pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08359 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 📡 eess.AS

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Tracking Listener Attention: Gaze-Guided Audio-Visual Speech Enhancement Framework

Hsiang-Cheng Yang , You-Jin Li , Rong Chao , Yu Tsao , Borching Su , Shao-Yi Chien
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.AS
keywords gaze-guided speech enhancementaudio-visual speech enhancementcocktail party problemtarget speaker selectiongaze trackingAVSEmulti-talker environments
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gaze direction serves as an effective supervisory cue for selecting the target speaker in multi-talker audio-visual speech enhancement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a GG-AVSE framework that uses the listener's gaze to identify which speaker to enhance when multiple voices overlap. Conventional audio-visual speech enhancement lacks a reliable way to pick the intended target, and this work shows that gaze provides a natural cue to resolve that ambiguity by fusing eye signals with face detection before feeding features into a base enhancement model. A reader would care because the cocktail party problem limits practical use of speech systems in everyday settings such as meetings or video calls, and gaze tracking offers a direct, attention-based signal that humans already employ. The authors introduce a new dataset with gaze annotations and report consistent gains across objective metrics.

Core claim

The GG-AVSE framework exploits gaze direction as a supervisory cue for target-speaker selection by proposing the GG-VM module that combines gaze signals with a YOLO5Face detector to extract the target speaker's facial features and integrates them with the pretrained AVSEMamba model through zero-shot merging and partial visual fine-tuning, yielding 10.08% improvement in PESQ, 5.18% in STOI, and 23.69% in SI-SDR over gaze-free baselines on the AVSEC2-Gaze dataset.

What carries the argument

The GG-VM module, which merges gaze signals with facial detection to supply target-speaker visual features to the AVSEMamba enhancement model.

If this is right

  • GG-AVSE achieves measurable gains in PESQ, STOI, and SI-SDR compared with baselines that lack gaze information.
  • Gaze provides an effective cue for resolving target-speaker ambiguity in multi-talker settings.
  • The framework demonstrates scalability for real-world applications by relying on readily available gaze data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hearing-assistance devices could incorporate eye tracking to reduce the need for manual speaker selection.
  • Combining gaze with head-pose or audio-only cues might increase robustness when gaze is briefly unavailable.
  • The released AVSEC2-Gaze dataset could support training of other attention-aware audio-visual models.

Load-bearing premise

Gaze direction reliably indicates the listener's intended target speaker in multi-talker environments without significant errors from head movement or distraction.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures enhancement performance when participants are told to listen to one speaker while their gaze is directed elsewhere, or when head movements are frequent enough to degrade gaze tracking accuracy.

read the original abstract

This paper presents a Gaze-Guided Audio-Visual Speech Enhancement (GG-AVSE) framework to address the cocktail party problem. A major challenge in conventional AVSE is identifying the listener's intended speaker in multi-talker environments. GG-AVSE addresses this issue by exploiting gaze direction as a supervisory cue for target-speaker selection. Specifically, we propose the GG-VM module, which combines gaze signals with a YOLO5Face detector to extract the target speaker's facial features and integrates them with the pretrained AVSEMamba model through two strategies: zero-shot merging and partial visual fine-tuning. For evaluation, we introduce the AVSEC2-Gaze dataset. Experimental results show that GG-AVSE achieves substantial performance gains over gaze-free baselines: a 10.08% improvement in PESQ (2.370 to 2.609), a 5.18% improvement in STOI (0.8802 to 0.9258), and a 23.69% improvement in SI-SDR (9.16 to 11.33). These results confirm that gaze provides an effective cue for resolving target-speaker ambiguity and highlight the scalability of GG-AVSE for real-world applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Gaze-Guided Audio-Visual Speech Enhancement (GG-AVSE) framework to address the cocktail party problem by using listener gaze direction as a supervisory cue for target-speaker selection in multi-talker settings. It introduces the GG-VM module, which fuses gaze signals with YOLO5Face-extracted facial features before integrating them with the pretrained AVSEMamba model via zero-shot merging or partial visual fine-tuning. A new AVSEC2-Gaze dataset is presented, with experiments reporting gains over gaze-free baselines: PESQ from 2.370 to 2.609, STOI from 0.8802 to 0.9258, and SI-SDR from 9.16 to 11.33.

Significance. If the empirical results hold, the work has solid significance for audio-visual speech enhancement by demonstrating that gaze can effectively resolve target-speaker ambiguity, a key limitation in conventional AVSE. The introduction of the AVSEC2-Gaze dataset and the two integration strategies with a pretrained model are valuable contributions that support scalability claims. Credit is given for the concrete, quantifiable metric improvements and the focus on a practical cue.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental Results] Experimental Results section: the reported gains rely on the AVSEC2-Gaze dataset and controlled comparisons, but the manuscript provides insufficient detail on dataset construction (e.g., gaze-audio-visual synchronization, head-movement compensation, and error rates in gaze tracking). This is load-bearing for the central claim that gaze reliably indicates the intended speaker.
  2. [GG-VM Module] GG-VM module description: the zero-shot merging and partial fine-tuning strategies are presented without an ablation isolating the contribution of gaze-based selection versus other visual cues; this weakens attribution of the SI-SDR gain (+23.69%) specifically to the gaze cue.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the percentage improvements are correctly computed but should be accompanied by the exact baseline descriptions to allow immediate assessment without referring to the full text.
  2. [Throughout] Notation and figures: ensure consistent use of acronyms (AVSE, GG-AVSE) on first occurrence and improve clarity of any diagrams showing the GG-VM integration flow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will incorporate to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental Results] Experimental Results section: the reported gains rely on the AVSEC2-Gaze dataset and controlled comparisons, but the manuscript provides insufficient detail on dataset construction (e.g., gaze-audio-visual synchronization, head-movement compensation, and error rates in gaze tracking). This is load-bearing for the central claim that gaze reliably indicates the intended speaker.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for greater transparency on dataset construction to support the central claims. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the Experimental Results section with explicit details on gaze-audio-visual synchronization protocols, head-movement compensation techniques, and available gaze-tracking error rates or validation statistics. These additions will better substantiate the reliability of gaze as a cue for target-speaker selection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [GG-VM Module] GG-VM module description: the zero-shot merging and partial fine-tuning strategies are presented without an ablation isolating the contribution of gaze-based selection versus other visual cues; this weakens attribution of the SI-SDR gain (+23.69%) specifically to the gaze cue.

    Authors: Our existing comparisons against gaze-free AVSE baselines already isolate the effect of adding gaze direction. Nevertheless, to provide a more granular attribution of gains specifically to gaze-based selection (as opposed to other visual features from YOLO5Face), we will add a targeted ablation study in the revised version. This will directly compare the full GG-VM module against a variant that uses YOLO5Face features without gaze integration, clarifying the contribution to metrics such as SI-SDR. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical results on new dataset

full rationale

The paper introduces a GG-AVSE framework that uses gaze direction to select visual features via YOLO5Face and integrates them with a pretrained AVSEMamba model through zero-shot merging or partial fine-tuning. It evaluates this on the newly introduced AVSEC2-Gaze dataset, reporting metric gains (PESQ, STOI, SI-SDR) over gaze-free baselines. No equations, first-principles derivations, or predictions appear in the provided text. The central claim rests on direct experimental comparisons rather than any reduction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. The argument is self-contained as an empirical demonstration.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claim rests on pretrained AVSEMamba and YOLO5Face models plus the assumption that gaze is a reliable supervisory signal; no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract but partial fine-tuning implies them.

free parameters (1)
  • partial visual fine-tuning parameters
    The partial visual fine-tuning strategy requires hyperparameters whose values are not stated in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption YOLO5Face detector accurately extracts facial features from gaze-directed regions
    Invoked to obtain target speaker visual features for integration with AVSEMamba.
invented entities (1)
  • GG-VM module no independent evidence
    purpose: Combines gaze signals with YOLO5Face and integrates features into AVSEMamba
    New module proposed in this work; no independent evidence outside the paper is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5536 in / 1337 out tokens · 53189 ms · 2026-05-10T17:18:56.183935+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We propose the GG-VM module, which combines gaze signals with a YOLO5Face detector to extract the target speaker's facial features and integrates them with the pretrained AVSEMamba model through two strategies: zero-shot merging and partial visual fine-tuning.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Experimental results show that GG-AVSE achieves substantial performance gains over gaze-free baselines: a 10.08% improvement in PESQ (2.370→2.609), a 5.18% improvement in STOI (0.8802→0.9258), and a 23.69% improvement in SI-SDR (9.16→11.33).

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    This issue is particularly critical for applications such as hearing assistive technologies [2, 3], smart cockpits, and video conferencing systems

    INTRODUCTION The cocktail party problem [1] refers to the challenge of isolating a target speaker’s voice in noisy, multi-speaker environments. This issue is particularly critical for applications such as hearing assistive technologies [2, 3], smart cockpits, and video conferencing systems. Despite substantial progress, traditional audio-only enhancement ...

  2. [2]

    RELA TED WORK 2.1. Mamba-based audio-visual speech enhancement The primary objective of a Speech Enhancement (SE) system is to recover a clean target signals(t)from a noisy observationy(t), which is typically modeled as: y(t) =s(t) +v(t) +n(t),(1) wherev(t)andn(t)represent interfering speech and background noise, respectively. While single-channel audio-o...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    PROPOSED METHOD In this study, we propose the Gaze-Guided Audio-Visual Speech En- hancement (GG-A VSE) framework, which comprises two key com- ponents: a GG-VM and an A VSEMamba model with visual encoder fine-tuning. Fig. 1. System architecture of the proposed GG-VM module. 3.1. Gaze-guided visual module Identifying the attended speaker is essential in mu...

  4. [4]

    EXPERIMENT To evaluate the proposed framework, we conduct comprehensive ex- periments on a newly constructed dataset, A VSEC2-Gaze. 4.1. The A VSEC2-Gaze dataset The A VSEC2-Gaze dataset was constructed as a set of gaze-guided two-speaker mixtures derived from the A VSE Challenge dataset (A VSEC-2) [24]. Clean speech signals were sourced from the Lip Read...

  5. [5]

    CONCLUSION In this study, we proposed the GG-A VSE framework to address target-speaker ambiguity in multi-talker scenarios, a critical chal- lenge for conventional A VSE systems. To the best of our knowledge, this work is among the first to integrate gaze into modern A VSE frameworks, enabling explicit identification of the attended speaker and supplying ...

  6. [6]

    Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears,

    E. C. Cherry, “Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears,”Journal of the acoustical society of America, pp. 975–979, 1953

    1953

  7. [7]

    Venema,Compression for Clinicians, Chapter 7, Thomson Delmar Learning, 2006

    T. Venema,Compression for Clinicians, Chapter 7, Thomson Delmar Learning, 2006

    2006

  8. [8]

    Noise reduction in hearing aids: a review.,

    H. Levitt, “Noise reduction in hearing aids: a review.,”Jour- nal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, vol. 38, no. 1, 2001

    2001

  9. [9]

    Audio-visual speech enhancement using mul- timodal deep convolutional neural networks,

    J.-C. Hou, S.-S. Wang, Y .-H. Lai, Y . Tsao, H.-W. Chang, and H.-M. Wang, “Audio-visual speech enhancement using mul- timodal deep convolutional neural networks,”IEEE Transac- tions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, pp. 117–128, 2018

    2018

  10. [10]

    Improved lite audio- visual speech enhancement,

    S.-Y . Chuang, H.-M. Wang, and Y . Tsao, “Improved lite audio- visual speech enhancement,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Au- dio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 30, pp. 1345– 1359, 2022

    2022

  11. [11]

    Visualvoice: Audio-visual speech separation with cross-modal consistency,

    R. Gao and K. Grauman, “Visualvoice: Audio-visual speech separation with cross-modal consistency,” inProc. CVPR. IEEE, 2021, pp. 15490–15500

    2021

  12. [12]

    Look- ing into your speech: Learning cross-modal affinity for audio- visual speech separation,

    J. Lee, S.-W. Chung, S. Kim, H.-G. Kang, and K. Sohn, “Look- ing into your speech: Learning cross-modal affinity for audio- visual speech separation,” inProc. CVPR, 2021, pp. 1336– 1345

    2021

  13. [13]

    An overview of deep-learning-based audio- visual speech enhancement and separation,

    D. Michelsanti, Z.-H. Tan, S.-X. Zhang, Y . Xu, M. Yu, D. Yu, and J. Jensen, “An overview of deep-learning-based audio- visual speech enhancement and separation,”IEEE/ACM Trans- actions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 29, pp. 1368–1396, 2021

    2021

  14. [14]

    Audio-visual speech enhancement and separation by utilizing multi-modal self- supervised embeddings,

    I.-. Chern, K.-H. Hung, Y .-T. Chen, T. Hussain, M. Gogate, A. Hussain, Y . Tsao, and J.-C. Hou, “Audio-visual speech enhancement and separation by utilizing multi-modal self- supervised embeddings,” inProc. ICASSP, 2023, pp. 1–5

    2023

  15. [15]

    Leveraging mamba with full-face vision for audio-visual speech enhancement,

    R. Chao, W. Ren, Y .-J. Li, K.-H. Hung, S.-F. Huang, S.-W. Fu, W.-H. Cheng, and Y . Tsao, “Leveraging mamba with full-face vision for audio-visual speech enhancement,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13624, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spaces

    A. Gu, K. Goel, and C. R ´e, “Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00396, 2021

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,

    J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, “You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,” inProc. CVPR, 2016, pp. 779–788

    2016

  18. [18]

    Reti- naface: Single-shot multi-level face localisation in the wild,

    J. Deng, J. Guo, E. Ververas, I. Kotsia, and S. Zafeiriou, “Reti- naface: Single-shot multi-level face localisation in the wild,” inProc. CVPR, 2020, pp. 5203–5212

    2020

  19. [19]

    Joint face detec- tion and alignment using multitask cascaded convolutional net- works,

    K. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Li, and Y . Qiao, “Joint face detec- tion and alignment using multitask cascaded convolutional net- works,”IEEE signal processing letters, pp. 1499–1503, 2016

    2016

  20. [20]

    Yolo5face: Why rein- venting a face detector,

    D. Qi, W. Tan, Q. Yao, and J. Liu, “Yolo5face: Why rein- venting a face detector,” inProc. ECCV. Springer, 2022, pp. 228–244

    2022

  21. [21]

    Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces

    A. Gu and T. Dao, “Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Location-aware target speaker extraction for hearing aids,

    D.-J. A. Padilla, N. L Westhausen, S. Vivekananthan, and B. T Meyer, “Location-aware target speaker extraction for hearing aids,” inProc. Interspeech, 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    Real-time gaze-directed speech enhancement for audio-visual hearing-aids,

    A. R. Anway, B. Buck, M. Gogate, K. Dashtipour, M. Akeroyd, and A. Hussain, “Real-time gaze-directed speech enhancement for audio-visual hearing-aids,” inProc. Interspeech, 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    Ganzin sol glasses: Wearable eye-tracking smart glasses,

    “Ganzin sol glasses: Wearable eye-tracking smart glasses,” Available:https://ganzin.com/en/ sol-glasses-wearable-eye-tracker/, 2025, Official product page. Accessed: 2025-09-15

    2025

  25. [25]

    Wider face: A face detection benchmark,

    S. Yang, P. Luo, C.-C. Loy, and X. Tang, “Wider face: A face detection benchmark,” inProc. CVPR, 2016, pp. 5525–5533

    2016

  26. [26]

    The pascal visual object classes (voc) chal- lenge,

    M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman, “The pascal visual object classes (voc) chal- lenge,”International journal of computer vision, pp. 303–338, 2010

    2010

  27. [27]

    Distance- iou loss: Faster and better learning for bounding box regres- sion,

    Z. Zheng, P. Wang, W. Liu, J. Li, R. Ye, and D. Ren, “Distance- iou loss: Faster and better learning for bounding box regres- sion,” inProc. AAAI, 2020, pp. 12993–13000

    2020

  28. [28]

    A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,

    T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, and G. Hinton, “A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,” inProc. ICML. PmLR, 2020, pp. 1597–1607

    2020

  29. [29]

    Avse challenge: Audio-visual speech enhancement challenge,

    A. L. A. Blanco, C. Valentini-Botinhao, O. Klejch, M. Gogate, K. Dashtipour, A. Hussain, and P. Bell, “Avse challenge: Audio-visual speech enhancement challenge,” inProc. SLT, 2023, pp. 465–471

    2023

  30. [30]

    LRS3-TED: a large- scale dataset for visual speech recognition,

    T. Afouras, J. S. Chung, and A. Zisserman, “Lrs3-ted: a large- scale dataset for visual speech recognition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.00496, 2018

    work page arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Clarity-2021 challenges: Machine learning challenges for advancing hear- ing aid processing,

    S. Graetzer, J. Barker, T. J. Cox, M. Akeroyd, J. F. Culling, G. Naylor, E. Porter, R. Viveros Munoz, et al., “Clarity-2021 challenges: Machine learning challenges for advancing hear- ing aid processing,” inProc. Interspeech. ISCA, 2021, pp. 686–690

    2021

  32. [32]

    The diverse envi- ronments multi-channel acoustic noise database (demand): A database of multichannel environmental noise recordings,

    J. Thiemann, N. Ito, and E. Vincent, “The diverse envi- ronments multi-channel acoustic noise database (demand): A database of multichannel environmental noise recordings,” in Proc. POMA. ASA, 2013, pp. 35–81

    2013

  33. [33]

    Icassp 2021 deep noise suppression challenge,

    C. K. Reddy, H. Dubey, V . Gopal, R. Cutler, S. Braun, H. Gam- per, R. Aichner, and S. Srinivasan, “Icassp 2021 deep noise suppression challenge,” inProc. ICASSP, 2021

    2021

  34. [34]

    Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (pesq)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs,

    A. W. Rix, J. G. Beerends, M. P. Hollier, and A. P. Hek- stra, “Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (pesq)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs,” inProc. ICASSP, 2001

    2001

  35. [35]

    A short-time objective intelligibility measure for time-frequency weighted noisy speech,

    C. H. Taal, R. C. Hendriks, R. Heusdens, and J. Jensen, “A short-time objective intelligibility measure for time-frequency weighted noisy speech,” in2010 IEEE international confer- ence on acoustics, speech and signal processing. IEEE, 2010, pp. 4214–4217

    2010

  36. [36]

    An algorithm for intelligibility prediction of time–frequency weighted noisy speech,

    C. H. Taal, R. C. Hendriks, R. Heusdens, and J. Jensen, “An algorithm for intelligibility prediction of time–frequency weighted noisy speech,”IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 2125–2136, 2011

    2011

  37. [37]

    Sdr– half-baked or well done?,

    J. Le Roux, S. Wisdom, H. Erdogan, and J. R. Hershey, “Sdr– half-baked or well done?,” inProc. ICASSP. IEEE, 2019, pp. 626–630

    2019