pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16140 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🪐 quant-ph · math-ph· math.MP

Characterizing all non-Hermitian degeneracies using algebraic approaches: Defectiveness and asymptotic behavior

Sharareh Sayyad , Grigory A. Starkov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph math-phmath.MP
keywords non-Hermitian systemsexceptional pointsJordan blocksmulti-block degeneraciesasymptotic behaviordefectivenessperturbation theoryalgebraic characterization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Algebraic methods classify the asymptotic splitting of every non-Hermitian multi-block degeneracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Non-Hermitian systems support both ordinary n-fold degeneracies and exceptional points whose orders correspond to the sizes of Jordan blocks. These structures can coincide at one energy to form multi-block degeneracies. The paper supplies a complete algebraic description that determines how every such combination disperses under small perturbations. The resulting leading-order behavior depends only on the collection of block sizes present. Examples show that the same framework applies directly to systems studied in current experiments.

Core claim

Non-Hermitian degeneracies include n-bolical degeneracies analogous to Hermitian ones and exceptional points of orders set by Jordan-block sizes. When several of these meet at the same energy they form multi-block degeneracies. The paper shows that a rigorous algebraic formulation exists which determines the defectiveness of every such structure and fixes its asymptotic dispersion under perturbations, thereby unifying the treatment of all possible combinations without case-by-case adjustments.

What carries the argument

Algebraic classification of multi-block degeneracies by the sizes and types of their Jordan blocks, which fixes both defectiveness and the leading power-law splitting of eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

Load-bearing premise

The algebraic types capture the full leading dispersion of every multi-block degeneracy without missing higher-order corrections that would require extra case-specific rules.

What would settle it

A measured or computed splitting of eigenvalues near a known multi-block degeneracy whose scaling exponents or functional form deviates from the power laws fixed by the Jordan-block sizes of that degeneracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16140 by Grigory A. Starkov, Sharareh Sayyad.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Possible tropical polynomials in 𝐻2,1,1 with explicit forms given in Eq. (72) (a), Eq. (73) (b), Eq. (75) (c), and Eq. (74) (d). Red points indicate the roots of the tropical polynomials. with multiplicity 2. The third eigenvalue 𝜆 = 0 has the leading power 0. This means that there exist two degenracies with linear dispersion in 𝑡 and a flat third eigenvalue at 𝜆 = 0. When ˜𝑑21 ̸= 0, ˜𝑞2,1 = 0, the tropica… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Possible tropical polynomials in 𝐻2,1,1 with explicit forms given in Eq. (104) (a), Eq. (106) (b), Eq. (108) (c), and Eq. (110) (d). Red points indicate the roots of the tropical polynomials. + 𝑑23𝑑31𝑑44 − 𝑑23𝑑41 + 𝑑21𝑑43 − 𝑑24𝑑31𝑑43 − 𝑑24𝑑41𝑑44 + 𝑑21𝑑 2 44. (112) Parameterizing all variables 𝑑𝑖𝑗 by ˜𝑑𝑖𝑗 𝑡, with 𝑡 being a parameter along which the generic perturbation is performed, the characteristic polyn… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Possible tropical polynomials in 𝐻3,1 with explicit forms given in Eq. (121) (a), Eq. (122) (b), Eq. (123) (c), and Eq. (124) (d). Red points indicate the roots of the tropical polynomials. The nonzero tropical roots are then 𝜔0 = 1 and 𝜔0 = 1/3 with multiplicities of 1 and 3, respec￾tively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Possible tropical polynomials in 𝐻3,1 with ex￾plicit forms given in Eq. (128) (a), Eq. (129) (b), and Eq. (130) (c). Red points indicate the roots of the trop￾ical polynomials. Here, there is a single non-zero tropical root 1/4 with multiplicity 4, typical for EP4s. Note that the tropical polynomial does not care whether ˜𝑑43, ˜𝑑42 and ˜𝑑42 vanish as long as ˜𝑑41 is non-zero. As for 𝐻tot 4 , we generally o… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Eigenvalues of 𝑑2,2 given in Eq. (144) exhibit￾ing EP4s with 𝛾 1/4 asymptotic behavior close to 𝛾 = 0. with the characteristic polynomial being ℱ𝜆(𝛾) = 𝜆 4 − 𝛾𝜆2 + 𝛾𝜆 + 𝛾. (145) Tropicalizing this equation then reads 𝒫(𝛾, 𝜔0) = min{4𝜔, 2𝜔0 + 1, 𝜔0 + 1, 1}, (146) where the only tropical root is 𝜔0 = 1/4 with mul￾tiplicity 4 typical for EP4 splitting; see also the dis￾persion relation near 𝛾 = 0 in [PITH_FU… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The real and imaginary part of the NH Lieb’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Real (top panel) and imaginary (bottom) parts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The real and imaginary part of the NH Lieb’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The real and imaginary part of the NH Lieb’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Tropicalized characteristic polynomial 𝒫(Γ, 𝜔0) of the effective Liouvillian ℒeff . determined by its Liouvillian part: ℒeff = ℒ ′ eff = [︁ (−𝑖𝐻^ eff) ⊗ 1 + 1 ⊗ (𝑖𝐻^ * eff) ]︁ . (181) Using the results of Refs. [46, 101], we can construct explicitly the Jordan basis of ℒ ′ eff and determine its Jordan normal form as ℒ ′ eff ∼ 𝐽5(𝜆EP) ⊕ 𝐽3(𝜆EP) ⊕ 𝐽1(𝜆EP), (182) where 𝜆EP = −𝛾3. As soon as we add the dissip… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The presence of degeneracies plays a crucial role in describing the behavior of non-Hermitian (NH) systems. In these systems, there are two key types of degeneracies: $n$-bolical degeneracies, which are analogous to Hermitian degeneracies, and various forms of exceptional points, each associated with different orders that correspond to sizes of the Jordan blocks. These types of degeneracies may coalesce at the same energy level, forming multi-block degeneracies. To understand how a multi-block degenerate NH system responds to perturbations, one should address how each types of involved degeneracies disperse. In this work, we systematically characterize the asymptotic behavior of all types of multi-block degeneracies in NH systems using a rigorous mathematical formulation. Through a range of examples, we demonstrate that our algebraic approach can facilitate the analysis of NH degeneracies in various settings relevant to experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to systematically characterize the asymptotic behavior of all types of multi-block degeneracies in non-Hermitian systems via a rigorous algebraic formulation. This includes n-bolical degeneracies and exceptional points of varying orders (corresponding to Jordan block sizes), deriving leading-order perturbation expansions directly from the unperturbed Jordan structure and perturbation matrix elements, and illustrating the approach with examples relevant to experiments.

Significance. If the central algebraic derivations hold, the work provides a systematic, case-independent method for predicting dispersion of coalesced degeneracies under perturbation, which is useful for analyzing non-Hermitian phenomena in quantum mechanics, optics, and related fields. The strength lies in the direct algebraic approach from Jordan form without ad-hoc adjustments, together with the explicit coverage of all multi-block combinations and experimental examples.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the term 'n-bolical degeneracies' is introduced without a brief definition or citation to standard terminology (e.g., relation to Hermitian degeneracies); adding one sentence would improve accessibility.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement (perhaps in the introduction or a dedicated section) confirming that the algebraic expansions include all orders up to the leading non-analytic term for each block combination, to directly address potential concerns about missing higher-order effects.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report, so we have no individual points requiring point-by-point rebuttal. We will incorporate any minor editorial or technical suggestions during the revision process.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; direct algebraic derivation from Jordan structure

full rationale

The paper's central contribution is a systematic algebraic characterization of the asymptotic dispersion of all multi-block non-Hermitian degeneracies (n-bolical points coalesced with exceptional points of varying orders). This is obtained by direct perturbation expansions on the Jordan canonical form of the unperturbed operator together with the matrix elements of the perturbation, without any parameter fitting, self-referential predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The approach implicitly relies on standard linear algebra for Jordan forms.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians can be represented by matrices whose degeneracies are classified by Jordan block structures of various sizes.
    Central to distinguishing n-bolical degeneracies from exceptional points of different orders.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5453 in / 1146 out tokens · 26015 ms · 2026-05-10T08:12:02.638224+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Converting non-Hermitian degeneracies of any order: Hierarchies of exceptional points and degeneracy manifolds

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derogatory exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems can be converted to non-derogatory exceptional points of the same order by infinitesimal perturbations, forming hierarchies of degeneracy structures both with and...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The nontrivial per- turbation can be obtained by comparing Eq

    For this reason, the perturbation [𝛿𝑆, 𝐻 2] is known as a trivial perturbation. The nontrivial per- turbation can be obtained by comparing Eq. (32) and Eq.(41). To be more precise, after quotient- ing out infinitesimal similarity transformations from Eq. (32), we obtain the nontrivial traceless pertur- bation given by 𝛿𝐻2 = (︂ 0 0 𝑑21 0 )︂ , 𝐻 tot 2 =𝐻 2 ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The change of 8 slope (multiplicity) at this point is 3

    Here, the tropicalization of the characteristic polynomial reads 𝒫(𝑡, 𝜔0) = min{3𝜔0,2 +𝜔 0,3}.(61) There is a single tropical root𝜔 0 = 1. The change of 8 slope (multiplicity) at this point is 3. Therefore, the tropical polynomial predicts three eigenvalues with leading power 1, expected for non-defective degen- eracies. The tropical root remains unchange...

    work page

  3. [3]

    −𝛿 𝑛+𝑚−1 −𝜅𝑛−1 −𝑔1

    0 0. . .−𝛿 𝑛+𝑚−1 −𝜅𝑛−1 −𝑔1 . . .−𝑔 𝑚 −𝜅1 . . .−𝜅 𝑛−1 0 ⎞ ⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎠ , (131) where the size of𝑑 𝑚,𝑛 is𝑛+𝑚. Here,𝛿 𝑖 accounts for two-photon detuning and external perturbations on a particular magnon mode𝑖[87]. Two coupling constants𝑔 𝑖 and𝜅 𝑖 denote two different types of magnon-cavity interactions; see further details in Ref. [86]. The matrix𝑑 𝑚,𝑛 satisfi...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Non-hermitian physics,

    Yuto Ashida, Zongping Gong, and Masahito Ueda, “Non-hermitian physics,” Advances in Physics69, 249–435 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Exceptional non-hermitian topological edge mode and its application to active matter,

    Kazuki Sone, Yuto Ashida, and Takahiro Sagawa, “Exceptional non-hermitian topological edge mode and its application to active matter,” Nature com- munications11, 5745 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Topo- logical physics of non-hermitian optics and photon- ics: a review,

    Hongfei Wang, Xiujuan Zhang, Jinguo Hua, Dan- gyuan Lei, Minghui Lu, and Yanfeng Chen, “Topo- logical physics of non-hermitian optics and photon- ics: a review,” Journal of Optics23, 123001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Non- hermitian topology and exceptional-point geome- tries,

    Kun Ding, Chen Fang, and Guancong Ma, “Non- hermitian topology and exceptional-point geome- tries,” Nature Reviews Physics4, 745–760 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Topological complex-energy braid- ing of non-Hermitian bands,

    Kai Wang, Avik Dutt, Charles C. Wojcik, and Shanhui Fan, “Topological complex-energy braid- ing of non-Hermitian bands,” Nature598, 59–64 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Measuring the knot of non-Hermitian degenera- cies and non-commuting braids,

    Yogesh S.S. Patil, Judith H¨ oller, Parker A. Henry, Chitres Guria, Yiming Zhang, Luyao Jiang, Ne- nad Kralj, Nicholas Read, and Jack G.E. Harris, “Measuring the knot of non-Hermitian degenera- cies and non-commuting braids,” Nature607, 271– 275 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Three-band non-hermitian non-abelian topologi- cal insulator with𝒫𝒯symmetry,

    Yanmeng Liang, Rui Wang, Zhizhou Yu, Jun Chen, Liantuan Xiao, Suotang Jia, and Lei Zhang, “Three-band non-hermitian non-abelian topologi- cal insulator with𝒫𝒯symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B 109, 115127 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Resolving the topology of encircling multiple exceptional points,

    Chitres Guria, Qi Zhong, Sahin Kaya Ozdemir, Yogesh SS Patil, Ramy El-Ganainy, and Jack Gwynne Emmet Harris, “Resolving the topology of encircling multiple exceptional points,” Nature communications15, 1369 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Entanglement spectrum crossings reveal non-hermitian dynamical topol- ogy,

    Sharareh Sayyad, Jinlong Yu, Adolfo G. Grushin, and Lukas M. Sieberer, “Entanglement spectrum crossings reveal non-hermitian dynamical topol- ogy,” Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033022 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Protection of all nondefective twofold degeneracies by antiunitary symmetries in non-hermitian systems,

    Sharareh Sayyad, “Protection of all nondefective twofold degeneracies by antiunitary symmetries in non-hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043213 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [15]

    Topological phase diagrams of exactly solvable non-hermitian interacting kitaev chains,

    Sharareh Sayyad and Jose L. Lado, “Topological phase diagrams of exactly solvable non-hermitian interacting kitaev chains,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022046 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [16]

    Prob- ing phase transitions in non-hermitian systems with quantum entanglement,

    Ling-Feng Zhang and Wing Chi Yu, “Prob- ing phase transitions in non-hermitian systems with quantum entanglement,” Phys. Rev. B112, 144308 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [17]

    Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity,

    Weijian Chen, S ¸ahin Kaya ¨Ozdemir, Guangming Zhao, Jan Wiersig, and Lan Yang, “Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity,” Nature548, 192–196 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [18]

    Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order ex- ceptional points,

    Hossein Hodaei, Absar U. Hassan, Steffen Wit- tek, Hipolito Garcia-Gracia, Ramy El-Ganainy, Demetrios N. Christodoulides, and Mercedeh Kha- javikhan, “Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order ex- ceptional points,” Nature548, 187–191 (2017). 21

    work page 2017

  18. [19]

    Observation of the exceptional-point-enhanced sagnac effect,

    Yu-Hung Lai, Yu-Kun Lu, Myoung-Gyun Suh, Zhi- quan Yuan, and Kerry Vahala, “Observation of the exceptional-point-enhanced sagnac effect,” Nature 576, 65–69 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [20]

    Exceptional-point-based accelerometers with en- hanced signal-to-noise ratio,

    Rodion Kononchuk, Jizhe Cai, Fred Ellis, Ra- mathasan Thevamaran, and Tsampikos Kottos, “Exceptional-point-based accelerometers with en- hanced signal-to-noise ratio,” Nature607, 697–702 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [21]

    Enhanced sensitivity via non-hermitian topology,

    Midya Parto, Christian Leefmans, James Williams, Robert M Gray, and Alireza Marandi, “Enhanced sensitivity via non-hermitian topology,” Light: Sci- ence & Applications14, 6 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [22]

    Single plasmonic exceptional point nanoantenna coupled to a photonic inte- grated circuit sensor,

    Kamyar Behrouzi, Zhanni Wu, Liwei Lin, and Boubacar Kante, “Single plasmonic exceptional point nanoantenna coupled to a photonic inte- grated circuit sensor,” Photon. Res.13, 632–641 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [23]

    Exceptional-point-enhanced su- perior sensing using asymmetric coupled-lossy- resonator based optical metasurface,

    Basudev Nag Chowdhury, Pooja Lahiri, Nigel P. Johnson, Richard M. De La Rue, and Ba- sudev Lahiri, “Exceptional-point-enhanced su- perior sensing using asymmetric coupled-lossy- resonator based optical metasurface,” Laser & Photonics Reviews19, 2401661 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [24]

    Noise constraints for nonlinear exceptional point sensing,

    Xu Zheng and Y. D. Chong, “Noise constraints for nonlinear exceptional point sensing,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 133801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [25]

    Fundamental limits of non-hermitian sensing from quantum fisher infor- mation,

    Jan Wiersig and Stefan Rotter, “Fundamental lim- its of non-hermitian sensing from quantum fisher information,” (2026), arXiv:2603.10614

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [26]

    Speed- ing up entanglement generation by proximity to higher-order exceptional points,

    Zeng-Zhao Li, Weijian Chen, Maryam Abbasi, Kater W. Murch, and K. Birgitta Whaley, “Speed- ing up entanglement generation by proximity to higher-order exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [27]

    Non-hermitian perspective of the band structure in heavy-fermion systems,

    Tsuneya Yoshida, Robert Peters, and Norio Kawakami, “Non-hermitian perspective of the band structure in heavy-fermion systems,” Phys. Rev. B98, 035141 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [28]

    Equiv- alence of effective non-hermitian hamiltonians in the context of open quantum systems and strongly correlated electron systems,

    Yoshihiro Michishita and Robert Peters, “Equiv- alence of effective non-hermitian hamiltonians in the context of open quantum systems and strongly correlated electron systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 196401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [29]

    Fourth-order exceptional points in correlated quantum many-body systems,

    L. Crippa, J. C. Budich, and G. Sangiovanni, “Fourth-order exceptional points in correlated quantum many-body systems,” Phys. Rev. B104, L121109 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [30]

    Exploring the riemann-surface topology of a non-hermitian superconducting qubit us- ing shortcuts to adiabaticity,

    Serra Erdamar, Maryam Abbasi, Weijian Chen, Niklas H¨ ornedal, Aur´ elia Chenu, and Kater W. Murch, “Exploring the riemann-surface topology of a non-hermitian superconducting qubit us- ing shortcuts to adiabaticity,” PRX Quantum7, 010337 (2026)

    work page 2026

  30. [31]

    Quantum exceptional points of non-hermitian hamiltonians and liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps,

    Fabrizio Minganti, Adam Miranowicz, Ravin- dra W. Chhajlany, and Franco Nori, “Quantum exceptional points of non-hermitian hamiltonians and liouvillians: The effects of quantum jumps,” Phys. Rev. A100, 062131 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [32]

    Quantum jumps in the non-hermitian dynamics of a superconduct- ing qubit,

    Weijian Chen, Maryam Abbasi, Yogesh N. Joglekar, and Kater W. Murch, “Quantum jumps in the non-hermitian dynamics of a superconduct- ing qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 140504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [33]

    Interaction-induced liouvillian skin ef- fect in a fermionic chain with a two-body loss,

    Shu Hamanaka, Kazuki Yamamoto, and Tsuneya Yoshida, “Interaction-induced liouvillian skin ef- fect in a fermionic chain with a two-body loss,” Phys. Rev. B108, 155114 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [34]

    Constraining work fluctuations of non-hermitian dynamics across the exceptional point of a superconducting qubit,

    Serra Erdamar, Maryam Abbasi, Byung Ha, Wei- jian Chen, Jacob Muldoon, Yogesh Joglekar, and Kater W. Murch, “Constraining work fluctuations of non-hermitian dynamics across the exceptional point of a superconducting qubit,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022013 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [35]

    Measuring the knot of non-hermitian degeneracies and non-commuting braids,

    Yogesh SS Patil, Judith H¨ oller, Parker A Henry, Chitres Guria, Yiming Zhang, Luyao Jiang, Ne- nad Kralj, Nicholas Read, and Jack GE Harris, “Measuring the knot of non-hermitian degeneracies and non-commuting braids,” Nature607, 271–275 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [36]

    Manipulating spectral topology and excep- tional points by nonlinearity in non-hermitian po- lariton systems,

    Jan Wingenbach, Stefan Schumacher, and Xuekai Ma, “Manipulating spectral topology and excep- tional points by nonlinearity in non-hermitian po- lariton systems,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013148 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [37]

    Dynamically encir- cling an exceptional point through phase-tracked closed-loop control,

    Sen Zhang, Yangyu Huang, Lei Yu, Kaixuan He, Ning Zhou, Dingbang Xiao, Xuezhong Wu, Franco Nori, Hui Jing, and Xin Zhou, “Dynamically encir- cling an exceptional point through phase-tracked closed-loop control,” Communications Physics8, 344 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [38]

    Higher-order ex- ceptional points in composite non-hermitian sys- tems,

    Jan Wiersig and Weijian Chen, “Higher-order ex- ceptional points in composite non-hermitian sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033034 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [39]

    Symmetry-protected multifold excep- tional points and their topological characteriza- tion,

    Pierre Delplace, Tsuneya Yoshida, and Yasuhiro Hatsugai, “Symmetry-protected multifold excep- tional points and their topological characteriza- tion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [40]

    Realizing exceptional points of any order in the presence of symmetry,

    Sharareh Sayyad and Flore K. Kunst, “Realizing exceptional points of any order in the presence of symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023130 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [41]

    Discriminant indicators with gener- alized inversion symmetry,

    Tsuneya Yoshida, Ryo Okugawa, and Yasuhiro Hatsugai, “Discriminant indicators with gener- alized inversion symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B105, 085109 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [42]

    Symmetry- protected exceptional and nodal points in non- Hermitian systems,

    Sharareh Sayyad, Marcus Stalhammar, Lukas Rødland, and Flore K. Kunst, “Symmetry- protected exceptional and nodal points in non- Hermitian systems,” SciPost Phys.15, 200 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [43]

    Abelian spectral topology of multifold exceptional points,

    Marcus St˚ alhammar and Lukas Rødland, “Abelian spectral topology of multifold exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033246 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [44]

    To be more precise, these methods are developed to study non-derogatory EPs and may not be useful to explore not work for derogatory degeneracies

    work page

  44. [45]

    Converting non-Hermitian degeneracies of any order: Hierarchies of exceptional points and degeneracy manifolds

    Grigory A. Starkov and Sharareh Sayyad, “Con- verting non-hermitian degeneracies of any order: Hierarchies of exceptional points and degeneracy manifolds,” arXiv:2604.16139 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [46]

    This means that the matrix can not be fully diag- onalized; however, it can be brought to the Jordan canonical form instead [106]

    work page

  46. [47]

    Uniform response theory of non-hermitian systems: Non- 22 hermitian physics beyond the exceptional point,

    Subhajyoti Bid and Henning Schomerus, “Uniform response theory of non-hermitian systems: Non- 22 hermitian physics beyond the exceptional point,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023062 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [48]

    Bid and H

    Subhajyoti Bid and Henning Schomerus, “Frag- mented exceptional points and their bulk and edge realizations in lattice models,” (2025), arXiv:2507.22158

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [49]

    Multi-block exceptional points in open quantum systems

    Aysel Shiralieva, Grigory A. Starkov, and Bj¨ orn Trauzettel, “Multi-block exceptional points in open quantum systems,” (2025), arXiv:2509.11856

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [50]

    If we want to focus on the behavior of a particular degenerate eigenvalue, we can project out all the other eigenvalues

    In principle, an NH system can host several de- fective and nondefective degeneracies at different eigenvalues. If we want to focus on the behavior of a particular degenerate eigenvalue, we can project out all the other eigenvalues. As such, to simplify the discussion, we may assume that there is only a single degenerate eigenvalue whose algebraic mul- ti...

    work page

  50. [51]

    Non- hermitian topological sensors,

    Jan Carl Budich and Emil J. Bergholtz, “Non- hermitian topological sensors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [52]

    Symmetry and higher-order exceptional points,

    Ipsita Mandal and Emil J. Bergholtz, “Symmetry and higher-order exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [53]

    A tropical geometric approach to exceptional points,

    Ayan Banerjee, Rimika Jaiswal, Madhusudan Manjunath, and Awadhesh Narayan, “A tropical geometric approach to exceptional points,” Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America120, 1–8 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [54]

    Theory for the spectral splitting exponent of exceptional points,

    Shu-Xuan Wang and Zhongbo Yan, “Theory for the spectral splitting exponent of exceptional points,” Phys. Rev. B112, 195125 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [55]

    Amoeba formulation of non-bloch band theory in arbitrary dimensions,

    Hong-Yi Wang, Fei Song, and Zhong Wang, “Amoeba formulation of non-bloch band theory in arbitrary dimensions,” Phys. Rev. X14, 021011 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [56]

    Constraints of internal symme- try on the non-hermitian skin effect and bidirec- tional skin effect under the action of the hermitian conjugate of time-reversal symmetry,

    Shu-Xuan Wang, “Constraints of internal symme- try on the non-hermitian skin effect and bidirec- tional skin effect under the action of the hermitian conjugate of time-reversal symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B109, L081108 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [57]

    Topological origin of non-hermitian skin effect in higher dimensions and uniform spec- tra,

    Haiping Hu, “Topological origin of non-hermitian skin effect in higher dimensions and uniform spec- tra,” Science Bulletin70, 51–57 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [58]

    Anatomy of higher-order non-hermitian skin and boundary modes,

    Fan Yang and Emil J. Bergholtz, “Anatomy of higher-order non-hermitian skin and boundary modes,” Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023233 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [59]

    Symplectic- amoeba formulation of the non-bloch band theory for one-dimensional two-band systems,

    Shin Kaneshiro and Robert Peters, “Symplectic- amoeba formulation of the non-bloch band theory for one-dimensional two-band systems,” Phys. Rev. B112, 075408 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [60]

    An amoeba is an image of a polynomial’s zero set under the logarithmic map [58]

    work page

  60. [61]

    Amoebas of algebraic vari- eties,

    Grigory Mikhalkin, “Amoebas of algebraic vari- eties,” (2001), arXiv:0108225

    work page 2001

  61. [62]

    First order eigenvalue perturbation theory and the newton diagram,

    Julio Moro and Froil´ an M. Dopico, “First order eigenvalue perturbation theory and the newton diagram,” inApplied Mathematics and Scientific Computing, edited by Zlatko Drmaˇ c, Vjeran Hari, Luka Sopta, Zvonimir Tutek, and Kreˇ simir Veseli´ c (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2003) pp. 143–175

    work page 2003

  62. [63]

    Perturbation theory of non- conjugate operators,

    V.B. Lidskii, “Perturbation theory of non- conjugate operators,” USSR Computational Math- ematics and Mathematical Physics6, 73–85 (1966)

    work page 1966

  63. [64]

    Interested read- ers are encouraged to consult Refs

    We will not further go into details. Interested read- ers are encouraged to consult Refs. [59, 60]

    work page

  64. [65]

    Min-plus methods in eigenvalue per- turbation theory and generalised Lidskii-Vishik- Ljusternik theorem,

    Marianne Akian, Ravindra Bapat, and Stephane Gaubert, “Min-plus methods in eigenvalue per- turbation theory and generalised Lidskii-Vishik- Ljusternik theorem,” (2006), arXiv:0402090

    work page 2006

  65. [66]

    This is the reason for dealing with semiringR min

    We note that there is no subtraction in the tropi- cal arithmetic. This is the reason for dealing with semiringR min

    work page

  66. [67]

    Repetitions are allowed in monomi- als

    A monomial is any product of variables in tropical semiringR min. Repetitions are allowed in monomi- als

    work page

  67. [68]

    Lecture notes in a combinatorial introduction to tropical geometry,

    Bernd Sturmfels, “Lecture notes in a combinatorial introduction to tropical geometry,” (2007)

    work page 2007

  68. [69]

    The trace of the exterior power𝜎 𝑘 = tr (︀ ∧𝑘ℋ )︀ can be also expressed as𝜎 𝑘 = (−1)−𝑘𝑝𝑘 with [37]𝑝 𝑘 = − 𝑠𝑘+𝑝1𝑠𝑘−1+...+𝑝𝑘−1𝑠1 𝑘 ,and𝑠 𝑘 = tr [︀ ℋ𝑘]︀

    work page

  69. [70]

    Knot topology of exceptional point and non-hermitian no-go theorem,

    Haiping Hu, Shikang Sun, and Shu Chen, “Knot topology of exceptional point and non-hermitian no-go theorem,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, L022064 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [71]

    This is easy to obtain as ( ˜𝑘𝑥𝑡+𝑖 ˜𝑘𝑦)𝑞 = Σ𝑞 𝑚=0 (︀𝑞 𝑚 )︀ (𝑖˜𝑘𝑦)𝑞−𝑚˜𝑘𝑚 𝑥 𝑡𝑚

    work page

  71. [72]

    We note that when all eigenvalues are the same and are perturbed in an identical fashion,𝜎 𝑛 becomes zero and hence, the tropicallization gives rise to zero tropical roots, i.e.,𝜔 0 = 0

    work page

  72. [73]

    Braiding topology of symmetry-protected degen- eracy points in non-hermitian systems,

    Jia-Zheng Li, Kai Bai, Cheng Guo, Tian-Rui Liu, Liang Fang, Duanduan Wan, and Meng Xiao, “Braiding topology of symmetry-protected degen- eracy points in non-hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. B109, L041102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  73. [74]

    Kurosh,Higher Algebra(Mir Publishers, Moscow, 1972)

    A.G. Kurosh,Higher Algebra(Mir Publishers, Moscow, 1972)

    work page 1972

  74. [75]

    Machine learning of knot topology in non-hermitian band braids,

    Jiangzhi Chen, Zi Wang, Yu-Tao Tan, Ce Wang, and Jie Ren, “Machine learning of knot topology in non-hermitian band braids,” Communications Physics7, 209 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [76]

    Luyao Jiang,Nonreciprocal dynamics in a cryo- genic optomechanical system(Yale University, 2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [77]

    It can be proved that there is a transformation that brings a generically perturbed traceless Jor- dan block (𝐴(𝜖)) of order𝑛, with nonzero pertur- bation induced enetries on the𝑛th row, into an- other Jordan block ( ˜𝐴) of the same order whose perturbation contribution is merely encoded in its (𝑛,1) element; see Ref. [107]. Note that ˜𝐴(𝜖) is sometimes d...

    work page

  77. [78]

    The procedure is similar to the previous cases for 3×3 Jordan forms; see also Ref. [108]

    work page

  78. [79]

    On matrices depending on param- eters,

    V I Arnold, “On matrices depending on param- eters,” Russian Mathematical Surveys26, 29–43 (1971)

    work page 1971

  79. [80]

    Enhancing the sensitivity of fre- quency and energy splitting detection by using ex- ceptional points: Application to microcavity sen- 23 sors for single-particle detection,

    Jan Wiersig, “Enhancing the sensitivity of fre- quency and energy splitting detection by using ex- ceptional points: Application to microcavity sen- 23 sors for single-particle detection,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  80. [81]

    Metrology with𝒫𝒯-symmetric cavities: Enhanced sensitivity near the𝒫𝒯-phase transition,

    Zhong-Peng Liu, Jing Zhang, S ¸ahin Kaya¨Ozdemir, Bo Peng, Hui Jing, Xin-You L¨ u, Chun-Wen Li, Lan Yang, Franco Nori, and Yu-xi Liu, “Metrology with𝒫𝒯-symmetric cavities: Enhanced sensitivity near the𝒫𝒯-phase transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110802 (2016)

    work page 2016

Showing first 80 references.