pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.03047 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-03 · ✦ hep-ph

All-heavy tetraquarks with different flavors

Wei-Xiang Wang , Lin-Qin Xie , Jun-Jie Liu , Zhi-Biao Liang , Ming-Sheng Liu , Xian-Hui Zhong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 17:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords all-heavydifferentflavorstetraquarksdecayfall-apartmassstates
0
0 comments X

The pith

The 1S states of bb bbar cbar, cc cbar bbar, bb cbar cbar, and bc bbar cbar tetraquarks are predicted to have masses in 16.06-16.14, 9.65-9.74, 12.89-12.94, and 12.75-12.99 GeV with narrow fall-apart decay widths from tenths to several MeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors apply a nonrelativistic potential model to four-quark systems where all quarks are heavy, either bottom or charm. They solve the four-body problem using the explicitly correlated Gaussian method to obtain a complete set of 1S state masses for the four flavor combinations listed. These masses fall into narrow windows around 16 GeV for the bottom-rich system, 9.7 GeV for the charm-rich system, and 12.8-13 GeV for the mixed ones. The wave functions from the mass calculation are then fed into a quark-exchange model to estimate how easily each state can decay by rearranging into two ordinary mesons such as Upsilon plus J/psi or B_c plus J/psi. The resulting widths are small, typically a few MeV or less, which would make the states relatively long-lived and potentially visible as peaks in invariant-mass distributions at hadron colliders. The work stays within the established framework of phenomenological quark models that have been used for decades to describe heavy mesons and baryons, but extends the technique to these particular all-heavy, mixed-flavor tetraquarks.

Core claim

The 1S states of the all-heavy tetraquarks with different flavors may have narrow fall-apart decay widths, ranging from a few tenths to several MeV. Some may have good potentials to be established at LHC in their optimal fall-apart decay channels, such as ΥJ/ψ, ΥB_c^-, and J/ψB_c^+. (abstract)

Load-bearing premise

The nonrelativistic potential quark model with parameters fitted to known mesons remains accurate for these four-body systems, and the quark-exchange model correctly captures the fall-apart decay dynamics without significant relativistic or multi-body effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03047 by Jun-Jie Liu, Lin-Qin Xie, Ming-Sheng Liu, Wei-Xiang Wang, Xian-Hui Zhong, Zhi-Biao Liang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Mass spectrum of all-heavy tetraquarks with di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: A comparison of the masses of the lowest 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: A comparison of the masses of the lowest 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: A comparison of the masses of the lowest 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: A comparison of the masses of the lowest 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In a nonrelativistic potential quark model framework, we carry out a precise calculation of the mass spectrum of the all-heavy tetraquarks with different flavors, $bb\bar{b}\bar{c}$, $cc\bar{c}\bar{b}$, $bb\bar{c}\bar{c}$, and $bc\bar{b}\bar{c}$, by adopting the explicitly correlated Gaussian method. A complete mass spectrum for the $1S$ states is obtained. For the $bb\bar{b}\bar{c}$, $cc\bar{c}\bar{b}$, $bb\bar{c}\bar{c}$, and $bc\bar{b}\bar{c}$ systems, the $1S$ states are predicted to lie in the mass ranges of $ \sim(16.06,16.14)$, $\sim(9.65,9.74)$, $\sim(12.89,12.94)$, and $\sim(12.75,12.99)$~GeV, respectively.Moreover, by using the obtained masses and wave functions, we evaluate the fall-apart decay properties within a quark-exchange model.The results show that the $1S$ states of the all-heavy tetraquarks with different flavors may have narrow fall-apart decay widths,which ranging from a few tenths to several MeV. Some all-heavy tetraquarks with different flavors may have good potentials to be established at LHC in their optimal fall-apart decay channels, such as $\Upsilon J/\psi$, $\Upsilon B_c^-$, and $J/\psi B_c^+$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper calculates the mass spectra of the 1S states for all-heavy tetraquarks with different flavors (bb b-bar c-bar, cc c-bar b-bar, bb c-bar c-bar, bc b-bar c-bar) in a nonrelativistic potential quark model using the explicitly correlated Gaussian method, reporting mass ranges of approximately (16.06-16.14), (9.65-9.74), (12.89-12.94), and (12.75-12.99) GeV respectively. It then evaluates fall-apart decay widths via a quark-exchange model, finding narrow widths from a few tenths to several MeV and suggesting observability at the LHC in channels such as ΥJ/ψ, ΥB_c^-, and J/ψB_c^+.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies concrete numerical predictions for masses and decay widths of exotic all-heavy tetraquarks that could directly guide experimental searches at the LHC, helping to test the applicability of quark models to multiquark systems and potentially identifying new states beyond conventional hadrons.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2] §2 (potential model and fitting): The quark potential parameters are described as fitted to known heavy-meson masses, but no explicit parameter values, fitting procedure, or goodness-of-fit metrics are provided. This is load-bearing because the tetraquark masses and wave functions are computed directly from these parameters, preventing independent assessment of the numerical ranges.
  2. [§4] §4 (decay calculation): The quark-exchange model for fall-apart widths is applied to the four-body systems without derivation details, validation on known states, or discussion of relativistic/multi-body corrections. This directly supports the central claim of narrow widths (tenths to several MeV) and LHC accessibility, yet lacks the quantitative checks needed to establish reliability.
  3. [Numerical results] Numerical results section: The reported mass intervals and decay widths are presented without uncertainties, sensitivity analyses to parameter variations, or error propagation from the meson fits. This undermines the precision claims for the 1S states and the assertion that some channels are experimentally promising.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains a grammatical error: 'widths,which ranging' should be 'widths, ranging'.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for flavor combinations (e.g., bb b-bar c-bar) should be standardized and cross-checked against the tables for consistency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments highlight important areas for improving transparency and rigor. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §2 (potential model and fitting): The quark potential parameters are described as fitted to known heavy-meson masses, but no explicit parameter values, fitting procedure, or goodness-of-fit metrics are provided. This is load-bearing because the tetraquark masses and wave functions are computed directly from these parameters, preventing independent assessment of the numerical ranges.

    Authors: We agree that explicit details are necessary for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection in §2 listing all potential parameters (including the values of α, β, and the Coulomb and linear coefficients), describe the χ² minimization procedure used to fit the known heavy-meson spectrum (η_c, J/ψ, B_c, Υ, etc.), and report the resulting goodness-of-fit metric along with the fitted masses for comparison with experiment. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4 (decay calculation): The quark-exchange model for fall-apart widths is applied to the four-body systems without derivation details, validation on known states, or discussion of relativistic/multi-body corrections. This directly supports the central claim of narrow widths (tenths to several MeV) and LHC accessibility, yet lacks the quantitative checks needed to establish reliability.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for additional methodological transparency. The revised version will include an expanded §4 with a brief derivation of the quark-exchange transition amplitude for fall-apart decays, validation tests on conventional heavy mesons (e.g., reproducing known widths or selection rules where applicable), and a discussion of the model's limitations, including the neglect of relativistic corrections and multi-body effects, which are consistent with the nonrelativistic framework used for the masses. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Numerical results section: The reported mass intervals and decay widths are presented without uncertainties, sensitivity analyses to parameter variations, or error propagation from the meson fits. This undermines the precision claims for the 1S states and the assertion that some channels are experimentally promising.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative uncertainty estimates would strengthen the presentation. In the revision, we will add a sensitivity analysis by varying the fitted potential parameters within their 1σ ranges from the meson fit and recomputing the tetraquark masses and widths to obtain uncertainty bands. Full analytic error propagation is not feasible within the variational Gaussian method, but the sensitivity study will provide a practical estimate of theoretical uncertainty. revision: partial

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation depends on a nonrelativistic potential whose parameters are fitted to known mesons and on the assumption that the explicitly correlated Gaussian basis accurately solves the four-body Schrödinger equation for these systems.

free parameters (1)
  • Quark potential parameters
    Standard parameters of the nonrelativistic potential (string tension, Coulomb strength, etc.) fitted to known heavy-meson spectra.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Non-relativistic treatment is valid for bottom and charm quark systems
    Invoked by adopting the nonrelativistic potential quark model framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5589 in / 1438 out tokens · 176136 ms · 2026-05-13T17:49:28.673900+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, and Key L aboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Educa tion, Changsha 410081, China

    work page

  2. [2]

    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Intelligent Photonics, School of Science, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianj in 300384, China and

    work page

  3. [3]

    All-heavy tetraquarks with different flavors

    Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum E ffects and Applications (SICQEA), Hunan Normal University, C hangsha 410081, China In a nonrelativistic potential quark model framework, we ca rry out a precise calculation of the mass spec- trum of the all-heavy tetraquarks with di fferent flavors, bb¯b¯c, cc¯c¯b, bb¯c¯c, and bc¯b¯c, by adopting the explicitly corr...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    H = 4∑ i=1 (mi + Ti) −TG + ∑ i< j Vi j(ri j), (1) where mi and Ti stand for the mass and kinetic energy of the i- th quark, respectively

    Hamiltonian In this work, to describe the tetraquark system we adopt a nonrelativistic Hamiltonian [9], i.e. H = 4∑ i=1 (mi + Ti) −TG + ∑ i< j Vi j(ri j), (1) where mi and Ti stand for the mass and kinetic energy of the i- th quark, respectively. TG is the center-of-mass kinetic energy. Vi j(ri j) represents the e ffective potentials between the i-th and j...

    work page

  5. [5]

    In the flavor space, the available configurations for all all-heavy tetraquark systems with di ffer- ent flavors are bb¯b¯c, cc¯c¯b, bb¯c¯c, and bc¯b¯c

    States classified in the quark model To calculate the spectroscopy of a Q1Q2 ¯Q3 ¯Q4 system, first we construct the configurations in the product space of spa- tial ⊗flavor ⊗color ⊗spin. In the flavor space, the available configurations for all all-heavy tetraquark systems with di ffer- ent flavors are bb¯b¯c, cc¯c¯b, bb¯c¯c, and bc¯b¯c. This implies that the flav...

    work page

  6. [6]

    It is a well-established variational method to solve quantum few - body problems

    Numerical method To solve the four-body problem accurately, we adopt the explicitly correlated Gaussian (ECG) method [ 56– 58]. It is a well-established variational method to solve quantum few - body problems. The spatial part of the wave function for the 1S -wave tetraquark system is expanded in terms of ECG basis 3 TABLE II: Configurations of all-heavy t...

    work page

  7. [7]

    In contrast, in this work, the main component of the higher-mass state is |bb ¯3 1(¯b¯c)3 1⟩0 0 and that of the lower-mass state is |bb6 0(¯b¯c)¯6 0⟩0

    work page

  8. [8]

    The main reason for this di fference is that the trial wave function adopted in this work is more complete than that used previously, as dis- cussed in Sec. II (A3). 6 TABLE V: The numerical results of the mass spectrum (in MeV), the mass contributions of each Hamiltonian part (in MeV), an d the root- mean-square radii (in fm) for the 1 S -wave eigenstates...

    work page

  9. [9]

    29 −0. 95 0 . 13 −0. 96 −0. 29 0 . 06                               |{bb}6 0(¯b¯c)¯6 1⟩ 0 1 |{bb}¯3 1(¯b¯c)3 0⟩ 0 1 |{bb}¯3 1(¯b¯c)3 1⟩ 0 1                               16126 16119 16066                800/ 444/ −1159/ 2 0 . 27/ 0. 37/ 0. 30/ 0. 38/ 0. 38/ 0. 30 792/ 427/ −1138/ −...

    work page

  10. [10]

    89 −0. 39 0 . 22                               |{cc}6 0(¯c¯b)¯6 1⟩ 0 1 |{cc}¯3 1(¯c¯b)3 0⟩ 0 1 |{cc}¯3 1(¯c¯b)3 1⟩ 0 1                               9723 9722 9659                751/ 578/ −920/ 13 0 . 47/ 0. 39/ 0. 49/ 0. 43/ 0. 43/ 0. 49 750/ 584/ −920/ 7 0 . 48/ 0. 41/ 0. 49/ 0....

    work page

  11. [11]

    81 −0. 46 0 . 36 −0. 03 −0. 35 −0. 81 −0. 30 −0. 38                                             |(bc)6 0(¯b¯c) ¯6 0⟩ 0 0 |(bc)6 1(¯b¯c) ¯6 1⟩ 0 0 |(bc)¯3 0(¯b¯c)3 0⟩ 0 0 |(bc)¯3 1(¯b¯c)3 1⟩ 0 0                                             12985 12936 12853 12752    ...

    work page

  12. [12]

    39 −0. 91 −0. 06 0 . 15 −0. 67 −0. 27 0 . 59 0 . 35 −0. 62 −0. 30 −0. 61 −0. 40                                             |(bc)6 1(¯b¯c)¯6 1⟩ 0 1 |(bc)¯3 1(¯b¯c)3 1⟩ 0 1 |(bc)6 1(¯b¯c)¯6 0⟩ 0− 1 |(bc)¯3 1(¯b¯c)3 0⟩ 0− 1                                             129...

    work page

  13. [13]

    It should be mentioned that the results obtained with complex scaling method [ 25] are systematically ∼450 MeV larger than ours

    Our results are com- patible with the nonrelativistic quark model predictions b ased on dynamic calculations [ 21– 24] and di ffusion Monte Carlo calculations [20], the diquark model predictions [ 27, 30, 31], and the results predicted by the CGAN framework [ 53]. It should be mentioned that the results obtained with complex scaling method [ 25] are system...

    work page

  14. [14]

    They are mixed states between two di fferent color configurations 6 ⊗¯6 and ¯3 ⊗3

    0+ states For the two 0 + states T(bb¯b¯c)0+ (16132) and T(bb¯b¯c)0+ (16064), there is a significant mass splitting, ∆M ≃ 70 MeV , which is mainly due to the spin-spin interactions. They are mixed states between two di fferent color configurations 6 ⊗¯6 and ¯3 ⊗3. The high mass state T(bb¯b¯c)0+ (16132) is dominated by the ¯3 ⊗3, while the low mass state T(b...

    work page

  15. [15]

    There is a significant mass gap ∆M ≃50 MeV be- tween them and the low-lying state T(bb¯b¯c)1+ (16066)

    1+ states Among the three 1 + states, the two high-lying states T(bb¯b¯c)1+ (16126) and T(bb¯b¯c)1+ (16119) are nearly degenerate to- gether. There is a significant mass gap ∆M ≃50 MeV be- tween them and the low-lying state T(bb¯b¯c)1+ (16066). The configuration mixing in these states is slight. As shown in Table V, the low-lying state T(bb¯b¯c)1+ (16066) i...

    work page

  16. [16]

    The ΥB∗ c is the only allowed fall-apart decay channel of T(bb¯b¯c)2+ (16139)

    2+ state For the 2+ state T(bb¯b¯c)2+ (16139), as a pure |bb ¯3 1(¯b¯c)3 1⟩0 2 state, whose mass is very close to that of the high-lying 0 + and 1 + states, T(bb¯b¯c)0+ (16132) and T(bb¯b¯c)1+ (16126). The ΥB∗ c is the only allowed fall-apart decay channel of T(bb¯b¯c)2+ (16139). The partial width is predicted to be Γ[T(bb¯b¯c)2+ (16139) → ΥB∗ c] ≃0. 86 M...

    work page

  17. [17]

    0+ states For the two T(cc¯c¯b)0+ (9733) and T(cc¯c¯b)0+ (9650), the mass splitting is predicted to be ∆M ≃ 90 MeV . The mass split- ting between T(bb¯b¯c)0+ (16132) and T(bb¯b¯c)0+ (16064), ∆M ≃ 70 MeV , is lightly smaller than that of the cc¯c¯b system is due to the suppression of the heavy bottom quark. As shown in Table V, the T(cc¯c¯b)0+ (9736) and T...

    work page

  18. [18]

    There is a signif- icant mass gap ∆M ≃ 40 MeV between them and the low-lying state T(cc¯c¯b)1+ (9659) originating from the di fference of color structure

    1+ states The two high-lying 1 + states T(cc¯c¯b)1+ (9722) and T(cc¯c¯b)1+ (9723) are highly degenerate. There is a signif- icant mass gap ∆M ≃ 40 MeV between them and the low-lying state T(cc¯c¯b)1+ (9659) originating from the di fference of color structure. Sizeable configuration mixing exists in these 1 + states. As shown in Table V, the low-lying state ...

    work page

  19. [19]

    The J/ψB∗ c is the only allowed fall-apart decay channel in all of T(cc¯c¯b)2+ (9738)

    2+ state For the 2 + state T(cc¯c¯b)2+ (9738), as a pure |cc¯3 1(¯c¯b)3 1⟩0 2 state, the mass is very close to that of the high-lying 0+ and 1+ states, T(cc¯c¯b)0+ (9733) and T(cc¯c¯b)1+ (9723). The J/ψB∗ c is the only allowed fall-apart decay channel in all of T(cc¯c¯b)2+ (9738). The partial width is predicted to be Γ[T(cc¯c¯b)2+ (9738) → ΥB∗ c] ≃0. 18 M...

    work page

  20. [20]

    Our re- sults are generally compatible with the nonrelativistic qu ark model predictions based on dynamic calculations [ 10, 21– 23] and di ffusion Monte Carlo calculations [ 20], the diquark model predictions [ 27, 30], and the results predicted by the CGAN framework [53]

    work page

  21. [21]

    As shown in Table V, they are mixed states between two di ffer- ent color configurations

    0+ states For the two 0 + states, T(bb¯c¯c)0+ (12942) and T(bb¯c¯c)0+ (12888), there is a significant mass splitting of ∆M ∼ 50 MeV . As shown in Table V, they are mixed states between two di ffer- ent color configurations. The high and low mass states are dominated by the |{bb}¯3 1(¯c¯c)3 1⟩0 0 and |{bb}6 0(¯c¯c)¯6 0⟩0 0 components, respectively. The mass o...

    work page

  22. [22]

    For the T(bb¯c¯c)1+ (12931) and T(bb¯c¯c)2+ (12944), the allowed fall-apart decay channels are BcB∗ c and B∗ cB∗ c, respectively

    1+ and 2+ states The T(bb¯c¯c)2+ (12944), as the highest mass state in the bb¯c¯c system, only about 13 MeV lies above the 1 + state T(bb¯c¯c)1+ (12931), and is also nearly degenerate with the high- lying 0 + state T(bb¯c¯c)0+ (12942), due to the similar color-spin structures. For the T(bb¯c¯c)1+ (12931) and T(bb¯c¯c)2+ (12944), the allowed fall-apart dec...

    work page

  23. [23]

    Our results are generally compatible with the nonrelativistic quark model pre- dictions based on dynamic calculations [ 21– 23], the diquark model predictions [ 27, 28], and the results predicted by the CGAN framework [53]

    work page

  24. [24]

    From Ta- ble V, one can find that the dominant color component of the two high-lying states T(bc¯b¯c)0++ (12985) and T(bc¯b¯c)0++(12936) is ¯3 ⊗3

    0++ states For the four JP = 0++ states, there are strong configuration mixings between the 6 ⊗¯6 and ¯3 ⊗3 configurations. From Ta- ble V, one can find that the dominant color component of the two high-lying states T(bc¯b¯c)0++ (12985) and T(bc¯b¯c)0++(12936) is ¯3 ⊗3. While for the two low-lying states T(bc¯b¯c)0++(12853) and T(bc¯b¯c)0++ (12752), the domi...

    work page

  25. [25]

    The dominant color component of the two high-lying states T(bc¯b¯c)1+−(12987) and T(bc¯b¯c)1+−(12970) is ¯3 ⊗3

    1+−states For the four JP = 1+−states, there are also strong config- uration mixings between the 6 ⊗¯6 and ¯3 ⊗3 configurations. The dominant color component of the two high-lying states T(bc¯b¯c)1+−(12987) and T(bc¯b¯c)1+−(12970) is ¯3 ⊗3. While for the two low-lying states T(bc¯b¯c)1+−(12826) and T(bc¯b¯c)1+−(12780), the dominant color component is 6 ⊗¯6....

    work page

  26. [26]

    It may have sizeable decay rates into the BcB∗ c = B+ c B∗− c + B∗+ c B− c and B∗+ c B∗− c channels with comparable partial widths Γ[T(bc¯b¯c)1+−(12780) → BcB∗ c/ B∗+ c B∗− c ] ≃0

    4 MeV . It may have sizeable decay rates into the BcB∗ c = B+ c B∗− c + B∗+ c B− c and B∗+ c B∗− c channels with comparable partial widths Γ[T(bc¯b¯c)1+−(12780) → BcB∗ c/ B∗+ c B∗− c ] ≃0. 21/ 0. 14 MeV. (41) For the other 1 +− states, the fall-apart decay widths are pre- dicted to be ∼100 keV . These states may be di fficult to ob- serve in their fall-apar...

    work page

  27. [27]

    The low-mass state T(bc¯b¯c)1++(12862) and the high-mass state T(bc¯b¯c)1++ (12945) are governed by the 6 ⊗¯6 and ¯3⊗3 com- ponents, respectively

    1++ and 2++ states From Table V, one can find that there is a slight mixing be- tween the 6 ⊗¯6 and ¯3 ⊗3 configurations in the 1 ++ and 2 ++ states. The low-mass state T(bc¯b¯c)1++(12862) and the high-mass state T(bc¯b¯c)1++ (12945) are governed by the 6 ⊗¯6 and ¯3⊗3 com- ponents, respectively. However, for the 2 ++ sector, the case is reversed, the low-ma...

    work page

  28. [28]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Observation of structure in the J/ψ -pair mass spectrum, Sci. Bull. 65, 1983-1993 (2020)

    work page 1983

  29. [29]

    Hayrapetyan et al

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. [CMS], New Structures in the J /ψJ/ψ Mass Spectrum in Proton-Proton Collisions at s =13 TeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [A TLAS], Observation of an Excess of Dichar- monium Events in the Four-Muon Final State with the A TLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Iwasaki, A Possible Model for New Resonances-Exotics and Hidden Charm, Prog

    Y . Iwasaki, A Possible Model for New Resonances-Exotics and Hidden Charm, Prog. Theor. Phys. 54, 492 (1975)

    work page 1975

  32. [32]

    K. T. Chao, The (cc)-( ¯ cc) (Diquark-Anti-Diquark) States in e+e−Annihilation, Z. Phys. C 7, 317 (1981)

    work page 1981

  33. [33]

    W. Chen, H. X. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele and S. L. Zhu, Hunt- ing for exotic doubly hidden-charm /bottom tetraquark states, Phys. Lett. B 773, 247-251 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    J. Wu, Y . R. Liu, K. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Heavy-flavore d tetraquark states with the QQ ¯Q ¯Q configuration, Phys. Rev. D 97, no.9, 094015 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    V . R. Debastiani and F. S. Navarra, A non-relativistic model for the [cc][¯c¯c] tetraquark, Chin. Phys. C 43, no.1, 013105 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    M. S. Liu, Q. F. L¨ u, X. H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, All-heavy tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 100, no.1, 016006 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    G. J. Wang, L. Meng and S. L. Zhu, Spectrum of the fully-he avy tetraquark state QQ ¯Q′¯Q′, Phys. Rev. D 100, no.9, 096013 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    M. A. Bedolla, J. Ferretti, C. D. Roberts and E. San- topinto, Spectrum of fully-heavy tetraquarks from a di- quark+antidiquark perspective, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, no.11, 1004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Mutuk, Nonrelativistic treatment of fully-heavy te traquarks as diquark-antidiquark states, Eur

    H. Mutuk, Nonrelativistic treatment of fully-heavy te traquarks as diquark-antidiquark states, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, no.4, 367 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Khachatryan et al

    V . Khachatryan et al. [CMS], Observation of Υ(1S) pair pro- duction in proton-proton collisions at √ s = 8 TeV , JHEP 05, 013 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Measurement of the Υ(1S) pair production cross section and search for resonances decayin g to Υ(1S)µ+µ− in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , Phys. Lett. B 808, 135578 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Search for beautiful tetraquarks in the Υ(1S )µ+µ−invariant-mass spectrum, JHEP 10, 086 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Observation of Two Excited B + c States and Measurement of the B + c (2S) Mass in pp Collisions at√ s = 13 TeV , Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 132001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Observation of an excited B+ c state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 232001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Observation of Orbitally Excited B+ c States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 231902 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Search for the doubly heavy baryon Ξ+ bc decaying to J/ψΞ+ c , Chin. Phys. C 47, 093001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    M. C. Gordillo, F. De Soto and J. Segovia, Di ffusion Monte Carlo calculations of fully-heavy multiquark bound states , Phys. Rev. D 102, 114007 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    H. T. An, S. Q. Luo, Z. W. Liu and X. Liu, Spectroscopic beh av- ior of fully heavy tetraquarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 740 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    C. Deng, H. Chen and J. Ping, Towards the understanding o f fully-heavy tetraquark states from various models, Phys. R ev. D 103, 014001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Zhang, J

    J. Zhang, J. B. Wang, G. Li, C. S. An, C. R. Deng and J. J. Xie , Spectrum of the S-wave fully-heavy tetraquark states, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1126 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    J. Hu, B. R. He and J. L. Ping, Investigating full-heavy tetraquarks composed of cc¯c¯b and bb¯b¯c, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 559 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    W. L. Wu, Y . Ma, Y . K. Chen, L. Meng and S. L. Zhu, Fully heavy tetraquark resonant states with di fferent flavors, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034030 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    P . G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, F. Fern´ andez and J. Segovia, Constituent-quark-model based coupled-channels calcula tion of the bb¯c¯c and bc¯b¯c tetraquark systems, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054016 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    R. N. Faustov, V . O. Galkin and E. M. Savchenko, Masses of the QQ ¯Q ¯Q tetraquarks in the relativistic diquark–antidiquark picture, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114030 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    R. N. Faustov, V . O. Galkin and E. M. Savchenko, Fully Hea vy Tetraquark Spectroscopy in the Relativistic Quark Model, Sym- metry 14, 2504 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    V . O. Galkin and E. M. Savchenko, Relativistic descript ion of asymmetric fully heavy tetraquarks in the diquark-antidiq uark model, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 96 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Mohan and R

    B. Mohan and R. Dhir, A baryon-calibrated unified quark- diquark e ffective mass formalism for heavy multiquarks, [arXiv:2603.04175 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Mutuk, Spectrum of cc¯b¯b, bc¯c¯c, and bc¯b ¯b tetraquark states in the dynamical diquark model, Phys

    H. Mutuk, Spectrum of cc¯b¯b, bc¯c¯c, and bc¯b ¯b tetraquark states in the dynamical diquark model, Phys. Lett. B 834, 137404 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Z. H. Yang, Q. N. Wang, W. Chen and H. X. Chen, Investigation of the stability for fully-heavy bc¯b¯c tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Q. N. Wang, Z. Y . Yang, W. Chen and H. X. Chen, Mass spec- tra for the cc¯b¯b and bb¯c¯c tetraquark states, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014020 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    W. Chen, Q. N. Wang, Z. Y . Yang, H. X. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele and S. L. Zhu, Searching for fully-heavy tetraqu ark states in QCD moment sum rules, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 318- 323, 73-77 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Heavy axial-vector st ruc- tures bb¯c¯c, Phys. Lett. B 851, 138562 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Parameters of the tens or tetraquark bb¯c¯c, Phys. Lett. B 856, 138886 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Pseudoscalar and vect or tetraquarks bb¯c¯c, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 14 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, B. Barsbay and H. Sundu, Scalar exo tic mesons bb¯c¯c, J. Phys. G 51, 115001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Heavy four-quark meso ns b¯cb¯c: Scalar particle, Phys. Lett. B 858, 139042 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Hidden charm-bottom structures b¯c¯bc: Axial-vector case, Phys. Lett. B 864, 139404 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Properties of the tens or state b¯c¯bc, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074025 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Fully heavy asymmetri c scalar tetraquarks, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 118 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Heavy scalar molecule B+ c B− c , Phys. Rev. D 112, 054001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Axial-vector molecul ar structures B∗± c B∓ c , Phys. Lett. B 870, 139885 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Hadronic tensor molec ule B∗+ c B∗− c , Phys. Lett. B 871, 140014 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Scalar molecules ηbB− c and ηcB+ c with asymmetric quark contents, [arXiv:2511.03541 [hep-ph]]. 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [74]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Axial-vector molecul es ΥB− c andηbB∗− c . [arXiv:2512.06513 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  75. [75]

    S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Molecular states J/ψB+ c andηc B∗+ c . [arXiv:2512.23030 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    X. Z. Weng, X. L. Chen, W. Z. Deng and S. L. Zhu, Systematic s of fully heavy tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 103, 034001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    Zhuang, Y

    Z. Zhuang, Y . Zhang, Y . Ma and Q. Wang, Lineshape of the compact fully heavy tetraquark, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054026 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Z. Y . Wang, J. J. Qi, Z. H. Zhang and X. H. Guo, Spectra of bc¯b¯c tetraquark states from a diquark-antidiquark perspective , Phys. Rev. D 112, 074038 (2025)

    work page 2025

  79. [79]

    A. J. Majarshin, Y . A. Luo, F. Pan and J. Segovia, Bosonic al- gebraic approach applied to the [ QQ][ ¯Q ¯Q] tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054024 (2022)

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    Malekhosseini, S

    M. Malekhosseini, S. Rostami, A. R. Olamaei and K. Azizi , Ex- ploring fully-heavy tetraquarks through the CGAN framewor k: Mass and width, Nucl. Phys. B 1018, 116977 (2025)

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.