pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04693 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 💻 cs.CV

3D Gaussian Splatting for Annular Dark Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Tomography Reconstruction

Beiyuan Zhang , Hesong Li , Ruiwen Shao , Ying Fu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords 3D Gaussian SplattingADF-STEM tomographysparse-view reconstructionmissing wedge artifactsnanoscale materialselectron microscopy3D reconstruction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Adapting 3D Gaussian Splatting with a learnable scattering field enables accurate ADF-STEM tomography from sparse tilt views.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper adapts 3D Gaussian Splatting to annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy tomography. The goal is to produce accurate 3D reconstructions of nanoscale materials even when only a limited number of tilt views are collected, since acquiring many views increases electron dose and risks damaging the sample. The method models local scattering strength as a learnable scalar field called denza, uses a gamma coefficient to normalize scattering consistency across tilt angles, and adds a 2D Fourier amplitude term to the loss to reduce missing-wedge artifacts. Experiments on 45-view and 15-view tilt series show the resulting volumes and reprojected images align more closely with the original data than standard approaches. This matters because it could allow detailed structural analysis of dose-sensitive materials without requiring extensive tilting.

Core claim

The paper claims that by representing the sample as 3D Gaussians augmented with a learnable scalar field denza for local scattering strength, applying gamma-based scattering view normalization for tilt consistency, and optimizing a loss that includes a 2D Fourier amplitude term, DenZa-Gaussian produces high-fidelity 3D reconstructions and 2D projections from ADF-STEM tilt series that match the acquired images more closely than conventional methods, especially under sparse-view conditions such as 15 or 45 views.

What carries the argument

DenZa-Gaussian, the 3D Gaussian Splatting model modified with a learnable denza scalar field to capture local scattering strength, a gamma coefficient for view normalization, and an added 2D Fourier amplitude loss term.

If this is right

  • Accurate 3D volumes can be obtained from tilt series limited to 15 views.
  • Reprojected 2D images from the reconstruction align more closely with the measured tilt images.
  • Missing-wedge artifacts are reduced in the final 3D volumes.
  • Total electron dose delivered to the sample can be lowered while retaining structural fidelity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same modifications to Gaussian Splatting could transfer to other limited-angle tomography problems in materials or medical imaging.
  • Faster acquisition protocols enabled by fewer views might support time-resolved studies of dynamic processes in nanomaterials.
  • The learned denza values could be further analyzed to map local compositional variations across different atomic species.

Load-bearing premise

That modeling local scattering strength as a learnable scalar field plus gamma normalization and a Fourier loss term accurately captures ADF-STEM physics and suppresses artifacts without introducing new biases or losing real structural features.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison, on a test sample with independently known 3D structure such as a nanoparticle with documented internal voids, showing whether the 15-view DenZa-Gaussian reconstruction matches or deviates from the dense-view ground truth in specific measurable features like void positions or density gradients.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04693 by Beiyuan Zhang, Hesong Li, Ruiwen Shao, Ying Fu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Projection comparison under 15-view reconstruc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pipeline of Denza-Gaussian. DenZa-Gaussian is a two-stage Architecture tailored for sparse-view ADF-STEM tomography. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Results of qualitative comparison under 45-view. We [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results of qualitative comparison under 15-view. We [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Impact of ground truth (GT) image resolution. In each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Analytical Dark Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (ADF-STEM) tomography reconstructs nanoscale materials in 3D by integrating multi-view tilt-series images, enabling precise analysis of their structural and compositional features. Although integrating more tilt views improves 3D reconstruction, it requires extended electron exposure that risks damaging dose-sensitive materials and introduces drift and misalignment, making it difficult to balance reconstruction fidelity with sample preservation. In practice, sparse-view acquisition is frequently required, yet conventional ADF-STEM methods degrade under limited views, exhibiting artifacts and reduced structural fidelity. To resolve these issues, in this paper, we adapt 3D GS to this domain with three key components. We first model the local scattering strength as a learnable scalar field, denza, to address the mismatch between 3DGS and ADF-STEM imaging physics. Then we introduce a coefficient $\gamma$ to stabilize scattering across tilt angles, ensuring consistent denza via scattering view normalization. Finally, We incorporate a loss function that includes a 2D Fourier amplitude term to suppress missing wedge artifacts in sparse-view reconstruction. Experiments on 45-view and 15-view tilt series show that DenZa-Gaussian produces high-fidelity reconstructions and 2D projections that align more closely with original tilts, demonstrating superior robustness under sparse-view conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents DenZa-Gaussian, an adaptation of 3D Gaussian Splatting for annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (ADF-STEM) tomography. It replaces the standard density with a learnable 'denza' scalar field to better match scattering physics, introduces a view-normalization coefficient γ, and adds a 2D Fourier amplitude consistency loss to mitigate missing-wedge artifacts in sparse tilt-series reconstructions. Experiments on 45-view and 15-view tilt series are reported to yield higher-fidelity 3D volumes and projections that more closely match the input tilts, claiming improved robustness for dose-sensitive samples.

Significance. Should the quantitative superiority hold and the learnable denza field prove to respect ADF-STEM forward physics, the work would offer a practical route to high-quality 3D reconstructions from limited projections, thereby lowering electron dose and enabling tomography on beam-sensitive nanomaterials. The explicit handling of the physics mismatch between 3DGS and ADF-STEM via denza and the Fourier term is a constructive contribution; credit is due for targeting the sparse-view regime that is common in practice.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: The central claim of superior performance and robustness under 15-view conditions is asserted without accompanying quantitative metrics (e.g., PSNR, RMSE, or structural similarity scores), baseline comparisons to established ADF-STEM tomography algorithms such as SIRT or compressed-sensing methods, or error bars. This absence makes it difficult to assess the magnitude of improvement and undermines verification of the claim that DenZa-Gaussian 'aligns more closely with original tilts'.
  2. [Method] Method section, denza field definition: Modeling local scattering strength as an unconstrained learnable scalar field 'denza' (rather than a quantity derived from the known Z² dependence of high-angle scattering) removes the direct link to the ADF-STEM imaging model. Under sparse 15-view sampling, the optimizer can therefore redistribute scattering strength into the missing wedge to minimize the 2D Fourier loss without recovering true 3D structure; the γ normalization and Fourier term alone do not constrain the unsampled Fourier components. This is load-bearing for the robustness claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a capitalization inconsistency ('We incorporate') and would benefit from a brief quantitative statement of observed improvements to support the superiority claim.
  2. [Introduction] The manuscript should include citations to the original 3D Gaussian Splatting work and to standard references on ADF-STEM tomography reconstruction for context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the quantitative support and methodological clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: The central claim of superior performance and robustness under 15-view conditions is asserted without accompanying quantitative metrics (e.g., PSNR, RMSE, or structural similarity scores), baseline comparisons to established ADF-STEM tomography algorithms such as SIRT or compressed-sensing methods, or error bars. This absence makes it difficult to assess the magnitude of improvement and undermines verification of the claim that DenZa-Gaussian 'aligns more closely with original tilts'.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics and baselines are necessary to substantiate the performance claims. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated results table reporting PSNR, RMSE, and SSIM values for DenZa-Gaussian versus SIRT and compressed-sensing reconstructions on both the 45-view and 15-view tilt series. Error bars are included from three independent runs with varied initializations. A supplementary figure further quantifies projection alignment error, confirming closer fidelity to the input tilts under sparse sampling. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Method] Method section, denza field definition: Modeling local scattering strength as an unconstrained learnable scalar field 'denza' (rather than a quantity derived from the known Z² dependence of high-angle scattering) removes the direct link to the ADF-STEM imaging model. Under sparse 15-view sampling, the optimizer can therefore redistribute scattering strength into the missing wedge to minimize the 2D Fourier loss without recovering true 3D structure; the γ normalization and Fourier term alone do not constrain the unsampled Fourier components. This is load-bearing for the robustness claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee’s point that an unconstrained denza field departs from a strict Z²-derived model. The learnable formulation was chosen to accommodate real ADF-STEM scattering variations (e.g., channeling, thickness effects) that are not captured by a fixed Z² law. We maintain that the combination of the view-normalization coefficient γ and the 2D Fourier amplitude loss provides effective regularization: γ enforces tilt-consistent scattering strength while the Fourier term penalizes inconsistencies in the sampled Fourier components, thereby limiting arbitrary redistribution into the missing wedge. In the revision we have expanded the method section with a dedicated paragraph on this regularization mechanism and added an ablation study demonstrating that removal of either term produces visible missing-wedge artifacts and degraded metrics. We also include a brief discussion of the Z² alternative and its limitations in the experimental regime. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper adapts 3D Gaussian Splatting by defining a learnable scalar field 'denza' for local scattering strength, a per-view normalization coefficient γ, and a 2D Fourier amplitude loss term. These components are optimized during training to match observed tilt-series data rather than derived from the target reconstruction by construction. No equations reduce outputs to inputs tautologically, no self-citations load-bear the central claims, and no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are smuggled in. Experimental validation on 45-view and 15-view series provides external comparison points, keeping the chain independent of its own fitted values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The approach rests on the assumption that 3D Gaussian Splatting can be extended to electron scattering via a scalar field and that the added loss term targets the dominant artifact source.

free parameters (2)
  • denza
    Learnable scalar field representing local scattering strength, optimized per point.
  • gamma
    Coefficient for scattering view normalization across tilt angles.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption ADF-STEM image formation can be approximated by a scalar scattering strength field without needing full wave optics.
    Invoked to bridge 3DGS representation with microscopy physics.
invented entities (1)
  • denza no independent evidence
    purpose: Learnable scalar field for local scattering strength
    New entity introduced to address mismatch between standard 3DGS and ADF-STEM imaging.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5537 in / 1394 out tokens · 47717 ms · 2026-05-10T19:37:33.631354+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Motion-Enabled Tomography via Gaussian Mixture Models

    math.NA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A parametric GMM model for motion-enabled tomography that decouples reconstruction into sub-problems and tests on 2D simulations of intersecting trajectories.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Novel nonlin- ear reconstruction method with grey-level quantisation units for electron tomography.Scientific reports, 10(1):20146,

    Norio Baba, Kenji Kaneko, and Misuzu Baba. Novel nonlin- ear reconstruction method with grey-level quantisation units for electron tomography.Scientific reports, 10(1):20146,

    work page

  2. [2]

    Ro- bust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information.IEEE Transac- tions on information theory, 52(2):489–509, 2006

    Emmanuel J Cand `es, Justin Romberg, and Terence Tao. Ro- bust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information.IEEE Transac- tions on information theory, 52(2):489–509, 2006. 2

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Three-dimensional imaging of disloca- tions in a nanoparticle at atomic resolution.Nature, 496 (7443):74–77, 2013

    Chien-Chun Chen, Chun Zhu, Edward R White, Chin-Yi Chiu, MC Scott, BC Regan, Laurence D Marks, Yu Huang, and Jianwei Miao. Three-dimensional imaging of disloca- tions in a nanoparticle at atomic resolution.Nature, 496 (7443):74–77, 2013. 1

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Alternating direction method of multiplier for tomography with nonlocal regularizers.IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 33(10):1960–1968, 2014

    Se Young Chun, Yuni K Dewaraja, and Jeffrey A Fessler. Alternating direction method of multiplier for tomography with nonlocal regularizers.IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 33(10):1960–1968, 2014. 1

    work page 1960

  5. [5]

    3d u-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation

    ¨Ozg¨un C ¸ ic ¸ek, Ahmed Abdulkadir, Soeren S Lienkamp, Thomas Brox, and Olaf Ronneberger. 3d u-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pages 424–432. Springer,

    work page

  6. [6]

    Compressed sensing.IEEE Transactions on information theory, 52(4):1289–1306, 2006

    David L Donoho. Compressed sensing.IEEE Transactions on information theory, 52(4):1289–1306, 2006. 2

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Prac- tical cone-beam algorithm.Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1(6):612–619, 1984

    Lee A Feldkamp, Lloyd C Davis, and James W Kress. Prac- tical cone-beam algorithm.Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1(6):612–619, 1984. 1, 5, 6

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    Courier Corporation, 2012

    Louis A Hageman and David M Young.Applied iterative methods. Courier Corporation, 2012. 1

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    Springer, 2005

    Bernd J ¨ahne.Digital image processing. Springer, 2005. 6

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    SIAM, 2001

    Avinash C Kak and Malcolm Slaney.Principles of comput- erized tomographic imaging. SIAM, 2001. 1

    work page 2001

  11. [11]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.ACM Trans

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering.ACM Trans. Graph., 42(4):139–1,

    work page

  12. [12]

    Hugs: Human gaussian splats

    Muhammed Kocabas, Jen-Hao Rick Chang, James Gabriel, Oncel Tuzel, and Anurag Ranjan. Hugs: Human gaussian splats. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on com- puter vision and pattern recognition, pages 505–515, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Compressed sensing electron tomography.Ultra- microscopy, 131:70–91, 2013

    Rowan Leary, Zineb Saghi, Paul A Midgley, and Daniel J Holland. Compressed sensing electron tomography.Ultra- microscopy, 131:70–91, 2013. 1

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Single- atom level determination of 3-dimensional surface atomic structure via neural network-assisted atomic electron tomog- raphy.Nature Communications, 12(1):1962, 2021

    Juhyeok Lee, Chaehwa Jeong, and Yongsoo Yang. Single- atom level determination of 3-dimensional surface atomic structure via neural network-assisted atomic electron tomog- raphy.Nature Communications, 12(1):1962, 2021. 1, 2

    work page 1962

  15. [15]

    Mo-si-b alloys for ultrahigh-temperature structural applications.Advanced Materials, 24(26):3445–3480, 2012

    Joseph A Lemberg and Robert O Ritchie. Mo-si-b alloys for ultrahigh-temperature structural applications.Advanced Materials, 24(26):3445–3480, 2012. 1

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Dreamscene: 3d gaussian-based text-to-3d scene generation via formation pattern sampling

    Haoran Li, Haolin Shi, Wenli Zhang, Wenjun Wu, Yong Liao, Lin Wang, Lik-hang Lee, and Peng Yuan Zhou. Dreamscene: 3d gaussian-based text-to-3d scene generation via formation pattern sampling. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 214–230. Springer, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Splatpose+: Real-time image-based pose-agnostic 3d anomaly detection

    Yizhe Liu, Yan Song Hu, Yuhao Chen, and John Zelek. Splatpose+: Real-time image-based pose-agnostic 3d anomaly detection. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 378–391. Springer, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    In situ tem investigation of dislocation-mediated defor- mation in eutectic fe36ni18mn33al13 alloy.Crystals, 15(9): 792, 2025

    Fanling Meng, Jiaqi Zhu, Heyi Wang, Jiayi Li, and Yang Lu. In situ tem investigation of dislocation-mediated defor- mation in eutectic fe36ni18mn33al13 alloy.Crystals, 15(9): 792, 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Atomic electron tomography: 3d structures without crystals.Sci- ence, 353(6306):aaf2157, 2016

    Jianwei Miao, Peter Ercius, and Simon JL Billinge. Atomic electron tomography: 3d structures without crystals.Sci- ence, 353(6306):aaf2157, 2016. 1

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis.Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106, 2021

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis.Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106, 2021. 2

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Human gaussian splatting: Real-time rendering of animatable avatars

    Arthur Moreau, Jifei Song, Helisa Dhamo, Richard Shaw, Yiren Zhou, and Eduardo P ´erez-Pellitero. Human gaussian splatting: Real-time rendering of animatable avatars. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 788–798, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Correlative 3d map- ping of structure, composition, and valence state dynamics in battery cathodes via simultaneous adf-eds-eels tomography

    Jaewhan Oh, Sunggu Kim, Chaehwa Jeong, Jason Man- assa, Jonathan Schwartz, Sangmoon Yoon, Robert Hovden, Hye Ryung Byon, and Yongsoo Yang. Correlative 3d map- ping of structure, composition, and valence state dynamics in battery cathodes via simultaneous adf-eds-eels tomography. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23034, 2025. 1

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

    Stephen J Pennycook and Peter D Nellist.Scanning transmission electron microscopy: imaging and analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011. 1, 2

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Accurate real space iterative reconstruction (resire) algorithm for tomography.Scientific Reports, 13(1): 5624, 2023

    Minh Pham, Yakun Yuan, Arjun Rana, Stanley Osher, and Jianwei Miao. Accurate real space iterative reconstruction (resire) algorithm for tomography.Scientific Reports, 13(1): 5624, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Genfire: A generalized fourier iterative reconstruction algo- rithm for high-resolution 3d imaging.Scientific reports, 7 (1):10409, 2017

    Alan Pryor Jr, Yongsoo Yang, Arjun Rana, Marcus Gallagher-Jones, Jihan Zhou, Yuan Hung Lo, Georgian Melinte, Wah Chiu, Jose A Rodriguez, and Jianwei Miao. Genfire: A generalized fourier iterative reconstruction algo- rithm for high-resolution 3d imaging.Scientific reports, 7 (1):10409, 2017. 1, 5, 6

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.25075 , eprint =

    Huaizhi Qu, Xiao Wang, Gengwei Zhang, Jie Peng, and Tianlong Chen. Gem: 3d gaussian splatting for effi- cient and accurate cryo-em reconstruction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25075, 2025. 2

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds.IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 5(4):170–176, 2007

    Johann Radon. On the determination of functions from their integral values along certain manifolds.IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 5(4):170–176, 2007. 1

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U- net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmen- tation. InInternational Conference on Medical image com- puting and computer-assisted intervention, pages 234–241. Springer, 2015. 2

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization.Physics in Medicine & Biol- ogy, 53(17):4777, 2008

    Emil Y Sidky and Xiaochuan Pan. Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization.Physics in Medicine & Biol- ogy, 53(17):4777, 2008. 1

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    A survey of the use of iterative reconstruction algorithms in electron microscopy.BioMed research international, 2017(1):6482567, 2017

    Carlos Oscar S Sorzano, J Vargas, J Ot ´on, JM De La Rosa- Trev´ın, JL Vilas, M Kazemi, R Melero, L Del Ca ˜no, J Cuenca, P Conesa, et al. A survey of the use of iterative reconstruction algorithms in electron microscopy.BioMed research international, 2017(1):6482567, 2017. 1

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    DreamGaussian: Generative Gaussian Splatting for Efficient 3D Content Creation

    Jiaxiang Tang, Jiawei Ren, Hang Zhou, Ziwei Liu, and Gang Zeng. Dreamgaussian: Generative gaussian splatting for effi- cient 3d content creation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16653,

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  32. [32]

    Jeannot Trampert and Jean-Jacques Leveque. Simultane- ous iterative reconstruction technique: Physical interpreta- tion based on the generalized least squares solution.Jour- nal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 95(B8):12553– 12559, 1990. 1, 5, 6

    work page 1990

  33. [33]

    Three-dimensional nanostructure analysis of non-stained nafion in fuel-cell electrode by combined adf- stem tomography.Microscopy, 73(4):318–328, 2024

    Takuji Ube. Three-dimensional nanostructure analysis of non-stained nafion in fuel-cell electrode by combined adf- stem tomography.Microscopy, 73(4):318–328, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Parametric narrow-band inisar 3d imaging based on com- pressed sensing.Chinese Journal of Electronics, 29(3):508– 514, 2020

    Baoping Wang, Yan Zhang, Yang Fang, and Zuxun Song. Parametric narrow-band inisar 3d imaging based on com- pressed sensing.Chinese Journal of Electronics, 29(3):508– 514, 2020. 2

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Cryo- genic electron microscopy for characterizing and diagnosing batteries.Joule, 2(11):2225–2234, 2018

    Xuefeng Wang, Yejing Li, and Ying Shirley Meng. Cryo- genic electron microscopy for characterizing and diagnosing batteries.Joule, 2(11):2225–2234, 2018. 2

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Si- moncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004. 6

    work page 2004

  37. [37]

    4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering

    Guanjun Wu, Taoran Yi, Jiemin Fang, Lingxi Xie, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wei Wei, Wenyu Liu, Qi Tian, and Xinggang Wang. 4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 20310–20320, 2024. 2

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Atomic-scale identification of active sites of oxygen reduction nanocatalysts.Nature Catalysis, 7 (7):796–806, 2024

    Yao Yang, Jihan Zhou, Zipeng Zhao, Geng Sun, Saman Moniri, Colin Ophus, Yongsoo Yang, Ziyang Wei, Yakun Yuan, Cheng Zhu, et al. Atomic-scale identification of active sites of oxygen reduction nanocatalysts.Nature Catalysis, 7 (7):796–806, 2024. 6

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    X 2-gaussian: 4d radiative gaussian splatting for continuous-time tomographic reconstruction

    Weihao Yu, Yuanhao Cai, Ruyi Zha, Zhiwen Fan, Chenxin Li, and Yixuan Yuan. X 2-gaussian: 4d radiative gaussian splatting for continuous-time tomographic reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21779, 2025. 2

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Naf: neural attenuation fields for sparse-view cbct reconstruction

    Ruyi Zha, Yanhao Zhang, and Hongdong Li. Naf: neural attenuation fields for sparse-view cbct reconstruction. InIn- ternational Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pages 442–452. Springer,

    work page

  41. [41]

    R 2-gaussian: Rectifying radiative gaussian splatting for tomographic reconstruction,

    Ruyi Zha, Tao Jun Lin, Yuanhao Cai, Jiwen Cao, Yanhao Zhang, and Hongdong Li. R 2-gaussian: Rectifying radia- tive gaussian splatting for tomographic reconstruction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20693, 2024. 2

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Garfield++: Reinforced gaussian ra- diance fields for large-scale 3d scene reconstruction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12774, 2024

    Hanyue Zhang, Zhiliu Yang, Xinhe Zuo, Yuxin Tong, Ying Long, and Chen Liu. Garfield++: Reinforced gaussian ra- diance fields for large-scale 3d scene reconstruction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12774, 2024. 2

    work page arXiv 2024