arxiv: 2605.03005 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Taxonomy of Instanton Corrections in Infinite Distance Limits

Manuel Artime , Ralph Blumenhagen , Panagiotis Leivadaros

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords instantonsinfinite distance limitsSchwinger integralR^4 correctionsstring theorymoduli spaceBPS termstaxonomy classification

0 comments

The pith

The Schwinger integral over light towers captures all instantons whose action falls in the window set by the gravity cutoff and lightest mass scale.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines instanton corrections in infinite distance limits of moduli space using the BPS-protected R^4 term as a solvable example. It determines that a one-loop Schwinger integral over the emerging light towers of states generates precisely the instantons with actions parametrically bounded between the inverse ratio and the ratio of the species scale to the lightest mass. This is confirmed through explicit checks in the full moduli space of eight-dimensional toroidal compactifications and several seven-dimensional limits. The approach allows recasting the result in a taxonomy classification to predict the instantonic spectrum for any such limit. This provides a systematic way to identify which non-perturbative effects are controlled by the light degrees of freedom near infinite distance points.

Core claim

Using the BPS-protected higher derivative R^4-term as an exactly solvable example, we analyze which instanton corrections are generated by a one-loop Schwinger integral over the light towers of states that arise in infinite distance limits in moduli space. We find that the Schwinger integral fully captures precisely those instantons whose action lies parametrically in the window (Λ_sp/M_light)^{-1} ≤ S_inst ≤ Λ_sp/M_light. This proposal is supported by considering the entire moduli space of toroidal compactifications in eight dimensions, together with a number of limits in seven dimensions. In each case, integrating out the light towers via the Schwinger integral reproduces the complete贡献 of

What carries the argument

The one-loop Schwinger integral over light towers of states, which reproduces the instanton contributions in the action window (Λ_sp/M_light)^{-1} ≤ S_inst ≤ Λ_sp/M_light

If this is right

Integrating out light towers via the Schwinger integral gives the full instanton contributions within the specified window.
The result holds for the entire moduli space of eight-dimensional toroidal compactifications.
It extends to a number of limits in seven dimensions.
Recasting in taxonomy classification determines the instantonic spectrum for any infinite distance limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This mechanism may generalize to other protected quantities or higher-derivative corrections in string theory.
It could offer a practical method to compute non-perturbative effects in effective theories approaching infinite distance limits without enumerating all instantons.
Connections might exist to the emergence of light towers as per the distance conjecture, influencing the structure of quantum corrections.

Load-bearing premise

The instanton structure observed in the BPS-protected R^4 term for toroidal compactifications generalizes exactly to arbitrary infinite distance limits in other setups.

What would settle it

An explicit computation in a non-toroidal compactification showing that the Schwinger integral either misses some instantons inside the action window or includes ones outside it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03005 by Manuel Artime, Panagiotis Leivadaros, Ralph Blumenhagen.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Tower polytope of the maximally supersymmetric eight-dimensional theory [38]. view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Two slices of the three dimensional tower polytope given in Figure 1. view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Two slices of the three dimensional species polytope. Up to normalization it is view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: This figure shows the two slices of the tower and species polytopes in Figures 2 view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Using the BPS-protected higher derivative $R^4$-term as an exactly solvable example, we analyze which instanton corrections are generated by a one-loop Schwinger integral over the light towers of states that arise in infinite distance limits in moduli space. We find that the Schwinger integral fully captures precisely those instantons whose action lies parametrically in the window $(\Lambda_{\rm sp}/M_{\rm light})^{-1}\le {\rm S}_{\rm inst}\le \Lambda_{\rm sp}/M_{\rm light}$, that is, instantons whose action is bounded by the ratio of the gravity cutoff and the mass scale of the lightest tower. This proposal is supported by considering the entire moduli space of toroidal compactifications in eight dimensions, together with a number of limits in seven dimensions. In each case, integrating out the light towers via the Schwinger integral reproduces the complete contribution of the instantons within the above window. We further recast the proposal in terms of the taxonomy classification, allowing us to determine the emergent instantonic spectrum associated with any infinite distance limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper pins down a parametric window where the Schwinger integral matches known instantons for the R^4 term in toroidal cases, then maps it to their taxonomy, but the step to arbitrary limits rests on an unproven assumption.

read the letter

The main result is that the one-loop Schwinger integral over light towers reproduces exactly the instanton corrections to the BPS-protected R^4 term for actions in the window (Λ_sp/M_light)^{-1} ≤ S_inst ≤ Λ_sp/M_light. They verify this by explicit computation across the full eight-dimensional toroidal moduli space and several seven-dimensional limits, where the instanton spectrum is known and the integral picks out the contributions inside that range. They then recast the finding in terms of their taxonomy to classify the emergent instantonic spectrum for any infinite distance limit. This gives a concrete computational handle on which non-perturbative effects matter in those regimes. The toroidal checks are a clear strength because the geometry allows full control over both the light towers and the instantons, so the agreement is direct rather than inferred. The taxonomy recasting organizes the output usefully for classification purposes. The soft spot is the generalization. The central claim for arbitrary limits assumes the R^4 instanton structure is representative and that no additional non-BPS or geometry-specific instantons enter the window in other compactifications. No general derivation is given that derives the window selection from the taxonomy independently of the specific examples, so the proposal holds firmly for the checked toroidal cases but remains more tentative beyond them. This paper is for people working on infinite distance limits, the swampland program, and non-perturbative corrections in string effective theories. A reader who needs a practical way to bound or compute instanton effects in moduli space limits will get value from the explicit matches and the classification scheme. It deserves peer review because the concrete verifications in the toroidal settings are solid enough to evaluate and the window idea is testable in further examples.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the one-loop Schwinger integral over light towers of states in infinite distance limits exactly reproduces the instanton corrections to the BPS-protected R^4 term whose actions lie in the parametric window (Λ_sp/M_light)^{-1} ≤ S_inst ≤ Λ_sp/M_light. This is verified by explicit computation across the full 8D toroidal moduli space and selected 7D limits, after which the result is recast in terms of the taxonomy classification to predict the emergent instantonic spectrum for arbitrary infinite distance limits.

Significance. If the central window claim holds beyond the checked cases, the work supplies a concrete, taxonomy-based procedure for identifying which instantons contribute to higher-derivative corrections in any infinite-distance limit. The explicit Schwinger-integral matches in the toroidal examples constitute reproducible evidence for those geometries and could serve as a benchmark for future non-toroidal checks.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and §1] Abstract and opening paragraphs of §1: the statement that the Schwinger integral 'fully captures precisely those instantons' for arbitrary infinite distance limits rests on the unproven representativeness of the R^4 example; only toroidal compactifications are checked, leaving open the possibility that geometry-specific or non-BPS instantons enter the window in other limits.
[7D limits section] Section describing the 7D limits: the selected limits are presented as supporting evidence, yet no argument is given that they exhaust the possible infinite-distance behaviors (e.g., those arising from non-toroidal fibrations or Calabi-Yau degenerations), so the extrapolation to the full taxonomy classification remains conditional.
[Taxonomy recast] Taxonomy recast paragraph (near end of manuscript): the claim that the window selection rule follows from the taxonomy classification independently of the compactification is not derived; it is asserted after the toroidal checks, without a general argument that no additional instantons outside the window are generated by the light towers in non-toroidal geometries.

minor comments (1)

The notation for the window bounds could be accompanied by a single schematic plot showing the parametric separation between Λ_sp, M_light and the instanton action scale.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each of the major comments below, clarifying the scope of our claims and indicating the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §1] the statement that the Schwinger integral 'fully captures precisely those instantons' for arbitrary infinite distance limits rests on the unproven representativeness of the R^4 example; only toroidal compactifications are checked, leaving open the possibility that geometry-specific or non-BPS instantons enter the window in other limits.

Authors: We present our finding as a proposal supported by explicit verification across the entire 8D toroidal moduli space and selected 7D limits, using the BPS-protected R^4 term. The taxonomy provides a general classification of infinite distance limits based on light towers. We acknowledge that only toroidal cases have been checked explicitly and that the general statement is conjectural. We will revise the abstract and opening paragraphs of §1 to stress that this is a proposal based on the toroidal evidence and the taxonomy framework, without claiming a general proof. revision: partial
Referee: [7D limits section] the selected limits are presented as supporting evidence, yet no argument is given that they exhaust the possible infinite-distance behaviors (e.g., those arising from non-toroidal fibrations or Calabi-Yau degenerations), so the extrapolation to the full taxonomy classification remains conditional.

Authors: The 7D limits were chosen to cover representative classes of infinite distance limits in the toroidal setting. We agree that they do not exhaust all possible behaviors in more general geometries such as non-toroidal fibrations or Calabi-Yau degenerations. The taxonomy classification is intended to be general, but the extrapolation is indeed based on the checked cases. We will revise the 7D limits section to explain the selection of limits and to note the conditional nature of the general claim, while suggesting future verification in other geometries. revision: yes
Referee: [Taxonomy recast] the claim that the window selection rule follows from the taxonomy classification independently of the compactification is not derived; it is asserted after the toroidal checks, without a general argument that no additional instantons outside the window are generated by the light towers in non-toroidal geometries.

Authors: The recast follows from the observation that the one-loop Schwinger integral is determined solely by the spectrum of light towers, which the taxonomy classifies universally, and the window is defined in terms of the general scales Λ_sp and M_light. In all checked cases, the integral reproduces exactly the instantons in that window. We do not provide a geometry-independent derivation that excludes additional contributions in non-toroidal cases. We will revise the taxonomy recast paragraph to frame the selection rule as a conjecture motivated by the explicit results and the structure of the taxonomy, and add a brief heuristic explanation based on the parametric suppression of instantons outside the window. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation grounded in explicit toroidal checks

full rationale

The paper's central proposal—that the one-loop Schwinger integral over light towers reproduces precisely the instantons in the window (Λ_sp/M_light)^{-1} ≤ S_inst ≤ Λ_sp/M_light—is supported by direct computation on the full 8D toroidal moduli space and selected 7D limits, where the instanton spectrum is independently known and matching is verified. The subsequent recasting in taxonomy terms is described as a reorganization of these explicit results rather than a definitional loop or fitted prediction. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the claim to its own inputs appear in the derivation chain. The generalization beyond checked cases is an extrapolation resting on the representativeness of the R^4 example, but this is not a circular reduction by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the assumption that the R^4 term provides a representative exactly solvable proxy and that the checked toroidal limits are sufficient to establish the general window; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption BPS protection of the R^4 higher-derivative term makes it exactly solvable
Invoked to justify using the R^4 term as the clean test case for the Schwinger integral.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5487 in / 1280 out tokens · 33768 ms · 2026-05-14T21:48:51.957947+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Towards the Realization of the Dark Dimension Scenario in Ho\v{r}ava-Witten Theory
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Hořava-Witten theory offers a potential string embedding of the dark dimension by localizing the Standard Model on the 11th interval, with symmetric tadpole cancellation and an infinite-distance limit helping derive t...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 15 internal anchors

[1]

On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland

H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,”Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21–33,hep-th/0605264

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[2]

Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,

S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “Emergent strings from infinite distance limits,”JHEP02(2022) 190,1910.01135

work page arXiv 2022
[3]

Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem

G. Dvali, “Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,” Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 528–536,0706.2050

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[4]

Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC

G. Dvali and M. Redi, “Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC,”Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 045027,0710.4344

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[5]

Species and Strings

G. Dvali and C. Gomez, “Species and Strings,”1004.3744

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[6]

The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Emergence from an Ultraviolet Cutoff

B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “The Weak Gravity Conjecture and Emergence from an Ultraviolet Cutoff,”Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018), no. 4, 337, 1712.01868

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[7]

Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,

T. W. Grimm, E. Palti, and I. Valenzuela, “Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,”JHEP08(2018) 143,1802.08264

work page arXiv 2018
[8]

Emergence and the Swampland Conjectures

B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius, “Emergence of Weak Coupling at Large Distance in Quantum Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 5, 051601, 1802.08698

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[9]

The Swampland: Introduction and Review

E. Palti, “The Swampland: Introduction and Review,”Fortsch. Phys.67(2019), no. 6, 1900037,1903.06239

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[10]

EFT strings and emergence,

F. Marchesano and L. Melotti, “EFT strings and emergence,”JHEP02(2023) 112, 2211.01409

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

The emergence proposal in quantum gravity and the species scale,

A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, “The emergence proposal in quantum gravity and the species scale,”JHEP06(2023) 047,2212.03908

work page arXiv 2023
[12]

Towers and hierarchies in the Standard Model from Emergence in Quantum Gravity,

A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, “Towers and hierarchies in the Standard Model from Emergence in Quantum Gravity,”JHEP10(2023) 172,2302.00017

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

The emergence proposal and the emergent string,

R. Blumenhagen, A. Gligovic, and A. Paraskevopoulou, “The emergence proposal and the emergent string,”JHEP10(2023) 145,2305.10490

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

Yukawa couplings at infinite distance and swampland towers in chiral theories,

G. F. Casas, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, and F. Marchesano, “Yukawa couplings at infinite distance and swampland towers in chiral theories,”JHEP09(2024) 170,2403.09775. 41

work page arXiv 2024
[15]

Demystifying the Emergence Proposal,

R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, A. Gligovic, and A. Paraskevopoulou, “Demystifying the Emergence Proposal,”JHEP04(2024) 053,2309.11551

work page arXiv 2024
[16]

Emergent M-theory limit,

R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, A. Gligovic, and A. Paraskevopoulou, “Emergent M-theory limit,”Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 2, L021901,2309.11554

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

On the particle picture of Emergence,

J. Hattab and E. Palti, “On the particle picture of Emergence,”JHEP03(2024) 065, 2312.15440

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

Emergence in string theory and Fermi gases,

J. Hattab and E. Palti, “Emergence in string theory and Fermi gases,”JHEP07 (2024) 144,2404.05176

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Emergent potentials and non-perturbative open topological strings,

J. Hattab and E. Palti, “Emergent potentials and non-perturbative open topological strings,”JHEP10(2024) 195,2408.12302

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Notes on integrating out M2 branes,

J. Hattab and E. Palti, “Notes on integrating out M2 branes,”Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025), no. 1, 107,2410.15809

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Emergence of R4-terms in M-theory,

R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, A. Gligovic, and A. Paraskevopoulou, “Emergence of R4-terms in M-theory,”JHEP07(2024) 018,2404.01371

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

Emergence ofF 4-couplings in heterotic/type IIA dual string theories,

M. Artime, R. Blumenhagen, and A. Paraskevopoulou, “Emergence ofF 4-couplings in heterotic/type IIA dual string theories,”Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 7, 730, 2504.05392

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Emergence of CY triple intersection numbers in M-theory,

R. Blumenhagen and A. Gligovic, “Emergence of CY triple intersection numbers in M-theory,”JHEP10(2025) 048,2506.20725

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Comments on the Emergence of 4D Topological Amplitudes in M-Theory,

M. Artime, R. Blumenhagen, A. Gligovic, and P. Leivadaros, “Comments on the Emergence of 4D Topological Amplitudes in M-Theory,”2603.18681

work page arXiv
[25]

Species scale in diverse dimensions,

D. van de Heisteeg, C. Vafa, M. Wiesner, and D. H. Wu, “Species scale in diverse dimensions,”JHEP05(2024) 112,2310.07213

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

Castellano, A

A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, “On the species scale, modular invariance and the gravitational EFT expansion,”JHEP12(2024) 019,2310.07708

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

The double EFT expansion in quantum gravity,

J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, and A. Herr´ aez, “The double EFT expansion in quantum gravity,”SciPost Phys.19(2025), no. 4, 096,2501.14880

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Laplacians in various dimensions and the swampland,

C. Aoufia, A. Castellano, and L. Ib´ a˜ nez, “Laplacians in various dimensions and the swampland,”JHEP02(2026) 203,2506.03253

work page arXiv 2026
[29]

UV/IR relations from the worldsheet,

C. Aoufia, I. Basile, G. Leone, and M. Lotito, “UV/IR relations from the worldsheet,” 2603.11157. 42

work page arXiv
[30]

Emergence of species scale black hole horizons,

J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado, and A. M. Uranga, “Emergence of species scale black hole horizons,”JHEP01(2024) 003,2310.04488

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

D-instantons, Strings and M-theory

M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, “D instantons, strings and M theory,”Phys. Lett. B408 (1997) 122–134,hep-th/9704145

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[32]

One loop in eleven dimensions

M. B. Green, M. Gutperle, and P. Vanhove, “One loop in eleven dimensions,”Phys. Lett. B409(1997) 177–184,hep-th/9706175

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[33]

The Convex Hull Swampland Distance Conjecture and Bounds on Non-geodesics,

J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. M. Uranga, and I. Valenzuela, “The Convex Hull Swampland Distance Conjecture and Bounds on Non-geodesics,”JHEP03(2021) 299, 2012.00034

work page arXiv 2021
[34]

Etheredge, B

M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu, and T. Rudelius, “Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,”JHEP12(2022) 114,2206.04063

work page arXiv 2022
[35]

Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture,

M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela, “Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture,”JHEP12 (2023) 182,2306.16440

work page arXiv 2023
[36]

Entropy bounds and the species scale distance conjecture,

J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, “Entropy bounds and the species scale distance conjecture,”JHEP01(2024) 039,2306.16450

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

Stringy evidence for a universal pattern at infinite distance,

A. Castellano, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela, “Stringy evidence for a universal pattern at infinite distance,”JHEP06(2024) 037,2311.01536

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

Castellano, I

A. Castellano, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela, “Universal Pattern in Quantum Gravity at Infinite Distance,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 18, 181601,2311.01501

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

Taxonomy of infinite distance limits,

M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela, “Taxonomy of infinite distance limits,”JHEP03(2025) 213,2405.20332

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

Small representations, string instantons, and Fourier modes of Eisenstein series (with an appendix by D. Ciubotaru and P. Trapa)

M. B. Green, S. D. Miller, and P. Vanhove, “Small representations, string instantons, and Fourier modes of Eisenstein series,”J. Number Theor.146(2015) 187–309, 1111.2983

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[41]

BPS Amplitudes, Helicity Supertraces and Membranes in M-Theory

B. de Wit and D. L¨ ust, “BPS amplitudes, helicity supertraces and membranes in M theory,”Phys. Lett. B477(2000) 299–308,hep-th/9912225

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[42]

U-duality and M-Theory

N. A. Obers and B. Pioline, “U duality and M theory,”Phys. Rept.318(1999) 113–225,hep-th/9809039

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[43]

Eisenstein Series and String Thresholds

N. A. Obers and B. Pioline, “Eisenstein series and string thresholds,”Commun. Math. Phys.209(2000) 275–324,hep-th/9903113. 43

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[44]

IR/UV mixing, towers of species and swampland conjectures,

A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, “IR/UV mixing, towers of species and swampland conjectures,”JHEP08(2022) 217,2112.10796

work page arXiv 2022
[45]

Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,

M. Etheredge, “Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,”JHEP10(2025) 200, 2505.10615

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Reflections on an M-theoretic Emergence Proposal,

R. Blumenhagen, N. Cribiori, A. Gligovic, and A. Paraskevopoulou, “Reflections on an M-theoretic Emergence Proposal,”PoSCORFU2023(2024) 238,2404.05801

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

The Swampland Distance Conjecture for K¨ ahler moduli,

P. Corvilain, T. W. Grimm, and I. Valenzuela, “The Swampland Distance Conjecture for K¨ ahler moduli,”JHEP08(2019) 075,1812.07548

work page arXiv 2019
[48]

A Distance Conjecture for branes,

M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, and T. Rudelius, “A Distance Conjecture for branes,” JHEP09(2025) 155,2407.20316

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Duality and higher derivative terms in M theory

M. B. Green and P. Vanhove, “Duality and higher derivative terms in M theory,” JHEP01(2006) 093,hep-th/0510027

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[50]

One-loop four-graviton amplitude in eleven-dimensional supergravity

J. G. Russo and A. A. Tseytlin, “One loop four graviton amplitude in eleven-dimensional supergravity,”Nucl. Phys. B508(1997) 245–259,hep-th/9707134. 44

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997