Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

This paper claims that the deep-IR two- and three-point correlators of the toy model for holographic cosmology are logarithm-finite at two loops, saturate to constants set by the mass, and correspond — through the holographic map — to the a

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 13:50 UTC pith:X5SLHSEK

load-bearing objection A solid two-loop calculation with a clear sign inconsistency and an overreaching all-orders conjecture; worth refereeing, but the advertised cosmological conclusion is not secured. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2605.16587 v2 pith:X5SLHSEK submitted 2026-05-15 hep-th

3d QFT IR divergences as UV divergences in 4d Holographic Cosmology

Matheus Cravo , Horatiu Nastase This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 81T1381T1883F05 PACS 11.10.Gh04.60.-m98.80.Cq
keywords holographic cosmologygeneralized conformal structureinfrared divergencestwo-loop correlatorssuper-renormalizable QFTdomain wall/cosmology correspondencecosmological singularitymass deformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that the toy-model three-dimensional gauge-scalar theory used for holographic cosmology has no infrared log divergences in its two- and three-point correlators, once a finite scalar mass is introduced and the deep-IR limit q→0 is taken before the massless limit m→0. At two loops the log(q/m) terms cancel and the correlators saturate to constants that depend only on m and the coupling λ, with the perturbative parameter becoming λ/m; the authors argue the resulting series has the shape of 1/(m ± cλ), so that after resummation the massless limit exists and λ itself regulates the IR — an old conjecture on these super-renormalizable theories, now supported by explicit two-loop evidence and by lattice results. Under the holographic map of the domain-wall/cosmology correspondence, the same finiteness becomes UV finiteness of the dual 4d cosmological correlators at early times, i.e., the absence of a cosmological singularity. A sympathetic reader cares because this is a concrete perturbative route from a computable 3d field theory to a cosmological statement: no big-bang singularity in this holographic model.

Core claim

The central claim is that a mass deformation of the toy model for holographic cosmology — with the mass promoted to a background field so the generalized conformal structure survives — makes the deep infrared q ≪ m perturbatively accessible, and that at two loops all log(q/m) divergences cancel in the 2- and 3-point functions of the |Φ|² operator. The deep-IR two-point function saturates to ⟨OO⟩ ≃ 3N²/(4πm)(1 + πλ̃) (λ̃ = λ/4πm), independent of q at leading order, and the squeezed-limit three-point function to ≃ 3N²/(16πm³)(1 + λ/2π²m). The authors interpret the cancellation as evidence for nonperturbative IR finiteness — consistent with lattice results — and, through the holographic map, as

What carries the argument

The machinery is the mass deformation of the theory's generalized conformal structure together with the generalized dilatation Ward identities. By treating the scalar mass as a background field that transforms under dilatations, the authors derive a Ward identity ((2∆−3) − q∂_q − g²∂_{g²} − 2m²∂_{m²})G(q) = 0 that fixes the parametric form of the correlators; it shows that in the deep IR q²→0 the two-point function can only depend on the dimensionless combination g²/m through an arbitrary function K(g²/m), whose massless limit is finite only for special behaviours such as a geometric series 1/(1 ± cλ/m). The explicit two-loop evaluation — using Feynman-parameter integrals, integration-by-par

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the unproven assumption (Section 3.4, Eq. (1.7)) that the two-loop cancellation of logarithms continues at all orders and the λ/m series resums as a geometric series 1/(m ± cλ), so that the massless limit can be taken only after resummation — with the integrand-level squeezed limit for the three-point function (Section 4.1) as a second, structurally separate assumption.

What would settle it

A three-loop computation of the deep-IR two-point function (or a two-loop evaluation of the three-point function with full kinematics): if a log(q/m) term reappears at three loops, or the resumed series in λ/m deviates from the geometric form, the nonperturbative IR-finiteness claim — and with it the derived absence of a cosmological singularity — fails, while the explicit two-loop result would remain correct.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the two-loop cancellation persists to all orders, the deep-IR series resums to 1/(m ± cλ); taking m→0 only after resummation yields finite correlators ∝ 1/λ, so the coupling acts as a nonperturbative IR regulator.
  • The generalized dilatation Ward identities force the deep-IR correlators to be independent of q at leading order, with λ/m as the only effective expansion parameter; perturbation theory then remains valid for q ≪ λ whenever λ < m.
  • Through the holographic formulas, finiteness of ⟨OO⟩ at q→0 makes the late-time cosmological scalar power spectrum finite at small q (early times), which the authors identify with the absence of a cosmological singularity.
  • The squeezed-limit three-point cosmological correlator is also IR-finite and behaves as 1/λ̃² for q→0; a naive resummation would give a λ-independent result, while the correct all-orders limit may yield 1/N².
  • The same mass-deformed Ward-identity method applies to the broader class of super-renormalizable 3d theories used in holographic cosmology, not just to the specific toy model computed here.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the q→0-before-m→0 order of limits is the correct prescription, then the massless theory is defined by resummation rather than by the naive perturbative expansion; this is testable — lattice simulations at small bare mass could check whether correlators approach the 1/λ saturation or a divergent 1/m behaviour.
  • The mass-deformation technique is portable: any super-renormalizable 3d theory with generalized conformal structure becomes perturbatively explorable in the deep IR, so the three-point function away from the squeezed limit and higher-point correlators are now in principle accessible as further checks of the conjectured nonperturbative finiteness.
  • The paper's logic reverses the usual holographic direction of explanation: instead of using bulk regularity to constrain the dual field theory, it suggests that a purely field-theoretic IR-finiteness property (if confirmed) would be the mechanism that removes the cosmological singularity in this class of models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies IR divergences in a 3d scalar-gauge toy model for holographic cosmology, with a scalar mass term added in a way that preserves a generalized conformal structure. It computes the 2-point and squeezed-limit 3-point functions of the O=|Φ|^2 operator to two loops, for both massless and massive cases. The main claimed result is that in the deep IR (q<<m) the logarithmic IR divergences cancel through two loops, the correlators become q-independent, and the perturbative series behaves like a geometric series 1/(m+cλ), suggesting nonperturbative IR finiteness and, through the holographic map, the absence of cosmological singularities.

Significance. If the computations are correct, the two-loop cancellation of IR logarithms in a concrete super-renormalizable model is a valuable technical result, and the generalized Ward identities for the massive deformation provide a useful framework. The paper also demonstrates nontrivial integral evaluation (IBP reduction, Lerch-function asymptotics) and includes some numerical checks. However, the advertised nonperturbative and cosmological conclusions rest on an unproven all-orders resummation, and there are explicit inconsistencies in the deep-IR expansions and in the sign of the cosmological 2-point function. These issues must be fixed before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§1.1 vs §3.5 (Eq. (1.9) vs Eq. (3.118))] The main-result equation (1.9) quotes a positive deep-IR cosmological 2-point function, ⟨σ(q)σ(−q)⟩ ≃ 4m/(9N² λtilde_eff), while the actual derivation in Eq. (3.118) gives −4m/(9N² λtilde_eff). A negative power spectrum is not a standard healthy cosmological correlator, so the claimed interpretation of 'no cosmological singularity' is not secured even at the computed order. The sign in the holographic map or in the analytic continuation must be corrected and explained.
  2. [§3.3, Eq. (3.95)] The claimed deep-IR expansion ⟨OO⟩ ≃ (3N²/4πm)(1 + π λtilde_eff + O(qhat)) does not follow from the explicit two-loop result (3.93)–(3.94). For small qhat, f0(qhat) = 2qhat/π + O(qhat³) and f1(qhat) = 3qhat² + O(qhat⁴), so λ_eff f1 is O(λ qhat/m²) and vanishes in the q→0 limit. No O(λ/m) constant correction is present at two loops. This contradicts the quoted π λtilde_eff term and, more importantly, removes the two-loop support for the geometric-resummation ansatz (3.97). Please reconcile the expansion or show explicitly how the λ/m term is generated.
  3. [§4.3, Eq. (4.93)] The identity in Eq. (4.93) states (1 + λ/(2π²m)) = (1 + ½ λtilde_eff), but with λtilde_eff defined in (3.96) as λ/(4πm), the correct relation is λ/(2π²m) = (2/π) λtilde_eff, not ½ λtilde_eff. This is not a typo-level issue because the coefficient of the λ/m correction in the 3-point function is used to support the geometric-resummation claim. The derivation of the deep-IR 3-point expansion should be rechecked and presented consistently.
  4. [Secs. 3.4, 5 and Abstract] The nonperturbative IR-finiteness conclusion and the corresponding 'absence of cosmological singularities' are extrapolations beyond the computed order. The paper itself states that a three-loop calculation is future work and that the geometric behavior (3.97) is only 'suggested'. Thus the two-loop log-cancellation proves finiteness only to that order; it does not establish the all-orders resummation 1/(m±cλ), nor the massless limit after resummation. The abstract should be reworded to distinguish the proven two-loop statement from the conjectural nonperturbative statement, and the cosmological conclusion should be presented as conditional on that conjecture.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Multiple equations, e.g. (2.47)–(2.49), (4.95), (A.13)] There are several corrupted mathematical symbols (e.g. '/leftr⫯g⊸tl⫯ne→') and garbled insertions in Appendix A.2, Eq. (A.13). These make the derivations very hard to follow and should be cleaned up.
  2. [§3.2 and §4.2] Several nontrivial integrals are reported after 'Mathematica simplifications' with no code or detailed intermediate output (e.g. Eqs. (3.55), (3.62), (4.55)). Since these results are load-bearing, appending the relevant Mathematica notebook or providing explicit verification steps would substantially improve reproducibility.
  3. [Sec. 4 and Abstract] The 3-point function results are obtained only in the squeezed limit, with the soft limit taken at the integrand level. The abstract and conclusions should state this restriction explicitly; currently the abstract claims 3-point saturation without mentioning the kinematic limit.
  4. [Eq. (4.94)] The claimed relation between the squeezed-limit 3-point function and a derivative of the 2-point function is stated without derivation. Even if it is a check, its regime of validity and the origin of the subleading λ term should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No construction-level circularity: the two-loop IR cancellation is obtained from explicit diagrammatics; the all-orders geometric resummation is an openly conjectural extrapolation.

full rationale

The central two-loop results are computed directly from the Feynman rules: the 2-point function is assembled from explicit integrals I0-I5 (e.g. Eqs. (3.11), (3.63), (3.76), (3.82)) and the 3-point function from K0-K5 (e.g. Eqs. (4.15), (4.22), (4.35), (4.70), (4.89)); the q→0 saturation and cancellation of logarithms emerge from these integrals, not from the Ward identities. The generalized dilatation Ward identity (2.45)-(2.52) only fixes the functional form if the q→0 limit exists; the paper verifies existence by explicit calculation. The geometric-series ansatz (1.7)/(3.97) is explicitly presented as a suggestion ('This is indeed the type of behaviour we obtain up to 2-loops, suggesting that non-perturbatively, λ plays now the role of IR regulator'), and Sec. 5 defers a three-loop check; hence the nonperturbative claim is an extrapolation rather than a circular derivation. Self-citations [19,20,22] supply the toy-model action and the holographic dictionary, but they are not used to enforce the cancellation; they are external model input, not an output of this paper. The sign discrepancy between Eq. (1.9) and Eq. (3.118) is an internal consistency defect in the holographic translation, not a construction-level circularity. Overall, no step of the derivation is equivalent to its inputs by definition; the mild score reflects only the self-cited model/dictionary and the conjectural resummation step, neither of which is a fitted-input-as-prediction circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The central results depend on three model/scheme parameters (lambda, m, nu) inherited or chosen by hand, on quantum validity of the generalized Ward identities, on the holographic map, on the unproven geometric resummation, and on the integrand-level squeezed limit for the 3-point function.

free parameters (3)
  • scalar mass m
    Introduced as an IR regulator and then promoted to a fixed mass; not fitted to data, but the deep-IR results depend on it and the massless limit is taken only after a conjectured resummation.
  • 't Hooft coupling lambda
    Model input inherited from the toy model and prior holographic-cosmology fits; not fitted in this paper, but it sets the effective couplings lambda/q and lambda/m.
  • dimensional-regularization parameter nu = 1
    Choice d=3+nu*epsilon; nu=1 is chosen 'for simplicity' in Sec. 3.2.2 to handle the massless I2 pole; it is a scheme choice, not a physical parameter.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The mass deformation preserves generalized conformal structure when the mass is promoted to a background field transforming as a scalar (Sec. 2.2-2.3).
    Everything about the massive Ward identities and the use of m as a finite scale rather than a pure regulator rests on this symmetry statement; quantum anomalies are not analyzed.
  • domain assumption The path-integral measure is invariant under the generalized conformal transformations, so the Ward identities (2.38)-(2.41) hold at the quantum level.
    Standard assumption in deriving Ward identities, but in this non-conformal generalized setting it is not separately proven.
  • ad hoc to paper The nonperturbative IR-finiteness argument assumes the two-loop log-cancellation continues at all orders and the lambda/m series resums as a geometric series (Sec. 3.4, Eq. (1.7)).
    Stated as a conjecture, not proven; load-bearing for the abstract's claim of IR finiteness beyond perturbation theory.
  • domain assumption The domain-wall/cosmology correspondence and the analytic continuation qbar -> -iq, Nbar^2 -> -N^2 (Eq. 2.6) map QFT correlators to late-time cosmological correlators.
    This holographic map is imported from previous work and not re-derived; it carries the interpretation of IR finiteness as absence of a cosmological singularity.
  • domain assumption The squeezed limit delta -> 0 taken at the integrand level for the 3-point function (Sec. 4.1) is equivalent to the full squeezed limit for the deep-IR behavior.
    The authors justify this via expansion by regions, but it remains an extra kinematic assumption; the full 3-point function with the limit taken at the end is left for future work.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 60448 in / 16288 out tokens · 142394 ms · 2026-08-02T13:50:25.410561+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we consider IR divergences in a 3d toy model field theory for 4d holographic cosmology, and we analyze them by introducing a mass term in a way that preserves a certain form of the generalized conformal structure. This allows us to compute 2- and 3-point functions at 2-loops and study their IR structure below the mass scale, from which we argue for a possible IR finiteness beyond perturbation theory, consistent with lattice results. In the holographically dual 4d cosmology, this corresponds to UV finiteness, i.e., the absence of cosmological singularities. The 3d IR field theory methods could be extended beyond this specific application.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16587 by Horatiu Nastase, Matheus Cravo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The five diagrams that contribute for the correlator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two-loop diagrams contributing to ⟨Φ 2 (q¯1), Φ 2 (q¯2), Φ 2 (q¯3). 4.2.1 Chain-type triangle diagrams There are three variants of the chain-type diagram, corresponding to attaching a 1-loop two-point bubble to one of the three external vertices of the triangle diagram K0 using a quartic vertex. These variations are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Three variants of the chain-type diagram for the three-point function. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Three independent diagrams that contribute to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Three independent diagrams contributing to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Variants of the K3 diagram. 4.2.5 Gauge-exchange between internal scalar lines The three variants of the K3 diagram are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_6.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cross-Correlations of Metric and Monopole Perturbations from Holographic Cosmology

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    At 1-loop in holographic cosmology, f_NL^{ξÃÃ}=0 while the angle-averaged f_NL^{γÃÃ}=6, from a full ⟨TJJ⟩ computation including contact terms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 27 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,”Conf. Proc.C930308 (1993) 284–296,arXiv:gr-qc/9310026 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  2. [2]

    The World as a hologram,

    L. Susskind, “The World as a hologram,”J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396, arXiv:hep-th/9409089 [hep-th]. 68

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113–1133,arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]. [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    Nastase,Introduction to the ADS/CFT Correspondence

    H. Nastase,Introduction to the ADS/CFT Correspondence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015

    2015

  5. [5]

    Ammon and J

    M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger,Gauge/gravity duality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015

    2015

  6. [6]

    Quantum gravity in de Sitter space,

    E. Witten, “Quantum gravity in de Sitter space,” inStrings 2001: International Conference Mumbai, India, January 5-10, 2001. 2001.arXiv:hep-th/0106109 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    The dS / CFT correspondence,

    A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,”JHEP10(2001) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0106113

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Inflation and the dS / CFT correspondence,

    A. Strominger, “Inflation and the dS / CFT correspondence,”JHEP11(2001) 049, arXiv:hep-th/0110087

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  9. [10]

    On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,

    J. M. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, “On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,”JHEP09(2011) 045,arXiv:1104.2846 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  10. [11]

    Holography for Cosmology,

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, “Holography for Cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 021301,arXiv:0907.5542 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [12]

    The Holographic Universe,

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, “The Holographic Universe,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 222(2010) 012007,arXiv:1001.2007 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [15]

    Constraining holographic cosmology using Planck data,

    N. Afshordi, E. Gould, and K. Skenderis, “Constraining holographic cosmology using Planck data,”Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no. 12, 123505,arXiv:1703.05385 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [16]

    How Superrenormalizable Interactions Cure their Infrared Divergences ,

    R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, “How Superrenormalizable Interactions Cure their Infrared Divergences ,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2291

    1981

  14. [17]

    High-Temperature Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,

    T. Appelquist and R. D. Pisarski, “High-Temperature Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2305. 69

    1981

  15. [18]

    Nonperturbative Infrared Finiteness in a Superrenormalizable Scalar Quantum Field Theory,

    G. Cossu, L. Del Debbio, A. Juttner, B. Kitching-Morley, J. K. L. Lee, A. Portelli, H. B. Rocha, and K. Skenderis, “Nonperturbative Infrared Finiteness in a Superrenormalizable Scalar Quantum Field Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no. 22, 221601,arXiv:2009.14768 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [19]

    Holography for the very early Universe and the classic puzzles of Hot Big Bang cosmology,

    H. N˘ astase and K. Skenderis, “Holography for the very early Universe and the classic puzzles of Hot Big Bang cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no. 2, 021901, arXiv:1904.05821 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [20]

    Holographic cosmology solutions of problems with pre-inflationary cosmology,

    H. N˘ astase, “Holographic cosmology solutions of problems with pre-inflationary cosmology,”JHEP12(2020) 026,arXiv:2008.05630 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [21]

    The monopole problem in holographic cosmology,

    H. N˘ astase and U. M. Portugal, “The monopole problem in holographic cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136141,arXiv:2012.14829 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [22]

    3-point function of currents for holographic cosmology and monopole non-gaussianities,

    M. Cravo and H. Nastase, “3-point function of currents for holographic cosmology and monopole non-gaussianities,”Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024) no. 5, 1–50

    2024

  20. [23]

    Topology of cosmic domains and strings,

    T. W. Kibble, “Topology of cosmic domains and strings,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9(1976) no. 8, 1387–1398

    1976

  21. [24]

    Some implications of a cosmological phase transition,

    T. W. Kibble, “Some implications of a cosmological phase transition,”Physics Reports67(1980) no. 1, 183–199

    1980

  22. [25]

    Supergravity and the large n limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,

    N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Supergravity and the large n limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,”Physical Review D58 (1998) no. 4, 046004

    1998

  23. [26]

    Space-time uncertainty principle and conformal symmetry in d-particle dynamics,

    A. Jevicki and T. Yoneya, “Space-time uncertainty principle and conformal symmetry in d-particle dynamics,”Nuclear Physics B535(1998) no. 1-2, 335–348

    1998

  24. [27]

    Generalized conformal symmetry in d-brane matrix models,

    A. Jevicki, Y. Kazama, and T. Yoneya, “Generalized conformal symmetry in d-brane matrix models,”Physical Review D59(1999) no. 6, 066001

    1999

  25. [28]

    Precision holography for non-conformal branes,

    I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, “Precision holography for non-conformal branes,”Journal of High Energy Physics2008(2008) no. 09, 094

    2008

  26. [29]

    The holographic universe,

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, “The holographic universe,” inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing. 2010

    2010

  27. [30]

    Renormalisation of ir divergences and holography in de sitter,

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Renormalisation of ir divergences and holography in de sitter,”Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024) no. 5, 1–85

    2024

  28. [31]

    Scalar one-loop integrals,

    M. Veltmanet al., “Scalar one-loop integrals,”Nuclear Physics B153(1979) 365–401. 70

    1979

  29. [32]

    Recursive algorithm for evaluating vertex-type feynman integrals,

    A. I. Davydychev, “Recursive algorithm for evaluating vertex-type feynman integrals,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General25(1992) no. 21, 5587

    1992

  30. [33]

    One-loop three-point feynman integrals with appell f 1 hypergeometric functions,

    K. H. Phan and D. T. Tran, “One-loop three-point feynman integrals with appell f 1 hypergeometric functions,”Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2019 (2019) no. 6, 063B01

    2019

  31. [34]

    Massless and massive one-loop three-point functions in negative dimensional approach,

    A. Suzuki, E. Santos, and A. Schmidt, “Massless and massive one-loop three-point functions in negative dimensional approach,”The European Physical Journal C-Particles and Fields26(2002) no. 1, 125–137

    2002

  32. [35]

    Two-point function at two loops via triangle diagram insertion,

    A. T. Suzuki, A. GM Schmidt, and J. D. Bolzan, “Two-point function at two loops via triangle diagram insertion,”Journal of the Physical Society of Japan81(2012) no. 4, 044101

    2012

  33. [36]

    Non-gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,

    J. Maldacena, “Non-gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,”Journal of High Energy Physics2003(2003) no. 05, 013–013, arXiv:astro-ph/0210603 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  34. [37]

    Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function,

    P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga, “Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function,”JCAP10(2004) 006,arXiv:astro-ph/0407059

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  35. [38]

    J. Z. Finotti, M. Cravo, and H. Nastase,To appear.2026

    2026

  36. [39]

    Foundation and generalization of the expansion by regions,

    B. Jantzen, “Foundation and generalization of the expansion by regions,”Journal of High Energy Physics2011(2011) no. 12, 76

    2011

  37. [40]

    Asymptotic expansion of feynman integrals near threshold,

    M. Beneke and V. A. Smirnov, “Asymptotic expansion of feynman integrals near threshold,”Nuclear Physics B522(1998) no. 1-2, 321–344

    1998

  38. [41]

    V. A. Smirnov,Evaluating feynman integrals, vol. 211. Springer, 2004

    2004

  39. [42]

    Lectures on qed and qcd,

    A. Grozin, “Lectures on qed and qcd,”arXiv preprint hep-ph/0508242(2005)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  40. [43]

    A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,

    F. V. Tkachov, “A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,”Physics Letters B100(1981) no. 1, 65–68

    1981

  41. [44]

    Integration by parts: the algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops,

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov, “Integration by parts: the algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops,”Nuclear Physics B192(1981) no. 1, 159–204

    1981

  42. [45]

    Polylogarithms and associated functions,

    L. Lewin, “Polylogarithms and associated functions,”(No Title)(1981)

    1981

  43. [46]

    The dilogarithm function, frontiers in number theory, physics, and geometry. ii, 3–65,

    D. Zagier, “The dilogarithm function, frontiers in number theory, physics, and geometry. ii, 3–65,”

  44. [47]

    The dilogarithm function for complex argument,

    L. C. Maximon, “The dilogarithm function for complex argument,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences459(2003) no. 2039, 2807–2819. 71

    2003

  45. [48]

    The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon,

    R. Brout, F. Englert, and E. Gunzig, “The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon,”Annals Phys.115(1978) 78

    1978

  46. [49]

    The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,

    S. W. Hawking, “The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295

    1982

  47. [50]

    Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, “Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1110–1113

    1982

  48. [51]

    Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,”JETP Lett.30(1979) 682–685

    1979

  49. [52]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,”Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99–102

    1980

  50. [53]

    A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,

    A. D. Linde, “A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,”Physics Letters B108(1982) no. 6, 389–393

    1982

  51. [54]

    N˘ astase,Cosmology and string theory, vol

    H. N˘ astase,Cosmology and string theory, vol. 197. Springer, 2019

    2019

  52. [55]

    Planck 2018 results,

    N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, and et al., “Planck 2018 results,”Astronomy & Astrophysics641(2020) ,arXiv:1807.06205 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [56]

    Trans-Planckian Issues for Inflationary Cosmology,

    R. H. Brandenberger and J. Martin, “Trans-Planckian Issues for Inflationary Cosmology,”Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 113001,arXiv:1211.6753 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [57]

    Robustness of the inflationary perturbation spectrum to transPlanckian physics,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “Robustness of the inflationary perturbation spectrum to transPlanckian physics,”Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.73(2001) 415–418, arXiv:astro-ph/0104043

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [58]

    A critical review of inflation,

    N. Turok, “A critical review of inflation,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 3449–3467

    2002

  56. [59]

    Inflationary cosmology: Progress and problems,

    R. H. Brandenberger, “Inflationary cosmology: Progress and problems,” Astrophysics and Space Science Library247(2000) 169–212

    2000

  57. [60]

    Large-order Perturbation Theory and de Sitter/Anti de Sitter Effective Actions,

    A. K. Das and G. V. Dunne, “Large-order Perturbation Theory and de Sitter/Anti de Sitter Effective Actions,”Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 044029, arXiv:hep-th/0607168

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  58. [61]

    de sitter holography and the cosmic microwave background,

    F. Larsen, J. P. Van Der Schaar, and R. G. Leigh, “de sitter holography and the cosmic microwave background,”Journal of High Energy Physics2002(2002) no. 04, 047

    2002

  59. [62]

    Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman, and A. Strominger, “Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,”Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) no. 1, 015009, arXiv:1108.5735 [hep-th]. 72

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [63]

    On de sitter spacetime and string theory,

    P. Berglund, T. H¨ ubsch, and D. Minic, “On de sitter spacetime and string theory,” International Journal of Modern Physics D32(2023) no. 09, 2330002

    2023

  61. [64]

    ads/cf ttods/cf t: Some recent developments,

    G. Yadav, “ads/cf ttods/cf t: Some recent developments,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02852(2026)

    arXiv 2026

  62. [65]

    The ads/cft correspondence,

    V. E. Hubeny, “The ads/cft correspondence,”Classical and Quantum Gravity32 (2015) no. 12, 124010

    2015

  63. [66]

    Supersymmetric gauge theories and the ads/cft correspondence (tasi 2001 lecture notes),

    E. D’Hoker and D. Z. Freedman, “Supersymmetric gauge theories and the ads/cft correspondence (tasi 2001 lecture notes),”arXiv preprint hep-th/0201253(2002)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  64. [67]

    Review of ads/cft integrability: an overview,

    N. Beisert, C. Ahn, L. F. Alday, Z. Bajnok, J. M. Drummond, L. Freyhult, N. Gromov, R. A. Janik, V. Kazakov, T. Klose,et al., “Review of ads/cft integrability: an overview,”Letters in Mathematical Physics99(2012) no. 1, 3–32

    2012

  65. [68]

    Constraining holographic inflation with wmap,

    R. Easther, R. Flauger, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Constraining holographic inflation with wmap,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2011(2011) no. 09, 030–030,arXiv:1104.2040 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  66. [69]

    From planck data to planck era: Observational tests of holographic cosmology,

    N. Afshordi, C. Coriano, L. Delle Rose, E. Gould, and K. Skenderis, “From planck data to planck era: Observational tests of holographic cosmology,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(2017) no. 4, ,arXiv:1607.04878 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [70]

    Holographic predictions for cosmological 3-point functions,

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Holographic predictions for cosmological 3-point functions,”JHEP03(2012) 091,arXiv:1112.1967 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  68. [71]

    Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Theories,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Theories,” in17th International Conference on High-Energy Physics, pp. III.84–85. 1974

    1974

  69. [72]

    SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry,

    E. Witten, “SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry,” inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan, pp. 1173–1200. 7, 2003. arXiv:hep-th/0307041

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  70. [73]

    Particle-vortex and maxwell duality in the ads4×cp3/abjm correspondence,

    J. Murugan, H. Nastase, N. Rughoonauth, and J. P. Shock, “Particle-vortex and maxwell duality in the ads4×cp3/abjm correspondence,”Journal of High Energy Physics2014(2014) no. 10, 1–28

    2014

  71. [74]

    The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. Maldacena, “The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” International journal of theoretical physics38(1999) no. 4, 1113–1133

    1999

  72. [75]

    N˘ astase,Cosmology and String Theory, vol

    H. N˘ astase,Cosmology and String Theory, vol. 197 ofFundamental Theories of Physics. Springer, 2019. 73

    2019