pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06022 · v3 · pith:AI2SPDJNnew · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-th

Lattice fermion formulation via Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Ginsparg-Wilson relation and Overlap fermions

Tatsuhiro Misumi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 23:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-th
keywords lattice fermionsGinsparg-Wilson relationoverlap fermionsPhysics-Informed Neural NetworksDirac operatormachine learninglattice QCD
0
0 comments X

The pith

Physics-informed neural networks reproduce the overlap fermion operator by enforcing the Ginsparg-Wilson relation as a soft constraint.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework that casts the construction of lattice Dirac operators as an optimization task inside a neural network, where physical requirements such as chiral symmetry via the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, locality, and absence of doublers are imposed through the loss function. When the network is trained this way it recovers the standard overlap operator to high numerical accuracy and learns an effective sign-function mapping without being given any polynomial or rational approximation in advance. The same setup is then used for algebraic discovery: starting from a generalized polynomial ansatz the network drives superfluous higher-order coefficients to zero and recovers the usual Ginsparg-Wilson relation, while a change in initial bias yields a distinct Fujikawa-type generalized solution.

Core claim

Treating the Dirac operator as the output of a Physics-Informed Neural Network whose loss penalizes violations of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, locality, and doubler-decoupling conditions produces, to high numerical accuracy, the overlap fermion operator and an implicit sign-function mapping. Within a polynomial ansatz the network autonomously eliminates higher-order terms to recover the standard Ginsparg-Wilson relation; altering the initial search bias yields a distinct Fujikawa-type generalized relation instead.

What carries the argument

Physics-Informed Neural Network whose loss function softly enforces the Ginsparg-Wilson relation together with locality and doubler-decoupling conditions on a generalized ansatz for the Dirac operator.

If this is right

  • The overlap operator can be obtained without supplying an explicit polynomial or rational approximation to the sign function.
  • A broader polynomial ansatz can be searched automatically until only the minimal Ginsparg-Wilson solution remains.
  • Altering the initial bias of the search produces other algebraically valid generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations such as the Fujikawa form.
  • The same constraint-driven optimization extends from operator construction to machine-assisted algebraic discovery on the lattice.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be applied to other lattice discretizations whose defining relations can be written as differentiable constraints.
  • If the soft-constraint approach scales, manual derivation of complicated lattice operators might be replaced by automated search under symmetry requirements.
  • Numerical tests on interacting theories or in higher dimensions would reveal whether the framework remains tractable beyond free fermions.

Load-bearing premise

Encoding the required symmetries and locality as soft penalty terms in the network loss is enough to drive the optimizer to the exact physical overlap operator and to algebraically valid solutions of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation.

What would settle it

On a small lattice, train the network with the stated loss terms and check whether the resulting operator eigenvalues or matrix elements deviate from those of the known overlap operator by more than numerical tolerance; systematic failure would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06022 by Tatsuhiro Misumi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison of the eigenvalue spectrum in the complex plane. Left: The original 2D Wilson view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The effective sign function view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Magnitude of the real-space hopping parameters view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Plots of the kinetic term magnitude view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Plots of the mass term view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The effective sign function similarly realizes a step-like function as shown in Fig. 7. This view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The 4D spectrum of the learned operator. Left: The original 4D Wilson Dirac spectrum (input). view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The effective sign function view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The learned eigenvalue spectrum in 2D. Guided by the generalized polynomial constraint, spatial view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The learned eigenvalue spectrum corresponding to the autonomous discovery of the generalized view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a novel, machine-learning-based framework for constructing lattice fermions using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). Our approach treats the formulation of the Dirac operator as an optimization problem guided by physical requirements, such as symmetries, locality and doubler-decoupling conditions. We first demonstrate that, when trained to satisfy the Ginsparg-Wilson (GW) relation as a soft constraint, a neural network reproduces the overlap fermion operator to high numerical accuracy and learns an effective sign-function mapping without explicitly using a prescribed polynomial or rational approximation. Secondly, we extend the framework from operator construction to machine-assisted algebraic discovery. Within a generalized polynomial ansatz, the network autonomously drives higher-order terms to zero and recovers the standard Ginsparg-Wilson relation. Remarkably, by changing the initial search bias, the same framework also finds a distinct solution corresponding to a Fujikawa-type generalized GW relation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) framework for lattice fermion construction in which the Dirac operator is obtained by minimizing a composite loss that encodes physical requirements (Ginsparg-Wilson relation as a soft constraint, locality, doubler decoupling, and symmetries). It claims that the trained network reproduces the overlap operator to high numerical accuracy, autonomously learns an effective sign-function mapping without an explicit polynomial or rational ansatz, and, within a generalized polynomial search, drives higher-order coefficients to zero to recover the standard GW relation or, with altered bias, a Fujikawa-type generalization.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work demonstrates a constraint-driven ML route to lattice operators that recovers a known exact solution (overlap) and performs limited algebraic discovery without data fitting or hand-crafted approximations. This is a genuine strength relative to conventional overlap constructions that rely on prescribed rational or polynomial approximations to the sign function. The approach could be useful for exploring generalized relations, but its significance is limited by the absence of quantitative verification that soft penalties produce operators satisfying the exact algebraic identities and index theorem beyond loss tolerance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (numerical experiments): the claim that the PINN 'reproduces the overlap fermion operator to high numerical accuracy' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the manuscript supplies no error metrics (e.g., operator-norm deviation from the exact overlap D_ov, eigenvalue spectra, or index values), convergence histories, or direct comparisons on the same gauge configurations; without these, it remains possible that the learned operator satisfies the soft loss to tolerance but differs from the sign-function overlap operator.
  2. [§4] §4 (algebraic discovery): the assertion that the network 'autonomously drives higher-order terms to zero and recovers the standard Ginsparg-Wilson relation' requires explicit verification that the resulting operator satisfies the exact algebraic identity {D,γ5}=2Dγ5D (or its generalized form) to machine precision rather than to the loss tolerance; the soft-constraint formulation does not enforce this identity by construction, so a post-training check (e.g., residual norm on sample configurations or topological index) is needed to rule out nearby but inequivalent solutions.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the generalized polynomial ansatz and the precise form of the soft GW penalty term should be stated explicitly (including the weighting hyperparameters) so that the optimization problem is reproducible.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels in the results section would benefit from indicating the lattice volume and the number of independent training runs used to generate the reported operators.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. The two major comments correctly identify the need for stronger quantitative substantiation of the central claims. We will revise the manuscript to include the requested verifications and metrics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (numerical experiments): the claim that the PINN 'reproduces the overlap fermion operator to high numerical accuracy' is load-bearing for the central result, yet the manuscript supplies no error metrics (e.g., operator-norm deviation from the exact overlap D_ov, eigenvalue spectra, or index values), convergence histories, or direct comparisons on the same gauge configurations; without these, it remains possible that the learned operator satisfies the soft loss to tolerance but differs from the sign-function overlap operator.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative metrics are required to substantiate the reproduction claim. In the revised manuscript we will add: (i) operator-norm deviations ||D_PINN - D_ov|| evaluated on multiple gauge configurations, (ii) direct eigenvalue spectra comparisons, (iii) topological index values, and (iv) training convergence histories. These will be presented alongside the existing loss values to demonstrate that the learned operator matches the sign-function overlap operator beyond loss tolerance. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (algebraic discovery): the assertion that the network 'autonomously drives higher-order terms to zero and recovers the standard Ginsparg-Wilson relation' requires explicit verification that the resulting operator satisfies the exact algebraic identity {D,γ5}=2Dγ5D (or its generalized form) to machine precision rather than to the loss tolerance; the soft-constraint formulation does not enforce this identity by construction, so a post-training check (e.g., residual norm on sample configurations or topological index) is needed to rule out nearby but inequivalent solutions.

    Authors: We accept that post-training verification of the exact algebraic identity is necessary. The revised §4 will include explicit residual-norm checks of {D,γ5}−2Dγ5D (and the generalized form) evaluated to machine precision on held-out configurations, together with index-theorem tests. These checks will be reported separately from the training loss to confirm that the discovered operators satisfy the identities exactly rather than approximately. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: constraints and ansatz are external to the network

full rationale

The derivation treats operator construction as an optimization problem whose loss encodes the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, locality, and doubler-decoupling as independent physical requirements taken from the lattice QCD literature. The network is not fitted to precomputed overlap matrices or sign-function values; it is driven by these external algebraic and locality penalties. The generalized-polynomial discovery step likewise starts from an explicit ansatz whose coefficients are varied under the same external loss; driving higher-order terms to zero is a numerical outcome of that loss, not a definitional identity. No self-citation is invoked as a load-bearing premise, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The reported reproduction of the overlap operator therefore follows from satisfaction of the stated external constraints rather than from any reduction to the network's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the framework rests on standard lattice QCD assumptions plus the capacity of neural networks to approximate operator mappings under soft constraints. No new physical entities are postulated. The polynomial coefficients in the ansatz are adjusted by optimization rather than fitted to external data.

free parameters (1)
  • coefficients of generalized polynomial ansatz
    Network adjusts these during training to satisfy the soft constraints and drive higher-order terms to zero.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Ginsparg-Wilson relation is the appropriate guiding condition for chiral lattice fermions
    Used as the primary soft constraint in both operator construction and algebraic search stages.
  • domain assumption Physics-informed neural networks can represent and optimize Dirac operators under locality and symmetry constraints
    Foundational assumption enabling the entire optimization framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5679 in / 1388 out tokens · 40929 ms · 2026-06-30T23:43:03.959062+00:00 · methodology

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Higher-order hopping-parameter expansion by human-AI collaboration

    hep-lat 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    Trie-structured algorithms compute κ^8 to κ^12 terms in the hopping expansion of Tr ln M at costs scaling from 20x to 8900x a staple, verified by direct comparison to a reference calculation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 49 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Lattice Fermions: Species Doubling, Chiral Invariance, and the Triangle Anomaly,

    L. H. Karsten and J. Smit, “Lattice Fermions: Species Doubling, Chiral Invariance, and the Triangle Anomaly,”Nucl. Phys. B183(1981) 103

    1981

  2. [2]

    Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 1. Proof by Homotopy Theory,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 1. Proof by Homotopy Theory,” Nucl. Phys.B185(1981) 20

    1981

  3. [3]

    Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 2. Intuitive Topological Proof,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 2. Intuitive Topological Proof,” Nucl. Phys.B193(1981) 173–194

    1981

  4. [4]

    No Go Theorem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions,

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “No Go Theorem for Regularizing Chiral Fermions,”Phys. Lett. 105B(1981) 219–223

    1981

  5. [5]

    Quarks and Strings on a Lattice,

    K. G. Wilson, “Quarks and Strings on a Lattice,” inNew Phenomena in Subnuclear Physics: Proceedings, International School of Subnuclear Physics, Erice, Sicily, Jul 11-Aug 1 1975. Part A, pp. 69–142. 1975.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4208-3_6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4208-3_6 1975

  6. [6]

    Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories,

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, “Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson’s Lattice Gauge Theories,”Phys. Rev.D11(1975) 395–408

    1975

  7. [7]

    Lattice Fermions,

    L. Susskind, “Lattice Fermions,”Phys. Rev.D16(1977) 3031–3039

    1977

  8. [8]

    A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,

    P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, “A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice,”Phys. Rev.D25 (1982) 2649

    1982

  9. [9]

    Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation

    M. Luscher, “Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,”Phys. Lett. B 428(1998) 342–345,arXiv:hep-lat/9802011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice

    H. Neuberger, “More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice,”Phys. Lett.B427(1998) 353–355, arXiv:hep-lat/9801031 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    A Method for Simulating Chiral Fermions on the Lattice

    D. B. Kaplan, “A Method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice,”Phys. Lett.B288(1992) 342–347,arXiv:hep-lat/9206013 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  12. [12]

    Chiral Fermions from Lattice Boundaries

    Y. Shamir, “Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries,”Nucl. Phys.B406(1993) 90–106, arXiv:hep-lat/9303005 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  13. [13]

    Axial symmetries in lattice QCD with Kaplan fermions

    V. Furman and Y. Shamir, “Axial symmetries in lattice QCD with Kaplan fermions,”Nucl. Phys. B 439(1995) 54–78,arXiv:hep-lat/9405004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  14. [14]

    A note on Zolotarev optimal rational approximation for the overlap Dirac operator

    T.-W. Chiu, T.-H. Hsieh, C.-H. Huang, and T.-R. Huang, “A Note on the Zolotarev optimal rational 19 approximation for the overlap Dirac operator,”Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 114502, arXiv:hep-lat/0206007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  15. [15]

    Optimal lattice domain-wall fermions

    T.-W. Chiu, “Optimal domain wall fermions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 071601, arXiv:hep-lat/0209153

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  16. [16]

    A new approach to Ginsparg-Wilson fermions

    C. Gattringer, “A New approach to Ginsparg-Wilson fermions,”Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 114501, arXiv:hep-lat/0003005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    Solutions of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation and improved domain wall fermions

    W. Bietenholz, “Solutions of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation and improved domain wall fermions,”Eur. Phys. J. C6(1999) 537–547,arXiv:hep-lat/9803023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  18. [18]

    The Scaling of Exact and Approximate Ginsparg-Wilson Fermions

    W. Bietenholz and I. Hip, “The Scaling of exact and approximate Ginsparg-Wilson fermions,”Nucl. Phys. B570(2000) 423–451,arXiv:hep-lat/9902019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  19. [19]

    Brillouin improvement for Wilson fermions

    S. D¨ urr and G. Koutsou, “Brillouin improvement for Wilson fermions,”Phys. Rev. D83(Jun, 2011) 114512,arXiv:1012.3615 [hep-lat].https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.114512

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.114512 2011

  20. [20]

    Meson and Baryon dispersion relations with Brillouin fermions

    S. D¨ urr, G. Koutsou, and T. Lippert, “Meson and Baryon dispersion relations with Brillouin fermions,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 114514,arXiv:1208.6270 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  21. [21]

    $O(a^2)$-improved actions for heavy quarks and scaling studies on quenched lattices

    Y.-G. Cho, S. Hashimoto, J.-I. Noaki, A. Juttner, and M. Marinkovic, “O(a 2)-improved actions for heavy quarks and scaling studies on quenched lattices,”PoSLATTICE2013(2014) 255, arXiv:1312.4630 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Improved lattice fermion action for heavy quarks

    Y.-G. Cho, S. Hashimoto, A. Juttner, T. Kaneko, M. Marinkovic, J.-I. Noaki, and J. T. Tsang, “Improved lattice fermion action for heavy quarks,”JHEP05(2015) 072,arXiv:1504.01630 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    On the suitability of the Brillouin action as a kernel to the overlap procedure

    S. D¨ urr and G. Koutsou, “On the suitability of the Brillouin action as a kernel to the overlap procedure,”arXiv:1701.00726 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Index Theorem and Overlap Formalism with Naive and Minimally Doubled Fermions

    M. Creutz, T. Kimura, and T. Misumi, “Index Theorem and Overlap Formalism with Naive and Minimally Doubled Fermions,”JHEP12(2010) 041,arXiv:1011.0761 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    New fermion discretizations and their applications

    T. Misumi, “New fermion discretizations and their applications,”PoSLATTICE2012(2012) 005, arXiv:1211.6999 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations

    M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,”J. Comput. Phys.378(2019) 686–707,arXiv:1711.10561 [cs.AI]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory,

    D. Boydaet al., “Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory,” inSnowmass

  28. [28]

    2, 2022.arXiv:2202.05838 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Machine Learning for Lattice QCD,

    A. Tomiya, “Machine Learning for Lattice QCD,”J. Phys. Soc. Jap.94no. 3, (2025) 031006

    2025

  30. [30]

    Machine learning for four-dimensional SU(3) lattice gauge theories

    U. Wenger, “Machine learning for four-dimensional SU(3) lattice gauge theories,” in42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory. 4, 2026.arXiv:2604.12416 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Fixed point actions from convolutional neural networks,

    K. Holland, A. Ipp, D. I. M¨ uller, and U. Wenger, “Fixed point actions from convolutional neural networks,”PoSLATTICE2023(2024) 038,arXiv:2311.17816 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Machine learning a fixed point action for SU(3) 20 gauge theory with a gauge equivariant convolutional neural network,

    K. Holland, A. Ipp, D. I. M¨ uller, and U. Wenger, “Machine learning a fixed point action for SU(3) 20 gauge theory with a gauge equivariant convolutional neural network,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 7, (2024) 074502,arXiv:2401.06481 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    HMC and gradient flow with machine-learned classically perfect fixed point actions,

    U. Wenger, K. Holland, A. Ipp, and D. I. M¨ uller, “HMC and gradient flow with machine-learned classically perfect fixed point actions,”PoSLATTICE2024(2025) 466,arXiv:2502.03315 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Machine-Learned Renormalization-Group-Improved Gauge Actions and Classically Perfect Gradient Flows,

    K. Holland, A. Ipp, D. I. M¨ uller, and U. Wenger, “Machine-Learned Renormalization-Group-Improved Gauge Actions and Classically Perfect Gradient Flows,”Phys. Rev. Lett.136no. 3, (2026) 031901,arXiv:2504.15870 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Yasunaga, K

    S. Yasunaga, K. Yoshimura, A. Tomiya, and Y. Nagai, “Parameter Optimization of Domain-Wall Fermion using Machine Learning,” in42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory. 3, 2026. arXiv:2603.16329 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search

    H. Liu, K. Simonyan, and Y. Yang, “DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search,”arXiv:1806.09055 [cs.LG]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Algebraic Generalization of the Ginsparg-Wilson Relation

    K. Fujikawa, “Algebraic generalization of the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,”Nucl. Phys. B589(2000) 487–503,arXiv:hep-lat/0004012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  38. [38]

    Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations,

    M. Clancy, D. B. Kaplan, and H. Singh, “Generalized Ginsparg-Wilson relations,”Phys. Rev. D109 no. 1, (2024) 014502,arXiv:2309.08542 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Perfect lattice action for asymptotically free theories

    P. Hasenfratz and F. Niedermayer, “Perfect lattice action for asymptotically free theories,”Nucl. Phys. B414(1994) 785–814,arXiv:hep-lat/9308004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  40. [40]

    Perfect Lattice Actions for Quarks and Gluons

    W. Bietenholz and U. J. Wiese, “Perfect lattice actions for quarks and gluons,”Nucl. Phys. B464 (1996) 319–352,arXiv:hep-lat/9510026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    Optimised Dirac Operators on the Lattice: Construction, Properties and Applications

    W. Bietenholz, “Optimised Dirac Operators on the Lattice: Construction, Properties and Applications,”Fortsch. Phys.56(2008) 107–180,arXiv:hep-lat/0611030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  42. [42]

    Lattice Fermions in Euclidean Space-time,

    L. H. Karsten, “Lattice Fermions in Euclidean Space-time,”Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 315–319

    1981

  43. [43]

    ON LATTICE FERMIONS,

    F. Wilczek, “ON LATTICE FERMIONS,”Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 2397

    1987

  44. [44]

    Four-dimensional graphene and chiral fermions

    M. Creutz, “Four-dimensional graphene and chiral fermions,”JHEP04(2008) 017,arXiv:0712.1201 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Creutz Fermions on an Orthogonal Lattice

    A. Borici, “Creutz fermions on an orthogonal lattice,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 074504, arXiv:0712.4401 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    Broken Symmetries from Minimally Doubled Fermions

    P. F. Bedaque, M. I. Buchoff, B. C. Tiburzi, and A. Walker-Loud, “Broken Symmetries from Minimally Doubled Fermions,”Phys. Lett. B662(2008) 449–455,arXiv:0801.3361 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    Search for Fermion Actions on Hyperdiamond Lattices

    P. F. Bedaque, M. I. Buchoff, B. C. Tiburzi, and A. Walker-Loud, “Search for Fermion Actions on Hyperdiamond Lattices,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 017502,arXiv:0804.1145 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    Minimally doubled fermions at one loop

    S. Capitani, J. Weber, and H. Wittig, “Minimally doubled fermions at one loop,”Phys. Lett. B681 (2009) 105–112,arXiv:0907.2825 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  49. [49]

    Characters of Lattice Fermions Based on the Hyperdiamond Lattice

    T. Kimura and T. Misumi, “Characters of Lattice Fermions Based on the Hyperdiamond Lattice,” Prog. Theor. Phys.124(2010) 415–432,arXiv:0907.1371 [hep-lat]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  50. [50]

    Lattice Fermions Based on Higher-Dimensional Hyperdiamond Lattices

    T. Kimura and T. Misumi, “Lattice Fermions Based on Higher-Dimensional Hyperdiamond Lattices,” Prog. Theor. Phys.123(2010) 63–78,arXiv:0907.3774 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [51]

    Classification of Minimally Doubled Fermions

    M. Creutz and T. Misumi, “Classification of Minimally Doubled Fermions,”Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 074502,arXiv:1007.3328 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [52]

    Minimal doubling and point splitting

    M. Creutz, “Minimal doubling and point splitting,”PoSLATTICE2010(2010) 078, arXiv:1009.3154 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    Renormalization of minimally doubled fermions

    S. Capitani, M. Creutz, J. Weber, and H. Wittig, “Renormalization of minimally doubled fermions,” JHEP09(2010) 027,arXiv:1006.2009 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  54. [54]

    Chiral Lattice Fermions, Minimal Doubling, and the Axial Anomaly

    B. C. Tiburzi, “Chiral Lattice Fermions, Minimal Doubling, and the Axial Anomaly,”Phys. Rev. D 82(2010) 034511,arXiv:1006.0172 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    Minimal Doubling Fermion and Hermiticity

    S. Kamata and H. Tanaka, “Minimal Doubling Fermion and Hermiticity,”PTEP2013(2013) 023B05,arXiv:1111.4536 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  56. [56]

    Phase structure for lattice fermions with flavored chemical potential terms

    T. Misumi, “Phase structure for lattice fermions with flavored chemical potential terms,”JHEP08 (2012) 068,arXiv:1206.0969 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  57. [57]

    QCD phase diagram with 2-flavor lattice fermion formulations

    T. Misumi, T. Kimura, and A. Ohnishi, “QCD phase diagram with 2-flavor lattice fermion formulations,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 094505,arXiv:1206.1977 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  58. [58]

    Reducing the number of counterterms with new minimally doubled actions

    S. Capitani, “Reducing the number of counterterms with new minimally doubled actions,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 1, (2014) 014501,arXiv:1307.7497 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    New chiral lattice actions of the Borici-Creutz type

    S. Capitani, “New chiral lattice actions of the Borici-Creutz type,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 7, (2014) 074508,arXiv:1311.5664 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Fermion Actions extracted from Lattice Super Yang-Mills Theories

    T. Misumi, “Fermion Actions extracted from Lattice Super Yang-Mills Theories,”JHEP12(2013) 063,arXiv:1311.4365 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  61. [61]

    Numerical studies of Minimally Doubled Fermions

    J. H. Weber, S. Capitani, and H. Wittig, “Numerical studies of Minimally Doubled Fermions,”PoS LATTICE2013(2014) 122,arXiv:1312.0488 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [62]

    J. H. Weber,Properties of minimally doubled fermions. PhD thesis, Mainz U., 2015. arXiv:1706.07104 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    Dispersion relation and spectral range of Karsten-Wilczek and Borici-Creutz fermions,

    S. D¨ urr and J. H. Weber, “Dispersion relation and spectral range of Karsten-Wilczek and Borici-Creutz fermions,”Phys. Rev. D102(Jul, 2020) 014516,arXiv:2003.10803 [hep-lat]. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014516

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.014516 2020

  64. [64]

    Quantum Many-Body Lattice C-R-T Symmetry: Fractionalization, Anomaly, and Symmetric Mass Generation,

    Y.-Y. Li, J. Wang, and Y.-Z. You, “Quantum Many-Body Lattice C-R-T Symmetry: Fractionalization, Anomaly, and Symmetric Mass Generation,”arXiv:2412.19691 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    Quantized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly,

    A. Chatterjee, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao, “Quantized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 2, (2025) 021601,arXiv:2409.12220 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Symmetries and Anomalies of Hamiltonian Staggered Fermions,

    S. Catterall and A. Pradhan, “Symmetries and Anomalies of Hamiltonian Staggered Fermions,” arXiv:2501.10862 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Quantized axial charge in the Hamiltonian approach to Wilson fermions,

    T. Yamaoka, “Quantized axial charge in the Hamiltonian approach to Wilson fermions,”JHEP10 22 (2025) 102,arXiv:2504.10263 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Non-singlet conserved charges and anomalies in 3+1 D staggered fermions,

    T. Onogi and T. Yamaoka, “Non-singlet conserved charges and anomalies in 3+1 D staggered fermions,”arXiv:2509.04906 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Chiral Anomaly of Kogut-Susskind Fermion in (3+1)-dimensional Hamiltonian formalism,

    S. Aoki, Y. Kikukawa, and T. Takemoto, “Chiral Anomaly of Kogut-Susskind Fermion in (3+1)-dimensional Hamiltonian formalism,”arXiv:2511.06198 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  70. [70]

    Tori, Klein Bottles, and Modulo 8 Parity/Time-reversal Anomalies of 2+1d Staggered Fermions

    N. Seiberg and W. Zhang, “Tori, Klein Bottles, and Modulo 8 Parity/Time-reversal Anomalies of 2+1d Staggered Fermions,”arXiv:2601.01191 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Minimal-doubling and single-Weyl Hamiltonians

    T. Misumi, “Minimal-doubling and single-Weyl fermion Hamiltonians,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 7, (2026) 074521,arXiv:2512.22609 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    Taste-splitting mass and edge modes in $3+1$ D staggered fermions

    T. Misumi, T. Onogi, and T. Yamaoka, “Taste-splitting mass and edge modes in 3 + 1˜D staggered fermions,”arXiv:2604.02078 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Locality properties of Neuberger's lattice Dirac operator

    P. Hernandez, K. Jansen, and M. Luscher, “Locality properties of Neuberger’s lattice Dirac operator,” Nucl. Phys. B552(1999) 363–378,arXiv:hep-lat/9808010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  74. [74]

    Ginsparg-Wilson Relation and Ultralocality

    I. Horvath, “Ginsparg-Wilson relation and ultralocality,”Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 4063–4066, arXiv:hep-lat/9808002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  75. [75]

    The Absence of Ultralocal Ginsparg-Wilson Fermions

    W. Bietenholz, “On the absence of ultralocal Ginsparg-Wilson fermions,”arXiv:hep-lat/9901005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv