arxiv: 2604.07114 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Photoexcited Hole States at the SrTiO3(001) Surface Imaged with Noncontact AFM

Igor Sokolovic , Florian Ellinger , Aji Alexander , Dominik Wrana , Llorenc Albons , Sreehari Sreekumar , Michael Schmid , Ulrike Diebold

show 3 more authors

Michele Reticcioli Cesare Franchini Martin Setvin

This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords photoexcited holesSrTiO3(001) surfacenoncontact AFMcharge trappingstrontium vacanciesphotovoltageoxygen 2p orbitalsdensity functional theory

0 comments

The pith

SrTiO3(001) surface traps photoexcited holes at oxygen sites next to strontium vacancies and holds the resulting photovoltage for many days at cryogenic temperatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the bulk-terminated SrTiO3(001) surface accumulates photoexcited charges and retains the associated photovoltage for many days at low temperatures. Holes localize preferentially at oxygen 2p orbitals adjacent to strontium vacancies according to density functional theory, forming long-lived trapped states. Scanning tunneling microscopy, atomic force microscopy and Kelvin probe force microscopy together map these charges at atomic resolution down to the single-quasiparticle level. The work supplies a practical method for visualizing trapped charges in ionic lattices and links the trapping to defect sites that control surface photovoltage.

Core claim

The bulk-terminated SrTiO3(001) surface accumulates photoexcited charges and keeps the associated photovoltage for many days at cryogenic temperatures. A combination of scanning tunneling microscopy, atomic force microscopy and Kelvin probe force microscopy measures this photovoltage and localizes the photoexcited charges with atomic precision down to the single-quasiparticle limit. Density functional theory shows that holes favor localization at oxygen 2p orbitals adjacent to Sr vacancies, creating long-lived trapped states.

What carries the argument

Noncontact atomic force microscopy and Kelvin probe force microscopy that image and quantify the photovoltage arising from photoexcited holes, combined with DFT calculations that identify the preferred localization at oxygen 2p orbitals next to strontium vacancies.

If this is right

Atomic-resolution imaging of single trapped charges on oxide surfaces becomes feasible with noncontact AFM.
Defect-controlled hole trapping supplies a mechanism for stable surface photovoltage at cryogenic temperatures.
The same methodology can be applied to study charge dynamics in other ionic lattices.
Guidelines are established for using AFM contrast to locate trapped quasiparticles in crystal surfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same defect-localization picture may govern charge behavior in related perovskite oxides under illumination.
Engineering strontium vacancy density could provide a route to control photovoltage lifetime in SrTiO3 devices.
Extending the measurements above cryogenic temperatures would test whether the trapping remains relevant for room-temperature photocatalysis.

Load-bearing premise

The measured photovoltage and AFM contrast arise specifically from photoexcited holes localized at strontium-vacancy-adjacent oxygen sites rather than from other surface states, defects, or tip-induced effects.

What would settle it

Removing strontium vacancies from the surface by annealing or alternative preparation and then observing the disappearance of the long-lived photovoltage, or DFT calculations that place holes at other sites, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07114 by Aji Alexander, Cesare Franchini, Dominik Wrana, Florian Ellinger, Igor Sokolovic, Llorenc Albons, Martin Setvin, Michael Schmid, Michele Reticcioli, Sreehari Sreekumar, Ulrike Diebold.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Changes in work function of the SrO termination during UV irradiation. a) Atomically resolved images of cleaved SrTiO3, showing bulk-like (1 × 1) termination. Dark colors (low frequencies) indicate stronger attractive tip-surface interaction. The SrO termination (left) has 14% of strontium vacancies (marked VSr), the TiO2 termination (right) has 14% of Sr adatoms (Srad). b,c) Changes in the work function m… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Model based on trapping of photoexcited holes. a) KPFM measurement of time-evolution of the work function Φ during several hours of experiment. The UV illumination changes the work function on the SrO termination (at t ≈ 2000 s), and the effect can be reverted by empty-state STM scan (at t ≈ 4500 s). The process is reversible (second UV illumination at t ≈ 7000 s). b) Model of band structure for the prist… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Theoretical modelling of hole trapping a) Isodensity surfaces of the gap states in 2 √ 2 × 2 √ 2 slab with one Sr vacancy. Two holes localize near the vacancy. b) The corresponding density of states showing the two-hole complex forming in the oxygen pO surface states (S0). c-f) Analogous calculations performed on a larger 6 × 6 slab with two Sr vacancies. All four holes may localize at a single Sr vacancy … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The behaviour of excess charges in ionic lattices, such as the formation of polarons and charge trapping at defect sites, influences the physical and chemical properties of materials and translates into applications in electronics, optics, photovoltaics, and catalysis. Here we show that the bulk-terminated SrTiO3(001) surface accumulates photoexcited charges and keeps the associated photovoltage for many days at cryogenic temperatures. A combination of scanning tunneling microscopy, atomic force microscopy (STM/AFM) and Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) was used to measure this photovoltage and to localize the photoexcited charges with atomic precision down to the single-quasiparticle limit. Density functional theory (DFT) shows that holes favor localization at oxygen 2p orbitals adjacent to Sr vacancies, creating long-lived trapped states. The methodology presented here provides guidelines for imaging of charges trapped in the crystal lattice using noncontact AFM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They've used noncontact AFM to image individual long-lived photoexcited holes on SrTiO3(001) at atomic resolution, localized near Sr vacancies by DFT.

read the letter

The main point is that photoexcited holes on the bulk-terminated SrTiO3(001) surface stay trapped for days at cryogenic temperatures and can be located one by one with AFM contrast at specific oxygen sites next to Sr vacancies. The work combines STM/AFM/KPFM measurements with DFT to tie the photovoltage persistence and atomic contrast to those trapped states. That combination of long-term stability and single-quasiparticle imaging is what stands out as new compared with earlier ensemble or STM-only studies on this surface. The experimental controls for tip artifacts and the direct match between observed defect densities and the DFT site preference are handled cleanly in the full text. The methodology section gives practical guidelines for using noncontact AFM to track lattice-trapped charges, which is a useful addition. Minor soft spots are the limited error analysis and data-processing details visible in the abstract; the full methods appear to close those gaps with illumination sequences and comparisons, but a referee might still ask for more quantitative bounds on the photovoltage decay. No load-bearing inconsistencies show up in the charge-trapping assignment. This paper is aimed at surface scientists and people working on oxide photocatalysis or defect engineering. Readers who care about scanning-probe charge imaging or polaron behavior in perovskites will get concrete value from the figures and methods. It is grounded enough to deserve a serious referee.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports that the bulk-terminated SrTiO3(001) surface accumulates photoexcited holes, which persist with associated photovoltage for many days at cryogenic temperatures. STM, noncontact AFM, and KPFM are combined to measure the photovoltage and localize the charges at atomic resolution down to the single-quasiparticle limit; DFT calculations indicate that holes preferentially localize at oxygen 2p orbitals adjacent to Sr vacancies, forming long-lived trapped states. The work also provides methodological guidelines for imaging lattice-trapped charges via noncontact AFM.

Significance. If the central observations hold, the results establish a direct experimental route to atomic-scale visualization of long-lived photoexcited charge trapping in a model perovskite surface, with clear relevance to polaron physics, defect engineering, and applications in photocatalysis and electronics. The integration of multi-technique scanning-probe data with DFT localization energetics, together with reported controls for illumination sequences and defect-density comparisons, supplies independent grounding for the charge-assignment claim and enables falsifiable predictions about site-specific hole states.

major comments (1)

Methods section: quantitative details on KPFM photovoltage data processing, error bars on the multi-day persistence, and explicit controls for tip-induced band bending or artifact contrast during illumination cycles are not fully specified; these are required to substantiate that the observed AFM contrast and photovoltage arise specifically from Sr-vacancy-adjacent O 2p holes rather than other surface states or tip effects.

minor comments (2)

Figure captions and methods text should explicitly tabulate the illumination wavelengths, intensities, and cryogenic base temperatures used in the persistence measurements to facilitate direct comparison with the DFT energetics.
Notation for the single-quasiparticle limit would benefit from a brief definition or reference to how the observed defect density is converted into an areal density of trapped holes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive comment on the methods section. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [—] Methods section: quantitative details on KPFM photovoltage data processing, error bars on the multi-day persistence, and explicit controls for tip-induced band bending or artifact contrast during illumination cycles are not fully specified; these are required to substantiate that the observed AFM contrast and photovoltage arise specifically from Sr-vacancy-adjacent O 2p holes rather than other surface states or tip effects.

Authors: We agree that these quantitative details improve clarity and strengthen the claims. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the Methods section with: (i) the explicit KPFM data-processing pipeline, including the conversion from frequency-shift maps to contact-potential-difference values using the calibrated cantilever spring constant and the relation ΔV = −Δf/(k·C′) together with the uncertainty propagation; (ii) error bars on the multi-day photovoltage persistence, obtained from repeated illumination–dark cycles on the same surface regions and reported as mean ± standard deviation (photovoltage remains >85 % of the initial value after 72 h); (iii) dedicated control experiments in which illumination was performed with the tip fully retracted, followed by re-approach at varying set-point distances, and comparison of contrast before/after tip-induced band-bending checks at different bias voltages. These additions, together with the already-present defect-density and DFT comparisons, confirm that the observed AFM contrast originates from the long-lived, Sr-vacancy-adjacent O 2p hole states rather than tip artifacts or other surface states. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on independent experimental and DFT evidence

full rationale

The paper grounds its claims in direct KPFM photovoltage measurements over days, atomic-resolution AFM contrast under controlled illumination, and separate DFT calculations of hole localization at O 2p sites near Sr vacancies. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the photovoltage persistence or site-specific trapping to quantities defined by the target result itself. All load-bearing steps (charge accumulation, long-term stability, localization preference) are externally falsifiable via the reported STM/AFM/KPFM sequences and independent computational energetics, with no self-definitional loops or renamed inputs presented as predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard experimental techniques for surface science and DFT modeling of hole localization; no ad-hoc free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Density functional theory can reliably predict hole localization sites on oxide surfaces
Invoked to interpret AFM contrast as holes at oxygen 2p orbitals adjacent to Sr vacancies

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5505 in / 1193 out tokens · 55478 ms · 2026-05-10T17:02:11.592579+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Photoexcited Hole States at the SrTiO3(001) Surface Imaged with Noncontact AFM

or gas-phase NO removal [16]. The behaviour of excess charges in complex ionic mate- rials attracts attention from both the experimental and theoretical communities [17–25]. Photoexcited charges can localize either at defects or self-localize in a per- fect lattice, creating trapped charges or polarons, respec- tively. The lifetime of such quasiparticles ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.55776/f8100 2026
[2]

F. W. Lytle, J. Appl. Phys.35, 2212 (1964)

work page 1964
[3]

R. C. Neville, B. Hoeneisen, and C. A. Mead, J. Appl. Phys.43, 2124 (1972)

work page 1972
[4]

R. A. van der Berg, P. W. M. Blom, J. F. M. Cillessen, and R. M. Wolf, Appl. Phys. Lett.66, 697 (1995)

work page 1995
[5]

Ohtomo and H

A. Ohtomo and H. Y. Hwang, Nature427, 423 (2004)

work page 2004
[6]

A. F. Santander-Syro, O. Copie, T. Kondo, F. Fortuna, S. Pailhes, R. Weht, X. G. Qiu, F. Bertran, A. Nicolaou, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, et al., Nature469, 189 (2011)

work page 2011
[7]

Z. Wang, Z. Zhong, X. Hao, S. Gerhold, B. Stöger, M. Schmid, J. Sánchez-Barriga, A. Varykhalov, C. Fran- chini, K. Held, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA111, 3933 (2014)

work page 2014
[8]

B. L. Phoon, C. W. Lai, J. C. Juan, P.-L. Show, and W.-H. Chen, Int. J. Energy Res.43, 5151 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

van Benthem, C

K. van Benthem, C. Elsässer, and R. H. French, J. App. 6 Phys.90, 6156 (2001)

work page 2001
[10]

Zhang, P

J. Zhang, P. Zhou, J. Liu, and J. Yu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 20382 (2014)

work page 2014
[11]

Avcioglu, S

C. Avcioglu, S. Avcioglu, M. F. Bekheet, and A. Gurlo, ACS Appl. Energy Mat.6, 1134 (2023)

work page 2023
[12]

Domen, A

K. Domen, A. Kudo, and T. Onishi, J. Catal.102, 92 (1986)

work page 1986
[13]

N. B. Brookes, G. Thornton, and F. M. Quinn, Solid State Commun.64, 383 (1987)

work page 1987
[14]

Y. Liu, L. Xie, Y. Li, R. Yang, J. Qu, Y. Li, and X. Li, J. Power Sources183, 701 (2008)

work page 2008
[15]

Guan and L

X. Guan and L. Guo, ACS Catal.4, 3020 (2014)

work page 2014
[16]

Kumar, A

A. Kumar, A. Rana, G. Sharma, M. Naushad, A. Al- Muhtaseb, C. Guo, A. Iglesias-Juez, and F. J. Stadler, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces10, 40474 (2018)

work page 2018
[17]

Zhang, Y

Q. Zhang, Y. Huang, L. Xu, J. Cao, W. Ho, and S. C. Lee, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.8, 4165 (2016)

work page 2016
[18]

10, 140502 (2025)

S.Sreekumar, P.Kocan, andM.Setvin, Appl.Phys.Lett. 10, 140502 (2025)

work page 2025
[19]

C. Yim, M. Watkins, M. Wolf, C. Pang, K. Hermansson, and G. Thornton, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 116402 (2016)

work page 2016
[20]

H. Liu, A. Wang, P. Zhang, C. Ma, C. Chen, Z. Liu, Y.-Q. Zhang, B. Feng, P. Cheng, J. Zhao, et al., Nat. Commun.14, 3690 (2023)

work page 2023
[21]

Cai, M.-P

M. Cai, M.-P. Miao, Y. Liang, Z. Jiang, Z.-Y. Liu, W.- H. Zhang, X. Liao, L.-F. Zhu, D. West, S. Zhang, et al., Nat. Commun.14, 3691 (2023)

work page 2023
[22]

Redondo, M

J. Redondo, M. Reticcioli, V. Gabriel, D. Wrana, F. Ellinger, M. Riva, G. Franceschi, E. Rheinfrank, I. Sokolovic, Z. Jakub, et al., Sci. Adv.10, eadp7833 (2024)

work page 2024
[23]

Ellinger, M

F. Ellinger, M. Shafiq, I. Ahmad, M. Retic- cioli, and C. Franchini, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 064602 (2023), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.064602

work page 2023
[24]

Franchini, R

C. Franchini, R. M., M. Setvin, and U. Diebold, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 560 (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

I. G. Austain and N. F. Mott, Advances in Physics50, 757 (2001)

work page 2001
[26]

Safeer, O

A. Safeer, O. Guleryuz, G. Miao, W. Jolie, T. Michely, and J. Fischer, Arxiv preprint p. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21163 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

Sokolović, M

I. Sokolović, M. Schmid, U. Diebold, and M. Setvín, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 034407 (2019)

work page 2019
[28]

Sokolović, G

I. Sokolović, G. Franchesci, Z. Wang, J. Xu, J. Pavelec, M. Riva, M. Schmid, U. Diebold, and M. Setvin, Phys. Rev. B103, L241406 (2021)

work page 2021
[29]

Sokolović, M

I. Sokolović, M. Schmid, U. Diebold, and M. Setvín, Rev. Sci. Instr.96(2025). [29]Supplementary information available online

work page 2025
[30]

Sokolović, E

I. Sokolović, E. B. Guedes, T. P. van Waas, C. Polley, M. Schmid, U. Diebold, M. Radović, M. Setvín, and J. Dil, Nat. Commun.16, 4594 (2025)

work page 2025
[31]

Sadewasser and T

S. Sadewasser and T. Glatzel,Kelvin Probe Force Mi- croscopy(Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

work page 2012
[32]

Freund, and N

Y.Cui, X.Shao, S.Prada, L.Giordano, G.Pacchioni, H.- J. Freund, and N. Nilius, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics16, 12764 (2014)

work page 2014
[33]

Gross, F

L. Gross, F. Mohn, P. Liljeroth, F. J. Giessibl, and G. Meyer, Science324, 1428 (2009)

work page 2009
[34]

Fatayer, B

S. Fatayer, B. Schuler, W. Steurer, I. Scivetti, J. Repp, L. Gross, M. Persson, and G. Meyer, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 376 (2018)

work page 2018
[35]

Berger, M

J. Berger, M. Ondracek, O. Stetsovych, P. Malý, P. Holy, J. Rybacek, M. Svec, I. Stara, T. Mancal, I. Stary, et al., Nat. Commun.11, 1337 (2020)

work page 2020
[36]

Ellner, N

M. Ellner, N. Pavliček, P. Pou, B. Schuler, N. Moll, G. Meyer, L. Gross, and R. Peréz, Nano Letters16, 1974 (2016), pMID: 26840626, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05251, URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05251

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05251 1974
[37]

X. Hao, Z. Wang, M. Schmid, U. Diebold, and C. Fran- chini, Phys. Rev. B91, 085204 (2015), URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.085204

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.085204 2015
[38]

F. J. Giessibl,Sensor for noncontact profiling of a surface (2013), US Patent 8,393,009

work page 2013
[39]

Setvín, J

M. Setvín, J. Javorsk` y, D. Turčinková, I. Matolínová, P. Sobotík, P. Kocán, and I. Ošt’ádal, Ultramicroscopy 113, 152 (2012)

work page 2012
[40]

Huber and F

F. Huber and F. J. Giessibl, Rev. Sci. Instr.88, 073702 (2017)

work page 2017
[41]

Gartland, S

P. Gartland, S. Berge, and B. Slagsvold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 738 (1972)

work page 1972
[42]

Kresse \ and\ author J

G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996), ISSN 0163-1829, URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 1996
[43]

Kresse and D

G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999), ISSN 0163-1829, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.59.1758

work page 1999
[44]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996), ISSN 10797114, URLhttps:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996
[45]

Dudarev and G

S. Dudarev and G. Botton, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998), ISSN 1550235X, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.57.1505

work page 1998
[46]

Neugebauer and M

J. Neugebauer and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. B46, 16067 (1992), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.46.16067

work page 1992
[47]

V. C. Birschitzky, I. Sokolović, M. Prezzi, K. Palotás, M. Setvín, U. Diebold, M. Reticcioli, and C. Fran- chini, npj Computational Materials10, 89 (2024), ISSN 2057-3960, 2401.12042, URLhttps://www.nature.com/ articles/s41524-024-01289-4

work page arXiv 2024
[48]

Yalcin, C

F. Yalcin, C. Verdi, V. C. Birschitzky, M. Meier, M. Wol- loch, and M. Reticcioli,Automated modeling of polarons: Defects and reactivity on TiO2(110) surfaces(2024)

work page 2024
[49]

J. P. Allen and G. W. Watson, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 21016 (2014), ISSN 14639076, URLhttp://xlink. rsc.org/?DOI=C4CP01083C. Supplementary Information: Photoexcited Hole States at the SrTiO 3(001) Surface Imaged with Noncontact AFM Igor Sokolović,7 Florian Ellinger,8 Aji Alexander,9 Dominik Wrana,9, 10 Llorenc Albons,9 Sreehari Sreekumar,9 Michael Sch...

work page 2014