y . R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, X(3872) and other possible heavy molecular states, Eur. Phys. J. C 61, 411 (2009)

    2009

  60. [68]

    I. W. Lee, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, and V . E. Lyubovit- skij, X(3872) as a molecular DD∗ state in a potential model, Phys. Rev. D 80, 094005 (2009)

    2009

  61. [69]

    R. Chen, X. Liu, X. Q. Li and S. L. Zhu, Identifying exotic hidden-charm pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 132002 (2015)

    2015

  62. [70]

    Chen and X

    R. Chen and X. Liu, Is the newly reported X(5568) a B ¯K molec- ular state?, Phys. Rev. D 94, 034006 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    K. Chen, R. Chen, Z. F. Sun and X. Liu, ¯KΛ molec- ular explanation to the newly observed Ξ(1620)0, Phys. Rev. D 100, 074006 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    R. Chen, Q. Huang, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Predict- ing another doubly charmed molecular resonance T ′ cc(3876), Phys. Rev. D 104, 114042 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Chen, Can the newly reported Pcs(4459) be a strange hidden-charm Ξc ¯D∗ molecular pentaquark?, Phys

    R. Chen, Can the newly reported Pcs(4459) be a strange hidden-charm Ξc ¯D∗ molecular pentaquark?, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054007 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Chen and Q

    R. Chen and Q. Huang, Zcs(3985)−: A strange hidden-charm tetraquark resonance or not?, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034008 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    Chen and Q

    R. Chen and Q. Huang, Charmoniumlike reso- nant explanation on the newly observed X(3960), Phys. Lett. B 846, 138254 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    Chen and X

    R. Chen and X. Liu, Mass behavior of hidden-charm open- strange pentaquarks inspired by the established Pc molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014029 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    F. L. Wang, R. Chen and X. Liu, Prediction of hidden-charm pentaquarks with double strangeness, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034014 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    F. L. Wang, R. Chen, Z. W. Liu and X. Liu, Probing new types of Pc states inspired by the interaction between S - wave charmed baryon and anti-charmed meson in a ¯T doublet, Phys. Rev. C 101, 025201 (2020)

    2020

  71. [79]

    J. He, X. Liu, Z. F. Sun and S. L. Zhu, Zc(4025) as the hadronic molecule with hidden charm, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2635 (2013)

    2013

  72. [80]

    N. Li, Z. F. Sun, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Coupled-channel analysis of the possible D(∗)D(∗), B (∗) B (∗) and D(∗)B (∗) molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 88, 114008 (2013)

    2013

  73. [81]

    Li and S

    N. Li and S. L. Zhu, Hadronic molecular states composed o f heavy flavor baryons, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014020 (2012)

    2012

  74. [82]

    Z. F. Sun, X. Liu, M. Nielsen and S. L. Zhu, Hadronic molecules with both open charm and bottom, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094008 (2012)

    2012

  75. [83]

    Z. F. Sun, J. He, X. Liu, Z. G. Luo and S. L. Zhu, Zb(10610)± and Zb(10650)± as the B∗ ¯B and B∗ ¯B∗ molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 84, 054002 (2011)

    2011

  76. [84]

    N. Lee, Z. G. Luo, X. L. Chen and S. L. Zhu, Possible deuteronlike molecular states composed of heavy baryons, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014031 (2011)

    2011

  77. [85]

    Liu and S

    X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Y(4143) is probably a molecular part ner of Y(3930), Phys. Rev. D 80, 017502 (2009)

    2009

  78. [86]

    X. Liu, Y . R. Liu, W. Z. Deng and S. L. Zhu, Z+(4430) as a D′ 1D∗(D1D∗) molecular state, Phys. Rev. D 77, 094015 (2008)

    2008

  79. [87]

    P . Chen, Z. W. Liu, Z. L. Zhang, S. Q. Luo, F. L. Wang, J. Z. Wang and X. Liu, Role of electromagnetic interactions i n the X(3872) and its analogs, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094002 (2024)

    2024

  80. [88]

    Y . R. Liu, M. Oka, M. Takizawa, X. Liu, W. Z. Deng and S. L. Zhu, D ¯D production and their interactions, Phys. Rev. D 82, 014011 (2010)

    2010

  81. [89]

    X. D. Yang, F. L. Wang, Z. W. Liu and X. Liu, Newly observed X(4630): a new charmoniumlike molecule, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 807 (2021)

    2021

  82. [90]

    R. Q. Qian, F. L. Wang and X. Liu, Finding interaction mechanism between exotic molecule and conventional hadron , Phys. Lett. B 862, 139329 (2025)

    2025

  83. [91]

    He and X

    J. He and X. Liu, The open-charm radiative and pionic decays of molecular charmonium Y(4274), Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1986 (2012)

    1986

  84. [92]

    M. B. Wise, Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons cont aining a heavy quark, Phys. Rev. D 45, R2188 (1992)

    1992

  85. [93]

    Casalbuoni, A

    R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio, and G. Nardulli, Light vector resonances in the e ffective chiral Lagrangian for heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B 292, 371 (1992)

    1992

  86. [94]

    Casalbuoni, A

    R. Casalbuoni, A. Deandrea, N. Di Bartolomeo, R. Gatto, F. Feruglio, and G. Nardulli, Phenomenology of heavy meson chiral Lagrangians, Phys. Rep. 281, 145 (1997)

    1997

  87. [95]

    T. M. Yan, H. Y . Cheng, C. Y . Cheung, G. L. Lin, Y . C. Lin, and H. L. Y u, Heavy quark symmetry and chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1148 (1992)

    1992

  88. [96]

    F. L. Wang, R. Chen, Z. W. Liu and X. Liu, Possible triple- charm molecular pentaquarks from ΞccD1/ΞccD∗ 2 interactions, Phys. Rev. D 99 no.5, 054021 (2019)

    2019

  89. [97]

    Machleidt, The High precision, charge depen- dent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential (CD-Bonn), Phys

    R. Machleidt, The High precision, charge depen- dent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential (CD-Bonn), Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001 (2001)

    2001

  90. [98]

    Machleidt, K

    R. Machleidt, K. Holinde and C. Elster, The Bonn Me- son Exchange Model for the Nucleon Nucleon Interaction, Phys. Rept. 149, 1 (1987) . 13

    1987

  91. [99]

    X. Cao, B. S. Zou and H. S. Xu, Phenomenological analysis of the double pion production in nucleon-nucleon collisions u p to 2.2 GeV ,Phys. Rev. C 81, 065201 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.