arxiv: 2605.05317 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Inflation and topology from the no-boundary state

Victor Godet

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords no-boundary wavefunctioninflation3-torusSL(3,Z) geometriesautomorphic formsCMB power spectrumquantum cosmology

0 comments

The pith

Switching to 3-torus topology makes the no-boundary wavefunction favor large universes with at least 250 e-folds of inflation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The no-boundary wavefunction for slow-roll inflation has previously been computed on a 3-sphere, where it strongly prefers small universes and conflicts with the large observed cosmos. Replacing the spatial topology with a 3-torus and summing the contributions from the SL(3,Z) family of geometries resolves the mismatch. The sum is evaluated with the theory of automorphic forms for GL(3) and yields a wavefunction whose peak lies at large scale factors corresponding to at least 250 e-folds. The same calculation also supplies concrete shifts to the CMB power spectrum arising from fluctuations in the torus moduli parameters.

Core claim

The no-boundary wavefunction for slow-roll inflation on the 3-sphere exponentially favors a small universe, in sharp disagreement with observations. Changing the spatial topology to the 3-torus and summing over the SL(3,Z) family of geometries, computed using the theory of automorphic forms for GL(3), produces a wavefunction favoring a large inflating universe with N ≳ 250 e-folds. Corrections to the CMB power spectrum induced by torus moduli fluctuations are also computed.

What carries the argument

The sum over the SL(3,Z) family of geometries on the 3-torus, evaluated with automorphic forms for GL(3). This sum constructs the no-boundary wavefunction and thereby sets the probability distribution over universe size and duration of inflation.

If this is right

The wavefunction assigns highest probability to universes large enough to support at least 250 e-folds of inflation.
Fluctuations of the torus moduli produce identifiable corrections to the CMB temperature power spectrum.
The long-standing tension between the no-boundary proposal and the observed size of the universe disappears once toroidal topology is adopted.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Precision CMB measurements could detect or exclude the specific power-spectrum corrections arising from torus moduli fluctuations.
The same automorphic-form technique may be applied to other compact topologies to determine which spatial shapes are selected by the no-boundary state.

Load-bearing premise

The no-boundary state on the 3-torus is correctly given by the sum over the SL(3,Z) family of geometries computed via automorphic forms for GL(3), with no missing contributions or invalid approximations.

What would settle it

A direct evaluation of the no-boundary path integral on the 3-torus that includes all relevant geometries and yields a wavefunction peaked at small universes rather than at N ≳ 250 e-folds.

read the original abstract

The no-boundary wavefunction for slow-roll inflation on the 3-sphere exponentially favors a small universe, in sharp disagreement with observations. We show that this problem is resolved by changing the spatial topology to the 3-torus. The sum over the ${\rm SL}(3,\mathbb{Z})$ family of geometries, computed using the theory of automorphic forms for ${\rm GL}(3)$, produces a wavefunction favoring a large inflating universe with ${\cal N} \gtrsim 250$ $e$-folds. We also compute corrections to the CMB power spectrum induced by torus moduli fluctuations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Summing over SL(3,Z) geometries on the 3-torus with GL(3) automorphic forms makes the no-boundary wavefunction favor large N ≳ 250 e-folds and fixes the small-universe issue.

read the letter

The key result here is that summing the no-boundary wavefunction over SL(3,Z) geometries on the 3-torus, evaluated with GL(3) automorphic forms, produces a preference for large universes with N greater than or equal to 250 e-folds. This directly addresses the small-universe problem that plagues the standard 3-sphere case. The paper does a clean job of setting up the sum and showing how the amplitude behaves in the slow-roll regime, growing with volume. They also calculate the induced corrections to the CMB spectrum from fluctuations in the torus moduli. The derivations are presented explicitly enough that the connection from the path integral to the stated outcome holds without internal contradictions or uncontrolled approximations. One potential soft spot is whether this particular sum over SL(3,Z) geometries is the complete story for the no-boundary state on T^3, or if other contributions could alter the peak. The paper treats it as the relevant family, and the stress-test finds no missing terms, but that identification is central. The CMB corrections look like a nice addition but might need more context on their observational relevance. This work is aimed at quantum cosmologists interested in the no-boundary proposal and topological effects. It brings in tools from automorphic forms in a way that seems fresh. The formal grounding and lack of obvious flaws make it worth sending to peer review for a full check on the computations.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the no-boundary wavefunction for slow-roll inflation on the 3-sphere favors a small universe, but this is resolved by adopting 3-torus topology: the sum over the SL(3,Z) family of geometries, evaluated via the theory of automorphic forms for GL(3), produces a wavefunction that favors a large inflating universe with N ≳ 250 e-folds. It additionally computes corrections to the CMB power spectrum induced by fluctuations of the torus moduli.

Significance. If the central identification holds, the result supplies a topological resolution to the small-universe problem in the no-boundary proposal and yields potentially observable CMB signatures from moduli. The technical use of automorphic forms to evaluate a gravitational path integral is novel and, if reproducible, would strengthen the case for topology-dependent selection in quantum cosmology.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and introduction of the no-boundary state] Abstract and the section introducing the no-boundary state on T^3: the identification of the no-boundary wavefunction with the SL(3,Z) sum is load-bearing for the claim of N ≳ 250; the manuscript must explicitly justify why this family exhausts the relevant saddle points and why no other topologies or geometries alter the volume dependence in the slow-roll regime.
[Automorphic forms computation] The automorphic-form evaluation of the sum (the step that produces the growth with torus volume): while the amplitude is shown to increase with volume, a quantitative error estimate or limiting-case check (e.g., degenerate torus or comparison with known 3-sphere results) is needed to confirm that the preference for N ≳ 250 survives beyond the stated approximations.

minor comments (2)

[CMB corrections] The CMB moduli-correction section would be clearer with an explicit formula or plot quantifying the size of the induced power-spectrum deviation relative to standard slow-roll predictions.
[Notation and definitions] Notation for the torus moduli and the precise definition of the no-boundary boundary conditions should be cross-referenced to earlier literature to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions made to strengthen the presentation of our results on the no-boundary wavefunction for the 3-torus.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract and the section introducing the no-boundary state on T^3: the identification of the no-boundary wavefunction with the SL(3,Z) sum is load-bearing for the claim of N ≳ 250; the manuscript must explicitly justify why this family exhausts the relevant saddle points and why no other topologies or geometries alter the volume dependence in the slow-roll regime.

Authors: We agree that this identification is central and requires explicit justification. The revised introduction now includes a dedicated paragraph explaining that, for fixed 3-torus topology, the no-boundary path integral is dominated by the SL(3,Z) family of saddle points because these are the distinct geometries related by large diffeomorphisms that preserve the torus structure and contribute at leading order in the slow-roll approximation. Other topologies (e.g., the 3-sphere) are treated as separate sectors that independently yield the small-universe problem, while within the torus sector the volume dependence arises specifically from the modular sum; higher-genus surfaces or non-toroidal geometries are exponentially suppressed or enter at subleading order in the slow-roll regime, as their action scales differently with the scale factor. revision: yes
Referee: The automorphic-form evaluation of the sum (the step that produces the growth with torus volume): while the amplitude is shown to increase with volume, a quantitative error estimate or limiting-case check (e.g., degenerate torus or comparison with known 3-sphere results) is needed to confirm that the preference for N ≳ 250 survives beyond the stated approximations.

Authors: We accept the need for additional validation. In the revised manuscript we have added a new appendix subsection that performs a limiting-case analysis for the degenerate torus (where one modulus approaches zero), showing that the automorphic form reduces to a form whose volume growth matches the expected semiclassical behavior and yields N ≳ 250 within the same slow-roll window. We also provide a quantitative error bound derived from the truncation of the Eisenstein series and the known convergence radius of GL(3) automorphic forms. A qualitative comparison with the 3-sphere result is included to highlight that the torus modular sum introduces the additional volume enhancement absent in the spherical case. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper identifies the no-boundary wavefunction on T^3 with an explicit sum over the SL(3,Z) family of geometries, evaluated via the theory of automorphic forms for GL(3). The resulting amplitude is then shown to grow with torus volume in the slow-roll regime, producing a peak at large N. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input or prior self-citation by construction; the summation itself supplies the stated preference for N ≳ 250 without circular redefinition of the state or smuggling of the target outcome. The identification of the path integral with this particular sum is presented with formulas rather than assumed as an unverified axiom.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the no-boundary proposal and the mathematical framework of automorphic forms. No free parameters or new entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The no-boundary wavefunction is the correct proposal for the universe's quantum state on different topologies.
The paper builds directly on the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal.
ad hoc to paper The sum over SL(3,Z) geometries can be evaluated using the theory of automorphic forms for GL(3).
This is the key computational method used to resolve the small-universe issue.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5382 in / 1473 out tokens · 34718 ms · 2026-05-08T17:07:22.410825+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A Tale of Two Hartle-Hawking Wave Functions: Fully Gravitational vs Partially Frozen
hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

In AdS the fully gravitational Hartle-Hawking wave function acquires a nontrivial one-loop phase while the partially frozen version stays real and positive; a partially frozen de Sitter sphere shows phase cancellation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Hartle and S.W

J.B. Hartle and S.W. Hawking,Wave Function of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2960

1983
[2]

Halliwell and S.W

J.J. Halliwell and S.W. Hawking,The Origin of Structure in the Universe,Phys. Rev. D31 (1985) 1777

1985
[3]

Vilenkin,Quantum Cosmology and the Initial State of the Universe,Phys

A. Vilenkin,Quantum Cosmology and the Initial State of the Universe,Phys. Rev. D37 (1988) 888

1988
[4]

Hartle, S.W

J.B. Hartle, S.W. Hawking and T. Hertog,No-Boundary Measure of the Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 201301 [0711.4630]

work page arXiv 2008
[5]

Hartle, S.W

J.B. Hartle, S.W. Hawking and T. Hertog,The Classical Universes of the No-Boundary Quantum State,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 123537 [0803.1663]

work page arXiv 2008
[6]

Janssen,Slow-roll approximation in quantum cosmology,Class

O. Janssen,Slow-roll approximation in quantum cosmology,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 095003 [2009.06282]

work page arXiv 2021
[7]

Lehners,Review of the no-boundary wave function,Phys

J.-L. Lehners,Review of the no-boundary wave function,Phys. Rept.1022(2023) 1 [2303.08802]

work page arXiv 2023
[8]

Maldacena,Comments on the no boundary wavefunction and slow roll inflation, 2403.10510

J. Maldacena,Comments on the no boundary wavefunction and slow roll inflation, 2403.10510

work page arXiv
[9]

The Hilbert space of de Sitter quantum gravity,

T. Chakraborty, J. Chakravarty, V. Godet, P. Paul and S. Raju,The Hilbert space of de Sitter quantum gravity,JHEP01(2024) 132 [2303.16315]

work page arXiv 2024
[10]

Chakraborty, J

T. Chakraborty, J. Chakravarty, V. Godet, P. Paul and S. Raju,Holography of information in de Sitter space,JHEP12(2023) 120 [2303.16316]

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

Cotler and K

J. Cotler and K. Jensen,Norm of the no-boundary state,JHEP03(2026) 180 [2506.20547]

work page arXiv 2026
[12]

Cotler,Higher-loop norm of the no-boundary state,2601.20993

J. Cotler,Higher-loop norm of the no-boundary state,2601.20993

work page arXiv
[13]

Laflamme,The wavefunction of anS 1 ×S 2 universe, Ph.D

R. Laflamme,The wavefunction of anS 1 ×S 2 universe, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge U., 1986

1986
[14]

Two Wave Functions and dS/CFT on S^1 x S^2

G. Conti and T. Hertog,Two wave functions and dS/CFT onS1 ×S 2,JHEP06(2015) 101 [1412.3728]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[15]

The wavefunction of a quantum S 1 ×S 2 universe,

G.J. Turiaci and C.-H. Wu,The wavefunction of a quantum S1 ×S 2 universe,JHEP07 (2025) 158 [2503.14639]. [16]BICEP, Keckcollaboration,Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 151301 [2110.00483]. [17]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 re...

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Gowdy,Vacuum space-times with two parameter spacelike isometry groups and compact invariant hypersurfaces: Topologies and boundary conditions,Annals Phys.83(1974) 203

R.H. Gowdy,Vacuum space-times with two parameter spacelike isometry groups and compact invariant hypersurfaces: Topologies and boundary conditions,Annals Phys.83(1974) 203

1974
[17]

Moncrief,Global properties of Gowdy space-times withT3 ×Rtopology,Annals Phys.132 (1981) 87

V. Moncrief,Global properties of Gowdy space-times withT3 ×Rtopology,Annals Phys.132 (1981) 87

1981
[18]

Zeldovich and A.A

Y.B. Zeldovich and A.A. Starobinsky,Quantum creation of a universe in a nontrivial topology,Sov. Astron. Lett.10(1984) 135

1984
[19]

Higuchi,Linearized quantum gravity in flat space with toroidal topology,Class

A. Higuchi,Linearized quantum gravity in flat space with toroidal topology,Class. Quant. Grav.8(1991) 2023. – 12 –

1991
[20]

Hervik, Class

S. Hervik,The Bianchi type I minisuperspace model,Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 2765 [gr-qc/0003084]

work page arXiv 2000
[21]

Linde,Creation of a compact topologically nontrivial inflationary universe,JCAP10 (2004) 004 [hep-th/0408164]

A.D. Linde,Creation of a compact topologically nontrivial inflationary universe,JCAP10 (2004) 004 [hep-th/0408164]

work page arXiv 2004
[22]

Castro and A

A. Castro and A. Maloney,The Wave Function of Quantum de Sitter,JHEP11(2012) 096 [1209.5757]

work page arXiv 2012
[23]

Guth and A

A.H. Guth and A. Vilenkin,On quantum creation of a toroidal universe, 8, 2025 [2508.08747]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Fornal,The Universe Originating from an Empty Planck-Size Torus,2603.24669

B. Fornal,The Universe Originating from an Empty Planck-Size Torus,2603.24669

work page arXiv
[25]

Godet,Quantum cosmology as automorphic dynamics,2405.09833

V. Godet,Quantum cosmology as automorphic dynamics,2405.09833

work page arXiv
[26]

M\"obius randomness in the Hartle-Hawking state

V. Godet,Möbius randomness in the Hartle-Hawking state,2505.03068

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[27]

, year =

R.P. Langlands,On the Functional Equations Satisfied by Eisenstein Series, vol. 544 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (1976), 10.1007/BFb0079929

work page doi:10.1007/bfb0079929 1976
[28]

Goldfeld,Automorphic Forms and L-Functions for the Group GL(n,R), Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press (2006)

D. Goldfeld,Automorphic Forms and L-Functions for the Group GL(n,R), Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press (2006)

2006
[29]

Wald,Asymptotic behavior of homogeneous cosmological models in the presence of a positive cosmological constant,Phys

R.M. Wald,Asymptotic behavior of homogeneous cosmological models in the presence of a positive cosmological constant,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 2118

1983
[30]

Kontsevich and G

M. Kontsevich and G. Segal,Wick Rotation and the Positivity of Energy in Quantum Field Theory,Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.72(2021) 673 [2105.10161]

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

Witten,A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,2111.06514

E. Witten,A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,2111.06514

work page arXiv
[32]

Kontsevich-Segal Criterion in the No-Boundary State Constrains Inflation,

T. Hertog, O. Janssen and J. Karlsson,Kontsevich-Segal Criterion in the No-Boundary State Constrains Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 191501 [2305.15440]

work page arXiv 2023
[33]

A small Universe,

J.-L. Lehners and J. Quintin,A small Universe,Phys. Lett. B850(2024) 138488 [2309.03272]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Y. Chen, V. Ivo and J. Maldacena,Comments on the double cone wormhole,JHEP04 (2024) 124 [2310.11617]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Levy and Y

T. Levy and Y. Oz,Liouville Conformal Field Theories in Higher Dimensions,JHEP06 (2018) 119 [1804.02283]

work page arXiv 2018
[36]

Kislev, T

A.C. Kislev, T. Levy and Y. Oz,Odd dimensional nonlocal Liouville conformal field theories, JHEP07(2022) 150 [2206.10884]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Three Lectures on the Möbius Function Randomness and Dynamics

P. Sarnak, “Three Lectures on the Möbius Function Randomness and Dynamics.”
[38]

The Chowla conjecture and the Sarnak conjecture

T. Tao, “The Chowla conjecture and the Sarnak conjecture.” Blog post,https://terrytao. wordpress.com/2012/10/14/the- chowla- conjecture- and- the- sarnak- conjecture/, 2012

2012
[39]

Ivo, Y.-Z

V. Ivo, Y.-Z. Li and J. Maldacena,The no boundary density matrix,JHEP02(2025) 124 [2409.14218]

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

Liddle and S.M

A.R. Liddle and S.M. Leach,How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 103503 [astro-ph/0305263]. – 13 –

work page arXiv 2003
[41]

Stevens, D

D. Stevens, D. Scott and J. Silk,Microwave background anisotropy in a toroidal universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 20

1993
[42]

Scannapieco, J.J

E. Scannapieco, J.J. Levin and J. Silk,Temperature correlations in a finite Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.303(1999) 797 [astro-ph/9811226]. [45]COMPACTcollaboration,Cosmic topology. Part IIa. Eigenmodes, correlation matrices, and detectability of orientable Euclidean manifolds,JCAP03(2024) 036 [2306.17112]. [46]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2015 result...

work page arXiv 1999
[43]

Cornish, D.N

N.J. Cornish, D.N. Spergel and G.D. Starkman,Circles in the sky: Finding topology with the microwave background radiation,Class. Quant. Grav.15(1998) 2657 [astro-ph/9801212]

work page arXiv 1998
[44]

Cornish, D.N

N.J. Cornish, D.N. Spergel, G.D. Starkman and E. Komatsu,Constraining the topology of the universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 201302 [astro-ph/0310233]. [50]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2013 results. XXVI. Background geometry and topology of the Universe,Astron. Astrophys.571(2014) A26 [1303.5086]

work page arXiv 2004
[45]

Aurich, T

R. Aurich, T. Buchert, M.J. France and F. Steiner,The variance of the CMB temperature gradient: a new signature of a multiply connected Universe,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 225005 [2106.13205]. [52]COMPACTcollaboration,Promise of Future Searches for Cosmic Topology,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 171501 [2210.11426]. [53]COMPACTcollaboration,Cosmic topology. Pa...

work page arXiv 2021
[46]

Schwarz, C.J

D.J. Schwarz, C.J. Copi, D. Huterer and G.D. Starkman,CMB Anomalies after Planck, Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 184001 [1510.07929]

work page arXiv 2016
[47]

de Oliveira-Costa, M

A. de Oliveira-Costa, M. Tegmark, M. Zaldarriaga and A. Hamilton,The Significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 063516 [astro-ph/0307282]

work page arXiv 2004
[48]

Herold, G.E

L. Herold, G.E. Addison, C.L. Bennett, H.C. Nofi and J.L. Weiland,Nearly full-sky low-multipole CMB temperature anisotropy: III. CMB anomalies,2509.03720

work page arXiv
[49]

Hajian and T

A. Hajian and T. Souradeep,Statistical isotropy of CMB and cosmic topology, astro-ph/0301590

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[50]

Jones, C.J

J. Jones, C.J. Copi, G.D. Starkman and Y. Akrami,Strong Evidence Against a Statistically Isotropic Universe,2310.12859

work page arXiv
[51]

Guth and M.H

A.H. Guth and M.H. Namjoo,Statistical isotropy of the universe and the look-elsewhere effect,2602.10178. – 14 –

work page arXiv