Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 2 cited by

Combined JWST spectra of HAT-P-12b detect four molecules and show that single instruments overestimate abundances while NIRISS is required for non-gray clouds.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 14:28 UTC pith:XB3ULBQC

load-bearing objection Abstract-only read of a useful JWST multi-instrument information-content study of HAT-P-12b; the supplied full text is the wrong paper, so detections and reduction tests cannot be checked. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2604.01219 v1 pith:XB3ULBQC submitted 2026-04-01 astro-ph.EP

Information content of JWST transmission spectroscopy of the exoplanet HAT-P-12b from the optical to the mid-infrared

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords exoplanet atmospherestransmission spectroscopyJWSTHAT-P-12batmospheric retrievalmolecular detectioncloudsC/O ratio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows what different JWST instruments actually contribute when characterizing the atmosphere of the warm sub-Saturn HAT-P-12b. A new NIRISS SOSS transit spectrum is combined with existing NIRSpec G395M and MIRI LRS data, and atmospheric retrievals are run on every instrument combination (sometimes with archival HST). Four molecules are significantly detected: water, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide. Water alone can be seen without NIRSpec; the other three, and especially H2S, need the broader coverage that multi-instrument data provide. NIRISS is essential for establishing that the clouds are non-gray and produce a moderate scattering slope. Single-instrument retrievals systematically return higher abundances than the joint datasets, and the derived C/O ratio still depends on which NIRSpec reduction is used. The work therefore maps the information content of JWST wavelength coverage for this planet type and shows why combining instruments yields more reliable chemistry and cloud constraints.

Core claim

Four molecules (H2O, CO2, CO, H2S) are significantly detected in HAT-P-12b’s transmission spectrum. Except for H2O, the detections require NIRSpec coverage; H2S appears only in multi-instrument retrievals. NIRISS SOSS is required to establish robust evidence for non-gray clouds with a moderate scattering slope (p < 4). Single-instrument retrievals tend to overestimate abundances, while combined JWST datasets produce more consistent constraints; the C/O ratio remains sensitive to differences between NIRSpec reductions.

What carries the argument

Atmospheric retrievals performed on every combination of JWST instruments (NIRISS SOSS, NIRSpec G395M, MIRI LRS), with and without archival HST data, that isolate which spectral windows drive each molecular detection, cloud-parameter constraint and abundance posterior.

Load-bearing premise

Differences between retrieval results for different instrument combinations and NIRSpec reductions mainly reflect true information content of the wavelength coverage rather than residual systematics, reduction-dependent noise or incomplete cloud and chemistry models.

What would settle it

An independent reduction of the same NIRSpec data that removes the reported C/O discrepancy, or a new multi-instrument retrieval that fails to recover H2S at the claimed significance while preserving the other three molecules, would falsify the information-content ranking.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Joint JWST retrievals should be preferred over single-instrument analyses when absolute molecular abundances are the science goal.
  • NIRISS SOSS coverage is required whenever non-gray cloud scattering slopes must be robustly measured.
  • H2S detections in similar warm sub-Saturns will generally need multi-instrument data rather than NIRSpec alone.
  • C/O ratios derived from NIRSpec will remain reduction-dependent until pipeline differences are resolved.
  • The same instrument-ranking exercise can be repeated for other planet types to map how information content scales with temperature and gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If single-instrument abundance overestimates are systematic, published JWST chemistry for many exoplanets may need downward revision once full-wavelength coverage is available.
  • The moderate scattering slope (p < 4) recovered here may become a standard diagnostic that distinguishes cloud particle-size regimes across the warm-Saturn population.
  • Future observing programs that allocate only NIRSpec or only MIRI time for chemistry will systematically miss H2S and under-constrain clouds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The abstract of the paper under review (arXiv:2604.01219) claims a new JWST NIRISS SOSS transit observation of the warm sub-Saturn HAT-P-12b, combined with NIRSpec G395M and MIRI LRS (and selected HST) data, to assess information content across instruments. It reports significant detections of H2O, CO2, CO, and H2S; states that CO2/CO require NIRSpec and H2S only multi-instrument retrievals; that NIRISS is essential for non-gray cloud evidence with moderate scattering slope p < 4; that single-instrument retrievals overestimate abundances relative to combined JWST datasets; and that C/O remains sensitive to NIRSpec reduction choices, with broad agreement to WASP-39b studies. However, the full manuscript text supplied for review is an entirely different work (arXiv:2604.01218) on beaming of polarized radiation in subcritical X-ray pulsars, not the HAT-P-12b transmission-spectroscopy analysis.

Significance. If the abstract claims hold under a proper full manuscript, the work would be a useful multi-instrument JWST information-content study for a sub-Saturn, with practical guidance on which bands drive molecular detections, cloud constraints, and abundance biases. That would be of clear interest for exoplanet atmosphere characterization. As submitted for this review, however, the significance of 2604.01219 cannot be assessed: the load-bearing retrieval results, reduction tests, detection metrics, and instrument-combination comparisons are not present in the provided full text.

major comments (2)
  1. The full manuscript text provided for review does not match the paper under consideration. The abstract and metadata describe JWST transmission spectroscopy of HAT-P-12b (arXiv:2604.01219, astro-ph.EP), but the body is the unrelated paper “Beaming of polarized radiation in subcritical X-ray pulsars” (arXiv:2604.01218, astro-ph.HE). No spectra, reduction variants, retrieval setup, posteriors, Bayes factors, or instrument-combination tables for HAT-P-12b are available. A scientific review of the claimed molecular detections, cloud slope, abundance overestimates, and C/O sensitivity is therefore impossible until the correct manuscript is supplied.
  2. Even taking the abstract at face value, the central claim—that differences between instrument combinations primarily measure true wavelength information content—cannot be stress-tested without the actual retrieval model (cloud parameterization, chemistry priors, T–P structure), reduction-dependent error budgets, and quantitative detection metrics (e.g., Bayes factors for H2S). The abstract’s H2S-only-in-multi-instrument and C/O-sensitive-to-NIRSpec-reduction statements are load-bearing and require those materials.
minor comments (1)
  1. No minor presentation comments can be made on the HAT-P-12b analysis because its full text was not provided. The supplied X-ray-pulsar manuscript is outside the scope of this review assignment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: available claims are empirical retrieval outcomes from spectra, not results forced by definition, self-fit, or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

Only the HAT-P-12b abstract is available for the stated paper (2604.01219); the supplied full manuscript is the unrelated X-ray-pulsar beaming paper (2604.01218) and cannot be used to audit the JWST derivation chain. On the abstract alone, the load-bearing claims—significant detections of H2O, CO2, CO, and H2S; NIRSpec required for all but H2O; H2S only in multi-instrument runs; NIRISS needed for non-gray clouds with moderate scattering slope p<4; single-instrument abundance overestimates; C/O sensitivity to NIRSpec reductions—are presented as comparative atmospheric-retrieval outputs from observed JWST (and selected HST) spectra, not as quantities defined by or fitted to the same targets they purport to predict. None of the six circularity patterns is exhibited: there is no self-definitional identity, no fitted parameter renamed as an independent prediction, no uniqueness theorem imported from overlapping authors, no ansatz smuggled via self-citation, and no mere renaming of a known empirical pattern. Domain-standard retrieval dependence on chemistry/cloud basis sets is a model-assumption risk, not circularity by construction under the stated criteria. Honest non-finding: score 0, empty steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review of an observational retrieval paper. Load-bearing inputs are standard exoplanet-atmosphere modeling choices (1D transmission geometry, molecular opacities, cloud/scattering parameterization, chemical abundance parameterization, instrument systematics treatments) plus free parameters fitted in retrievals. No new physical entities are introduced. Free-parameter list is incomplete without the methods section; entries below are those the abstract itself makes load-bearing.

free parameters (4)
  • molecular abundances (H2O, CO2, CO, H2S)
    Retrieved quantities whose 'detections' and single- vs multi-instrument biases are central claims; values not given in abstract.
  • scattering slope index p
    Abstract claims moderate slope with p < 4 as a consistent retrieval result; p is a fitted cloud/haze parameter.
  • C/O ratio
    Reported as sensitive to NIRSpec reduction choice; derived from fitted carbon- and oxygen-bearing abundances.
  • cloud/haze optical properties and vertical structure parameters
    Required to claim non-gray cloud behavior and NIRISS’s unique role; not specified in abstract.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption 1D transmission spectrum models with parameterized T–P, chemistry, and clouds adequately represent the observed transit depths for information-content comparison.
    Standard retrieval premise; if 3D effects or unmodeled stellar contamination dominate, instrument-combination conclusions shift.
  • domain assumption Differences between instrument combinations primarily trace wavelength coverage and precision, not reduction-specific residual systematics.
    Abstract itself notes C/O sensitivity to NIRSpec reductions, partially undermining a pure information-content reading.
  • domain assumption Molecular line lists and continuum opacities used in the retrievals are accurate enough that non-detections/detections are not opacity artifacts.
    Implicit for claiming significant detections of CO, CO2, H2S.
  • domain assumption Archival HST data, when included, are on a consistent absolute transit-depth scale with JWST reductions.
    Selected cases include HST; absolute offset systematics can mimic slopes and abundance shifts.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 21085 in / 2872 out tokens · 28970 ms · 2026-07-13T14:28:49.990013+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) provides low- to medium-resolution spectra with unprecedented precision and broad near- to mid-infrared wavelength coverage, enabling detailed characterization of exoplanet atmospheres. We present a new JWST NIRISS SOSS transit observation of the warm sub-Saturn HAT-P-12b. Combined with NIRSpec G395M and MIRI LRS data, this enables an assessment of the information content across JWST instruments over the full accessible wavelength range. The NIRISS data were reduced and the impact of reduction choices on the transmission spectrum evaluated. Atmospheric retrievals were performed for all JWST combinations, with selected cases including archival HST data. Four molecules are significantly detected: H2O, CO2, CO, and H2S. Except for H2O, detections require NIRSpec coverage, while H2S is only detected in multi-instrument retrievals. NIRISS SOSS is essential to establish robust evidence for non-gray cloud behavior. A moderate scattering slope (p < 4) is consistently retrieved. Single-instrument retrievals tend to overestimate abundances, whereas combined JWST datasets yield more consistent constraints. The C/O ratio remains sensitive to differences between NIRSpec reductions. Results broadly agree with studies of WASP-39b, but highlight variations in information content across exoplanet types.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Precise Determination of the Metallicity and C/O of WASP-39~b From a Single JWST Instrument Mode with Phase-Resolved Cross-Correlation Retrievals

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Phase-resolved cross-correlation retrieval on a single JWST G395H transit of WASP-39 b detects CO and yields bounded C/O (0.68) and metallicity (1.2 dex), previously requiring multi-instrument coverage.

  2. HAT-P-70b through the Eyes of MAROON-X: Constraining Elemental Abundances of Metals and Insights on Atmosphere Dynamics

    astro-ph.EP 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    New MAROON-X observations of HAT-P-70b detect multiple neutral and ionized metals with day-to-night wind signatures and demonstrate that ionization-aware retrievals yield abundance ratios closer to solar values except...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    InHandbook of X-ray and Gamma- ray Astrophysics; Bambi, C.; Santangelo, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2024; pp

    Mushtukov, A.; Tsygankov, S., Accreting strongly magnetised neutron stars: X-ray pulsars. InHandbook of X-ray and Gamma- ray Astrophysics; Bambi, C.; Santangelo, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2024; pp. 4105–4136, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2204.14185]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7

  2. [2]

    A Comprehensive Library of X-ray Pulsars in the Small Magellanic Cloud: Time Evolution of their Luminosities and Spin Periods

    Yang, J.; Laycock, S.G.T.; Christodoulou, D.M.; Fingerman, S.; Coe, M.J.; Drake, J.J. A comprehensive library of X-ray pulsars in the Small Magellanic Cloud: Time evolution of their luminosities and spin periods.Astrophys. J.2017,839, 119, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1703.05196]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6898

  3. [3]

    An ultraluminous X-ray source powered by an accreting neutron star.Nature2014,514, 202–204, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1410.3590]

    Bachetti, M.; Harrison, F.A.; Walton, D.J.; Grefenstette, B.W.; Chakrabarty, D.; Fürst, F.; Barret, D.; Beloborodov, A.; Boggs, S.E.; Christensen, F.E.; et al. An ultraluminous X-ray source powered by an accreting neutron star.Nature2014,514, 202–204, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1410.3590]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13791

  4. [4]

    An accreting pulsar with extreme properties drives an ultraluminous X-ray source in NGC 5907.Science2017,355, 817–819, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1609.07375]

    Israel, G.L.; Belfiore, A.; Stella, L.; Esposito, P .; Casella, P .; De Luca, A.; Marelli, M.; Papitto, A.; Perri, M.; Puccetti, S.; et al. An accreting pulsar with extreme properties drives an ultraluminous X-ray source in NGC 5907.Science2017,355, 817–819, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1609.07375]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8635

  5. [5]

    ULXs: Neutron Stars vs Black Holes

    King, A.; Lasota, J.P . ULXs: Neutron stars versus black holes.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2016,458, L10–L13, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1601.03738]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slw011

  6. [6]

    Pulsing ULXs: tip of the iceberg?

    King, A.; Lasota, J.P .; Klu´ zniak, W. Pulsing ULXs: tip of the iceberg?Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2017,468, L59–L62, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1702.00808]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slx020

  7. [7]

    Ultraluminous X-ray sources are beamed

    Lasota, J.P .; King, A. Ultraluminous X-ray sources are beamed.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2023,526, 2506–2509, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2309.00034]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2926

  8. [8]

    Bright X-ray Pulsars: how outflows influence beaming, pulsations and pulse phase lags

    Mushtukov, A.A.; Portegies Zwart, S. Bright X-ray pulsars: how outflows influence beaming, pulsations and pulse phase lags. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2023,518, 5457–5464, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2211.08952]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3431

  9. [9]

    Stable accretion from a cold disc in highly magnetized neutron stars

    Tsygankov, S.S.; Mushtukov, A.A.; Suleimanov, V .F.; Doroshenko, V .; Abolmasov, P .K.; Lutovinov, A.A.; Poutanen, J. Stable accretion from a cold disc in highly magnetized neutron stars.Astron. Astrophys.2017,608, A17, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1703.04528]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201630248

  10. [10]

    Study of the X-ray pulsar IGR J19294+1816 with NuSTAR: detection of cyclotron line and transition to accretion from the cold disc

    Tsygankov, S.S.; Doroshenko, V .; Mushtukov, A.A.; Lutovinov, A.A.; Poutanen, J. Study of the X-ray pulsar IGR J19294+1816 with NuSTAR: Detection of cyclotron line and transition to accretion from the cold disk.Astron. Astrophys.2019,621, A134, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1811.08912]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833786

  11. [11]

    Why the Number of Galactic X-ray Stars Is so Small?Astron

    Illarionov, A.F.; Sunyaev, R.A. Why the Number of Galactic X-ray Stars Is so Small?Astron. Astrophys.1975,39, 185

  12. [12]

    Cyclotron lines in highly magnetized neutron stars.Astron

    Staubert, R.; Trümper, J.; Kendziorra, E.; Klochkov, D.; Postnov, K.; Kretschmar, P .; Pottschmidt, K.; Haberl, F.; Rothschild, R.E.; Santangelo, A.; et al. Cyclotron lines in highly magnetized neutron stars.Astron. Astrophys.2019,622, A61, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1812.03461]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834479

  13. [13]

    The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch.J

    Weisskopf, M.C.; Soffitta, P .; Baldini, L.; Ramsey, B.D.; O’Dell, S.L.; Romani, R.W.; Matt, G.; Deininger, W.D.; Baumgartner, W.H.; Bellazzini, R.; et al. The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch.J. Astron. Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 2022,8, 026002, [arXiv:astro-ph.IM/2112.01269]. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.8.2.026002

  14. [14]

    Remembering Yury N

    Heyl, J. Remembering Yury N. Gnedin at the dawn of X-ray polarimetry: Predictions of IXPE observations of neutron stars. Universe2022,8, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8020084

  15. [15]

    Determination of X-ray pulsar geometry with IXPE polarimetry.Nature Astronomy2022,6, 1433–1443, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2206.07138]

    Doroshenko, V .; Poutanen, J.; Tsygankov, S.S.; Suleimanov, V .F.; Bachetti, M.; Caiazzo, I.; Costa, E.; Di Marco, A.; Heyl, J.; La Monaca, F.; et al. Determination of X-ray pulsar geometry with IXPE polarimetry.Nature Astronomy2022,6, 1433–1443, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2206.07138]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01799-5

  16. [16]

    Maximum Accretion Efficiency in General Theory of Relativity.arXiv e-prints1998, [astro-ph/9811402]

    Mitra, A. Maximum Accretion Efficiency in General Theory of Relativity.arXiv e-prints1998, [astro-ph/9811402]. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9811402

  17. [17]

    Nuclear physics of the outer layers of accreting neutron stars.J

    Meisel, Z.; Deibel, A.; Keek, L.; Shternin, P .; Elfritz, J. Nuclear physics of the outer layers of accreting neutron stars.J. Phys. G: Nuclear Physics2018,45, 093001, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1807.01150]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aad171

  18. [18]

    Accretion at a magnetic pole of a neutron star.Nature Physical Science1973,246, 1–4

    Davidson, K. Accretion at a magnetic pole of a neutron star.Nature Physical Science1973,246, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/ physci246001a0

  19. [19]

    The limiting luminosity of accreting neutron stars with magnetic fields.Mon

    Basko, M.M.; Sunyaev, R.A. The limiting luminosity of accreting neutron stars with magnetic fields.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1976,175, 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/175.2.395

  20. [20]

    X-Ray Emission Accompanying the Accretion of Gas by a Neutron Star.Sov

    Zel’dovich, Y.B.; Shakura, N.I. X-Ray Emission Accompanying the Accretion of Gas by a Neutron Star.Sov. Astron.1969,13, 175

  21. [21]

    X-ray emission from magnetized neutron star atmospheres at low mass accretion rates. I. Phase-averaged spectrum

    Sokolova-Lapa, E.; Gornostaev, M.; Wilms, J.; Ballhausen, R.; Falkner, S.; Postnov, K.; Thalhammer, P .; Fürst, F.; García, J.A.; Shakura, N.; et al. X-ray emission from magnetized neutron star atmospheres at low mass-accretion rates. I. Phase-averaged spectrum.Astron. Astrophys.2021,651, A12, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2104.06802]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6...

  22. [22]

    Accretion onto neutron stars under adiabatic shock conditions.Astrophys

    Shapiro, S.L.; Salpeter, E.E. Accretion onto neutron stars under adiabatic shock conditions.Astrophys. J.1975,198, 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1086/153645

  23. [23]

    Low-luminosity accretion onto magnetized neutron stars.Astrophys

    Langer, S.H.; Rappaport, S. Low-luminosity accretion onto magnetized neutron stars.Astrophys. J.1982,257, 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1086/160028. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles1010000 Version April 2, 2026 submitted toParticles 16 of 17

  24. [24]

    Dynamics of the flows accreting onto a magnetized neutron star.Astronomy Letters2004, 30, 309–318, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0412319]

    Bykov, A.M.; Krassilchtchikov, A.M. Dynamics of the flows accreting onto a magnetized neutron star.Astronomy Letters2004, 30, 309–318, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0412319]. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1738153

  25. [25]

    Markozov, I.D.; Kaminker, A.D.; Potekhin, A.Y. Hydrodynamical simulation of the structure of the X-ray pulsar accretion channel: Accounting for resonant scattering.Astronomy Letters2023,49, 583–590, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2311.17488]. https: //doi.org/10.1134/S1063773723100031

  26. [26]

    The influence of vacuum polarization on plasma braking and radiation transfer in subcritical X-ray pulsars.Mon

    Markozov, I.D.; Potekhin, A.Y.; Kaminker, A.D.; Mushtukov, A.A. The influence of vacuum polarization on plasma braking and radiation transfer in subcritical X-ray pulsars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., to be submitted

  27. [27]

    Ginzburg, V .L.The Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves in Plasmas, 2nd ed.; Freeman and Co.: New York, 1970

  28. [28]

    The transfer equations for normal waves and radiation polarization in an anisotropic medium.Sov

    Gnedin, Y.N.; Pavlov, G.G. The transfer equations for normal waves and radiation polarization in an anisotropic medium.Sov. Phys. – JETP1974,38, 903–908

  29. [29]

    The effect of vacuum birefringence on the polarization of X-ray binaries and pulsars.Astrophys

    Novick, R.; Weisskopf, M.C.; Angel, J.R.P .; Sutherland, P .G. The effect of vacuum birefringence on the polarization of X-ray binaries and pulsars.Astrophys. J.1977,215, L117–L120. https://doi.org/10.1086/182492

  30. [30]

    The effect of vacuum birefringence in a magnetic field on the polarization and beaming of X-ray pulsars.Soviet Astronomy Letters1978,4, 117–119

    Gnedin, Y.N.; Pavlov, G.G.; Shibanov, Y.A. The effect of vacuum birefringence in a magnetic field on the polarization and beaming of X-ray pulsars.Soviet Astronomy Letters1978,4, 117–119

  31. [31]

    Vacuum polarization by a magnetic field and its astrophysical manifestations.Sov

    Pavlov, G.G.; Gnedin, Y.N. Vacuum polarization by a magnetic field and its astrophysical manifestations.Sov. Sci. Rev. E: Astrophys. Space Phys. Rev.1984,3, 197

  32. [32]

    Resonant Conversion of Photon Modes Due to Vacuum Polarization in a Magnetized Plasma: Implications for X-Ray Emission from Magnetars.Astrophys

    Lai, D.; Ho, W.C.G. Resonant Conversion of Photon Modes Due to Vacuum Polarization in a Magnetized Plasma: Implications for X-Ray Emission from Magnetars.Astrophys. J.2002,566, 373–377, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0108127]. https://doi.org/10.108 6/338074

  33. [33]

    Atmospheres and spectra of strongly magnetized neutron stars - II

    Ho, W.C.G.; Lai, D. Atmospheres and spectra of strongly magnetized neutron stars - II. The effect of vacuum polarization.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2003,338, 233–252, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0201380]. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06047.x

  34. [34]

    Transfer of Polarized Radiation in Strongly Magnetized Plasmas and Thermal Emission from Magnetars: Effect of Vacuum Polarization.Astrophys

    Lai, D.; Ho, W.C.G. Transfer of Polarized Radiation in Strongly Magnetized Plasmas and Thermal Emission from Magnetars: Effect of Vacuum Polarization.Astrophys. J.2003,588, 962–974, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0211315]. https://doi.org/10.1086/374334

  35. [35]

    Atmosphere models of magnetized neutron stars: QED effects, radiation spectra and polarization signals.Mon

    van Adelsberg, M.; Lai, D. Atmosphere models of magnetized neutron stars: QED effects, radiation spectra and polarization signals.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2006,373, 1495–1522, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0607168]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2006.11098.x

  36. [36]

    Statistical features of multiple Compton scattering in a strong magnetic field

    Mushtukov, A.A.; Markozov, I.D.; Suleimanov, V .F.; Nagirner, D.I.; Kaminker, A.D.; Potekhin, A.Y.; Portegies Zwart, S. Statistical features of multiple Compton scattering in a strong magnetic field.Phys. Rev. D2022,105, 103027, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2204.12271]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103027

  37. [37]

    Mészáros, P .High-Energy Radiation from Magnetized Neutron Stars; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1992

  38. [38]

    Compton and Thomson scattering in strong magnetic fields.Phys

    Herold, H. Compton and Thomson scattering in strong magnetic fields.Phys. Rev. D1979,19, 2868–2875. https://doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevD.19.2868

  39. [39]

    LeVeque, R.J.Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems; Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002

  40. [40]

    The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas-Dynamical Simulations.J

    Colella, P .; Woodward, P .R. The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas-Dynamical Simulations.J. Computational Phys.1984, 54, 174–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(84)90143-8

  41. [41]

    The thickness of accretionα-disks: Theory and observations.Astronomy Reports 2007,51, 549–562

    Suleimanov, V .F.; Lipunova, G.V .; Shakura, N.I. The thickness of accretionα-disks: Theory and observations.Astronomy Reports 2007,51, 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772907070049

  42. [42]

    Spectrum formation in X-ray pulsars at very low mass accretion rate: Monte-Carlo approach

    Mushtukov, A.A.; Suleimanov, V .F.; Tsygankov, S.S.; Portegies Zwart, S. Spectrum formation in X-ray pulsars at very low mass accretion rate: Monte Carlo approach.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2021,503, 5193–5203, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2006.13596]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab811

  43. [43]

    Vacuum polarization alters the spectra of accreting X-ray pulsars

    Sokolova-Lapa, E.; Stierhof, J.; Dauser, T.; Wilms, J. Vacuum polarization alters the spectra of accreting X-ray pulsars.Astron. Astrophys.2023,674, L2, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2305.00475]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346265

  44. [44]

    Rotating stars in relativity.Living Reviews in Relativity2003,6, 3, [arXiv:gr-qc/gr-qc/0302034]

    Stergioulas, N. Rotating stars in relativity.Living Reviews in Relativity2003,6, 3, [arXiv:gr-qc/gr-qc/0302034]. https://doi.org/10 .12942/lrr-2003-3

  45. [45]

    Pulse profiles of millisecond pulsars and their Fourier amplitudes.Mon

    Poutanen, J.; Beloborodov, A.M. Pulse profiles of millisecond pulsars and their Fourier amplitudes.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2006,373, 836–844, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0608663]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11088.x

  46. [46]

    Relativistic rotating vector model for X-ray millisecond pulsars

    Poutanen, J. Relativistic rotating vector model for X-ray millisecond pulsars.Astron. Astrophys.2020,641, A166, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2006.10448]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038689

  47. [47]

    Accurate analytic formula for light bending in Schwarzschild metric.Astron

    Poutanen, J. Accurate analytic formula for light bending in Schwarzschild metric.Astron. Astrophys.2020,640, A24, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1909.05732]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037471

  48. [48]

    Misner, C.W.; Thorne, K.S.; Wheeler, J.A.Gravitation; Freeman and Co.: New York, 1973

  49. [49]

    Timing Characteristics of the Hard X-ray Emission from Bright X-ray Pulsars Based on INTEGRAL Data

    Lutovinov, A.A.; Tsygankov, S.S. Timing characteristics of the hard X-ray emission from bright X-ray pulsars based on INTEGRAL data.Astronomy Letters2009,35, 433–456, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/0907.4288]. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773709070019. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles1010000 Version April 2, 2026 submitted toParticles 17 of 17

  50. [50]

    Energy-resolved pulse profiles of accreting pulsars: Diagnostic tools for spectral features

    Ferrigno, C.; D’Aì, A.; Ambrosi, E. Energy-resolved pulse profiles of accreting pulsars: Diagnostic tools for spectral features. Astron. Astrophys.2023,677, A103, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2308.03395]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347062. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles1010000