pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14340 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 💻 cs.SD

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Refining Pseudo-Audio Prompts with Speech-Text Alignment for Text-Only Domain Adaptation in LLM-Based ASR

Ryo Magoshi , Takashi Maekaku , Yusuke Shinohara
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SD
keywords adaptationpromptspseudo-audiotext-onlyalignmentaudiodemonstratedomain
0
0 comments X

The pith

A speech-text alignment method generates expressive pseudo-audio prompts for effective text-only domain adaptation in LLM-based ASR, outperforming prior text-only approaches on error rates and OOV coverage.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

LLM-based speech recognition systems connect audio encoders to large language models for transcription. Adapting them to new domains is hard because paired speech and text data is scarce. Previous solutions either fine-tune only the language model part, losing acoustic details, or create fake audio prompts from text alone, which often lack expressiveness. This work adds an explicit alignment step between speech and text features when creating those fake prompts. The alignment helps the prompts carry more realistic acoustic information even though no real audio is available for the target domain. Experiments show lower overall error rates and better handling of words not seen in training compared to earlier text-only adaptation techniques.

Core claim

Our method efficiently generates highly expressive pseudo-audio prompts that bridges the modality gap, enabling effective target-domain adaptation. Experiments demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing text-only methods, improving both overall error rates and out-of-vocabulary coverage.

Load-bearing premise

That explicitly modeling speech-text alignment during pseudo-audio prompt generation will produce prompts expressive enough to close the modality gap and yield measurable gains in target-domain ASR without any real audio from that domain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14340 by Ryo Magoshi, Takashi Maekaku, Yusuke Shinohara.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the LLM-based ASR framework. The au￾dio encoder and projector generate audio prompts that are con￾catenated with token embeddings and processed by the LLM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of TE2SL. (a) Training phase: the refinement module learns alignment from LLM token embeddings to audio prompts with pre-trained audio encoder/projector characteristics. (b) Domain adaptation phase: the refinement module is freezed. Text embeddings are randomly upsampled, transformed via the refinement module, and time-masked to generate pseudo-audio prompts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

LLM-based automatic speech recognition models demonstrate strong performance by connecting audio encoders and LLMs. However, data scarcity of paired speech and transcription often hinders their adaptation to new domains, making text-only domain adaptation crucial. Existing methods typically rely on either fine-tuning the LLM alone or employing pseudo-audio prompts. The former neglects essential acoustic context, while the latter either suffers from limited scalability in data-scarce conditions, or yields inexpressive prompts by leveraging only textual features, ignoring audio modality. To address this, we propose an enhanced framework that explicitly models speech-text alignment. Our method efficiently generates highly expressive pseudo-audio prompts that bridges the modality gap, enabling effective target-domain adaptation. Experiments demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing text-only methods, improving both overall error rates and out-of-vocabulary coverage.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no equations, parameters, or entities extractable. Free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be identified without full manuscript.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5442 in / 1079 out tokens · 49025 ms · 2026-05-15T02:18:41.378462+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    As illustrated in Fig- ure 1, these architectures typically input representations from a pre-trained audio encoder into a trainable projector

    Introduction Large Language Models (LLMs) equipped with speech under- standing abilities have demonstrated significant progress in re- cent years, achieving high performance in speech-related tasks such as Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) [1–5], speech translation [2–4, 6, 7], and dialogue [8, 9]. As illustrated in Fig- ure 1, these architectures typica...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Refining Pseudo-Audio Prompts with Speech-Text Alignment for Text-Only Domain Adaptation in LLM-Based ASR

    Related Work 2.1. Text-only Fine-tuning without Audio Prompts The most straightforward approach for domain adaptation in- volves fine-tuning the LLM component using only target- domain text data [18]. Methods such as those designed for low-resource scenarios enable adaptation without the use of audio prompts. While these approaches allow the model to lear...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    LLM-based ASR We follow an LLM-based ASR framework where the LLM is conditioned on an acoustic representation [1]

    Methods 3.1. LLM-based ASR We follow an LLM-based ASR framework where the LLM is conditioned on an acoustic representation [1]. LetDbe the embedding dimension of the LLM,Lbe the length of the tran- scription, andL inst be the length of the instruction tokens. Let TandCbe the sequence length and feature dimension of the audio encoder output, andT ′ be the ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Hours” denotes the total dura- tion of paired audio-text data used for source training, and “#Samples

    Experiments In this section, we evaluate the effectiveness of the pro- posed TE2SL framework through a series of text-only domain adaptation experiments. To demonstrate the impact of our architecture-aware pseudo-audio prompts, we compared TE2SL against three representative strategies summarized in Table 1: (1) the non-adapted Baseline, (2) Soft Prompt [2...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Unlike methods relying only on heuristic em- bedding manipulation, TE2SL employs a learnable Conformer- based refinement module

    Conclusion In this paper, we addressed text-only domain adaptation for LLM-based ASR by proposing Text-Embedding-to-Speech- Latent (TE2SL). Unlike methods relying only on heuristic em- bedding manipulation, TE2SL employs a learnable Conformer- based refinement module. This module synthesizes pseudo- audio prompts that are both sample-dependent and aware o...

    work page

  6. [6]

    The authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the final version and content of the paper

    Generative AI Use Disclosure During the preparation of this work, the authors used generative AI tools for the purpose of editing and polishing the manuscript to improve linguistic clarity and grammatical correctness. The authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the final version and content of the paper

    work page

  7. [7]

    Prompting large language models with speech recog- nition abilities,

    Y . Fathullah, C. Wu, E. Lakomkin, J. Jia, Y . Shangguan, K. Li, J. Guo, W. Xiong, J. Mahadeokar, O. Kalinli, C. Fuegen, and M. Seltzer, “Prompting large language models with speech recog- nition abilities,” inICASSP, 2024, pp. 13 351–13 355

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    AudioPaLM: A Large Language Model That Can Speak and Listen

    P. K. Rubenstein, C. Asawaroengchai, D. D. Nguyen, A. Bapna, Z. Borsos, F. de Chaumont Quitry, P. Chen, D. E. Badawy, W. Han, E. Kharitonovet al., “AudioPaLM: A large language model that can speak and listen,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12925

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    SALMONN: Towards generic hearing abilities for large language models,

    C. Tang, W. Yu, G. Sun, X. Chen, T. Tan, W. Li, L. Lu, Z. Ma, and C. Zhang, “SALMONN: Towards generic hearing abilities for large language models,” inICLR, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    WavLLM: Towards robust and adap- tive speech large language model,

    S. Hu, L. Zhou, S. Liu, S. Chen, L. Meng, H. Hao, J. Pan, X. Liu, J. Li, S. Sivasankaranet al., “WavLLM: Towards robust and adap- tive speech large language model,” inFindings of EMNLP. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics, 2024, pp. 4552–4572

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    An embarrassingly simple approach for LLM with strong ASR capacity,

    Z. Ma, G. Yang, Y . Yang, Z. Gao, J. Wang, Z. Du, F. Yu, Q. Chen, S. Zheng, S. Zhang, and X. Chen, “An embarrassingly simple approach for llm with strong asr capacity,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08846

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    On decoder-only architecture for speech-to-text and large language model integration,

    J. Wu, Y . Gaur, Z. Chen, L. Zhou, Y . Zhu, T. Wang, J. Li, S. Liu, B. Ren, L. Liu, and Y . Wu, “On decoder-only architecture for speech-to-text and large language model integration,” inASRU, 2023, pp. 1–8

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    SLM: Bridge the thin gap between speech and text foundation models,

    M. Wang, W. Han, I. Shafran, Z. Wu, C.-C. Chiu, Y . Cao, N. Chen, Y . Zhang, H. Soltau, P. K. Rubenstein, L. Zilka, D. Yu, G. Pundak, N. Siddhartha, J. Schalkwyk, and Y . Wu, “SLM: Bridge the thin gap between speech and text foundation models,” inASRU, 2023, pp. 1–8

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Audio Flamingo: A novel audio language model with few-shot learning and dialogue abilities,

    Z. Kong, A. Goel, R. Badlani, W. Ping, R. Valle, and B. Catanzaro, “Audio Flamingo: A novel audio language model with few-shot learning and dialogue abilities,” inICML, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    LLaMA-Omni: Seamless speech interaction with large language models,

    Q. Fang, S. Guo, Y . Zhou, Z. Ma, S. Zhang, and Y . Feng, “LLaMA-Omni: Seamless speech interaction with large language models,” inICLR, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Integrating text inputs for training and adapting RNN transducer ASR mod- els,

    S. Thomas, B. Kingsbury, G. Saon, and H.-K. J. Kuo, “Integrating text inputs for training and adapting RNN transducer ASR mod- els,” inICASSP, 2022, pp. 8127–8131

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Internal language model adaptation with text-only data for end- to-end speech recognition,

    Z. Meng, Y . Gaur, N. Kanda, J. Li, X. Chen, Y . Wu, and Y . Gong, “Internal language model adaptation with text-only data for end- to-end speech recognition,” inInterspeech, 2022, pp. 2608–2612

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Efficient text-only domain adap- tation for CTC-based ASR,

    C. Chen, X. Gong, and Y . Qian, “Efficient text-only domain adap- tation for CTC-based ASR,” inASRU, 2023, pp. 1–7

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    JOIST: A joint speech and text streaming model for asr,

    T. N. Sainath, R. Prabhavalkar, A. Bapna, Y . Zhang, Z. Huo, Z. Chen, B. Li, W. Wang, and T. Strohman, “JOIST: A joint speech and text streaming model for asr,” inSLT, 2023, pp. 52–59

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    MAESTRO: Matched speech text repre- sentations through modality matching,

    Z. Chen, Y . Zhang, A. Rosenberg, B. Ramabhadran, P. J. Moreno, A. Bapna, and H. Zen, “MAESTRO: Matched speech text repre- sentations through modality matching,” inInterspeech, 2022, pp. 4093–4097

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Efficient domain adaptation for speech foundation models,

    B. Li, D. Hwang, Z. Huo, J. Bai, G. Prakash, T. N. Sainath, K. Chai Sim, Y . Zhang, W. Han, T. Strohman, and F. Beaufays, “Efficient domain adaptation for speech foundation models,” in ICASSP, 2023, pp. 1–5

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Text-only domain adaptation for end-to-end speech recognition through down-sampling acoustic representation,

    J. Zhu, W. Tong, Y . Xu, C. Song, Z. Wu, Z. You, D. Su, D. Yu, and H. Meng, “Text-only domain adaptation for end-to-end speech recognition through down-sampling acoustic representation,” in Interspeech, 2023, pp. 1334–1338

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Text only domain adaptation with phoneme guided data splicing for end- to-end speech recognition,

    W. Wang, X. Gong, H. Shao, D. Yang, and Y . Qian, “Text only domain adaptation with phoneme guided data splicing for end- to-end speech recognition,” inInterspeech 2023, 2023, pp. 3347– 3351

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Low-resource domain adaptation for speech LLMs via text-only fine-tuning,

    Y . Fang, J. Peng, X. Li, Y . Xi, C. Zhang, G. Zhong, and K. Yu, “Low-resource domain adaptation for speech llms via text-only fine-tuning,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05671

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Text-only domain adaptation for end-to-end ASR us- ing integrated text-to-mel-spectrogram generator,

    V . Bataev, R. Korostik, E. Shabalin, V . Lavrukhin, and B. Gins- burg, “Text-only domain adaptation for end-to-end ASR us- ing integrated text-to-mel-spectrogram generator,” inInterspeech, 2023, pp. 2928–2932

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Effective text adaptation for llm- based asr through soft prompt fine-tuning,

    Y . Ma, Z. Liu, and O. Kalinli, “Effective text adaptation for llm- based asr through soft prompt fine-tuning,” inSLT, 2024, pp. 64– 69

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Conformer: Convolution-augmented transformer for speech recognition,

    A. Gulati, J. Qin, C.-C. Chiu, N. Parmar, Y . Zhang, J. Yu, W. Han, S. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y . Wu, and R. Pang, “Conformer: Convolution-augmented transformer for speech recognition,” in Interspeech, 2020, pp. 5036–5040

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    WavLM: Large- scale self-supervised pre-training for full stack speech process- ing,

    S. Chen, C. Wang, Z. Chen, Y . Wu, S. Liu, Z. Chen, J. Li, N. Kanda, T. Yoshioka, X. Xiao, J. Wu, L. Zhou, S. Ren, Y . Qian, Y . Qian, J. Wu, M. Zeng, X. Yu, and F. Wei, “WavLM: Large- scale self-supervised pre-training for full stack speech process- ing,”JSTSP, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1505–1518, 2022

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    The Llama 3 Herd of Models

    A. Grattafiori, A. Dubey, A. Jauhri, A. Pandey, A. Kadian, A. Al-Dahle, A. Letman, A. Mathur, A. Schelten, A. Vaughan et al., “The Llama 3 herd of models,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21783

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large lan- guage models,

    E. J. Hu, yelong shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y . Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, and W. Chen, “LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large lan- guage models,” inICLR, 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Lib- rispeech: An asr corpus based on public domain audio books,

    V . Panayotov, G. Chen, D. Povey, and S. Khudanpur, “Lib- rispeech: An asr corpus based on public domain audio books,” inICASSP, 2015, pp. 5206–5210

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    SPGISpeech: 5,000 hours of transcribed financial audio for fully formatted end- to-end speech recognition,

    P. K. O’Neill, V . Lavrukhin, S. Majumdar, V . Noroozi, Y . Zhang, O. Kuchaiev, J. Balam, Y . Dovzhenko, K. Freyberg, M. D. Shul- man, B. Ginsburg, S. Watanabe, and G. Kucsko, “SPGISpeech: 5,000 hours of transcribed financial audio for fully formatted end- to-end speech recognition,” inInterspeech, 2021, pp. 1434–1438

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    SlideSpeech: A large scale slide-enriched audio-visual corpus,

    H. Wang, F. Yu, X. Shi, Y . Wang, S. Zhang, and M. Li, “SlideSpeech: A large scale slide-enriched audio-visual corpus,” inICASSP, 2024, pp. 11 076–11 080

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Corpus of spontaneous japanese: its design and evaluation,

    K. Maekawa, “Corpus of spontaneous japanese: its design and evaluation,” inISCA/IEEE Workshop on Spontaneous Speech Pro- cessing and Recognition, 2003, p. paper MMO2

    work page 2003

  35. [35]

    Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion,

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, “Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion,” inICLR, 2019

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    ESPnet: End-to-end speech processing toolkit,

    S. Watanabe, T. Hori, S. Karita, T. Hayashi, J. Nishitoba, Y . Unno, N. Enrique Yalta Soplin, J. Heymann, M. Wiesner, N. Chen, A. Renduchintala, and T. Ochiai, “ESPnet: End-to-end speech processing toolkit,” inInterspeech, 2018, pp. 2207–2211

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Applying conditional random fields to japanese morphological analysis,

    T. Kudo, K. Yamamoto, and Y . Matsumoto, “Applying conditional random fields to japanese morphological analysis,” inEMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004, pp. 230–237

    work page 2004

  38. [38]

    Multi-speaker sequence-to-sequence speech synthesis for data augmentation in acoustic-to-word speech recognition,

    S. Ueno, M. Mimura, S. Sakai, and T. Kawahara, “Multi-speaker sequence-to-sequence speech synthesis for data augmentation in acoustic-to-word speech recognition,” inICASSP, 2019, pp. 6161–6165

    work page 2019