arxiv: 2604.02635 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 🪐 quant-ph

From Liouville equation to universal quantum control: A study of generating ultra highly squeezed states

Zhu-yao Jin , J. Q. You , Jun Jing This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords Liouville equationquantum controlsqueezed statesnonadiabatic passagessymplectic transformationHeisenberg equationnon-Hermitian systemscontinuous-variable systems

0 comments

The pith

Second quantization of the Liouville equation supplies a Heisenberg equation sufficient for nonadiabatic control to arbitrary quantum states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper links classical continuous-variable dynamics to quantum control through ancillary representations defined on differential manifolds. A symplectic transformation produces time-dependent ancillary canonical variables that remain invariants when the Hamilton-Jacobi equation holds, guiding the system across phase space without adiabatic restrictions. Second quantization converts the Liouville equation on these variables into a Heisenberg equation for the corresponding operators; this equation alone is shown to be enough for exact, nonadiabatic evolution toward any chosen target state in both Hermitian and non-Hermitian settings. The same construction yields constrained exact solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The method is demonstrated by producing single-mode squeezed states at 29.3 dB and two-mode squeezed states at 20.5 dB.

Core claim

The second quantization of the Liouville equation for the canonical variables leads to the Heisenberg equation for the relevant ancillary operators, which is found to be a sufficient condition to yield nonadiabatic passages towards arbitrary target states in both Hermitian and non-Hermitian systems and constrained exact solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.

What carries the argument

Ancillary canonical variables obtained from a symplectic transformation on the original variables; these act as dynamical invariants under the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, and their second-quantized operators obey a Heisenberg equation derived directly from the Liouville equation.

If this is right

Nonadiabatic passages exist to any chosen target state in continuous-variable Hermitian and non-Hermitian quantum systems.
Exact, constrained solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation follow directly from the ancillary-operator equation.
Single-mode squeezed states can be generated with squeezing levels of 29.3 dB.
Two-mode squeezed states can be generated with squeezing levels of 20.5 dB.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same ancillary-operator construction may supply control protocols for other continuous-variable tasks such as state transfer or entanglement distribution.
Because the method originates in classical phase-space geometry, it offers a route to design quantum control sequences without explicit diagonalization of the full Hamiltonian.
Open-system extensions using the Lindblad-derived non-Hermitian Hamiltonians could be tested in circuit-QED or optomechanical platforms to reach the reported squeezing values.

Load-bearing premise

The ancillary canonical variables produced by the symplectic transformation function as dynamical invariants that steer the system through the full phase space whenever the Hamilton-Jacobi equation is satisfied.

What would settle it

A numerical integration or laboratory run in which the ancillary-operator Heisenberg dynamics fails to reach the prescribed target squeezed states or to reproduce the exact time-dependent Schrödinger solutions would disprove the claimed sufficiency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.02635 by J. Q. You, Jun Jing, Zhu-yao Jin.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dynamics of (a) the fidelity with respect to the tar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Within a unified framework, we reveal that the seemingly disparate control approaches for classical and quantum continuous-variable systems are interconnected via differential manifolds of the ancillary representations. For classical systems, the ancillary representation is defined by the time-dependent ancillary canonical variables resulting from a symplectic transformation over the original canonical variables. Under the conditions of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, the ancillary canonical variables act as dynamical invariants to guide the system nonadiabatically through the entire phase space. The second quantization of the Liouville equation for the canonical variables leads to the Heisenberg equation for the relevant ancillary operators, which is found to be a sufficient condition to yield nonadiabatic passages towards arbitrary target states in both Hermitian and non-Hermitian systems and constrained exact solutions of the time-dependent Schroedinger equation. Using the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian rigorously derived from the Lindblad master equation, our theory is exemplified by the generation of single-mode squeezed states with a squeezing level of 29.3 dB and double-mode squeezed states with 20.5 dB, respectively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper links classical Liouville dynamics to quantum control via ancillary symplectic variables and reports high squeezing levels, but the step that turns the quantized Liouville into a sufficient invariant Heisenberg condition for arbitrary nonadiabatic targets has a gap that needs checking.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work sketches a route from the classical Liouville equation through symplectic transformations and Hamilton-Jacobi invariants to a quantum version that supposedly lets you steer to arbitrary states nonadiabatically, including the 29.3 dB single-mode and 20.5 dB two-mode squeezing they calculate from a Lindblad-derived non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. The concrete squeezing numbers are the part that would matter most to people who actually build these states. What looks new is the organizing picture that treats the ancillary canonical variables as living on differential manifolds and then second-quantizes the whole setup to get a Heisenberg equation for those operators. That framing is not the usual adiabatic or shortcut-to-adiabaticity story, so it could be useful as a different way to think about fast control in continuous-variable systems. The classical side is laid out cleanly enough, and the move to open systems via the Lindblad master equation is a reasonable step. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points: second-quantizing the Liouville equation produces the von Neumann equation for the density operator, but it is not automatic that the transformed ancillary operators remain dynamical invariants when the underlying map is time-dependent and the Hamiltonian is non-Hermitian. If those operators pick up extra terms along the trajectory, the claimed sufficiency for exact solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation does not follow without extra work. The abstract states the conclusion but does not show the intermediate commutators or verify invariance, so the central derivation is the part that needs the closest look. This is for people working on squeezed-state generation and continuous-variable control who want a nonadiabatic alternative; a reader already comfortable with symplectic maps and open-system Hamiltonians will get the most out of it. I would send it to referees rather than desk-reject, because the framework is coherent on its face and the squeezing targets are practically relevant, but the review should focus on whether the invariance actually survives the quantization step.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims a unified framework connecting classical and quantum continuous-variable control via differential manifolds of ancillary representations. Starting from the Liouville equation, a symplectic transformation defines time-dependent ancillary canonical variables that act as dynamical invariants under the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, guiding nonadiabatic passages through phase space. Second quantization of the Liouville equation is asserted to produce the Heisenberg equation for the corresponding ancillary operators, which suffices for nonadiabatic steering to arbitrary target states (including constrained exact solutions of the TDSE) in both Hermitian and non-Hermitian systems. The framework is exemplified by generating single-mode squeezed states at 29.3 dB and two-mode squeezed states at 20.5 dB using a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian rigorously derived from the Lindblad master equation.

Significance. If the central derivation holds without hidden assumptions, the work would offer a novel invariant-based route to universal quantum control that unifies classical symplectic methods with quantum dynamics, potentially enabling exact nonadiabatic protocols and ultra-high squeezing levels in continuous-variable systems. The explicit use of Lindblad-derived non-Hermitian Hamiltonians and the reported concrete dB values would strengthen its relevance to quantum optics and CV quantum information processing.

major comments (3)

[Abstract (derivation paragraph) and main theoretical development] The transition from the classical Liouville equation to the Heisenberg equation for ancillary operators via second quantization is load-bearing for the sufficiency claim but is not explicitly derived. Standard quantization maps the Liouville equation to the von Neumann equation for the density operator; it is unclear how the Poisson-bracket structure for a time-dependent symplectic map preserves dynamical invariance of the ancillary operators as commutators when the underlying Hamiltonian is explicitly time-dependent and non-Hermitian. This directly affects the assertion that the resulting equation yields constrained exact solutions of the TDSE.
[Abstract and the section presenting the Hamilton-Jacobi condition] The weakest assumption—that ancillary canonical variables remain dynamical invariants under the Hamilton-Jacobi condition for time-dependent symplectic transformations—is asserted but not proven in the quantum case. For non-Hermitian dynamics derived from Lindblad, the invariance must be shown to survive the quantization step; without this, the nonadiabatic passage to arbitrary targets (including the reported 29.3 dB and 20.5 dB squeezing) lacks a rigorous foundation.
[Exemplification section reporting the dB values] The concrete squeezing values (29.3 dB single-mode, 20.5 dB two-mode) are stated in the abstract without accompanying error analysis, explicit verification that they satisfy the ancillary-operator Heisenberg equation, or demonstration that they arise parameter-free from the theory rather than from numerical fitting. This undermines the claim of sufficiency for ultra-high squeezing.

minor comments (2)

[Classical setup section] Define the ancillary canonical variables and the explicit form of the symplectic transformation more clearly before quantization, including how they relate to the original phase-space coordinates.
[Discussion or conclusion] Add a brief comparison of the reported squeezing levels to existing experimental records and theoretical limits in the literature to contextualize the advance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments identify places where the derivations and numerical results require more explicit support. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the necessary expansions and verifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract (derivation paragraph) and main theoretical development] The transition from the classical Liouville equation to the Heisenberg equation for ancillary operators via second quantization is load-bearing for the sufficiency claim but is not explicitly derived. Standard quantization maps the Liouville equation to the von Neumann equation for the density operator; it is unclear how the Poisson-bracket structure for a time-dependent symplectic map preserves dynamical invariance of the ancillary operators as commutators when the underlying Hamiltonian is explicitly time-dependent and non-Hermitian. This directly affects the assertion that the resulting equation yields constrained exact solutions of the TDSE.

Authors: We agree that the second-quantization step must be derived explicitly, especially for time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection that maps the classical Poisson-bracket structure of the time-dependent symplectic transformation onto the corresponding commutators, showing that the ancillary operators remain dynamical invariants and that the resulting Heisenberg equation is sufficient for constrained exact solutions of the TDSE. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract and the section presenting the Hamilton-Jacobi condition] The weakest assumption—that ancillary canonical variables remain dynamical invariants under the Hamilton-Jacobi condition for time-dependent symplectic transformations—is asserted but not proven in the quantum case. For non-Hermitian dynamics derived from Lindblad, the invariance must be shown to survive the quantization step; without this, the nonadiabatic passage to arbitrary targets (including the reported 29.3 dB and 20.5 dB squeezing) lacks a rigorous foundation.

Authors: We accept that the survival of dynamical invariance after quantization must be proven for the Lindblad-derived non-Hermitian case. The revised version will contain a new proof subsection demonstrating that the Hamilton-Jacobi invariance condition is preserved under the quantization map, thereby placing the nonadiabatic passages to arbitrary targets on a rigorous footing. revision: yes
Referee: [Exemplification section reporting the dB values] The concrete squeezing values (29.3 dB single-mode, 20.5 dB two-mode) are stated in the abstract without accompanying error analysis, explicit verification that they satisfy the ancillary-operator Heisenberg equation, or demonstration that they arise parameter-free from the theory rather than from numerical fitting. This undermines the claim of sufficiency for ultra-high squeezing.

Authors: The quoted squeezing levels are obtained by direct numerical integration of the ancillary-operator Heisenberg equation for the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian derived from the Lindblad master equation. In the revision we will add (i) a quantitative error analysis, (ii) explicit verification that the computed trajectories satisfy the Heisenberg equation to machine precision, and (iii) a parameter table showing that all values follow directly from the theoretical construction without additional fitting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain from Liouville equation via symplectic transformation to Heisenberg equation for ancillary operators is self-contained and does not reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper begins with the standard Liouville equation on phase-space density and a time-dependent symplectic transformation to define ancillary canonical variables. Under the Hamilton-Jacobi condition these variables are asserted to be dynamical invariants. The second quantization step is presented as mapping the Liouville evolution directly onto the Heisenberg equation for the corresponding operators; this mapping is used to claim sufficiency for nonadiabatic steering to arbitrary targets, including the reported squeezing levels. No equation in the provided abstract or description shows a parameter fitted to the target squeezing (29.3 dB or 20.5 dB) and then renamed as a prediction. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely via self-citation. The squeezing numbers appear as concrete outcomes of the derived control protocol rather than inputs that define the protocol. The derivation therefore remains independent of its illustrative results and does not collapse by construction to its own assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard symplectic transformation and the domain assumption that Hamilton-Jacobi conditions render ancillary variables dynamical invariants; no new entities are postulated and no free parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Ancillary canonical variables from symplectic transformation act as dynamical invariants under Hamilton-Jacobi equation conditions
Invoked to enable nonadiabatic guidance across phase space in the classical part of the framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5487 in / 1343 out tokens · 73606 ms · 2026-05-13T20:35:25.863145+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The second quantization of the Liouville equation for the canonical variables leads to the Heisenberg equation for the relevant ancillary operators

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

From Liouville equation to universal quantum control: A study of generating ultra highly squeezed states

7 dB and 20 . 5 dB for GKP-based [ 33] and cluster- state-based [ 30] FTQC, respectively. However, to our best knowledge, the highest squeezing level reaches about 15 dB for single-mode states both theoretically [ 34] and experimentally [ 35, 36]; and for two-mode squeezing, the records are about 15 dB in theory [ 37, 38] and 10 dB in experiment [39]. The...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

The ancillary canonical variables⃗ u(⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t ) and⃗ u∗ (⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t ) are explicitly time-dependent and they satisfy the relation {uj,u ∗ k}⃗ q,⃗ p= −i{uj,u ∗ k}⃗ u,⃗ u∗ = −iδjk

can be alternatively alleviated by a time-dependent canonical transformation [⃗ u(⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t ),⃗ u∗ (⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t )]T = M(t)(⃗ a,⃗ a∗ )T, (3) where M(t) is a time-dependent 2 N × 2N symplectic matrix and the superscript T denotes the transposition that converts a row vector into a column vector. The ancillary canonical variables⃗ u(⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t ) and⃗ u∗ (⃗ a...

work page
[3]

can be derived by the inverse transformation of Eq. ( 3). Repre- sentative examples for time-modulating classical single- and double-mode systems are shown in Supplementary material (SM) A. More importantly, the explicit time dependence of uk(⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t ) and u∗ k(⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t ) in Eq. (

work page
[4]

It is interesting to ﬁnd that our general theory based on Eq

leads to the Liou- ville equation (see SM B for detailed derivation) as ∂J k(⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t ) ∂t = −i {H(⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t ),J k(⃗ a,⃗ a∗,t )}⃗ a,⃗ a∗ , (6) with Jk = uk and u∗ k. It is interesting to ﬁnd that our general theory based on Eq. (

work page
[5]

suﬃces to encompass the STA protocols [ 11, 12] for classical scale-invariant systems [ 12], see SM C for details. Universal framework for quantum control.— In quan- tum mechanics, the Liouville equation ( 6) translates to the Heisenberg equation, by which one can establish a universal framework for controlling the continuous- variable systems under the t...

work page
[6]

or ( 9) is speciﬁed [ 48–51], see, e.g., Eq. ( 21). With respect to V(t), ˆH(t) in Eq. ( 10) is transformed as ˆHrot(t) = V †(t) ˆH(t)V(t) − iV †(t)∂V(t) ∂t ≡ ( ⃗ µ† 0 ⃗ µ0 ) H(t) ( ⃗ µT 0 (⃗ µ† 0)T ) , (12) where ⃗ µ0 ≡ ⃗ µ(0) = [ˆµ 1(0), ˆµ 2(0), · · ·, ˆµ N (0)]. Main results.— Upon the second quantization, i.e., the translation of the classical Hamilt...

work page
[7]

Equation (

can become the Heisen- berg equation: ∂Jk(t) ∂t = −i [ ˆH(t), Jk(t) ] , (13) where the dynamical invariants Jk(t) = ˜µ k(t) and ˜µ † k(t), k ∈ { 1, 2, · · ·,N }, are attained by a gauge transforma- tion of the ancillary operators, ˆµ k(t) ↦→ ˜µ k(t) ≡ eifk(t) ˆµ k(t), ˆµ † k(t) ↦→ ˜µ † k(t), (14) with fk(t) ≡ ∫ t 0 Hkk(s)ds the gauge-invariant global phas...

work page
[8]

(15) They also provide constrained exact solutions to the time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation (

constitutes a suﬃcient condition for demonstrating the system dynamics, under which ˆ µ k(0) and ˆµ † k(0) evolve as (see SM D1 for details) ˆµ k(0) → e− ifk(t) ˆµ k(t), ˆµ † k(0) → eifk(t) ˆµ † k(t). (15) They also provide constrained exact solutions to the time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equation (

work page
[9]

Non-Hermitian case.— The Heisenberg equation ( 13) also applies to the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, i.e., ˆH(t) ̸= ˆH †(t)

when the sys- tem is initially prepared by ˆµ k(0) or ˆµ † k(0). Non-Hermitian case.— The Heisenberg equation ( 13) also applies to the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, i.e., ˆH(t) ̸= ˆH †(t). Under the biorthogonal assumption [ 52], the system dynamics can be described by two sets of time-dependent Schr¨ odinger equations as i∂ ∂t |ψ (t)⟩ = ˆH(t)|ψ (t)⟩, i ∂ ∂...

work page
[10]

can be written as V(t) = S† 1 [ θ(t)e− iα (t) ] S1 [ θ(0)e− iα (0) ] . (21) 4 Using the Heisenberg equation ( 13) with the Hamilto- nian ( 19) and Jk(t) = ˜µ †(t), one can obtain the con- straints for the driving intensity Ω( t) and eigenfrequency ω (t) as Ω(t) = − ˙θ(t) +γ sinhθ(t) coshθ(t) 2 sin[ϕ +α (t)] , ω (t) = − { ˙α (t) + 2Ω(t) cos[ϕ +α (t)]} coth...

work page
[11]

can be simpliﬁed as [ˆ µ 1(t), ˆµ † 2(t)]T = M(t)(ˆa1, ˆa† 2)T , where M(t) takes the same form as in Eq. ( 20). The detailed derivation can be found in SM F. The full version and a brief recipe for the general ancillary operators can be found in SM G. Then V(t) also takes the same form as Eq. ( 21) under the replacement of S1 with S2. Using the Heisenber...

work page
[12]

Pioneer” and “Leading Goose

gener- ates a two-mode squeezed vacuum state |ψ tar(τ)⟩ = S2[θ(τ) exp (−iα (τ))]|ψ (0)⟩ as deﬁned in Eq. ( 25). 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 5 10 15 20 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1(a) (b) FIG. 2. Dynamics of (a) the ﬁdelity with respect to the tar- get two-mode squeezed vacuum state |ψ tar(τ)⟩ and (b) the relevant squeezing level S(t). The Hilbert-spa...

work page
[13]

V. I. Arnol’d, Mathematical methods of classical mechan- ics, Vol. 60 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

work page 2013
[14]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of theoretical physics (Elsevier, 2013)

work page 2013
[15]

Schr¨ odinger, An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules, Phys

E. Schr¨ odinger, An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules, Phys. Rev. 28, 1049 (1926)

work page 1926
[16]

F. J. Dyson, The radiation theories of tomonaga, schwinger, and feynman, Phys. Rev. 75, 486 (1949)

work page 1949
[17]

Blanes, F

S. Blanes, F. Casas, J. Oteo, and J. Ros, The magnus expansion and some of its applications, Phys. Rep. 470, 151 (2009)

work page 2009
[18]

Nakajima, Perturbation theory in statistical mechan- ics, Adv

S. Nakajima, Perturbation theory in statistical mechan- ics, Adv. Phys. 4, 363 (1955)

work page 1955
[19]

J. R. Schrieﬀer and P. A. Wolﬀ, Relation be- tween the anderson and kondo hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. 149, 491 (1966)

work page 1966
[20]

J. R. Morris and B. W. Shore, Reduction of degener- ate two-level excitation to independent two-state systems , Phys. Rev. A 27, 906 (1983)

work page 1983
[21]

D. F. James and J. Jerke, Eﬀective hamiltonian theory and its applications in quantum information, Can. J. Phys. 85, 625 (2007)

work page 2007
[22]

Ashida, Z

Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020)

work page 2020
[23]

Jarzynski, Generating shortcuts to adia- baticity in quantum and classical dynamics, Phys

C. Jarzynski, Generating shortcuts to adia- baticity in quantum and classical dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 88, 040101 (2013)

work page 2013
[24]

Deﬀner, C

S. Deﬀner, C. Jarzynski, and A. del Campo, Classical and quantum shortcuts to adiabaticity for scale-invariant driving, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021013 (2014)

work page 2014
[25]

Jarzynski, S

C. Jarzynski, S. Deﬀner, A. Patra, and Y. b. u. Suba¸ s ı,Fast forward to the classical adiabatic invariant, 6 Phys. Rev. E 95, 032122 (2017)

work page 2017
[26]

Lewis, H

J. Lewis, H. R. and W. B. Riesenfeld, An exact quantum theory of the time-dependent harmonic oscillator and of a charged particle in a time-dependent electromagnetic ﬁeld, J. Math. Phys. 10, 1458 (1969)

work page 1969
[27]

X. Chen, E. Torrontegui, and J. G. Muga, Lewis- riesenfeld invariants and transitionless quantum driving , Phys. Rev. A 83, 062116 (2011)

work page 2011
[28]

Gao, J.-B

X.-C. Gao, J.-B. Xu, and T.-Z. Qian, Invariants and geometric phase for systems with non-hermitian time- dependent hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A 46, 3626 (1992)

work page 1992
[29]

Ib´ a˜ nez, S

S. Ib´ a˜ nez, S. Mart ´ ınez-Garaot, X. Chen, E. Torrontegui, and J. G. Muga, Shortcuts to adiabaticity for non- hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. A 84, 023415 (2011)

work page 2011
[30]

D.-W. Luo, P. V. Pyshkin, C.-H. Lam, T. Yu, H.- Q. Lin, J. Q. You, and L.-A. Wu, Dynamical invari- ants in a non-markovian quantum-state-diﬀusion equa- tion, Phys. Rev. A 92, 062127 (2015)

work page 2015
[31]

C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, H. F. Jones, and B. K. Meister, Faster than hermitian quantum mechan- ics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 040403 (2007)

work page 2007
[32]

Peˇ rina, A

J. Peˇ rina, A. Lukˇ s, J. K. Kalaga, W. Leo´ nski, and A. Miranowicz, Nonclassical light at exceptional points of a quantum PT -symmetric two-mode system, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053820 (2019)

work page 2019
[33]

F. U. J. Klauck, M. Heinrich, A. Szameit, and T. A. W. Wolterink, Crossing exceptional points in non-hermitian quantum systems, Sci. Adv. 11, eadr8275 (2025)

work page 2025
[34]

Metelmann and A

A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and ampliﬁcation via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

work page 2015
[35]

H. Liu, X. Yang, K. Tang, L. Che, X. Nie, T. Xin, J. Li, and D. Lu, Practical quan- tum simulation of small-scale non-hermitian dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062608 (2023)

work page 2023
[36]

Zhang, Y

X.-M. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. He, and X. Yuan, Expo- nential quantum advantages for practical non-hermitian eigenproblems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 140601 (2025)

work page 2025
[37]

Y.-H. Chen, W. Qin, X. Wang, A. Miranow- icz, and F. Nori, Shortcuts to adiabaticity for the quantum rabi model: Eﬃcient generation of gi- ant entangled cat states via parametric ampliﬁcation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 023602 (2021)

work page 2021
[38]

Schnabel, Squeezed states of light and their applica- tions in laser interferometers, Phys

R. Schnabel, Squeezed states of light and their applica- tions in laser interferometers, Phys. Rep. 684, 1 (2017)

work page 2017
[39]

S. L. Braunstein and H. J. Kimble, Tele- portation of continuous quantum variables, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 869 (1998)

work page 1998
[41]

S. L. Braunstein and H. J. Kimble, Dense coding for con- tinuous variables, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042302 (2000)

work page 2000
[42]

N. C. Menicucci, Fault-tolerant measurement-based quan- tum computing with continuous-variable cluster states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120504 (2014)

work page 2014
[43]

Fl¨ uhmann, T

C. Fl¨ uhmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V. Neg- nevitsky, K. Mehta, and J. P. Home, Encod- ing a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator, Nature 566, 513 (2019)

work page 2019
[44]

He and S

M. He and S. Liu, Performance optimization of continuous-variable quantum teleportation with gen- eralized photon-varying non-gaussian operations, Phys. Rev. A 110, 012425 (2024)

work page 2024
[45]

M. V. Larsen, C. Chamberland, K. Noh, J. S. Neergaard- Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Fault-tolerant continuous- variable measurement-based quantum computation archi- tecture, PRX Quantum 2, 030325 (2021)

work page 2021
[46]

Korobko, J

M. Korobko, J. S¨ udbeck, S. Steinlechner, and R. Schn- abel, Fundamental sensitivity limit of lossy cavity- enhanced interferometers with external and internal squeezing, Phys. Rev. A 108, 063705 (2023)

work page 2023
[47]

Vahlbruch, M

H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Detection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum eﬃciency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110801 (2016)

work page 2016
[48]

Y. Cai, X. Deng, L. Zhang, Z. Ni, J. Mai, P. Huang, P. Zheng, L. Hu, S. Liu, Y. Xu, and D. Yu, Quantum squeezing ampliﬁcation with a weak kerr nonlinear oscil- lator, Nat. Commun. 17, 970 (2025)

work page 2025
[49]

R. T. Sutherland and R. Srinivas, Univer- sal hybrid quantum computing in trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A 104, 032609 (2021)

work page 2021
[50]

F. R. Cardoso, D. Z. Rossatto, G. P. L. M. Fernandes, G. Higgins, and C. J. Villas-Boas, Superposition of two- mode squeezed states for quantum information processing and quantum sensing, Phys. Rev. A 103, 062405 (2021)

work page 2021
[51]

Eberle, V

T. Eberle, V. H¨ andchen, and R. Schnabel, Stable con- trol of 10 db two-mode squeezed vacuum states of light, Opt. Express 21, 11546 (2013)

work page 2013
[52]

Miˇ cuda, I

M. Miˇ cuda, I. Straka, M. Mikov´ a, M. Duˇ sek, N. J. Cerf, J. Fiur´ aˇ sek, and M. Jeˇ zek, Noiseless loss suppression in quantum optical communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 180503 (2012)

work page 2012
[53]

P. A. M. Dirac, The fundamental equations of quantum mechanics, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 109, 642 (1925)

work page 1925
[54]

Y.-P. Wang, J. W. Rao, Y. Yang, P.-C. Xu, Y. S. Gui, B. M. Yao, J. Q. You, and C.-M. Hu, Nonreciproc- ity and unidirectional invisibility in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 127202 (2019)

work page 2019
[55]

Strocchi, Complex coordinates and quantum mechan- ics, Rev

F. Strocchi, Complex coordinates and quantum mechan- ics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 36 (1966)

work page 1966
[56]

Corona, K

M. Corona, K. Garay-Palmett, and A. B. U’Ren, Exper- imental proposal for the generation of entangled photon triplets by third-order spontaneous parametric downcon- version in optical ﬁbers, Opt. Lett. 36, 190 (2011)

work page 2011
[57]

N. A. Borshchevskaya, K. G. Katamadze, S. P. Kulik, and M. V. Fedorov, Three-photon generation by means of third-order spontaneous parametric down-conversion in bulk crystals, Laser Phys. Lett. 12, 115404 (2015)

work page 2015
[58]

Akbari and A

M. Akbari and A. A. Kalachev, Third-order sponta- neous parametric down-conversion in a ring microcavity, Laser Phys. Lett. 13, 115204 (2016)

work page 2016
[59]

C. W. S. Chang, C. Sab ´ ın, P. Forn-D ´ ıaz, F. Quijandr ´ ıa, A. M. Vadiraj, I. Nsanzineza, G. Johansson, and C. M. Wilson, Observation of three-photon spontaneous para- metric down-conversion in a superconducting parametric cavity, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011011 (2020)

work page 2020
[60]

Jin and J

Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Universal per- spective on nonadiabatic quantum control, Phys. Rev. A 111, 012406 (2025)

work page 2025
[61]

Jin and J

Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Entangling distant systems via universal nonadiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022628 (2025)

work page 2025
[62]

Jin and J

Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Universal quan- tum control by non-hermitian hamiltonian, 7 Phys. Rev. A 112, 032605 (2025)

work page 2025
[63]

Jin and J

Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Universal quantum control over bosonic networks, Phys. Rev. A 113, 012426 (2026)

work page 2026
[64]

D. C. Brody, Biorthogonal quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A:Math. Theor. 47, 035305 (2013)

work page 2013
[65]

H. P. Yuen, Two-photon coherent states of the radiation ﬁeld, Phys. Rev. A 13, 2226 (1976)

work page 1976
[66]

Fabre and N

C. Fabre and N. Treps, Modes and states in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 035005 (2020)

work page 2020
[67]

A. M. Eriksson, T. S´ epulcre, M. Kervinen, T. Hillmann, M. Kudra, S. Dupouy, Y. Lu, M. Khanahmadi, J. Yang, C. Castillo-Moreno, P. Delsing, and S. Gasparinetti, Uni- versal control of a bosonic mode via drive-activated native cubic interactions, Nat. Commun. 15, 2512 (2024)

work page 2024
[68]

Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 1999)

H. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, 1999)

work page 1999
[69]

Quijandr ´ ıa, U

F. Quijandr ´ ıa, U. Naether, S. K. ¨Ozdemir, F. Nori, and D. Zueco, PT -symmetric circuit qed, Phys. Rev. A 97, 053846 (2018)

work page 2018
[70]

Purkayastha, M

A. Purkayastha, M. Kulkarni, and Y. N. Joglekar, Emer- gent PT symmetry in a double-quantum-dot circuit qed setup, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043075 (2020)

work page 2020
[71]

Y.-Y. Liu, K. D. Petersson, J. Stehlik, J. M. Taylor, and J. R. Petta, Photon emission from a cavity-coupled double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 036801 (2014)

work page 2014
[72]

Y.-Y. Liu, J. Stehlik, C. Eichler, M. J. Gullans, J. M. Taylor, and J. R. Petta, Semiconductor double quantum dot micromaser, Science 347, 285 (2015)

work page 2015
[73]

Stehlik, Y.-Y

J. Stehlik, Y.-Y. Liu, C. Eichler, T. R. Hartke, X. Mi, M. J. Gullans, J. M. Taylor, and J. R. Petta, Double quantum dot ﬂoquet gain medium, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041027 (2016)

work page 2016
[74]

N. E. Frattini, R. G. Corti˜ nas, J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao , Q. Su, C. U. Lei, B. J. Chapman, V. R. Joshi, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. Puri, and M. H. Devoret, Ob- servation of pairwise level degeneracies and the quantum regime of the arrhenius law in a double-well parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031040 (2024)

work page 2024
[75]

A. Hajr, B. Qing, K. Wang, G. Koolstra, Z. Pedram- razi, Z. Kang, L. Chen, L. B. Nguyen, C. J¨ unger, N. Goss, I. Huang, B. Bhandari, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, J. Dressel, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Sid- diqi, High-coherence kerr-cat qubit in 2d architecture, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041049 (2024)

work page 2024
[76]

Beaulieu, F

G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, V. Savona, S. Felicetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Ob- servation of ﬁrst- and second-order dissipative phase transitions in a two-photon driven kerr resonator, Nat. Commun. 16, 1954 (2025)

work page 1954
[77]

Mamaev, M

M. Mamaev, M. Koppenh¨ ofer, A. Pocklington, and A. A. Clerk, Non-gaussian generalized two-mode squeez- ing: Applications to two-ensemble spin squeezing and be- yond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 073603 (2025)

work page 2025
[78]

Zhang, X.-Q

D. Zhang, X.-Q. Luo, Y.-P. Wang, T.-F. Li, and J. Q. You, Observation of the exceptional point in cav- ity magnon-polaritons, Nat. Commun. 8, 1368 (2017)

work page 2017
[79]

Zhang, M

C. Zhang, M. Kim, Y.-H. Zhang, Y.-P. Wang, D. Trivedi, A. Krasnok, J. Wang, D. Isleifson, R. Roshko, and C.-M. Hu, Gain–loss coupled systems, APL Quantum 2, 011501 (2025)

work page 2025
[80]

K. H. Yeon, K. K. Lee, C. I. Um, T. F. George, and L. N. Pandey, Exact quantum theory of a time-dependent bound quadratic hamiltonian system, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2716 (1993)

work page 1993
[81]

Harari, Y

G. Harari, Y. Ben-Aryeh, and A. Mann, Propagator for the general time-dependent harmonic oscillator with ap- plication to an ion trap, Phys. Rev. A 84, 062104 (2011)

work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.