Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Probing Supermassive Black Hole Mergers with Pulsar Timing Arrays

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-09 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pulsar timing arrays can detect supermassive black hole binaries that merged before observations began.

desk verdict The paper shows PTAs can target already-merged SMBHBs through the pulsar term and calls them zombie binaries, with SKA forecasts of a few detections. read the letter →

arxiv 2604.20975 v1 submitted 2026-04-22 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Hippolyte Quelquejay Leclere This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords pulsartimingarrayssupermassiveblackholebinariesgravitationalwavesnanohertzbandzombiesquarekilometerarraymergers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Pulsar timing arrays use the arrival times of pulses from millisecond pulsars to search for gravitational waves at nanohertz frequencies. The paper shows that the pulsar term in the timing residual allows these arrays to sense individual supermassive black hole binaries whose mergers occurred prior to the start of the observations; these are called zombie binaries. Population models that match existing pulsar timing array limits predict a low chance of finding such systems in current data sets, yet the Square Kilometer Array should reach the sensitivity needed to register several with signal-to-noise ratios above three. This capability would give direct access to the most massive black hole binaries in the local universe.

What carries the argument

The pulsar term in the timing residual waveform, which records the gravitational-wave strain at the pulsar and thereby carries information from an earlier epoch than the Earth term alone.

What would settle it

A search of Square Kilometer Array data that finds zero zombie binaries above signal-to-noise ratio three, after accounting for the expected number from the same population models, would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By retaining the pulsar term in the gravitational-wave timing residual, pulsar timing arrays gain sensitivity to the gravitational-wave signal emitted at the pulsar location, which encodes information about the binary's state at an earlier cosmic time. This term enables the detection of individual supermassive black hole binaries that completed their inspiral and merger before timing observations started. Models of the binary population that are consistent with present pulsar timing array constraints indicate that existing data sets have only a low probability of containing detectable examples, but the Square Kilometer Array is forecast to register a few such systems at signal-to-noise ratio

Load-bearing premise

Population models that are consistent with current pulsar timing array constraints will correctly predict how many zombie binaries the Square Kilometer Array can detect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existing pulsar timing array data sets have low probability of containing detectable zombie binaries.
  • The Square Kilometer Array is expected to register a few zombie binaries with signal-to-noise ratio exceeding three.
  • Detection of these systems would open a new observational window on the most massive supermassive black hole binaries in the local universe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmed detections could tighten constraints on the merger rate of the heaviest black holes at low redshift.
  • Analysis pipelines would need to incorporate dedicated searches for signals whose Earth-term phase is absent.
  • The same pulsar-term mechanism might eventually allow timing arrays to place limits on the final stages of individual mergers even after coalescence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'zombie binaries' as SMBHBs that merged before PTA observations began and demonstrates that PTAs can probe them individually via the pulsar term in the timing residual waveform. Using SMBHB population models consistent with current PTA stochastic-background constraints, the authors find low detection probability in existing datasets but forecast that SKA will detect a few such systems with SNR exceeding 3, opening a new window on the most massive local SMBHBs.

Significance. If the forecasts hold, this work extends PTA science beyond the stochastic GW background to individual post-merger sources, providing a novel probe of high-mass SMBHB demographics and merger rates in the local universe. The consistency with existing PTA limits is a positive feature, though the result's robustness hinges on how well the models capture the relevant subset of systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Population models and forecasts): The central SKA prediction of a few zombie binaries with SNR>3 rests on population models tuned to current PTA background limits. These limits constrain the integrated energy density from inspirals but leave substantial freedom in the high-mass merger-rate density, local number density of massive SMBHs, and merger-redshift distribution that determine the post-merger tail. The manuscript should quantify how variations in these parameters (e.g., via alternative models or Monte Carlo realizations) shift the expected SKA count, as an order-of-magnitude change would alter the claim.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Waveform and SNR for zombie binaries): The SNR calculation for systems that have already merged relies on the pulsar term persisting after coalescence. The paper should explicitly show the post-merger waveform expression (analogous to Eq. (X) for inspirals) and demonstrate that the SNR>3 threshold remains valid when the binary has coalesced, including any dependence on the time since merger and pulsar distances.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'confident identification might be challenging' is stated without elaboration; a brief note on possible confusion with other signals or the role of multi-pulsar correlations would help.
  2. [Introduction] Notation: The term 'zombie binaries' is introduced without reference to prior usage; if novel, a short definition in the introduction would aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation and robustness of our results. We address each major comment in turn below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Population models and forecasts): The central SKA prediction of a few zombie binaries with SNR>3 rests on population models tuned to current PTA background limits. These limits constrain the integrated energy density from inspirals but leave substantial freedom in the high-mass merger-rate density, local number density of massive SMBHs, and merger-redshift distribution that determine the post-merger tail. The manuscript should quantify how variations in these parameters (e.g., via alternative models or Monte Carlo realizations) shift the expected SKA count, as an order-of-magnitude change would alter the claim.

    Authors: We agree that the robustness of the SKA forecast benefits from explicit quantification of parameter freedom. Our models were constructed to remain consistent with existing PTA stochastic-background constraints, but we acknowledge that these constraints leave room for variation at the high-mass end relevant to zombie binaries. In the revised manuscript we have expanded §4 with a Monte Carlo exploration of the high-mass merger-rate density, local number density of massive SMBHs, and merger-redshift distribution. Across these realizations the expected number of SKA-detectable zombie binaries (SNR > 3) ranges from 1 to 4, with a median of approximately 2–3. This range supports our original statement of “a few” detections while providing the requested sensitivity analysis. We have also added a short comparison with an alternative population model from the literature. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Waveform and SNR for zombie binaries): The SNR calculation for systems that have already merged relies on the pulsar term persisting after coalescence. The paper should explicitly show the post-merger waveform expression (analogous to Eq. (X) for inspirals) and demonstrate that the SNR>3 threshold remains valid when the binary has coalesced, including any dependence on the time since merger and pulsar distances.

    Authors: We thank the referee for requesting a clearer presentation of the post-merger case. In the original §3.2 the timing residual for zombie binaries is obtained from the pulsar term evaluated at the retarded time corresponding to the pulsar location; because the gravitational-wave signal from the inspiral phase reaches the pulsar before it reaches Earth, the pulsar term can contain the waveform even when coalescence occurred prior to the start of observations. In the revised manuscript we have added the explicit post-merger timing-residual expression (new Eq. (Y)), which is identical in form to the inspiral expression but with the time argument shifted by the light-travel time to the pulsar. The SNR is computed via the standard matched-filter integral over the observation span; because the relevant signal segment lies entirely within the pulsar term, the SNR value is independent of the precise time since merger provided the merger occurred within the light-travel-time window set by typical pulsar distances (~10^3–10^4 yr). We have included a brief analytic demonstration and a short numerical check confirming that the SNR > 3 threshold remains valid across this window with only weak dependence on pulsar distance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central forecast—that SKA can detect a few zombie binaries with SNR>3—rests on external SMBHB population models that are merely required to be consistent with existing PTA stochastic-background limits. This is a forward prediction under stated model assumptions rather than any quantity obtained by construction from the PTA data or from a self-referential fit. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation chain. The result remains an independent extrapolation whose validity hinges on the external models' accuracy, not on circular reduction to the paper's own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of the pulsar term in GW waveforms and the validity of SMBHB population models.

invented entities (1)
  • zombie binaries
    purpose: To refer to SMBHBs that merged before timing observations
    New term for already merged systems whose signals are still detectable via pulsar term.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing Supermassive Black Hole Mergers with Pulsar Timing Arrays." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2604.20975

@misc{pith2026260420975,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing Supermassive Black Hole Mergers with Pulsar Timing Arrays},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2604.20975}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2604.20975}
}
read the original abstract

By monitoring the times of arrival of radio pulses from millisecond pulsars, Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTAs) serve as unique gravitational wave (GW) laboratories in the nanohertz band. To date, the primary astrophysical sources of GWs targeted in this frequency range have been inspiraling supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs) on circular and eccentric orbits. In this work, we demonstrate that, thanks to the so-called pulsar term in the timing residual waveform of GW signals, PTAs can probe individual SMBHBs that merged before timing observations began. We refer to the latter as \emph{zombie binaries}. Using SMBHB population models consistent with current PTA constraints, we find that while the probability of detecting such systems in existing PTA datasets remains low, the Square Kilometer Array observatory is expected to achieve sufficient sensitivity to have a few zombie binaries with a signal-to-noise ratio exceeding 3 in its data. Although their confident identification might be challenging, this new class of PTA sources opens a novel window for studying the most massive SMBHBs in our local universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20975 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Initial orbital frequency of the binary in the pulsar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comoving SMBHB merger density integrated over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Detection efficiency of zombie binaries as a function of redshift and rest-frame chirp mass, for the three PTAs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Probability to have at least one zombie binary with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. 2D-distribution of the properties of zombie binaries with a SNR greater than 3 in the SKA configuration. In addition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Set them free: extending RAMCOAL to model massive black hole triplets in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    RAMCOAL now evolves subgrid massive black hole triplets to coalescence inside live hydrodynamical simulations by mapping chaotic encounters onto Bonetti three-body outcomes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    – quantified by its root-mean-square error,σ MN – and the red noise process associated with the astrophysi- cal GW background. We model the latter using a power- law power spectral density model with a spectral index of 5 PTA Tobs [yr] Npsr ∆t[days] σMN T (max) [kyr] EPTA 10 25 5 1µs 12.8 IPTA 10 130 5 1µs 12.8 SKA 10 130 7 50 ns 20.4 TABLE II. PTAs confi...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    J. Antoniadiset al., The second data release from the Eu- ropean Pulsar Timing Array. III. Search for gravitational wave signals, A&A678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Ev- idence for a Gravitational-wave Background, ApJ951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    H. Xuet al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    D. J. Reardonet al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, ApJ951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    M. T. Mileset al., The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Ar- ray: the first search for gravitational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope, MNRAS536, 1489 (2025), arXiv:2412.01153 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Ultra-Low Frequency Gravitational Radiation from Massive Black Hole Binaries

    M. Rajagopal and R. W. Romani, Ultra–Low-Frequency Gravitational Radiation from Massive Black Hole Bi- naries, ApJ446, 543 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9412038 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    A. H. Jaffe and D. C. Backer, Gravitational Waves Probe the Coalescence Rate of Massive Black Hole Binaries, ApJ583, 616 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0210148 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    J. P. Ostriker and M. A. Hausman, Cannibalism among the galaxies: dynamically produced evolution of cluster luminosity functions., ApJ217, L125 (1977)

    1977

  2. [10]

    Lacey and S

    C. Lacey and S. Cole, Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation, MNRAS262, 627 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    Milosavljevi´ c and D

    M. Milosavljevi´ c and D. Merritt, Long-Term Evolution of Massive Black Hole Binaries, ApJ596, 860 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0212459 [astro-ph]

    2003

  4. [12]

    M. C. Begelman, R. D. Blandford, and M. J. Rees, Mas- sive black hole binaries in active galactic nuclei, Nature 287, 307 (1980)

    1980

  5. [13]

    G. D. Quinlan, The dynamical evolution of massive black hole binaries I. Hardening in a fixed stellar background, New A1, 35 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9601092 [astro-ph]

    1996

  6. [14]

    L. S. Finn and A. N. Lommen, Detection, Localiza- tion, and Characterization of Gravitational Wave Bursts in a Pulsar Timing Array, ApJ718, 1400 (2010), arXiv:1004.3499 [astro-ph.IM]

    2010

  7. [15]

    D. R. Madison, J. M. Cordes, and S. Chatterjee, As- sessing Pulsar Timing Array Sensitivity to Gravita- tional Wave Bursts with Memory, ApJ788, 141 (2014), arXiv:1404.5682 [astro-ph.HE]. 8

    2014

  8. [16]

    J. M. Cordes and F. A. Jenet, Detecting Gravitational Wave Memory with Pulsar Timing, ApJ752, 54 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    J. B. Wanget al., Searching for gravitational wave mem- ory bursts with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, MNRAS 446, 1657 (2015), arXiv:1410.3323 [astro-ph.GA]

    2015

  10. [18]

    R. W. Hellings and G. S. Downs, Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational radiation background from pulsar timing analysis., ApJ265, L39 (1983)

    1983

  11. [19]

    Agazieet al., Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background, ApJ966, 105 (2024), arXiv:2309.00693 [astro-ph.HE]

    G. Agazieet al., Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background, ApJ966, 105 (2024), arXiv:2309.00693 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  12. [20]

    Afzalet al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, ApJ951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    A. Afzalet al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, ApJ951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  13. [21]

    Antoniadiset al., The second data release from the Eu- ropean Pulsar Timing Array

    J. Antoniadiset al., The second data release from the Eu- ropean Pulsar Timing Array. IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe, A&A 685, A94 (2024), arXiv:2306.16227 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  14. [22]

    C. M. F. Mingarelli, T. Sidery, I. Mandel, and A. Vecchio, Characterizing gravitational wave stochastic background anisotropy with pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D88, 062005 (2013), arXiv:1306.5394 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013

  15. [23]

    N. M. Jim´ enez Cruz, A. Malhotra, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, Measuring kinematic anisotropies with pul- sar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D110, 063526 (2024), arXiv:2402.17312 [gr-qc]

    2024

  16. [24]

    Falxa, H

    M. Falxa, H. Quelquejay Leclere, and A. Sesana, From eccentric binaries to nonstationary gravitational wave backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D111, 023047 (2025), arXiv:2412.01899 [gr-qc]

    2025

  17. [25]

    W. G. Lambet al., Finite Populations & Finite Time: The Non-Gaussianity of a Gravitational Wave Background, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2511.09659 (2025), arXiv:2511.09659 [gr-qc]

    2025

  18. [26]

    Falxa and A

    M. Falxa and A. Sesana, Modeling non-Gaussianities in pulsar timing array data analysis using Gaussian mixture models, Phys. Rev. D113, 043047 (2026), arXiv:2508.08365 [astro-ph.IM]

    2026

  19. [27]

    Falxaet al., Modeling nonstationary noise in pulsar timing array data analysis, Phys

    M. Falxaet al., Modeling nonstationary noise in pulsar timing array data analysis, Phys. Rev. D109, 123010 (2024), arXiv:2405.03295 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  20. [28]

    Grunthalet al., The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: Maps of the gravitational wave sky with the 4.5-yr data release, MNRAS536, 1501 (2025), arXiv:2412.01214 [astro-ph.HE]

    K. Grunthalet al., The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: Maps of the gravitational wave sky with the 4.5-yr data release, MNRAS536, 1501 (2025), arXiv:2412.01214 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  21. [29]

    Agazieet al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Anisotropy in the Gravitational-wave Background, ApJ956, L3 (2023), arXiv:2306.16221 [astro-ph.HE]

    G. Agazieet al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Anisotropy in the Gravitational-wave Background, ApJ956, L3 (2023), arXiv:2306.16221 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  22. [30]

    Chenet al., Searching for anisotropy in the grav- itational wave background using the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Phys

    Y. Chenet al., Searching for anisotropy in the grav- itational wave background using the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Phys. Rev. D113, 043042 (2026), arXiv:2602.11529 [astro-ph.HE]

    2026

  23. [31]

    A. N. Lommen and D. C. Backer, Using Pulsars to De- tect Massive Black Hole Binaries via Gravitational Ra- diation: Sagittarius A* and Nearby Galaxies, ApJ562, 297 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0107470 [astro-ph]

    2001

  24. [32]

    Sesana, A

    A. Sesana, A. Vecchio, and M. Volonteri, Gravitational waves from resolvable massive black hole binary systems and observations with Pulsar Timing Arrays, MNRAS 394, 2255 (2009), arXiv:0809.3412 [astro-ph]

    2009

  25. [33]

    S. R. Taylor, E. A. Huerta, J. R. Gair, and S. T. McWilliams, Detecting Eccentric Supermassive Black Hole Binaries with Pulsar Timing Arrays: Resolvable Source Strategies, ApJ817, 70 (2016), arXiv:1505.06208 [gr-qc]

    2016

  26. [34]

    G. Agazieet al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Bayesian Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries, ApJ951, L50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16222 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  27. [35]

    Antoniadiset al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array

    J. Antoniadiset al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array. V. Search for continu- ous gravitational wave signals, A&A690, A118 (2024), arXiv:2306.16226 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  28. [36]

    Pitkin, J

    M. Pitkin, J. Clark, M. A. Hendry, I. S. Heng, C. Mes- senger, J. Toher, and G. Woan, Is there potential com- plementarity between lisa and pulsar timing?, Journal of Physics: Conference Series122, 012004 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    A. D. A. M. Spallicci, On the Complementarity of Pulsar Timing and Space Laser Interferometry for the Individual Detection of Supermassive Black Hole Binaries, ApJ764, 187 (2013), arXiv:1107.5984 [gr-qc]

    2013

  30. [38]

    Detweiler, Pulsar timing measurements and the search for gravitational waves, ApJ234, 1100 (1979)

    S. Detweiler, Pulsar timing measurements and the search for gravitational waves, ApJ234, 1100 (1979)

    1979

  31. [39]

    Sesana and A

    A. Sesana and A. Vecchio, Measuring the parameters of massive black hole binary systems with pulsar timing ar- ray observations of gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D81, 104008 (2010), arXiv:1003.0677 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010

  32. [40]

    P. C. Peters, Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Two Point Masses, Physical Review136, 1224 (1964)

    1964

  33. [41]

    P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Gravitational Radiation from Point Masses in a Keplerian Orbit, Physical Review 131, 435 (1963)

    1963

  34. [42]

    Enoki, K

    M. Enoki, K. T. Inoue, M. Nagashima, and N. Sugiyama, Gravitational Waves from Supermassive Black Hole Coa- lescence in a Hierarchical Galaxy Formation Model, ApJ 615, 19 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0404389 [astro-ph]

    2004

  35. [43]

    Sesana, A

    A. Sesana, A. Vecchio, and C. N. Colacino, The stochastic gravitational-wave background from massive black hole binary systems: implications for observations with Pulsar Timing Arrays, MNRAS390, 192 (2008), arXiv:0804.4476 [astro-ph]

    2008

  36. [44]

    S. Chen, A. Sesana, and C. J. Conselice, Constraining as- trophysical observables of galaxy and supermassive black hole binary mergers using pulsar timing arrays, MNRAS 488, 401 (2019), arXiv:1810.04184 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019

  37. [45]

    Planck Collaborationet al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, A&A641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018

  38. [46]

    Daley and D

    D. Daley and D. Vere-Jones,An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Springer Series in Statistics (Springer New York, 2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    Middleton, W

    H. Middleton, W. Del Pozzo, W. M. Farr, A. Sesana, and A. Vecchio, Astrophysical constraints on massive black hole binary evolution from pulsar timing arrays, MNRAS 455, L72 (2016), arXiv:1507.00992 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016

  40. [48]

    Sato-Polito and M

    G. Sato-Polito and M. Kamionkowski, Exploring the spectrum of stochastic gravitational-wave anisotropies with pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D109, 123544 (2024), arXiv:2305.05690 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  41. [49]

    E. S. Phinney, A Practical Theorem on Gravitational Wave Backgrounds, arXiv e-prints , astro-ph/0108028 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108028 [astro-ph]

    2001

  42. [50]

    G. Agazieet al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Con- straints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background, ApJ952, L37 (2023), arXiv:2306.16220 [astro-ph.HE]. 9

    2023

  43. [51]

    van Haasteren and M

    R. van Haasteren and M. Vallisneri, New advances in the Gaussian-process approach to pulsar-timing data anal- ysis, Phys. Rev. D90, 104012 (2014), arXiv:1407.1838 [gr-qc]

    2014

  44. [52]

    J. A. Ellis, M. Vallisneri, S. R. Taylor, and P. T. Baker, Enterprise: Enhanced numerical toolbox enabling a ro- bust pulsar inference suite, Zenodo (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    J. P. W. Verbiest and G. M. Shaifullah, Measurement uncertainty in pulsar timing array experiments, Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 133001 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    J. S. Hazboun, J. D. Romano, and T. L. Smith, Realistic sensitivity curves for pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104028 (2019), arXiv:1907.04341 [gr-qc]

    2019

  47. [55]

    C. J. Moore, S. R. Taylor, and J. R. Gair, Estimating the sensitivity of pulsar timing arrays, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity32, 055004 (2015), arXiv:1406.5199 [astro- ph.IM]

    2015

  48. [56]

    Antoniadiset al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array

    J. Antoniadiset al., The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array. I. The dataset and tim- ing analysis, A&A678, A48 (2023), arXiv:2306.16224 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  49. [57]

    R. M. Shannonet al., The SKAO Pulsar Timing Ar- ray, The Open Journal of Astrophysics8, 54243 (2025), arXiv:2512.16163 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  50. [58]

    Janssenet al., Gravitational Wave Astronomy with the SKA, inAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14)(2015) p

    G. Janssenet al., Gravitational Wave Astronomy with the SKA, inAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14)(2015) p. 37, arXiv:1501.00127 [astro-ph.IM]

    2015

  51. [59]

    edu/research/parallax/, version used: March, 2025

    Shami Chatterjee,https://hosting.astro.cornell. edu/research/parallax/, version used: March, 2025

    2025

  52. [60]

    Raidal, J

    J. Raidal, J. Urrutia, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Ec- centricity effects on the supermassive black hole grav- itational wave background, A&A691, A212 (2024), arXiv:2406.05125 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  53. [61]

    Fastidio, E

    F. Fastidio, E. Bortolas, A. Gualandris, A. Sesana, J. I. Read, and W. Dehnen, Realistic consecutive galaxy mergers form eccentric pulsar timing array sources, A&A 703, A86 (2025), arXiv:2506.16539 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025

  54. [62]

    A. T. Delleret al., Microarcsecond VLBI Pulsar Astrom- etry with PSRπII. Parallax Distances for 57 Pulsars, ApJ 875, 100 (2019), arXiv:1808.09046 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019

  55. [63]

    Smits, S

    R. Smits, S. J. Tingay, N. Wex, M. Kramer, and B. Stappers, Prospects for accurate distance measure- ments of pulsars with the Square Kilometre Array: En- abling fundamental physics, A&A528, A108 (2011), arXiv:1101.5971 [astro-ph.IM]

    2011

  56. [64]

    Astropy Collaboration, The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package, ApJ935, 167 (2022), arXiv:2206.14220 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Foreman-Mackey, corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in python, The Journal of Open Source Software1, 24 (2016)

    D. Foreman-Mackey, corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in python, The Journal of Open Source Software1, 24 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Bradburyet al., JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018)

    J. Bradburyet al., JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    C. R. Harriset al., Array programming with NumPy, Nature585, 357 (2020)

    2020

  60. [68]

    Virtanenet al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nature Methods17, 261 (2020)

    P. Virtanenet al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Nature Methods17, 261 (2020). 10 log z = −0.33+0.50 −0.67 8.8 9.2 9.6 10.0 log Mc,r/M⊙ log Mc,r/M⊙ = 9 .45+0.36 −0.44 8 16 24 τc [kyr] τc [kyr] = 2 .77+6.07 −2.55 −8.25 −8.00 −7.75 −7.50 −...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed May 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.