pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15652 · v5 · pith:TNX7WGWYnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 💻 cs.NE · cs.AI

Bridging Silicon and the Hippocampus: Algebro-Deterministic Memory "VaCoAl" as a Substrate for Vector-HaSH and TEM

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.NE cs.AI
keywords hyperdimensional computinghippocampusGalois fieldsharp-wave ripplesvector hashingTolman-Eichenbaum machinecausal reasoningiEEG
0
0 comments X

The pith

VaCoAl uses Galois-field linear-feedback shift registers to supply a deterministic algebraic substrate for hippocampal memory models such as Vector-HaSH and the Tolman-Eichenbaum Machine.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces VaCoAl as an algebro-deterministic hyperdimensional memory architecture. It replaces the random projections of Vector-HaSH with deterministic diffusion based on Galois-field arithmetic while preserving quasi-orthogonality and adding bit-exact reproducibility. The framework also supplies an algebraic account of the multiplicative decay seen in multi-hop replay and aligns its two operating regimes with the direct and trisynaptic pathways of the hippocampal-entorhinal circuit. These alignments are presented as explanations for the 520-million-year conservation of those pathways and as a route to connect hyperdimensional computing with causal reasoning via Pearl's ladder. The work concludes by deriving formal correspondences and concrete iEEG predictions that could be checked experimentally.

Core claim

VaCoAl is an algebro-deterministic hyperdimensional memory architecture built on Galois-field linear-feedback shift registers. Its deterministic Galois-field diffusion offers a substrate-level alternative to Vector-HaSH's random projections, matching quasi-orthogonality while ensuring bit-exact reproducibility. The path-integral Confidence Ratio CR2 provides an algebraically tractable model for the empirically observed multiplicative replay decay. Biologically, VaCoAl's two operating regimes align with the EC-CA3 direct and EC-DG-CA3 trisynaptic pathways. Reversible GF(2) binding supplies the algebra for the do-operator and the dual-orthogonalizer architecture supplies the substrate for Rung

What carries the argument

VaCoAl, the algebro-deterministic hyperdimensional memory architecture built on Galois-field linear-feedback shift registers, which replaces random projections with deterministic Galois-field diffusion while preserving quasi-orthogonality.

If this is right

  • VaCoAl matches the quasi-orthogonality of random projections while guaranteeing bit-exact reproducibility.
  • The Confidence Ratio CR2 supplies an algebraic model of the multiplicative decay observed in hippocampal replay.
  • Alignment of VaCoAl regimes with the direct and trisynaptic pathways accounts for their long evolutionary conservation.
  • Reversible GF(2) binding provides the algebraic machinery for the do-operator and the dual-orthogonalizer enables counterfactual reasoning.
  • The formal correspondences generate specific, testable predictions for iEEG signals during recall and replay.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hardware realizations of VaCoAl could produce more stable and reproducible memory modules for artificial systems that mimic hippocampal function.
  • The algebraic mapping suggests targeted searches for similar Galois-field-like operations in other memory-related circuits.
  • The link to Pearl's ladder could be used to model how the brain performs interventional and counterfactual inference during decision tasks.
  • Computational simulations of VaCoAl networks could be run to check consistency with additional physiological datasets beyond the iEEG predictions already derived.

Load-bearing premise

The DG-CA3 pathway implements a biophysical homologue of Galois-field arithmetic and VaCoAl's two regimes map onto the direct and trisynaptic hippocampal pathways in a functionally meaningful way.

What would settle it

iEEG recordings during multi-hop replay tasks that fail to exhibit the multiplicative fidelity decay predicted by the path-integral Confidence Ratio CR2 would falsify the claimed correspondence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15652 by Hiroyuki Chuma, Kanji Otsuka, Yoichi Sato.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Hippocampal Regime A (blue) and Regime B (orange) in the paper’s vocabulary: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Architectural correspondence between VaCoAl (top, orange) and the hippocampal– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two VaCoAl engineering schedules for exposition (Figure 1 defines hippocampal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two VaCoAl engineering schedules for exposition (Figure 1 defines hippocampal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Database-architectural analogy aligned with hippocampal Regime A/B (not with Va [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Database-architectural analogy aligned with hippocampal Regime A/B (not with Va [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolutionary trajectory of the dual-channel hippocampal–entorhinal interface mapped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Vector-HaSH and the Tolman-Eichenbaum Machine (TEM) propose the hippocampal-entorhinal circuit factorizes memory via a grid-cell scaffold for compositional replay. Concurrently, human iEEG shows sharp-wave ripples gate recall and multi-hop replay fidelity decays multiplicatively. Yet, these fields lack a shared algebraic foundation. We introduce VaCoAl, an algebro-deterministic hyperdimensional memory architecture built on Galois-field linear-feedback shift registers. Its deterministic Galois-field diffusion offers a substrate-level alternative to Vector-HaSH's random projections, matching quasi-orthogonality while ensuring bit-exact reproducibility. Furthermore, the path-integral Confidence Ratio CR2 provides an algebraically tractable model for the empirically observed multiplicative replay decay. Biologically, VaCoAl's two operating regimes align with the EC-CA3 direct and EC-DG-CA3 trisynaptic pathways, explaining their 520-Myr conservation. Independent cellular evidence supports that the DG-CA3 pathway implements a biophysical homologue of Galois-field arithmetic. We also link this framework to Judea Pearl's Ladder of Causation. Reversible GF(2) binding provides the surgical algebra for the do-operator (Rung 2), and VaCoAl's dual-orthogonalizer architecture supplies the parallel substrate required for counterfactual reasoning (Rung 3). Ultimately, we prove these formal correspondences and derive testable iEEG predictions, uniting computational neuroscience, electrophysiology, and hyperdimensional computing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces VaCoAl, an algebro-deterministic hyperdimensional memory architecture based on Galois-field linear-feedback shift registers (LFSRs). It claims this provides a deterministic substrate matching Vector-HaSH quasi-orthogonality while ensuring reproducibility, supplies an algebraically tractable path-integral Confidence Ratio CR2 for modeling multiplicative replay decay observed in iEEG, aligns its two operating regimes with the conserved EC-CA3 direct and EC-DG-CA3 trisynaptic pathways (with DG-CA3 as a biophysical Galois-field arithmetic homologue), links reversible GF(2) binding to Pearl's do-operator and dual-orthogonalizer architecture to counterfactual reasoning, proves formal correspondences across computational neuroscience, electrophysiology, and hyperdimensional computing, and derives testable iEEG predictions.

Significance. If the claimed formal correspondences, mechanistic mappings, and external validations hold, the work could offer a novel algebraic unification bridging hyperdimensional computing models (Vector-HaSH, TEM) with hippocampal circuit function and causality theory, with potential for falsifiable iEEG predictions. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations are identified in the presented claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): The claim that 'independent cellular evidence supports that the DG-CA3 pathway implements a biophysical homologue of Galois-field arithmetic' and that VaCoAl regimes align functionally with the EC-CA3 and EC-DG-CA3 pathways is load-bearing for the unification and conservation explanation, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit derivation mapping measured cellular properties (e.g., synaptic integration, ripple-associated firing) to GF(2^m) addition or LFSR state transitions.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'we prove these formal correspondences' to Vector-HaSH, TEM replay decay via CR2, and Pearl's rungs rests on the CR2 path-integral ratio and the DG-CA3 GF alignment, but these quantities appear defined internally by the VaCoAl architecture without external benchmarks or derivations shown, rendering the proofs circular and the central claim unsupported in the presented text.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract references '520-Myr conservation' and 'multiplicative replay fidelity decays' without citing the specific iEEG studies or datasets used for these empirical observations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below with honest assessment of the presented text. We agree that certain claims in the abstract would benefit from expanded explicit derivations and external benchmarks in the main body, and we commit to revisions that strengthen the exposition while preserving the core algebraic framework.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): The claim that 'independent cellular evidence supports that the DG-CA3 pathway implements a biophysical homologue of Galois-field arithmetic' and that VaCoAl regimes align functionally with the EC-CA3 and EC-DG-CA3 pathways is load-bearing for the unification and conservation explanation, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit derivation mapping measured cellular properties (e.g., synaptic integration, ripple-associated firing) to GF(2^m) addition or LFSR state transitions.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's observation is correct: the abstract asserts the DG-CA3 alignment as a biophysical homologue without supplying a step-by-step derivation from specific cellular measurements (synaptic integration, ripple firing patterns) to GF(2^m) operations or LFSR transitions. The full text references supporting literature on hippocampal pathways but does not perform this explicit mapping. This is a genuine presentational gap. We will revise by adding a dedicated subsection with the required derivation, grounded in published electrophysiological data, to make the claim fully supported. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'we prove these formal correspondences' to Vector-HaSH, TEM replay decay via CR2, and Pearl's rungs rests on the CR2 path-integral ratio and the DG-CA3 GF alignment, but these quantities appear defined internally by the VaCoAl architecture without external benchmarks or derivations shown, rendering the proofs circular and the central claim unsupported in the presented text.

    Authors: The CR2 is algebraically derived from VaCoAl's Galois-field structure, yet its functional form is shown to reproduce the multiplicative decay reported in independent iEEG replay studies, supplying an external empirical benchmark. Correspondences to Vector-HaSH and TEM follow from algebraic equivalence of quasi-orthogonality and compositional operations; the Pearl linkage follows from reversible binding matching intervention semantics. These are not circular in the full text, as external matches are demonstrated. However, to eliminate any perception of unsupported claims, we will expand the relevant sections with explicit side-by-side derivations and benchmark comparisons. revision: partial

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

CR2 modeling of replay decay and pathway alignments reduce to VaCoAl definitions by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Furthermore, the path-integral Confidence Ratio CR2 provides an algebraically tractable model for the empirically observed multiplicative replay decay."

    CR2 is introduced as an element of the VaCoAl architecture itself; its role as a model for the observed decay is therefore forced by the architecture's design choices rather than derived as an independent prediction from external data.

  2. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Biologically, VaCoAl's two operating regimes align with the EC-CA3 direct and EC-DG-CA3 trisynaptic pathways, explaining their 520-Myr conservation. Independent cellular evidence supports that the DG-CA3 pathway implements a biophysical homologue of Galois-field arithmetic."

    The alignment of VaCoAl regimes with the hippocampal pathways and the GF-arithmetic claim are asserted as biological facts supporting the architecture, yet the text presents them as direct consequences of VaCoAl's construction without exhibiting a separate cellular-to-algebra derivation.

full rationale

The abstract introduces VaCoAl on Galois-field LFSRs and immediately presents CR2 as an algebraically tractable model for observed multiplicative decay, while asserting alignment of its two regimes with EC-CA3 and EC-DG-CA3 pathways plus a biophysical GF homologue in DG-CA3. These alignments and the CR2 'prediction' are load-bearing for the claimed proofs of correspondences to Vector-HaSH, TEM, and Pearl's rungs, yet the provided text defines them inside the new architecture without external mechanistic derivation or independent benchmarks shown. This creates partial circularity via fitted-input-called-prediction on the decay model and self-definitional mapping on the biological homology, but the paper still contains independent content in the hyperdimensional computing links and iEEG testability claims, preventing a higher score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the unproven biological alignment of Galois-field operations with DG-CA3 circuitry, the functional equivalence of VaCoAl regimes to the two hippocampal pathways, and the interpretation of CR2 as a model of replay decay. No independent evidence for these mappings is supplied.

free parameters (1)
  • CR2 scaling constants
    Path-integral Confidence Ratio parameters required to match multiplicative decay; values not stated.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Galois-field diffusion produces quasi-orthogonality equivalent to random projections
    Invoked to claim substrate-level alternative to Vector-HaSH without quantitative comparison.
  • ad hoc to paper DG-CA3 pathway implements biophysical Galois-field arithmetic
    Stated as supported by independent cellular evidence but no reference or data given in abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • VaCoAl architecture no independent evidence
    purpose: Deterministic hyperdimensional memory substrate
    New named system introduced to bridge the cited models.
  • CR2 path-integral ratio no independent evidence
    purpose: Algebraic model of replay decay
    Introduced to explain observed multiplicative fidelity decay.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5811 in / 1591 out tokens · 24007 ms · 2026-05-25T06:37:49.690804+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How to Build Marcus's Algebraic Mind: Algebro-Deterministic Substrate over Galois Fields

    cs.NE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PyVaCoAl/VaCoAl is an algebraic hyperdimensional substrate over Galois fields that supplies reversible binding, ordered bundling, and address-space separation to meet Marcus's requirements for operations over variable...

  2. How to Build Marcus's Algebraic Mind: Algebro-Deterministic Substrate over Galois Fields

    cs.NE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PyVaCoAl/VaCoAl uses XOR-and-shift over GF(2) to meet Marcus's three requirements for an algebraic mind and supports Pearl-style counterfactuals via the same algebra.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Beyond LLMs, Sparse Distributed Memory, and Neuromorphics <A Hyper-Dimensional SRAM-CAM "VaCoAl" for Ultra-High Speed, Ultra-Low Power, and Low Cost>

    H. Chuma, K. Otsuka, and Y. Sato, “Beyond LLMs, sparse distributed memory, and neuromorphics: A hyper-dimensional SRAM-CAM ‘VaCoAl’ for ultra-high speed, ultra-low power, and low cost,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.11665, 2026

  2. [2]

    Episodic and associative memory from spatial scaffolds in the hippocampus,

    S. Chandra, S. Sharma, R. Chaudhuri, and I. Fiete, “Episodic and associative memory from spatial scaffolds in the hippocampus,”Nature, vol. 638, pp. 739–751, 2025

  3. [3]

    The Tolman–Eichenbaum Machine: Unifying space and relational memory through generalization in the hippocampal formation,

    J. C. R. Whittington, T. H. Muller, S. Mark, G. Chen, C. Barry, N. Burgess, and T. E. J. Behrens, “The Tolman–Eichenbaum Machine: Unifying space and relational memory through generalization in the hippocampal formation,”Cell, vol. 183, no. 5, pp. 1249–1263, 2020

  4. [4]

    Hippocampal sharp-wave ripples linked to visual episodic recollection in humans,

    Y. Norman, E. M. Yeagle, S.Khuvis, M. Harel, and A.D. Mehta, “Hippocampal sharp-wave ripples linked to visual episodic recollection in humans,”Science, vol. 365, no. 6454, eaax1030, 2019

  5. [5]

    Hippocampal ripples signal contextually mediated episodic recall,

    J. J. Sakon and M. J. Kahana, “Hippocampal ripples signal contextually mediated episodic recall,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 119, no. 40, e2201657119, 2022

  6. [6]

    Coupled ripple oscillations between the medial temporal lobe and neocortex retrieve human memory,

    A. P. Vaz, S. K. Inati, N. Brunel, and K. A. Zaghloul, “Coupled ripple oscillations between the medial temporal lobe and neocortex retrieve human memory,”Science, vol. 363, no. 6430, pp. 975–978, 2019

  7. [7]

    Hippocampal ripples and their coordinated dialogue with the default mode network during recent and remote recollection,

    Y. Norman, O. Raccah, S. Liu, J. Parvizi, and R. Malach, “Hippocampal ripples and their coordinated dialogue with the default mode network during recent and remote recollection,”Neuron, vol. 109, no. 17, pp. 2767–2780.e5, 2021

  8. [8]

    Experience replay supports non-local learning,

    Y. Liu, M. G. Mattar, T. E. J. Behrens, N. D. Daw, and R. J. Dolan, “Experience replay supports non-local learning,”Cell, vol. 184, no. 18, pp. 4797–4810, 2021

  9. [9]

    Generative replay underlies compositional inference in the hippocampal– prefrontal circuit,

    P. Schwartenbeck, A. Baram, Y. Liu, S. Mark, T. Muller, R. Dolan, M. Botvinick, Z. Kurth-Nelson, and T. E. J. Behrens, “Generative replay underlies compositional inference in the hippocampal– prefrontal circuit,”Cell, vol. 186, no. 22, pp. 4885–4897, 2023

  10. [10]

    Ripple contributions to human memory: Making the spiking content count,

    J. Reithler et al., “Ripple contributions to human memory: Making the spiking content count,”Nat. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 26, 2025

  11. [11]

    Human hippocampal ripples loosen medial prefrontal constraints to foster creative thinking,

    L. He, X. Wang, J. Zhang, Z. Xiao, X. Hu, and Y. Liu, “Human hippocampal ripples loosen medial prefrontal constraints to foster creative thinking,”bioRxiv, 2025

  12. [12]

    Kanerva,Sparse Distributed Memory

    P. Kanerva,Sparse Distributed Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988

  13. [13]

    Hyperdimensional computing: An introduction to computing in distributed rep- resentation with high-dimensional random vectors,

    P. Kanerva, “Hyperdimensional computing: An introduction to computing in distributed rep- resentation with high-dimensional random vectors,”Cogn. Comput., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 139–159, 2009

  14. [14]

    A survey on hyperdimensional computing aka vector symbolic architectures, Part I,

    D. Kleyko, D. A. Rachkovskij, E. Osipov, and A. Rahimi, “A survey on hyperdimensional computing aka vector symbolic architectures, Part I,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 130:1–130:40, 2023

  15. [15]

    Holographic reduced representations,

    T. A. Plate, “Holographic reduced representations,”IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 623–641, May 1995

  16. [16]

    Eliasmith,How to Build a Brain: A Neural Architecture for Biological Cognition

    C. Eliasmith,How to Build a Brain: A Neural Architecture for Biological Cognition. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2013

  17. [17]

    Linear codes for hyperdimensional computing,

    N. Raviv, “Linear codes for hyperdimensional computing,”Neural Comput., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1084– 1120, 2024

  18. [18]

    Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities,

    J. J. Hopfield, “Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 2554–2558, 1982

  19. [19]

    Simple memory: A theory for archicortex,

    D. Marr, “Simple memory: A theory for archicortex,”Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, vol. 262, no. 841, pp. 23–81, 1971. 49

  20. [20]

    Computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory,

    A. Treves and E. T. Rolls, “Computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory,” Hippocampus, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 374–391, 1994

  21. [21]

    Dentate gyrus NMDA receptors mediate rapid pattern separation in the hippocampal network,

    T. J. McHugh et al., “Dentate gyrus NMDA receptors mediate rapid pattern separation in the hippocampal network,”Science, vol. 317, no. 5834, pp. 94–99, 2007

  22. [22]

    Requirement for hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors in associative memory recall,

    K. Nakazawa et al., “Requirement for hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors in associative memory recall,”Science, vol. 297, no. 5579, pp. 211–218, 2002

  23. [23]

    Sparseness and expansion in sensory representations,

    B. Babadi and H. Sompolinsky, “Sparseness and expansion in sensory representations,”Neuron, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1213–1226, 2014

  24. [24]

    Optimal degrees of synaptic connectivity,

    A. Litwin-Kumar, K. D. Harris, R. Axel, H. Sompolinsky, and L. F. Abbott, “Optimal degrees of synaptic connectivity,”Neuron, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 1153–1164, 2017

  25. [25]

    Re-evaluating circuit mechanisms underlying pattern separation,

    N. A. Cayco-Gajic and R. A. Silver, “Re-evaluating circuit mechanisms underlying pattern separation,” Neuron, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 584–602, 2019

  26. [26]

    Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning,

    G. Buzs´ aki, “Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning,”Hippocampus, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1073–1188, 2015

  27. [27]

    Forward and reverse hippocampal place-cell sequences during ripples,

    K. Diba and G. Buzs´ aki, “Forward and reverse hippocampal place-cell sequences during ripples,” Nat. Neurosci., vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1241–1242, 2007

  28. [28]

    Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals,

    B. E. Pfeiffer and D. J. Foster, “Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals,”Nature, vol. 497, no. 7447, pp. 74–79, 2013

  29. [29]

    Selective suppression of hippocampal ripples impairs spatial memory,

    G. Girardeau, K. Benchenane, S. I. Wiener, G. Buzs´ aki, and M. B. Zugaro, “Selective suppression of hippocampal ripples impairs spatial memory,”Nat. Neurosci., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1222–1223, 2009

  30. [30]

    Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type,

    G.-Q. Bi and M.-M. Poo, “Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type,”J. Neurosci., vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 10464–10472, 1998

  31. [31]

    Experience-dependent asymmetric shape of hippocampal receptive fields,

    M. R. Mehta, M. C. Quirk, and M. A. Wilson, “Experience-dependent asymmetric shape of hippocampal receptive fields,”Neuron, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 707–715, 2000

  32. [32]

    N. J. Cohen and H. Eichenbaum,Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993

  33. [33]

    Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain,

    D. L. Schacter, D. R. Addis, and R. L. Buckner, “Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain,”Nat. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 657–661, 2007

  34. [34]

    A generative model of memory construction and consolidation,

    E. Spens and N. Burgess, “A generative model of memory construction and consolidation,”Nat. Hum. Behav., vol. 8, pp. 526–543, 2024

  35. [35]

    E. T. Rolls,Brain Computations and Connectivity, 2nd ed. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2023

  36. [36]

    Infantile amnesia: A neurogenic hypothesis,

    S. A. Josselyn and P. W. Frankland, “Infantile amnesia: A neurogenic hypothesis,”Learn. Mem., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 423–433, 2012

  37. [37]

    Hippocampal neurogenesis regulates forgetting during adulthood and infancy,

    K. G. Akers et al., “Hippocampal neurogenesis regulates forgetting during adulthood and infancy,” Science, vol. 344, no. 6184, pp. 598–602, 2014

  38. [38]

    E. A. Murray, S. P. Wise, and K. S. Graham,The Evolution of Memory Systems: Ancestors, Anatomy, and Adaptations. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2017

  39. [39]

    Ram´ on y Cajal,Histologie du Syst` eme Nerveux de l’Homme et des Vert´ ebr´ es

    S. Ram´ on y Cajal,Histologie du Syst` eme Nerveux de l’Homme et des Vert´ ebr´ es. Paris: Maloine, 1911

  40. [40]

    Human adult neurogenesis: Evidence and remaining questions,

    G. Kempermann et al., “Human adult neurogenesis: Evidence and remaining questions,”Cell Stem Cell, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2018. 50

  41. [41]

    Differential contributions of dorsal hippocampal subregions to memory acquisition and retrieval in contextual fear-conditioning,

    I. Lee and R. P. Kesner, “Differential contributions of dorsal hippocampal subregions to memory acquisition and retrieval in contextual fear-conditioning,”Hippocampus, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 301–310, 2004

  42. [42]

    Dissociations of the medial and lateral perforant path projections into dorsal DG, CA3, and CA1 for spatial and nonspatial (visual object) information processing,

    M. R. Hunsaker, J. T. Mooy, R. E. Swift, and R. P. Kesner, “Dissociations of the medial and lateral perforant path projections into dorsal DG, CA3, and CA1 for spatial and nonspatial (visual object) information processing,”Behav. Neurosci., vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 742–750, 2007

  43. [43]

    Evaluating the differential roles of the dorsal dentate gyrus, dorsal CA3, and dorsal CA1 during a temporal ordering for spatial locations task,

    M. R. Hunsaker and R. P. Kesner, “Evaluating the differential roles of the dorsal dentate gyrus, dorsal CA3, and dorsal CA1 during a temporal ordering for spatial locations task,”Hippocampus, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 955–964, 2008

  44. [44]

    Neuromodulation of the feedforward dentate gyrus–CA3 microcircuit,

    B. Hassel, M. D. Allenby, S. A. Buchanan, and J. M. Wojtowicz, “Neuromodulation of the feedforward dentate gyrus–CA3 microcircuit,”Front. Synaptic Neurosci., vol. 8, p. 32, 2016

  45. [45]

    Postnatal development of mossy cells in the human dentate gyrus: A light microscopic Golgi study,

    L. Seress and L. Mrzljak, “Postnatal development of mossy cells in the human dentate gyrus: A light microscopic Golgi study,”Hippocampus, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 127–141, 1992

  46. [46]

    Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus,

    J. K. Leutgeb et al., “Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus,”Science, vol. 315, no. 5814, pp. 961–966, 2007

  47. [47]

    The hippocampal-VTA loop: Controlling the entry of information into long-term memory,

    J. E. Lisman and A. A. Grace, “The hippocampal-VTA loop: Controlling the entry of information into long-term memory,”Neuron, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 703–713, 2005

  48. [48]

    Novelty-related motivation of anticipation and exploration by dopamine,

    E. D¨ uzel et al., “Novelty-related motivation of anticipation and exploration by dopamine,”Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 381–389, 2010

  49. [49]

    Comparative anatomy of the hippocampal dentate gyrus in adult and developing rodents, non-human primates and humans,

    L. Seress, “Comparative anatomy of the hippocampal dentate gyrus in adult and developing rodents, non-human primates and humans,”Prog. Brain Res., vol. 163, pp. 23–41, 2007

  50. [50]

    Basal dendrites of granule cells are normal features of the fetal and adult dentate gyrus of both monkey and human hippocampal formations,

    L. Seress et al., “Basal dendrites of granule cells are normal features of the fetal and adult dentate gyrus of both monkey and human hippocampal formations,”Brain Res., vol. 405, no. 1, pp. 169–174, 1987

  51. [51]

    Comparative anatomy of the dentate mossy cells in nonhuman primates: Their spatial distributions and axonal projections compared with mouse mossy cells,

    Y. Saito et al., “Comparative anatomy of the dentate mossy cells in nonhuman primates: Their spatial distributions and axonal projections compared with mouse mossy cells,”eNeuro, vol. 11, no. 5, ENEURO.0151-24.2024, 2024

  52. [52]

    Recurrent excitatory feedback from mossy cells enhances sparsity and pattern separation in the dentate gyrus via indirect feedback inhibition,

    A. R. Galloni, A. Samadzelkava, K. Hiremath, R. Oumnov, and A. D. Milstein, “Recurrent excitatory feedback from mossy cells enhances sparsity and pattern separation in the dentate gyrus via indirect feedback inhibition,”Front. Comput. Neurosci., vol. 16, 826278, 2022

  53. [53]

    1.1 Computing’s energy problem (and what we can do about it),

    M. Horowitz, “1.1 Computing’s energy problem (and what we can do about it),” inProc. IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf., 2014, pp. 10–14

  54. [54]

    An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain,

    D. Attwell and S. B. Laughlin, “An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain,”J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1133–1145, 2001

  55. [55]

    Lidl and H

    R. Lidl and H. Niederreiter,Finite Fields, 2nd ed., ser. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 20. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997

  56. [56]

    Internally generated cell assembly sequences in the rat hippocampus,

    E. Pastalkova, V. Itskov, A. Amarasingham, and G. Buzs´ aki, “Internally generated cell assembly sequences in the rat hippocampus,”Science, vol. 321, no. 5894, pp. 1322–1327, 2008

  57. [57]

    Hippocampal ‘time cells’ bridge the gap in memory for discontiguous events,

    C. J. MacDonald, K. Q. Lepage, U. T. Eden, and H. Eichenbaum, “Hippocampal ‘time cells’ bridge the gap in memory for discontiguous events,”Neuron, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 737–749, 2011

  58. [58]

    Potential role for adult neurogenesis in the encoding of time in new memories,

    J. B. Aimone, J. Wiles, and F. H. Gage, “Potential role for adult neurogenesis in the encoding of time in new memories,”Nat. Neurosci., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 723–727, 2006

  59. [59]

    Resolving new memories: A critical look at the dentate gyrus, adult neurogenesis, and pattern separation,

    J. B. Aimone, W. Deng, and F. H. Gage, “Resolving new memories: A critical look at the dentate gyrus, adult neurogenesis, and pattern separation,”Neuron, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 589–596, 2011. 51

  60. [60]

    Single granule cells reliably discharge targets in the hippocampal CA3 networkin vivo,

    D. A. Henze, L. Wittner, and G. Buzs´ aki, “Single granule cells reliably discharge targets in the hippocampal CA3 networkin vivo,”Nat. Neurosci., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 790–795, 2002

  61. [61]

    Plasticity-dependent, full detonation at hippocampal mossy fiber–CA3 pyramidal neuron synapses,

    N. P. Vyleta, C. Borges-Merjane, and P. Jonas, “Plasticity-dependent, full detonation at hippocampal mossy fiber–CA3 pyramidal neuron synapses,”eLife, vol. 5, e17977, 2016

  62. [62]

    Action potential counting at giant mossy fiber terminals gates information transfer in the hippocampus,

    S. Chamberland, Y. Timofeeva, A. Evstratova, K. Volynski, and K. T´ oth, “Action potential counting at giant mossy fiber terminals gates information transfer in the hippocampus,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 115, no. 28, pp. 7434–7439, 2018

  63. [63]

    Sparse activity of identified dentate granule cells during spatial exploration,

    M. Diamantaki, M. Frey, P. Berens, P. Preston-Ferrer, and A. Burgalossi, “Sparse activity of identified dentate granule cells during spatial exploration,”eLife, vol. 5, e20252, 2016

  64. [64]

    Theta-gamma-modulated synaptic currents in hippocampal granule cellsin vivodefine a mechanism for network oscillations,

    A. J. Perni´ a-Andrade and P. Jonas, “Theta-gamma-modulated synaptic currents in hippocampal granule cellsin vivodefine a mechanism for network oscillations,”Neuron, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 140–152, 2014

  65. [65]

    Dendritic integration in hippocampal dentate granule cells,

    R. Krueppel, S. Remy, and H. Beck, “Dendritic integration in hippocampal dentate granule cells,” Neuron, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 512–528, 2011

  66. [66]

    GABAergic cells are the major postsynaptic targets of mossy fibers in the rat hippocampus,

    L. Acs´ ady, A. Kamondi, A. S´ ık, T. Freund, and G. Buzs´ aki, “GABAergic cells are the major postsynaptic targets of mossy fibers in the rat hippocampus,”J. Neurosci., vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 3386– 3403, 1998

  67. [67]

    The mossy fiber bouton: The ‘common’ or the ‘unique’ synapse?,

    A. Rollenhagen and J. H. R. L¨ ubke, “The mossy fiber bouton: The ‘common’ or the ‘unique’ synapse?,”Front. Synaptic Neurosci., vol. 2, p. 2, 2010

  68. [68]

    Deconstructing complexity: Serial block-face electron microscopic analysis of the hippocampal mossy fiber synapse,

    S. A. Wilke, J. K. Antonios, E. A. Bushong, A. Badkoobehi, E. Malek, M. Hwang, M. Terada, M. H. Ellisman, and A. Ghosh, “Deconstructing complexity: Serial block-face electron microscopic analysis of the hippocampal mossy fiber synapse,”J. Neurosci., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 507–522, 2013

  69. [69]

    Long-term rear- rangements of hippocampal mossy fiber terminal connectivity in the adult regulated by experience,

    I. Galimberti, N. Gogolla, S. Alberi, A. F. Santos, D. Muller, and P. Caroni, “Long-term rear- rangements of hippocampal mossy fiber terminal connectivity in the adult regulated by experience,” Neuron, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 749–763, 2006

  70. [70]

    Synaptic mechanisms of pattern completion in the hippocampal CA3 network,

    S. J. Guzm´ an, A. Schl¨ ogl, M. Frotscher, and P. Jonas, “Synaptic mechanisms of pattern completion in the hippocampal CA3 network,”Science, vol. 353, no. 6304, pp. 1117–1123, 2016

  71. [71]

    Interneuronal mechanisms of hippocampal theta oscillations in a full-scale model of the rodent CA1 circuit,

    M. J. Bezaire, I. Raikov, K. Burk, D. Vyas, and I. Soltesz, “Interneuronal mechanisms of hippocampal theta oscillations in a full-scale model of the rodent CA1 circuit,”eLife, vol. 5, e18566, 2016

  72. [72]

    Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons,

    A. Gidon, T. A. Zolnik, P. Fidzinski, F. Bolduan, A. Papoutsi, P. Poirazi, M. Holtkamp, I. Vida, and M. E. Larkum, “Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6473, pp. 83–87, 2020

  73. [73]

    Differential structure of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in the human and mouse,

    R. Benavides-Piccione, M. Regalado-Reyes, I. Fernaud-Espinosa, A. Kastanauskaite, S. Tapia- Gonz´ alez, G. Le´ on-Espinosa, C. Rojo, R. Insausti, I. Segev, and J. DeFelipe, “Differential structure of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in the human and mouse,”Cereb. Cortex, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 730–752, 2020

  74. [74]

    Computational constraints suggest the need for two distinct input systems to the hippocampal CA3 network,

    A. Treves and E. T. Rolls, “Computational constraints suggest the need for two distinct input systems to the hippocampal CA3 network,”Hippocampus, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 189–199, 1992

  75. [75]

    A computational theory of hippocampal function, and tests of the theory: New developments,

    R. P. Kesner and E. T. Rolls, “A computational theory of hippocampal function, and tests of the theory: New developments,”Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., vol. 48, pp. 92–147, 2015

  76. [76]

    Pearl and D

    J. Pearl and D. Mackenzie,The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. New York: Basic Books, 2018

  77. [77]

    Pearl,Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, 2nd ed

    J. Pearl,Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009

  78. [78]

    Y. N. Harari,Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York: Harper, 2015. 52

  79. [79]

    A theoretical analysis of electrical properties of spines,

    C. Koch and T. Poggio, “A theoretical analysis of electrical properties of spines,”Proc. R. Soc. B, vol. 218, no. 1213, pp. 455–477, 1983

  80. [80]

    The cost of cortical computation,

    P. Lennie, “The cost of cortical computation,”Curr. Biol., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 493–497, 2003

Showing first 80 references.