pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15187 · v3 · pith:HFBKD7Y6new · submitted 2026-04-16 · ✦ hep-th

Extraordinary Surface Criticalities for Interacting Fermions

Oleksandr Diatlyk , Zimo Sun , Yifan Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 23:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords surface defectsinteracting fermionsGross-Neveu-Yukawa modelrenormalization group flowsfermionic anomaliestopological structuresdefect couplingsCFT distance conjecture
0
0 comments X

The pith

In the three-dimensional Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model, defect renormalization group flows admit exact infrared solutions that encode fermionic anomalies in surface dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies surface critical behavior in interacting fermion systems modeled by the three-dimensional Gross-Neveu-Yukawa theory. It derives exact solutions for a class of defect renormalization group flows in the infrared regime. These solutions demonstrate how anomalies associated with the fermions are reflected in the dynamics at the surface. The analysis also reveals unexpected topological and geometric patterns within the space of defect couplings, with ties to a conjectured defect version of the CFT distance conjecture. Such results matter for classifying critical phenomena involving defects in quantum field theories of fermions.

Core claim

For a class of defect renormalization group flows in the three-dimensional Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model, exact infrared solutions are obtained. Fermionic anomalies are encoded in the resulting surface dynamics. Emergent topological and geometric structures appear in the defect coupling space, related to a defect analogue of the CFT distance conjecture.

What carries the argument

Exact infrared solutions for defect renormalization group flows in the Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model, which encode fermionic anomalies in surface dynamics and expose topological and geometric structures in the coupling space.

If this is right

  • Exact infrared solutions describe the surface critical behavior for interacting fermions precisely.
  • Fermionic anomalies manifest directly in the surface dynamics.
  • Topological structures emerge to classify different defect couplings.
  • Geometric structures in coupling space connect to a defect analogue of the CFT distance conjecture.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exact solutions might extend to other models of interacting fermions in three dimensions.
  • The emergent structures could link to surface phenomena in condensed matter systems with defects.
  • Lattice simulations of the Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model could provide numerical checks for the infrared predictions.
  • This framework may help classify surface defects in related quantum field theories.

Load-bearing premise

The three-dimensional Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model with the chosen defect couplings permits exact infrared solutions for the renormalization group flows without requiring additional approximations.

What would settle it

A renormalization group calculation or lattice simulation showing that the chosen defect couplings do not reach an infrared fixed point with the predicted surface dynamics would contradict the exact solutions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15187 by Oleksandr Diatlyk, Yifan Wang, Zimo Sun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The extraordinary surface defect viewed as a squeezed limit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Emergent conformal manifold of extraordinary surface de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Fusion of normal surface defects in the GNY CFT into the extraordinary surface defect, shown in the bottom diagrams. This fusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Interacting fermions exhibit a rich landscape of surface defects and associated critical phenomena. We investigate novel surface critical behavior in the three-dimensional Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model. For a class of defect renormalization group flows, we obtain exact infrared solutions and show how fermionic anomalies are encoded in the resulting surface dynamics. We further uncover emergent topological and geometric structures in the defect coupling space, and comment on their relation to a defect analogue of the CFT distance conjecture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates novel surface critical behavior in the three-dimensional Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model. For a class of defect renormalization group flows, exact infrared solutions are obtained, showing how fermionic anomalies are encoded in the surface dynamics. Emergent topological and geometric structures in the defect coupling space are uncovered, with comments on their relation to a defect analogue of the CFT distance conjecture.

Significance. Exact infrared solutions for renormalization group flows in an interacting fermionic model would constitute a notable result, as such solvability is uncommon in strongly coupled regimes. The encoding of anomalies in surface dynamics and the identification of topological/geometric structures in coupling space could provide useful benchmarks for defect CFT studies and related conjectures, if the derivations are free of hidden approximations.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that exact IR solutions are obtained for 'a class of defect renormalization group flows' but does not specify the precise subclass or the criteria used to identify it; adding this detail in §2 or §3 would improve clarity.
  2. [Discussion] The relation to the 'defect analogue of the CFT distance conjecture' is mentioned but not quantified; a brief comparison of the derived geometric structures to existing distance measures in the literature would strengthen the discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive report, including the recognition of the significance of exact infrared solutions in the Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model and the encoding of fermionic anomalies in surface dynamics. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and will make any necessary clarifications or improvements to the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation chain begins from the standard 3D Gross-Neveu-Yukawa Lagrangian with chosen defect couplings and proceeds to exact IR solutions for a class of RG flows. No quoted equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing premise rests solely on self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work of the same authors. The emergent topological structures and anomaly encoding are presented as consequences of the solved dynamics rather than redefinitions of the input data. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract; paper appears to rely on standard QFT and RG methods without explicit new free parameters or invented entities stated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of quantum field theory, renormalization group flows, and anomaly matching apply to the Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model with defects.
    Invoked to obtain exact infrared solutions and encode anomalies in surface dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1098 out tokens · 40873 ms · 2026-05-20T23:59:28.647514+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Twist on Scattering from Defect Anomalies

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defect 't Hooft anomalies trap charges at symmetry-line junctions and thereby drive categorical scattering into twist operators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 124 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    −γ1/¯x12 2µ±tanh( r 2) cosh( r 2) , (III.11) 5 wherer≡arccosh(v)andG ± satisfy the boundary condition γ1G±(x1, x2) z1→0 =∓G ±(x1, x2)|z1→0 .(III.12) The fermion propagatorsG 11 andG 12 can be expressed as linear combinations ofG ±, with coefficients fixed by the bulk conformal block expansion. According to [26], for a bulk op- erator of dimension∆, there ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    So theb-anomaly of the factorized defect|B 1⟩⟨B1|isb |B1⟩⟨B1| =− N 4

    = N 12 log(R)from (III.17). So theb-anomaly of the factorized defect|B 1⟩⟨B1|isb |B1⟩⟨B1| =− N 4 . On the other hand, theb-anomaly of a single 2dchiral Majo- rana fermion is cL+cR 2 = 1

    work page

  3. [3]

    In Appendix D 3, we find that the orderN 0 contribution in b|B1⟩⟨B1| is equal to− 9

    Therefore, the combined sys- tem|B 1⟩⟨B1|+χ I has a vanishingb-anomaly at orderN, which is the same as other points on the conformal manifold. In Appendix D 3, we find that the orderN 0 contribution in b|B1⟩⟨B1| is equal to− 9

    work page

  4. [4]

    Letψ I L andψ I R be the dimension 3 2 boundary fermions in the two decouple|B 1⟩boundaries

    So the proposal (I.3) obeys the de- fectb-theoremb UV > bIR at theN 0 order sinceb UV = 0. Letψ I L andψ I R be the dimension 3 2 boundary fermions in the two decouple|B 1⟩boundaries. We identify the marginal operator that decouples fromϕ e atµ= 1 2 as Oe = 1√ 2N (ψI L +ψ I R)χI .(IV .1) Similarly, the marginal operator that decouples fromϕ o at µ= 1 2 is...

    work page

  5. [5]

    A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, J. Phys. A10, 1927 (1977)

    work page 1927

  6. [6]

    D. M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Nucl. Phys. B455, 522 (1995), arXiv:cond-mat/9505127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  7. [7]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1996)

    J. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics, Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    H. W. Diehl, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B11, 3503 (1997), arXiv:cond- mat/9610143

    work page arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    M. A. Metlitski, SciPost Phys.12, 131 (2022), arXiv:2009.05119 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Giombi and H

    S. Giombi and H. Khanchandani, JHEP11, 118 (2020), arXiv:2007.04955 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Padayasi, A

    J. Padayasi, A. Krishnan, M. A. Metlitski, I. A. Gruzberg, and M. Meineri, SciPost Phys.12, 190 (2022), arXiv:2111.03071 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    F. P. Toldin and M. A. Metlitski, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 215701 (2022), arXiv:2111.03613 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Krishnan and M

    A. Krishnan and M. A. Metlitski, SciPost Phys.15, 090 (2023), arXiv:2301.05728 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Tr´ epanier,Surface defects in the O(N) model,JHEP09(2023) 074, [arXiv:2305.10486]

    M. Tr ´epanier, JHEP09, 074 (2023), arXiv:2305.10486 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Giombi and B

    S. Giombi and B. Liu, JHEP12, 004 (2023), arXiv:2305.11402 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Phases of surface defects in S calar Field Theories,

    A. Raviv-Moshe and S. Zhong, JHEP08, 143 (2023), arXiv:2305.11370 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Diatlyk, Z

    O. Diatlyk, Z. Sun, and Y . Wang, (2024), arXiv:2411.16522 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    F. K. Popov and Y . Wang, (2025), arXiv:2504.06203 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms

    A. Kapustin, R. Thorngren, A. Turzillo, and Z. Wang, JHEP 12, 052 (2015), arXiv:1406.7329 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases

    E. Witten, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035001 (2016), arXiv:1508.04715 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Gapped Boundary Phases of Topological Insulators via Weak Coupling

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, PTEP2016, 12C101 (2016), arXiv:1602.04251 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, Geom. Topol.25, 1165 (2021), arXiv:1604.06527 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    The "Parity" Anomaly On An Unorientable Manifold

    E. Witten, Phys. Rev. B94, 195150 (2016), arXiv:1605.02391 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D13, 3398 (1976)

    work page 1976

  25. [25]

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. A. Harvey, Nucl. Phys. B250, 427 (1985)

    work page 1985

  26. [26]

    A Duality Web in 2+1 Dimensions and Condensed Matter Physics

    N. Seiberg, T. Senthil, C. Wang, and E. Witten, Annals Phys. 374, 395 (2016), arXiv:1606.01989 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    M. A. Metlitski, A. Vishwanath, and C. Xu, Phys. Rev. B95, 205137 (2017), arXiv:1611.05049 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Komargodski, F

    Z. Komargodski, F. K. Popov, and B. C. Rayhaun, (2025), arXiv:2508.14963 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Fermions in AdS and Gross-Neveu BCFT,

    S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger, and H. Khanchandani, JHEP07, 018 (2022), arXiv:2110.04268 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    C. P. Herzog and V . Schaub, JHEP02, 129 (2023), arXiv:2209.05511 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Giombi, E

    S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger, and H. Khanchandani, JHEP08, 224 (2023), arXiv:2211.11073 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Jiang, Y

    H. Jiang, Y . Ge, and S.-K. Jian, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 141602 (2025), arXiv:2503.13247 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    A. A. Fedorenko and I. A. Gruzberg, (2026), arXiv:2603.07637 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Bootstrapping 3D Fermions

    L. Iliesiu, F. Kos, D. Poland, S. S. Pufu, D. Simmons-Duffin, and R. Yacoby, JHEP03, 120 (2016), arXiv:1508.00012 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    R. S. Erramilli, L. V . Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, JHEP02, 036 (2023), arXiv:2210.02492 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    M. S. Mitchell and D. Poland, JHEP09, 134 (2024), arXiv:2406.12974 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    L. Fei, S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov, and G. Tarnopolsky, PTEP 2016, 12C105 (2016), arXiv:1607.05316 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    N. Zerf, L. N. Mihaila, P. Marquard, I. F. Herbut, and M. M. Scherer, Phys. Rev. D96, 096010 (2017), arXiv:1709.05057 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    J. A. Gracey, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and Y . Schr ¨oder, Phys. Rev. D112, 085029 (2025), arXiv:2507.22594

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    J. A. Gracey, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6, 395 (1991), [Erratum: Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 6, 2755 (1991)]

    work page 1991

  41. [41]

    J. A. Gracey, Phys. Lett. B297, 293 (1992)

    work page 1992

  42. [42]

    A. N. Vasil’ev, S. E. Derkachov, N. A. Kivel, and A. S. Stepanenko, Theor. Math. Phys.94, 127 (1993), arXiv:hep- th/9302034

    work page arXiv 1993

  43. [43]

    J. A. Gracey, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9, 727 (1994), arXiv:hep- th/9306107

    work page arXiv 1994

  44. [44]

    Diatlyk, Z

    O. Diatlyk, Z. Sun, and Y . Wang, (2026), to appear

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    The ordinary surface defect of the GNY model,

    O. Diatlyk, Z. Sun, and Y . Wang, “The ordinary surface defect of the GNY model,” (2026), to appear

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    For example, a non-genuine ’t Hooft loop in4dSU(N)gauge theory can be viewed as a mon- odromy defect for theZ N electric one-form symmetry

    Usual monodromy defects are defined for0-form symmetries, but their extension top-form symmetries is straightforward: they correspond to localized flux insertions for the associated background gauge fields. For example, a non-genuine ’t Hooft loop in4dSU(N)gauge theory can be viewed as a mon- odromy defect for theZ N electric one-form symmetry. The novelt...

    work page

  47. [47]

    A Constraint on Defect and Boundary Renormalization Group Flows

    K. Jensen and A. O’Bannon, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 091601 (2016), arXiv:1509.02160 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Irreversibility in quantum field theories with boundaries

    H. Casini, I. Salazar Landea, and G. Torroba, JHEP04, 166 (2019), arXiv:1812.08183 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Wang, Surface defect, anomalies and b-extremization, JHEP 11, 122 , arXiv:2012.06574 [hep-th]

    Y . Wang, JHEP11, 122 (2021), arXiv:2012.06574 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Shachar, R

    T. Shachar, R. Sinha, and M. Smolkin, SciPost Phys.15, 240 (2023), arXiv:2212.08081 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B766, 21 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0605264

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    Ooguri and Y

    H. Ooguri and Y . Wang, JHEP12, 154 (2024), arXiv:2405.00674 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Emergent Space-time Supersymmetry at the Boundary of a Topological Phase

    T. Grover, D. N. Sheng, and A. Vishwanath, Science344, 280 (2014), arXiv:1301.7449 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Bootstrapping minimal $\mathcal{N}=1$ superconformal field theory in three dimensions

    J. Rong and N. Su, JHEP06, 154 (2021), arXiv:1807.04434 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Bootstrapping the Minimal 3D SCFT

    A. Atanasov, A. Hillman, and D. Poland, JHEP11, 140 (2018), arXiv:1807.05702 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Atanasov, A

    A. Atanasov, A. Hillman, D. Poland, J. Rong, and N. Su, JHEP08, 136 (2022), arXiv:2201.02206 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Gukov, V

    S. Gukov, V . Krushkal, L. Meier, and D. Pei, (2025), arXiv:2509.12402 [math.AT]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Cuomo and S

    G. Cuomo and S. Zhang, JHEP03, 022 (2024), arXiv:2306.00085 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    The extraordinary-log scenario in theO(N)Wilson-Fisher theory [9, 54] does not appear to happen here as in confirmed 9 by our direct largeNanalysis in Section III

    work page

  60. [60]

    In fact, the phase diagram ofO(N)-invariant boundaries in the GNY model as presented in [25] is incomplete ind= 3. In particular, there is in addition, another extraordinary bound- ary universality class with decoupled fermions, much like the extraordinary surface defect considered here; furthermore, the special and ordinary boundaries disappear at a crit...

    work page

  61. [61]

    Boundary criticality in the GNY model at higher orders,

    O. Diatlyk, S. Giombi, and Z. Sun, “Boundary criticality in the GNY model at higher orders,” (2026), to appear

    work page 2026

  62. [62]

    Anomalous symmetries end at the b oundary,

    R. Thorngren and Y . Wang, JHEP09, 017 (2021), arXiv:2012.15861 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    A. N. Redlich, Phys. Rev. D29, 2366 (1984)

    work page 1984

  64. [64]

    A. J. Niemi and G. W. Semenoff, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2077 (1983)

    work page 2077

  65. [65]

    Alvarez-Gaume, S

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, S. Della Pietra, and G. W. Moore, Annals Phys.163, 288 (1985)

    work page 1985

  66. [66]

    Córdova, D

    C. C ´ordova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, SciPost Phys.8, 001 (2020), arXiv:1905.09315 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Hason, Z

    I. Hason, Z. Komargodski, and R. Thorngren, SciPost Phys. 8, 062 (2020), arXiv:1910.14039 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Any3dspin QFT is defined up to a quantized Chern-Simons counter-termkCS g withk∈Zwhich modifies the contact terms in the stress-tensor two-point functions and shifts the boundary gravitational anomaly [45, 87–89] but this effect is canceled between one boundary|B⟩and its transverse reflec- tion⟨B|

    work page

  69. [69]

    This fixes the Chern-Simons counterterm in the previous footnote

    Here the constant shift inρis fixed by requiringρ(0) = 1/2 so that the anomaly theory (II.7) isT-invariant [90]. This fixes the Chern-Simons counterterm in the previous footnote

    work page

  70. [70]

    Zinn-Justin, Nucl

    J. Zinn-Justin, Nucl. Phys. B367, 105 (1991)

    work page 1991

  71. [71]

    See Appendix B for relevant three-point functions

    In contrast, the deformationhϕ 2δ(z)is marginal but not ex- actly marginal in the largeNlimit [41]. See Appendix B for relevant three-point functions

    work page

  72. [72]

    The 1 N anomalous dimensions is positive for the fermions and negative for the pseudoscalar

    The fermion and pseudoscalar fields all have dimension∆ = 1in the largeNlimit. The 1 N anomalous dimensions is positive for the fermions and negative for the pseudoscalar. [36, 39]

    work page

  73. [73]

    Spinor Parallel Propagator and Green's Function in Maximally Symmetric Spaces

    W. Mueck, J. Phys. A33, 3021 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9912059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  74. [74]

    Gravitino Propagator in anti de Sitter space

    A. Basu and L. I. Uruchurtu, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 6059 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  75. [75]

    A new logarithmic solution emerges at this point and is given by∂ µ(G+ −G −)|µ=1/2

    The two solutionsG ± in (III.11) are degenerate atµ= 1/2 where the fermionic Breitenlohner-Freedman (BF) bound in AdS3 is saturated. A new logarithmic solution emerges at this point and is given by∂ µ(G+ −G −)|µ=1/2. While its lead- ing fall-off at largercorresponds to a ˆ∆ = 1/2boundary fermion, this solution is not normalizable [91]. This is another ind...

    work page

  76. [76]

    In our normalization, this free fermion propagator is − /x12 4π|x12|3

    work page

  77. [77]

    Homological mirror symmetry and torus fibrations

    M. Kontsevich and Y . Soibelman, inKIAS Annual Interna- tional Conference on Symplectic Geometry and Mirror Sym- metry(2000) pp. 203–263, arXiv:math/0011041

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  78. [78]

    Limits and Degenerations of Unitary Conformal Field Theories

    D. Roggenkamp and K. Wendland, Commun. Math. Phys. 251, 589 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0308143

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  79. [79]

    Soibelman, (2025), arXiv:2506.00896 [hep-th]

    Y . Soibelman, (2025), arXiv:2506.00896 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Alternatively, one can derive the relation betweenµandsby computing the anomalous dimension ofψ I L/R under this per- turbation and matching it with the boundary dimension ofΨ I e. This requires the boundary fermion four-point function at or- der1/Nfor the normal boundary condition, analogous to the boundary four-point functions studied in the largeNexpan...

    work page

Showing first 80 references.