arxiv: 2604.23163 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-25 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Assessing EMRI Detectability of the Rotating Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder Black Hole

Dan Zhang , Shulan Li , Guoyang Fu , Jian-Pin Wu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 07:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords EMRIquantum gravityOppenheimer-Snyder black holeLISAgravitational wave dephasingrotating black holeswaveform faithfulnessadiabatic approximation

0 comments

The pith

Quantum gravity corrections to rotating black holes produce detectable gravitational wave phase shifts in LISA, but spin suppresses the effect.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether a quantum correction parameter in the spacetime of a rotating black hole leaves measurable traces in the gravitational waves from an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral. By evolving orbits adiabatically and building augmented analytic kludge waveforms, the authors track how the quantum parameter alpha shifts the total phase accumulated over many orbits. They compare the match between waveforms that include or omit this correction across different spin values. The results indicate that LISA could register the quantum imprint for slowly rotating cases, yet faster rotation damps the signal. Accounting for spin therefore becomes essential when using such events to test quantum gravity models.

Core claim

For the rotating quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder black hole, the adiabatic evolution yields a cumulative gravitational-wave dephasing proportional to the quantum parameter alpha. Augmented analytic kludge waveforms constructed with and without alpha exhibit reduced faithfulness as alpha grows, yet this mismatch shrinks when the black-hole spin parameter a increases. Consequently, the quantum gravity effect produces imprints that LISA can in principle detect, while rotation weakens those signatures.

What carries the argument

Adiabatic orbital evolution that computes the total phase shift induced by the quantum correction alpha in the rotating quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder metric, evaluated through faithfulness comparisons of augmented analytic kludge waveforms for varying spin a.

If this is right

Quantum imprints remain above LISA's detection threshold for low-spin rotating quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder black holes.
Increasing the black-hole spin a reduces the waveform mismatch caused by alpha, narrowing the window for detection.
Accurate modeling of rotational effects is required to avoid systematic errors when constraining quantum gravity parameters from EMRI data.
The faithfulness between corrected and uncorrected waveforms decreases with larger alpha but recovers partially at higher a.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

LISA data-analysis pipelines will need joint templates that vary both spin and quantum parameters to extract reliable constraints.
Similar suppression by rotation may appear in other quantum-corrected black-hole spacetimes, suggesting a general pattern worth checking.
If the effect is confirmed, EMRI observations could place upper bounds on alpha once spin is marginalised over.
Non-adiabatic corrections near the last stable orbit might modify the dephasing for the highest-frequency signals.

Load-bearing premise

The adiabatic evolution approximation accurately captures the cumulative dephasing induced by the quantum parameter alpha without significant higher-order or non-adiabatic contributions.

What would settle it

A LISA observation of an EMRI around a black hole with independently measured spin a that shows no dephasing matching the predicted alpha dependence, or a faithfulness value inconsistent with the computed suppression by rotation, would falsify the detectability claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23163 by Dan Zhang, Guoyang Fu, Jian-Pin Wu, Shulan Li.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Phase diagram of the rotating qOs model in the parameter space of view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Dependence of the dephasing on the quantum parameter view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: The AAK waveform for the rotation qOS background with different view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Faithfulness between the with and without quantum gravity correction with varying view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This letter presents an assessment of quantum gravity effects on extreme-mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs) for the rotating quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder (qOS) black hole. Employing the adiabatic evolution, we compute the gravitational wave (GW) dephasing, which quantifies the cumulative phase shift induced by the quantum correction {\alpha} . We further generate the augmented analytic kludge (AAK) waveform and investigate the faithfulness between the waveforms with and without the quantum parameter {\alpha} for different values of a. Our results reveal that the quantum gravity effect induces detectable imprints in LISA, while the presence of rotation suppresses these signatures. This suggests that rotational degrees of freedom must be carefully accounted for when probing quantum gravity with EMRI observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper applies the usual adiabatic dephasing and AAK waveform tools to the rotating quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder metric and reports that the quantum parameter produces LISA-detectable shifts that weaken with increasing spin.

read the letter

The main point is straightforward: the authors take the rotating version of the quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder black hole, evolve EMRIs adiabatically, compute the accumulated dephasing from the quantum parameter alpha, and then check waveform faithfulness with the AAK model. They conclude the effect is visible to LISA but gets suppressed as the spin parameter a grows. That combination for this specific metric looks new, even if the individual pieces are standard. They correctly use an established waveform family and focus on a quantity (faithfulness) that directly addresses detectability, which is the right metric for the claim. The extension from non-rotating cases is a natural move and the suppression result is worth recording. The calculations follow the usual pipeline without obvious setup errors, and the metric itself is drawn from prior work rather than invented here. The soft spot is the adiabatic approximation itself. Over 10^5 cycles the quantum correction could in principle feed into post-adiabatic terms or shift resonance locations in ways the simple frequency map misses, and the paper does not appear to test that robustness explicitly. Without seeing the actual dephasing values, alpha ranges, or error estimates it is hard to judge how large the suppression really is or whether it survives modest changes in the evolution model. This is incremental work aimed at people who already follow EMRI modeling and quantum-gravity tests with LISA. Readers in that niche will get concrete numbers on how spin affects the signal, which is useful even if the central assumption needs a caveat. It is not a foundational result but it is the sort of targeted calculation that belongs in the literature. I would send it to peer review so the adiabatic step and the numerical faithfulness values can be checked by specialists.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper assesses EMRI detectability for the rotating quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder black hole by employing the adiabatic approximation to compute gravitational-wave dephasing induced by the quantum parameter α, generating augmented analytic kludge (AAK) waveforms, and evaluating faithfulness between α=0 and α>0 cases across different spin values a. The central claim is that quantum corrections produce LISA-detectable imprints that are suppressed by rotation.

Significance. If the adiabatic dephasing calculations prove robust, the work would usefully illustrate how a quantum-corrected rotating metric imprints on long EMRI signals and would underscore the need to include spin when searching for quantum-gravity signatures in LISA data. The use of standard AAK waveforms and faithfulness metrics provides a concrete, reproducible framework for such comparisons.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and waveform-generation section] The headline result—that α induces detectable dephasing while rotation suppresses it—rests entirely on the adiabatic evolution of orbital phase over ~10^5 cycles. The manuscript supplies no error estimate, resonance analysis, or comparison against post-adiabatic or self-force corrections that could arise from the α-dependent effective potential in the rotating qOS geometry. Without such validation, the reported faithfulness values and SNR thresholds cannot be taken as reliable.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract introduces the AAK waveform without citing the specific implementation or the underlying kludge parameters; a brief reference or footnote would clarify reproducibility.
[Throughout] Notation for the quantum parameter is given as both α and {α}; consistent use throughout the text would avoid minor confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting important considerations regarding the adiabatic approximation. Our point-by-point response follows.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and waveform-generation section] The headline result—that α induces detectable dephasing while rotation suppresses it—rests entirely on the adiabatic evolution of orbital phase over ~10^5 cycles. The manuscript supplies no error estimate, resonance analysis, or comparison against post-adiabatic or self-force corrections that could arise from the α-dependent effective potential in the rotating qOS geometry. Without such validation, the reported faithfulness values and SNR thresholds cannot be taken as reliable.

Authors: We concur that the adiabatic approximation forms the basis of our dephasing calculations and that additional validation would be beneficial. This approximation is standard in EMRI studies because it captures the dominant secular phase evolution over the large number of cycles relevant to LISA observations. The quantum correction α is included in the effective potential and thus affects the orbital frequencies consistently within the same framework for both the reference and modified cases. Consequently, the relative dephasing and the resulting faithfulness metric provide a meaningful first indication of detectability. Nevertheless, the manuscript does not contain explicit error bounds or post-adiabatic comparisons. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the waveform-generation section discussing the limitations of the adiabatic approach, citing key references on its accuracy for EMRIs, and stating that a full self-force treatment of the α-dependent geometry remains an important direction for future work. We will also note that no resonant orbits were encountered in the explored parameter range. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Quantitative error estimates for the adiabatic dephasing and direct comparisons to post-adiabatic or self-force results in the rotating qOS spacetime.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses external metric and standard adiabatic/AAK tools without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper takes the rotating qOS metric (with parameter alpha) as an input from prior literature, applies the standard adiabatic approximation to integrate geodesic frequencies and accumulate dephasing Delta Phi over the inspiral, then feeds the resulting phase into the pre-existing AAK waveform model to compute faithfulness and SNR. None of these steps renames a fit as a prediction, defines a quantity in terms of itself, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose validity is internal to the present work. The claim that rotation suppresses alpha-induced imprints is a direct numerical output of the external models, not a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central claim rests on the validity of the rotating qOS metric, the adiabatic approximation for EMRIs, and the faithfulness metric as a proxy for detectability; alpha and spin parameter a are varied but not fitted in the abstract.

free parameters (2)

alpha
Quantum correction parameter whose effect on dephasing is quantified.
a
Black hole spin parameter varied to demonstrate suppression of quantum signatures.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Adiabatic evolution accurately describes the inspiral phase evolution
Invoked to compute gravitational wave dephasing.

invented entities (1)

rotating quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder black hole no independent evidence
purpose: Spacetime model incorporating both rotation and quantum gravity correction
Metric used as the background for waveform calculations; independent evidence not provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5427 in / 1279 out tokens · 48167 ms · 2026-05-08T07:47:52.828863+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Constraining Lorentz symmetry breaking in bumblebee gravity with extreme mass-ratio inspirals
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Extreme mass-ratio inspirals can constrain the Lorentz symmetry breaking parameter ℓ in bumblebee gravity to O(10^{-4}) uncertainty with LISA.
Constraining Lorentz symmetry breaking in bumblebee gravity with extreme mass-ratio inspirals
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

EMRI waveforms in bumblebee gravity allow LISA to constrain the Lorentz symmetry breaking parameter ell at the level of O(10^{-4}).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Penrose,Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities, Phys

R. Penrose,Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities, Phys. Rev. Lett.14(1965) 57–59

1965
[2]

S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose,The Singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A314(1970) 529–548

1970
[3]

Loop Quantum Gravity

C. Rovelli,Loop quantum gravity, Living Rev. Rel.1(1998) 1, [gr-qc/9710008]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[4]

Thiemann,Lectures on loop quantum gravity, Lect

T. Thiemann,Lectures on loop quantum gravity, Lect. Notes Phys.631(2003) 41–135, [gr-qc/0210094]

work page arXiv 2003
[5]

Ashtekar and J

A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski,Background independent quantum gravity: A Status report, Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004) R53, [gr-qc/0404018]

work page arXiv 2004
[6]

M. Han, W. Huang, and Y. Ma,Fundamental structure of loop quantum gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D16(2007) 1397–1474, [gr-qc/0509064]

work page arXiv 2007
[7]

Bojowald, ”Absence of singularity in loop quantum co smology”, Phys

M. Bojowald,Absence of singularity in loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 5227–5230, [gr-qc/0102069]

work page arXiv 2001
[8]

Quantum Nature of the Big Bang

A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh,Quantum nature of the big bang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(2006) 141301, [gr-qc/0602086]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[9]

Ashtekar,Introduction to loop quantum gravity and cosmology, Lect

A. Ashtekar,Introduction to loop quantum gravity and cosmology, Lect. Notes Phys.863 (2013) 31–56, [arXiv:1201.4598]

work page arXiv 2013
[10]

Peltola and G

A. Peltola and G. Kunstatter,A Complete, Single-Horizon Quantum Corrected Black Hole Spacetime, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 061501, [arXiv:0811.3240]

work page arXiv 2009
[11]

Peltola and G

A. Peltola and G. Kunstatter,Effective Polymer Dynamics of D-Dimensional Black Hole Interiors, Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 044031, [arXiv:0902.1746]

work page arXiv 2009
[12]

Modesto,Semiclassical loop quantum black hole, Int

L. Modesto,Semiclassical loop quantum black hole, Int. J. Theor. Phys.49(2010) 1649–1683, [arXiv:0811.2196]. 10

work page arXiv 2010
[13]

Quantum Transfiguration of Kruskal Black Holes

A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh,Quantum Transfiguration of Kruskal Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 24 241301, [arXiv:1806.00648]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[14]

Ashtekar, J

A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh,Quantum extension of the Kruskal spacetime, Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 12 126003, [arXiv:1806.02406]

work page arXiv 2018
[15]

Gambini, J

R. Gambini, J. Olmedo, and J. Pullin,Spherically symmetric loop quantum gravity: analysis of improved dynamics, Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020), no. 20 205012, [arXiv:2006.01513]

work page arXiv 2020
[16]

Bodendorfer, F

N. Bodendorfer, F. M. Mele, and J. M¨ unch,Effective Quantum Extended Spacetime of Polymer Schwarzschild Black Hole, Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 19 195015, [arXiv:1902.04542]

work page arXiv 2019
[17]

Bodendorfer, F

N. Bodendorfer, F. M. Mele, and J. M¨ unch,(b,v)-type variables for black to white hole transitions in effective loop quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B819(2021) 136390, [arXiv:1911.12646]

work page arXiv 2021
[18]

J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing,Effective loop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 10 106024, [arXiv:2006.09302]

work page arXiv 2020
[19]

Parvizi, T

A. Parvizi, T. Paw lowski, Y. Tavakoli, and J. Lewandowski,Rainbow black hole from quantum gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 8 086002, [arXiv:2110.03069]

work page arXiv 2022
[20]

Lewandowski, Y

J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, J. Yang, and C. Zhang,Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder and Swiss Cheese Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 10 101501, [arXiv:2210.02253]

work page arXiv 2023
[21]

Giesel, M

K. Giesel, M. Han, B.-F. Li, H. Liu, and P. Singh,Spherical symmetric gravitational collapse of a dust cloud: Polymerized dynamics in reduced phase space, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 4 044047, [arXiv:2212.01930]

work page arXiv 2023
[22]

Alonso-Bardaji, D

A. Alonso-Bardaji, D. Brizuela, and R. Vera,An effective model for the quantum Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Lett. B829(2022) 137075, [arXiv:2112.12110]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Alonso-Bardaji, D

A. Alonso-Bardaji, D. Brizuela, and R. Vera,Nonsingular spherically symmetric black-hole model with holonomy corrections, Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 2 024035, [arXiv:2205.02098]

work page arXiv 2022
[24]

Zhang, J

C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, and J. Yang,Black Holes and Covariance in Effective Quantum Gravity,arXiv:2407.10168

work page arXiv
[25]

E. T. Newman and A. I. Janis,Note on the Kerr spinning particle metric, 1965

1965
[26]

Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification

M. Azreg-A¨ ınou,Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification, 11 Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 6 064041, [arXiv:1405.2569]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[27]

Azreg-A¨ ınou,From static to rotating to conformal static solutions: Rotating imperfect fluid wormholes with(out) electric or magnetic field, Eur

M. Azreg-A¨ ınou,From static to rotating to conformal static solutions: Rotating imperfect fluid wormholes with(out) electric or magnetic field, Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014), no. 5 2865, [arXiv:1401.4292]

work page arXiv 2014
[28]

Caravelli and L

F. Caravelli and L. Modesto,Spinning Loop Black Holes, Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 245022, [arXiv:1006.0232]

work page arXiv 2010
[29]

C. Liu, T. Zhu, Q. Wu, K. Jusufi, M. Jamil, M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, and A. Wang,Shadow and quasinormal modes of a rotating loop quantum black hole, Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 8 084001, [arXiv:2003.00477]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 103, 089902 (2021)]

work page arXiv 2020
[30]

Brahma, C.-Y

S. Brahma, C.-Y. Chen, and D.-h. Yeom,Testing Loop Quantum Gravity from Observational Consequences of Nonsingular Rotating Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021), no. 18 181301, [arXiv:2012.08785]

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

Chen,On the possible spacetime structures of rotating loop quantum black holes, Int

C.-Y. Chen,On the possible spacetime structures of rotating loop quantum black holes, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.19(2022), no. 11 2250176, [arXiv:2207.03797]

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

Kumar, S

J. Kumar, S. U. Islam, and S. G. Ghosh,Loop Quantum Gravity motivated multihorizon rotating black holes, JCAP11(2022) 032, [arXiv:2209.13562]

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

Huang and Z

Y. Huang and Z. Cao,Finite-distance gravitational deflection of massive particles by a rotating black hole in loop quantum gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023), no. 1 80, [arXiv:2212.04254]

work page arXiv 2023
[34]

Fazzini,Effective Kerr geometry from loop quantum gravity, Phys

F. Fazzini,Effective Kerr geometry from loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 4 046025, [arXiv:2409.17099]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

H. Ali, S. U. Islam, and S. G. Ghosh,Shadows and parameter estimation of rotating quantum corrected black holes and constraints from EHT observation of M87* and Sgr A*, JHEAp47(2025) 100367, [arXiv:2410.09198]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Z. Ban, J. Chen, and J. Yang,Shadows of rotating black holes in effective quantum gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 8 878, [arXiv:2411.09374]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Vachher and S

A. Vachher and S. G. Ghosh,Strong gravitational lensing by rotating quantum-corrected black holes: Insights and constraints from EHT observations of M87* and Sgr A*, JHEAp 45(2025) 75–86, [arXiv:2410.11332]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

M. A. Raza, M. Zubair, F. Atamurotov, and A. Abdujabbarov,Influence of quantum correction on Kerr black hole in effective loop quantum gravity via shadows and EHT results, 12 Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 9 973, [arXiv:2501.01308]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

Fatima and G

U. Fatima and G. Abbas,Penrose process in rotating black holes with quantum corrections: implications for energy extraction and irreducible mass, Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026), no. 2 166, [arXiv:2508.01683]

work page arXiv 2026
[40]

The quasinormal modes of the rotating quantum corrected black holes

J.-N. Chen, Z.-K. Guo, and L.-B. Wu,The quasinormal modes of the rotating quantum corrected black holes,arXiv:2510.27320. [41]LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,GW150914: The Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of First Discoveries, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016), no. 13 131103, [arXiv:1602.03838]. [42]LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[41]

Y. Gong, J. Luo, and B. Wang,Concepts and status of Chinese space gravitational wave detection projects, Nature Astron.5(2021), no. 9 881–889, [arXiv:2109.07442]

work page arXiv 2021
[42]

Hu and Y.-L

W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu,The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev.4(2017), no. 5 685–686

2017
[43]

Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein,Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 10 103012, [arXiv:1703.09722]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[44]

J. R. Gair, L. Barack, T. Creighton, C. Cutler, S. L. Larson, E. S. Phinney, and M. Vallisneri,Event rate estimates for LISA extreme mass ratio capture sources, Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004) S1595–S1606, [gr-qc/0405137]

work page arXiv 2004
[45]

Mapelli, E

M. Mapelli, E. Ripamonti, A. Vecchio, A. W. Graham, and A. Gualandris,A cosmological view of extreme mass-ratio inspirals in nuclear star clusters, Astron. Astrophys.542(2012) A102, [arXiv:1205.2702]

work page arXiv 2012
[46]

Amaro-Seoane, J

P. Amaro-Seoane, J. R. Gair, M. Freitag, M. Coleman Miller, I. Mandel, C. J. Cutler, and S. Babak,Astrophysics, detection and science applications of intermediate- and extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) R113–R169, [astro-ph/0703495]

work page arXiv 2007
[47]

Using LISA EMRI sources to test off-Kerr deviations in the geometry of massive black holes

L. Barack and C. Cutler,Using LISA EMRI sources to test off-Kerr deviations in the geometry of massive black holes, Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 042003, [gr-qc/0612029]

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[48]

G. Fu, Y. Liu, B. Wang, J.-P. Wu, and C. Zhang,Probing quantum gravity effects with eccentric extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 8 084066, [arXiv:2409.08138]

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Zi and S

T. Zi and S. Kumar,Eccentric extreme mass-ratio inspirals: a gateway to probe quantum gravity effects, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 5 592, [arXiv:2409.17765]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Liu and X

Y. Liu and X. Zhang,Gravitational waves for eccentric extreme mass ratio inspirals of self-dual spacetime, JCAP10(2024) 056, [arXiv:2404.08454]

work page arXiv 2024
[51]

Yang, Y.-P

S. Yang, Y.-P. Zhang, L. Zhao, and Y.-X. Liu,Constraints on quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder black holes with eccentric extreme mass-ratio inspirals,arXiv:2509.24835

work page arXiv
[52]

Ahmed, Q

F. Ahmed, Q. Wu, S. G. Ghosh, and T. Zhu,Signatures of Quantum-Corrected Black Holes in Gravitational Waves from Periodic Orbits,arXiv:2512.24036. 14

work page arXiv
[53]

H. Gong, S. Long, X.-J. Wang, Z. Xia, J.-P. Wu, and Q. Pan,Gravitational waveforms from periodic orbits around a novel regular black hole,arXiv:2509.23318

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[54]

R.-T. Chen, G. Fu, D. Zhang, and J.-P. Wu,Imprints of quantum gravity effects on gravitational waves: a comparative study using extreme mass-ratio inspirals, arXiv:2601.00185

work page arXiv
[55]

Zhang, C

D. Zhang, C. Zhang, Q. Pan, G. Fu, and J.-P. Wu,Probing Quantum Gravity effects with Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals around Rotating Hayward Black Holes,arXiv:2602.07436

work page arXiv
[56]

A. J. K. Chua, M. L. Katz, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes,Rapid generation of fully relativistic extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveform templates for LISA data analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021), no. 5 051102, [arXiv:2008.06071]

work page arXiv 2021
[57]

M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes,Fast extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational-wave data analysis, Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 6 064047, [arXiv:2104.04582]

work page arXiv 2021
[58]

K. S. Thorne,Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys.52(1980) 299–339

1980
[59]

F. D. Ryan,Effect of gravitational radiation reaction on circular orbits around a spinning black hole, Phys. Rev. D52(1995) R3159–R3162, [gr-qc/9506023]

work page Pith review arXiv 1995
[60]

P. C. Peters and J. Mathews,Gravitational radiation from point masses in a Keplerian orbit, Phys. Rev.131(1963) 435–439

1963
[61]

Cutler, D

C. Cutler, D. Kennefick, and E. Poisson,Gravitational radiation reaction for bound motion around a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 3816–3835

1994
[62]

Glampedakis and D

K. Glampedakis and D. Kennefick,Zoom and whirl: Eccentric equatorial orbits around spinning black holes and their evolution under gravitational radiation reaction, Phys. Rev. D 66(2002) 044002, [gr-qc/0203086]

work page arXiv 2002
[63]

Gupta, B

P. Gupta, B. Bonga, A. J. K. Chua, and T. Tanaka,Importance of tidal resonances in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 4 044056, [arXiv:2104.03422]

work page arXiv 2021
[64]

Bonga, H

B. Bonga, H. Yang, and S. A. Hughes,Tidal resonance in extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 10 101103, [arXiv:1905.00030]

work page arXiv 2019
[65]

A. J. K. Chua, C. J. Moore, and J. R. Gair,Augmented kludge waveforms for detecting extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D96(2017), no. 4 044005, [arXiv:1705.04259]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[66]

Barack and C

L. Barack and C. Cutler,Lisa capture sources: Approximate waveforms, signal-to-noise 15 ratios, and parameter estimation accuracy, Phys. Rev. D69(Apr, 2004) 082005

2004
[67]

A. J. K. Chua and J. R. Gair,Improved analytic extreme-mass-ratio inspiral model for scoping out eLISA data analysis, Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 232002, [arXiv:1510.06245]

work page arXiv 2015
[68]

The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves

T. Robson, N. J. Cornish, and C. Liu,The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves, Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 10 105011, [arXiv:1803.01944]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[69]

Constructing Gravitational Waves from Generic Spin-Precessing Compact Binary Inspirals

K. Chatziioannou, A. Klein, N. Yunes, and N. Cornish,Constructing Gravitational Waves from Generic Spin-Precessing Compact Binary Inspirals, Phys. Rev. D95(2017), no. 10 104004, [arXiv:1703.03967]. 16

work page Pith review arXiv 2017