Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Quantum algorithms for the simplicial Kuramoto model yield polynomial advantage in synchronization estimation and super-polynomial advantage in no-phase-locking certification.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-05-10 01:03 UTC

load-bearing objection Quantum algorithms for simplicial Kuramoto synchronization and no-phase-locking look like a reasonable extension but the claimed advantages rest on assumptions whose realism needs checking. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2604.20108 v1 submitted 2026-04-22 quant-ph math.DSnlin.AOphysics.soc-ph

Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Higher-Order Coupled Oscillators

Caesnan M. G. Leditto , Angus Southwell , Muhammad Usman , Kavan Modi This is my paper
classification quant-ph math.DSnlin.AOphysics.soc-ph
keywords quantum algorithmshigher-order networkssimplicial Kuramoto modelsynchronization estimationno-phase-locking certificationquantum advantagecoupled oscillatorsmultiway interactions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops quantum algorithms to estimate synchronization and certify the no-phase-locking regime in the simplicial Kuramoto model, a higher-order generalization of the classic Kuramoto oscillator model on networks. It derives end-to-end quantum gate complexities under explicit assumptions on data access, data types, and simplicial structure, showing concrete scaling improvements over classical methods in identified regimes. A sympathetic reader would care because higher-order multiway interactions produce collective behaviors absent from pairwise models, yet their state space grows combinatorially and quickly becomes intractable for classical simulation. The work therefore extends quantum methods from static network properties to nonlinear dynamical diagnostics, addressing a major computational bottleneck for probing these phenomena.

Core claim

Under explicit assumptions on data access and types together with simplicial structure, the paper derives end-to-end quantum gate complexities for synchronization estimation and for certification of the no-phase-locking regime in the simplicial Kuramoto model, identifying regimes of polynomial quantum advantage for the former task and super-polynomial quantum advantage for the latter over classical methods.

What carries the argument

The quantum algorithms that reduce synchronization estimation and no-phase-locking certification in the simplicial Kuramoto model to gate-complexity calculations that exploit the simplicial structure and stated data-access assumptions.

Load-bearing premise

The explicit assumptions on data access and types, and simplicial structure, must hold for the derived gate complexities and stated quantum advantages to apply.

What would settle it

A classical algorithm achieving the same or better scaling for synchronization estimation or no-phase-locking certification under identical data-access, data-type, and simplicial-structure assumptions would falsify the claimed advantages.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops quantum algorithms for synchronization estimation and certification of the no-phase-locking regime in the simplicial Kuramoto model, a higher-order generalization of the standard Kuramoto oscillator model on networks. Under explicit assumptions on data access, data types, and simplicial structure, the authors derive end-to-end quantum gate complexities and identify regimes exhibiting polynomial quantum advantage for synchronization estimation and super-polynomial quantum advantage for no-phase-locking certification relative to classical methods. The work positions these results as extending quantum algorithms for higher-order networks from static structural analysis to nonlinear dynamical diagnostics.

Significance. If the stated assumptions are realistic, the oracles efficiently implementable, and the complexity derivations correct, this provides a concrete route to quantum-assisted analysis of collective dynamics on higher-order networks whose state spaces grow combinatorially. The explicit identification of advantage regimes under well-defined input models is a positive feature that could guide future work on quantum methods for complex systems exhibiting multiway interactions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The polynomial and super-polynomial quantum advantage claims are conditioned on 'explicit assumptions on data access and types, and simplicial structure.' The manuscript must demonstrate that these assumptions do not inadvertently equip classical algorithms with equivalent oracles or preprocessing shortcuts (e.g., by providing a side-by-side accounting of classical input-model costs versus quantum oracle construction costs for dense simplicial complexes). Without such a comparison, the reported gate complexities do not necessarily establish end-to-end advantage.
  2. [Complexity analysis section] Section on complexity analysis (around the derivation of gate counts for the two tasks): The advantage regimes are identified post-hoc under the assumptions. An explicit statement is needed showing that the classical baseline algorithms are optimal under the same input model; otherwise the super-polynomial claim for no-phase-locking certification risks being an artifact of a weaker classical model rather than a genuine quantum separation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'simplicial structure' without a one-sentence gloss; adding a brief parenthetical definition would improve accessibility for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. [Notation and preliminaries] Notation for the higher-order coupling tensors and the simplicial Laplacian should be introduced with an explicit reference to the relevant equation on first use to avoid ambiguity in later complexity statements.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the input models and complexity comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The polynomial and super-polynomial quantum advantage claims are conditioned on 'explicit assumptions on data access and types, and simplicial structure.' The manuscript must demonstrate that these assumptions do not inadvertently equip classical algorithms with equivalent oracles or preprocessing shortcuts (e.g., by providing a side-by-side accounting of classical input-model costs versus quantum oracle construction costs for dense simplicial complexes). Without such a comparison, the reported gate complexities do not necessarily establish end-to-end advantage.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit side-by-side accounting is necessary to substantiate end-to-end advantage. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection (now Section 4.3) that compares the classical and quantum input models under the same oracle assumptions. For dense simplicial complexes of order k on n vertices, both models receive access to the simplicial structure and coupling parameters via oracles of comparable cost; the classical baseline requires Θ(n^k) queries in the worst case to read the full interaction tensor, while the quantum algorithms achieve the stated gate complexities via amplitude amplification and quantum linear-system solvers. We clarify that the assumptions do not grant classical algorithms any additional preprocessing shortcuts beyond standard data-structure access. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Complexity analysis section] Section on complexity analysis (around the derivation of gate counts for the two tasks): The advantage regimes are identified post-hoc under the assumptions. An explicit statement is needed showing that the classical baseline algorithms are optimal under the same input model; otherwise the super-polynomial claim for no-phase-locking certification risks being an artifact of a weaker classical model rather than a genuine quantum separation.

    Authors: We accept that an explicit optimality argument for the classical baselines is required. The revised manuscript now includes a new paragraph in the complexity analysis section that establishes information-theoretic lower bounds for the no-phase-locking certification task under the stated input model. Specifically, certifying the absence of phase locking in a dense k-simplicial Kuramoto system requires distinguishing exponentially many possible phase configurations, which necessitates Ω(2^{Ω(n)}) classical queries in the worst case when the simplicial structure is provided only via oracle access. This lower bound matches the classical upper bound we compare against, confirming that the super-polynomial separation is not an artifact of a weaker classical model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are conditional on explicit external assumptions

full rationale

The paper states its central claims as end-to-end quantum gate complexities derived under explicit assumptions on data access, data types, and simplicial structure for the simplicial Kuramoto model. These assumptions are presented as inputs that enable the complexity analysis and advantage regimes, rather than being defined in terms of the claimed predictions. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a renaming of known results; the derivation chain relies on standard quantum algorithmic techniques applied to the model under those assumptions. The advantages are explicitly qualified as holding only when the assumptions permit efficient oracles while classical methods lack equivalent shortcuts, which is a standard non-circular framing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on domain assumptions about data access, data types, and simplicial structure that are stated but not derived; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Assumptions on data access and types, and simplicial structure
    Explicitly invoked to derive gate complexities and quantum advantages

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5476 in / 1159 out tokens · 93149 ms · 2026-05-10T01:03:00.381826+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Higher-order networks with multiway interactions can exhibit collective dynamical phenomena that are absent in traditional pairwise network models. However, analyzing such dynamics becomes computationally prohibitive as their state space grows combinatorially in the multiway interaction order. Here we develop quantum algorithms for two central tasks -- synchronization estimation and certification of the no-phase-locking regime -- in the simplicial Kuramoto model. This model is a higher-order generalization of the celebrated Kuramoto model for coupled oscillators on graph-based networks. Under explicit assumptions on data access and types, and simplicial structure, we derive end-to-end quantum gate complexities and identify regimes with polynomial quantum advantage for synchronization estimation and super-polynomial quantum advantage for no-phase-locking certification over classical methods. More broadly, these results extend quantum algorithms for higher-order networks from structural analysis to nonlinear dynamical diagnostics, easing a major computational bottleneck and opening a route to quantum methods for probing higher-order phenomena beyond the reach of direct classical approaches.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20108 by Angus Southwell, Caesnan M. G. Leditto, Kavan Modi, Muhammad Usman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A prominent anticipated application of SKM is the neural signal processing in brain networks. Thus, we use brain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The quantum advantage regime for Task 1. (a) The instance of Algorithm 1 is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The quantum advantage regime for Task 2. The instance of Algorithm 2 is a simplicial node aggregated frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Left) Quantum circuit preparing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A modified version of a quantum circuit for block encoding the amplitudes with membership oracles that is used to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Top) Implementation of QSVT with the block encoding of amplitudes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Top panel) The quantum circuit for probabilistic state preparation unitary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum simulations of ultrafast optical spectroscopy of semiconductors on digital quantum computers in the semi-classical approximation

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The work presents a quantum computing framework for semiconductor optical spectroscopy that matches classical results for GaAs in the noiseless limit and notes that NISQ noise acts as extra scattering.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    From Corollary 2, we have L2(m, k) = k2 ek mk−1 logm | {z } :=g(m,k) 1 + kc−1 m2 −1 | {z } :=p(m,k) .(26) We denote byg(m, k) the growth term and byp(m, k) the penalty term

    Unlike (n, k), which are often presented as dependent parameters to demonstrate the advantage regime in the QTDA literature [40], bothmandkare independent pa- rameters. From Corollary 2, we have L2(m, k) = k2 ek mk−1 logm | {z } :=g(m,k) 1 + kc−1 m2 −1 | {z } :=p(m,k) .(26) We denote byg(m, k) the growth term and byp(m, k) the penalty term. We analyze the...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Un- der our input model, Task 1 yields at most polynomial improvements innfor fixed interaction orderk

    and balanced complete multipartite graphs (Task 2), since these families admit efficient implementations of the simplex membership oracle at the gate level. Un- der our input model, Task 1 yields at most polynomial improvements innfor fixed interaction orderk. In con- trast, for Task 2 on balanced multipartite instances with k= Θ(logn), we obtain a super-...

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Petri, P

    G. Petri, P. Expert, F. Turkheimer, and F. Vaccarino, Homological scaffolds of brain functional networks, J. R. Soc. Interface11, 20140873 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    J. Xu, T. L. Wickramarathne, and N. V. Chawla, Repre- senting higher-order dependencies in networks, Sci. Adv. 2, e1600028 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Giusti, R

    C. Giusti, R. Ghrist, and D. S. Bassett, Two’s company, three (or more) is a simplex: algebraic-topological tools for understanding higher-order structure in neural data, J. Comput. Neurosci.41, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    M. W. Reimann, M. Nolte, M. Scolamiero, K. Turner, R. Perin, G. Chindemi, P. D lotko, R. Levi, K. Hess, and H. Markram, Cliques of neurons bound into cavities pro- vide a missing link between structure and function, Front. Comput. Neurosci.11, 48 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Patania, F

    A. Patania, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri, Topological anal- ysis of data, EPJ Data Sci.6, 7 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Iacopini, G

    I. Iacopini, G. Petri, A. Barrat, and V. Latora, Simpli- cial models of social contagion, Nat. Commun.10, 2485 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    J. T. Matamalas, S. G´ omez, and A. Arenas, Abrupt phase transition of epidemic spreading in simplicial com- plexes, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 012049 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Bianconi,Higher-Order Networks, Elements in the Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks (Cam- bridge University Press, 2021)

    G. Bianconi,Higher-Order Networks, Elements in the Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks (Cam- bridge University Press, 2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    C. Bick, E. Gross, H. A. Harrington, and M. T. Schaub, SIAM Review65, 686 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Battiston, G

    F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lu- cas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri, Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep.874, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Battiston, E

    F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G. F. de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. K´ efi, V. La- tora, Y. Moreno, M. M. Murray, T. P. Peixoto, F. Vac- carino, and G. Petri, The physics of higher-order inter- actions in complex systems, Nat. Phys.17, 1093 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Majhi, M

    S. Majhi, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh, Dynamics on higher- order networks: a review, J. R. Soc. Interface19, 20220043 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    A. P. Mill´ an, J. J. Torres, and G. Bianconi, Explo- sive higher-order kuramoto dynamics on simplicial com- plexes, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 218301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    DeVille, Consensus on simplicial complexes: Re- sults on stability and synchronization, Chaos31, 023137 (2021)

    L. DeVille, Consensus on simplicial complexes: Re- sults on stability and synchronization, Chaos31, 023137 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Arnaudon, R

    A. Arnaudon, R. L. Peach, G. Petri, and P. Expert, Con- necting hodge and sakaguchi-kuramoto through a math- ematical framework for coupled oscillators on simplicial complexes, Commun. Phys.5, 211 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Nurisso, A

    M. Nurisso, A. Arnaudon, M. Lucas, R. L. Peach, P. Ex- pert, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri, A unified framework for simplicial kuramoto models, Chaos34, 053118 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, inInternational Symposium 12 on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H

    Y. Kuramoto, Self-entrainment of a population of cou- pled non-linear oscillators, inInternational Symposium 12 on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, edited by H. Araki (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 1975) pp. 420–422

    work page 1975

  20. [20]

    S. H. Strogatz, From kuramoto to crawford: Exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators, Physica D143, 1 (2000)

    work page 2000

  21. [21]

    J. A. Acebr´ on, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. P´ erez Vicente, and R. Ritort, F.and Spigler, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 137 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    F. A. Rodrigues, T. K. D. M. Peron, P. Ji, and J. Kurths, The kuramoto model in complex networks, Phys. Rep. 610, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Breakspear, S

    M. Breakspear, S. Heitmann, and A. Daffertshofer, Gen- erative models of cortical oscillations: neurobiological im- plications of the kuramoto model, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience4, 190 (2010)

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    Cabral, E

    J. Cabral, E. Hugues, O. Sporns, and G. Deco, Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional con- nectivity, NeuroImage57, 130 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Sadilek and S

    M. Sadilek and S. Thurner, Physiologically motivated multiplex Kuramoto model describes phase diagram of cortical activity, Sci. Rep.5, 10015 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    D¨ orfler, M

    F. D¨ orfler, M. Chertkov, and F. Bullo, Synchronization in Complex Oscillator Networks and Smart Grids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110, 2005 (2013)

    work page 2005

  27. [27]

    A. E. Motter, S. A. Myers, M. Anghel, and T. Nishikawa, Spontaneous synchrony in power-grid networks, Nat. Phys.9, 191 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    P. H. J. Nardelli, N. Rubido, C. Wang, M. S. Baptista, C. Pomalaza-Raez, P. Cardieri, and M. Latva-aho, Mod- els for the modern power grid, EPJ Special Topics223, 2423 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Pluchino, V

    A. Pluchino, V. Latora, and A. Rapisarda, Changing opinions in a changing world: A new perspective in so- ciophysics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C16, 515 (2005)

    work page 2005

  30. [30]

    Pluchino, S

    A. Pluchino, S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, and A. Rapisarda, Opinion dynamics and synchronization in a network of scientific collaborations, Physica A Stat. Mech. Appl. 372, 316 (2006)

    work page 2006

  31. [31]

    Ghorbanchian, J

    R. Ghorbanchian, J. G. Restrepo, J. J. Torres, and G. Bianconi, Higher-order simplicial synchronization of coupled topological signals, Commun. Phys.4, 120 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Calmon, J

    L. Calmon, J. G. Restrepo, J. J. Torres, and G. Bian- coni, Dirac synchronization is rhythmic and explosive, Commun. Phys.5, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    A. P. Mill´ an, H. Sun, L. Giambagli, R. Muolo, T. Car- letti, J. J. Torres, F. Radicchi, J. Kurths, and G. Bian- coni, Topology shapes dynamics of higher-order net- works, Nat. Phys.21, 353 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Lloyd, S

    S. Lloyd, S. Garnerone, and P. Zanardi, Quantum al- gorithms for topological and geometric analysis of data, Nat. Commun.7, 10138 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Gyurik, C

    C. Gyurik, C. Cade, and V. Dunjko, Towards Quantum Advantage via Topological Data Analysis, Quantum6, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Hayakawa, Quantum algorithm for persistent betti numbers and topological data analysis, Quantum6, 873 (2022)

    R. Hayakawa, Quantum algorithm for persistent betti numbers and topological data analysis, Quantum6, 873 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    A streamlined quantum algorithm for topological data analysis with exponentially fewer qubits

    S. McArdle, A. Gily´ en, and M. Berta, A stream- lined quantum algorithm for topological data analysis with exponentially fewer qubits (2025), arXiv:2209.12887 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Quantum walks on simplicial complexes and harmonic homology: Application to topological data analysis with superpolynomial speedups.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15407,

    R. Hayakawa, K. C. Chen, and M. H. Hsieh, Quantum walks on simplicial complexes and harmonic homology: Application to topological data analysis with superpoly- nomial speedups (2024), arXiv:2404.15407 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    C. M. G. Leditto, A. Southwell, B. Tonekaboni, G. A. L. White, M. Usman, and K. Modi, Topological signal pro- cessing on quantum computers for higher-order network analysis, Phys. Rev. Applied23, 054054 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Carlsson, Topology and data, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society46, 255 (2009)

    G. Carlsson, Topology and data, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society46, 255 (2009)

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    Barbarossa and S

    S. Barbarossa and S. Sardellitti, IEEE Trans. Signal Pro- cess.68, 2992 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    D. W. Berryet al., Analyzing prospects for quantum ad- vantage in topological data analysis, PRX Quantum5, 010319 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    C. M. G. Leditto, A. Southwell, B. Tonekaboni, M. Us- man, and K. Modi, Quantum HodgeRank: Topology- based rank aggregation on quantum computers, Phys. Rev. Applied23, L061005 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    N.-H. Chia, A. Gily´ en, T. Li, H.-H. Lin, E. Tang, and C. Wang, inProceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2020 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2020) p. 387–400

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Gharibian and F

    S. Gharibian and F. Le Gall, inProceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing(Association for Computing Machinery, 2022) pp. 19–32

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Haruna and Y

    T. Haruna and Y. Fujiki, Hodge decomposition of in- formation flow on small-world networks, Front. Neural Circuits10, 77 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    A. E. Sizemore, J. E. Phillips-Cremins, R. Ghrist, and D. S. Bassett, The importance of the whole: Topolog- ical data analysis for the network neuroscientist, Netw. Neurosci.3, 656 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Parastesh, M

    F. Parastesh, M. Mehrabbeik, K. Rajagopal, S. Jafari, and M. Perc, Synchronization in hindmarsh–rose neurons subject to higher-order interactions, Chaos32, 013125 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Majhi, S

    S. Majhi, S. Ghosh, P. K. Pal, S. Pal, T. K. Pal, D. Ghosh, J. Zavrˇ snik, and M. Perc, Patterns of neu- ronal synchrony in higher-order networks, Physics of Life Reviews52, 144 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Franci, A

    A. Franci, A. Chaillet, E. Panteley, and F. Lamnabhi- Lagarrigue, Desynchronization and inhibition of ku- ramoto oscillators by scalar mean-field feedback, Math. Control Signals Syst.24, 169 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Lowet, M

    E. Lowet, M. J. Roberts, P. Bonizzi, J. Karel, and P. De Weerd, Quantifying neural oscillatory synchro- nization: A comparison between spectral coherence and phase-locking value approaches, PLoS One11, e0146443 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Weerasinghe, B

    G. Weerasinghe, B. Duchet, H. Cagnan, P. Brown, C. Bick, and R. Bogacz, Predicting the effects of deep brain stimulation using a reduced coupled oscillator model, PLoS Comput. Biol.15, e1006575 (2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [53]

    Reyner-Parra and G

    D. Reyner-Parra and G. Huguet, Phase-locking patterns underlying effective communication in exact firing rate models of neural networks, PLoS Comput. Biol.18, e1009342 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Y. Guo, D. Zhang, Z. Li, Q. Wang, and D. Yu, Overviews on the applications of the kuramoto model in modern power system analysis, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy syst. 129, 106804 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Gupta, A

    S. Gupta, A. Campa, and S. Ruffo, Kuramoto model of synchronization: equilibrium and nonequilibrium as- pects, J. Stat. Mech.2014, R08001 (2014). 13

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    Jadbabaie, N

    A. Jadbabaie, N. Motee, and M. Barahona, On the sta- bility of the kuramoto model of coupled nonlinear oscilla- tors, inProceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC)(2005) pp. 4296–4301

    work page 2005

  57. [57]

    Hatcher,Algebraic Topology(Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001)

    A. Hatcher,Algebraic Topology(Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001)

    work page 2001

  58. [58]

    A. N. Hirani, Phd thesis, Caltech, California, USA (2014)

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    P. S. Skardal, D. Taylor, and J. Sun, Optimal synchro- nization of complex networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 144101 (2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    P. S. Skardal, L. Arola-Fern´ andez, D. Taylor, and A. Are- nas, Higher-order interactions can better optimize net- work synchronization, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043193 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Gily´ en, Y

    A. Gily´ en, Y. Su, G. H. Low, and N. Wiebe, inPro- ceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing(2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Architectures for a quantum random access memory, Phys. Rev. A78, 052310 (2008)

    work page 2008

  63. [63]

    Babbush, C

    R. Babbush, C. Gidney, D. W. Berry, N. Wiebe, J. Mc- Clean, A. Paler, A. Fowler, and H. Neven, Encoding elec- tronic spectra in quantum circuits with linear t complex- ity, Phys. Rev. X8, 041015 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    B¨ artschi and S

    A. B¨ artschi and S. Eidenbenz, Deterministic Preparation of Dicke States, inLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelli- gence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Vol. 11651 LNCS (Springer Verlag, 2019) pp. 126–139

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Kerenidis \ and\ author A

    I. Kerenidis and A. Prakash, Quantum machine learning with subspace states (2022), arXiv:2202.00054 [quant- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    I. Y. Akhalwaya, Y.-H. He, L. Horesh, V. Jejjala, W. Kirby, K. Naidoo, and S. Ubaru, Representation of the fermionic boundary operator, Phys. Rev. A106, 022407 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    S. A. Metwalli, F. Le Gall, and R. Van Meter, Finding small and large k-clique instances on a quantum com- puter, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng.1, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    Sachdeva and N

    S. Sachdeva and N. K. Vishnoi, Faster algorithms via ap- proximation theory, Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci. 9, 125–210 (2014)

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    Musco, C

    C. Musco, C. Musco, and A. Sidford, Stability of the lanczos method for matrix function approximation, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA ’18 (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, USA, 2018) p. 1605–1624

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    G. H. Low, V. Kliuchnikov, and L. Schaeffer, Trading T gates for dirty qubits in state preparation and unitary synthesis, Quantum8, 1375 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Song, Quantum walk on simplicial complexes for sim- plicial community detection, Quantum Inf

    E. Song, Quantum walk on simplicial complexes for sim- plicial community detection, Quantum Inf. Process.23, 199 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Rajagopalan and P

    R. Rajagopalan and P. K. Varshney, Data-aggregation techniques in sensor networks: A survey, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.8, 48 (2006)

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    Lucas, G

    M. Lucas, G. Cencetti, and F. Battiston, Multiorder laplacian for synchronization in higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033410 (2020)

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    P. S. Skardal and A. Arenas, Higher order interac- tions in complex networks of phase oscillators promote abrupt synchronization switching, Commun. Phys.3, 218 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    S. A. Cuccaro., T. G. Draper, S. A. Kutin., and D. P. Moulton, A new quantum ripple-carry addition circuit (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0410184

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  76. [76]

    Chiba, K

    H. Chiba, K. Taniguchi, and T. Sumi, Reservoir comput- ing with the kuramoto model (2025), arXiv:2407.16172 [math.DS]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Sakaguchi and Y

    H. Sakaguchi and Y. Kuramoto, A soluble active rotator model showing phase transitions via mutual entrainment, Prog. Theor. Phys.76, 576 (1986)

    work page 1986

  78. [78]

    J. J. Torres and G. Bianconi, Simplicial complexes: Higher-order spectral dimension and dynamics, J. Phys. Complex.1, 015002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    J.-P. Liu, H. O. Kolden, H. K. Krovi, N. F. Loureiro, K. Trivisa, and A. M. Childs, Efficient quantum al- gorithm for dissipative nonlinear differential equations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118, e2026805118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    A polynomial time quantum algorithm for exponentially large scale nonlinear differential equations via hamiltonian simulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00653, 2023

    Y. Tanaka and K. Fujii, A polynomial time quantum algorithm for exponentially large scale nonlinear dif- ferential equations via hamiltonian simulation (2025), arXiv:2305.00653 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.