pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.10043 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · physics.optics· quant-ph

Quantum geometry of the non-Hermitian skin effect

Ken-Ichiro Imura , Kohei Kawabata This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall physics.opticsquant-ph
keywords non-Hermitian skin effectquantum metriclocalization lengthboundary conditionsgeneralized Brillouin zoneHatano-Nelson modelnonreciprocal SSH model
0
0 comments X

The pith

The localization length of the non-Hermitian skin effect is encoded in the quantum metric from right eigenstates alone.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a geometric description of the skin effect, in which nonreciprocity drives a macroscopic number of eigenstates to localize at the system boundary. The central finding is that the length scale of this localization is captured by the quantum metric built solely from the right eigenstates. The same metric shows power-law divergences at gapless points whose form changes with boundary conditions, and its discontinuities mark cusps in the generalized Brillouin zone. These relations are shown explicitly in the Hatano-Nelson chain and the nonreciprocal Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model.

Core claim

We demonstrate that the localization length scale associated with the skin effect is encoded in the quantum metric defined solely from right eigenstates, but not in the biorthogonal quantum metric. Moreover, we show that the quantum metrics exhibit the power-law divergences at gapless points that depend on the different boundary conditions. We also reveal that cusps of the generalized Brillouin zone in non-Bloch band theory are signaled by discontinuities in the quantum metrics.

What carries the argument

The quantum metric constructed from right eigenstates, which directly encodes the skin-effect localization length.

If this is right

  • The right-state quantum metric predicts the skin localization length in the Hatano-Nelson and nonreciprocal SSH models.
  • Power-law divergences appear in the quantum metrics at gapless points, with the exponent depending on the choice of boundary conditions.
  • Discontinuities in the quantum metrics coincide with cusps of the generalized Brillouin zone.
  • These geometric signatures distinguish open-boundary from periodic-boundary behavior without requiring full diagonalization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A metric-based diagnostic could simplify numerical searches for skin states in large open lattices by avoiding biorthogonal inner products.
  • The same construction may extend to higher-dimensional non-Hermitian lattices where boundary accumulation occurs along edges or corners.
  • Experiments that measure wave-function overlaps in photonic or acoustic metamaterials could test whether the right-state metric alone suffices to forecast boundary sensitivity.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum metric built from right eigenstates alone stays well-defined and correctly gives the skin localization length even when eigenvalues are complex and the open-boundary spectrum reaches gapless points.

What would settle it

An explicit computation in the Hatano-Nelson model where the decay length of the skin-localized states under open boundaries fails to match the value extracted from the right-eigenstate quantum metric.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.10043 by Ken-Ichiro Imura, Kohei Kawabata.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Complex spectrum of the generalized non-Hermitian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Trajectory of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Cusps and gapless points in the generalized Brillouin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Singular behaviors of the quantum metrics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Singular behaviors of the quantum metrics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The slopes of the asymptotes, determining the power￾law divergence [see Eq. (103)] in the vicinity of the gapless point θ = θ ∗ 1 , are obtained as −α ≈ −1 for χ RR (green) and Im χ LR (orange), and −α ≈ −2 for Re χ LR (blue). of the quantum metrics in Eqs. (85) and (86), one may expect the corresponding critical behavior to be modi￾fied. In this section, we demonstrate that this is indeed the case, and th… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Complex energy spectrum under the open boundary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Cancellation of divergences in (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The non-Hermitian skin effect is nonreciprocity-induced localization phenomena in which a macroscopic number of eigenstates accumulate anomalously at the boundary, accompanied by the extreme sensitivity to boundary conditions. Here, we develop a geometric characterization of the non-Hermitian skin effect. We demonstrate that the localization length scale associated with the skin effect is encoded in the quantum metric defined solely from right eigenstates, but not in the biorthogonal quantum metric. Moreover, we show that the quantum metrics exhibit the power-law divergences at gapless points that depend on the different boundary conditions. We also reveal that cusps of the generalized Brillouin zone in non-Bloch band theory are signaled by discontinuities in the quantum metrics. We illustrate these behavior using prototypical non-Hermitian models, such as the Hatano-Nelson model and the non-Hermitian, nonreciprocal Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a geometric characterization of the non-Hermitian skin effect. It claims that the localization length scale of the skin effect is encoded in the quantum metric constructed solely from right eigenstates (but not the biorthogonal quantum metric), that the metrics exhibit power-law divergences at gapless points that depend on boundary conditions, and that discontinuities in the metrics signal cusps in the generalized Brillouin zone. These features are illustrated on the Hatano-Nelson model and the non-Hermitian nonreciprocal SSH model.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a direct geometric diagnostic for the skin-effect localization length using only right eigenvectors, linking quantum geometry to non-Bloch band theory and boundary-condition sensitivity in non-Hermitian systems. The illustrations on standard models and the identification of metric discontinuities at generalized-BZ cusps are concrete strengths that could be useful for diagnosing non-Hermitian topology.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (definition of the right-eigenstate quantum metric): the construction g_{μν} = Re[⟨∂_μ R|∂_ν R⟩ − ⟨∂_μ R|R⟩⟨R|∂_ν R⟩] using the standard (non-biorthogonal) inner product is not shown to be invariant under k-dependent phase redefinitions |R(k)⟩ → e^{iθ(k)}|R(k)⟩. The subtracted term does not cancel the extra contributions from ∂θ when left and right eigenvectors are unrelated (as occurs for complex spectra and at gapless points). This directly affects the central claim that the metric encodes the skin localization length independently of gauge choice.
  2. [§4.1 and §4.2] §4.1 (Hatano-Nelson model) and §4.2 (NH-SSH model): the reported power-law divergences of the metric at gapless points and the discontinuities at generalized-BZ cusps are presented for specific parameter sets and open-boundary conditions. No explicit finite-size scaling, convergence tests, or checks against alternative gauges or small perturbations are provided, leaving open whether the divergences and discontinuities are robust or sensitive to post-hoc choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The notation distinguishing left and right eigenvectors should be introduced consistently in the introduction rather than only in the methods section.
  2. [Figures 2-4] Figure captions for the metric plots should explicitly state the system size, boundary conditions, and gauge choice used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation and add the requested validations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (definition of the right-eigenstate quantum metric): the construction g_{μν} = Re[⟨∂_μ R|∂_ν R⟩ − ⟨∂_μ R|R⟩⟨R|∂_ν R⟩] using the standard (non-biorthogonal) inner product is not shown to be invariant under k-dependent phase redefinitions |R(k)⟩ → e^{iθ(k)}|R(k)⟩. The subtracted term does not cancel the extra contributions from ∂θ when left and right eigenvectors are unrelated (as occurs for complex spectra and at gapless points). This directly affects the central claim that the metric encodes the skin localization length independently of gauge choice.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need to demonstrate gauge invariance. Although the original manuscript did not include an explicit proof, the right-eigenstate quantum metric is invariant under k-dependent phase redefinitions |R(k)⟩ → e^{iθ(k)}|R(k)⟩. To see this, let |R'⟩ = e^{iθ}|R⟩ with ⟨R|R⟩=1. Substituting into the expression yields ⟨∂_μ R'|∂_ν R'⟩ = ∂_μθ ∂_νθ + ⟨∂_μ R|∂_ν R⟩ − i ∂_μθ ⟨R|∂_ν R⟩ + i ∂_νθ ⟨∂_μ R|R⟩. The subtracted term ⟨∂_μ R'|R'⟩⟨R'|∂_ν R'⟩ expands to exactly the same ∂_μθ ∂_νθ + ⟨∂_μ R|R⟩⟨R|∂_ν R⟩ − i ∂_μθ ⟨R|∂_ν R⟩ + i ∂_νθ ⟨∂_μ R|R⟩. Their difference recovers the original g_{μν}, with all ∂θ contributions canceling. This holds using only the standard inner product and is independent of the left eigenvectors, including at gapless points. We have added this derivation to §2 of the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1 and §4.2] §4.1 (Hatano-Nelson model) and §4.2 (NH-SSH model): the reported power-law divergences of the metric at gapless points and the discontinuities at generalized-BZ cusps are presented for specific parameter sets and open-boundary conditions. No explicit finite-size scaling, convergence tests, or checks against alternative gauges or small perturbations are provided, leaving open whether the divergences and discontinuities are robust or sensitive to post-hoc choices.

    Authors: We agree that explicit robustness checks strengthen the results. In the revised manuscript we have added finite-size scaling analyses for the metric divergences at gapless points in both models, showing that the power-law exponents remain stable and the divergences converge with increasing system size under open boundary conditions. We have also included convergence tests with respect to system size, checks under small parameter perturbations, and verification under alternative phase choices for the right eigenvectors, confirming that the discontinuities at generalized Brillouin zone cusps are robust and not sensitive to these choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via explicit computation on eigenstates

full rationale

The paper's central demonstration—that the skin-effect localization length is encoded in the right-eigenstate quantum metric but not the biorthogonal one—is presented as a computed relation in concrete models (Hatano-Nelson, NH-SSH). No equation reduces the metric definition to the localization length by construction, nor is a parameter fitted to data then relabeled as a prediction. Power-law divergences and GBZ-cusp discontinuities are shown as geometric consequences at gapless points rather than tautological redefinitions. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the uniqueness of the right-only metric. The chain remains independent of its target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard definition of the quantum metric from right eigenvectors and the assumption that the non-Hermitian skin effect can be characterized by a single localization length extracted from that metric. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quantum metric is well-defined from right eigenvectors of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian
    Invoked when the authors state that the localization length is encoded in this metric.
  • domain assumption Power-law divergences and discontinuities in the metric are directly tied to gapless points and generalized Brillouin zone cusps
    Stated as demonstrated behavior without derivation details in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5458 in / 1498 out tokens · 45072 ms · 2026-05-10T16:13:32.917718+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Bloch Quantum Geometry of Non-Hermitian Systems

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Establishes exact equivalence between real-space and non-Bloch integrated quantum metrics for non-Hermitian open-boundary systems and shows the latter gives the gauge-invariant spread of non-Bloch Wannier functions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 119 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Quantum geometric tensor from right eigenstates We first consider the quantum geometric tensor defined solely from the right eigenstate: χRR µν :=⟨∂ µuR| 1− |u R⟩⟨uR| |∂νuR⟩, µ, ν∈ {k, g}. (42) For this purpose, we normalize the right eigenstate by itself (i.e.,⟨u R|uR⟩= 1): |uR⟩= 1p Z(g) LX n=1 e(ik+g)n |n⟩,(43) with Z(g) := LX n=1 e2gn = e2g e2gL −1 e2g...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Biorthogonal quantum geometric tensor We next consider the quantum geometric tensor con- structed from both right and left eigenstates: χLR µν :=⟨ ⟨∂µuL| 1− |u R⟩⟨ ⟨uL| |∂νuR⟩, µ, ν∈ {k, g}. (55) 6 Since we have ∂g|uR⟩=−i∂ k|uR⟩, ∂ g|uL⟩ ⟩=−i∂ k|uL⟩ ⟩,(56) we obtain χLR =χ LR kk 1−i i 1 ,(57) χLR kk = 1 L LX n=1 n2 − 1 L LX n=1 n !2 = L2 −1 12 .(58) In co...

    work page

  3. [3]

    (71) A straightforward calculation from Eq

    Metric defined from right eigenstates We first consider the quantum metric defined solely from the normalized right eigenstate: χRR(k) =⟨∂ kuR −(k)|∂kuR −(k)⟩ − ⟨uR −(k)|∂kuR −(k)⟩ 2 . (71) A straightforward calculation from Eq. (67) yields χRR(k) = ∂k p z(k) 2 (1 +|z(k)|) 2 = |z(k)| 4 (1 +|z(k)|) 2 |∂k logz(k)| 2 = 1 4 p(k) q(k) 1 + p(k) q(k) 2 ∂kp(k) p(...

    work page

  4. [4]

    (73) Using Eqs

    Biorthogonal metric We next consider the biorthogonal metric defined from both right and left eigenstates: χLR(k) =⟨ ⟨∂kuL −(k)| 1− |u R −(k)⟩ ⟨ ⟨uL −(k)| |∂kuR −(k)⟩. (73) Using Eqs. (67) and (69), we find χLR(k) =− 1 16 ∂kp(k) p(k) − ∂kq(k) q(k) 2 .(74) Unlikeχ RR, the quantityχ LR is generally complex and is not positive definite. Nevertheless, it is i...

    work page

  5. [5]

    (72) gives χRR(k)≃ |p′(k∗)| 4|q(k ∗)| 1 |k−k ∗| .(78) Therefore, the right-right quantum metric diverges with a first-order pole in the momentum deviation

    Critical behavior ofχ RR Suppose that there existsk ∗ ∈[0,2π) such that p(k∗) = 0, q(k ∗)̸= 0.(76) In the generic case, we may expand p(k)≃p ′(k∗)(k−k ∗) (p ′(k∗)̸= 0).(77) Then, Eq. (72) gives χRR(k)≃ |p′(k∗)| 4|q(k ∗)| 1 |k−k ∗| .(78) Therefore, the right-right quantum metric diverges with a first-order pole in the momentum deviation. The same conclusio...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Critical behavior ofχ LR Under the same assumptionp(k ∗) = 0 andq(k ∗)̸= 0, Eq. (74) yields Reχ LR(k)≃ − 1 16 1 (k−k ∗)2 ,(79) Imχ LR(k)≃ 1 8Im q′ (k∗) q(k ∗) 1 k−k ∗ .(80) Notably, the power-law divergence of Reχ LR is indepen- dent of the detailed forms ofp(k) andq(k). The biorthog- onal metric exhibits a second-order pole, which is more singular than t...

    work page

  7. [7]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum mate- rials, npj Quantum Mater.10, 101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    A. Gao, N. Nagaosa, N. Ni, and S.-Y. Xu, Quantum Geometry Phenomena in Condensed Matter Systems, arXiv:2508.00469

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B56, 12847 (1997)

    work page 1997

  10. [10]

    Resta and S

    R. Resta and S. Sorella, Electron Localization in the Insulating State, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 370 (1999)

    work page 1999

  11. [11]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, Polarization and localization in insulators: Generating function ap- proach, Phys. Rev. B62, 1666 (2000)

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    Brouder, G

    C. Brouder, G. Panati, M. Calandra, C. Mourougane, and N. Marzari, Exponential Localization of Wannier Functions in Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 046402 (2007)

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nat. Commun.6, 8944 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    S. A. Chen and K. T. Law, Ginzburg-Landau Theory of Flat-Band Superconductors with Quantum Metric, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 026002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Fundamental Bound on Topologi- cal Gap, Phys. Rev. X14, 011052 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Shinada and N

    K. Shinada and N. Nagaosa, Quantum geometric bounds for observables: Linear responses, Drude weight, and orbital magnetization, Phys. Rev. B112, 155158 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B90, 165139 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact Landau Level Description of Geometry and In- teraction in a Flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vortex- ability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, 205144 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    M. S. Rudner and L. S. Levitov, Topological Transition in a Non-Hermitian Quantum Walk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 065703 (2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    M. Sato, K. Hasebe, K. Esaki, and M. Kohmoto, Time- Reversal Symmetry in Non-Hermitian Systems, Prog. Theor. Phys.127, 937 (2012); K. Esaki, M. Sato, K. Hasebe, and M. Kohmoto, Edge states and topo- logical phases in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 205128 (2011)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Y. C. Hu and T. L. Hughes, Absence of topological in- sulator phases in non-HermitianPT-symmetric Hamil- tonians, Phys. Rev. B84, 153101 (2011). 16

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Opt

    H. Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Opt. Lett.38, 1912 (2013)

    work page 1912

  24. [24]

    Longhi, D

    S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. D. Valle, Robust light trans- port in non-Hermitian photonic lattices, Sci. Rep.5, 13376 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Malzard, C

    S. Malzard, C. Poli, and H. Schomerus, Topologically Protected Defect States in Open Photonic Systems with Non-Hermitian Charge-Conjugation and Parity-Time Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 200402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Leykam, K

    D. Leykam, K. Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y. D. Chong, and F. Nori, Edge Modes, Degeneracies, and Topological Numbers in Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Xu, S.-T

    Y. Xu, S.-T. Wang, and L.-M. Duan, Weyl Exceptional Rings in a Three-Dimensional Dissipative Cold Atomic Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 045701 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Topological Band The- ory for Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 146402 (2018); V. Kozii and L. Fu, Non-Hermitian topological theory of finite-lifetime quasiparticles: Pre- diction of bulk Fermi arc due to exceptional point, Phys. Rev. B109, 235139 (2024)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Takata and M

    K. Takata and M. Notomi, Photonic Topological Insu- lating Phase Induced Solely by Gain and Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 213902 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological Phases of Non- Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. X8, 031079 (2018); K. Kawabata, S. Higashikawa, Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, and M. Ueda, Topological unification of time-reversal and particle-hole symmetries in non-Hermitian physics, Nat. Commun.10, 297 (2019)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    McDonald, T

    A. McDonald, T. Pereg-Barnea, and A. A. Clerk, Phase-Dependent Chiral Transport and Effective Non- Hermitian Dynamics in a Bosonic Kitaev-Majorana Chain, Phys. Rev. X8, 041031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Longhi, Topological Phase Transition in non- Hermitian Quasicrystals, Phys

    S. Longhi, Topological Phase Transition in non- Hermitian Quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 237601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X9, 041015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Zhou and J

    H. Zhou and J. Y. Lee, Periodic table for topological bands with non-Hermitian symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 99, 235112 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Bessho, and M. Sato, Classification of Exceptional Points and Non-Hermitian Topological Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 066405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    J. Y. Lee, J. Ahn, H. Zhou, and A. Vishwanath, Topo- logical Correspondence between Hermitian and Non- Hermitian Systems: Anomalous Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 206404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Chang, J.-S

    P.-Y. Chang, J.-S. You, X. Wen, and S. Ryu, En- tanglement spectrum and entropy in topological non- Hermitian systems and nonunitary conformal field the- ory, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033069 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp, Topological framework for directional amplification in driven-dissipative cavity arrays, Nat. Commun.11, 3149 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Bessho and M

    T. Bessho and M. Sato, Nielsen-Ninomiya Theorem with Bulk Topology: Duality in Floquet and Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 196404 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    M. M. Denner, A. Skurativska, F. Schindler, M. H. Fis- cher, R. Thomale, T. Bzduˇ sek, and T. Neupert, Excep- tional topological insulators, Nat. Commun.12, 5681 (2021); M. M. Denner, T. Neupert, and F. Schindler, Infernal and exceptional edge modes: non-Hermitian topology beyond the skin effect, J. Phys. Mater.6, 045006 (2023)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and S. Ryu, Topological Field Theory of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 216405 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Okugawa, R

    R. Okugawa, R. Takahashi, and K. Yokomizo, Non- Hermitian band topology with generalized inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B103, 205205 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    P. M. Vecsei, M. M. Denner, T. Neupert, and F. Schindler, Symmetry indicators for inversion- symmetric non-Hermitian topological band structures, Phys. Rev. B103, L201114 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Shiozaki and S

    K. Shiozaki and S. Ono, Symmetry indicator in non- Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B104, 035424 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Franca, V

    S. Franca, V. K¨ onye, F. Hassler, J. van den Brink, and C. Fulga, Non-Hermitian Physics without Gain or Loss: The Skin Effect of Reflected Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 086601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Nakamura, T

    D. Nakamura, T. Bessho, and M. Sato, Bulk-Boundary Correspondence in Point-Gap Topological Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 136401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    X.-R. Ma, K. Cao, X.-R. Wang, Z. Wei, Q. Du, and S.-P. Kou, Non-Hermitian chiral skin effect, Phys. Rev. Research6, 013213 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Schindler, K

    F. Schindler, K. Gu, B. Lian, and K. Kawabata, Hermi- tian Bulk – Non-Hermitian Boundary Correspondence, PRX Quantum4, 030315 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Nakamura, K

    D. Nakamura, K. Inaka, N. Okuma, and M. Sato, Uni- versal Platform of Point-Gap Topological Phases from Topological Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 256602 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Tanaka, D

    Y. Tanaka, D. Nakamura, R. Okugawa, and K. Kawa- bata, Exceptional second-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B112, 245302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Wang and W

    Y. Wang and W. A. Benalcazar, Higher-order topologi- cal knots and the classification of non-Hermitian lattices underC n symmetry, Phys. Rev. B111, 205123 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    C. Poli, M. Bellec, U. Kuhl, F. Mortessagne, and H. Schomerus, Selective enhancement of topologically induced interface states in a dielectric resonator chain, Nat. Commun.6, 6710 (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    J. M. Zeuner, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, M. S. Rudner, M. Segev, and A. Szameit, Ob- servation of a Topological Transition in the Bulk of a Non-Hermitian System, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 040402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, Y. Igarashi, L. Lu, I. Kaminer, A. Pick, S.-L. Chua, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Spawning rings of exceptional points out of Dirac cones, Nature525, 354 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Weimann, M

    S. Weimann, M. Kremer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, K. G. Makris, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Topologically protected bound states in photonic parity-time-symmetric crystals, Nat. Mater. 16, 433 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    L. Xiao, X. Zhan, Z. H. Bian, K. K. Wang, X. Zhang, X. P. Wang, J. Li, K. Mochizuki, D. Kim, N. Kawakami, W. Yi, H. Obuse, B. C. Sanders, and P. Xue, Observa- tion of topological edge states in parity-time-symmetric quantum walks, Nat. Phys.13, 1117 (2017). 17

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, T. Ozawa, L. L. Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Lasing in topological edge states of a one- dimensional lattice, Nat. Photon.11, 651 (2017)

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    Parto, S

    M. Parto, S. Wittek, H. Hodaei, G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, J. Ren, M. C. Rechtsman, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Edge-Mode Las- ing in 1D Topological Active Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 113901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Bahari, A

    B. Bahari, A. Ndao, F. Vallini, A. E. Amili, Y. Fainman, and B. Kant´ e, Nonreciprocal lasing in topological cavi- ties of arbitrary geometries, Science358, 636 (2017)

    work page 2017

  60. [60]

    H. Zhao, P. Miao, M. H. Teimourpour, S. Malzard, R. El-Ganainy, H. Schomerus, and L. Feng, Topological hybrid silicon microlasers, Nat. Commun.9, 981 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    H. Zhou, C. Peng, Y. Yoon, C. W. Hsu, K. A. Nelson, L. Fu, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, and B. Zhen, Observation of bulk Fermi arc and polarization half charge from paired exceptional points, Science359, 1009 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Harari, M

    G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, Y. Lumer, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. D. Chong, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Segev, Topological insulator laser: The- ory, Science359, eaar4003 (2018); M. A. Bandres, S. Wittek, G. Harari, M. Parto, J. Ren, M. Segev, D. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Topological insulator laser: Experiments, Science359, eaar4005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Cerjan, S

    A. Cerjan, S. Huang, K. P. Chen, Y. Chong, and M. C. Rechtsman, Experimental realization of a Weyl excep- tional ring, Nat. Photon.13, 623 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    H. Zhao, X. Qiao, T. Wu, B. Midya, S. Longhi, and L. Feng, Non-Hermitian topological light steering, Sci- ence365, 1163 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Zhang, X

    W. Zhang, X. Ouyang, X. Huang, X. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Yu, X. Chang, Y. Liu, D.-L. Deng, and L.-M. Duan, Observation of Non-Hermitian Topology with Nonuni- tary Dynamics of Solid-State Spins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 090501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    W. Wang, X. Wang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian mor- phing of topological modes, Nature608, 50 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Ochkan, R

    K. Ochkan, R. Chaturvedi, V. K¨ onye, L. Veyrat, R. Gi- raud, D. Mailly, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, E. M. Han- kiewicz, B. B¨ uchner, J. van den Brink, J. Dufouleur, and I. C. Fulga, Non-Hermitian topology in a multi-terminal quantum Hall device, Nat. Phys.20, 395 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    V. V. Konotop, J. Yang, and D. A. Zezyulin, Nonlinear waves inPT-symmetric systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys.14, 11 (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    T. E. Lee, Anomalous Edge State in a Non-Hermitian Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 133903 (2016)

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    Xiong, Why does bulk boundary correspondence fail in some non-hermitian topological models, J

    Y. Xiong, Why does bulk boundary correspondence fail in some non-hermitian topological models, J. Phys. Commun.2, 035043 (2018)

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-Hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B97, 121401(R) (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge States and Topological Invari- ants of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018); S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non- Hermitian Chern Bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 136802 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal Bulk-Boundary Corre- spondence in Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Ueda, Anomalous helical edge states in a non-Hermitian Chern insulator, Phys. Rev. B98, 165148 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B99, 201103(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  77. [77]

    Liu, Y.-R

    T. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, Q. Ai, Z. Gong, K. Kawa- bata, M. Ueda, and F. Nori, Second-Order Topologi- cal Phases in Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    C. H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Hybrid Higher- Order Skin-Topological Modes in Nonreciprocal Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 016805 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    Herviou, J

    L. Herviou, J. H. Bardarson, and N. Regnault, Defining a bulk-edge correspondence for non-Hermitian Hamil- tonians via singular-value decomposition, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052118 (2019)

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    Zirnstein, G

    H.-G. Zirnstein, G. Refael, and B. Rosenow, Bulk- Boundary Correspondence for Non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians via Green Functions, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 216407 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.