Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 1 cited by

Large homogeneous data admit forward self-similar solutions for 2D hypodissipative Navier-Stokes, and they become smooth with sharp decay once the fractional power exceeds 2/3.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 22:17 UTC pith:V3AFF4TY

load-bearing objection Solid 2D fractional self-similar existence with sharp decay for every weak solution when α>2/3; numerics are honest evidence on a surrogate.

arxiv 2603.12497 v2 pith:V3AFF4TY submitted 2026-03-12 math.AP math-phmath.FAmath.MP

Forward Self-Similar Solutions to the 2D Hypodissipative Navier-Stokes Equations

Thomas Y. Hou , Peicong Song This is my paper
classification math.AP math-phmath.FAmath.MP MSC 35Q3076D0535B6535C06
keywords hypodissipative Navier-Stokesforward self-similar solutionsfractional LaplacianLeray-Schauderfar-field decaynonuniquenesstime-dependent viscosity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs forward self-similar solutions of the two-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with fractional diffusion of order alpha between 1/2 and 1. For any divergence-free initial velocity that is homogeneous of degree 1-2alpha and merely locally Lipschitz, there exists at least one weak self-similar solution whose profile differs from the corresponding fractional-heat profile by a function in the energy space H^alpha. When alpha is larger than 2/3 the same weak solutions are in fact smooth and obey sharp pointwise decay estimates at infinity that match the size of the quadratic source term. The authors also give numerical evidence that a closely related 2D Navier-Stokes system with time-dependent viscosity develops both unstable eigenmodes and symmetry-breaking bifurcations of self-similar profiles for large data, suggesting that uniqueness can fail. The result supplies the first systematic existence and regularity theory for large self-similar solutions in the two-dimensional hypodissipative regime and prepares the ground for a computer-assisted non-uniqueness argument.

Core claim

For every alpha in (1/2,1) and every divergence-free (1-2alpha)-homogeneous initial datum that is locally Lipschitz, the self-similar profile equation admits a weak solution U = U0 + V with V in H^alpha; when alpha exceeds 2/3 every such weak solution is smooth and satisfies the sharp far-field bounds |nabla^k (U - U0)(x)| less than or equal to C (1+|x|)^{1-4alpha} (or with a logarithm when the data are only Lipschitz).

What carries the argument

Decomposition U = U0 + V together with a Bogovskii correction that truncates the background velocity so its gradient becomes arbitrarily small, allowing a coercive H^alpha energy estimate that feeds the Leray-Schauder fixed-point construction; regularity and decay are then recovered by mollification, weighted energy estimates, and a Duhamel representation that treats the nonlinear terms as a source.

Load-bearing premise

The uniform energy bound that makes the fixed-point argument work rests on being able to cut off the fractional-heat profile far away and restore divergence-free structure while keeping the gradient of the corrected field arbitrarily small; that step uses the known pointwise decay of the heat profile.

What would settle it

Either exhibit a large locally Lipschitz homogeneous datum for which no H^alpha weak self-similar profile exists, or produce a weak H^alpha solution for some alpha greater than 2/3 that fails to be smooth or that decays slower than the claimed rate (1+|x|)^{1-4alpha}.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs forward self-similar solutions of the 2D hypodissipative Navier–Stokes system with fractional diffusion (−Δ)^α for α∈(1/2,1). For arbitrarily large divergence-free (1−2α)-homogeneous initial data that are locally Lipschitz, Theorem 1.1 / Theorem 3.1 produces at least one weak solution whose profile U satisfies U−U0∈H^α(R²), where U0 is the fractional-heat profile. For α∈(2/3,1) every such H^α weak solution is shown to be smooth (Proposition 4.1) and to obey the sharp pointwise decay estimates |∇^k(U−U0)(x)|≲(1+|x|)^{1−4α} (with a logarithmic loss for merely Lipschitz data). The argument proceeds by Leray–Schauder on approximating balls with vanishing viscosity, a Bogovskiĭ correction that makes the background gradient small, a-posteriori bootstrap via mollification and difference quotients, weighted energy estimates that preserve H^α-coercivity, and a Duhamel representation with an Oseen kernel. A final numerical section studies a related 2D Navier–Stokes equation with time-dependent viscosity and reports eigenvalue crossings and symmetry-breaking bifurcations for large k-fold-symmetric data.

Significance. The work supplies a complete existence–regularity–decay theory for large-data forward self-similar solutions of the 2D fractional Navier–Stokes equations down to the natural threshold α=1/2, with a clean smoothness threshold α=2/3 coming from the Sobolev product H^α×H^α↪H^{2α−1}. The pointwise far-field estimates are sharp (matching the source U0·∇U0) and hold for every H^α weak solution, not merely the constructed ones; this information is useful for future non-uniqueness arguments. The technical ingredients—Bogovskiĭ truncation of the background, carefully designed weights that retain coercivity, quantitative mollification commutators, and the multiplier trick that removes the logarithmic loss—are standard but carefully adapted to the fractional setting and yield a self-contained, non-circular proof. The numerical evidence for a surrogate equation is presented as exploratory and does not claim to prove non-uniqueness of the original system.

minor comments (4)
  1. In the statement of Theorem 1.1 the decay exponents for U itself and for U−U0 are written with the same constant C; it would help the reader if the dependence of C on the C^{m,β}-norm of the angular data were made explicit (as is done later in Lemma 2.1).
  2. Section 6 and Appendix B are independent of the analytic theorems; a short sentence at the beginning of §6 reminding the reader that the numerics concern only the surrogate equation (NSt,α) would prevent any possible misreading.
  3. A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “ˇSverák” vs “Sverak”, occasional missing spaces around operators). A light copy-edit pass would clean them up.
  4. Lemma 2.1 and the subsequent decay statements for the Oseen kernel (Lemma A.6) are used repeatedly; cross-references to the precise decay rates when they are invoked in §5 would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: existence, regularity upgrade, and decay estimates are derived from the equation via standard energy methods, Leray–Schauder, and Duhamel without fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citations that close a loop.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. U0 is the explicit fractional-heat profile (convolution against the heat kernel); its pointwise decay (Lemma 2.1) is obtained by Taylor expansion of the homogeneous data against the known kernel decay and is independent of the nonlinear problem. Existence of V ∈ H^α (Theorem 3.1) proceeds by adding artificial viscosity, localizing to balls, and applying Leray–Schauder to the compact continuous map T; the only non-routine step is a Bogovskiĭ correction that truncates U0 at large radius so that ∥∇U1∥_∞ can be made arbitrarily small and the transport term absorbed into the coercive H^α energy. That truncation is justified solely by the already-established decay of U0, not by any property of V. A-posteriori regularity for α > 2/3 (Proposition 4.1) uses quantitative mollification commutators and the Sobolev multiplication H^α × H^α ↪ H^{2α−1}; weighted estimates and the subsequent Duhamel bootstrap with the Oseen kernel recover the sharp source rate of U0·∇U0. No quantity is defined in terms of a later “prediction,” no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ prior work to force the present construction, and the numerical section on the surrogate time-dependent-viscosity equation is explicitly labeled as independent evidence. Self-citations appear only as background comparisons and do not close any logical loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is pure analysis plus supporting numerics. The only free parameters appear in the numerical experiments (amplitude σ, mesh size, domain radius). Analytic axioms are standard Sobolev embeddings, the fractional heat kernel decay, and the Bogovskiĭ operator on annular regions; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • boundary amplitude σ
    Hand-chosen large values (σ≈120–140 for k=3, α=5/8) at which eigenvalue crossings and bifurcations are observed; the precise critical σ is not claimed to be universal.
  • computational radius R and mesh size h
    R=150, h=0.06 chosen for the main run; results are reported only for these values.
axioms (4)
  • standard math Sobolev multiplication H^α×H^α↪H^{2α−1} for α∈(1/2,1) and the resulting gain 4α−2>α precisely when α>2/3
    Used throughout §4 to close the regularity bootstrap; classical.
  • standard math Pointwise decay of the fractional heat kernel and of its derivatives (Lemma 2.1)
    Taken as known and proved via Fourier representation and Taylor expansion with remainder.
  • standard math Existence and L^∞ bounds for the Bogovskiĭ operator on annular domains
    Cited from Galdi; used to restore divergence-free condition after large-scale cut-off of U0.
  • domain assumption The surrogate equation with time-dependent viscosity shares the same scaling and therefore the same self-similar profiles as the original fractional system
    Stated in §6; used to justify that numerical non-uniqueness for the surrogate is relevant to the original problem.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 60346 in / 2793 out tokens · 31026 ms · 2026-07-14T22:17:11.922937+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the forward self-similar solutions to the $2$D hypodissipative Navier-Stokes equation with fractional diffusion $(-\Delta)^\alpha$ for $\frac{1}{2}<\alpha<1$. We first show that for arbitrarily large $(1-2\alpha)$-homogeneous initial data which are locally Lipschitz, there exists at least one weak solution whose profile differs from the self-similar profile of the fractional heat equation by an element of $H^\alpha(\reall^2)$. Moreover, when $\alpha\in(\frac{2}{3},1)$ we show that any such weak solution is actually smooth, hence a strong solution, and satisfies certain far field decay estimates. Finally, we provide numerical evidence for the nonuniqueness of the related $2$D Navier-Stokes equation with time-dependent viscosity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Self-Similar Solutions of the Two-Dimensional Incompressible Euler Equation from Large Initial Data

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    For every C^1 divergence-free (−a)-homogeneous velocity on R^2, a self-similar 2D Euler weak solution with that initial profile exists for each a in (1/3,1).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Global weak besov solutions of the navier–stokes equations and applications.������� ��� �������� ��������� ��� ��������, 232(1):197–263, Apr 2019

    Dallas Albritton and Tobias Barker. Global weak besov solutions of the navier–stokes equations and applications.������� ��� �������� ��������� ��� ��������, 232(1):197–263, Apr 2019

    2019

  2. [2]

    Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations.���� �� ����� ���, 196(1):415–455, 2022

    Dallas Albritton, Elia Bru´ e, and Maria Colombo. Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations.���� �� ����� ���, 196(1):415–455, 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Princeton University Press, 2024

    Dallas Albritton, Elia Bru´ e, Maria Colombo, Camillo De Lellis, Vikram Giri, Maximilian Janisch, and Hyunju Kwon.����������� ��� �������������� ��� ��� �� ����� ���������� ����� �� ������� ���������, volume 215. Princeton University Press, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions to the hypodissipative Navier- Stokes equations in two dimensions.����� ����� �����, 402(1):429–446, 2023

    Dallas Albritton and Maria Colombo. Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions to the hypodissipative Navier- Stokes equations in two dimensions.����� ����� �����, 402(1):429–446, 2023

    2023

  5. [5]

    Vanishing viscosity non-unique solutions to the forced 2d euler equations, 2025

    Dallas Albritton, Maria Colombo, and Giulia Mescolini. Vanishing viscosity non-unique solutions to the forced 2d euler equations, 2025. 50

    2025

  6. [6]

    Forward self-similar solutions to the 2d navier–stokes equations, 2026

    Dallas Albritton, Julien Guillod, Mikhail Korobkov, and Xiao Ren. Forward self-similar solutions to the 2d navier–stokes equations, 2026

    2026

  7. [7]

    Baratta, Joseph P

    Igor A. Baratta, Joseph P. Dean, Jørgen S. Dokken, Michal Habera, Jack S. Hale, Chris N. Richardson, Marie E. Rognes, Matthew W. Scroggs, Nathan Sime, and Garth N. Wells. DOLFINx: The next generation FEniCS problem solving environment, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Oscar A. Barraza. Self-similar solutions in weakL p-spaces of the Navier-Stokes equations.������� ������ ����� ��������������, 12(2):411–439, 1996

    1996

  9. [9]

    Spatial decay of discretely self-similar solutions to the Navier– Stokes equations.���� ��� ������� ��������, 5(2):377–407, 2023

    Zachary Bradshaw and Patrick Phelps. Spatial decay of discretely self-similar solutions to the Navier– Stokes equations.���� ��� ������� ��������, 5(2):377–407, 2023

    2023

  10. [10]

    Forward discretely self-similar solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations II.���� ����� �������� �, 18(3):1095–1119, 2017

    Zachary Bradshaw and Tai-Peng Tsai. Forward discretely self-similar solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations II.���� ����� �������� �, 18(3):1095–1119, 2017

    2017

  11. [11]

    Rotationally corrected scaling invariant solutions to the Navier- Stokes equations.����� ������� ����������� ���������, 42(7):1065–1087, 2017

    Zachary Bradshaw and Tai-Peng Tsai. Rotationally corrected scaling invariant solutions to the Navier- Stokes equations.����� ������� ����������� ���������, 42(7):1065–1087, 2017

    2017

  12. [12]

    Discretely self-similar solutions to the navier–stokes equations with besov space data.������� ��� �������� ��������� ��� ��������, 229(1):53–77, Jul 2018

    Zachary Bradshaw and Tai-Peng Tsai. Discretely self-similar solutions to the navier–stokes equations with besov space data.������� ��� �������� ��������� ��� ��������, 229(1):53–77, Jul 2018

    2018

  13. [13]

    Discretely self-similar solutions to the navier–stokes equations with data inl 2 loc satisfying the local energy inequality.�������� � ���, 12(8):1943–1962, 2019

    Zachary Bradshaw and Tai-Peng Tsai. Discretely self-similar solutions to the navier–stokes equations with data inl 2 loc satisfying the local energy inequality.�������� � ���, 12(8):1943–1962, 2019

    1943

  14. [14]

    Cannone, Y

    M. Cannone, Y. Meyer, and F. Planchon. Solutions auto-similaires des ´ equations de navier-stokes. �� ������������������ ��� �� ����� ��� ���������� ���������������, pages 1–10, 1993-1994

    1993

  15. [15]

    Cannone and F Planchon

    M. Cannone and F Planchon. Self-similar solutions for navier-stokes equations in.�������������� �� ������� ����������� ���������, 21(1-2):179–193, 1996

    1996

  16. [16]

    Dongho Chae and J¨ org Wolf. Existence of discretely self-similar solutions to the navier–stokes equations for initial value in lloc2(r3).������� �� ���������� ����� �������� � �� ������� ��� ���� �����, 35(4):1019– 1039, 2018

    2018

  17. [17]

    Jiajie Chen and Thomas Y. Hou. Stable nearly self-similar blowup of the 2d boussinesq and 3d euler equations with smooth data i: Analysis, 2023

    2023

  18. [18]

    Jiajie Chen and Thomas Y. Hou. Stable nearly self-similar blowup of the 2d boussinesq and 3d euler equations with smooth data ii: Rigorous numerics.���������� �������� � ����������, 23(1):25–130, 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Asymmetric self-similar spiral solutions of 2-d incomressible euler equations, 2025

    Hyungjun Choi. Asymmetric self-similar spiral solutions of 2-d incomressible euler equations, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Ill-posedness of leray solutions for the hy- podissipative navier–stokes equations.�������������� �� ������������ �������, 362(2):659–688, Sep 2018

    Maria Colombo, Camillo De Lellis, and Luigi De Rosa. Ill-posedness of leray solutions for the hy- podissipative navier–stokes equations.�������������� �� ������������ �������, 362(2):659–688, Sep 2018

    2018

  21. [21]

    Optimal local smoothing and analyticity rate estimates for the generalized navier-stokes equations.�������������� �� ������������ ��������, 7:67–80, 2009

    Hongjie Dong and Dong Li. Optimal local smoothing and analyticity rate estimates for the generalized navier-stokes equations.�������������� �� ������������ ��������, 7:67–80, 2009

    2009

  22. [22]

    Tarek M. Elgindi. Finite-time singularity formation forC 1,α solutions to the incompressible Euler equations onR 3.������ �� �����������, 194(3):647 – 727, 2021

    2021

  23. [23]

    Elgindi, Tej-Eddine Ghoul, and Nader Masmoudi

    Tarek M. Elgindi, Tej-Eddine Ghoul, and Nader Masmoudi. On the stability of self-similar blow-up for c1,α solutions to the incompressible euler equations onR 3.��������� ������� �� �����������, 2019

    2019

  24. [24]

    Algebraic spiral solutions of 2d incompressible euler.������� �� ����������� ���������, 255(11):3749–3787, 2013

    Volker Elling. Algebraic spiral solutions of 2d incompressible euler.������� �� ����������� ���������, 255(11):3749–3787, 2013. 51

    2013

  25. [25]

    Algebraic spiral solutions of the 2d incompressible euler equations.�������� �� ��� ��������� ������������ �������� ��� ������, 47(1):323–334, Mar 2016

    Volker Elling. Algebraic spiral solutions of the 2d incompressible euler equations.�������� �� ��� ��������� ������������ �������� ��� ������, 47(1):323–334, Mar 2016

    2016

  26. [26]

    Self-similar 2d euler solutions with mixed-sign vorticity.�������������� �� ������������ �������, 348(1):27–68, Nov 2016

    Volker Elling. Self-similar 2d euler solutions with mixed-sign vorticity.�������������� �� ������������ �������, 348(1):27–68, Nov 2016

    2016

  27. [27]

    Springer Monographs in Mathematics

    Giovanni Paolo Galdi.�� ������������ �� ��� ������������ ������ �� ��� ������������� ���������� ������������ ��������. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer New York, NY, 2 edition, 2011. XIV, 1018 pages

    2011

  28. [28]

    Navier-stokes flow in r3 with measures as initial vorticity and morrey spaces.�������������� �� ������� ����������� ���������, 14(5):577–618, 1989

    Yoshikazu Giga and Tetsuro Miyakawa. Navier-stokes flow in r3 with measures as initial vorticity and morrey spaces.�������������� �� ������� ����������� ���������, 14(5):577–618, 1989

    1989

  29. [29]

    The kato-ponce inequality.�������������� �� ������� ����������� ���������, 39(6):1128–1157, 2014

    Loukas Grafakos and Seungly Oh. The kato-ponce inequality.�������������� �� ������� ����������� ���������, 39(6):1128–1157, 2014

    2014

  30. [30]

    On the forward self-similar solutions to the two-dimensional navier-stokes equations, 2026

    Changfeng Gui, Hao Liu, and Chunjing Xie. On the forward self-similar solutions to the two-dimensional navier-stokes equations, 2026

    2026

  31. [31]

    Numerical investigations of non-uniqueness for the navier–stokes initial value problem in borderline spaces.������� �� ������������ ����� ���������, 25(3):46, May 2023

    Julien Guillod and Vladim´ ırˇSver´ ak. Numerical investigations of non-uniqueness for the navier–stokes initial value problem in borderline spaces.������� �� ������������ ����� ���������, 25(3):46, May 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    Roman, and Vicente Vidal

    Vicente Hernandez, Jose E. Roman, and Vicente Vidal. SLEPc: A scalable and flexible toolkit for the solution of eigenvalue problems.��� ������������ �� ������������ ��������, 31(3):351–362, 2005

    2005

  33. [33]

    Nonuniqueness of leray-hopf solutions to the unforced incompressible 3d navier-stokes equation, 2025

    Thomas Hou, Yixuan Wang, and Changhe Yang. Nonuniqueness of leray-hopf solutions to the unforced incompressible 3d navier-stokes equation, 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Thomas Y. Hou. Potentially singular behavior of the 3D Navier-Stokes equations.������ ������� �����, 23(6):2251–2299, 2023

    2023

  35. [35]

    Hyt¨ onen

    Tuomas P. Hyt¨ onen. The sharp weighted bound for general Calder´ on–Zygmund operators.������ �� �����������, 175(3):1473–1506, 2012

    2012

  36. [36]

    Are the incompressible 3d navier–stokes equations locally ill-posed in the natural energy space?������� �� ���������� ��������, 268(12):3734–3766, 2015

    Hao Jia and Vladimir Sverak. Are the incompressible 3d navier–stokes equations locally ill-posed in the natural energy space?������� �� ���������� ��������, 268(12):3734–3766, 2015

    2015

  37. [37]

    Local-in-space estimates near initial time for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and forward self-similar solutions.������� �����, 196(1):233–265, 2014

    Hao Jia and Vladim´ ır ˇSzver´ ak. Local-in-space estimates near initial time for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and forward self-similar solutions.������� �����, 196(1):233–265, 2014

    2014

  38. [38]

    Well-posedness for the navier–stokes equations.�������� �� ������ ������, 157(1):22–35, 2001

    Herbert Koch and Daniel Tataru. Well-posedness for the navier–stokes equations.�������� �� ������ ������, 157(1):22–35, 2001

    2001

  39. [39]

    Forward self-similar solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations in the half space.����� ���, 9(8):1811–1827, 2016

    Mikhail Korobkov and Tai-Peng Tsai. Forward self-similar solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations in the half space.����� ���, 9(8):1811–1827, 2016

    2016

  40. [40]

    The forward self-similar solution of fractional incompressible navier-stokes system: The critical case.������� �� ���������� ��������, 287(7):110542, 2024

    Baishun Lai. The forward self-similar solution of fractional incompressible navier-stokes system: The critical case.������� �� ���������� ��������, 287(7):110542, 2024

    2024

  41. [41]

    Forward self-similar solutions of the fractional navier-stokes equations.�������� �� �����������, 352:981–1043, 2019

    Baishun Lai, Changxing Miao, and Xiaoxin Zheng. Forward self-similar solutions of the fractional navier-stokes equations.�������� �� �����������, 352:981–1043, 2019

    2019

  42. [42]

    Global regularity of weak solutions to the generalized Leray equations and its applications.������ ����� ����� ����, 374(10):7449–7497, 2021

    Baishun Lai, Changxing Miao, and Xiaoxin Zheng. Global regularity of weak solutions to the generalized Leray equations and its applications.������ ����� ����� ����, 374(10):7449–7497, 2021

    2021

  43. [43]

    Neˇ cas, M

    J. Neˇ cas, M. R˚ uˇ ziˇ cka, and V.ˇSver´ ak. On leray’s self-similar solutions of the navier-stokes equations. ���� �����������, 176(2):283–294, Sep 1996. 52

    1996

  44. [44]

    Infinitely many leray–hopf solutions for the fractional navier–stokes equations.���� ����������� �� ������� ����������� ���������, 44(4):335–365, 2019

    Luigi De Rosa. Infinitely many leray–hopf solutions for the fractional navier–stokes equations.���� ����������� �� ������� ����������� ���������, 44(4):335–365, 2019

    2019

  45. [45]

    Self-similar algebraic spiral solution of 2-d incompressible euler equations.������ �� ���, 11(1):13, May 2025

    Feng Shao, Dongyi Wei, and Zhifei Zhang. Self-similar algebraic spiral solution of 2-d incompressible euler equations.������ �� ���, 11(1):13, May 2025

    2025

  46. [46]

    STEIN and Timothy S

    ELIAS M. STEIN and Timothy S. Murphy.�������� �������� ��������� ������������� �������� �������������� ��� ����������� ���������� ��������. Princeton University Press, 1993

    1993

  47. [47]

    Forward discretely self-similar solutions of the navier–stokes equations.�������������� �� ������������ �������, 328(1):29–44, May 2014

    Tai-Peng Tsai. Forward discretely self-similar solutions of the navier–stokes equations.�������������� �� ������������ �������, 328(1):29–44, May 2014

    2014

  48. [48]

    On leray’s self-similar solutions of the navier-stokes equations satisfying local energy estimates.������� ��� �������� ��������� ��� ��������, 143(1):29–51, Aug 1998

    Tai-Peng Tsai. On leray’s self-similar solutions of the navier-stokes equations satisfying local energy estimates.������� ��� �������� ��������� ��� ��������, 143(1):29–51, Aug 1998

    1998

  49. [49]

    Instability and non-uniqueness in the cauchy problem for the euler equations of an ideal incompressible fluid

    Misha Vishik. Instability and non-uniqueness in the cauchy problem for the euler equations of an ideal incompressible fluid. part i, 2018

    2018

  50. [50]

    Instability and non-uniqueness in the cauchy problem for the euler equations of an ideal incompressible fluid

    Misha Vishik. Instability and non-uniqueness in the cauchy problem for the euler equations of an ideal incompressible fluid. part ii, 2018

    2018

  51. [51]

    Jiahong Wu. Lower bounds for an integral involving fractional laplacians and the generalized navier- stokes equations in besov spaces.�������������� �� ������������ �������, 263(3):803–831, May 2006. 53

    2006