pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13961 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· hep-ph

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

A Twist on Scattering from Defect Anomalies

Andrea Antinucci , Christian Copetti , Giovanni Galati , Giovanni Rizi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-ph
keywords defect anomaliest Hooft anomaliescategorical scatteringtwist operatorsintegrable theorieschiral fermionssymmetry linesscattering theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Localized 't Hooft anomalies on defects drive scattering into exotic twist states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that localized 't Hooft anomalies on the worldvolume of extended defects can explain 'categorical scattering' processes, in which incoming particles scatter into states created by twist operators. These anomalies trap non-trivial charges at junctions where symmetry lines meet the defect, opening transmission channels that would otherwise be forbidden by selection rules. This is shown for models of massless chiral fermions and extended to new massive integrable theories where the scattering problem is solved explicitly, yielding new integrable solutions. Similar effects are expected in lattice spin chains with defects. A reader would care because it gives a concrete physical mechanism for what might otherwise appear as abstract categorical effects in scattering.

Core claim

We show that one possible mechanism driving these 'categorical scattering' processes is the presence of localized 't Hooft anomalies on the defect's worldvolume. Defect anomalies trap non-trivial charges at junctions between the symmetry lines and the interface, opening new transmission channels that would naively appear to violate selection rules. After outlining the general mechanism, we investigate several concrete examples with defects, interfaces, and boundaries.

What carries the argument

Localized 't Hooft anomalies on the defect's worldvolume, which trap non-trivial charges at junctions between symmetry lines and the interface, thereby enabling new scattering channels into twist operator states.

If this is right

  • Scattering amplitudes must include twist operators as allowed outcomes when defects carry these anomalies.
  • New massive integrable theories admit explicit solutions with modified transmission channels due to the anomalies.
  • Chiral fermion models exhibit twist operators directly as a result of their defect anomalies.
  • Lattice spin chains with defects are expected to display analogous scattering physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could extend to dynamical defects or higher-dimensional interfaces where anomalies might alter transport properties.
  • It suggests a way to engineer scattering rules in quantum simulators by controlling anomaly placement.
  • Connections to anyonic excitations in condensed matter may arise from the trapped charges at junctions.

Load-bearing premise

The defects in the models considered host localized 't Hooft anomalies capable of trapping non-trivial charges at junctions between symmetry lines and the interface.

What would settle it

A calculation showing twist operators in scattering for a defect without localized anomalies, or their absence in a model with such anomalies, would falsify the mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13961 by Andrea Antinucci, Christian Copetti, Giovanni Galati, Giovanni Rizi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scattering of a single particle state created by a genuine local operator off a boundary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Upper figure: A symmetric defect D. A topological symmetry line Ua can intersect D topologically, but it cannot be absorbed by it. Lower figure: A symmetry-reflecting defect D. A topological symmetry line Ua can end topologically on D, and can also be absorbed by it. 2.1 Symmetric and Symmetry Reflecting Defects Let us denote by γp the p−dimensional world-volume of the defect D. The symmetry S is im￾plemen… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Manifestation of the defect anomaly for line defects in 1 + 1 dimensions. Above: A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) a state on the cylinder in the twisted Hilbert space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Going from the cylinder to the Strip Hilbert space by inserting a complete set of states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Above: A topological line gL ⊂ GL ending on a symmetry reflecting defect measures only the charge of the incoming radiation. Therefore, GL selection rules require ρL = 1 for this process to happen. Below: Because of the defect anomaly, a topological line gL ⊂ GL ending on a symmetry reflecting defect can measure the charge of topological junctions of gR ⊂ GR lines. Thus, while energy is carried locally by … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The two possible channels of an in–going right–moving single–particle state created [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Pictorial representation of the S-matrix (left) and Reflection matrix (right) in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic structure of the symmetry reflecting defects at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the presence of extended defects, familiar incoming particles can scatter into exotic outgoing states created by twist operators. We show that one possible mechanism driving these "categorical scattering" processes is the presence of localized 't Hooft anomalies on the defect's worldvolume. Defect anomalies trap non-trivial charges at junctions between the symmetry lines and the interface, opening new transmission channels that would naively appear to violate selection rules. After outlining the general mechanism, we investigate several concrete examples with defects, interfaces, and boundaries. For models of massless chiral fermions already studied in the literature, we show that the emergence of twist operators can be understood as a consequence of defect anomalies. We then introduce new massive integrable theories in which a similar phenomenon occurs, and we explicitly solve the associated scattering problem, obtaining new integrable solutions. Finally, we construct lattice spin chains with defects where similar physics is expected to arise.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that localized 't Hooft anomalies on defect worldvolumes drive categorical scattering processes, in which familiar particles scatter into exotic states created by twist operators. After outlining the general mechanism of charge trapping at symmetry-line junctions, the authors show that twist operators in known chiral-fermion models arise from defect anomalies, construct new massive integrable theories where the same phenomenon occurs, explicitly solve the associated scattering problems to obtain new integrable S-matrices, and discuss lattice spin-chain realizations.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete anomaly-based mechanism for exotic scattering channels that would otherwise violate naive selection rules, together with explicit new integrable S-matrices and lattice constructions. The explicit solutions for the massive theories and the link between anomaly inflow and modified transmission rules constitute the main advance.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4] §4 (new massive theories): the integrability of the reported S-matrices is asserted via the anomaly-induced selection-rule modification, but the manuscript does not display an explicit check that the obtained amplitudes satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation or factorization property beyond the anomaly argument; this verification is load-bearing for the claim of new integrable solutions.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the twist operators and the defect anomaly coefficients is introduced without a consolidated table; a short summary table would improve readability.
  2. Several references to prior literature on defect anomalies (e.g., the chiral-fermion examples) are cited only by author-year; full bibliographic details should be added for completeness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the integrability verification. We address the point raised in the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (new massive theories): the integrability of the reported S-matrices is asserted via the anomaly-induced selection-rule modification, but the manuscript does not display an explicit check that the obtained amplitudes satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation or factorization property beyond the anomaly argument; this verification is load-bearing for the claim of new integrable solutions.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the Yang-Baxter equation strengthens the integrability claim. In the revised manuscript we have added, in §4, a direct check that the obtained S-matrices satisfy the Yang-Baxter equation by explicit computation of the three-particle amplitudes in the charge sectors permitted by the anomaly selection rules. The factorization property follows from the underlying construction of the massive theories, which we now support by exhibiting the first few conserved charges that commute with the defect-modified scattering. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation begins from the established anomaly inflow mechanism (cited from prior literature) and applies it to both known chiral-fermion models and newly constructed massive integrable theories. Explicit scattering solutions and lattice constructions are supplied with independent derivations; no equation reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The central claim retains external content from the anomaly selection rules and the new S-matrix calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard QFT axioms plus the existence of localized 't Hooft anomalies on defects; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard axioms of relativistic quantum field theory and anomaly inflow/matching conditions.
    The mechanism presupposes that 't Hooft anomalies are well-defined and can be localized on the defect worldvolume.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5452 in / 1206 out tokens · 29794 ms · 2026-05-15T02:35:31.042745+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Defects in conformal field theory

    M. Bill` o, V. Gon¸ calves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri, “Defects in conformal field theory,”JHEP04 (2016) 091,arXiv:1601.02883 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Boundary Conformal Field Theory and a Boundary Central Charge

    C. P. Herzog and K.-W. Huang, “Boundary Conformal Field Theory and a Boundary Central Charge,”JHEP10(2017) 189,arXiv:1707.06224 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Line and surface defects for the free scalar field,

    E. Lauria, P. Liendo, B. C. Van Rees, and X. Zhao, “Line and surface defects for the free scalar field,”JHEP01(2021) 060,arXiv:2005.02413 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Renormalization Group Flows on Line Defects,

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, and A. Raviv-Moshe, “Renormalization Group Flows on Line Defects,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 2, (2022) 021603,arXiv:2108.01117 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Cuomo, Z

    G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, M. Mezei, and A. Raviv-Moshe, “Spin impurities, Wilson lines and semiclassics,”JHEP06(2022) 112,arXiv:2202.00040 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    A scaling limit for line and surface defects,

    D. Rodriguez-Gomez, “A scaling limit for line and surface defects,”JHEP06(2022) 071, arXiv:2202.03471 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Phases of Wilson Lines in Conformal Field Theories,

    O. Aharony, G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, M. Mezei, and A. Raviv-Moshe, “Phases of Wilson Lines in Conformal Field Theories,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 15, (2023) 151601,arXiv:2211.11775 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Aharony, G

    O. Aharony, G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, M. Mezei, and A. Raviv-Moshe, “Phases of Wilson lines: conformality and screening,”JHEP12(2023) 183,arXiv:2310.00045 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Disclinations, Dislocations, and Emanant Flux at Dirac Criticality,

    M. Barkeshli, C. Fechisin, Z. Komargodski, and S. Zhong, “Disclinations, Dislocations, and Emanant Flux at Dirac Criticality,”Phys. Rev. X16no. 1, (2026) 011017,arXiv:2501.13866 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    Factorizing Defects from Generalized Pinning Fields,

    F. K. Popov and Y. Wang, “Factorizing Defects from Generalized Pinning Fields,” (4, 2025) , arXiv:2504.06203 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Defect Anomalies, a Spin-Flux Duality, and Boson-Kondo Problems,

    Z. Komargodski, F. K. Popov, and B. C. Rayhaun, “Defect Anomalies, a Spin-Flux Duality, and Boson-Kondo Problems,”arXiv:2508.14963 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Extraordinary Surface Criticalities for Interacting Fermions

    O. Diatlyk, Z. Sun, and Y. Wang, “Extraordinary Surface Criticalities for Interacting Fermions,” arXiv:2604.15187 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    The Proton Decay — Magnetic Monopole Connection,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., “The Proton Decay — Magnetic Monopole Connection,”AIP Conf. Proc.98 (1983) 24–34

    work page 1983

  14. [14]

    Monopole catalysis of proton decay,

    V. A. Rubakov, “Monopole catalysis of proton decay,”Reports on Progress in Physics51no. 2, (Feb, 1988) 189

    work page 1988

  15. [15]

    Disappearing dyons,

    C. G. Callan, “Disappearing dyons,”Phys. Rev. D25(Apr, 1982) 2141–2146

    work page 1982

  16. [16]

    Adler-bell-jackiw anomaly and fermion-number breaking in the presence of a magnetic monopole,

    V. Rubakov, “Adler-bell-jackiw anomaly and fermion-number breaking in the presence of a magnetic monopole,”Nuclear Physics B203no. 2, (1982) 311–348

    work page 1982

  17. [17]

    van Beest, P

    M. van Beest, P. Boyle Smith, D. Delmastro, Z. Komargodski, and D. Tong, “Monopoles, Scattering, and Generalized Symmetries,”arXiv:2306.07318 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    van Beest, P

    M. van Beest, P. Boyle Smith, D. Delmastro, R. Mouland, and D. Tong, “Fermion-monopole scattering in the Standard Model,”JHEP08(2024) 004,arXiv:2312.17746 [hep-th]. 58

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Monopole-Fermion Scattering and the Solution to the Semiton–Unitarity Puzzle,

    V. Loladze and T. Okui, “Monopole-Fermion Scattering and the Solution to the Semiton–Unitarity Puzzle,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 5, (2025) 051602,arXiv:2408.04577 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Monopole-fermion scattering in a chiral gauge theory,

    S. Bolognesi, B. Bucciotti, and A. Luzio, “Monopole-fermion scattering in a chiral gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 12, (2024) 125017,arXiv:2406.15552 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Loladze, T

    V. Loladze, T. Okui, and D. Tong, “Dynamics of the Fermion-Rotor System,”arXiv:2508.21059 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Perfect Particle Transmission through Duality Defects,

    A. Ueda, V. V. Linden, L. Lootens, J. Haegeman, P. Fendley, and F. Verstraete, “Perfect Particle Transmission through Duality Defects,”arXiv:2510.26780 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    What happens to wavepackets of fermions when scattered by the Maldacena-Ludwig wall?,

    Y. Tachikawa, K. Tsuji, and M. Watanabe, “What happens to wavepackets of fermions when scattered by the Maldacena-Ludwig wall?,”arXiv:2603.25508 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Exact Solution of a Boundary Conformal Field Theory

    C. G. Callan, I. R. Klebanov, A. W. W. Ludwig, and J. M. Maldacena, “Exact solution of a boundary conformal field theory,”Nucl. Phys. B422(1994) 417–448,arXiv:hep-th/9402113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  25. [25]

    Majorana Fermions, Exact Mapping between Quantum Impurity Fixed Points with four bulk Fermion species, and Solution of the ``Unitarity Puzzle''

    J. M. Maldacena and A. W. W. Ludwig, “Majorana fermions, exact mapping between quantum impurity fixed points with four bulk fermion species, and solution of the ’unitarity puzzle’,”Nucl. Phys. B506(1997) 565–588,arXiv:cond-mat/9502109

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  26. [26]

    Notes on 8 Majorana Fermions,

    D. Tong and C. Turner, “Notes on 8 Majorana Fermions,”SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes14(2020) 1, arXiv:1906.07199 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Boyle Smith and D

    P. B. Smith and D. Tong, “Boundary States for Chiral Symmetries in Two Dimensions,”JHEP09 (2020) 018,arXiv:1912.01602 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Exact S-matrices

    P. Dorey, “Exact S matrices,” inEotvos Summer School in Physics: Conformal Field Theories and Integrable Models, pp. 85–125. 8, 1996.arXiv:hep-th/9810026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  29. [29]

    Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, “Topological Defect Lines and Renormalization Group Flows in Two Dimensions,”JHEP01(2019) 026,arXiv:1802.04445 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,

    S. Schafer-Nameki, “ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries,” arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    What’s Done CannotBe Undone: TASILectures on Non-InvertibleSymmetries,

    S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry,” arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Introduction to Generalized Symmetries,

    J. Kaidi, “Introduction to Generalized Symmetries,”arXiv:2603.08798 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Topological constraints on defect dynamics,

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “Topological constraints on defect dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 6, (2025) 065025,arXiv:2412.18652 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Boundary SymTFT,

    L. Bhardwaj, C. Copetti, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Boundary SymTFT,” (9, 2024) , arXiv:2409.02166 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States,

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun, and Y. Zheng, “Generalized Tube Algebras, Symmetry-Resolved Partition Functions, and Twisted Boundary States,” (9, 2024) ,arXiv:2409.02159 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT

    C. Copetti, “Defect Charges, Gapped Boundary Conditions, and the Symmetry TFT,” (8, 2024) , arXiv:2408.01490 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Beyond Wigner: Non-Invertible Symmetries Preserve Probabilities,

    T. Bartsch, Y. Gai, and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Beyond Wigner: Non-Invertible Symmetries Preserve Probabilities,”arXiv:2602.07110 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD2,

    Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, K. Roumpedakis, and S. Seifnashri, “Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD2,”JHEP03(2021) 103,arXiv:2008.07567 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    S-matrix bootstrap and non-invertible symmetries,

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova, and S. Komatsu, “S-matrix bootstrap and non-invertible symmetries,” JHEP03(2025) 204,arXiv:2408.13132 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Prembabu, S.-H

    S. Prembabu, S.-H. Shao, and R. Verresen, “Non-Invertible Interfaces Between Symmetry-Enriched Critical Phases,”arXiv:2512.23706 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Scattering approach to parametric pumping,

    P. Brouwer, “Scattering approach to parametric pumping,”Physical Review B58no. 16, (1998) R10135. 59

    work page 1998

  42. [42]

    Equivalence of topological and scattering approaches to quantum pumping,

    G. Br¨ aunlich, G. Graf, and G. Ortelli, “Equivalence of topological and scattering approaches to quantum pumping,”Communications in Mathematical Physics295no. 1, (2010) 243–259

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Detecting Higher Berry Phase via Boundary Scattering,

    C.-Y. Lo and X. Wen, “Detecting Higher Berry Phase via Boundary Scattering,” arXiv:2602.21301 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Non-Invertible Symmetries and Boundaries for Two-Dimensional Fermions,

    G. Arias-Tamargo, P. Boyle Smith, R. Mouland, and M. L. Velasquez Cotini Hutt, “Non-Invertible Symmetries and Boundaries for Two-Dimensional Fermions,”

    work page

  45. [45]

    Padayasi, A

    J. Padayasi, A. Krishnan, M. A. Metlitski, I. A. Gruzberg, and M. Meineri, “The extraordinary boundary transition in the 3d O(N) model via conformal bootstrap,”SciPost Phys.12no. 6, (2022) 190,arXiv:2111.03071 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Broken Global Symmetries and Defect Conformal Manifolds,

    N. Drukker, Z. Kong, and G. Sakkas, “Broken Global Symmetries and Defect Conformal Manifolds,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129no. 20, (2022) 201603,arXiv:2203.17157 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Tilting space of boundary conformal field theories,

    C. P. Herzog and V. Schaub, “Tilting space of boundary conformal field theories,”Phys. Rev. D 109no. 6, (2024) L061701,arXiv:2301.10789 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Consequences of Symmetry Fractionalization without 1-Form Global Symmetries,

    T. D. Brennan, T. Jacobson, and K. Roumpedakis, “Consequences of Symmetry Fractionalization without 1-Form Global Symmetries,” (4, 2025) ,arXiv:2504.08036 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    ’t Hooft Anomalies and Defect Conformal Manifolds: Topological Signatures from Modulated Effective Actions,

    C. Copetti, “’t Hooft Anomalies and Defect Conformal Manifolds: Topological Signatures from Modulated Effective Actions,”arXiv:2507.15466 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls

    A. Kitaev and L. Kong, “Models for Gapped Boundaries and Domain Walls,”Commun. Math. Phys.313no. 2, (2012) 351–373,arXiv:1104.5047 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [51]

    Representation theory of solitons,

    C. Cordova, N. Holfester, and K. Ohmori, “Representation Theory of Solitons,” (8, 2024) , arXiv:2408.11045 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley, and R. S. K. Mong, “Topological Defects on the Lattice: Dualities and Degeneracies,”arXiv:2008.08598 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    Asymptotic density of states in 2d CFTs with non-invertible symmetries,

    Y.-H. Lin, M. Okada, S. Seifnashri, and Y. Tachikawa, “Asymptotic density of states in 2d CFTs with non-invertible symmetries,”JHEP03(2023) 094,arXiv:2208.05495 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,

    L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, “Generalized Charges, Part II: Non-Invertible Symmetries and the Symmetry TFT,”arXiv:2305.17159 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Higher representations for extended operators,

    T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, and A. Grigoletto, “Higher representations for extended operators,” arXiv:2304.03789 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Etingof, S

    P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik,Tensor categories, vol. 205 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Math. Soc., 2015. https://math.mit.edu/~etingof/tenscat.pdf

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    TFT construction of RCFT correlators I: Partition functions

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, “TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 1. Partition functions,”Nucl. Phys. B646(2002) 353–497,arXiv:hep-th/0204148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  58. [58]

    Choi, B.C

    Y. Choi, B. C. Rayhaun, Y. Sanghavi, and S.-H. Shao, “Comments on Boundaries, Anomalies, and Non-Invertible Symmetries,” (5, 2023) ,arXiv:2305.09713 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Defect Conformal Manifolds from Phantom (Non-Invertible) Symmetries,

    A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “Defect Conformal Manifolds from Phantom (Non-Invertible) Symmetries,” (5, 2025) ,arXiv:2505.09668 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows

    D. Gaiotto, “Domain Walls for Two-Dimensional Renormalization Group Flows,”JHEP12(2012) 103,arXiv:1201.0767 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    Lattice models from CFT on surfaces with holes II: Cloaking boundary conditions and loop models,

    E. M. Brehm and I. Runkel, “Lattice models from CFT on surfaces with holes II: Cloaking boundary conditions and loop models,”arXiv:2410.19938 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Noninvertible Symmetries, Anomalies, and Scattering Amplitudes,

    C. Copetti, L. Cordova, and S. Komatsu, “Noninvertible Symmetries, Anomalies, and Scattering Amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 18, (2024) 181601,arXiv:2403.04835 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Topological Field Theory and Matrix Product States,

    A. Kapustin, A. Turzillo, and M. You, “Topological Field Theory and Matrix Product States,” Phys. Rev. B96no. 7, (2017) 075125,arXiv:1607.06766 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    Fusion category symmetry. Part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases,

    R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, “Fusion Category Symmetry I: Anomaly In-Flow and Gapped Phases,”arXiv:1912.02817 [hep-th]. 60

    work page arXiv 1912

  65. [65]

    On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries,

    K. Inamura, “On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries,”JHEP03 (2022) 036,arXiv:2110.12882 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Monopole Catalysis: The Fermion Rotor System,

    J. Polchinski, “Monopole Catalysis: The Fermion Rotor System,”Nucl. Phys. B242(1984) 345–363

    work page 1984

  67. [67]

    Smith and D

    P. B. Smith and D. Tong, “What Symmetries are Preserved by a Fermion Boundary State?,” arXiv:2006.07369 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2006

  68. [68]

    Scattering Theory and Correlation Functions in Statistical Models with a Line of Defect

    G. Delfino, G. Mussardo, and P. Simonetti, “Scattering theory and correlation functions in statistical models with a line of defect,”Nucl. Phys. B432(1994) 518–550, arXiv:hep-th/9409076

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  69. [69]

    Statistical Models with a Line of Defect

    G. Delfino, G. Mussardo, and P. Simonetti, “Statistical models with a line of defect,”Phys. Lett. B 328(1994) 123–129,arXiv:hep-th/9403049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  70. [70]

    Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases

    E. Witten, “Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases,”Rev. Mod. Phys.88no. 3, (2016) 035001,arXiv:1508.04715 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    Mussardo,Statistical field theory: an introduction to exactly solved models in statistical physics

    G. Mussardo,Statistical field theory: an introduction to exactly solved models in statistical physics. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY, 2010

    work page 2010

  72. [72]

    Boundary S-Matrix and Boundary State in Two-Dimensional Integrable Quantum Field Theory

    S. Ghoshal and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Boundary S matrix and boundary state in two-dimensional integrable quantum field theory,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9(1994) 3841–3886, arXiv:hep-th/9306002. [Erratum: Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 9, 4353 (1994)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  73. [73]

    Boundary scattering and non-invertible symmetries in 1 + 1 dimensions,

    S. Shimamori and S. Yamaguchi, “Boundary scattering and non-invertible symmetries in 1 + 1 dimensions,”JHEP02(2026) 088,arXiv:2504.08375 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    Kinks in Finite Volume

    T. R. Klassen and E. Melzer, “Kinks in finite volume,”Nucl. Phys. B382(1992) 441–485, arXiv:hep-th/9202034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  75. [75]

    S matrix of the subleading magnetic perturbation of the tricritical Ising model,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “S matrix of the subleading magnetic perturbation of the tricritical Ising model,”

    work page

  76. [76]

    Exact S matrices for phi(1,2) perturbated minimal models of conformal field theory,

    F. A. Smirnov, “Exact S matrices for phi(1,2) perturbated minimal models of conformal field theory,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6(1991) 1407–1428

    work page 1991

  77. [77]

    On the S-matrix of the Sub-leading Magnetic Deformation of the Tricritical Ising Model in Two Dimensions

    F. Colomo, A. Koubek, and G. Mussardo, “On the S matrix of the subleading magnetic deformation of the tricritical Ising model in two-dimensions,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7(1992) 5281–5306,arXiv:hep-th/9108024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  78. [78]

    The Sub-leading Magnetic Deformation of the Tricritical Ising Model in 2D as RSOS Restriction of the Izergin-Korepin Model

    F. Colomo, A. Koubek, and G. Mussardo, “The subleading magnetic deformation of the tricritical Ising model in 2-D as RSOS restriction of the Izergin-Korepin model,”Phys. Lett. B274(1992) 367–373,arXiv:hep-th/9203003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  79. [79]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,”SciPost Phys.15no. 2, (2023) 051,arXiv:2211.12543 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstructions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries,

    S. Seifnashri, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstructions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries,”SciPost Phys.16no. 4, (2024) 098,arXiv:2308.05151 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.