Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A discrete visual generator that refines like an artist and spends compute only where images are hard.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-07-12 20:59 UTC pith:VBTBECI4

load-bearing objection Clean discrete tokenizer plus a real global refine/erase AR loop that actually posts new ImageNet numbers and ships code. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2604.13030 v2 pith:VBTBECI4 submitted 2026-04-14 cs.CV

Generative Refinement Networks for Visual Synthesis

Jian Han , Jinlai Liu , Jiahuan Wang , Bingyue Peng , Zehuan Yuan This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords generative refinement networkshierarchical binary quantizationautoregressive visual generationadaptive-step samplingdiscrete visual tokenizertext-to-imagetext-to-videoImageNet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Diffusion models waste the same number of steps on every image, easy or hard. Standard autoregressive models know which samples are hard via likelihood, but they are held back by lossy tokenizers and by the fact that once a token is written it can never be fixed. This paper introduces Generative Refinement Networks (GRN) to close both gaps. First it replaces ordinary discrete codes with Hierarchical Binary Quantization (HBQ), a multi-round binary scheme whose reconstruction error falls exponentially and matches continuous autoencoders at higher compression. On top of those tokens GRN starts from a random map and, at every step, can fill blank regions, revise earlier tokens, or erase mistakes—exactly as a painter works. An entropy schedule then decides how many steps each sample needs. On ImageNet the method sets new records for both reconstruction and class-conditional generation; at a 2 B scale it also beats same-size diffusion and AR baselines on text-to-image and text-to-video benchmarks.

Core claim

A discrete visual generator can simultaneously match continuous reconstruction quality and exceed fixed-step diffusion models if it uses Hierarchical Binary Quantization for near-lossless tokens and then generates by progressive global refinement (fill / revise / erase) under an entropy-guided step schedule.

What carries the argument

Hierarchical Binary Quantization (HBQ) plus the generative refinement loop: each latent is repeatedly binary-quantized so error decays as 1/2^j; generation then starts from a random token map and, guided by a rising selection ratio, rewrites every token at every step so earlier mistakes can be corrected.

Load-bearing premise

That the random mixture of real and noise tokens used in training continues to let the model correct, rather than re-introduce, errors when the same random selection is used at inference for longer videos or higher resolutions.

What would settle it

Train the identical architecture with a pure mask schedule (no re-writing of already-chosen tokens) and measure whether ImageNet FID collapses back toward the 18-point regime shown in the paper’s own ablation; or measure whether the entropy schedule still yields stable videos once clip length exceeds the 2–10 s range used for training.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Discrete visual tokenizers no longer need larger latent channels or huge codebooks to match continuous reconstruction quality.
  • Autoregressive generators can allocate fewer steps to easy samples and more steps to hard ones without an external controller.
  • Error accumulation, the classic failure mode of next-token and next-scale AR models, can be mitigated by allowing every token to be rewritten at every step.
  • A single discrete-token backbone becomes a practical candidate for joint text–image–video modeling inside large language models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because HBQ already produces ordered coarse-to-fine bits, the same tokenizer could support progressive decoding or partial-quality streaming without retraining.
  • The fill–revise–erase loop is formally close to a masked diffusion process; the two families may therefore share the same distillation techniques for further speed-ups.
  • If the random-selection schedule remains stable at higher resolution, GRN-style models could become the default drop-in replacement for fixed-step diffusion backbones in production pipelines that care about per-sample latency.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Generative Refinement Networks (GRN), an autoregressive visual synthesis framework that combines Hierarchical Binary Quantization (HBQ) for near-lossless discrete tokenization with a global fill/refine/erase generation loop and entropy-guided adaptive sampling. HBQ maps continuous VAE features into multi-round binary labels whose reconstruction error decays exponentially (Eqs. 1–3, Alg. 1), yielding discrete image/video tokenizers that match continuous baselines at higher compression (Tables 1–2: 0.56 rFID on ImageNet; near-parity rFVD/PSNR for video). Generation starts from a random token map and iteratively updates a hybrid state Ft (Eq. 4) by predicting all tokens and randomly selecting a growing fraction lt of them (Eqs. 6, 9; Algs. 2–3), allowing both correction of prior mistakes and progressive filling. On ImageNet 256×256 the largest model reports 1.81 gFID; at 2 B scale the same architecture is competitive or superior to same-size AR and diffusion baselines on GenEval (T2I) and VBench (T2V). Code and models are released.

Significance. If the reported numbers hold under public re-implementation, the work supplies two concrete advances: (i) a discrete tokenizer that closes the long-standing reconstruction gap to continuous VAEs without expanding latent channels, and (ii) an AR generation loop that demonstrably mitigates irreversible error accumulation (Table 7). The combination yields new ImageNet records and competitive T2I/T2V results at modest scale, while the open release of tokenizers, models and training code makes the claims immediately falsifiable and extensible. The entropy-aware schedule further offers a practical route to complexity-adaptive compute that diffusion models currently lack. These contributions are of clear interest to the visual generation community.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that the global refinement loop “progressively perfects and corrects” (Abstract, §3.2, Alg. 3) rests on training–inference consistency of uniform random selection (Eqs. 4–6). Table 7 shows that pure masking collapses on the 130 M C2I model, establishing that erasure is essential, yet the paper never measures the actual frequency of fill / refine / erase operations during successful sampling, nor does it report any scaling experiment that multiplies spatial/temporal token count by the 4–100× factors required for 1024^{2} images or multi-second video. Without that evidence the error-correction property remains an extrapolation beyond the regimes where the headline numbers were obtained; a short diagnostic (e.g., fraction of tokens overwritten after step t0, or FID vs. token count) would make the claim load-bearing rather than anecdotal.
  2. T2I results (Table 4) rely on a proprietary high-quality fine-tune set whose size and composition are not disclosed (§4.3). While the pre-training corpus is public, the final GenEval score of 0.76 cannot be reproduced from the released materials alone. Either release a public fine-tune subset or report the same metrics after pre-training only, so that the contribution of the proprietary stage can be isolated.
minor comments (5)
  1. Eq. (9) for the entropy schedule introduces free parameters k, b, t0, α whose sensitivity is only partially ablated (Table 11). A one-sentence statement of the default values used for all main tables would improve reproducibility.
  2. Figure 2 and the surrounding text claim “theoretically near-lossless” quantization; the exponential bound is correct, yet the practical gap to continuous reconstruction still depends on M and λ_GAN (Table 2, Appendix E.1). Soften the wording to “exponentially vanishing quantization error.”
  3. In Table 3 the IS of GRN-G (299.0) is lower than several smaller models; a brief remark on the FID–IS trade-off under the chosen CFG schedule would help readers interpret the ranking.
  4. Appendix E.2 (confidence vs. random selection) is important but buried; a one-sentence pointer in the main text of §3.2 would strengthen the design justification for random St.
  5. Typographical: “V AEs”, “V AR”, “re-writer” appear inconsistently; standardize to “VAEs”, “VAR”, “rewriter”.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: HBQ error bound and GRN refinement are self-contained constructions; all SOTA claims are external benchmark measurements, not reductions of fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is free of the listed circular patterns. Hierarchical Binary Quantization (Eqs. 1–3, Alg. 1) is a constructive signal transform whose exponential error decay e_j < 1/2^j follows immediately from the binary-tree centroids; reconstruction metrics (rFID 0.56, PSNR, etc.) are measured on held-out ImageNet/video data after training and are not algebraically forced by the definition. The generative loop (Eqs. 4–7, Algs. 2–3) trains a transformer to predict ground-truth tokens from a random mixture of ground-truth and noise tokens; inference simply re-uses the same mixture schedule with a monotonically increasing selection ratio l_t. The entropy schedule (Eqs. 8–9) computes observed predictive entropy at runtime and maps it to step count; it does not redefine complexity in terms of the reported FID/IS numbers. All headline numbers (1.81 gFID, GenEval 0.76, VBench 82.99) are standard external evaluations after training; none reduce by construction to a fitted free parameter. Self-citations (e.g., Infinity) appear only as related-work comparisons and are not load-bearing uniqueness theorems. Consequently the claimed “first-principles” improvements are ordinary empirical results of a self-contained architecture, not circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 3 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper is an empirical systems contribution. Its load-bearing mathematical claim is the exponential decay of quantization error under HBQ; everything else is architectural choice plus standard transformer training. Free parameters are the usual ML hyper-parameters plus the two schedule constants k,b. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • HBQ rounds M = 4 (main), 6/8 (ablation)
    Chosen by hand (M=4 for main results, ablated to 6/8); controls the reconstruction–compression trade-off.
  • entropy-schedule slope k and bias b = k=600, b=−547 (C2I)
    Hand-tuned (k=600, b=−547 for C2I) to keep total steps inside [Tmin,Tmax]; directly determine adaptive compute.
  • GAN loss weight λ_GAN = 0.005 (joint), 0.3 (image-only)
    Tuned (0.005 for joint tokenizer) to balance rFVD vs. PSNR; affects the released tokenizer quality.
  • CFG scale, interval and temperature τ = e.g. CFG=2.4, τ=1.23 for GRNbit-B
    Grid-searched per model size; required to reach the reported FID numbers.
axioms (3)
  • standard math Quantization error after j HBQ rounds is strictly less than 2^{-j} once features are tanh-bounded to (−1,1).
    Direct consequence of successive mid-point binary partitions (Eqs. 1–3); used to claim near-lossless reconstruction.
  • domain assumption Straight-through estimator gradients through the non-differentiable quantizer are sufficiently unbiased for stable VAE training.
    Standard discrete-tokenizer practice; never proved, only empirically successful.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform random mixing of ground-truth and random tokens during training induces a model that can both preserve and correct tokens at inference.
    Core training assumption (Alg. 2); supported only by the masking ablation, not by theory.
invented entities (2)
  • Hierarchical Binary Quantization (HBQ) independent evidence
    purpose: Produce discrete tokens whose reconstruction error decays exponentially without increasing latent channel count.
    New quantization primitive; independent evidence is the matching continuous rFID/rFVD numbers on public benchmarks.
  • Generative Refinement Network (global fill/refine/erase loop) independent evidence
    purpose: Allow an autoregressive model to correct earlier tokens rather than freeze them.
    Architectural construct; evidence is the large FID gap versus pure masking (Tab. 7).

reviewed 2026-07-12 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generative Refinement Networks for Visual Synthesis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VBTBECI4

@misc{pith2026260413030,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generative Refinement Networks for Visual Synthesis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VBTBECI4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.13030}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

While diffusion models dominate the field of visual generation, they are computationally inefficient, applying a uniform computational effort regardless of different complexity. In contrast, autoregressive (AR) models are inherently complexity-aware, as evidenced by their variable likelihoods, but are often hindered by lossy discrete tokenization and error accumulation. In this work, we introduce Generative Refinement Networks (GRN), a next-generation visual synthesis paradigm that addresses these issues. At its core, GRN addresses the discrete tokenization bottleneck through a theoretically near-lossless Hierarchical Binary Quantization (HBQ), achieving a reconstruction quality comparable to continuous counterparts. Built upon HBQ's latent space, GRN fundamentally upgrades AR generation with a global refinement mechanism that progressively perfects and corrects artworks -- like a human artist painting. Besides, GRN integrates an entropy-guided sampling strategy, enabling complexity-aware, adaptive-step generation without compromising visual quality. On the ImageNet benchmark, GRN establishes new records in image reconstruction (0.56 rFID) and class-conditional image generation (1.81 gFID). We also scale GRN to more challenging text-to-image and text-to-video generation, delivering superior performance on an equivalent scale. We release all models and code to foster further research on GRN.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13030 by Bingyue Peng, Jiahuan Wang, Jian Han, Jinlai Liu, Zehuan Yuan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Qualitative results for the class-to-image generation task. Abstract While diffusion models dominate the field of visual generation, they remain com￾putationally inefficient, as they allocate uniform computational effort to samples with varying levels of complexity. In contrast, autoregressive (AR) models are inherently complexity-aware, as evidenced by their variable likelihoods, but are often hindered by… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Hierarchical Binary Quantization. Each element from the VAE encoded features under￾goes several rounds of hierarchical binary quantization. The quantization error decays exponentially with the number of rounds, theoretically enabling lossless quantization to be achieved rapidly. 2.2 Autoregressive Models Inspired by large language models, [19, 50, 28, 55] explore visual generation via next-token prediction… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: An example of Hierarchical Binary Quantization (M=4). For q1, q2, and q3, we truncate the complete sequence and take the truncated parts for reconstruction. where δ(·) is a delta function with -1 when qi = 0 and 1 otherwise. Then we obtain the quantized binary labels {q1, q2, ..., qM}, where qj ∈ {0, 1} [1+T ,H/16,W/16,C] . Here M is the total round of hierarchical binary quantization. In this way, we perf… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Generative Refinement Framework. Starting from a random token map, GRN randomly selects more predictions at each step and refines all input tokens. For example, compared to the second step, the third step filled six new tokens (pink), kept two tokens (blue), erased two tokens (yellow), and left six tokens blank (gray). approach based on prediction confidence was also investigated for constructing St+1. How… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effect of HBQ rounds. 8-round configuration matches the continuous baseline. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative results of GRN (2B) on the text-to-video task. that both approaches achieve comparable performance. Specifically, for the smaller GRN-B model, predicting indices yields a slightly better FID score. Conversely, for the larger GRN-L model, predict￾ing bits proves superior, achieving a lower FID of 2.47 compared to 2.64. This suggests that GRN is well-suited for both prediction formats on the clas… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Predict Indices vs. Predict Bits on the T2V generation task. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Complexity-Aware Sampling: T2I Qualitative Results. 4.5.2 Global Refinement Mechanism [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Complexity-Aware Sampling. We evaluate the efficacy of our complexity-aware sampling on GRNbit-B, with hyperparameters set to k = 600, b = −547. Following standard settings in diffusion models, we set the maximum number of refinement steps to Tmax = 50. To strike a balance between performance and efficiency, we empirically set the minimum number of steps to Tmin = 20. We synthesize 63K images and plot the … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between GRN with other autoregressive models in visual generation. With the global refinement mechanism, GRN iteratively revises and enhances the entire visual representation, effectively mitigating the error propagation issue in conventional autoregressive models. trained for 150K under 256×256 resolution and 60K iterations under 1024×1024 resolution with batch sizes of 15400 and 2048, respect… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of Absolute and Relative Bit Prediction. E.4 Decoding Hyper-Parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Influence of decoding hyper-parameters: τ , CFG, and CFG start pt. F More Qualitative Results F.1 C2I Qualitative Results Similar to JiT [32], we present uncurated 256×256 samples generated by GRN-G in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Uncurated 256×256 samples from GRN-G on ImageNet. To ensure representative results, these images are generated using the same parameters that yielded our reported FID of 1.81 (CFG scale = 1.7, CFG interval = [0.3, 1.0]), rather than using a higher CFG scale typically favored for visualization. F.2 T2I Qualitative Results In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: More qualitative results for the text-to-image generation task. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: More qualitative results for the text-to-video generation task. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: More qualitative results for the text-to-video generation task. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_16.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Token-Level Cross-Entropy: Fr\'echet Distributional Post-Training for Autoregressive Image Generation

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    FD-loss post-training with detached rollout replay and a probability-level straight-through estimator improves FID and FD_r6 across eight ImageNet configurations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 35 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Achiam, S

    J. Achiam, S. Adler, S. Agarwal, L. Ahmad, I. Akkaya, F. L. Aleman, D. Almeida, J. Altenschmidt, S. Altman, S. Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [3]

    Y . Ai, J. Han, S. Zhuang, W. Mao, X. Hu, Z. Yang, Z. Yang, H. Huang, X. Yue, and H. Chen. Bitdance: Scaling autoregressive generative models with binary tokens.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.14041, 2026. 8, 9

    arXiv 2026

  3. [4]

    Brooks, B

    T. Brooks, B. Peebles, C. Holmes, W. DePue, Y . Guo, L. Jing, D. Schnurr, J. Taylor, T. Luhman, E. Luhman, C. Ng, R. Wang, and A. Ramesh. Video generation models as world simulators.OpenAI, 2024. 1, 3

    2024

  4. [5]

    H. Cai, S. Cao, R. Du, P. Gao, S. Hoi, Z. Hou, S. Huang, D. Jiang, X. Jin, L. Li, et al. Z-image: An efficient image generation foundation model with single-stream diffusion transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.22699, 2025. 8, 9 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [6]

    Q. Cai, Y . Li, Y . Pan, T. Yao, and T. Mei. Hidream-i1: An open-source high-efficient image generative foundation model. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 13636–13639. ACM, 2025. 8, 9

    2025

  6. [7]

    Chang, H

    H. Chang, H. Zhang, L. Jiang, C. Liu, and W. T. Freeman. Maskgit: Masked generative image transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11315– 11325, 2022. 2, 3, 7, 8, 11, 17

    2022

  7. [8]

    H. Chen, M. Xia, Y . He, Y . Zhang, X. Cun, S. Yang, J. Xing, Y . Liu, Q. Chen, X. Wang, et al. Videocrafter1: Open diffusion models for high-quality video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19512, 2023. 8, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [9]

    J. Chen, J. Yu, C. Ge, L. Yao, E. Xie, Y . Wu, Z. Wang, J. Kwok, P. Luo, H. Lu, et al. Pixart: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00426, 2023. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [10]

    J. Chen, D. Zou, W. He, J. Chen, E. Xie, S. Han, and H. Cai. Dc-ae 1.5: Accelerating diffusion model convergence with structured latent space. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 19628–19637, 2025. 7

    2025

  10. [11]

    X. Chen, Z. Wu, X. Liu, Z. Pan, W. Liu, Z. Xie, X. Yu, and C. Ruan. Janus-pro: Unified multimodal understanding and generation with data and model scaling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17811, 2025. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [12]

    Dehghani, B

    M. Dehghani, B. Mustafa, J. Djolonga, J. Heek, M. Minderer, M. Caron, A. Steiner, J. Puigcerver, R. Geirhos, I. M. Alabdulmohsin, et al. Patch n’pack: Navit, a vision transformer for any aspect ratio and resolution.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:2252–2274, 2023. 17

    2023

  12. [13]

    C. Deng, D. Zhu, K. Li, C. Gou, F. Li, Z. Wang, S. Zhong, W. Yu, X. Nie, Z. Song, G. Shi, and H. Fan. Emerging properties in unified multimodal pretraining.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14683, 2025. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [14]

    H. Deng, T. Pan, H. Diao, Z. Luo, Y . Cui, H. Lu, S. Shan, Y . Qi, and X. Wang. Autoregressive video generation without vector quantization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14169, 2024. 8, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [15]

    H. Deng, T. Pan, F. Zhang, Y . Liu, Z. Luo, Y . Cui, W. Wang, C. Shen, S. Shan, Z. Zhang, et al. Uniform discrete diffusion with metric path for video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24717, 2025. 8, 9

    arXiv 2025

  15. [16]

    J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee,

  16. [17]

    Devlin, M.-W

    J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding.arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018. 2, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [18]

    Esser, S

    P. Esser, S. Kulal, A. Blattmann, R. Entezari, J. Müller, H. Saini, Y . Levi, D. Lorenz, A. Sauer, F. Boesel, et al. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. InForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024. 3, 7, 8, 9

    2024

  18. [19]

    Esser, R

    P. Esser, R. Rombach, and B. Ommer. Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 12873–12883,

  19. [20]

    Y . Gao, L. Gong, Q. Guo, X. Hou, Z. Lai, F. Li, L. Li, X. Lian, C. Liao, L. Liu, et al. Seedream 3.0 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11346, 2025. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [21]

    Ghosh, H

    D. Ghosh, H. Hajishirzi, and L. Schmidt. Geneval: An object-focused framework for evaluating text-to- image alignment.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 7, 9

    2024

  21. [22]

    Y . Guo, Q. Gan, Y . Zhang, J. Liu, Y . Hu, P. Xie, D. Qian, Y . Zhang, R. Li, Y . Zhang, R. Lu, X. Mei, B. Han, X. Yin, B. Peng, and Z. Yuan. Alive: Animate your world with lifelike audio-video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08682, 2026. 1

    arXiv 2026

  22. [23]

    Y . Guo, C. Yang, A. Rao, Z. Liang, Y . Wang, Y . Qiao, M. Agrawala, D. Lin, and B. Dai. Animated- iff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023. 8, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [24]

    A. Haar. Zur theorie der orthogonalen funktionensysteme.Mathematische Annalen, 69(3):331–371, 1910. 3

    1910

  24. [25]

    J. Han, H. Chen, Y . Zhao, H. Wang, Q. Zhao, Z. Yang, H. He, X. Yue, and L. Jiang. Vision as a dialect: Unifying visual understanding and generation via text-aligned representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18898, 2025. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [26]

    J. Han, J. Liu, Y . Jiang, B. Yan, Y . Zhang, Z. Yuan, B. Peng, and X. Liu. Infinity: Scaling bitwise autoregressive modeling for high-resolution image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04431, 2024. 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [27]

    Heusel, H

    M. Heusel, H. Ramsauer, T. Unterthiner, B. Nessler, and S. Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30,

  27. [28]

    Kondratyuk, L

    D. Kondratyuk, L. Yu, X. Gu, J. Lezama, J. Huang, G. Schindler, R. Hornung, V . Birodkar, J. Yan, M.-C. Chiu, K. Somandepalli, H. Akbari, Y . Alon, Y . Cheng, J. Dillon, A. Gupta, M. Hahn, A. Hauth, D. Hendon, A. Martinez, D. Minnen, M. Sirotenko, K. Sohn, X. Yang, H. Adam, M.-H. Yang, I. Essa, H. Wang, D. A. Ross, B. Seybold, and L. Jiang. Videopoet: A l...

    2024

  28. [29]

    W. Kong, Q. Tian, Z. Zhang, R. Min, Z. Dai, J. Zhou, J. Xiong, X. Li, B. Wu, J. Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024. 1, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    Kuznetsova, H

    A. Kuznetsova, H. Rom, N. Alldrin, J. Uijlings, I. Krasin, J. Pont-Tuset, S. Kamali, S. Popov, M. Malloci, A. Kolesnikov, et al. The open images dataset v4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scale.International Journal of Computer Vision, 128(7):1956–1981, 2020. 6, 17

    1956

  30. [31]

    B. F. Labs. Flux.https://blackforestlabs.ai/announcing-black-forest-labs/, 2024. 3, 9 13

    2024

  31. [32]

    Li and K

    T. Li and K. He. Back to basics: Let denoising generative models denoise.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.13720,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [33]

    T. Li, Y . Tian, H. Li, M. Deng, and K. He. Autoregressive image generation without vector quantization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:56424–56445, 2024. 8

    2024

  33. [34]

    A. Liu, B. Feng, B. Xue, B. Wang, B. Wu, C. Lu, C. Zhao, C. Deng, C. Zhang, C. Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [35]

    J. Liu, J. Han, B. Yan, H. Wu, F. Zhu, X. Wang, Y . Jiang, B. Peng, and Z. Yuan. Infinitystar: Unified spacetime autoregressive modeling for visual generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04675, 2025. 8, 9

    arXiv 2025

  35. [36]

    Z. Luo, F. Shi, Y . Ge, Y . Yang, L. Wang, and Y . Shan. Open-magvit2: An open-source project toward democratizing auto-regressive visual generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04410, 2024. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [37]

    N. Ma, M. Goldstein, M. S. Albergo, N. M. Boffi, E. Vanden-Eijnden, and S. Xie. Sit: Exploring flow and diffusion-based generative models with scalable interpolant transformers. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 23–40. Springer, 2024. 7, 8

    2024

  37. [38]

    Y . Ma, X. Liu, X. Chen, W. Liu, C. Wu, Z. Wu, Z. Pan, Z. Xie, H. Zhang, X. Yu, et al. Janusflow: Harmonizing autoregression and rectified flow for unified multimodal understanding and generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7739–7751,

  38. [39]

    Mentzer, D

    F. Mentzer, D. Minnen, E. Agustsson, and M. Tschannen. Finite scalar quantization: Vq-vae made simple. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15505, 2023. 2, 16

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [40]

    Introducing gpt-4o image generation

    OpenAI. Introducing gpt-4o image generation. https://openai.com/zh-Hans-CN/index/ introducing-4o-image-generation/, 2025. Accessed: 2025-03-05. 9

    2025

  40. [41]

    Ouyang, J

    L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. Wainwright, P. Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, A. Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730–27744, 2022. 2

    2022

  41. [42]

    Z. Pang, T. Zhang, F. Luan, Y . Man, H. Tan, K. Zhang, W. T. Freeman, and Y .-X. Wang. Randar: Decoder- only autoregressive visual generation in random orders. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 45–55, 2025. 8

    2025

  42. [43]

    Peebles and S

    W. Peebles and S. Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023. 1, 7, 8

    2023

  43. [44]

    Podell, Z

    D. Podell, Z. English, K. Lacey, A. Blattmann, T. Dockhorn, J. Müller, J. Penna, and R. Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [45]

    Q. Qin, L. Zhuo, Y . Xin, R. Du, Z. Li, B. Fu, Y . Lu, J. Yuan, X. Li, D. Liu, et al. Lumina-image 2.0: A unified and efficient image generative framework.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21758, 2025. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [46]

    Qwen-image technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324, 2025

    Qwen-Image Team. Qwen-image technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324, 2025. 8, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [47]

    Rombach, A

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2, 6

    2022

  47. [48]

    Salimans, I

    T. Salimans, I. Goodfellow, W. Zaremba, V . Cheung, A. Radford, and X. Chen. Improved techniques for training gans.Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016. 8

    2016

  48. [49]

    Shenoy, Y

    A. Shenoy, Y . Lu, S. Jayakumar, D. Chatterjee, M. Moslehpour, P. Chuang, A. Harpale, V . Bhardwaj, D. Xu, S. Zhao, L. Zhao, A. Ramchandani, X. L. Dong, and A. Kumar. Lumos : Empowering multimodal llms with scene text recognition, 2024. 8, 9

    2024

  49. [50]

    P. Sun, Y . Jiang, S. Chen, S. Zhang, B. Peng, P. Luo, and Z. Yuan. Autoregressive model beats diffusion: Llama for scalable image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06525, 2024. 3, 6, 7, 8, 17

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [51]

    N. Team, C. Han, G. Li, J. Wu, Q. Sun, Y . Cai, Y . Peng, Z. Ge, D. Zhou, H. Tang, et al. Nextstep-1: Toward autoregressive image generation with continuous tokens at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10711, 2025. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [52]

    K. Tian, Y . Jiang, Z. Yuan, B. Peng, and L. Wang. Visual autoregressive modeling: Scalable image generation via next-scale prediction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02905, 2024. 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 17

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [53]

    Van Den Oord, O

    A. Van Den Oord, O. Vinyals, et al. Neural discrete representation learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 2

    2017

  53. [54]

    A. Wang, B. Ai, B. Wen, C. Mao, C.-W. Xie, D. Chen, F. Yu, H. Zhao, J. Yang, J. Zeng, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025. 3, 6, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    J. Wang, Y . Chen, J. Yu, G. Lu, and W. Pei. Editinfinity: Image editing with binary-quantized generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20217, 2025. 3

    arXiv 2025

  55. [56]

    X. Wang, X. Zhang, Z. Luo, Q. Sun, Y . Cui, J. Wang, F. Zhang, Y . Wang, Z. Li, Q. Yu, et al. Emu3: Next-token prediction is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18869, 2024. 2, 8, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [57]

    J. Xie, Z. Yang, and M. Z. Shou. Show-o2: Improved native unified multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15564, 2025. 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [58]

    W. Yan, Y . Zhang, P. Abbeel, and A. Srinivas. Videogpt: Video generation using vq-vae and transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10157, 2021. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [59]

    Z. Yang, J. Teng, W. Zheng, M. Ding, S. Huang, J. Xu, Y . Yang, W. Hong, X. Zhang, G. Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072,

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [60]

    T. Yin, M. Gharbi, T. Park, R. Zhang, E. Shechtman, F. Durand, and B. Freeman. Improved distribu- tion matching distillation for fast image synthesis.Advances in neural information processing systems, 14 37:47455–47487, 2024. 3

    2024

  60. [61]

    T. Yin, M. Gharbi, R. Zhang, E. Shechtman, F. Durand, W. T. Freeman, and T. Park. One-step diffusion with distribution matching distillation, 2024.URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2311.18828. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  61. [62]

    S. Yu, S. Kwak, H. Jang, J. Jeong, J. Huang, J. Shin, and S. Xie. Representation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06940, 2024. 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [63]

    D. J. Zhang, J. Z. Wu, J.-W. Liu, R. Zhao, L. Ran, Y . Gu, D. Gao, and M. Z. Shou. Show-1: Marrying pixel and latent diffusion models for text-to-video generation.International Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–15, 2024. 8, 9

    2024

  63. [64]

    Zhang, Z

    H. Zhang, Z. Wu, Z. Xing, J. Shao, and Y .-G. Jiang. Adadiff: adaptive step selection for fast diffusion models. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 39, pages 9914–9922,

  64. [65]

    Zhang, H

    Y . Zhang, H. Yang, Y . Zhang, Y . Hu, F. Zhu, C. Lin, X. Mei, Y . Jiang, B. Peng, and Z. Yuan. Waver: Wave your way to lifelike video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.15761, 2025. 1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [66]

    Y . Zhao, Y . Xiong, and P. Krähenbühl. Image and video tokenization with binary spherical quantization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07548, 2024. 2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  66. [67]

    Zheng, N

    B. Zheng, N. Ma, S. Tong, and S. Xie. Diffusion transformers with representation autoencoders.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11690, 2025. 6, 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  67. [68]

    Zheng, X

    Z. Zheng, X. Peng, T. Yang, C. Shen, S. Li, H. Liu, Y . Zhou, T. Li, and Y . You. Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20404, 2024. 8, 9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [69]

    C. Zhou, L. Yu, A. Babu, K. Tirumala, M. Yasunaga, L. Shamis, J. Kahn, X. Ma, L. Zettlemoyer, and O. Levy. Transfusion: Predict the next token and diffuse images with one multi-modal model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11039, 2024. 12 15 A Algorithm for Hierarchical Binary Quantization We outline the procedure for our proposed Hierarchical Binary Quantization...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.5 on July 12, 2026.