pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.14365 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: no theorem link

Exciton-Anyon Binding in Fractional Chern Insulators: Spectral Fingerprints

Tianhong Lu , Luiz H. Santos
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords fractional Chern insulatorsexciton-quasihole bindingquasiholesmoiré TMD heterostructuresexact diagonalizationkagome latticeanyonsphotoluminescence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Excitons bind to quasiholes in fractional Chern insulators despite repulsive interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines an interacting fermion-boson system where an exciton couples to a quasihole in a fractional Chern insulator at one-third filling. Using exact diagonalization on a kagome lattice model with tunable exciton dispersion, it finds that bound states appear as isolated low-energy levels in the spectrum. These states form because the exciton feels a residual attraction to the charge depletion around the quasihole, even though the direct electron-exciton force is repulsive. Reducing the exciton kinetic energy strengthens the binding. The work models moiré TMD heterostructures and estimates binding energies of 0.8 to 1.2 meV, suggesting they could be seen in photoluminescence measurements.

Core claim

We demonstrate the emergence of exciton–quasihole bound states controlled by the repulsive electron–exciton interaction V_FB and the exciton kinetic energy t_B. These states appear as low-lying levels in the fermion–boson spectrum, well separated from the scattering continuum, and arise despite repulsive interactions due to a residual attraction to the local charge depletion associated with a quasihole.

What carries the argument

The kagome-lattice fermion-boson model hosting a fractional Chern insulator at filling 1/3 and a mobile exciton with tunable dispersion from parabolic to flatband, solved via exact diagonalization.

If this is right

  • Reducing exciton kinetic energy t_B favors interaction-dominated binding over kinetic delocalization.
  • Binding energies of 0.8-1.2 meV in twisted bilayer MoTe2 proximitized by excitonic layers fall within reach of optical spectroscopy.
  • The fermion-boson spectrum provides a concrete signature for exciton-quasihole composites in fractional Chern insulators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Optical probes could distinguish anyonic quasiholes through the presence or absence of these bound-state lines.
  • Gate tuning of layer separation in heterostructures offers a way to control the exciton kinetic energy and thus the binding strength.
  • Similar bound states might appear when coupling excitons to quasiparticles at other fractional fillings or in different lattice models.

Load-bearing premise

The exciton dispersion can be tuned independently of the purely repulsive electron-exciton interaction, and exact diagonalization on finite clusters captures the binding without large finite-size artifacts.

What would settle it

If photoluminescence measurements on moiré TMD heterostructures at one-third filling show no isolated low-energy peaks separated from the continuum, the predicted bound states would not exist.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.14365 by Luiz H. Santos, Tianhong Lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The exciton–FCI interacting system. (a) Schematic of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) FCI spectra at 1/3 filling for the 3x5 kagome lat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Exciton-quasihole interacting spectra (blue and red cir [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Transition--metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) uniquely combine topological electronic states realized without external magnetic fields with a strong optical response arising from long--lived excitons. Motivated by this confluence, we investigate an interacting fermion--boson system formed by coupling an exciton to a quasihole of a fractional Chern insulator (FCI) at filling fraction $1/3$. We introduce a kagome--lattice fermion--boson model hosting an electronic FCI and a mobile exciton whose dispersion is tunable from a parabolic band to a flatband. Using exact diagonalization, we demonstrate the emergence of exciton--quasihole bound states controlled by the repulsive electron--exciton interaction $V_{\mathrm{FB}}$ and the exciton kinetic energy $t_{\mathrm{B}}$. These states appear as low--lying levels in the fermion--boson spectrum, well separated from the scattering continuum, and arise despite repulsive interactions due to a residual attraction to the local charge depletion associated with a quasihole. Reducing $t_{\mathrm{B}}$ enhances this effect by favoring interaction--dominated binding. Our results provide a model description of moir\'e TMD heterostructures, including fractional Chern insulating twisted bilayer MoTe$_2$ proximitized by excitonic TMD heterobilayers, where we estimate exciton--quasihole binding energy scales of $0.8$--$1.2$~meV, placing these effects within reach of photoluminescence spectroscopy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a kagome-lattice fermion-boson model coupling a mobile exciton to a quasihole in a 1/3 fractional Chern insulator. Using exact diagonalization, it shows that repulsive electron-exciton interactions V_FB combined with tunable exciton hopping t_B produce low-lying exciton-quasihole bound states that remain separated from the scattering continuum; the binding is attributed to residual attraction from the quasihole's local charge depletion and is strengthened when t_B is reduced. Binding energies of 0.8-1.2 meV are estimated for moiré TMD heterostructures and proposed as observable in photoluminescence.

Significance. If the reported spectral separation survives the thermodynamic limit, the work supplies a minimal model for exciton-anyon binding in fractional Chern insulators realized in twisted bilayer MoTe2, predicts concrete energy scales accessible to optical spectroscopy, and identifies a mechanism by which binding can occur despite purely repulsive microscopic interactions. The tunable exciton dispersion (parabolic to flatband) adds a useful control parameter for future studies of anyonic optical signatures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results/Methods] Results and Methods sections: The central claim that bound states appear as low-lying levels well separated from the scattering continuum for repulsive V_FB when t_B is reduced rests on exact-diagonalization spectra, yet the manuscript provides no cluster sizes, no finite-size scaling of the putative binding energy, and no explicit checks (e.g., quasihole-exciton correlation functions) that the separation persists beyond small kagome clusters. On finite clusters the many-body continuum is discretized and boundary-induced level repulsion can open spurious gaps; without these controls the residual-attraction interpretation remains vulnerable to finite-size artifacts.
  2. [§4] §4 (or equivalent spectral analysis section): The identification of the scattering continuum and the assignment of specific eigenstates as bound is not accompanied by quantitative criteria (e.g., momentum-resolved level statistics, participation ratios, or comparison to the non-interacting continuum edge). This makes it difficult to assess how robust the reported separation is against changes in system size or boundary conditions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that states 'arise despite repulsive interactions' would benefit from a brief parenthetical reminder that the microscopic V_FB is repulsive while the effective binding is induced by the quasihole charge depletion.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text: Notation for the exciton dispersion (parabolic vs. flatband limits) and the precise definition of t_B should be made uniform between the model Hamiltonian and the numerical results to avoid ambiguity when readers compare different panels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested details and diagnostics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results/Methods] Results and Methods sections: The central claim that bound states appear as low-lying levels well separated from the scattering continuum for repulsive V_FB when t_B is reduced rests on exact-diagonalization spectra, yet the manuscript provides no cluster sizes, no finite-size scaling of the putative binding energy, and no explicit checks (e.g., quasihole-exciton correlation functions) that the separation persists beyond small kagome clusters. On finite clusters the many-body continuum is discretized and boundary-induced level repulsion can open spurious gaps; without these controls the residual-attraction interpretation remains vulnerable to finite-size artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that cluster sizes, scaling information, and correlation diagnostics should be included. In the revised manuscript we will specify the kagome cluster sizes used, add quasihole-exciton correlation functions for the candidate bound states, and present results from multiple available sizes to illustrate the persistence of the separation and its strengthening with reduced t_B. While a complete extrapolation to the thermodynamic limit lies beyond exact diagonalization, the consistent trend across accessible clusters supports the residual-attraction mechanism rather than a pure finite-size artifact. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (or equivalent spectral analysis section): The identification of the scattering continuum and the assignment of specific eigenstates as bound is not accompanied by quantitative criteria (e.g., momentum-resolved level statistics, participation ratios, or comparison to the non-interacting continuum edge). This makes it difficult to assess how robust the reported separation is against changes in system size or boundary conditions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative criteria will improve clarity. The revised manuscript will include momentum-resolved spectra, participation ratios for low-lying versus higher states, and an explicit comparison of the lowest levels to the estimated non-interacting continuum edge. These additions will provide a more rigorous basis for assigning bound states and allow readers to evaluate robustness against size and boundary variations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct numerical outputs from the model Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper defines a kagome-lattice fermion-boson Hamiltonian with tunable parameters V_FB (repulsive interaction) and t_B (exciton hopping), then computes its spectrum via exact diagonalization on finite clusters. Bound states are identified directly as the lowest eigenvalues lying below the scattering continuum in these spectra. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction; no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz; the separation from the continuum is an output of the diagonalization, not a tautological re-expression of the inputs. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard lattice Hamiltonian for FCIs plus a tunable exciton band and a repulsive density-density coupling; no new entities are postulated and the only adjustable quantities are the two interaction/kinetic parameters that are scanned explicitly.

free parameters (2)
  • V_FB
    Strength of the repulsive electron-exciton interaction, scanned to control binding.
  • t_B
    Exciton hopping/kinetic energy, tuned from parabolic to flatband dispersion.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The kagome lattice at 1/3 filling supports a fractional Chern insulator with quasiholes carrying fractional charge.
    Standard assumption drawn from prior FCI literature; invoked to define the quasihole sector.
  • domain assumption Exact diagonalization on finite clusters accurately identifies bound states separated from the continuum.
    Numerical method assumption required for spectral interpretation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1552 out tokens · 26925 ms · 2026-05-16T12:02:29.677826+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exciton-roton mode in moir\'e fractional Chern insulators

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Hybridization between magneto-roton and moiré interband excitations in twisted MoTe2 creates an optically active exciton-roton mode with a characteristic roton minimum that is absent in continuum fractional quantum Ha...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    and Abelian fractional statistics [3, 4]. Although first identified in high-magnetic-field fractional quan- tum Hall (FQH) systems, such phases have now been realized as fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) in moiré transition-metaldichalcogenides(TMDs)[5–8]andmul- tilayer graphene [9], demonstrating that anyonic mat- ter can arise without external magnetic...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    X.-G.Wen,Quantumfieldtheoryofmany-bodysystems: From the origin of sound to an origin of light and electrons(Oxford university press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    R. B. Laughlin, Physical Review Letters50, 1395 (1983)

    work page 1983

  4. [4]

    B. I. Halperin, Physical Review Letters52, 1583 (1984)

    work page 1984

  5. [5]

    D.Arovas,J.R.Schrieffer, andF.Wilczek,Physicalreview letters53, 722 (1984)

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtz- mann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe,et al., Nature622, 63 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Knüppel, C. Vaswani, K.Watanabe,T.Taniguchi,K.F.Mak, andJ.Shan,Nature 622, 69 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu,et al., Nature622, 74 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Taniguchi, B

    F.Xu,Z.Sun,T.Jia,C.Liu,C.Xu,C.Li,Y.Gu,K.Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong,et al., Physical Review X13, 031037 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Z.Lu,T.Han,Y.Yao,A.P.Reddy,J.Yang,J.Seo,K.Watan- abe,T.Taniguchi,L.Fu, andL.Ju,Nature626,759(2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X.Marie,T.Amand, andB.Urbaszek,ReviewsofModern Physics90, 021001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    E.C.Regan,D.Wang,E.Y.Paik,Y.Zeng,L.Zhang,J.Zhu, A.H.MacDonald,H.Deng, andF.Wang,NatureReviews Materials7, 778 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Mostaan, N

    N. Mostaan, N. Goldman, A. İmamoğlu, and F. Grusdt, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.08933 (2025). 6

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Wagner and T

    G. Wagner and T. Neupert, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.08928 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Hayakawa, K

    J. Hayakawa, K. Muraki, and G. Yusa, Nature Nanotech- nology8, 31 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    K. Tran, G. Moody, F. Wu, X. Lu, J. Choi, K. Kim, A. Rai, D. A. Sanchez, J. Quan, A. Singh, J. Embley, A. Zepeda, M. Campbell, T. Autry, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, N. Lu, S. K. Banerjee, K. L. Silverman, S. Kim, E. Tutuc, L. Yang, A. H. MacDonald, and X. Li, Nature567, 71 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Kunstmann, F

    J. Kunstmann, F. Mooshammer, P. Nagler, A. Chaves, F.Stein, N.Paradiso, G.Plechinger, C.Strunk, C.Schüller, G. Seifert, D. R. Reichman, and T. Korn, Nature Physics 14, 801 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    E. M. Alexeev, D. A. Ruiz-Tijerina, M. Danovich, M. J. Hamer, D. J. Terry, P. K. Nayak, S. Ahn, S. Pak, J. Lee, J. I. Sohn, M. R. Molas, M. Koperski, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Novoselov, R. V. Gorbachev, H. S. Shin, V. I. Fal’ko, and A. I. Tartakovskii, Nature567, 81 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    M. Förg, A. S. Baimuratov, S. Y. Kruchinin, I. A. Vovk, J. Scherzer, J. Förste, V. Funk, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. Högele, Nature Communications12, 1656 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Xiong, J

    R. Xiong, J. H. Nie, S. L. Brantly, P. Hays, R. Sailus, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, and C. Jin, Science 380, 860 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    H. Park, J. Zhu, X. Wang, Y. Wang, W. Holtzmann, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yan, L. Fu, T. Cao,et al., Nature Physics19, 1286 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    B.Gao,D.G.Suárez-Forero,S.Sarkar,T.-S.Huang,D.Ses- sion, M. J. Mehrabad, R. Ni, M. Xie, P. Upadhyay, J. Van- nucci, S. Mittal, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Imamoglu, Y.Zhou, andM.Hafezi,NatureCommunications15,2305 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Z.Lian,Y.Meng,L.Ma,I.Maity,L.Yan,Q.Wu,X.Huang, D. Chen, X. Chen, X. Chen,et al., Nature Physics20, 34 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    X. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Zhu, H. Park, Y. Wang, C. Wang, W.G.Holtzmann,T.Taniguchi,K.Watanabe,J.Yan,etal., Nature Materials22, 599 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Ohgushi, S

    K. Ohgushi, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Physical Re- view B62, R6065 (2000)

    work page 2000

  26. [26]

    Green, L

    D. Green, L. Santos, and C. Chamon, Physical Review B–Condensed Matter and Materials Physics82, 075104 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    D. N. Sheng, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun, and L. Sheng, Nature Communications2, 389 EP (2011)

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236802 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    K. Sun, Z. Gu, H. Katsura, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236803 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. X1, 021014 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Liu and E

    Z. Liu and E. J. Bergholtz, inEncyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Second Edition), edited by T. Chakraborty (Academic Press, Oxford, 2024) second edition ed., pp. 515–538

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    S. A. Parameswaran, R. Roy, and S. L. Sondhi, Comptes Rendus Physique14, 816 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Y.-L. Wu, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Physical Re- view B85, 075116 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Z. Liu, R. N. Bhatt, and N. Regnault, Physical Review B 91, 045126 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    T.Liu,C.Repellin,B.A.Bernevig, andN.Regnault,Phys- ical Review B87, 205136 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    B. A. Bernevig and N. Regnault, Physical Review B85, 075128 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    D. L. Bergman, C. Wu, and L. Balents, Physical Review B–Condensed Matter and Materials Physics78, 125104 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    L. A. Jauregui, A. Y. Joe, K. Pistunova, D. S. Wild, A. A. High,Y.Zhou,G.Scuri,K.DeGreve,A.Sushko,C.-H.Yu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. J. Needleman, M. D. Lukin, H. Park, and P. Kim, Science366, 870 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    D. N. Shanks, F. Mahdikhanysarvejahany, C. Muccianti, A. Alfrey, M. R. Koehler, D. G. Mandrus, T. Taniguchi, K.Watanabe,H.Yu,B.J.LeRoy, andJ.R.Schaibley,Nano Letters21, 5641 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Karni, E

    O. Karni, E. Barré, S. C. Lau, R. Gillen, E. Y. Ma, B. Kim, K.Watanabe,T.Taniguchi,J.Maultzsch,K.Barmak,R.H. Page, andT.F.Heinz,PhysicalReviewLetters123,247402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Laturia, M

    A. Laturia, M. L. Van De Put, and W. G. Vandenberghe, npj 2D Materials and Applications2, 6 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Kutrowska-Girzycka, E

    J. Kutrowska-Girzycka, E. Zieba-Ostój, D. Biegańska, M. Florian, A. Steinhoff, E. Rogowicz, P. Mrowiński, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Gies, S. Tongay, C. Schnei- der, and M. Syperek, Applied Physics Reviews9, 041410 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Chakraborty, P

    T. Chakraborty, P. Pietiläinen, and F. C. Zhang, Physical Review Letters57, 130 (1986)

    work page 1986

  45. [45]

    F.D.M.HaldaneandE.H.Rezayi,PhysicalReviewLetters 54, 237 (1985)

    work page 1985

  46. [46]

    Béran and R

    P. Béran and R. Morf, Physical Review B43, 12654 (1991)

    work page 1991

  47. [47]

    Morf and B

    R. Morf and B. I. Halperin, Physical Review B33, 2221 (1986)

    work page 1986

  48. [48]

    T.LuandL.H.Santos,PhysicalReviewLetters133,186602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    T.Lu,Y.-M.Wu, andL.H.Santos,PhysicalReviewB112, 085138 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Xiao, Physical Review Letters132, 036501 (2024)

    C.Wang,X.-W.Zhang,X.Liu,Y.He,X.Xu,Y.Ran,T.Cao, and D. Xiao, Physical Review Letters132, 036501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    T. Wang, M. Wang, W. Kim, S. G. Louie, L. Fu, and M. P. Zaletel, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.12531 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Y. Jia, J. Yu, J. Liu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z. Qi, H. Pi, N.Regnault,H.Weng,B.A.Bernevig, andQ.Wu,Physical Review B109, 205121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    C. Xu, N. Mao, T. Zeng, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 066601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    C.Wang,X.-W.Zhang,X.Liu,J.Wang,T.Cao, andD.Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 076503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    F.Pichler,W.Kadow,C.Kuhlenkamp, andM.Knap,Phys- ical Review B111, 075108 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Z. Liu, B. Li, Y. Shi, and F. Wu, Physical Review B112, 245104 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Z. Yan, Q. Li, T. Soejima, and E. Khalaf, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15863 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    J.Wang,J.Cano,A.J.Millis,Z.Liu, andB.Yang,Physical review letters127, 246403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Physical Review B108, 205144 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Physical Review Research7, 023158 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. Törmä, and B.-J. Yang, npj Quantum Materials10, 101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    A. P. Reddy, N. Paul, A. Abouelkomsan, and L. Fu, Phys- ical review letters133, 166503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    C.-E. Ahn, W. Lee, K. Yananose, Y. Kim, and G. Y. Cho, 7 Phys. Rev. B110, L161109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Chen, W.-W

    F. Chen, W.-W. Luo, W. Zhu, and D. Sheng, Nature Com- munications16, 2115 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    H. Liu, Z. Liu, and E. J. Bergholtz, Physical review letters 135, 106604 (2025)

    work page 2025