Recognition: unknown
Training Flow Matching: The Role of Weighting and Parameterization
read the original abstract
We study the training objectives of denoising-based generative models, with a particular focus on loss weighting and output parameterization, including noise-, clean image-, and velocity-based formulations. Through a systematic numerical study, we analyze how these training choices interact with the intrinsic dimensionality of the data manifold, model architecture, and dataset size. Our experiments span synthetic datasets with controlled geometry as well as image data, and compare training objectives using quantitative metrics for denoising accuracy (PSNR across noise levels) and generative quality (FID). Rather than proposing a new method, our goal is to disentangle the various factors that matter when training a flow matching model, in order to provide practical insights on design choices.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FluxFlow: Conservative Flow-Matching for Astronomical Image Super-Resolution
FluxFlow is a conservative pixel-space flow-matching framework for astronomical super-resolution that incorporates real atmospheric uncertainty and a training-free Wiener correction, outperforming baselines on a new 1...
-
FluxFlow: Conservative Flow-Matching for Astronomical Image Super-Resolution
FluxFlow uses conservative pixel-space flow-matching with uncertainty weights and Wiener test-time correction to outperform baselines on photometric and scientific accuracy for ground-to-space super-resolution, valida...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.