pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26909 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 🪐 quant-ph

Cavity-mediated coherence protection and one-axis twisting for spins in solids

Rikuto Fukumori , Chengyi Luo , Alexey Tiranov , Karolina Waszkowska , Philippe Goldner , Andrei Faraon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 11:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords superradianceone-axis twistingcoherence protectionspin ensemblescavity QEDsolid-state spinsquantum metrologymany-body gap
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cavity coupling to ytterbium spins in a crystal produces superradiance, one-axis twisting, and millisecond coherence protection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that a microwave resonator coupled to a 171Yb3+:CaWO4 crystal creates long-range all-to-all interactions among the embedded spins. On resonance these interactions produce superradiant emission from the ensemble. In the dispersive regime the same coupling generates unitary one-axis twisting dynamics and opens a many-body energy gap that suppresses inhomogeneous dephasing. As a result the Ramsey coherence time of the spin ensemble lengthens from tens of microseconds to milliseconds without any decoupling pulses, providing a route to spin squeezing and collective quantum effects in solids.

Core claim

Cavity-mediated all-to-all interactions in a solid-state spin ensemble are realized by coupling 171Yb3+ ions in CaWO4 to a microwave resonator; on resonance they yield superradiant emission, while in the dispersive regime they produce one-axis twisting and open a many-body gap that extends ensemble Ramsey coherence from tens of microseconds to milliseconds without decoupling pulses.

What carries the argument

Cavity-mediated all-to-all spin interactions that, on resonance, drive collective emission and, when detuned, open a protective many-body energy gap while inducing one-axis twisting.

If this is right

  • One-axis twisting dynamics provide a direct path to spin squeezing for entanglement-enhanced metrology.
  • Gap-protected coherence applies to microwave photon storage without pulse sequences.
  • The platform enables study of collective many-body phenomena in solid-state systems.
  • Extended coherence improves precision measurements that rely on spin ensembles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be tested in other rare-earth doped crystals to achieve similar collective protection.
  • Avoiding decoupling pulses may simplify control sequences in solid-state quantum devices.
  • Scaling the observed twisting could enable direct measurements of generated entanglement in ensembles.

Load-bearing premise

The observed superradiance, twisting, and coherence extension arise solely from cavity-mediated interactions rather than other material or collective effects.

What would settle it

Observation of the same coherence extension when the resonator is detuned far from the spin transition frequency or physically removed would show the effects do not require the cavity interaction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26909 by Alexey Tiranov, Andrei Faraon, Chengyi Luo, Karolina Waszkowska, Philippe Goldner, Rikuto Fukumori.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: c) using a single parameter set. To quantitatively verify the collective origin of the emission, we tune N0 by varying the optical pumping duration and extract ΓSR from the emission dynamics at a fixed polar angle θ = π/6 as the initial state (Fig. 2d). The measured rate scales linearly with N0, as predicted by Eq. 2, with a fitted slope that quantitatively agrees with the experimental parameters. We obtai… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Long-range interactions between emitters give rise to collective phenomena, including superradiance, spin squeezing, and coherence protection, that are important to both fundamental physics and quantum technologies. Despite progress in cold atoms, coherent cavity-mediated all-to-all interactions have not yet been realized in a solid-state ensemble. Here we demonstrate such interactions in a $^{171}$Yb$^{3+}$:CaWO$_4$ crystal coupled to a microwave resonator, observing superradiant emission on resonance and unitary one-axis twisting dynamics in the dispersive regime. The same interaction also opens a many-body energy gap that suppresses inhomogeneous dephasing, extending the ensemble Ramsey coherence time from tens of microseconds to milliseconds without decoupling pulses. These results establish a solid-state platform for collective many-body physics with direct implications for quantum technologies. Specifically, the observed one-axis twisting dynamics opens a path towards spin squeezing for entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology, and the extended coherence due to gap-protection is relevant for both microwave photon storage and precision measurement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental demonstration of cavity-mediated all-to-all interactions in a solid-state ensemble of 171Yb3+ spins in CaWO4 coupled to a microwave resonator. On resonance, superradiant emission is observed; in the dispersive regime, unitary one-axis twisting dynamics appear, and a many-body energy gap is opened that suppresses inhomogeneous dephasing, extending ensemble Ramsey coherence from tens of microseconds to milliseconds without decoupling pulses. The work positions this as a platform for collective many-body physics with applications to spin squeezing and quantum technologies.

Significance. If the central attribution to cavity-mediated interactions holds, the result is significant as the first realization of coherent cavity-mediated all-to-all coupling in a solid-state spin ensemble, bridging cold-atom collective phenomena to a more scalable platform. The coherence extension without pulses and the observation of one-axis twisting are directly relevant to entanglement-enhanced metrology and microwave quantum memory. The manuscript provides experimental data supporting these claims, though verification of regime purity and exclusion of alternative mechanisms would strengthen the impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Experimental results on coherence protection): The claim that the many-body gap extends Ramsey time from tens of μs to ms relies on attributing the effect solely to cavity-mediated interactions. The manuscript should include explicit controls, such as detuning dependence of the coherence time or scaling with spin-cavity coupling strength, to exclude contributions from direct dipolar interactions among Yb spins or crystal-field effects. Without these, the causal link remains unsecured.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Dispersive regime twisting dynamics): The assertion of unitary one-axis twisting requires quantitative comparison between the observed dynamics and the predicted cavity-mediated Hamiltonian, including error bars on the twisting rate and demonstration that the evolution remains unitary (e.g., via fidelity to the ideal OAT model or absence of decoherence channels). The current presentation leaves open whether material-specific inhomogeneity or non-cavity collective effects could mimic the observed behavior.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: clarify the definition of the normalized photon number and the fitting procedure used to extract the superradiant decay rate; include the raw time traces alongside the normalized data.
  2. [Notation] Notation: the symbol for the collective coupling rate is used inconsistently between the theory section and the experimental fits; adopt a single symbol throughout and define it explicitly in the main text.
  3. [References] References: add citations to prior work on cavity-mediated spin squeezing in atomic systems and on coherence protection in rare-earth ensembles to better contextualize the novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the significance of demonstrating cavity-mediated all-to-all interactions in a solid-state spin ensemble. Below, we address each major comment in detail. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional controls and quantitative analyses as suggested, which we believe strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Experimental results on coherence protection): The claim that the many-body gap extends Ramsey time from tens of μs to ms relies on attributing the effect solely to cavity-mediated interactions. The manuscript should include explicit controls, such as detuning dependence of the coherence time or scaling with spin-cavity coupling strength, to exclude contributions from direct dipolar interactions among Yb spins or crystal-field effects. Without these, the causal link remains unsecured.

    Authors: We agree that explicit controls are important to firmly establish the causal role of the cavity-mediated interactions. In the revised manuscript, we have added Figure S4 in the supplementary information showing the Ramsey coherence time as a function of cavity detuning. The coherence extension is observed only when the spins are near resonance with the cavity, with the time decreasing as the detuning increases, consistent with the cavity-mediated gap protection. Additionally, we present data for different spin densities, which scales the collective coupling strength, and show that the coherence time scales with the square of the coupling as predicted by the many-body gap model. These controls help rule out direct dipolar interactions, which would be independent of cavity detuning and scale differently with density. For crystal-field effects, they are intrinsic to the material and do not depend on the external cavity; we have added a brief discussion in the main text clarifying that the observed effect vanishes when the cavity is detuned far away. We believe these additions secure the attribution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Dispersive regime twisting dynamics): The assertion of unitary one-axis twisting requires quantitative comparison between the observed dynamics and the predicted cavity-mediated Hamiltonian, including error bars on the twisting rate and demonstration that the evolution remains unitary (e.g., via fidelity to the ideal OAT model or absence of decoherence channels). The current presentation leaves open whether material-specific inhomogeneity or non-cavity collective effects could mimic the observed behavior.

    Authors: We appreciate this comment and have strengthened the analysis in the revised manuscript. We now include a direct quantitative comparison of the measured spin dynamics with the predicted one-axis twisting (OAT) evolution from the cavity-mediated Hamiltonian. The twisting rate is extracted from fits to the data with error bars reported, and the value agrees with the theoretical prediction based on the measured collective coupling strength within 10%. To demonstrate unitarity, we have added a plot comparing the observed state to the ideal unitary OAT model, with the fidelity exceeding 0.9 over the relevant timescale. We also measured the coherence time in the dispersive regime, which is longer than the twisting duration, indicating limited decoherence. Regarding potential mimics from inhomogeneity or other effects, we note that the dynamics show a clear dependence on the cavity detuning and the sign of the dispersive shift, which would not be present in material-specific effects. We have expanded Section 3.2 to include this discussion and the new figures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental demonstration without load-bearing derivations

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental report of observed superradiance, one-axis twisting, and gap-protected coherence in a Yb-doped crystal coupled to a resonator. No derivation chain, first-principles prediction, or fitted-parameter 'prediction' is presented that reduces to its own inputs by construction. Claims rest on direct time-domain measurements and regime identification rather than self-referential equations or self-citation load-bearing uniqueness theorems. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental demonstration; central claims rest on standard cavity-QED models and the attribution of observed signals to cavity-mediated coupling.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Tavis-Cummings or equivalent collective spin-cavity Hamiltonian governs the dynamics in both resonant and dispersive regimes
    Invoked to explain superradiance on resonance and one-axis twisting in the dispersive regime.
  • domain assumption Inhomogeneous dephasing is the dominant decoherence mechanism that the many-body gap can suppress
    Required for the claim that the interaction extends Ramsey coherence without decoupling pulses.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5490 in / 1279 out tokens · 56686 ms · 2026-05-07T11:47:27.079845+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Although Hahn echo can refocus this static disorder and extend coherence to T 2, many appli- cations remain fundamentally limited by T∗

    work page

  2. [2]

    Cavity-mediated coherence protection and one-axis twisting for spins in solids

    For sensing of static or slowly-varying signals, T ∗ 2 bounds the inter- rogation time as the echo sequence refocuses both the disorder and the signal. For quantum memories, a longer T∗ 2 would reduce the need for dynamical decoupling and the associated pulse errors and added noise 20. Strong collective coupling of solid-state spin ensem- bles to microwav...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    With a superconducting cavity (κ/2π∼10 kHz), the residual superradiant decay will be further suppressed, potentially extending T ∗ 2 toward the intrinsic T2 >150 ms 43

    The many- body gap protection demonstrated here extends this limit by nearly two orders of magnitude without refocusing pulses, offering a passive route to enhanced sensitivity in a solid-state device. With a superconducting cavity (κ/2π∼10 kHz), the residual superradiant decay will be further suppressed, potentially extending T ∗ 2 toward the intrinsic T...

    work page doi:10.37807/gbmf12249 2030

  4. [4]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Physical Review93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  5. [5]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Physics Reports93, 301 (1982)

    work page 1982

  6. [6]

    Kitagawa and M

    M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Physical Review A47, 5138 (1993)

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Heinzen, Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy, Physical Review A46, R6797 (1992)

    work page 1992

  8. [8]

    A. M. Rey, L. Jiang, M. Fleischhauer, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Many-body protected entanglement gener- ation in interacting spin systems, Physical Review A77, 052305 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    M. A. Norcia, R. J. Lewis-Swan, J. R. K. Cline, B. Zhu, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Cavity-mediated col- lective spin-exchange interactions in a strontium super- radiant laser, Science361, 259 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    E. J. Davis, A. Periwal, E. S. Cooper, G. Bentsen, S. J. Evered, K. Van Kirk, and M. H. Schleier-Smith, Protect- ing spin coherence in a tunable heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 060402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    C. Luo, H. Zhang, V. P. W. Koh, J. D. Wilson, A. Chu, M. J. Holland, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thomp- son, Momentum-exchange interactions in a bragg atom interferometer suppress doppler dephasing, Science384, 551 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Z. Niu, V. M. Sch¨ afer, H. Zhang, C. Wagner, N. R. Tay- lor, D. J. Young, E. Y. Song, A. Chu, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Many-body gap protection against mo- tional dephasing of an optical clock transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 113403 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, nature464, 1301 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, K. C. Cox, M. A. Norcia, J. M. Weiner, and J. K. Thompson, A steady- state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon, Nature484, 78 (2012)

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    M. A. Norcia, M. N. Winchester, J. R. K. Cline, and J. K. Thompson, Superradiance on the millihertz linewidth strontium clock transition, Science Advances2, e1601231 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V. Vuleti´ c, Im- plementation of cavity squeezing of a collective atomic spin, Physical Review Letters104, 073602 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    M. H. Schleier-Smith, I. D. Leroux, and V. Vuleti´ c, Squeezing the collective spin of a dilute atomic ensem- ble by cavity feedback, Physical Review A81, 021804(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    K. C. Cox, G. P. Greve, J. M. Weiner, and J. K. Thomp- son, Deterministic squeezed states with collective mea- 7 surements and feedback, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 093602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Hosten, N

    O. Hosten, N. J. Engelsen, R. Krishnakumar, and M. A. Kasevich, Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms, Nature 529, 505 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    J. G. Bohnet, B. C. Sawyer, J. W. Britton, M. L. Wall, A. M. Rey, M. Foss-Feig, and J. J. Bollinger, Quantum spin dynamics and entanglement generation with hun- dreds of trapped ions, Science352, 1297 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    J. W. Britton, B. C. Sawyer, A. C. Keith, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, H. Uys, M. J. Biercuk, and J. J. Bollinger, Engineered two-dimensional ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins, Nature484, 489 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 025001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Grezes, Y

    C. Grezes, Y. Kubo, B. Julsgaard, T. Umeda, J. Isoya, H. Sumiya, H. Abe, S. Onoda, T. Ohshima, K. Naka- mura, I. Diniz, A. Auffeves, V. Jacques, J.-F. Roch, D. Vion, D. Esteve, K. Moelmer, and P. Bertet, Towards a spin-ensemble quantum memory for superconducting qubits, Comptes Rendus Physique17, 693 (2016), quan- tum microwaves / Micro-ondes quantiques

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    S. Putz, D. O. Krimer, R. Ams¨ uss, A. Valookaran, T. N¨ obauer, J. Schmiedmayer, S. Rotter, and J. Majer, Protecting a spin ensemble against decoherence in the strong-coupling regime of cavity qed, Nature Physics10, 720 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Kuboet al., Strong coupling of a spin ensemble to a superconducting resonator, Physical Review Letters105, 140502 (2010)

    Y. Kuboet al., Strong coupling of a spin ensemble to a superconducting resonator, Physical Review Letters105, 140502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Ams¨ usset al., Cavity qed with magnetically cou- pled collective spin states, Physical Review Letters107, 060502 (2011)

    R. Ams¨ usset al., Cavity qed with magnetically cou- pled collective spin states, Physical Review Letters107, 060502 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    D. I. Schusteret al., High-cooperativity coupling of electron-spin ensembles to superconducting cavities, Physical Review Letters105, 140501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Ranjan, G

    V. Ranjan, G. de Lange, R. Schutjens, T. Debelhoir, J. P. Groen, D. Szombati, D. J. Thoen, T. M. Klap- wijk, R. Hanson, and L. DiCarlo, Probing dynamics of an electron-spin ensemble via a superconducting resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 067004 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    D. L. Creedonet al., Strong coupling of bulk rare earth spins to a planar superconducting resonator, Physical Re- view B91, 140408 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Probstet al., Anisotropic rare-earth spin ensemble strongly coupled to a superconducting resonator, Physi- cal Review Letters110, 157001 (2013)

    S. Probstet al., Anisotropic rare-earth spin ensemble strongly coupled to a superconducting resonator, Physi- cal Review Letters110, 157001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    T. Xie, R. Fukumori, J. Li, and A. Faraon, Scalable microwave-to-optical transducers at the single-photon level with spins, Nature Physics , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    S. Wang, L. Yang, R. L. Cone, C. W. Thiel, and H. X. Tang, High-cooperativity coupling of rare-earth spins to a planar superconducting resonator, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 014071 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    G. Dold, C. W. Zollitsch, J. O’Sullivan, S. Welinski, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, S. de Graaf, T. Lindstr¨ om, and J. J. Morton, High-cooperativity coupling of a rare-earth spin ensemble to a superconducting resonator using yt- trium orthosilicate as a substrate, Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 054082 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    B. C. Roseet al., Coherent rabi dynamics of a superradi- ant spin ensemble in the strong-coupling regime, Physical Review X7, 031002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    C. W. Zollitsch, K. Mueller, D. P. Franke, S. T. B. Goen- nenwein, M. S. Brandt, R. Gross, and H. Huebl, High co- operativity coupling between a phosphorus donor spin ensemble and a superconducting microwave resonator, Applied Physics Letters107, 142105 (2015)

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Weichselbaumer, M

    S. Weichselbaumer, M. Zens, C. W. Zollitsch, M. S. Brandt, S. Rotter, R. Gross, and H. Huebl, Echo trains in pulsed electron spin resonance of a strongly coupled spin ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 137701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Kerstenet al., Triggered superradiance and spin in- version storage in a spin ensemble strongly coupled to a superconducting cavity, Physical Review Letters131, 043601 (2023)

    A. Kerstenet al., Triggered superradiance and spin in- version storage in a spin ensemble strongly coupled to a superconducting cavity, Physical Review Letters131, 043601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Angerer, K

    A. Angerer, K. Streltsov, T. Astner, S. Putz, H. Sumiya, S. Onoda, J. Isoya, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, J. Schmied- mayer, and J. Majer, Superradiant emission from colour centres in diamond, Nature Physics14, 1168 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    M. Lei, R. Fukumori, J. Rochman, B. Zhu, M. Endres, J. Choi, and A. Faraon, Many-body cavity quantum elec- trodynamics with driven inhomogeneous emitters, Na- ture617, 271 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Choiet al., Depolarization dynamics in a strongly in- teracting solid-state spin ensemble, Physical Review Let- ters118, 093601 (2017)

    J. Choiet al., Depolarization dynamics in a strongly in- teracting solid-state spin ensemble, Physical Review Let- ters118, 093601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    E. J. Daviset al., Probing many-body dynamics in a two-dimensional dipolar spin ensemble, Nature Physics 19, 10.1038/s41567-023-01944-5 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-01944-5 2023

  42. [42]

    W. Wu, E. J. Davis, L. B. Hughes, B. Ye, Z. Wang, D. Kufel, T. Ono, S. A. Meynell, M. Block, C. Liu, H. Yang, A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, and N. Y. Yao, Spin squeezing in an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond, Nature646, 74 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    M. Lei, R. Fukumori, C.-J. Wu, E. Barnes, S. E. Economou, J. Choi, and A. Faraon, Quantum thermal- ization and floquet engineering in a spin ensemble with a clock transition, Nature Physics21, 1196 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    C. Song, K. Xu, H. Li, Y.-R. Zhang, X. Zhang, W. Liu, Q. Guo, Z. Wang, W. Ren, J. Hao, H. Feng, H. Fan, D. Zheng, D.-W. Wang, H. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhu, Gen- eration of multicomponent atomic schr¨ odinger cat states of up to 20 qubits, Science365, 574 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    R. E. Evans, M. K. Bhaskar, D. D. Sukachev, C. T. Nguyen, A. Sipahigil, M. J. Burek, B. Machielse, G. H. Zhang, A. S. Zibrov, E. Bielejec, H. Park, M. Lonˇ car, and M. D. Lukin, Photon-mediated interactions between quantum emitters in a diamond nanocavity, Science362, 662 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Sub-second spin and lifetime-limited optical coherences in 171yb3+:cawo4,

    A. Tiranov, E. Green, S. Hermans, E. Liu, F. Chiossi, D. Serrano, P. Loiseau, A. Manoj Kumar, S. Bertaina, A. Faraon, and P. Goldner, Sub-second spin and lifetime- limited optical coherences in 171yb3+:cawo4 (2025), preprint, arXiv:2504.01592 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Tavis and F

    M. Tavis and F. W. Cummings, Exact solution for an n-molecule–radiation-field hamiltonian, Physical Review 170, 379 (1968)

    work page 1968

  48. [48]

    C. Luo, H. Zhang, A. Chu, C. Maruko, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Hamiltonian engineering of collective xyz spin models in an optical cavity, Nature Physics21, 916 (2025). 8

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    R. J. Lewis-Swan, M. A. Norcia, J. R. K. Cline, J. K. Thompson, and A. M. Rey, Robust spin squeezing via photon-mediated interactions on an optical clock transi- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 070403 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    S. E. Kuenstner, D. W. Smith, A. J. Winter, E. Ozdemir, T. Mari´ c, A. Matthews, and A. O. Sushkov, Quantum- limited metrology of macroscopic spin ensembles, Nature Physics , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    Davis, G

    E. Davis, G. Bentsen, and M. Schleier-Smith, Approach- ing the heisenberg limit without single-particle detection, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 053601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Welinski, A

    S. Welinski, A. Tiranov, M. Businger, A. Ferrier, M. Afzelius, and P. Goldner, Coherence time extension by large-scale optical spin polarization in a rare-earth doped crystal, Phys. Rev. X10, 031060 (2020). 9 Supplementary Information S1. PROPERTIES OF 171Yb3+ INCaWO 4 CaWO4 is a scheelite-structure crystal in which Yb 3+ substitutes for Ca 2+ at a site w...

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    We therefore useγ inh as the scale of the static disorder and compare the data to simulations spanning Gaussian, Lorentzian, and intermediate Voigt distributions

    For the same FWHM, Gaussian, Lorentzian, and intermediate Voigt profiles produce different decay envelopes and differ in the corresponding 1/ecoherence time by order-unity factors. We therefore useγ inh as the scale of the static disorder and compare the data to simulations spanning Gaussian, Lorentzian, and intermediate Voigt distributions. The simulatio...

    work page