Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

For d ≥ 13, the degeneracy counting function of d-matrix theory is exactly reconstructible from its high-energy pole expansion, which converges absolutely.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 17:01 UTC pith:IGQRSJKB

load-bearing objection Solid new all-orders asymptotic machinery for d-matrix partition functions, with a genuine soft spot in the UV-reconstruction claim and an inconsistency in the fermionic critical dimension. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.29610 v2 pith:IGQRSJKB submitted 2026-03-31 hep-th math.CO

Critical dimensions and small cycle dominance from all-orders asymptotics of d-matrix theory

Yang Lei , Sanjaye Ramgoolam This is my paper
classification hep-th math.CO
keywords d-matrix theorypartition functionHagedorn transitionasymptotic expansionnatural boundarysmall-cycle dominancecritical dimensionDedekind eta
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper analyzes the d-matrix partition function Z_d(x) = ∏_{i=1}^∞ (1 - d x^i)^{-1}, which counts gauge-invariant polynomials built from d adjoint matrices in the large-N limit and describes the Hagedorn/deconfinement transition in supersymmetric gauge theory. The authors prove that its Taylor coefficients Z_d(K) have an all-orders asymptotic expansion of the form Z_d(K) ∼ Σ_{n=1}^∞ Σ_{j=0}^{n-1} c_{n;j} ω_n^{-jK} d^{K/n}, where each order n corresponds to a concentric circle of simple poles of radius d^{-1/n} accumulating toward the natural boundary |x|=1. They show the residues obey an exponential growth/decay law derived from the modular property of the Dedekind eta function, which implies the expansion is divergent for 2 ≤ d ≤ 12 but absolutely convergent for d ≥ 13 (and d ≥ 7 for the fermionic analogue). The paper also gives a combinatorial reading of the order n as the minimal cycle length of equivalence permutations, calling the resulting hierarchy 'small-cycle dominance.' If correct, the convergence result means that for d ≥ 13 the entire partition function, including its low-energy Taylor coefficients, can be exactly reconstructed from the high-energy pole data alone, with no additional input from the regime near x=0.

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a critical-dimension threshold for the d-matrix model: the all-orders asymptotic expansion of the degeneracy Z_d(K), built from the residues of poles at x_{n;j}=d^{-1/n}ω_n^j, is absolutely convergent for d ≥ 13 (Proposition 3.2) and divergent for 2 ≤ d ≤ 12 (Proposition 3.1). The residues are obtained by an iterative subtraction of polar parts, and their large-n asymptotics follows from the modular S-transformation of the Euler partition generating function, leading to the exponential factor exp[ (n ln d)/(24π^2(j^2 + ln^2 d/(4π^2))) (π^2 - F(d) - 12π^2 j^2) ] with F(d)=3 ln^2 d + 6 Li_2(1/d) - π^2; the sign of F(d)-π^2 at j=0 flips near d≈12.59, making the

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a Mittag-Leffler-style subtraction of polar parts: Z_d is meromorphic in the unit disk with simple poles on concentric circles of radius d^{-1/n}, accumulating at the natural boundary |x|=1. Subtracting each circle's pole contribution yields a remainder regular in a larger disk, generating a partial-fraction (geometric-series) expansion order by order. The residues c_{n;j} factor into a product that is controlled at large n by the modular S-transformation of the Dedekind eta function (via Z_1(x) = 1/(x;x)_∞), yielding the exponential growth/decay rate and hence the critical dimension. The combinatorial identity Z_l(x,y) = ∏_{i=l}^∞ 1/(1 - x^i - y^i) links the pole or

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the convergent partial-fraction limit S_{d;∞}(x) agrees exactly with the original partition function Z_d(x) for d≥13; the paper admits this is not proven and relies on numerical evidence, since a holomorphic function singular only on the boundary |x|=1 would be invisible to the pole analysis.

What would settle it

For d=13, evaluate the convergent series S_{13}(K) = Σ_{n=1}^N Σ_{j=0}^{n-1} c_{n;j} ω_n^{-jK} 13^{K/n} for N up to, say, 100 and compare against the exact coefficients Z_13(K) computed from the product formula for K=50; if the two disagree beyond the estimated truncation error, the UV-reconstruction claim fails. Equivalently, evaluate Z_d(x) and S_{d;∞}(x) at a point inside the unit disk away from all poles, e.g., x=0.5 for d=14, to high precision; any nonzero difference signals an invisible holomorphic correction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For d ≥ 13, the degeneracies Z_d(K) can be computed to arbitrary precision by a convergent sum over pole layers, with numerically negligible errors even at small K (e.g., K=6, d=14).
  • The fermionic counterpart Z^F_d(x) shows a similar transition at d_crit = 7, so the threshold is model-dependent rather than universal.
  • Small-cycle dominance organizes the asymptotics: the n-th order of the expansion corresponds to equivalence permutations whose minimal cycle length is n, and the l-th sector contributes at order d^{K/l}.
  • The partial-fraction/root-of-unity framework extends to arbitrary weighted partition functions (1 - w_n x^n)^{-1}, enabling all-orders asymptotics for sequences like w_n = n+1, with a natural reordering when pole radii are not monotone (w_n = n).

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equality S_{d;∞}(x) = Z_d(x) for d ≥ 13 rests on numerical evidence; proving it would require ruling out a holomorphic correction with singularities only on the boundary |x|=1, and a counterexample would weaken the UV-reconstruction claim.
  • The coincidence of the bosonic critical dimension with the black-string transition dimension (D≈13.5) noted in the paper suggests a possible common large-dimension mechanism between matrix counting and classical gravity instabilities; this is speculative and not established by the present analysis.
  • For 2 ≤ d ≤ 12, the divergent asymptotic series may be resummable via resurgence techniques, with the natural-boundary contributions acting as non-perturbative sectors; the paper explicitly draws this parallel and leaves the precise handling open.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the large-N partition function Z_d(x)=∏_{i=1}^∞ (1-d x^i)^{-1} for counting gauge-invariant operators in d-matrix models. It derives an all-orders asymptotic expansion for the degeneracies Z_d(K) as a sum over poles lying on concentric circles of radii d^{-1/n}, with terms c_{n;j} ω_n^{-jK} d^{K/n}. Using modular properties of the Dedekind eta function, it estimates the large-n growth of the residues and concludes that the pole expansion is absolutely convergent for d≥13 (and for d≥7 in a fermionic analogue), so that the partition function can, in this regime, be ‘completely reconstructed’ from its high-energy limit. The paper also gives a combinatorial interpretation of the expansion orders in terms of small cycles of equivalence permutations, and extends the circle-of-poles method to weighted partition generating functions.

Significance. If the central claims are established, this is a significant contribution: it provides a systematic all-orders asymptotic expansion for a class of partition functions with a natural boundary, identifies a sharp critical dimension, and connects the analytic pole structure to an independent combinatorial small-cycle mechanism. The paper contains explicit residue computations, optimal-truncation numerics, OEIS cross-checks, and an independent combinatorial re-derivation of the first two exponential orders, all of which are valuable. The main advertised conclusion—complete UV reconstruction for d≥13—is, however, conditional on an identity that is numerically supported but not proven, so the current significance is somewhat weaker than the abstract suggests.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Prop. 3.3 and Eq. (3.21)] The paper’s central claim that for d≥13 the partition function Z_d(x) is completely reconstructed from the UV pole data requires the identity S_{d;∞}(x)=Z_d(x). Proposition 3.3 only proves uniform convergence of the partial-fraction sums to some holomorphic limit S_{d;∞}(x); it does not identify that limit with Z_d(x). The difference H=Z_d−S_{d;∞} is holomorphic in |x|<1 and is invisible to the pole subtraction, as the example (1−x)^{-1} in Eq. (3.18) shows. The numerical evidence in Eqs. (3.19)–(3.20), while striking, is finite-precision and cannot rule out a holomorphic correction. The abstract and Section 7 nevertheless state the reconstruction as an established fact. This is a load-bearing gap: either prove the absence of holomorphic corrections, or explicitly present S_{d;∞}=Z_d as a conjecture and soften the claims accordingly.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (3.8) and Props. 3.1–3.2] The critical dimension and the convergence/divergence dichotomy rest entirely on the large-n estimate for the residues c_{n;j} in Eq. (3.8). This formula is introduced with ‘Consequently’ but no derivation or quantifiable error bound is provided. In particular, the sign of F(d)−π^2 for the j=0 term controls whether |c_{n;0}| grows or decays exponentially, and this sign is what separates d≤12 from d≥13. The proof of Proposition 3.2 uses the asymptotic (3.8) to assert the existence of N_1 and A, and Proposition 3.1 likewise depends on the same unproved estimate. For theorem-level claims, the residue asymptotics should either be proven with explicit uniform error terms or be stated as a conjecture that the rest of the paper assumes.
  3. [§3.2, Eqs. (3.27)–(3.28)] The fermionic critical dimension is derived with considerably less detail than the bosonic one: the functional F(d;j) is stated without derivation, the residue asymptotics in (3.28) are given without error bounds, and the conclusion d^F_⋆=6 is immediately followed by the estimate d≈6.111, leaving the integer threshold somewhat ambiguous. Moreover, the same S_{d;∞}=Z_d identification issue applies to the fermionic partial-fraction expansion. Please supply the missing derivations/bounds, or present this part as conjectural, and ensure the integer statement ‘d^F_⋆=6’ is consistent with the asymptotic estimate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.4)] The statement that the representation (3.3) ‘implies’ the error bound (3.4) is not generally valid for asymptotic series with oscillatory coefficients; the next term need not bound the remainder. If this bound is not used in the proofs, consider removing it or rephrasing it as a heuristic/observed property.
  2. [Eq. (3.16)] The definition of S_M(x) contains an unexplained leading ‘1’ and a factor d^{1/n}ω_n^{-j}x inside the partial-fraction term; please check the normalization and clarify the notation so that S_M(0)=Z_d(0) is manifest.
  3. [§4.2.1, around Eqs. (4.19)–(4.36)] The notation P_2^+(n) and P_{l+1}^+(n) is used before being defined. Please define the disjoint-union decomposition explicitly and keep the notation consistent with the earlier P_l(K) definition.
  4. [Table 2] The column ‘Order of Z_2(K_+)’ lists entries such as ‘105’ and ‘1012’; these appear to be orders of magnitude but are not typeset clearly. Please indicate whether these are powers of ten and, if so, write them as 10^5, 10^{12}, etc.
  5. [§2.1, Figure 2] The caption says ‘the vertical axis is log of the error’ but the axes are not labelled in the text; please provide explicit axis labels or state the plotted quantity in the caption. Minor typos such as ‘pictorically dictated’ should also be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the pole expansion and the small-cycle matching are independent derivations; the UV-reconstruction claim rests on an explicitly flagged unproven equality, not on a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. The all-orders pole expansion (3.3) is obtained by computing residues of Z_d(x) at the poles x_{n;j}=d^{-1/n}\omega^j_n; the coefficients c_{n;j} are evaluated analytically, not fitted, and the partial-fraction argument is a genuine complex-analytic re-expression. The critical dimension d_crit=13 follows from the large-n asymptotics of these residues, which uses the modular property of the Euler partition function Z_1 and an exponential-summation estimate; it is not obtained by fitting to the sequence being predicted. The combinatorial small-cycle analysis in Section 4 is an independent re-derivation from the permutation-sum representation: it evaluates the P_1 and P_2 sector contributions and matches the constants obtained from residues, serving as a consistency check rather than as the source of the expansion. Self-citations to [32], [35], and [36] supply definitions and background identities that are either proved in the text or standard, and they do not carry the target convergence result. The one serious caveat is flagged by the paper itself: Proposition 3.3 proves only that the partial-fraction sums converge uniformly to some meromorphic limit S_{d;∞}(x), and Section 3.1 explicitly acknowledges 'A remaining question is whether this limit agrees exactly with the original generating function Z_d(x)' and notes that holomorphic functions such as 1/(1-x) are invisible to the interior pole analysis. The abstract's 'complete reconstruction from the UV limit' therefore depends on an unproven equality, but this is a correctness/rigor gap, not circular reasoning: the missing step is an assumption about boundary holomorphic corrections, not a reuse of the conclusion. Accordingly, the circularity score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central derivation has no fitted free parameters: the leading constant 3.46275 is a residue. The main unproved input is the holomorphic-ambiguity assumption; the remaining axioms are standard. No new entities are postulated.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Large-N counting formula Z_d(x)=∏_{i≥1}(1-d x^i)^{-1} applies to gauge-invariant operators of d-matrix models
    Taken from prior literature [27,28]; the paper does not derive the N→∞ limit that yields this product.
  • standard math Singularity analysis theorems (Flajolet-Sedgewick IV.7, IV.10) as formulated in Lemmas 5.1, 5.2
    Used to translate pole layers into coefficient asymptotics; standard analytic combinatorics.
  • standard math Modular transformation of the Euler partition generating function Z_1 (Dedekind eta) as in Eq. (2.16)
    Used to estimate residues c^-_{n;j} in the n→∞ limit; standard modular property.
  • ad hoc to paper Equality of the pole-expansion limit S_{d;∞}(x) with Z_d(x) for d≥13 (no holomorphic correction invisible to interior poles)
    Explicitly unproven in Section 3.1, supported only by numerical evidence; required for the UV-reconstruction claim.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 37199 in / 17307 out tokens · 138651 ms · 2026-08-02T17:01:51.393938+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Supersymmetric sectors of $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory motivate the study of the partition function for the counting of gauge-invariant functions of $d=2,3$ matrices transforming under the adjoint action of $U(N)$. The partition function $ \mathcal{Z}_d ( x) $ in the large $N$ limit has a known Hagedorn phase transition at $ x = d^{-1} $ which provides a simple model for the phase structure of the thermal partition function of SYM. We study the all-orders asymptotic expansion of $ \mathcal{Z}_d(x)$ based on a geometric picture of concentric circles of poles in the complex plane accumulating in a natural boundary at $|x| =1$. We find that the order by order structure has a precise combinatorial interpretation organized in terms of increasing cycle size of permutations arising in the enumeration of the invariants. We refer to this organization as small-cycle dominance, and find that it extends to refined versions of the partition functions depending on several complex variables. An analysis of the coefficients in the asymptotic expansion of $ \mathcal{Z}_d(x) $ using the modular property of the Dedekind eta function reveals that the asymptotic expansion is actually convergent for $d\ge d_{ \rm crit } = 13$. A fermionic version of $\mathcal{Z}_d (x)$ has an analogous critical dimension of $ d_{ \rm crit} = 7$. This distinction indicates that the partition functions of the matrix models can be completely reconstructed from their high-energy (UV) limit for $d\ge d_{ \rm crit}$ whereas additional input is required to reconstruct the exact coefficients of the low-energy (IR) expansion for $2\le d \le d_{ \rm crit } -1 $.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An exact algorithm for U(N) matrix models in the gauge-invariant singlet sector

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A group-theoretic algorithm computes U(N)-singlet Hamiltonian matrix elements as closed-form polynomials in N, validated for one matrix against the exact fermion mapping.

  2. Negative heat capacities in spherically symmetric sectors of $d$-matrix quantum mechanics

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SO(d) and O(d) invariant sectors of d-matrix QM show negative microcanonical heat capacity that becomes positive at k_crit ~ N^2/4, forming a caloric fold similar to AdS black holes.

  3. Negative heat capacities in spherically symmetric sectors of $d$-matrix quantum mechanics

    hep-th 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    In SO(d)- and O(d)-invariant sectors of the U(N) d-matrix harmonic oscillator, microcanonical heat capacity is negative at low energy and turns positive at kcrit ~ N^2/4, producing a caloric fold analogous to AdS black holes.

  4. Finite scalar field theory with SU(1,1) spacetime symmetry from near-BPS limits of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A non-Lorentzian scalar QFT with SU(1,1) symmetry obtained from N=4 SYM is finite at all orders in perturbation theory.

  5. Gram--Wishart--Stiefel formulation of the $N=2$, large--$d$ gauge theory in 1D

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Gram/Wishart/Stiefel reformulation of N=2 large-d BFSS/BMN endpoints absorbs -A into a shifted mass and recovers the universal continuum -2d DΛ-channel after non-polynomial transverse completion.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page,Thermodynamics of black holes in anti-de sitter space,Communications in Mathematical Physics87(1983) 577–588

    1983

  5. [5]

    Witten,Anti-de sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics2(1998) 505–532, [hep-th/9803131]

    E. Witten,Anti-de sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics2(1998) 505–532, [hep-th/9803131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Sundborg,The Hagedorn transition, deconfinement and N=4 SYM theory,Nucl

    B. Sundborg,The Hagedorn transition, deconfinement and N=4 SYM theory,Nucl. Phys. B573(2000) 349–363, [hep-th/9908001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Aharony, J

    O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas and M. Van Raamsdonk,The Hagedorn - deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8(2004) 603–696, [hep-th/0310285]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    Bianchi, F

    M. Bianchi, F. A. Dolan, P. J. Heslop and H. Osborn,N=4 superconformal characters and partition functions,Nucl. Phys. B767(2007) 163–226, [hep-th/0609179]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    Beisert,The Dilatation operator of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory and integrability, Phys

    N. Beisert,The Dilatation operator of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory and integrability, Phys. Rept.405(2004) 1–202, [hep-th/0407277]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    Corley, A

    S. Corley, A. Jevicki and S. Ramgoolam,Exact correlators of giant gravitons from dual N=4 SYM theory,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.5(2002) 809–839, [hep-th/0111222]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  11. [11]

    Kimura and S

    Y. Kimura and S. Ramgoolam,Branes, anti-branes and brauer algebras in gauge-gravity duality,JHEP11(2007) 078, [0709.2158]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  12. [12]

    T. W. Brown, P. J. Heslop and S. Ramgoolam,Diagonal multi-matrix correlators and BPS operators in N=4 SYM,JHEP02(2008) 030, [0711.0176]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    R. Bhattacharyya, S. Collins and R. de Mello Koch,Exact Multi-Matrix Correlators, JHEP03(2008) 044, [0801.2061]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    Bhattacharyya, R

    R. Bhattacharyya, R. de Mello Koch and M. Stephanou,Exact Multi-Restricted Schur Polynomial Correlators,JHEP06(2008) 101, [0805.3025]. – 52 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    T. W. Brown, P. J. Heslop and S. Ramgoolam,Diagonal free field matrix correlators, global symmetries and giant gravitons,JHEP04(2009) 089, [0806.1911]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    Kimura and S

    Y. Kimura and S. Ramgoolam,Enhanced symmetries of gauge theory and resolving the spectrum of local operators,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 126003, [0807.3696]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  17. [17]

    Harmark, K

    T. Harmark, K. R. Kristjansson and M. Orselli,Decoupling limits ofN= 4super Yang-Mills onR×S 3,JHEP09(2007) 115, [0707.1621]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  18. [18]

    Harmark and M

    T. Harmark and M. Orselli,Spin Matrix Theory: A quantum mechanical model of the AdS/CFT correspondence,JHEP11(2014) 134, [1409.4417]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Harmark and N

    T. Harmark and N. Wintergerst,Nonrelativistic Corners ofN= 4Supersymmetric Yang–Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 171602, [1912.05554]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Baiguera, T

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark and N. Wintergerst,Nonrelativistic near-BPS corners of N= 4super-Yang-Mills withSU(1,1)symmetry,JHEP02(2021) 188, [2009.03799]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Baiguera, T

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark, Y. Lei and N. Wintergerst,Symmetry structure of the interactions in near-BPS corners ofN= 4super-Yang-Mills,JHEP04(2021) 029, [2012.08532]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Baiguera, T

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark and Y. Lei,Spin Matrix Theory in near 1 8 -BPS corners of N= 4 super-Yang-Mills,JHEP02(2022) 191, [2111.10149]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Baiguera, T

    S. Baiguera, T. Harmark and Y. Lei,The Panorama of Spin Matrix theory,JHEP04 (2023) 075, [2211.16519]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    O’Connor and S

    D. O’Connor and S. Ramgoolam,Permutation invariant matrix quantum thermodynamics and negative specific heat capacities in large N systems,JHEP12 (2024) 161, [2405.13150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Hanada and J

    M. Hanada and J. Maltz,A proposal of the gauge theory description of the small Schwarzschild black hole in AdS 5×S5,JHEP02(2017) 012, [1608.03276]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Berenstein,Submatrix deconfinement and small black holes in AdS,JHEP09 (2018) 054, [1806.05729]

    D. Berenstein,Submatrix deconfinement and small black holes in AdS,JHEP09 (2018) 054, [1806.05729]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    F. A. Dolan,Counting BPS operators in N=4 SYM,Nucl. Phys. B790(2008) 432–464, [0704.1038]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  28. [28]

    J. F. Willenbring,Stable hilbert series ofS(g) k for classical groups,Journal of Algebra314(2007) 844–871, [math/0510649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  29. [29]

    Sequence A070933 in The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences

    OEIS Foundation Inc., “Sequence A070933 in The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.”https://oeis.org/A070933, 2026

    2026

  30. [30]

    H. Rademacher,On the partition function p(n),Proceedings of the London Mathematical Societys2-43(1938) 241–254, [https://londmathsoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1112/plms/s2-43.4.241]. – 53 –

    work page doi:10.1112/plms/s2-43.4.241 1938

  31. [31]

    Flajolet and R

    P. Flajolet and R. Sedgewick,Analytic Combinatorics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009

    2009

  32. [32]

    Pasukonis and S

    J. Pasukonis and S. Ramgoolam,Quivers as Calculators: Counting, Correlators and Riemann Surfaces,JHEP04(2013) 094, [1301.1980]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  33. [33]

    Ben Geloun and S

    J. Ben Geloun and S. Ramgoolam,Counting tensor model observables and branched covers of the 2-sphere,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact.1(2014) 77–138, [1307.6490]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Ben Geloun and S

    J. Ben Geloun and S. Ramgoolam,Tensor Models, Kronecker coefficients and Permutation Centralizer Algebras,JHEP11(2017) 092, [1708.03524]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Ben Geloun and S

    J. Ben Geloun and S. Ramgoolam,All-orders asymptotics of tensor model observables from symmetries of restricted partitions,J. Phys. A55(2022) 435203, [2106.01470]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Ramgoolam, M

    S. Ramgoolam, M. C. Wilson and A. Zahabi,Quiver Asymptotics:N= 1Free Chiral Ring,J. Phys. A53(2020) 105401, [1811.11229]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    J. J. Atick and E. Witten,The Hagedorn Transition and the Number of Degrees of Freedom of String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B310(1988) 291–334

    1988

  38. [38]

    A. M. Polyakov,Gauge fields and space-time,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A17S1(2002) 119–136, [hep-th/0110196]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  39. [39]

    Rademacher,A convergent series for the partition function p (n),Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences23(1937) 78–84

    H. Rademacher,A convergent series for the partition function p (n),Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences23(1937) 78–84

    1937

  40. [40]

    Dijkgraaf, J

    R. Dijkgraaf, J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore and E. P. Verlinde,A Black hole Farey tail,hep-th/0005003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Manschot and G

    J. Manschot and G. W. Moore,A Modern Farey Tail,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.4 (2010) 103–159, [0712.0573]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    Cabo-Bizet and S

    A. Cabo-Bizet and S. Murthy,Supersymmetric phases of 4dN= 4 SYM at largeN, JHEP09(2020) 184, [1909.09597]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Arabi Ardehali and S

    A. Arabi Ardehali and S. Murthy,The 4d superconformal index near roots of unity and 3d Chern-Simons theory,JHEP10(2021) 207, [2104.02051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Jejjala, Y

    V. Jejjala, Y. Lei, S. van Leuven and W. Li,SL(3,Z) Modularity and New Cardy limits of theN= 4 superconformal index,JHEP11(2021) 047, [2104.07030]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Aharony, F

    O. Aharony, F. Benini, O. Mamroud and E. Milan,A gravity interpretation for the Bethe Ansatz expansion of theN= 4SYM index,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 086026, [2104.13932]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Lei and S

    Y. Lei and S. van Leuven,Modularity in d>2 free conformal field theory,JHEP11 (2024) 023, [2406.01567]. – 54 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Jejjala, Y

    V. Jejjala, Y. Lei, S. van Leuven and W. Li,Modular factorization of superconformal indices,JHEP10(2023) 105, [2210.17551]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    L. F. Alday and J.-B. Bae,Rademacher Expansions and the Spectrum of 2d CFT, JHEP11(2020) 134, [2001.00022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    J. L. Cardy,Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories, Nucl. Phys. B270(1986) 186–204

    1986

  50. [50]

    O’Connor,Trace relations and matrix models, tech

    D. O’Connor,Trace relations and matrix models, tech. rep., Erwin Schr¨ odinger International Institute for Mathematics and Physics (ESI), 2023

    2023

  51. [51]

    Zagier,The dilogarithm function, inFrontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry II: On Conformal Field Theories, Discrete Groups and Renormalization, pp

    D. Zagier,The dilogarithm function, inFrontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry II: On Conformal Field Theories, Discrete Groups and Renormalization, pp. 3–65. Springer, 2007

    2007

  52. [52]

    G. H. Hardy and S. Ramanujan,Asymptotic formulaæ in combinatory analysis, Proceedings of The London Mathematical Society75–115

  53. [53]

    Ferrari,The largeDlimit of planar diagrams,Ann

    F. Ferrari,The largeDlimit of planar diagrams,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact.6(2019) 427–448, [1701.01171]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Ferrari, V

    F. Ferrari, V. Rivasseau and G. Valette,A New LargeNExpansion for General Matrix–Tensor Models,Commun. Math. Phys.370(2019) 403–448, [1709.07366]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Azeyanagi, F

    T. Azeyanagi, F. Ferrari, P. Gregori, L. Leduc and G. Valette,More on the New LargeDLimit of Matrix Models,Annals Phys.393(2018) 308–326, [1710.07263]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Carrozza, F

    S. Carrozza, F. Ferrari, A. Tanasa and G. Valette,On the largeDexpansion of Hermitian multi-matrix models,J. Math. Phys.61(2020) 073501, [2003.04152]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Bonzom, V

    V. Bonzom, V. Nador and A. Tanasa,Double scaling limit of multi-matrix models at large D,J. Phys. A56(2023) 075201, [2209.02026]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Emparan, R

    R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe,The large D limit of General Relativity, JHEP06(2013) 009, [1302.6382]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    Emparan and C

    R. Emparan and C. P. Herzog,Large D limit of Einstein’s equations,Rev. Mod. Phys. 92(2020) 045005, [2003.11394]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Sorkin,A Critical dimension in the black string phase transition,Phys

    E. Sorkin,A Critical dimension in the black string phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(2004) 031601, [hep-th/0402216]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  61. [61]

    Suzuki and K

    R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe,Non-uniform black strings and the critical dimension in the 1/Dexpansion,JHEP10(2015) 107, [1506.01890]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  62. [62]

    Kol and E

    B. Kol and E. Sorkin,LG (Landau-Ginzburg) in GL (Gregory-Laflamme),Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 4563–4592, [hep-th/0604015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  63. [63]

    Harmark and N

    T. Harmark and N. A. Obers,Phases of Kaluza-Klein black holes: A Brief review, hep-th/0503020. – 55 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Kol,The Phase transition between caged black holes and black strings: A Review, Phys

    B. Kol,The Phase transition between caged black holes and black strings: A Review, Phys. Rept.422(2006) 119–165, [hep-th/0411240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  65. [65]

    A. T. Kristensson and M. Wilhelm,From Hagedorn to Lee-Yang: partition functions ofN= 4 SYM theory at finite N,JHEP10(2020) 006, [2005.06480]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson,A course of modern analysis. Courier Dover Publications, 2020

    2020

  67. [67]

    Padellaro, S

    A. Padellaro, S. Ramgoolam and R. Suzuki,Eigenvalue systems for integer orthogonal bases of multi-matrix invariants at finite N,JHEP02(2025) 111, [2410.13631]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Ramgoolam,Schur-Weyl duality as an instrument of Gauge-String duality,AIP Conf

    S. Ramgoolam,Schur-Weyl duality as an instrument of Gauge-String duality,AIP Conf. Proc.1031(2008) 255–265, [0804.2764]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    Ramgoolam,Permutations and the combinatorics of gauge invariants for general N,PoSCORFU2015(2016) 107, [1605.00843]

    S. Ramgoolam,Permutations and the combinatorics of gauge invariants for general N,PoSCORFU2015(2016) 107, [1605.00843]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    de Mello Koch, M

    R. de Mello Koch, M. Kim and A. L. Mahu,A pedagogical introduction to restricted Schur polynomials with applications to heavy operators,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39 (2024) 2430003, [2409.15751]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Ramgoolam,Finite-dimensional algebras, gauge-string duality and thermodynamics, 2, 2026.2602.04845

    S. Ramgoolam,Finite-dimensional algebras, gauge-string duality and thermodynamics, 2, 2026.2602.04845

    arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    Burnside’s lemma

    Wikipedia, “Burnside’s lemma.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnside%27s_lemma

  73. [73]

    O’Connor and S

    D. O’Connor and S. Ramgoolam,Gauged permutation invariant tensor quantum mechanics, least common multiples and the inclusion-exclusion principle,2506.18813

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [74]

    Pemantle, M

    R. Pemantle, M. C. Wilson and S. Melczer,Analytic Combinatorics in Several Variables. Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2024

    2024

  75. [75]

    Asymptotic expansion

    “Asymptotic expansion.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 2025

    2025

  76. [76]

    F. W. J. Olver,Asymptotics and Special Functions. Academic Press, New York, 1974

    1974

  77. [77]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag,Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw–Hill, New York, 1978

    1978

  78. [78]

    Sequence A074141 in The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences

    OEIS Foundation Inc., “Sequence A074141 in The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.”https://oeis.org/A074141, 2026

    2026

  79. [79]

    Sequence A006906 in The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences

    OEIS Foundation Inc., “Sequence A006906 in The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences.”https://oeis.org/A006906, 2026

    2026

  80. [80]

    A. V. Sills and R. Schneider,The product of parts or” norm” of a partition, INTEGERS20A(2020) 16, [1904.08004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.