Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Bridging Modality Disconnect in Self-Reflection via Closed-Loop Visually Grounded Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2602.18746 v3 pith:4NJT54U5 submitted 2026-02-21 cs.CV

Bridging Modality Disconnect in Self-Reflection via Closed-Loop Visually Grounded Verification

classification cs.CV
keywords visualreflectionverificationgroundedmirrorreasoningrevisionvision-language
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the era of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), enhancing multimodal reasoning capabilities remains a critical challenge, particularly in handling ambiguous or complex visual inputs, where initial inferences often lead to hallucinations or logic errors. Existing VLMs often produce plausible yet ungrounded answers, and even when prompted to "reflect", their corrections may remain detached from the image evidence. To address this, we propose the MIRROR framework for Multimodal Iterative Reasoning via Reflection On visual Regions. By embedding visual reflection as a core mechanism, MIRROR is formulated as a closed-loop process comprising draft, critique, region-based verification, and revision, which are repeated until the output is visually grounded. To facilitate training of this model, we construct **ReflectV**, a visual reflective dataset for multi-turn supervision that explicitly contains reflection triggers, region-based verification actions, and answer revision grounded in visual evidence. Experiments on both general vision-language benchmarks and representative vision-language reasoning benchmarks show that MIRROR improves correctness and reduces visual hallucinations, demonstrating the value of training reflection as an evidence-seeking, region-aware verification process rather than a purely textual revision step.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BUS: Brain-Inspired Unsupervised Self-Reflection via Backward Prediction for Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    BUS enables unsupervised self-reflection in VLMs by training models to perform backward prediction—identifying which reasoning paths precede a sampled answer—yielding improvements on 8 visual reasoning benchmarks with...

  2. BUS: Brain-Inspired Unsupervised Self-Reflection via Backward Prediction for Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    BUS trains VLMs for self-reflection without labels by verifying which sampled reasonings precede their own answers via backward prediction, improving multimodal reasoning.

  3. ESC: Emotional Self-Correction for Reliable Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ESC uses emotional cues triggered by an external verifier to enable training-free self-correction in VLMs, improving reliability on safety, hallucination, and reasoning benchmarks.