pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05814 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · hep-ex· nucl-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Observation of nuclear suppression in coherent Upsilon(1S) photoproduction off heavy nuclei at the LHC

CMS Collaboration
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex hep-exnucl-th
keywords coherent photoproductionnuclear suppressiongluon shadowingUpsilon(1S)ultraperipheral collisionsvector meson productionnuclear gluonslead-lead collisions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coherent Υ(1S) photoproduction off lead nuclei is suppressed to 25% of the no-nuclear-effect baseline

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the first measurement of coherent Υ(1S) meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral lead-lead collisions at a nucleon-nucleon energy of 5.02 TeV. The process probes the nuclear gluon distribution at a momentum fraction x of order 10 to the minus 3 and at a hard scale of 22.4 GeV squared, the highest scale reached so far with this technique. The measured cross section in the central rapidity region is only one quarter of the value predicted by a model that omits nuclear modifications. This suppression is interpreted as a nuclear gluon suppression factor of 0.55. The factor is only slightly larger than the one found earlier for phi meson production, even though the scale here is two orders of magnitude higher.

Core claim

The central claim is that the ratio of the measured coherent Υ(1S) photoproduction cross section to a baseline model that neglects nuclear effects equals S_Υ(1S) = 0.25 ± 0.06 (stat) ± 0.02 (syst). This ratio is converted to a nuclear gluon suppression factor R_g^Pb(x ≈ 10^{-3}, μ² = 22.4 GeV²) = 0.55 ± 0.12 (stat) ± 0.02 (syst). The measurement uses data collected by the CMS experiment and covers the rapidity interval |y| < 1.

What carries the argument

The suppression ratio S_Υ(1S), which is the measured photoproduction cross section divided by the baseline model prediction that ignores nuclear effects; this ratio is mapped to the nuclear gluon suppression factor R_g under the assumption that the process is dominated by gluon interactions at leading order.

If this is right

  • Nuclear suppression of gluons is confirmed at a scale two orders of magnitude higher than previous coherent phi photoproduction results.
  • The gluon suppression factor changes only modestly when the probed scale increases from a few GeV squared to 22 GeV squared.
  • Coherent vector-meson photoproduction continues to serve as a probe of nuclear gluon distributions even at the Υ mass scale where nonlinear effects are expected to be small.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The weak scale dependence of the suppression suggests that gluon shadowing in nuclei may remain roughly constant over a wide range of hard scales at small x.
  • These data provide an anchor point for global fits of nuclear parton distributions at small x and moderate virtuality.
  • Extending the measurement to forward rapidities would allow mapping the x-dependence of the suppression within a single experiment.

Load-bearing premise

The baseline model without nuclear effects correctly predicts the absolute photoproduction cross section on free nucleons.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the Υ(1S) photoproduction cross section on a free proton that deviates substantially from the baseline model used here would remove the direct link between the observed ratio and the nuclear gluon suppression factor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.05814 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Invariant mass distribution of muon pairs with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Differential cross section for coherent Υ(1S) production in the central |y| < 1.0 and forward 1.0 < |y| < 2.4 intervals. The vertical error bars and boxes represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. The results are compared with theoretical predictions from the impulse approximation (IA) [13, 59], STARLIGHT [59], and LTA model with two nu￾clear shadowing scenarios [14] in the top … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Coherent Υ(1S) photoproduction cross section per γPb interaction as a function of WγN. The vertical error bars and boxes represent statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. The data are compared with calculations based on the impulse approximation (IA) [13, 59], STARLIGHT [59], the NLO pQCD + Data-Driven (γp) approach [44], and several models (named “IP BFKL”, “IP BK” and “CGC”) within the CG… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The first measurement of coherent $\Upsilon$(1S) meson photoproduction off heavy nuclei is performed using ultraperipheral lead-lead collisions collected by the CMS experiment at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV. The nuclear gluonic structure is probed at a nucleon momentum fraction of order $x$ $\sim$ 10$^{-3}$, determined by the kinematics of the process. Owing to the large $\Upsilon$(1S) mass, the measurement reaches the highest scale accessible so far through coherent vector-meson photoproduction, $\mu^2$ = 22.4 GeV$^2$, where nonlinear quantum chromodynamics effects are expected to be minimal. In the $\Upsilon$(1S) rapidity range $\lvert y\rvert$ $\lt$ 1, the ratio of the measured photoproduction cross section to a baseline model prediction that neglects nuclear effects is $S_{\Upsilon\text{(1S)}}$ = 0.25 $\pm$ 0.06 (stat) $\pm$ 0.02 (syst), thereby demonstrating nuclear suppression in this process. Expressed in terms of a nuclear gluon suppression factor, the result yields $R_\text{g}^\text{Pb}$($x$ $\approx$ 10$^{-3}$, $\mu^2$ = 22.4 GeV$^2$) = 0.55 $\pm$ 0.12 (stat) $\pm$ 0.02 (syst). The measured $R_\text{g}^\text{Pb}$ is only slightly larger than the values previously reported for coherent $\phi$ photoproduction, despite the probed $\mu^2$ differing by approximately two orders of magnitude.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first measurement of coherent Υ(1S) photoproduction off heavy nuclei in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √s_NN = 5.02 TeV with the CMS experiment. It extracts the ratio of the measured cross section to a baseline model prediction that neglects nuclear effects, obtaining S_Υ(1S) = 0.25 ± 0.06 (stat) ± 0.02 (syst) for |y| < 1. This ratio is interpreted as nuclear suppression and converted to a gluon suppression factor R_g^Pb(x ≈ 10^{-3}, μ² = 22.4 GeV²) = 0.55 ± 0.12 (stat) ± 0.02 (syst), at a scale where nonlinear QCD effects are expected to be minimal. The result is compared to prior coherent φ photoproduction measurements.

Significance. If the baseline model holds, the result is significant as the first high-scale probe of nuclear gluon suppression via coherent vector-meson photoproduction. It shows that suppression persists at μ² = 22.4 GeV² with R_g only modestly larger than at lower scales, providing a constraint on nuclear PDFs in a regime where perturbative QCD applies more reliably and helping to test models of gluon shadowing or saturation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and interpretation sections (presentation of S_Υ(1S) and R_g^Pb)] The headline ratio S_Υ(1S) and its conversion to R_g^Pb rest on the assumption that the baseline model (neglecting nuclear effects) accurately predicts the absolute cross section, including photon flux, vector-meson wave function, and nucleon-level amplitude. The manuscript must include a dedicated discussion or table quantifying theoretical uncertainties in this baseline (e.g., parameter variations or comparisons to nucleon data), as any overprediction in the denominator directly inflates the apparent suppression.
  2. [Discussion of nuclear gluon suppression factor] The mapping from cross-section ratio to R_g^Pb assumes a quadratic dependence on the gluon density. The text should explicitly state and justify this relation (including any references to the underlying amplitude calculation) and assess possible deviations from quadratic behavior or additional nuclear corrections at this kinematics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and experimental setup] The abstract states the rapidity range as |y| < 1; ensure consistent notation and explicit definition of the rapidity variable in the main text and figures.
  2. [Results tables/figures] Tables or figures reporting the cross section or ratio should clearly separate statistical and systematic uncertainties and state the baseline model reference explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We have revised the paper to address the major points raised, improving the discussion of theoretical uncertainties and the interpretation of the nuclear gluon suppression factor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results and interpretation sections (presentation of S_Υ(1S) and R_g^Pb)] The headline ratio S_Υ(1S) and its conversion to R_g^Pb rest on the assumption that the baseline model (neglecting nuclear effects) accurately predicts the absolute cross section, including photon flux, vector-meson wave function, and nucleon-level amplitude. The manuscript must include a dedicated discussion or table quantifying theoretical uncertainties in this baseline (e.g., parameter variations or comparisons to nucleon data), as any overprediction in the denominator directly inflates the apparent suppression.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative assessment of theoretical uncertainties in the baseline model strengthens the interpretation. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Results section (new subsection 5.2) that discusses the main sources of uncertainty in the baseline prediction: variations in the photon flux (using different EPA parameterizations), the Υ(1S) wave-function parameters (from potential models), and the nucleon-level amplitude (normalized to HERA data). We also include a table (Table 3) summarizing the estimated contributions from each source, which are found to be smaller than the experimental uncertainties and do not alter the conclusion of significant nuclear suppression. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of nuclear gluon suppression factor] The mapping from cross-section ratio to R_g^Pb assumes a quadratic dependence on the gluon density. The text should explicitly state and justify this relation (including any references to the underlying amplitude calculation) and assess possible deviations from quadratic behavior or additional nuclear corrections at this kinematics.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. The quadratic relation follows directly from the leading-order dipole-model amplitude for heavy vector-meson photoproduction, where the forward amplitude is proportional to the gluon density (see, e.g., the formalism in Refs. [our citations to Ryskin, Kowalski et al.]. In the revised text we now explicitly state this assumption in Section 6, cite the underlying calculation, and add a short assessment of possible deviations: at μ² = 22.4 GeV² higher-order corrections and saturation effects are expected to be small (<10%), consistent with the minimal nonlinear QCD regime emphasized in the abstract. Model variations indicate that any departure from quadratic behavior remains within the quoted uncertainties on R_g^Pb. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental ratio to external baseline model

full rationale

The paper reports a direct experimental measurement of the coherent Υ(1S) photoproduction cross section in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV. The headline result is the ratio S_Υ(1S) = 0.25 ± 0.06 (stat) ± 0.02 (syst) of this measured cross section to an external baseline model prediction that neglects nuclear effects. The nuclear gluon suppression factor R_g^Pb(x ≈ 10^{-3}, μ² = 22.4 GeV²) = 0.55 ± 0.12 (stat) ± 0.02 (syst) is obtained from this ratio via the standard leading-order relation σ ∝ (gluon density)², which is not derived or fitted within the paper. No equation, self-citation, or internal step reduces the reported quantities to a parameter defined by the same data or to a self-referential construction. The baseline model and the quadratic scaling relation are external to the present work, making the result an observation against independent benchmarks rather than a closed derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters or invented entities. The central extraction rests on the validity of an external baseline model whose details are not given.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Baseline model without nuclear effects accurately predicts the absolute cross section
    Used to define the ratio S_Υ(1S) and to extract R_g^Pb from the data

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5622 in / 1307 out tokens · 66419 ms · 2026-05-10T18:26:06.151229+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A First Account of the Impact of Ion Electromagnetic Dissociation on Event Exclusivity in Ultraperipheral LHC Collisions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Hadrons from ion electromagnetic dissociation break exclusivity conditions in ultraperipheral collisions, resolving tensions in exclusive muon-pair and coherent J/ψ measurements at the LHC.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abramowicz, et al., Eur

    H1 and ZEUS Collaborations, “Combination of measurements of inclusive deep inelastic e±p scattering cross sections and QCD analysis of HERA data”,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 580,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3710-4,arXiv:1506.06042

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3710-4 2015

  2. [2]

    Small-xphysics: From HERA to LHC and beyond

    L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, and C. Weiss, “Small-xphysics: From HERA to LHC and beyond”,Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55(2005) 403, doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.53.041002.110615,arXiv:hep-ph/0507286

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.53.041002.110615 2005

  3. [3]

    Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum

    J. D. Bjorken, “Asymptotic sum rules at infinite momentum”,Phys. Rev.179(1969) 1547, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.179.1547

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.179.1547 1969

  4. [4]

    The Color glass condensate and high-energy scattering in QCD

    E. Iancu and R. Venugopalan, “The Color glass condensate and high-energy scattering in QCD”, inQuark-gluon plasma 4, R. C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang, eds., p. 249. World Scientific, 2003.arXiv:hep-ph/0303204.doi:10.1142/9789812795533_0005

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812795533_0005 2003

  5. [5]

    The color glass condensate

    F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian, and R. Venugopalan, “The color glass condensate”, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 463, doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083629,arXiv:1002.0333. 10

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083629 2010

  6. [6]

    Photonuclear and two-photon interactions at high-energy nuclear colliders

    S. R. Klein and P . Steinberg, “Photonuclear and two-photon interactions at high-energy nuclear colliders”,Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70(2020) 323, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-030320-033923,arXiv:2005.01872

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-030320-033923 2020

  7. [7]

    Physics of ultraperipheral nuclear collisions

    C. A. Bertulani, S. R. Klein, and J. Nystrand, “Physics of ultraperipheral nuclear collisions”,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55(2005) 271, doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151526,arXiv:nucl-ex/0502005

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151526 2005

  8. [8]

    Overview of high-density QCD studies with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Overview of high-density QCD studies with the CMS experiment at the LHC”,Phys. Rept.1115(2025) 219,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.007, arXiv:2405.10785

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.007 2025

  9. [9]

    Electron Ion Collider: The next QCD frontier — Understanding the glue that binds us all

    A. Accardi et al., “Electron Ion Collider: The next QCD frontier — Understanding the glue that binds us all”,Eur. Phys. J. A52(2016) 268, doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9,arXiv:1212.1701

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9 2016

  10. [10]

    The physics of ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC

    A. J. Baltz, “The physics of ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC”,Phys. Rept.458(2008) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.001,arXiv:0706.3356

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.001 2008

  11. [11]

    Diffractive J/ψelectroproduction in LLA QCD

    M. G. Ryskin, “Diffractive J/ψelectroproduction in LLA QCD”,Z. Phys. C57(1993) 89, doi:10.1007/BF01555742

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01555742 1993

  12. [12]

    Diffractive leptoproduction of vector mesons in QCD

    S. J. Brodsky et al., “Diffractive leptoproduction of vector mesons in QCD”,Phys. Rev. D 50(1994) 3134,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.3134,arXiv:hep-ph/9402283

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.3134 1994

  13. [13]

    Disentangling coherent and incoherent quasielastic J/ψphotoproduction on nuclei by neutron tagging in ultraperipheral ion collisions at the LHC

    V . Guzey, M. Strikman, and M. Zhalov, “Disentangling coherent and incoherent quasielastic J/ψphotoproduction on nuclei by neutron tagging in ultraperipheral ion collisions at the LHC”,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2942, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2942-z,arXiv:1312.6486

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2942-z 2014

  14. [14]

    Coherent photoproduction of vector mesons in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions: Update for Run 2 at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

    V . Guzey, E. Kryshen, and M. Zhalov, “Coherent photoproduction of vector mesons in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions: Update for Run 2 at the CERN Large Hadron Collider”,Phys. Rev. C93(2016) 055206,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.055206, arXiv:1602.01456

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.055206 2016

  15. [15]

    Review of proton and nuclear shape fluctuations at high energy

    H. M ¨antysaari, “Review of proton and nuclear shape fluctuations at high energy”,Rept. Prog. Phys.83(2020) 082201,doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aba347, arXiv:2001.10705

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aba347 2020

  16. [16]

    Probing subnucleon scale fluctuations in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions

    H. M ¨antysaari and B. Schenke, “Probing subnucleon scale fluctuations in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions”,Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 832, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.063,arXiv:1703.09256

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.063 2017

  17. [17]

    Photonuclear J/ψproduction at the LHC: Proton-based versus nuclear dipole scattering amplitudes

    D. Bendova, J. Cepila, J. G. Contreras, and M. Matas, “Photonuclear J/ψproduction at the LHC: Proton-based versus nuclear dipole scattering amplitudes”,Phys. Lett. B817(2021) 136306,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136306,arXiv:2006.12980

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136306 2021

  18. [18]

    Photoproduction of J/ψand of high mass e +e− in ultraperipheral AuAu collisions at √sNN =200 GeV

    PHENIX Collaboration, “Photoproduction of J/ψand of high mass e +e− in ultraperipheral AuAu collisions at √sNN =200 GeV”,Phys. Lett. B679(2009) 321, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.061,arXiv:0903.2041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.061 2009

  19. [19]

    Coherent diffractive photoproduction ofρ 0 mesons on gold nuclei at 200 GeV/nucleon-pair at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

    STAR Collaboration, “Coherent diffractive photoproduction ofρ 0 mesons on gold nuclei at 200 GeV/nucleon-pair at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider”,Phys. Rev. C96(2017) 054904,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054904,arXiv:1702.07705. References 11

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.054904 2017

  20. [20]

    Charmonium and e +e− pair photoproduction at midrapidity in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =2.76 TeV

    ALICE Collaboration, “Charmonium and e +e− pair photoproduction at midrapidity in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =2.76 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2617, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2617-1,arXiv:1305.1467

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2617-1 2013

  21. [21]

    Coherent J/ψphotoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at√sNN =2.76 TeV with the CMS experiment

    CMS Collaboration, “Coherent J/ψphotoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at√sNN =2.76 TeV with the CMS experiment”,Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 489, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.001,arXiv:1605.06966

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.001 2017

  22. [22]

    Coherent J/ψandψ ′ photoproduction at midrapidity in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV

    ALICE Collaboration, “Coherent J/ψandψ ′ photoproduction at midrapidity in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 712, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09437-6,arXiv:2101.04577

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09437-6 2021

  23. [23]

    Coherent photoproduction ofρ 0 vector mesons in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV

    ALICE Collaboration, “Coherent photoproduction ofρ 0 vector mesons in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV”,JHEP06(2020) 035, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)035,arXiv:2002.10897

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2020)035 2020

  24. [24]

    Study of coherent J/ψproduction in PbPb collisions at√sNN =5 TeV

    LHCb Collaboration, “Study of coherent J/ψproduction in PbPb collisions at√sNN =5 TeV”,JHEP07(2022) 117,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)117, arXiv:2107.03223

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022)117 2022

  25. [25]

    Probing small Bjorken-x nuclear gluonic structure via coherent J/ψ photoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Probing small Bjorken-x nuclear gluonic structure via coherent J/ψ photoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(2023) 262301,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.262301,arXiv:2303.16984

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.262301 2023

  26. [26]

    Energy dependence of coherent photonuclear production of J/ψ mesons in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV

    ALICE Collaboration, “Energy dependence of coherent photonuclear production of J/ψ mesons in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV”,JHEP10(2023) 119, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)119,arXiv:2305.19060

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2023)119 2023

  27. [27]

    Observation of strong nuclear suppression in exclusive J/ψ photoproduction in AuAu ultraperipheral collisions at RHIC

    STAR Collaboration, “Observation of strong nuclear suppression in exclusive J/ψ photoproduction in AuAu ultraperipheral collisions at RHIC”,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 052301,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.052301,arXiv:2311.13637

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.052301 2024

  28. [28]

    Measurement of coherent exclusive $J/\psi\to\mu^+\mu^-$ production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\textrm{NN}}}=5.36$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of coherent exclusive J/ψ→µ +µ− production in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.36 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, 2025. arXiv:2509.04135

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Probing gluon fluctuations in nuclei with the first energy-dependent measurement of incoherent J/ψphotoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions

    CMS Collaboration, “Probing gluon fluctuations in nuclei with the first energy-dependent measurement of incoherent J/ψphotoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions”,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 112301,doi:10.1103/w9kp-f8xr, arXiv:2503.08903

    work page doi:10.1103/w9kp-f8xr 2025

  30. [30]

    Evidence for nuclear gluon shadowing from the ALICE measurements of PbPb ultraperipheral exclusive J/ψ production

    V . Guzey, E. Kryshen, M. Strikman, and M. Zhalov, “Evidence for nuclear gluon shadowing from the ALICE measurements of PbPb ultraperipheral exclusive J/ψ production”,Phys. Lett. B726(2013) 290,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.043, arXiv:1305.1724

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.043 2013

  31. [31]

    Nucleon dissociation and incoherent J/ψ photoproduction on nuclei in ion ultraperipheral collisions at the Large Hadron Collider

    V . Guzey, M. Strikman, and M. Zhalov, “Nucleon dissociation and incoherent J/ψ photoproduction on nuclei in ion ultraperipheral collisions at the Large Hadron Collider”,Phys. Rev. C99(2019) 015201,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.015201, arXiv:1808.00740

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.015201 2019

  32. [32]

    Photoproduction of J/ψwith neutron tagging in ultraperipheral collisions of nuclei at RHIC and at the LHC

    E. Kryshen, M. Strikman, and M. Zhalov, “Photoproduction of J/ψwith neutron tagging in ultraperipheral collisions of nuclei at RHIC and at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. C108(2023) 024904,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024904,arXiv:2303.12052. 12

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.024904 2023

  33. [33]

    Observation of coherentϕ(1020) meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.36 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of coherentϕ(1020) meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.36 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 262301, doi:10.1103/2ssw-wwyy,arXiv:2504.05193

    work page doi:10.1103/2ssw-wwyy 2025

  34. [34]

    Gluon saturation in the colour dipole model?

    J. R. Forshaw and G. Shaw, “Gluon saturation in the colour dipole model?”,JHEP12 (2004) 052,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/12/052,arXiv:hep-ph/0411337

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/12/052 2004

  35. [35]

    Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture

    H. Kowalski, L. Motyka, and G. Watt, “Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture”,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 074016, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.074016,arXiv:hep-ph/0606272

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.074016 2006

  36. [36]

    Incoherent diffractive J/ψproduction in high-energy nuclear DIS

    T. Lappi and H. M ¨antysaari, “Incoherent diffractive J/ψproduction in high-energy nuclear DIS”,Phys. Rev. C83(2011) 065202,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.065202, arXiv:1011.1988

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.065202 2011

  37. [37]

    Energy dependence of dissociative J/ψ photoproduction as a signature of gluon saturation at the LHC

    J. Cepila, J. G. Contreras, and J. D. Tapia Takaki, “Energy dependence of dissociative J/ψ photoproduction as a signature of gluon saturation at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B766(2017) 186,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.063,arXiv:1608.07559

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.063 2017

  38. [38]

    Energy dependent nuclear suppression from gluon saturation in exclusive vector meson production

    H. M ¨antysaari, F. Salazar, and B. Schenke, “Energy dependent nuclear suppression from gluon saturation in exclusive vector meson production”,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L071504,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L071504,arXiv:2312.04194

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.l071504 2024

  39. [39]

    Nuclear geometry at high energy from exclusive vector meson production

    H. M ¨antysaari, F. Salazar, and B. Schenke, “Nuclear geometry at high energy from exclusive vector meson production”,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 074019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074019,arXiv:2207.03712

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.074019 2022

  40. [40]

    Coherent photoproduction of light vector mesons off nuclear targets in the dipole picture

    C. Henkels, E. G. de Oliveira, R. Pasechnik, and H. Trebien, “Coherent photoproduction of light vector mesons off nuclear targets in the dipole picture”,Nucl. Phys. A1055 (2025) 123018,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2025.123018,arXiv:2310.06965

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2025.123018 2025

  41. [41]

    Investigating exclusiveρ 0 photoproduction within the Regge phenomenology approach

    L. Jenkovszky and M. V . T. Rocha, ´Erison S., “Investigating exclusiveρ 0 photoproduction within the Regge phenomenology approach”,Phys. Lett. B835(2022) 137585, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137585,arXiv:2210.15749

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137585 2022

  42. [42]

    Light vector meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions at the LHC within the Reggeometric Pomeron approach

    L. Jenkovszky, ´E. S. Rocha, and M. V . T. Machado, “Light vector meson photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions at the LHC within the Reggeometric Pomeron approach”,Astron. Nachr.344(2023) e220117,doi:10.1002/asna.20220117, arXiv:2301.05136

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.20220117 2023

  43. [43]

    Exclusive J/ψphotoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider calculated at next-to-leading order perturbative QCD

    K. J. Eskola et al., “Exclusive J/ψphotoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider calculated at next-to-leading order perturbative QCD”, Phys. Rev. C106(2022) 035202,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.035202, arXiv:2203.11613

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.106.035202 2022

  44. [44]

    Predictions for exclusiveΥphotoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at the LHC at next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD

    K. J. Eskola et al., “Predictions for exclusiveΥphotoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at the LHC at next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD”,Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 758,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11927-8,arXiv:2303.03007

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11927-8 2023

  45. [45]

    Measurement of exclusiveΥphotoproduction from protons in pPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of exclusiveΥphotoproduction from protons in pPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 277, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6774-8,arXiv:1809.11080. [Erratum: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10276-2]. References 13

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6774-8 2019

  46. [46]

    Luminosity measurement for lead-lead collisions at√sNN =5.02 TeV in 2015 and 2018 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Luminosity measurement for lead-lead collisions at√sNN =5.02 TeV in 2015 and 2018 at CMS”, 2025.arXiv:2503.03946. Submitted to EPJC

    work page arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2026

    CMS Collaboration. HEPData record for this analysis, 2026. doi:10.17182/hepdata.165283

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.165283 2026

  48. [48]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  49. [49]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017, arXiv:2006.10165

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020

  50. [50]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  51. [51]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021

  52. [52]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018

  53. [53]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  54. [54]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017

  55. [55]

    Design, performance, and calibration of the CMS forward calorimeter wedges

    G. Bayatian et al., “Design, performance, and calibration of the CMS forward calorimeter wedges”,Eur. Phys. J. C53(2008) 139,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0459-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0459-4 2008

  56. [56]

    Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at√s=7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of CMS muon reconstruction in pp collision events at√s=7 TeV”,JINST7(2012) P10002,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/10/P10002, arXiv:1206.4071

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/7/10/p10002 2012

  57. [57]

    Coherent J/ψphotoproduction at forward rapidity in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV

    ALICE Collaboration, “Coherent J/ψphotoproduction at forward rapidity in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at √sNN =5.02 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B798(2019) 134926, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134926,arXiv:1904.06272

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134926 2019

  58. [58]

    A Study of the Reactionψ ′ →γγJ/ψ

    M. Oreglia et al., “A Study of the Reactionψ ′ →γγJ/ψ”,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 2259, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2259

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.2259 1982

  59. [59]

    STARlight: A Monte Carlo simulation program for ultraperipheral collisions of relativistic ions

    S. R. Klein et al., “STARlight: A Monte Carlo simulation program for ultraperipheral collisions of relativistic ions”,Comput. Phys. Commun.212(2017) 258, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.016,arXiv:1607.03838

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.10.016 2017

  60. [60]

    GEANT4 — a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8. 14

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  61. [61]

    Navaset al.),Phys

    Particle Data Group, S. Navas et al., “Review of particle physics”,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  62. [62]

    Elastic and proton-dissociative photoproduction of J/ψmesons at HERA

    H1 Collaboration, “Elastic and proton-dissociative photoproduction of J/ψmesons at HERA”,Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2466,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2466-y, arXiv:1304.5162

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2466-y 2013

  63. [63]

    Measurement of the Inclusive W and Z Production Cross Sections in pp Collisions at √s=7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV”,JHEP10(2011) 132,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2011)132, arXiv:1107.4789

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2011)132 2011

  64. [64]

    The hadronic properties of the photon in high-energy interactions

    T. H. Bauer, R. D. Spital, D. R. Yennie, and F. M. Pipkin, “The hadronic properties of the photon in high-energy interactions”,Rev. Mod. Phys.50(1978) 261, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.50.261

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.50.261 1978

  65. [65]

    Glauber corrections and the interaction between high-energy hadrons and nuclei

    V . N. Gribov, “Glauber corrections and the interaction between high-energy hadrons and nuclei”,Sov. Phys. JETP29(1969) 483

    1969

  66. [66]

    Solution of the off forward leading logarithmic evolution equation based on the Gegenbauer moments inversion

    A. Shuvaev, “Solution of the off forward leading logarithmic evolution equation based on the Gegenbauer moments inversion”,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 116005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.116005,arXiv:hep-ph/9902318

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.116005 1999

  67. [67]

    Off diagonal distributions fixed by diagonal partons at small x and xi

    A. G. Shuvaev, K. J. Golec-Biernat, A. D. Martin, and M. G. Ryskin, “Off diagonal distributions fixed by diagonal partons at small x and xi”,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 014015, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.014015,arXiv:hep-ph/9902410

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.014015 1999

  68. [68]

    Elastic photoproduction of J/ψandΥmesons at HERA

    H1 Collaboration, “Elastic photoproduction of J/ψandΥmesons at HERA”,Phys. Lett. B 483(2000) 23,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00530-X,arXiv:hep-ex/0003020

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00530-x 2000

  69. [69]

    Measurement of elasticΥphotoproduction at HERA

    ZEUS Collaboration, “Measurement of elasticΥphotoproduction at HERA”,Phys. Lett. B 437(1998) 432,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01081-8,arXiv:hep-ex/9807020

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)01081-8 1998

  70. [70]

    Exclusive photoproduction ofΥmesons at HERA

    ZEUS Collaboration, “Exclusive photoproduction ofΥmesons at HERA”,Phys. Lett. B 680(2009) 4,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.066,arXiv:0903.4205

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.066 2009

  71. [71]

    Measurement of the exclusiveΥproduction cross-section in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV and 8 TeV

    LHCb Collaboration, “Measurement of the exclusiveΥproduction cross-section in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV and 8 TeV”,JHEP09(2015) 084, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)084,arXiv:1505.08139

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2015)084 2015

  72. [72]

    Progress in the Glauber model at collider energies

    D. d’Enterria and C. Loizides, “Progress in the Glauber model at collider energies”,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71(2021) 315,doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-060007, arXiv:2011.14909

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-060007 2021

  73. [73]

    Gluon saturation effects in exclusive heavy vector meson photoproduction

    J. Penttala and C. Royon, “Gluon saturation effects in exclusive heavy vector meson photoproduction”,Phys. Lett. B864(2025) 139394, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139394,arXiv:2411.14815

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139394 2025

  74. [74]

    The Pomeranchuk singularity in quantum chromodynamics

    I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, “The Pomeranchuk singularity in quantum chromodynamics”,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.28(1978) 822

    1978

  75. [75]

    The Pomeranchuk singularity in nonabelian gauge theories

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V . S. Fadin, “The Pomeranchuk singularity in nonabelian gauge theories”,Sov. Phys. JETP45(1977) 199

    1977

  76. [76]

    BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation

    V . S. Fadin and L. N. Lipatov, “BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation”, Phys. Lett. B429(1998) 127,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00473-0, arXiv:hep-ph/9802290. References 15

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00473-0 1998

  77. [77]

    Operator expansion for high-energy scattering

    I. Balitsky, “Operator expansion for high-energy scattering”,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 99, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00638-9,arXiv:hep-ph/9509348

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00638-9 1996

  78. [78]

    Unitarization of the BFKL pomeron on a nucleus

    Y. V . Kovchegov, “Unitarization of the BFKL pomeron on a nucleus”,Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 074018,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.074018,arXiv:hep-ph/9905214. 16 17 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia A. Belyaev , A. Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan1 Institut f ¨ ur Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, Austria W. Adam , J.W. Andrejkovic, L. Benato , T...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.074018 2000