pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14022 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Crystal structure effects on vortex dynamics in superconducting MgB₂ thin films

Clemens Schmid , Anton Pokusinskyi , Markus Gruber , Corentin Pfaff , Theo Courtois , Alexander Kasatkin , Karine Dumesnil , Stephane Mangin
show 2 more authors
Thomas Hauet Oleksandr Dobrovolskiy
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords MgB2 thin filmsvortex dynamicsresistive transitionnormal domainsflux flow instabilitypinning activation energymicrostructural defectssuperconducting devices
0
0 comments X

The pith

Normal domain formation and growth, not flux-flow instabilities, drive the resistive transition in MgB2 films.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares vortex behavior in two MgB2 thin films that differ in microstructure: one textured film with columnar growth and one single-crystal film with buffer-layer roughness. Current-voltage measurements at about one-quarter of the critical temperature reveal stepped resistive transitions in both. Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations match the main features of these curves and indicate that the transitions occur through the appearance and expansion of normal domains rather than through flux-flow instabilities. The single-crystal film sustains higher currents before superconductivity breaks down and shows pinning activation energies roughly twice as large, which the authors trace to lateral variations in the superconducting order parameter along the buffer interface together with its lower thermal boundary resistance.

Core claim

Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations reproduce the major features of the experimental I-V curves and indicate that resistive transitions in both the textured and single-crystal MgB2 films are mediated by the formation and growth of normal domains. The single-crystal film exhibits superconductivity breakdown at higher currents, pinning activation energies approximately twice those of the textured film, and more pronounced multi-step features in the I-V curves; these differences are attributed to stronger pinning from lateral order-parameter variations along the MgO buffer layer combined with its lower thermal boundary resistance.

What carries the argument

Formation and growth of normal domains in the presence of microstructural defects, as modeled by time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations.

If this is right

  • Both film microstructure and the film-buffer interface control the onset and character of dissipation at high transport currents.
  • Single-crystal films with buffer-layer roughness can sustain higher currents before breakdown and exhibit stronger effective pinning.
  • Engineering lateral variations in the order parameter offers a route to controlled dissipation in fluxonic devices and detectors.
  • The same normal-domain mechanism appears in both columnar-growth and buffer-roughness films, suggesting it is robust across common MgB2 deposition methods.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Device designers could deliberately introduce controlled buffer roughness to raise the current at which dissipation begins.
  • If normal-domain growth dominates, thermal boundary resistance becomes a tunable parameter for managing hot-spot formation in single-photon detectors.
  • The multi-step I-V features may correspond to successive domain nucleation sites whose spacing reflects the defect length scale, offering a possible diagnostic for film quality.

Load-bearing premise

The differences in I-V behavior, pinning energies, and breakdown currents arise solely from the described microstructural defects and that the simulations capture all relevant physics without unmodeled effects such as local heating variations.

What would settle it

Direct imaging or local probes that detect flux-flow signatures or significant local heating inconsistent with the simulated normal-domain growth would falsify the claim that domain formation mediates the transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14022 by Alexander Kasatkin, Anton Pokusinskyi, Clemens Schmid, Corentin Pfaff, Karine Dumesnil, Markus Gruber, Oleksandr Dobrovolskiy, Stephane Mangin, Theo Courtois, Thomas Hauet.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. RHEED patterns obtained upon sample in-plane rota [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the resistivity for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Pinning activation energy for the single-crystal and tex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the I-V curves for both films in mag￾netic fields up to 2 T at 0.25Tc. At low fields, the I￾V curves of sample S display a zero-voltage plateau with a well-defined critical current which decreases from Ic ≈ 12 mA to about 2 mA, with increase of the magnetic field from 0 to 2 T. Here, Ic is deduced using a voltage criterion of 100 nV. The steepness of the I-V curves en￾sures that small variations in t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. TDGL simulations of the current-driven resistive transition. Panels (a) and (c) show the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The current-driven resistive transition is central to superconducting single-photon detectors, transition-edge sensors, and fluxonic devices. Depending on sample uniformity, dimensions, and heat removal, it can be driven by phase-slip events, flux-flow instabilities (FFI), or normal-domain formation. Here, we investigate the influence of two types of microstructural defects on vortex dynamics in MgB$_2$ films: columnar growth in textured films and buffer-layer roughness in single-crystal films. The current-voltage ($I$-$V$) curves measured at $T \approx 0.25 T_\mathrm{c}$ for both films exhibit multiple steps. Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau simulations reproduce the major features of the experimental $I$-$V$ curves and suggest that the resistive transitions for both films are mediated by the formation and growth of normal domains rather than FFI. The single-crystal film with buffer-layer roughness exhibits superconductivity breakdown at higher currents and pinning activation energies approximately twice those of the textured film, along with more pronounced multi-step features in the $I$-$V$ curves. These features are attributed to the combination of stronger pinning induced by lateral variations of the superconducting order parameter along the MgO buffer layer and its lower thermal boundary resistance. Our results show that both the film microstructure and the film-buffer interface are critical for the resistive transition, offering insights for superconducting devices requiring controlled dissipation at high transport currents.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the effects of two microstructural defects—columnar growth in textured MgB2 films and buffer-layer roughness in single-crystal films—on vortex dynamics and the current-driven resistive transition at T ≈ 0.25 Tc. Experimental I-V curves for both films display multiple steps. Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) simulations are reported to reproduce the major I-V features, supporting the interpretation that resistive transitions proceed via formation and growth of normal domains rather than flux-flow instability (FFI). The single-crystal film exhibits higher breakdown currents, pinning activation energies roughly twice those of the textured film, and more pronounced steps, which are attributed to stronger pinning from lateral order-parameter variations along the MgO buffer and lower thermal boundary resistance. The work concludes that both microstructure and film-buffer interface are critical for controlling dissipation in superconducting devices.

Significance. If the TDGL results hold under full scrutiny, the paper provides concrete evidence that microstructure engineering (columnar defects vs. buffer roughness) can tune pinning energies, breakdown currents, and the mechanism of resistive transition in MgB2, offering practical guidance for devices such as single-photon detectors and fluxonic elements that operate near the onset of dissipation. The cross-check between experiment and simulation is a positive element, though its strength depends on the completeness of the simulation details.

major comments (3)
  1. [TDGL Simulations] TDGL Simulations section (and associated methods): The manuscript states that TDGL simulations reproduce the major features of the experimental I-V curves and favor normal-domain formation over FFI, but provides no explicit values for key parameters (e.g., coherence length ξ, penetration depth λ, thermal conductivity κ, or heat capacity C), no description of the pinning landscape implementation (how columnar growth or buffer roughness is modeled), and no quantitative metrics (RMS error, χ², or step-position agreement) comparing simulated and measured I-V traces. This information is load-bearing for the central claim that the simulations securely distinguish the mechanism.
  2. [Results and Discussion] Results and Discussion (paragraph discussing pinning activation energies): The claim that the single-crystal film has pinning activation energies approximately twice those of the textured film is presented without the underlying Arrhenius plots, temperature range used for extraction, or error bars on the extracted U values. Because the factor-of-two difference is used to link microstructure to stronger pinning, the absence of these details weakens the quantitative support for the attribution.
  3. [Abstract and Introduction] Abstract and Introduction (discussion of local heating): The text notes that local Joule heating is a controlling factor in the resistive transition, yet the TDGL implementation is not stated to include self-consistent coupling to the heat equation. If heating is approximated or omitted, the simulated multi-step features could be consistent with either normal-domain growth or an incompletely modeled FFI scenario, directly affecting the mechanism assignment.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions for I-V curves and simulation snapshots should explicitly state the current-sweep direction, temperature, and whether the plotted voltage is time-averaged or instantaneous to allow direct comparison with experiment.
  2. [Notation] Notation for pinning energy U(T) should be clarified: specify whether the reported values are effective activation energies from fits to the Arrhenius form or derived from a specific model (e.g., collective pinning).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important areas where additional details and clarifications will improve the rigor and transparency of our work. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: TDGL Simulations section (and associated methods): The manuscript states that TDGL simulations reproduce the major features of the experimental I-V curves and favor normal-domain formation over FFI, but provides no explicit values for key parameters (e.g., coherence length ξ, penetration depth λ, thermal conductivity κ, or heat capacity C), no description of the pinning landscape implementation (how columnar growth or buffer roughness is modeled), and no quantitative metrics (RMS error, χ², or step-position agreement) comparing simulated and measured I-V traces. This information is load-bearing for the central claim that the simulations securely distinguish the mechanism.

    Authors: We agree that the TDGL section requires more explicit documentation to support the mechanism assignment. In the revised manuscript we will add the specific parameter values employed (ξ, λ, κ, C and related quantities), describe the numerical implementation of the pinning landscapes (columnar defects modeled as extended line pins and buffer roughness as spatially varying suppression of the order parameter), and include quantitative comparison metrics such as step-position agreement and RMS deviation between simulated and measured I-V traces. These additions will be placed in the TDGL Simulations section and the Methods. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results and Discussion (paragraph discussing pinning activation energies): The claim that the single-crystal film has pinning activation energies approximately twice those of the textured film is presented without the underlying Arrhenius plots, temperature range used for extraction, or error bars on the extracted U values. Because the factor-of-two difference is used to link microstructure to stronger pinning, the absence of these details weakens the quantitative support for the attribution.

    Authors: We accept that the supporting information for the pinning energies was insufficient. The revised manuscript will include the Arrhenius plots for both films, state the temperature interval used for the linear fits (near 0.25 Tc), and report the uncertainties obtained from the fits. These additions will provide the quantitative foundation for the reported factor-of-two difference and its microstructural interpretation. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Abstract and Introduction (discussion of local heating): The text notes that local Joule heating is a controlling factor in the resistive transition, yet the TDGL implementation is not stated to include self-consistent coupling to the heat equation. If heating is approximated or omitted, the simulated multi-step features could be consistent with either normal-domain growth or an incompletely modeled FFI scenario, directly affecting the mechanism assignment.

    Authors: The TDGL simulations were performed under the isothermal approximation to isolate the vortex and order-parameter dynamics responsible for normal-domain formation. The multi-step I-V structure emerges from the sequential nucleation and expansion of these domains. While self-consistent electro-thermal coupling is not included, the experimental contrast between the two films (different thermal boundary resistances and breakdown currents) provides independent support for the domain-growth picture. In the revision we will explicitly note the isothermal character of the TDGL model, discuss the limitations of the approximation, and clarify how the experimental observations complement the simulations to distinguish normal-domain growth from FFI. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports independent experimental I-V measurements on two MgB2 films differing in microstructure (columnar growth vs. buffer roughness), extracts pinning activation energies from those data, and compares the curves to standard TDGL simulations that reproduce the multi-step features. The attribution of resistive transitions to normal-domain growth rather than FFI follows directly from this match and from the observed differences in breakdown currents and pinning strengths; no step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on a self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem. The central claims remain falsifiable against the external I-V data and are not tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the applicability of time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory to model vortex dynamics and normal-domain formation in these films, plus the assumption that the two film types differ primarily in the stated microstructural features.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations accurately describe the evolution of the superconducting order parameter and vortex motion under applied current in MgB2 thin films at 0.25 Tc.
    Invoked to reproduce experimental I-V curves and identify the resistive-transition mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1406 out tokens · 45073 ms · 2026-05-10T12:11:05.912611+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Crystal structure effects on vortex dynamics in superconducting MgB$_2$ thin films

    while for N domains [9] and phase slips [19] multi- ple voltage transitions are usually observed [11, 20]. ∗ Corresponding author: c.schmid@univie.ac.at In the FFI framework, the voltageV ∗ measured just before the resistance jump defines the maximal vortex velocity,v ∗ =V ∗/(BL), whereBis the magnetic flux density andLthe voltage-lead separation. NearT c...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    G. N. Gol’tsman, O. Okunev, G. Chulkova, A. Lipatov, A. Semenov, K. Smirnov, B. V oronov, A. Dzardanov, C. Williams, and R. Sobolewski, Picosecond supercon- ducting single-photon optical detector, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 705 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    L ¨osch, A

    S. L ¨osch, A. Alfonsov, O. V . Dobrovolskiy, R. Keil, V . En- gemaier, S. Baunack, G. Li, O. G. Schmidt, and D. B¨urger, Microwave radiation detection with an ultra-thin free- standing superconducting niobium nanohelix, ACS Nano 13, 2948 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Cattaneo, A

    R. Cattaneo, A. E. Efimov, K. I. Shiianov, O. Kieler, and V . M. Krasnov, Cascade switching current detectors based on arrays of Josephson junctions, Nat. Commun.16, 7927 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Dobrovolskiy, D

    O. Dobrovolskiy, D. V odolazov, F. Porrati, R. Sachser, V . Bevz, M. Mikhailov, A. Chumak, and M. Huth, Ultra- fast vortex motion in a direct-write Nb-C superconductor, Nat. Commun.11, 3291 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity(Mineola, New York, 2004)

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity(Mineola, New York, 2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Ruizet al., Critical current density in advanced super- conductors, Progr

    H. Ruizet al., Critical current density in advanced super- conductors, Progr. Mater. Sci.155, 101492 (2026)

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    D. Y . V odolazov, Photon detection by superconduct- ing nanowires: A time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau ap- proach, Phys. Rev. Appl.7, 034014 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Barone and G

    A. Barone and G. Patterno,Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1982)

    work page 1982

  10. [10]

    Reymond, L

    S. Reymond, L. Antognazza, M. Decroux, E. Koller, P. Reinert, and O. Fischer, Current-induced highly dis- sipative domains in high-T c thin films, Phys. Rev. B66, 014522 (2002)

    work page 2002

  11. [11]

    Dobrovolskiy, Fast dynamics of vortices in supercon- ductors, inEncycl

    O. Dobrovolskiy, Fast dynamics of vortices in supercon- ductors, inEncycl. Cond. Matt. Phys.(Elsevier, Amster- dam, 2024) p. 735

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    A. G. Sivakov, A. M. Glukhov, A. N. Omelyanchouk, Y . Koval, P. M¨uller, and A. V . Ustinov, Josephson be- havior of phase-slip lines in wide superconducting strips, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 267001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    Adami, Z

    O.-A. Adami, Z. L. Jelic, C. Xue, M. Abdel-Hafiez, B. Hackens, V . V . Moshchalkov, M. V . Milosevic, J. Van de V ondel, and A. V . Silhanek, Onset, evolu- tion, and magnetic braking of vortex lattice instabilities in nanostructured superconducting films, Phys. Rev. B92, 134506 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Embonet al., Imaging of super-fast dynamics and flow instabilities of superconducting vortices, Nat

    L. Embonet al., Imaging of super-fast dynamics and flow instabilities of superconducting vortices, Nat. Commun. 8, 85 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Bezuglyj, V

    A. Bezuglyj, V . Shklovskij, R. V ovk, V . Bevz, M. Huth, and O. Dobrovolskiy, Local flux-flow instability in super- conducting films nearTc, Phys. Rev. B99, 174518 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    V . Bevz, M. Mikhailov, B. Budinsk´a, S. Lamb-Camarena, S. Shpilinska, A. Chumak, M. Urb ´anek, M. Arndt, W. Lang, and O. Dobrovolskiy, V ortex counting and ve- locimetry for slitted superconducting thin strips, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 034098 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    B. I. Ivlev and N. B. Kopnin, Dynamical processes in current-carrying superconductors, Physica B+C126, 346 (1984)

    work page 1984

  18. [18]

    M. V . Sidorova, A. G. Kozorezov, A. V . Semenov, Y . P. Korneeva, M. Y . Mikhailov, A. Y . Devizenko, A. A. Ko- rneev, G. M. Chulkova, and G. N. Goltsman, Nonbolo- metric bottleneck in electron-phonon relaxation in ultra- thin WSi films, Phys. Rev. B97, 184512 (2018). 10

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Larkin and Y

    A. Larkin and Y . Ovchinnikov, Nonlinear conductivity of superconductors in the mixed state, Sov. Phys. JETP41, 960 (1976)

    work page 1976

  20. [20]

    J. Buh, V . Kabanov, V . Baranov, A. Mrzel, A. Koviˇc, and D. Mihailovic, Control of switching between metastable superconducting states inδ-MoN nanowires, Nat. Com- mun.6, 10250 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    I. V . Zolochevskii, Resistive states in wide superconduct- ing films induced by dc and ac currents (review article), Low Temp. Phys.40, 867 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    M. N. Kunchur, Unstable flux flow due to heated elec- trons in superconducting films, Physical Review Letters 89, 137005 (2002)

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    Budinsk ´aet al., Rising speed limits for fluxons via edge-quality improvement in wide MoSi thin films, Phys

    B. Budinsk ´aet al., Rising speed limits for fluxons via edge-quality improvement in wide MoSi thin films, Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 034072 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    R. J. Watts-Tobin, Y . Kr ¨ahenb¨uhl, and L. Kramer, Nonequilibrium theory of dirty, current-carrying super- conductors: phase-slip oscillators in narrow filaments nearT c, J. Low Temp. Phys.42, 459 (1981)

    work page 1981

  25. [25]

    A. V . Silhanek, A. Leo, G. Grimaldi, G. R. Berdiyorov, M. V . Milosevic, A. Nigro, S. Pace, N. Verellen, W. Gilli- jns, V . Metlushko, B. Ili´c, X. Zhu, and V . V . Moshchalkov, Influence of artificial pinning on vortex lattice instabil- ity in superconducting films, New J. Phys.14, 053006 (2012)

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    A. V . Gurevich and R. G. Mints, Sov. Phys. Usp.27, 19 (1984)

    work page 1984

  27. [27]

    A. I. Bezuglyj and V . A. Shklovskij, Thermal do- mains in inhomogeneous current-carrying superconduc- tors. Current-voltage characteristics and dynamics of do- main formation after current jumps, J. Low Temp. Phys. 57, 227 (1984)

    work page 1984

  28. [28]

    Dobrovolskiy, V

    O. Dobrovolskiy, V . Bevz, E. Begun, R. Sachser, R. V ovk, and M. Huth, Fast dynamics of guided magnetic flux quanta, Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 054064 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Dobrovolskiy, Q

    O. Dobrovolskiy, Q. Wang, D. V odolazov, R. Sachser, M. Huth, S. Knauer, and A. Buzdin, Moving Abrikosov vortex lattices generate sub-40-nm magnons, Nat. Nan- otechn.20, 1764 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    A. V . Silhanek, L. Jiang, C. Xue, and B. Vanderheyden, Impact of border defects on the magnetic flux penetration in superconducting films, Appl. Phys. Rev.12, 041324 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Nagamatsu, N

    J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagawa, T. Muranaka, Y . Zenitani, and J. Akimitsu, Superconductivity at 39 K in magnesium diboride, Nature410, 63 (2001)

    work page 2001

  32. [32]

    Ferdeghini, V

    C. Ferdeghini, V . Ferrando, G. Grassano, W. Ramadan, E. Bellingeri, V . Braccini, D. Marr ´e, P. Manfrinetti, A. Palenzona, F. Borgatti, R. Felici, and T.-L. Lee, Growth of c-oriented MgB2 thin films by pulsed laser deposition: structural characterization and electronic anisotropy, Su- percond. Sci. Technol.14, 952 (2001)

    work page 2001

  33. [33]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y . Wang, D. Wang, Y . Zhang, Q.-R. Feng, and Z.-Z. Gan, Hybrid physical–chemical vapor deposition of ultrathin MgB2 films on MgO substrate with highT c and Jc, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.23, 7500204 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Charaev, E

    I. Charaev, E. K. Batson, S. Cherednichenko, K. Reidy, V . Drakinskiy, Y . Yu, S. Lara-Avila, J. D. Thomsen, M. Colangelo, F. Incalza, K. Ilin, A. Schilling, and K. K. Berggren, Single-photon detection using large-scale high- temperature MgB 2 sensors at 20 K, Nat. Commun.15, 3973 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Greenfield, C

    J. Greenfield, C. Bell, F. Faramarzi, C. Kim, R. Basu Thakur, A. Wandui, C. Frez, P. Mauskopf, and D. Cunnane, Kinetic inductance and non-linearity of MgB2 films at 4 K, Appl. Phys. Lett.126, 022602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Pfaff, S

    C. Pfaff, S. Petit-Watelot, S. Andrieu, L. Pasquier, J. Ghanbaja, S. Mangin, K. Dumesnil, and T. Hauet, Spin injection at MgB2-superconductor/ferromagnet interface, Appl. Phys. Lett.125, 102601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Ueda and M

    K. Ueda and M. Naito, In situ growth of superconduct- ing MgB2 thin films by molecular-beam epitaxy, J. Appl. Phys.93, 2113 (2003)

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    X. X. Xi, MgB 2 thin films, Supercond. Sci. Technol.22, 043001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    L. Li, H. Zhang, Y . Yang, and G. Miao, High-quality epitaxial MgB2 Josephson junctions grown by molecular beam epitaxy, Adv. Eng. Mater.19, 1600792 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    J. D. Jorgensen, D. G. Hinks, and S. Short, Lattice proper- ties of MgB2 versus temperature and pressure, Phys. Rev. B63, 224522 (2001)

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    W. Tian, X. Q. Pan, S. D. Bu, D. M. Kim, J. H. Choi, S. Patnaik, and C. B. Eom, Interfacial structure of epi- taxial MgB2 thin films grown on (0001) sapphire, Appl. Phys. Lett.81, 685 (2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    Jo, J.-U

    W. Jo, J.-U. Huh, T. Ohnishi, A. F. Marshall, M. R. Beasley, and R. H. Hammond, In situ growth of super- conducting MgB2 thin films with preferential orientation by molecular-beam epitaxy, Appl. Phys. Lett.80, 3563 (2002)

    work page 2002

  43. [43]

    Saito, H

    A. Saito, H. Shimakage, A. Kawakami, Z. Wang, K. Kuroda, H. Abe, M. Naito, W. Moon, K. Kaneko, M. Mukaida, and S. Ohshima, XRD and TEM studies of as-grown MgB2 thin films deposited on r- and c-plane sapphire substrates, Physica C412–414, 1366 (2004)

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    L. Gu, B. H. Moeckly, and D. J. Smith, Electron mi- croscopy studies of epitaxial MgB 2 superconducting thin films grown by in situ reactive evaporation, J. Cryst. Growth280, 602 (2005)

    work page 2005

  45. [45]

    Szab ´o, P

    P. Szab ´o, P. Samuely, A. G. M. Jansen, T. Klein, J. Mar- cus, D. Fruchart, and S. Miraglia, Magnetotransport and the upper critical magnetic field in MgB2, Physica C369, 250 (2002)

    work page 2002

  46. [46]

    Dahm and N

    T. Dahm and N. Schopohl, Fermi surface topology and the upper critical field in two-band superconductors: Ap- plication to mgb2, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 017001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  47. [47]

    Tsukui, M

    S. Tsukui, M. Adachi, R. Oshima, H. Nakajima, F. Tou- jou, K. Tsukamoto, and T. Tabata, Oxygen tracer diffu- sion in the YBa 2Cu3Oy superconductor, Physica C351, 357 (2001)

    work page 2001

  48. [48]

    O. V . Dobrovolskiy, E. Begun, M. Huth, and V . A. Shklovskij, Electrical transport and pinning properties of Nb thin films patterned with focused ion beam-milled washboard nanostructures, New J. Phys.14, 113027 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    E. H. Brandt, The flux-line lattice in superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys.58, 1465 (1995)

    work page 1995

  50. [50]

    W.-K. Kwok, U. Welp, A. Glatz, A. E. Koshelev, K. J. Kihlstrom, and G. W. Crabtree, V ortices in high- performance high-temperature superconductors, Rep. Progr. Phys.79, 116501 (2016). 11

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    A. V . Silhanek, M. V . Miloˇsevi´c, R. B. G. Kramer, G. R. Berdiyorov, J. Van de V ondel, R. F. Luccas, T. Puig, F. M. Peeters, and V . V . Moshchalkov, Formation of stripelike flux patterns obtained by freezing kinematic vortices in a superconducting Pb film, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 017001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    D. Y . V odolazov, Flux-flow instability in a strongly dis- ordered superconducting strip with an edge barrier for vortex entry, Superconductor Science and Technology32, 115013 (2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    Bezuglyj, V

    A. Bezuglyj, V . Shklovskij, B. Budinsk ´a, B. Aichner, V . Bevz, M. Mikhailov, D. V odolazov, W. Lang, and O. Dobrovolskiy, V ortex jets generated by edge defects in current-carrying superconductor thin strips, Phys. Rev. B105, 214507 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Kramer and R

    L. Kramer and R. J. Watts-Tobin, Theory of dissipa- tive current-carrying states in superconducting filaments, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 1041 (1978)

    work page 1978

  55. [55]

    Bishop-Van Horn, pyTDGL: Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau in Python, Comput

    L. Bishop-Van Horn, pyTDGL: Time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau in Python, Comput. Phys. Commun. 291, 108799 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    I. S. Aranson and L. Kramer, The world of the com- plex Ginzburg-Landau equation, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 99 (2002)

    work page 2002

  57. [57]

    O. V . Dolgov and A. A. Golubov, Strong electron-phonon interaction in multiband superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 77, 214526 (2008)

    work page 2008

  58. [58]

    K. V . Grigorishin, Effective Ginzburg-Landau free en- ergy functional for multi-band isotropic superconductors, Phys. Lett. A380, 1781 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    A. E. Koshelev, I. A. Sadovskyy, C. L. Phillips, and A. Glatz, Optimization of vortex pinning by nanoparti- cles using simulations of the time-dependent Ginzburg- Landau model, Phys. Rev. B93, 060508 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    Kasaei, T

    L. Kasaei, T. Melbourne, V . Manichev, L. C. Feldman, T. Gustafsson, K. Chen, X. X. Xi, and B. A. Davidson, MgB2 Josephson junctions produced by focused helium ion beam irradiation, AIP Adv.8, 075020 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    P. L. Kapitza, J. Phys.4, 181 (1941)

    work page 1941

  62. [62]

    G. L. Pollack, Kapitza resistance, Rev. Mod. Phys.41, 48 (1969)

    work page 1969

  63. [63]

    Crys- tal structure effects on vortex dynamics in supercon- ducting MgB2 thin films

    C. Schmid, Research data for the research article “Crys- tal structure effects on vortex dynamics in supercon- ducting MgB2 thin films” (2026), Mendeley Data, DOI: 10.17632/42k2ym76s7.1

    work page doi:10.17632/42k2ym76s7.1 2026