Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

A multi-agent system that searches over clinical hypotheses with dual memory outperforms linear LLM diagnosis pipelines on accuracy and explainability.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-07-13 17:43 UTC pith:QCLVNBTS

load-bearing objection We only have the ClinicalAgents abstract; the cached full text is a different paper (DUGAE on point-cloud compression), so the SOTA accuracy/explainability claims cannot be checked. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.26182 v2 pith:QCLVNBTS submitted 2026-03-27 cs.CL

ClinicalAgents: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Clinical Decision Making with Dual-Memory

Zhuohan Ge , Haoyang Li , Yubo Wang , Nicole Hu , Chen Jason Zhang , Qing Li This is my paper
classification cs.CL
keywords clinical decision makingmulti-agent systemsMonte Carlo Tree Searchdual memorylarge language modelsdiagnostic reasoningworking memoryexperience retrieval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Large language models used for diagnosis usually map symptoms to labels in one pass, which misses how clinicians actually work: they form hypotheses, check evidence, and backtrack when something is missing. ClinicalAgents treats diagnosis as a dynamic multi-agent search process, with an orchestrator that explores and revises paths the way a clinician would. The system keeps a working memory of the evolving patient state and a separate experience memory of guidelines and past cases that can be pulled in with feedback. On the paper’s benchmarks this design beats strong single-agent and multi-agent baselines in both diagnostic accuracy and how clearly the reasoning can be inspected. The claim is that making the search non-linear and memory-aware is what closes the gap with expert clinical workflow.

Core claim

ClinicalAgents shows that modeling clinical decision-making as Monte Carlo Tree Search over multi-agent actions, backed by a dual-memory store of mutable patient state and static clinical experience, yields higher diagnostic accuracy and better explainability than static linear symptom-to-diagnosis mappings or other multi-agent chains evaluated in the paper.

What carries the argument

Dual-Memory MCTS orchestration: an orchestrator runs iterative hypothesis generation, evidence verification, and backtracking as a Monte Carlo Tree Search, while a mutable working memory tracks the current patient state and a static experience memory retrieves guidelines and historical cases through an active feedback loop.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that MCTS-style agent search plus dual memory is a faithful enough stand-in for expert clinical thinking that gains on its evaluation sets reflect real diagnostic improvement, not just better scaffolding for the benchmark.

What would settle it

Run the same cases with and without the MCTS orchestrator and dual-memory loop against clinician-adjudicated ground truth; if accuracy and explanation quality do not improve over strong linear and multi-agent baselines when those components are ablated, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Diagnostic LLM systems should prefer iterative hypothesis-and-verify search over single-shot symptom-to-label maps.
  • Separating mutable patient state from static guideline/case memory becomes a reusable design pattern for clinical agents.
  • Backtracking when evidence is missing can be made an explicit, measurable step in automated diagnosis pipelines.
  • Explainability gains can be attributed to the search trace itself rather than post-hoc rationalization of a final label.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dual-memory search pattern could transfer to other high-stakes domains where missing evidence must trigger revision, such as legal case analysis or industrial fault diagnosis.
  • If the experience memory is kept updatable with new guidelines, the framework could track evolving clinical standards without retraining the base model.
  • Latency and cost of MCTS rollouts may limit bedside use unless the search depth is tightly budgeted; that tradeoff is a natural next measurement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript (as titled ClinicalAgents) claims a multi-agent clinical decision framework that models clinician-like iterative reasoning via Monte Carlo Tree Search orchestration, with a dual-memory design (mutable working patient state plus static experience memory of guidelines/cases with active feedback). It asserts superior diagnostic accuracy and explainability over single-agent and multi-agent baselines, with code release. The supplied full-text body, however, is an unrelated paper (DUGAE) on unified geometry and attribute enhancement for G-PCC compressed dynamic point clouds using sparse convolution, geometry/attribute motion compensation, and DA-KNN recoloring, reporting large BD-rate gains on 8iVFB/Owlii/MVUB sequences.

Significance. If the ClinicalAgents claims held with proper evaluation, an MCTS-orchestrated multi-agent system with dual memory would be a useful contribution to LLM-based clinical decision support, especially if code and ablations made the gains attributable to the architecture rather than scaffolding. The actual supplied manuscript (DUGAE) is a solid systems contribution in point-cloud compression post-processing: it unifies geometry and attribute enhancement with explicit inter-frame motion compensation and reports strong BD-PSNR/BD-rate improvements and perceptual gains over GeS-TM and competitive results vs V-PCC, with planned code release. That work is significant for dynamic PCC quality enhancement, but it is not the paper named in the review request.

major comments (2)
  1. Identity mismatch: the review target is ClinicalAgents (arXiv 2603.26182, cs.CL multi-agent clinical diagnosis with MCTS and dual memory). The full manuscript text provided is DUGAE (arXiv 2603.26183, dynamic point-cloud geometry/attribute enhancement). No methods, datasets, baselines, metrics, or ablations for ClinicalAgents appear. The abstract claims of best diagnostic accuracy/explainability cannot be verified or stress-tested against the body.
  2. Because the ClinicalAgents body is absent, load-bearing claims (MCTS orchestration as a faithful proxy for clinician cognition; dual-memory sufficiency; gains over strong single- and multi-agent baselines) cannot be assessed for confounding, scaffolding effects, or evaluation design. A referee report on the stated paper is not possible from the supplied materials.
minor comments (2)
  1. Even for the DUGAE text that was supplied: Table IV and the time-complexity discussion note non-bitwise-repeatable GPU outputs; this should be quantified if reproducibility is claimed.
  2. DUGAE body: minor typos (e.g., 'fuinction' near the R-D discussion) and incomplete visual/supplemental cross-references should be cleaned if that paper is under review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical multi-agent systems paper; abstract claims are experimental comparisons, not definitional or fitted predictions.

full rationale

ClinicalAgents is an empirical systems paper. Its central claims are that an MCTS-style multi-agent orchestrator plus dual-memory architecture improves diagnostic accuracy and explainability relative to single-agent and multi-agent baselines. These are experimental outcomes measured against external baselines, not quantities derived from equations that reduce to their own inputs. There is no self-definitional loop (X defined via Y then used to predict Y), no fitted parameter re-labeled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz smuggled in via self-citation. The abstract's framing that the system 'simulates the cognitive workflow of expert clinicians' is a design motivation, not a mathematical derivation. Standard self-evaluation risk (authors design both system and eval) is not structural circularity under the stated criteria. Note: the supplied CACHEABLE full-text prefix is a different paper (DUGAE, arXiv:2603.26183); analysis is therefore confined to the ClinicalAgents abstract and title, which contain no circular derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 2 invented entities

Abstract-only review. Load-bearing premises are architectural and empirical assumptions rather than free parameters of a fitted physical model. No numeric free parameters are stated. Invented entities are software modules, not physical postulates.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Expert clinical diagnosis is well modeled as iterative hypothesis generation, evidence verification, and backtracking (MCTS-like search) rather than a static symptom-to-diagnosis map.
    Stated in the abstract as the gap the system bridges; if false, MCTS orchestration is misaligned with the task.
  • ad hoc to paper A dual-memory split (mutable working patient state + static experience memory of guidelines/cases with active feedback) is sufficient for context-aware clinical reasoning in the target setting.
    Core design choice of ClinicalAgents; not independently proven in the abstract.
  • domain assumption LLM-based multi-agent systems plus retrieval can stand in for clinician cognitive workflow on the evaluation tasks used.
    Implicit in all claims of simulating expert clinicians and improving diagnostic accuracy.
invented entities (2)
  • ClinicalAgents orchestrator (MCTS-modeled multi-agent controller) no independent evidence
    purpose: Dynamically generate hypotheses, verify evidence, and backtrack when information is missing.
    Central software construct introduced by the paper; no independent evidence outside the claimed experiments.
  • Dual-Memory architecture (working memory + experience memory with active feedback loop) no independent evidence
    purpose: Maintain evolving patient state and retrieve guidelines/historical cases for context-aware reasoning.
    Named architectural contribution; independent evidence would require external clinical validation not present in the abstract.

reviewed 2026-07-13 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ClinicalAgents: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Clinical Decision Making with Dual-Memory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QCLVNBTS

@misc{pith2026260326182,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ClinicalAgents: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Clinical Decision Making with Dual-Memory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QCLVNBTS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.26182}
}
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in healthcare, they often struggle with the complex, non-linear reasoning required for accurate clinical diagnosis. Existing methods typically rely on static, linear mappings from symptoms to diagnoses, failing to capture the iterative, hypothesis-driven reasoning inherent in human clinicians. To bridge this gap, we introduce ClinicalAgents, a novel multi-agent framework designed to simulate the cognitive workflow of expert clinicians. Unlike rigid sequential chains, ClinicalAgents employs a dynamic orchestration mechanism modeled as a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) process. This allows an orchestrator to iteratively generate hypotheses, actively verify evidence, and trigger backtracking when critical information is missing. The foundation of this framework is a Dual-Memory architecture: a mutable working memory that maintains the evolving patient state for context-aware reasoning, and a static experience memory that retrieves clinical guidelines and historical cases via an active feedback loop. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ClinicalAgents achieves the best performance among evaluated baselines, significantly enhancing both diagnostic accuracy and explainability compared to strong single-agent and multi-agent baselines. Our code is released at https://github.com/ZhuohanGe/ClinicalAgents-Code.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Path to Self-Evolving Clinical Systems: Scaling Medical Agents from Assistance to Autonomy

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.5

    Medical agents should be scaled mainly by richer clinical environments and self-evolution loops, not parameter growth alone, under a three-level autonomy taxonomy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    By exploiting large-scale data and deep networks, these methods can achieve better rate– distortion (R–D) performance than traditional codecs

    have rapidly emerged. By exploiting large-scale data and deep networks, these methods can achieve better rate– distortion (R–D) performance than traditional codecs. How- ever, they typically require GPU-accelerated inference and suf- fer from reproducibility issues across heterogeneous hardware and software platforms [14], [15]. In contrast, G-PCC and V- ...

    arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    A Versatile Point Cloud Compressor Using Universal Multiscale Conditional Coding–Part II: Attribute,

    J. Wang, R. Xue, J. Li, D. Ding, Y . Lin, and Z. Ma, “A Versatile Point Cloud Compressor Using Universal Multiscale Conditional Coding–Part II: Attribute,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 252–268, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    SPAC: Sampling-based Progressive Attribute Compression for Dense Point Clouds,

    X. Mao, H. Yuan, T. Guo, S. Jiang, R. Hamzaoui, and S. Kwong, “SPAC: Sampling-based Progressive Attribute Compression for Dense Point Clouds,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.10293, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    TSC-PCAC: V oxel Transformer and Sparse Convolution-Based Point Cloud Attribute Compression for 3D Broadcasting,

    Z. Guo, Y . Zhang, L. Zhu, H. Wang, and G. Jiang, “TSC-PCAC: V oxel Transformer and Sparse Convolution-Based Point Cloud Attribute Compression for 3D Broadcasting,”IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 154–166, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TBC.2024.3464417

    work page doi:10.1109/tbc.2024.3464417 2025

  5. [5]

    YOGA: Yet another geometry- based point cloud compressor,

    J. Zhang, T. Chen, D. Ding, and Z. Ma, “YOGA: Yet another geometry- based point cloud compressor,” inProc. 31st ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia (ACM MM), 2023, pp. 9070–9081

    2023

  6. [6]

    Rendering-Oriented 3D Point Cloud Attribute Compression Using Sparse Tensor-Based Transformer,

    X. Huo, J. Hou, S. Wan, and F. Yang, “Rendering-Oriented 3D Point Cloud Attribute Compression Using Sparse Tensor-Based Transformer,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 8283–8298, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Dynamic 3D Point Cloud Sequences as 2D Videos,

    Y . Zeng, J. Hou, Q. Zhang, S. Ren, and W. Wang, “Dynamic 3D Point Cloud Sequences as 2D Videos,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 9371–9386, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    [AI-GC][CfP-related] Improved Cross-Platform Reproducibility for AI-Based Point Cloud Compression,

    J. Zhanget al., “[AI-GC][CfP-related] Improved Cross-Platform Reproducibility for AI-Based Point Cloud Compression,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG7 m70395, 2024

    2024

  9. [9]

    Towards repro- ducible learning-based compression,

    J. Pang, M. A. Lodhi, J. Ahn, Y . Huang, and D. Tian, “Towards repro- ducible learning-based compression,” in2024 IEEE 26th Int. Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  10. [10]

    Deep geometry post-processing for decompressed point clouds,

    X. Fan, G. Li, D. Li, Y . Ren, W. Gao, and T. H. Li, “Deep geometry post-processing for decompressed point clouds,” in2022 IEEE Int. Conf. Multimedia and Expo (ICME), IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–6

    2022

  11. [11]

    G-pcc++: Enhanced geometry- based point cloud compression,

    J. Zhang, T. Chen, D. Ding, and Z. Ma, “G-pcc++: Enhanced geometry- based point cloud compression,” inProc. 31st ACM Int. Conf. Multime- dia (ACM MM), 2023, pp. 1352–1363

    2023

  12. [12]

    Grnet: Geometry restoration for g-pcc compressed point clouds using auxiliary density signaling,

    G. Liu, R. Xue, J. Li, D. Ding, and Z. Ma, “Grnet: Geometry restoration for g-pcc compressed point clouds using auxiliary density signaling,” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 6740–6753, 2023

    2023

  13. [13]

    Attribute artifacts removal for geometry-based point cloud compression,

    X. Sheng, L. Li, D. Liu, and Z. Xiong, “Attribute artifacts removal for geometry-based point cloud compression,”IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 31, pp. 3399–3413, 2022

    2022

  14. [14]

    GQE-Net: A graph- based quality enhancement network for point cloud color attribute,

    J. Xing, H. Yuan, R. Hamzaoui, H. Liu, and J. Hou, “GQE-Net: A graph- based quality enhancement network for point cloud color attribute,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 32, pp. 6303–6317, 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    Fast inter-frame motion prediction for compressed dynamic point cloud attribute enhancement,

    W. Liu, W. Gao, and X. Mu, “Fast inter-frame motion prediction for compressed dynamic point cloud attribute enhancement,” inProc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., 2024, pp. 3720–3728

    2024

  16. [16]

    Carnet: compression artifact reduction for point cloud attribute,

    D. Ding, J. Zhang, J. Wang, and Z. Ma, “Carnet: compression artifact reduction for point cloud attribute,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.08276, 2022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Occupancy-assisted attribute artifact reduction for video-based point cloud compression,

    L. Gao, Z. Li, L. Hou, Y . Xu, and J. Sun, “Occupancy-assisted attribute artifact reduction for video-based point cloud compression,”IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 667–680, 2024

    2024

  18. [18]

    A small-scale image U-Net-based color quality enhancement for dense point cloud,

    J. Xing, H. Yuan, W. Zhang, T. Guo, and C. Chen, “A small-scale image U-Net-based color quality enhancement for dense point cloud,”IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    UGAE: Unified Geometry and Attribute Enhancement for G-PCC Compressed Point Clouds,

    P. Zhao, H. Yuan, C. Tian, T. Guo, R. Hamzaoui, and Z. Pan, “UGAE: Unified Geometry and Attribute Enhancement for G-PCC Compressed Point Clouds,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2026, in press. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23009

    arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Encoding auxiliary information to restore compressed point cloud geometry,

    G. Liu, J. Zhu, D. Ding, and Z. Ma, “Encoding auxiliary information to restore compressed point cloud geometry,” inProc. 33rd Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI-24), 2024, pp. 2189–2197

    2024

  21. [21]

    PCE- GAN: A Generative Adversarial Network for Point Cloud Attribute Quality Enhancement Based on Optimal Transport,

    T. Guo, H. Yuan, Q. Liu, H. Su, R. Hamzaoui, and S. Kwong, “PCE- GAN: A Generative Adversarial Network for Point Cloud Attribute Quality Enhancement Based on Optimal Transport,”IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 34, pp. 6138–6151, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TIP.2025.3611178

    work page doi:10.1109/tip.2025.3611178 2025

  22. [22]

    GeoQE: Enhancing Quality of Experience in Point Cloud Streaming,

    J. Zhang, C. Han, D. Ding, and Z. Ma, “GeoQE: Enhancing Quality of Experience in Point Cloud Streaming,” inProc. 33rd ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia (ACM MM), 2025, pp. 6820–6829

    2025

  23. [23]

    STQE: Spatial-Temporal Attribute Quality Enhancement for G-PCC Compressed Dynamic Point Clouds,

    T. Guo, H. Yuan, X. Mao, S. Jiang, R. Hamzaoui, and S. Kwong, “STQE: Spatial-Temporal Attribute Quality Enhancement for G-PCC Compressed Dynamic Point Clouds,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.17522, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    4d spatio-temporal convnets: Minkowski convolutional neural networks,

    C. Choy, J. Gwak, and S. Savarese, “4d spatio-temporal convnets: Minkowski convolutional neural networks,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), 2019, pp. 3075–3084

    2019

  25. [25]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” inMedical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015, Springer, 2015, pp. 234– 241

    2015

  26. [26]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space,

    C. R. Qi, L. Yi, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas, “Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space,”Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  27. [27]

    Point cloud compression with implicit neural representations: A unified framework,

    H. Ruan, Y . Shao, Q. Yang, L. Zhao, and D. Niyato, “Point cloud compression with implicit neural representations: A unified framework,” in2024 IEEE/CIC Int. Conf. Communications in China (ICCC), IEEE, 2024, pp. 1709–1714

    2024

  28. [28]

    PU-GAN: a point cloud upsampling adversarial network,

    R. Li, X. Li, C.-W. Fu, D. Cohen-Or, and P.-A. Heng, “PU-GAN: a point cloud upsampling adversarial network,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), 2019, pp. 7203–7212

    2019

  29. [29]

    PU-Refiner: A geometry refiner with adversarial learning for point cloud upsampling,

    H. Liu, H. Yuan, R. Hamzaoui, W. Gao, and S. Li, “PU-Refiner: A geometry refiner with adversarial learning for point cloud upsampling,” inICASSP 2022–2022 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, 2022, pp. 2270–2274

    2022

  30. [30]

    PUFA-GAN: A frequency-aware generative adversarial network for 3D point cloud upsampling,

    H. Liu, H. Yuan, J. Hou, R. Hamzaoui, and W. Gao, “PUFA-GAN: A frequency-aware generative adversarial network for 3D point cloud upsampling,”IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 31, pp. 7389–7402, 2022

    2022

  31. [31]

    PU-Mask: 3D Point Cloud Upsampling via an Implicit Virtual Mask,

    H. Liu, H. Yuan, R. Hamzaoui, Q. Liu, and S. Li, “PU-Mask: 3D Point Cloud Upsampling via an Implicit Virtual Mask,”IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 2024

    2024

  32. [32]

    PU-GSM: A Latent Geometry-Guided Self-Similarity Model for Point Cloud Upsampling,

    H. Liu, H. Yuan, R. Hamzaoui, and W. Yan, “PU-GSM: A Latent Geometry-Guided Self-Similarity Model for Point Cloud Upsampling,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Pu-dense: Sparse tensor-based point cloud geometry upsampling,

    A. Akhtar, Z. Li, G. Van der Auwera, L. Li, and J. Chen, “Pu-dense: Sparse tensor-based point cloud geometry upsampling,”IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 31, pp. 4133–4148, 2022

    2022

  34. [34]

    Learning to restore compressed point cloud attribute: A fully data-driven approach and a rules-unrolling- based optimization,

    J. Zhang, J. Zhang, D. Ding, and Z. Ma, “Learning to restore compressed point cloud attribute: A fully data-driven approach and a rules-unrolling- based optimization,”IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1985–1998, 2024

    1985

  35. [35]

    ARNet: Attribute artifact reduction for G-PCC compressed point clouds,

    J. Zhang, J. Zhang, D. Ding, and Z. Ma, “ARNet: Attribute artifact reduction for G-PCC compressed point clouds,”Comput. Vis. Media (Beijing), 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    Dependence- Based Coarse-to-Fine Approach for Reducing Distortion Accumulation in G-PCC Attribute Compression,

    T. Guo, H. Yuan, R. Hamzaoui, X. Wang, and L. Wang, “Dependence- Based Coarse-to-Fine Approach for Reducing Distortion Accumulation in G-PCC Attribute Compression,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 11393–11403, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TII.2024.3403262

    work page doi:10.1109/tii.2024.3403262 2024

  37. [37]

    High Efficiency Wiener Filter-Based Point Cloud Quality Enhancement for MPEG G- PCC,

    Y . Wei, Z. Wang, T. Guo, H. Liu, L. Shen, and H. Yuan, “High Efficiency Wiener Filter-Based Point Cloud Quality Enhancement for MPEG G- PCC,”IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 9475–9486, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2025.3552049

    work page doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2025.3552049 2025

  38. [38]

    Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger,

    X. Wuet al., “Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), 2024, pp. 4840–4851

    2024

  39. [39]

    D-dpcc: Deep dynamic point cloud compression via 3d motion prediction,

    X. Fanet al., “D-dpcc: Deep dynamic point cloud compression via 3d motion prediction,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01135, 2022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Inter-frame compression for dynamic point cloud geometry coding,

    A. Akhtar, Z. Li, and G. Van der Auwera, “Inter-frame compression for dynamic point cloud geometry coding,”IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 33, pp. 584–594, 2024

    2024

  41. [41]

    8i V oxelized Full Bodies – A V oxelized Point Cloud Dataset,

    E. d’Eon, B. Harrison, T. Myers, and P. A. Chou, “8i V oxelized Full Bodies – A V oxelized Point Cloud Dataset,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG1 input document M74006 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 input docu- ment m40059, Jan. 2017

    2017

  42. [42]

    OWlii dynamic human mesh sequence dataset,

    Y . Xu and W. Y . Z. (as listed), “OWlii dynamic human mesh sequence dataset,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 MPEG Input document m41658, Oct. 2017

    2017

  43. [43]

    Microsoft V oxelized Upper Bodies – A V oxelized Point Cloud Dataset,

    C. Loopet al., “Microsoft V oxelized Upper Bodies – A V oxelized Point Cloud Dataset,” ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29 Joint WG11/WG1 (MPEG/JPEG) input document m38673/M72012, May 2016

    2016

  44. [44]

    Common Test Conditions for G-PCC,

    “Common Test Conditions for G-PCC,” document ISO/IEC Standard JTC1/SC29/WG7 MPEG N0368, Jul. 2022

    2022

  45. [45]

    On balancing attribute QPs for GeSTM,

    “On balancing attribute QPs for GeSTM,” document ISO/IEC Standard JTC1/SC29/WG7 MPEG M65830, Nov. 2023

    2023

  46. [46]

    PCQM: A full- reference quality metric for colored 3D point clouds,

    G. Meynet, Y . Nehm ´e, J. Digne, and G. Lavou ´e, “PCQM: A full- reference quality metric for colored 3D point clouds,” in2020 Twelfth Int. Conf. Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  47. [47]

    The bjøntegaard bible why your way of comparing video codecs may be wrong,

    C. Herglotzet al., “The bjøntegaard bible why your way of comparing video codecs may be wrong,”IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 33, pp. 987–1001, 2024

    2024

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.5 on July 13, 2026.