pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07726 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Unveiling Inner Shadows and Polarization Signatures of Rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Black Holes

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords black hole shadowpolarization imagesEinstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravityaccretion diskray-tracinginner shadowrotating black holesmodified gravity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Combining accretion disk shadows and polarization images more effectively reveals the optical properties of rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper numerically computes shadow and polarization images of rotating black holes in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity by tracing light rays backward from a distant observer through a thin accretion disk. It demonstrates that the inner shadow shrinks in size as the Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant increases, deforms strongly with viewing angle, and changes shape with black hole spin. Polarization intensity tracks the disk brightness, yet the polarization direction near the inner shadow and photon ring shifts markedly with the coupling constant. A sympathetic reader would care because these dual signatures supply an extra observable for testing deviations from general relativity in strong gravity. The work argues that analyzing both image types together uncovers spacetime structure details more effectively than either method alone.

Core claim

Based on the backward ray-tracing method, rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes produce inner shadows whose size decreases only with the Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant while spin and inclination alter the shape; the photon ring responds most to inclination. Polarization intensity follows the accretion disk pattern, but polarization direction near the inner shadow and photon ring changes significantly with the coupling constant. The simultaneous combination and synergistic analysis of both accretion disk and polarization images more profoundly reveals the optical properties of rotating EGB black holes than reliance on either alone.

What carries the argument

Backward ray-tracing through a thin accretion disk model, which generates both the inner shadow morphology and the polarization direction map sensitive to the Gauss-Bonnet coupling.

If this is right

  • The inner shadow size decreases only with increasing Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant ξ.
  • Spin parameter a changes the inner shadow shape but not its size.
  • Observation inclination angle θ_o deforms the inner shadow and affects the photon ring more than ξ or a does.
  • Polarization direction near the inner shadow and photon ring changes significantly with ξ.
  • The combination of disk and polarization images supplies a stronger basis for identifying rotating EGB black holes than either image type alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If observed, the polarization shift could serve as an independent check on spacetime parameters inferred from shadow size alone.
  • Similar combined imaging might help test other higher-curvature gravity models by extracting extra information from polarization data.
  • Discrepancies between measured shadow size and polarization patterns could point to limitations in the thin-disk assumption or the chosen metric.

Load-bearing premise

The thin-disk model and the specific rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet metric accurately determine polarization patterns without major contamination from disk turbulence or radiative transfer details.

What would settle it

High-resolution observations of a supermassive black hole in which polarization direction near the photon ring stays fixed while shadow size varies in a manner inconsistent with the predicted dependence on the Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07726 by Bing-Bing Chen, Chen-Yu Yang, Deyou Chen, Ke-Jian He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Shadow images of rotating EGB black holes with a thin accretion disk with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The lensing bands of rotating EGB black holes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Shadow images of rotating EGB black holes with a thin accretion disk with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The lensing bands of rotating EGB black holes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Intensity cuts along the X-axis for θo = 0◦ . 5 Polarization Images of EGB black hole 5.1 The Propagation of Polarization Vector To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the feature of the rotating EGB spacetime, this section investigates their polarization images within the thin accretion disk model. We assume that the source of polarized radiation is synchrotron emission produced by electrons in the… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Polarization images of rotating EGB black holes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Polarization images of rotating EGB black holes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Based on the backward ray-tracing method, this paper numerically investigates the shadow and polarization images of rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet (EGB) black hole within the framework of a thin disk model. We systematically analyze the effects of the main model parameters and the observation inclination angle $\theta_o$ on both types of images. The results show that, as an intrinsic property of the black hole, the inner shadow undergoes significant deformation with increasing $\theta_o$. The increase of the GB coupling constant $\xi$ only reduces the size of the inner shadow, while the spin parameter a does not alter its size but also its shape. And, the photon ring is more sensitive to variations in $\theta_o$, while it is less affected by $\xi$ and $a$. For polarization images, the influence of $\xi$ on the polarization intensity is generally consistent with that observed in the accretion disk images. However, the polarization direction near the region of the inner shadow and photon ring changes significantly with $\xi$. This feature can provide an additional and effective observational tool for extracting information about the spacetime structure in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet (EGB) gravity. Finally, we conclude that, compared to previous reliance on either accretion disk or polarization images alone, the simultaneous combination and synergistic analysis of both can more profoundly reveal the optical properties of rotating EGB black holes, providing a stronger theoretical basis for identifying such black holes through future high-resolution observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper numerically investigates the shadow and polarization images of rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes using backward ray-tracing in a thin disk model. It analyzes the effects of spin parameter a, Gauss-Bonnet coupling ξ, and observer inclination θ_o on the inner shadow, photon ring, and polarization properties. The results indicate that the inner shadow size decreases with increasing ξ, its shape changes with a, and it deforms with θ_o. Polarization direction near the inner shadow and photon ring varies significantly with ξ. The paper concludes that the combined analysis of accretion disk and polarization images provides a stronger probe of the rotating EGB spacetime than either alone.

Significance. If the numerical computations are accurate, this study adds to the understanding of observational signatures in modified gravity by showing how polarization can complement intensity images in revealing spacetime properties. The systematic parameter exploration is a strength, potentially aiding in the interpretation of future observations. Credit is given for the forward simulation approach without circular fitting. However, the significance is tempered by the lack of validation details.

major comments (2)
  1. The abstract reports numerical results on parameter dependence but provides no error bars, convergence tests, or comparison to the Kerr limit (ξ=0). This undermines confidence in the claimed sensitivities of the inner shadow to ξ and polarization direction to ξ, as these could be affected by numerical artifacts in the ray-tracing.
  2. The conclusion that synergistic analysis of both image types is superior is not supported by an explicit joint analysis or quantitative comparison showing reduced degeneracies; the effects are presented separately for disk images and polarization images.
minor comments (1)
  1. The thin disk model assumptions and ray-tracing implementation details should be stated more explicitly to allow reproducibility and assessment of the polarization calculation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the numerical validation and the support for our conclusions on synergistic analysis.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The abstract reports numerical results on parameter dependence but provides no error bars, convergence tests, or comparison to the Kerr limit (ξ=0). This undermines confidence in the claimed sensitivities of the inner shadow to ξ and polarization direction to ξ, as these could be affected by numerical artifacts in the ray-tracing.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and main text would benefit from explicit validation details. The ray-tracing implementation follows standard backward integration methods used in the literature, but to directly address the concern we will add a new subsection on Numerical Methods. This will include: (1) direct comparisons of the ξ=0 limit to established Kerr results for both shadow size and polarization patterns, confirming agreement within numerical precision; (2) convergence tests varying ray density, integration tolerance, and grid resolution, demonstrating that reported quantities (inner shadow radius and polarization angle) stabilize to better than 1%; (3) a brief note on the deterministic nature of the computation, where uncertainties arise primarily from discretization rather than statistical error bars. We will also revise the abstract to mention consistency with the Kerr limit. These changes will substantiate that the sensitivities to ξ are physical rather than artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The conclusion that synergistic analysis of both image types is superior is not supported by an explicit joint analysis or quantitative comparison showing reduced degeneracies; the effects are presented separately for disk images and polarization images.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the current results are shown separately. Our claim of synergy rests on the distinct responses: ξ primarily shrinks the inner shadow in intensity images while producing a clear shift in polarization direction near the shadow and photon ring. To make this quantitative, we will add a dedicated paragraph in the Discussion section that performs an explicit joint comparison using the existing parameter scans. Specifically, we will illustrate how the allowed range of ξ (and a) consistent with observed shadow size is further narrowed when the polarization angle must also match, providing a simple estimate of the reduction in parameter degeneracy. This addition will be based on the data already computed and will directly support the conclusion without requiring new simulations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper performs numerical backward ray-tracing on a fixed rotating EGB metric (imported from prior literature) and a standard thin-disk emissivity model to generate shadow and polarization images for varying parameters (a, ξ, θ_o). No parameters are fitted to data, no predictions are made that reduce to the inputs by construction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are smuggled via self-citation. The central claim—that joint disk+polarization analysis is more informative—is an interpretive conclusion drawn from the distinct numerical sensitivities observed in the computed images, not a tautological re-expression of the inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained forward simulation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on (1) the rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet metric taken from earlier analytic work, (2) the thin-disk approximation for the accretion flow, and (3) the validity of backward ray-tracing for both intensity and Stokes parameters. No new entities are postulated and no parameters are fitted to observations.

free parameters (3)
  • spin parameter a
    Varied parametrically in the numerical survey; controls frame-dragging and shadow shape.
  • Gauss-Bonnet coupling ξ
    Varied parametrically; controls the size of the inner shadow and polarization twist.
  • observer inclination θ_o
    Varied parametrically; controls projected deformation of the shadow.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The spacetime is described by the rotating Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet metric derived in prior literature.
    Invoked throughout the ray-tracing; the paper does not re-derive the metric.
  • domain assumption The accretion flow can be modeled as a geometrically thin, optically thick disk with prescribed emissivity.
    Used to generate the source images before ray-tracing.
  • standard math Backward ray-tracing with the standard null geodesic equations yields accurate intensity and polarization maps.
    Core numerical method; assumes vacuum propagation outside the disk.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5574 in / 1734 out tokens · 52294 ms · 2026-05-10T17:54:26.623847+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Polarized Equatorial Emission around Kerr Black Holes with Synchronized Scalar Hair. I. Direct images

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Polarization maps of direct images from scalar-hairy Kerr black holes exhibit dephasing in the polarization-vector twist (larger for weakly scalarized cases) and a reversal for vertical magnetic fields at high inclinations.

  2. Reshaping the inner shadow of a Kerr black hole by a torn accretion disk

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Torn accretion disks around Kerr black holes erode the inner shadow and create bifurcated, crescent, and multi-ring shadow features driven by sub-disk discontinuities and outer tilt angle.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review,

    P.V.P. Cunha and C.A.R. Herdeiro,Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review, Gen. Rel. Grav.50(2018) 42 [1801.00860]

  2. [2]

    Viewing the Shadow of the Black Hole at the Galactic Center

    H. Falcke, F. Melia and E. Agol,Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center, Astrophys. J. Lett.528(2000) L13 [astro-ph/9912263]

  3. [3]

    Zeng, K.-J

    X.-X. Zeng, K.-J. He, G.-P. Li, E.-W. Liang and S. Guo,QED and accretion flow models effect on optical appearance of Euler–Heisenberg black holes,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 764 [2209.05938]

  4. [4]

    Zeng, K.-J

    X.-X. Zeng, K.-J. He and G.-P. Li,Effects of dark matter on shadows and rings of Brane-World black holes illuminated by various accretions,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65(2022) 290411 [2111.05090]

  5. [5]

    Black Hole Shadows, Photon Rings, and Lensing Rings

    S.E. Gralla, D.E. Holz and R.M. Wald,Black Hole Shadows, Photon Rings, and Lensing Rings, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 024018 [1906.00873]

  6. [6]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani,Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,Living Rev. Rel.22(2019) 4 [1904.05363]

  7. [7]

    Blandford and R.L

    R.D. Blandford and R.L. Znajek,Electromagnetic extractions of energy from Kerr black holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.179(1977) 433

  8. [8]

    Shakura and R.A

    N.I. Shakura and R.A. Sunyaev,Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance, Astron. Astrophys.24(1973) 337

  9. [9]

    Lightman and D.M

    A.P. Lightman and D.M. Eardley,Black Holes in Binary Systems: Instability of Disk Accretion, Astrophys. J. Lett.187(1974) L1

  10. [10]

    Luminet,Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk,Astron

    J.P. Luminet,Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk,Astron. Astrophys.75 (1979) 228

  11. [11]

    Beckwith and C

    K. Beckwith and C. Done,Extreme gravitational lensing near rotating black holes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.359(2005) 1217 [astro-ph/0411339]

  12. [12]

    Narayan, M.D

    R. Narayan, M.D. Johnson and C.F. Gammie,The Shadow of a Spherically Accreting Black Hole,Astrophys. J. Lett.885(2019) L33 [1910.02957]

  13. [13]

    Zeng, H.-Q

    X.-X. Zeng, H.-Q. Zhang and H. Zhang,Shadows and photon spheres with spherical accretions in the four-dimensional Gauss–Bonnet black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 872 [2004.12074]. 18

  14. [14]

    Heydari-Fard, M

    M. Heydari-Fard, M. Heydari-Fard and N. Riazi,Shadows and photon rings of a spherically accreting Kehagias–Sfetsos black hole,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32(2023) 2350088 [2307.01529]

  15. [15]

    Li, H.-B

    G.-P. Li, H.-B. Zheng, K.-J. He and Q.-Q. Jiang,The shadow and observational images of the non-singular rotating black holes in loop quantum gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 249 [2410.17295]

  16. [16]

    Zeng, G.-P

    X.-X. Zeng, G.-P. Li and K.-J. He,The shadows and observational appearance of a noncommutative black hole surrounded by various profiles of accretions,Nucl. Phys. B974 (2022) 115639 [2106.14478]

  17. [17]

    Shadows and rings of the Kehagias-Sfetsos black hole surrounded by thin disk accretion,

    G.-P. Li and K.-J. He,Shadows and rings of the Kehagias-Sfetsos black hole surrounded by thin disk accretion,JCAP06(2021) 037 [2105.08521]

  18. [18]

    Yang, K.-J

    C.-Y. Yang, K.-J. He, X.-X. Zeng and L.-F. Li,Observational signatures and polarized images of rotating charged black holes in Kalb-Ramond Gravity,2508.07393

  19. [19]

    Shadow images of Ghosh-Kumar rotating black hole illuminated by spherical light sources and thin accretion disks,

    C.-Y. Yang, M.I. Aslam, X.-X. Zeng and R. Saleem,Shadow images of Ghosh-Kumar rotating black hole illuminated by spherical light sources and thin accretion disks,JHEAp46(2025) 345 [2411.11807]

  20. [20]

    Zhang, S

    Z. Zhang, S. Chen and J. Jing,Images of Kerr-MOG black holes surrounded by geometrically thick magnetized equilibrium tori,JCAP09(2024) 027 [2404.12223]

  21. [21]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Hou, M. Guo and B. Chen,Imaging thick accretion disks and jets surrounding black holes,JCAP05(2024) 032 [2401.14794]

  22. [22]

    Gjorgjieski, J

    K. Gjorgjieski, J. Kunz and P. Nedkova,Comparison of magnetized thick disks around black holes and boson stars,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 286 [2401.13857]

  23. [23]

    Constraining a modified gravity theory in strong gravitational lensing and black hole shadow observations,

    X.-M. Kuang, Z.-Y. Tang, B. Wang and A. Wang,Constraining a modified gravity theory in strong gravitational lensing and black hole shadow observations,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 064012 [2206.05878]

  24. [24]

    Li, M.-Q

    G.-P. Li, M.-Q. Wu, K.-J. He and Q.-Q. Jiang,Observational features of massive boson stars with thin disk accretion,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 043009 [2505.14734]

  25. [25]

    Images and flares of geodesic hot spots around a Kerr black hole,

    J. Huang, Z. Zhang, M. Guo and B. Chen,Images and flares of geodesic hot spots around a Kerr black hole,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 124062 [2402.16293]

  26. [26]

    T.-C. Lee, Z. Hu, M. Guo and B. Chen,Circular orbits and polarized images of charged particles orbiting a Kerr black hole with a weak magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 024008 [2211.04143]

  27. [27]

    Y. Hou, J. Huang, M. Guo, Y. Mizuno and B. Chen,Near-horizon Polarization as a Diagnostic of Black Hole Spacetime,Astrophys. J. Lett.988(2025) L51 [2409.07248]

  28. [28]

    Y. Chen, L. Cheng, P. Wang and H. Yang,Polarized image of a synchrotron-emitting ring in an Einstein-Maxwell-scalar theory,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 024044 [2409.05304]

  29. [29]

    The observation image of a soliton boson star illuminated by various accretions,

    K.-J. He, G.-P. Li, C.-Y. Yang and X.-X. Zeng,The observation image of a soliton boson star illuminated by various accretions,JCAP10(2025) 003 [2502.16623]

  30. [30]

    X.-X. Zeng, H. Ye, K.-J. He and H. Yu,Optical images of massive boson stars with nonlinear electrodynamics,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1211 [2507.11583]. 19

  31. [31]

    Polarized image of synchrotron radiations of hotspots in Schwarzschilld- Melvin black hole spacetime

    H. Zhu and M. Guo,Polarized image of synchrotron radiations of hotspots in Schwarzschilld-Melvin black hole spacetime,2205.04777

  32. [32]

    Gravitational bending of light near compact objects,

    A.M. Beloborodov,Gravitational bending of light near compact objects,Astrophys. J. Lett.566 (2002) L85 [astro-ph/0201117]. [35]Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration,The Polarized Image of a Synchrotron-emitting Ring of Gas Orbiting a Black Hole,Astrophys. J.912(2021) 35 [2105.01804]

  33. [33]

    Polarized image of equatorial emission in the Kerr geometry,

    Z. Gelles, E. Himwich, D.C.M. Palumbo and M.D. Johnson,Polarized image of equatorial emission in the Kerr geometry,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 044060 [2105.09440]

  34. [34]

    X. Qin, S. Chen, X. Fu, Y. Huang and J. Jing,Polarized image of an equatorial emitting ring around a rotating braneworld black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 784 [2111.10138]

  35. [35]

    Shi and T

    H.-Y. Shi and T. Zhu,Polarized image of a synchrotron emitting ring around a static hairy black hole in Horndeski theory,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 814

  36. [36]

    Polarized image of equatorial emission in horizonless spacetimes: Naked singularities,

    V. Deliyski, G. Gyulchev, P. Nedkova and S. Yazadjiev,Polarized image of equatorial emission in horizonless spacetimes: Naked singularities,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 104049 [2303.14756]

  37. [37]

    Lovelock,The four-dimensionality of space and the einstein tensor,J

    D. Lovelock,The four-dimensionality of space and the einstein tensor,J. Math. Phys.13(1972) 874

  38. [38]

    Lanczos,A Remarkable property of the Riemann-Christoffel tensor in four dimensions, Annals Math.39(1938) 842

    C. Lanczos,A Remarkable property of the Riemann-Christoffel tensor in four dimensions, Annals Math.39(1938) 842

  39. [39]

    Lovelock,The Einstein tensor and its generalizations,J

    D. Lovelock,The Einstein tensor and its generalizations,J. Math. Phys.12(1971) 498

  40. [40]

    Zwiebach,Curvature Squared Terms and String Theories,Phys

    B. Zwiebach,Curvature Squared Terms and String Theories,Phys. Lett. B156(1985) 315

  41. [41]

    Nojiri, S.D

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou,Ghost-free Gauss-Bonnet Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 044050 [1811.07790]

  42. [42]

    Wiltshire,Spherically Symmetric Solutions of Einstein-maxwell Theory With a Gauss-Bonnet Term,Phys

    D.L. Wiltshire,Spherically Symmetric Solutions of Einstein-maxwell Theory With a Gauss-Bonnet Term,Phys. Lett. B169(1986) 36

  43. [43]

    Boulware and S

    D.G. Boulware and S. Deser,String Generated Gravity Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.55(1985) 2656

  44. [44]

    Cai, Phys

    R.-G. Cai,Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS spaces,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 084014 [hep-th/0109133]

  45. [45]

    Neupane,Thermodynamic and gravitational instability on hyperbolic spaces,Phys

    I.P. Neupane,Thermodynamic and gravitational instability on hyperbolic spaces,Phys. Rev. D 69(2004) 084011 [hep-th/0302132]

  46. [46]

    Dehghani,Charged rotating black branes in anti-de Sitter Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys

    M.H. Dehghani,Charged rotating black branes in anti-de Sitter Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 064017 [hep-th/0211191]

  47. [47]

    Torii and H

    T. Torii and H. Maeda,Spacetime structure of static solutions in gauss-bonnet gravity: Neutral case,Physical Review D¡ªParticles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology71(2005) 124002

  48. [48]

    Kumar and S

    R. Kumar and S.G. Ghosh,Rotating black holes in4DEinstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its shadow,JCAP07(2020) 053 [2003.08927]

  49. [49]

    Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification

    M. Azreg-A¨ ınou,Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 064041 [1405.2569]. 20

  50. [50]

    Azreg-A¨ ınou,From static to rotating to conformal static solutions: Rotating imperfect fluid wormholes with(out) electric or magnetic field, Eur

    M. Azreg-A¨ ınou,From static to rotating to conformal static solutions: Rotating imperfect fluid wormholes with(out) electric or magnetic field,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2865 [1401.4292]

  51. [51]

    Kerr,Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys

    R.P. Kerr,Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett.11(1963) 237

  52. [52]

    Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(1985)

    S. Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(1985)

  53. [53]

    Carter,Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,Phys

    B. Carter,Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,Phys. Rev.174(1968) 1559

  54. [54]

    Shadows of Kerr black holes with scalar hair

    P.V.P. Cunha, C.A.R. Herdeiro, E. Radu and H.F. Runarsson,Shadows of Kerr black holes with scalar hair,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 211102 [1509.00021]

  55. [55]

    Z. Hu, Z. Zhong, P.-C. Li, M. Guo and B. Chen,QED effect on a black hole shadow,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 044057 [2012.07022]

  56. [56]

    Y. Hou, Z. Zhang, H. Yan, M. Guo and B. Chen,Image of a Kerr-Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 064058 [2206.13744]

  57. [57]

    Chael, M

    A. Chael, M.D. Johnson and A. Lupsasca,Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon,Astrophys. J.918(2021) 6 [2106.00683]

  58. [58]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Hou and M. Guo,Observational signatures of rotating black holes in the semiclassical gravity with trace anomaly*,Chin. Phys. C48(2024) 085106 [2305.14924]

  59. [59]

    Coport: a new public code for polarized radiative transfer in a covariant framework,

    J. Huang, L. Zheng, M. Guo and B. Chen,Coport: a new public code for polarized radiative transfer in a covariant framework,JCAP11(2024) 054 [2407.10431]

  60. [60]

    Polarization images of solitonic boson stars,

    X.-X. Zeng, C.-Y. Yang, H. Yu and K.-J. He,Polarization images of solitonic boson stars,Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 169 [2508.11992]. 21