Selective Remote Dissipation of an Off-resonant State via Indirect Driving

Hidemasa Yamane

arxiv: 2605.09056 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Selective Remote Dissipation of an Off-resonant State via Indirect Driving

Hidemasa Yamane This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords selective dissipationFloquet drivingremote dissipationtight-binding continuumphoton-assisted channelsquantum dissipation controloff-resonant states

0 comments

The pith

Local periodic driving activates selective remote dissipation for an undriven level while the driven level remains long-lived.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that periodic driving applied locally to one of two discrete levels coupled to a one-dimensional tight-binding continuum can open a decay channel exclusively for the undriven level. Both levels start outside the static continuum band and therefore show no decay in the absence of driving. The drive generates a ladder of Floquet sidebands shifted by integer multiples of the drive frequency, allowing the undriven level to overlap an open sideband via drive-enabled pathways while the driven level avoids comparable overlap or coupling. This remote dissipation is tunable through the drive amplitude, which weights the effective couplings via Bessel functions, and is confirmed by direct time-dependent Schrödinger equation integration together with a projected complex-eigenvalue analysis.

Core claim

Local periodic driving generates photon-assisted Floquet channels that open a selective remote dissipation pathway for the undriven discrete level, giving it a finite decay rate, whereas the driven level can remain long-lived; the dominant pathway is controlled by Bessel-weighted couplings and can be switched by tuning the drive amplitude, with quantitative agreement between the pole-implied decay rate and the time-domain envelope.

What carries the argument

Floquet theory applied to the driven two-level system in a tight-binding continuum, using a Brillouin-Wigner-Feshbach projection of the continuum to obtain a complex-eigenvalue problem whose poles give the selective decay rates.

If this is right

The decay rate of the undriven level becomes tunable by varying the drive amplitude, allowing the remote channel to be switched on or off.
Decay is strongly enhanced when the undriven level energy lies near a sideband edge because of the increased density of states in the tight-binding dispersion.
The driven level can remain long-lived because its effective coupling to the opened sidebands is suppressed relative to the undriven level.
The analytic pole positions obtained after continuum elimination quantitatively match the decay envelope observed in full time-dependent simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same drive-induced sideband mechanism could be used to engineer state-dependent decoherence in larger arrays of levels coupled to the same continuum.
Replacing the one-dimensional tight-binding dispersion with other structured environments would test whether the selectivity persists when the density of states has different singularities.
The approach suggests a route to indirect, drive-controlled dissipation that leaves the driven state available for coherent operations while the undriven state is damped.

Load-bearing premise

The bare energies lie outside the static continuum band so that drive-induced sidebands open a decay channel for the undriven level without comparable destabilization of the driven level or additional interfering effects.

What would settle it

Direct numerical integration of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation showing that the undriven level acquires no finite decay rate or that both levels decay at comparable rates under driving would falsify the selective remote dissipation mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09056 by Hidemasa Yamane.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: (Color online) Schematic picture of the model. Introducing the Bloch eigenstates of the chain, |k⟩ = 1 √ 2π X∞ m=−∞ e ikm|xm⟩, (6) k ∈ [−π, π), then we obtain |xm⟩ = 1 √ 2π Z π −π dk e−ikm|k⟩. (7) These states satisfy ⟨k|k ′ ⟩ = δ(k − k ′ ) and Z π −π dk |k⟩⟨k| = X∞ m=−∞ |xm⟩⟨xm|. (8) In this basis, the Hamiltonian becomes Hˆ tb = Z π −π dk εk|k⟩⟨k|, (9) with energy dispersion εk = e0 − β cos k, (10) herea… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (Color online) Schematic energy structure in the physical (R) and extended Floquet (F ) representations. The tight-binding continuum forms a finite band (gray), while the driven discrete ladder {|ϕ (n) A )⟩} couples to different Floquet channels with Bessel-weighted amplitudes Jn ′−n(χ). The undriven ladder {|dB, n)⟩} couples to the continuum without changing n. This structure allows photon-assisted pathwa… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (Color online) Time-domain decay of the undriven state B near the first-replica edge and comparison with the pole prediction. Solid curves: numerical evaluation of PB(t), with χ = 1.081978 and e0 = 0, β = 1, eA = 1.25, eB = 1.30, gA = gB = 0.05. Dashed lines: exponential envelopes e −2γBt using γB = −ℑzB obtained from the complex pole. dependent time evolutions under the same Hamiltonian parameters: for … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (Color online) Selective dissipation controlled by local driving. (a) Remote dissipation of the undriven level: PA(t) (red) remains close to unity while PB(t) (blue) decays for ω = 2.3025 and χ = 1.081978. (b) Switching and suppression of the remote channel: by choosing χ at the first zero of J0, the decay of B is strongly suppressed while the driven level A decays for ω = 2.2 and χ = 2.404826. The interna… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We show how local periodic driving can be used to control dissipation in a structured environment in a highly selective manner. As a minimal setting, we consider two discrete levels coupled to a one-dimensional tight-binding continuum with a finite bandwidth, where only one level is driven while the other remains undriven. Without driving, both bare energies are placed outside the static continuum band so that neither level decays. We demonstrate that the drive can nevertheless activate a selective remote dissipation channel: the undriven level acquires a finite decay rate, whereas the driven level can remain long-lived. The mechanism is clarified within Floquet theory. Periodic driving generates photon-assisted channels shifted by integer multiples of the drive frequency, effectively creating a ladder of drive-shifted continuum sidebands (Floquet channels). A decay channel for the undriven level opens once its bare energy overlaps an open sideband accessed via drive-enabled pathways; in the tight-binding example, the decay is strongly enhanced near the sideband edge due to the increased density of states. The dominant remote pathway is controlled by Bessel-weighted couplings and can be switched and strongly suppressed by tuning the drive amplitude. We verify these predictions by direct numerical integration of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation. We also formulate a complex-eigenvalue problem for the Floquet Hamiltonian by eliminating the continuum via a Brillouin--Wigner--Feshbach projection, and show that the pole-implied decay rate quantitatively reproduces the time-domain decay envelope.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows local driving can open a selective decay channel for the undriven level via Floquet sidebands while the driven level stays long-lived in their setup, backed by matching numerics and projection.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that periodic driving on one discrete level, coupled to a finite-bandwidth tight-binding continuum, activates decay for the undriven level through photon-assisted sidebands while the driven level remains stable for tuned amplitudes. Both levels start outside the static band, so no decay occurs without the drive. The remote channel opens when the undriven level's energy overlaps a drive-shifted continuum sideband, with the rate boosted near the edge by the density of states and controlled by Bessel-weighted couplings that can be suppressed at certain drive strengths. They verify this with direct time-dependent Schrödinger equation runs and a Brillouin-Wigner-Feshbach projected Floquet eigenvalue problem whose poles match the observed decay envelopes. That cross-check is the strongest part of the work. The numerics and effective model agree quantitatively on the time-domain behavior, which is more than most papers in this area deliver for a minimal model. The mechanism itself is a straightforward application of Floquet theory to selective dissipation, but the concrete demonstration of remote activation without direct destabilization of the driven level is the new piece. The soft spot is the selectivity itself. The same drive term generates sidebands for both levels, so the driven level's self-energy picks up imaginary parts whenever a sideband overlaps the continuum. The paper must be using energy positioning and specific Bessel zeros to keep the driven level's decay small while the indirect pathway for the other level stays open. If that window is narrow or sensitive to small changes in parameters, the effect could be less general than the abstract suggests. Their numerics presumably show it works in the chosen regime, but the letter does not spell out how robust the asymmetry is across a range of drives. This is for researchers in quantum control and open systems who already work with structured baths and Floquet engineering. A reader interested in engineered dissipation protocols would get a usable example and the two verification methods. I would send it to peer review. The claims rest on reproducible numerics plus an explicit projection, so referees can check the parameter choices and the claimed robustness without starting from scratch.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that periodic driving applied locally to one of two discrete levels coupled to a 1D tight-binding continuum (with bare energies outside the static band) can selectively activate a remote dissipation channel for the undriven level via drive-induced Floquet sidebands, while the driven level remains long-lived. The mechanism is analyzed in Floquet theory with Bessel-weighted couplings and sideband overlaps; predictions are verified by direct TDSE integration and by solving a complex-eigenvalue problem obtained via Brillouin-Wigner-Feshbach projection of the continuum.

Significance. If the selectivity is robustly demonstrated, the result provides a concrete route to remote control of dissipation in structured environments using only local driving, which could be relevant for quantum information processing and engineered open systems. Strengths include grounding in standard Floquet theory, use of both time-domain numerics and an effective non-Hermitian Floquet description, and identification of tunable parameters (drive amplitude and frequency) that switch the remote channel.

major comments (2)

[Floquet projection / abstract] Abstract and Floquet analysis: the central claim requires that drive-induced sidebands open a decay channel for the undriven level while the driven level's quasienergy poles remain long-lived. The skeptic note correctly identifies that both effects are controlled by the same local driving term and Bessel factors J_n(A); the manuscript must explicitly show (via the projected self-energies or pole positions) that an asymmetry exists for the chosen parameters such that Im(Σ) is appreciable for the undriven level but suppressed for the driven level. Without this comparison, the selectivity is not yet load-bearing.
[Numerical verification] Verification section: the abstract states that the pole-implied decay rate 'quantitatively reproduces the time-domain decay envelope,' but no specific drive amplitude, frequency, or continuum parameters are provided, nor is an error metric or overlay of the two curves shown. This quantitative support is essential for the claim that the remote channel is activated without comparable destabilization of the driven level.

minor comments (1)

[Model definition] The tight-binding dispersion and the precise placement of the bare energies relative to the band edges should be stated with explicit numerical values in the model section to allow reproduction of the sideband-overlap condition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments help clarify the presentation of the selectivity mechanism. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the explicit comparisons and quantitative details as requested.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract and Floquet analysis: the central claim requires that drive-induced sidebands open a decay channel for the undriven level while the driven level's quasienergy poles remain long-lived. The manuscript must explicitly show (via the projected self-energies or pole positions) that an asymmetry exists for the chosen parameters such that Im(Σ) is appreciable for the undriven level but suppressed for the driven level. Without this comparison, the selectivity is not yet load-bearing.

Authors: We agree that an explicit side-by-side comparison of the projected self-energies strengthens the claim. In the Floquet analysis (Section III), the Brillouin-Wigner-Feshbach projection yields distinct effective non-Hermitian matrices for the driven and undriven levels. The undriven level couples to the n=1 sideband with weight J_1(A) and overlaps the continuum edge, producing finite Im(Σ), while the driven level's resonant coupling is weighted by J_0(A) and detuned for the chosen A such that its pole remains near the real axis. To make this asymmetry load-bearing and immediately visible, we have added a new panel (Figure 4) plotting Im(Σ) versus drive amplitude for both levels at fixed ω, together with the explicit pole positions extracted from the projected Floquet Hamiltonian. revision: yes
Referee: Verification section: the abstract states that the pole-implied decay rate 'quantitatively reproduces the time-domain decay envelope,' but no specific drive amplitude, frequency, or continuum parameters are provided, nor is an error metric or overlay of the two curves shown. This quantitative support is essential for the claim that the remote channel is activated without comparable destabilization of the driven level.

Authors: We accept that the quantitative verification requires more explicit documentation. The parameters (A = 2.4048, ω = 1.2, band edges at ±2, level positions at ±2.5) are stated in the caption of Figure 3 and in the text of Section IV, but we have now moved them into the main body of the verification subsection for prominence. We have also added an overlay plot (new Figure 5) of the TDSE population decay for the undriven level against the exponential envelope exp(−2|Im(E_pole)|t) extracted from the complex eigenvalue, together with the relative L2 error (below 3 % over the displayed interval). The driven level's long lifetime is shown on the same plot for direct comparison. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation grounded in standard Floquet theory and direct numerical verification

full rationale

The paper's central claim is derived from standard Floquet theory applied to a tight-binding model with periodic driving, generating photon-assisted sidebands weighted by Bessel functions J_n(A). The selective remote decay for the undriven level is obtained by analyzing overlaps with the continuum density of states via the projected Floquet Hamiltonian and Brillouin-Wigner-Feshbach elimination, without any fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. Verification proceeds via independent time-dependent Schrödinger equation integration, which reproduces the pole-implied decay rates. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of empirical patterns occur; drive parameters remain external tunable inputs rather than outputs fitted to the target decay rates. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim depends on the tight-binding continuum model and Floquet formalism; drive parameters are chosen to demonstrate the effect rather than fitted to external data.

free parameters (2)

drive amplitude
Tuned to control Bessel-weighted couplings and switch or suppress the remote dissipation pathway
drive frequency
Selected so that a sideband overlaps the undriven level energy while avoiding overlap for the driven level

axioms (2)

domain assumption The environment is a one-dimensional tight-binding chain with finite bandwidth
Allows placement of bare energies outside the band and creates density-of-states features at sideband edges
standard math Floquet theory generates photon-assisted continuum sidebands for the periodically driven system
Underpins the ladder of shifted channels that enable selective decay

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5556 in / 1427 out tokens · 69065 ms · 2026-05-12T02:48:49.528812+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Periodic driving generates photon-assisted channels shifted by integer multiples of the drive frequency... Bessel-weighted couplings
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

complex-eigenvalue problem for the Floquet Hamiltonian by eliminating the continuum via a Brillouin–Wigner–Feshbach projection

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Selective Remote Dissipation of an Off-resonant State via Indirect Driving

Introduction Quantum systems unavoidably couple to their environ- ments and are therefore often described as open systems sub- ject to dissipation and fluctuations. In quantum information processing, such unwanted dissipation and decoherence limit gate fidelities and the attainable circuit depth.1–3) At the same time, controlled system–environment couplin...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

In particular, no direct coupling between discrete levels is introduced; instead, interactions arise solely through a common continuum and a local time- periodic drive

Model Hamiltonian We consider a Fano-Anderson-type model23) in which mul- tiple discrete levels are coupled to a one-dimensional tight- binding continuum (chain). In particular, no direct coupling between discrete levels is introduced; instead, interactions arise solely through a common continuum and a local time- periodic drive. Our aim is to examine whe...

work page
[3]

/tTVIHwcE58fLogzseMeBuFQos0=

No direct coupling between discrete levels is included; therefore, interactions between levelsAandBarise solely via the continuum. …… 1-D quantum wire Adatom A Adatom B <latexit sha1_base64="/tTVIHwcE58fLogzseMeBuFQos0=">AAACcHichVHNLgNRFP46/uunxUZioTRELJrTQYtVsbH0VyQ0zcy4atLpzJiZNqH6Al7AwgaJiHgMGy9g4RHEDomNhTPTiljg3Nx7zv3u+c757r2qbeiuR/QYkpqaW1rb2jvCnV3d...

work page
[4]

2, we employ Floquet theory, which provides a transparent energetic picture in terms of drive-shifted continuum sidebands in different Floquet chan- 2 J

Floquet Formulation To analyze the dynamics generated by the time-periodic Hamiltonian defined in Sec. 2, we employ Floquet theory, which provides a transparent energetic picture in terms of drive-shifted continuum sidebands in different Floquet chan- 2 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. FULL PAPERS nels (also called replica bands) and discrete ladders in an ex- tended H...

work page
[5]

5/BVK3bWQ25OmG7NmObwEI7/2tk=

Analytical Expression by Complex Eigenvalues In this section we derive dispersion equations for the com- plex quasienergies (resonance poles) of the Floquet Hamil- tonian in the extended Hilbert spaceF. The outgoing (re- tarded) boundary condition is imposed by the analytic contin- uationz→z +.16) We first eliminate the tight-binding contin- uum exactly a...

work page
[6]

first-replica edge

Selective Dissipation Induced by Local Driving In this section we demonstrate, in the time domain, that a local periodic drive applied only to the discrete levelAcan in- duce dissipation of the other, undriven levelBin a highly se- lective manner. The numerical results are compared with the complex-quasi-energy (resonance-pole) analysis developed in Sec. ...

work page
[7]

Conclusion We studied a minimal driven Fano-Anderson-type model in which two discrete levels are coupled to a one-dimensional tight-binding continuum, while a local periodic drive is ap- plied only to one of the levels. We addressed whether dissipa- tion of an undriven discrete state can be activated selectively and remotely, even when both bare discrete ...

work page
[8]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione:The theory of open quantum systems (OUP Oxford, 2002)

work page 2002
[9]

Siddiqi: Nature Reviews Materials6(2021) 875

I. Siddiqi: Nature Reviews Materials6(2021) 875

work page 2021
[10]

Blais, A

A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff: Reviews of Modern Physics93(2021) 025005

work page 2021
[11]

Poyatos, J

J. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller: Physical review letters77(1996) 4728

work page 1996
[12]

Verstraete, M

F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac: Nature physics5(2009) 633

work page 2009
[13]

Shankar, M

S. Shankar, M. Hatridge, Z. Leghtas, K. Sliwa, A. Narla, U. V ool, S. M. Girvin, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret: Nature 504(2013) 419

work page 2013
[14]

Y . Zhou, Z. Zhang, Z. Yin, S. Huai, X. Gu, X. Xu, J. Allcock, F. Liu, G. Xi, Q. Yu, H. Zhang, M. Zhang, H. Li, X. Song, D. Zhan Wang, Zheng, S. An, Y . Zheng, and S. Zhang: Nature Communications12 (2021) 5924

work page 2021
[15]

A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V . Iorsh, A. V . Poshakinskiy, and A. N. Poddubny: Reviews of Modern Physics95(2023) 015002

work page 2023
[16]

Kannan, M

B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. Frisk Kockum, J. Braum¨uller, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Veps ¨al¨ainen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Or- lando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver: Nature583(2020) 775

work page 2020
[17]

J. H. Shirley: Physical Review138(1965) B979

work page 1965
[18]

Sambe: Physical Review A7(1973) 2203

H. Sambe: Physical Review A7(1973) 2203

work page 1973
[19]

Eckardt: Reviews of Modern Physics89(2017) 011004

A. Eckardt: Reviews of Modern Physics89(2017) 011004

work page 2017
[20]

M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner: Nature reviews physics2(2020) 229

work page 2020
[21]

Dunlap and V

D. Dunlap and V . Kenkre: Physical Review B34(1986) 3625

work page 1986
[22]

Grossmann, T

F. Grossmann, T. Dittrich, P. Jung, and P. H ¨anggi: Physical review let- ters67(1991) 516

work page 1991
[23]

Petrosky, I

T. Petrosky, I. Prigogine, and S. Tasaki: Physica A (Theoretical and Statistical Physics);(Netherlands)173(1991)

work page 1991
[24]

Petrosky and G

T. Petrosky and G. Ordonez: Physical Review A56(1997) 3507

work page 1997
[25]

Ordonez and S

G. Ordonez and S. Kim: Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics70(2004) 032702

work page 2004
[26]

Yamada, K.-i

N. Yamada, K.-i. Noba, S. Tanaka, and T. Petrosky: Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics86(2012) 014302

work page 2012
[27]

Kanki, S

K. Kanki, S. Garmon, S. Tanaka, and T. Petrosky: Journal of Mathe- matical Physics58(2017)

work page 2017
[28]

Yamane, S

H. Yamane, S. Tanaka, M. Domina, R. Passante, and T. Petrosky: 2017 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Fall (PIERS- FALL), 2017, pp. 1437–1444

work page 2017
[29]

Yamane and S

H. Yamane and S. Tanaka: Symmetry10(2018) 313

work page 2018
[30]

Friedrichs: Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics1 (1948) 361

K. Friedrichs: Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics1 (1948) 361

work page 1948
[31]

Feshbach: Annals of Physics5(1958) 357

H. Feshbach: Annals of Physics5(1958) 357

work page 1958
[32]

J. G. Muga, J. Palao, B. Navarro, and I. Egusquiza: Physics Reports395 (2004) 357

work page 2004
[33]

D. E. Manolopoulos: The Journal of chemical physics117(2002) 9552

work page 2002
[34]

Riss and H.-D

U. Riss and H.-D. Meyer: The Journal of chemical physics105(1996) 1409. 9

work page 1996

[1] [1]

Selective Remote Dissipation of an Off-resonant State via Indirect Driving

Introduction Quantum systems unavoidably couple to their environ- ments and are therefore often described as open systems sub- ject to dissipation and fluctuations. In quantum information processing, such unwanted dissipation and decoherence limit gate fidelities and the attainable circuit depth.1–3) At the same time, controlled system–environment couplin...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[2] [2]

In particular, no direct coupling between discrete levels is introduced; instead, interactions arise solely through a common continuum and a local time- periodic drive

Model Hamiltonian We consider a Fano-Anderson-type model23) in which mul- tiple discrete levels are coupled to a one-dimensional tight- binding continuum (chain). In particular, no direct coupling between discrete levels is introduced; instead, interactions arise solely through a common continuum and a local time- periodic drive. Our aim is to examine whe...

work page

[3] [3]

/tTVIHwcE58fLogzseMeBuFQos0=

No direct coupling between discrete levels is included; therefore, interactions between levelsAandBarise solely via the continuum. …… 1-D quantum wire Adatom A Adatom B <latexit sha1_base64="/tTVIHwcE58fLogzseMeBuFQos0=">AAACcHichVHNLgNRFP46/uunxUZioTRELJrTQYtVsbH0VyQ0zcy4atLpzJiZNqH6Al7AwgaJiHgMGy9g4RHEDomNhTPTiljg3Nx7zv3u+c757r2qbeiuR/QYkpqaW1rb2jvCnV3d...

work page

[4] [4]

2, we employ Floquet theory, which provides a transparent energetic picture in terms of drive-shifted continuum sidebands in different Floquet chan- 2 J

Floquet Formulation To analyze the dynamics generated by the time-periodic Hamiltonian defined in Sec. 2, we employ Floquet theory, which provides a transparent energetic picture in terms of drive-shifted continuum sidebands in different Floquet chan- 2 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. FULL PAPERS nels (also called replica bands) and discrete ladders in an ex- tended H...

work page

[5] [5]

5/BVK3bWQ25OmG7NmObwEI7/2tk=

Analytical Expression by Complex Eigenvalues In this section we derive dispersion equations for the com- plex quasienergies (resonance poles) of the Floquet Hamil- tonian in the extended Hilbert spaceF. The outgoing (re- tarded) boundary condition is imposed by the analytic contin- uationz→z +.16) We first eliminate the tight-binding contin- uum exactly a...

work page

[6] [6]

first-replica edge

Selective Dissipation Induced by Local Driving In this section we demonstrate, in the time domain, that a local periodic drive applied only to the discrete levelAcan in- duce dissipation of the other, undriven levelBin a highly se- lective manner. The numerical results are compared with the complex-quasi-energy (resonance-pole) analysis developed in Sec. ...

work page

[7] [7]

Conclusion We studied a minimal driven Fano-Anderson-type model in which two discrete levels are coupled to a one-dimensional tight-binding continuum, while a local periodic drive is ap- plied only to one of the levels. We addressed whether dissipa- tion of an undriven discrete state can be activated selectively and remotely, even when both bare discrete ...

work page

[8] [8]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione:The theory of open quantum systems (OUP Oxford, 2002)

work page 2002

[9] [9]

Siddiqi: Nature Reviews Materials6(2021) 875

I. Siddiqi: Nature Reviews Materials6(2021) 875

work page 2021

[10] [10]

Blais, A

A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff: Reviews of Modern Physics93(2021) 025005

work page 2021

[11] [11]

Poyatos, J

J. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller: Physical review letters77(1996) 4728

work page 1996

[12] [12]

Verstraete, M

F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac: Nature physics5(2009) 633

work page 2009

[13] [13]

Shankar, M

S. Shankar, M. Hatridge, Z. Leghtas, K. Sliwa, A. Narla, U. V ool, S. M. Girvin, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret: Nature 504(2013) 419

work page 2013

[14] [14]

Y . Zhou, Z. Zhang, Z. Yin, S. Huai, X. Gu, X. Xu, J. Allcock, F. Liu, G. Xi, Q. Yu, H. Zhang, M. Zhang, H. Li, X. Song, D. Zhan Wang, Zheng, S. An, Y . Zheng, and S. Zhang: Nature Communications12 (2021) 5924

work page 2021

[15] [15]

A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V . Iorsh, A. V . Poshakinskiy, and A. N. Poddubny: Reviews of Modern Physics95(2023) 015002

work page 2023

[16] [16]

Kannan, M

B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. Frisk Kockum, J. Braum¨uller, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Veps ¨al¨ainen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Or- lando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver: Nature583(2020) 775

work page 2020

[17] [17]

J. H. Shirley: Physical Review138(1965) B979

work page 1965

[18] [18]

Sambe: Physical Review A7(1973) 2203

H. Sambe: Physical Review A7(1973) 2203

work page 1973

[19] [19]

Eckardt: Reviews of Modern Physics89(2017) 011004

A. Eckardt: Reviews of Modern Physics89(2017) 011004

work page 2017

[20] [20]

M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner: Nature reviews physics2(2020) 229

work page 2020

[21] [21]

Dunlap and V

D. Dunlap and V . Kenkre: Physical Review B34(1986) 3625

work page 1986

[22] [22]

Grossmann, T

F. Grossmann, T. Dittrich, P. Jung, and P. H ¨anggi: Physical review let- ters67(1991) 516

work page 1991

[23] [23]

Petrosky, I

T. Petrosky, I. Prigogine, and S. Tasaki: Physica A (Theoretical and Statistical Physics);(Netherlands)173(1991)

work page 1991

[24] [24]

Petrosky and G

T. Petrosky and G. Ordonez: Physical Review A56(1997) 3507

work page 1997

[25] [25]

Ordonez and S

G. Ordonez and S. Kim: Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics70(2004) 032702

work page 2004

[26] [26]

Yamada, K.-i

N. Yamada, K.-i. Noba, S. Tanaka, and T. Petrosky: Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics86(2012) 014302

work page 2012

[27] [27]

Kanki, S

K. Kanki, S. Garmon, S. Tanaka, and T. Petrosky: Journal of Mathe- matical Physics58(2017)

work page 2017

[28] [28]

Yamane, S

H. Yamane, S. Tanaka, M. Domina, R. Passante, and T. Petrosky: 2017 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Fall (PIERS- FALL), 2017, pp. 1437–1444

work page 2017

[29] [29]

Yamane and S

H. Yamane and S. Tanaka: Symmetry10(2018) 313

work page 2018

[30] [30]

Friedrichs: Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics1 (1948) 361

K. Friedrichs: Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics1 (1948) 361

work page 1948

[31] [31]

Feshbach: Annals of Physics5(1958) 357

H. Feshbach: Annals of Physics5(1958) 357

work page 1958

[32] [32]

J. G. Muga, J. Palao, B. Navarro, and I. Egusquiza: Physics Reports395 (2004) 357

work page 2004

[33] [33]

D. E. Manolopoulos: The Journal of chemical physics117(2002) 9552

work page 2002

[34] [34]

Riss and H.-D

U. Riss and H.-D. Meyer: The Journal of chemical physics105(1996) 1409. 9

work page 1996