Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 cited by

Natural language is the action interface that finally lets interactive video world models control multiple entities at once and transfer actions across them.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 18:51 UTC pith:JT2CNRU6

load-bearing objection Real multi-entity shared-camera control via per-frame NL slots, with careful three-axis eval; the Action-Index gap is partly confounded by text-encoder capacity but the system still stands. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2605.18601 v2 pith:JT2CNRU6 submitted 2026-05-18 cs.CV

Incantation: Natural Language as the Action Interface for Multi-Entity Video World Models

classification cs.CV
keywords interactive video world modelsnatural language action interfacemulti-entity controlcross-entity transfervideo diffusionreal-time streamingper-frame conditioningaction control accuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Interactive video world models can look cinematic yet still fail at a basic multiplayer job: independently steering several characters under one shared camera, and moving a move from one character to another. This paper argues the bottleneck is the action interface itself—animation IDs, device inputs, and scene captions bind meaning to specific entities or engines at design time. Incantation replaces those protocols with natural language at every 0.25-second latent frame, giving each entity its own isolated prompt slot. On Elden Ring combat, it transfers exclusive boss moves across characters at 89% accuracy versus 43% for an action-index baseline, handles rephrased out-of-vocabulary prompts at 90% versus 0%, and after distillation streams for hours near 20 FPS. The same architecture and recipe work on King of Fighters after changing only the per-entity vocabulary slots.

Core claim

The paper’s central claim is that natural language is the first action interface for multi-entity interactive video that jointly supplies open-vocabulary semantics and per-entity addressability. Conditioning a video world model at every latent frame with syntactically isolated entity prompts enables simultaneous multi-entity control under a shared viewpoint and concept-level cross-entity transfer—synthesizing both motion and visual concept on an entity that never performed the action in training—capabilities that discrete action indices, device inputs, and scene-level captions cannot deliver by construction.

What carries the argument

Per-frame language-conditioned attention: full bidirectional self-attention is kept over history frames to preserve pretrained video priors, while text cross-attention is restricted only to the noisy target frame so each action prompt steers its own timestep without contaminating committed history. Real-time long-horizon streaming comes from ODE-initialized Self-Forcing distillation plus a RoPE-decoupled sliding KV-cache that keeps memory and positions bounded.

Load-bearing premise

The large measured gaps rest on treating a joint-vocabulary action-index baseline as a fair stand-in for discrete control interfaces, even though natural language also brings extra pretrained capacity and an open input space the index model cannot match.

What would settle it

Retrain both interfaces on the same hybrid Margit–Crucible Knight data with capacity matched as closely as possible, then re-run the five cross-entity action pairs and four single-word OOV probes under the same blinded Action Control Accuracy protocol; if the action-index system closes the 89% vs 43% and 90% vs 0% gaps, the structural interface claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Multi-entity interactive worlds no longer need a separate hand-designed action vocabulary for every character and every engine.
  • Cross-entity and cross-world transfer reduce to prompt wording and vocabulary-slot substitution rather than architecture redesign.
  • Concept-level action transfer becomes a measurable modeling target instead of something rendering pipelines cannot express.
  • The same recipe can be reapplied to visually unrelated games (shown on King of Fighters) with only per-entity action slots changed.
  • Real-time multi-hour playable rollouts remain compatible with the language interface after two-step distillation (~19.7 FPS at 480p).

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the interface only consumes per-entity captions, the same slots could be filled by VLM auto-labels or robot logs, turning game-memory supervision into a temporary testbed rather than a permanent requirement.
  • A hybrid controller that keeps language for discrete semantics and adds a parallel continuous channel for camera pose or force would follow directly from the paper’s own limitation note without redesigning the attention pattern.
  • If compositional text is doing the real work, a frozen text-initialized entity×action table should recover most of the cross-entity gap while still scoring zero on true OOV—exactly the collapse the appendix sketches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper argues that the main bottleneck in multi-entity interactive video world models is the action interface: animation IDs, device inputs, and scene captions bind semantics to entities or engines and lack either open-vocabulary composition or per-entity addressability. It proposes natural language as a per-latent-frame (0.25 s), per-entity interface and presents Incantation, built on Wan 2.2 with bidirectional history self-attention, noisy-target-only text cross-attention, ODE-initialized Self-Forcing distillation, and a RoPE-decoupled sliding KV-cache. On Elden Ring combat data with engine-memory labels, a natural-language model beats a joint-vocabulary Action-Index baseline on cross-entity transfer (89% vs 43% ACA) and OOV prompts (90% vs 0%), while a 2-step student runs at 19.7 FPS with stable FVD over multi-hour rollouts; the same recipe is replicated on KOF by swapping action-vocabulary slots. A dataset preview is released.

Significance. If the interface claim holds, this is a clear contribution for interactive video world models: it identifies a structural limitation of prior control protocols, demonstrates simultaneous multi-entity control under one shared viewpoint (underserved in prior work), and shows concept-level cross-entity transfer and OOV coverage that discrete interfaces cannot express by construction. The systems package is substantial—architecture ablations (Table 5, Fig. 9), long-horizon FVD stability (Table 11), real-time pipeline with TAEHV (Table 13), blinded human ACA with inter-rater and McNemar support (App. A.7), and a carefully labeled multi-world gaming dataset. These are concrete, reproducible strengths even if the attribution of the Axis-2 gap needs tightening.

major comments (3)
  1. The central interface claim for Axis 2 is not fully isolated from capacity. §4.1 states that NL uses the pretrained text encoder into decoupled cross-attention while Action-Index uses a learnable linear projection of a joint one-hot, and explicitly calls the capacity asymmetry “inherent.” Appendix A.10 argues that frozen text-initialized factorized tables collapse into restricted NL and trainable ones revert to the joint-index baseline, but this is an argument, not an experiment. Without a controlled capacity-matched discrete baseline (e.g., frozen CLIP/Qwen/Wan embeddings over the closed joint vocabulary, or a trainable embedding table of comparable size and initialization), the 89% vs 43% cross-entity gap (Table 1 / Table 8) remains confounded between “compositional interface protocol” and “open-vocabulary encoder prior.” Axis 3 OOV (0% by construction for Action-Index) is structural;
  2. The “concept-level” cross-entity claim is stronger than the score distributions support on some tiers. The introduction and abstract claim the model must synthesize both motion and visual concept on an entity with no recording of the action. In Table 8, Tier II (Tail of the crucible on Margit) is 20/70/10 for NL—mostly partial—and the VLM judge is chance (Table 9). Tier I is stronger (65% full), but the paper should qualify “concept-level transfer” by tier (full vs partial execution, motion-only vs style transfer) rather than reporting a single 89% mean that mixes regimes of very different visual difficulty.
  3. External video baselines in Figure 5 / Table 2 are informative for visual quality but weak for the multi-entity control claim. Seedance 2.0 and LongLive are not interactive multi-entity world models; low trajectory-conditioned ACA is expected under mismatched interfaces and training. The manuscript correctly notes that no prior world model supports independent simultaneous multi-entity control in one holistic scene (Table 3). The fair comparison is therefore NL vs Action-Index under matched backbone and data; the commercial-model rows should be clearly labeled as qualitative / non-interactive references so they do not appear to support the interface superiority claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical systems paper: interface claims rest on held-out human ACA/FVD, not on identities that force the reported gaps by definition.

full rationale

Incantation’s load-bearing claims (cross-entity ACA 89% vs 43%, OOV 90% vs 0%, real-time 2-step student, KOF vocabulary-only transfer) are experimental measurements under fixed protocols, not first-principles derivations. Training labels are read from engine memory independently of the model; ACA is blinded human median rating on held-out rollouts; FVD uses I3D against held-out clips. The OOV Action-Index score of 0% is acknowledged as structural (no input slot outside the fixed vocabulary), which is a stated interface property rather than a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. Self-citations (e.g. Matrix-Game / The Matrix) appear only as related work and do not underwrite uniqueness theorems or force the evaluation outcomes. Appendix A.10’s argument that stronger Action-Index variants collapse into NL is reasoning, not a circular reduction of the measured gaps. Capacity asymmetry between the pretrained text encoder and the one-hot linear baseline is a fairness/confound concern, not circularity. No self-definitional equations, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain was found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central interface claim rests on standard ML practice plus a few domain choices: games as the only practical source of frame-accurate multi-entity labels; a pretrained video backbone and text encoder as carriers of motion/language priors; and human ACA as the primary success measure. Free parameters are ordinary training/inference knobs (context length, RoPE cap, distillation steps). No new physical entities are postulated; the main invented constructs are architectural (decoupled per-frame text attention, RoPE-decoupled KV sliding) and the structured multi-entity prompt template.

free parameters (5)
  • Recent context length Kr = 7
    Number of recent clean latent frames in the Sink+Recent+Noisy window; set to 7 (~1.75 s) and ablated but chosen by hand for training/inference alignment.
  • Local RoPE position cap C = 16 (ablation); 12 (timing table)
    Largest local rotary index allowed under sliding inference; chosen to keep positions in the training range (e.g., C≥Kr, reported configs use 16 or 12).
  • Stage-1 / distillation learning rates and step counts = lr 2e-5/1e-5; ODE 5e-6; SF 2e-6
    Curriculum (1k warmup + 50k fine-tune), ODE init (1k steps), Self-Forcing (15k steps) and associated LRs are hand-chosen training schedule parameters the reported quality depends on.
  • Student denoising steps = 2
    Inference collapsed to 2 steps via Self-Forcing; real-time FPS and FVD claims depend on this operating point.
  • Prompt-injection warm-up duration = 2 seconds
    Fixed 2 s unconditioned warm-up before target action injection for Axes 1–3; not searched, but shapes measured ACA.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Natural language shares action semantics across entities by construction, so a phrase can request a move on an entity that never performed it in training.
    Stated in the introduction and §3 as the core interface property enabling concept-level cross-entity transfer.
  • domain assumption Games with engine-memory instrumentation are a valid testbed for multi-entity interactive video world models because they supply zero-offset per-entity action labels at interactive rates.
    §4.1 and Appendix A.6; authors treat this as a testbed choice orthogonal to the interface, but all main results depend on it.
  • domain assumption Preserving bidirectional self-attention over history retains useful pretrained Wan 2.2 spatio-temporal priors better than imposing global causal masking.
    §3.1 and Appendix A.8 ablation; underpins the Stage-1 architecture choice.
  • ad hoc to paper Blinded human Action Control Accuracy on a 0/1/2 ordinal scale is an adequate primary metric for compositional action steering in this nascent task.
    §4.1 admits no established automated protocol; all headline 89%/90% claims rest on this metric choice.
  • ad hoc to paper A joint-vocabulary one-hot Action-Index model is a steel-man of discrete animation-ID / device-input interfaces for fair comparison.
    §4.1; used to interpret cross-entity and OOV gaps as structural rather than access failures.
  • standard math Standard diffusion / flow-matching training and Self-Forcing distillation mathematics apply without modification to this conditioning setup.
    ODE consistency loss (Eq. 1) and Self-Forcing follow cited prior work [27, 23].
invented entities (3)
  • Per-entity parallel natural-language action slots at 0.25 s granularity independent evidence
    purpose: Provide simultaneous independent control of multiple entities under one shared prompt template and camera.
    Core interface construct of the paper; not a physical entity but a new control protocol relative to cited world models.
  • Frame-local (noisy-target-only) text cross-attention on a bidirectional history backbone independent evidence
    purpose: Steer each latent frame with its own action text without destroying pretrained priors or contaminating committed history.
    Architectural invention validated by 2×2 ablation in Appendix A.8.
  • RoPE-decoupled sliding KV-cache (cache raw keys, apply RoPE on the fly) independent evidence
    purpose: Enable bounded-memory long-horizon streaming without stale positional embeddings after eviction.
    Inference mechanism in §3.2; ablated in Appendix A.9 for long-horizon FVD.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 33355 in / 4118 out tokens · 44301 ms · 2026-07-14T18:51:45.362526+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern interactive video world models have achieved impressive visual fidelity, yet lack fine-grained multi-entity control and cross-entity, cross-world generalization. We trace this gap to the action interface: standard control protocols (e.g. animation IDs, device inputs, scene-level captions) bind action semantics to specific entities or engines at design time. We propose natural language as the interface to unlock expressiveness that no prior interface can achieve, and we present Incantation, the first interactive video world model with per-latent-frame (0.25 s) natural-language conditioning that supports simultaneous multi-entity control and concept-level cross-entity transfer beyond any fixed rendering pipeline. We pair a pretrained bidirectional video backbone with frame-local text cross-attention, and enable real-time long-horizon streaming through ODE-initialized Self-Forcing distillation with a RoPE-decoupled sliding KV-cache. We surpass the Action-Index baseline on cross-entity transfer (89% vs. 43%) and out-of-vocabulary prompts (90% vs. 0%), and our 2-step student sustains 19.7 FPS at 480p with stable FVD over 2-hour rollouts. We further apply the same architecture and training recipe to The King of Fighters, changing only the per-entity action vocabulary slots. We have released a preview subset of the Incantation dataset at https://huggingface.co/datasets/zhush/incantation-elden-ring-scenes, containing manually collected Elden Ring player-boss combat clips with structured action-oriented metadata. Larger-scale Elden Ring and KOF data will be released with the full project.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18601 by Fan Cheng, Huangji Wang, Jian Zhao, Qianyu Peng, Ruili Feng, Shangwen Zhu, Xiangrui Ke, Xinyu Cui, Yeying Jin, Zeqing Wang, Zhaohu Xing, Zhao Pu, Zhilei Shu, Zian Zheng, Zizhao Tong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Demonstrations of Incantation’s cross-entity action transfer and multi-entity control in the game Elden Ring. (i) Two bosses, Margit and Crucible Knight, each possessing character￾exclusive moves, are conditioned via natural language to perform each other’s actions, each executed by both its native character and the other: Light Blade Attack (Margit-exclusive, green rows) and Tail of the Crucible (Crucible… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Workflow of Incantation. Left: Incantation translates combatant keyboard inputs into natural language prompts and autoregressively generates video frames in a causal streaming manner. Right: Training proceeds in two stages: (1) Language-Conditioned Pretraining adapts the base model for per-frame text-driven generation; (2) ODE-Initialized Self-Forcing Distillation enables real-time streaming via ODE-based … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Demonstrations of fine-grained multi-entity action control of Incantation in KOF. Incantation precisely responds to rapid action inputs and successfully captures actions as brief as 0.25 s (e.g., Punching), demonstrating its fine-grained and responsive control capability. 2 Related Work Interactive Video World Models. Most interactive video world models still simulate only a single controllable entity. Fol… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Attention design. Bidirectional self-attention is retained over history frames to preserve the spatio-temporal priors of the pretrained base model. Action cross-attention is restricted exclusively to the noisy target frame, preventing temporal cross-contamination. Together, these two constraints improve per-frame controllability without degrading generation quality. solution for each, structuring our pipel… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison of Incantation against leading video generation models on Elden Ring. Seedance 2.0 [33] and Kling 3.0 [24] achieve high visual fidelity yet fail on fine-grained player–boss interactions; LongLive [45] partially captures multi-entity dynamics but loses action fidelity and visual coherence. Only Incantation delivers precise per-frame multi-entity action control with genuine interactive… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Elden Ring rollout from a continuous Margit session. We show 40 frames sampled from the generated stream starting at the 1-minute mark. The sequence illustrates long-horizon visual stability and fine-grained player–boss interaction in a complex 3D adversarial scene. Environment: Stormveil Castle bridge, overcast sky, cinematic combat. Agents: Player (Greatsword user) vs. Boss (Margit, the Fell Omen). Playe… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: KOF rollout under the same architecture and training recipe. We show 30 frames from a KOF rollout. The sequence illustrates that the same per-entity language-conditioning recipe also supports visually distinct 2D fighting gameplay. • 4.00 s – 5.00 s: Jump back to disengage • 5.00 s – 7.50 s: Jump and mid-air slam • 7.50 s – 9.00 s: Tail swipe • 9.00 s – 10.00 s: Horizontal slash Since the three commercial … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Annotation interface for the human evaluation of Action Control Accuracy (ACA). Each trial presents the annotators with a generated video clip alongside the per-entity target action label (here: KYO—Light kick; YURI—Blocking). We strip conditioning-variant identities (NL vs. Action-Index) and prompt-source labels before rating, which ensures a fully blinded evaluation. Each annotator rates each entity’s ac… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Stage 1 ablation: FVD vs. training steps. Companion to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ShadowDancer: Teaching Video World Models Any Action by Learning Unified Dynamics Representations from a Video and Its Shadow

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Cross-shadow prediction on appearance-resampled video pairs yields a unified latent dynamics interface that transfers demonstrated actions across environments better than prior latent-action and interactive world models.

  2. StatePlay: State-Aware Game World Models for Mechanics-Consistent Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Coupling explicit state prediction with MoT-style video generation raises mechanics fidelity of Street Fighter 3 rollouts by about 18.6% over stateless game world models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 16 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    COMBAT: Conditional world models for behavioral agent training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00825, 2026

    Anmol Agarwal, Pranay Meshram, Sumer Singh, Saurav Suman, Andrew Lapp, Shahbuland Matiana, Louis Castricato, and Spencer Frazier. COMBAT: Conditional world models for behavioral agent training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00825, 2026

  2. [2]

    Diffusion for world modeling: Visual details matter in Atari

    Eloi Alonso, Adam Jelley, Vincent Micheli, Anssi Kanervisto, Amos Storkey, Tim Pearce, and François Fleuret. Diffusion for world modeling: Visual details matter in Atari. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2024

  3. [3]

    Logic-guided vector fields for constrained generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02009, 2026

    Ali Baheri. Logic-guided vector fields for constrained generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02009, 2026

  4. [4]

    Qwen technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023

    Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. Qwen technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023

  5. [5]

    Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025

    Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, Xionghui Chen, Zesen Cheng, Lianghao Deng, Wei Ding, Chang Gao, Chunjiang Ge, et al. Qwen3-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025

  6. [6]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Do- minik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, Varun Jampani, and Robin Rombach. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

  7. [7]

    Taehv: Tiny autoencoder for hunyuan video

    Ollin Boer Bohan. Taehv: Tiny autoencoder for hunyuan video. https://github.com/ madebyollin/taehv, 2025

  8. [8]

    Genie: Generative interactive environments

    Jake Bruce, Michael Dennis, Ashley Edwards, Jack Parker-Holder, Yuge Shi, Edward Hughes, Matthew Lai, Aditi Mavalankar, Richie Steigerwald, Chris Apps, et al. Genie: Generative interactive environments. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2024

  9. [9]

    GameGen-X: Interactive open-world game video generation

    Haoxuan Che, Xuanhua He, Quande Liu, Cheng Jin, and Hao Chen. GameGen-X: Interactive open-world game video generation. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025

  10. [10]

    Christopher, Michael Cardei, Jinhao Liang, and Ferdinando Fioretto

    Jacob K. Christopher, Michael Cardei, Jinhao Liang, and Ferdinando Fioretto. Neuro-symbolic generative diffusion models for physically grounded, robust, and safe generation. InProceedings of the International Conference on Neuro-Symbolic Systems, volume 288 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 188–213. PMLR, 2025

  11. [11]

    Oasis: A universe in a transformer

    Decart AI and Etched AI. Oasis: A universe in a transformer. https://oasis-model. github.io/, 2024. 10

  12. [12]

    LiveWorld: Simulating out-of-sight dynamics in generative video world models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.07145, 2026

    Zicheng Duan, Jiatong Xia, Zeyu Zhang, Wenbo Zhang, Gengze Zhou, Chenhui Gou, Yefei He, Feng Chen, Xinyu Zhang, and Lingqiao Liu. LiveWorld: Simulating out-of-sight dynamics in generative video world models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.07145, 2026

  13. [13]

    The matrix: Infinite-horizon world generation with real-time moving control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03568, 2024

    Ruili Feng, Han Zhang, Zhantao Yang, Jie Xiao, Zhilei Shu, Zhiheng Liu, Andy Zheng, Yukun Huang, Yu Liu, and Hongyang Zhang. The matrix: Infinite-horizon world generation with real-time moving control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03568, 2024

  14. [14]

    Artur d’Avila Garcez and Luis C. Lamb. Neural-symbolic learning and reasoning: A survey and interpretation. InNeuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: The State of the Art, volume 342 ofFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 1–51. IOS Press, 2022

  15. [15]

    Genie 3: A new frontier for world models

    Google DeepMind. Genie 3: A new frontier for world models. https://deepmind.google/ blog/genie-3-a-new-frontier-for-world-models/, 2025. Google DeepMind Blog

  16. [16]

    MineWorld: A real-time and open-source interactive world model on Minecraft.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08388, 2025

    Junliang Guo, Yang Ye, Tianyu He, Haoyu Wu, Yushu Jiang, Tim Pearce, and Jiang Bian. MineWorld: A real-time and open-source interactive world model on Minecraft.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08388, 2025

  17. [17]

    Recurrent world models facilitate policy evolution

    David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Recurrent world models facilitate policy evolution. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2018

  18. [18]

    Mastering diverse control tasks through world models.Nature, 640:647–653, 2025

    Danijar Hafner, Jurgis Pasukonis, Jimmy Ba, and Timothy Lillicrap. Mastering diverse control tasks through world models.Nature, 640:647–653, 2025

  19. [19]

    LM- Infinite: Zero-shot extreme length generalization for large language models

    Chi Han, Qifan Wang, Hao Peng, Wenhan Xiong, Yu Chen, Heng Ji, and Sinong Wang. LM- Infinite: Zero-shot extreme length generalization for large language models. InProceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), pages 3991–4008, 2024

  20. [20]

    Matrix-game 2.0: An open-source real-time and streaming interactive world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13009, 2025

    Xianglong He, Chunli Peng, Zexiang Liu, Boyang Wang, Yifan Zhang, Qi Cui, Fei Kang, Biao Jiang, Mengyin An, Yangyang Ren, Baixin Xu, Hao-Xiang Guo, Kaixiong Gong, Size Wu, Wei Li, Xuchen Song, Yang Liu, Yangguang Li, and Yahui Zhou. Matrix-game 2.0: An open-source real-time and streaming interactive world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13009, 2025

  21. [21]

    Jonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey Gritsenko, William Chan, Mohammad Norouzi, and David J. Fleet. Video diffusion models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022

  22. [22]

    Vid2World: Crafting video diffusion models to interactive world models

    Siqiao Huang, Jialong Wu, Qixing Zhou, Shangchen Miao, and Mingsheng Long. Vid2World: Crafting video diffusion models to interactive world models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2025

  23. [23]

    Self forcing: Bridging the train-test gap in autoregressive video diffusion

    Xun Huang, Zhengqi Li, Guande He, Mingyuan Zhou, and Eli Shechtman. Self forcing: Bridging the train-test gap in autoregressive video diffusion. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2025

  24. [24]

    Kling AI launches 3.0 model, ushering in an era where everyone can be a director

    Kuaishou Technology. Kling AI launches 3.0 model, ushering in an era where everyone can be a director. https://ir.kuaishou.com/news-releases/news-release-details/ kling-ai-launches-30-model-ushering-era-where-everyone-can-be , February

  25. [25]

    Accessed: 2026-05-01

  26. [26]

    Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks

    Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020

  27. [27]

    Reasoning physical video generation with diffusion timestep tokens via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15932, 2025

    Wang Lin, Liyu Jia, Wentao Hu, Kaihang Pan, Zhongqi Yue, Wei Zhao, Jingyuan Chen, Fei Wu, and Hanwang Zhang. Reasoning physical video generation with diffusion timestep tokens via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15932, 2025

  28. [28]

    Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, and Matt Le. Flow matching for generative modeling. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. 11

  29. [29]

    Genie 2: A large-scale foundation world model

    Jack Parker-Holder, Philip Ball, Jake Bruce, Vibhavari Dasagi, Kristian Holsheimer, Christos Kaplanis, Alexandre Moufarek, Guy Scully, Jeremy Shar, Jimmy Shi, et al. Genie 2: A large-scale foundation world model. https://deepmind.google/blog/ genie-2-a-large-scale-foundation-world-model/, 2024. Google DeepMind Blog

  30. [30]

    MultiGen: Level-design for editable multiplayer worlds in diffusion game engines.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.06679, 2026

    Ryan Po, David Junhao Zhang, Amir Hertz, Gordon Wetzstein, Neal Wadhwa, and Nataniel Ruiz. MultiGen: Level-design for editable multiplayer worlds in diffusion game engines.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.06679, 2026

  31. [31]

    A VID: Adapting video diffusion models to world models

    Marc Rigter, Tarun Gupta, Agrin Hilmkil, and Chao Ma. A VID: Adapting video diffusion models to world models. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025

  32. [32]

    Solaris: Building a multiplayer video world model in Minecraft.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22208, 2026

    Georgy Savva, Oscar Michel, Daohan Lu, Suppakit Waiwitlikhit, Timothy Meehan, Dhairya Mishra, Srivats Poddar, Jack Lu, and Saining Xie. Solaris: Building a multiplayer video world model in Minecraft.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22208, 2026

  33. [33]

    Zero-shot conditioning of score-based diffusion models by neuro-symbolic constraints

    Davide Scassola, Sebastiano Saccani, Ginevra Carbone, and Luca Bortolussi. Zero-shot conditioning of score-based diffusion models by neuro-symbolic constraints. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 39, pages 20302–20309, 2025

  34. [34]

    Team Seedance, De Chen, Liyang Chen, Xin Chen, Ying Chen, Zhuo Chen, Zhuowei Chen, Feng Cheng, Tianheng Cheng, Yufeng Cheng, Mojie Chi, Xuyan Chi, Jian Cong, Qinpeng Cui, Fei Ding, Qide Dong, Yujiao Du, Haojie Duanmu, Junliang Fan, Jiarui Fang, Jing Fang, Zetao Fang, Chengjian Feng, Yu Gao, Diandian Gu, Dong Guo, Hanzhong Guo, Qiushan Guo, Boyang Hao, Hon...

  35. [35]

    BlendRL: A framework for merging symbolic and neural policy learning

    Hikaru Shindo, Quentin Delfosse, Devendra Singh Dhami, and Kristian Kersting. BlendRL: A framework for merging symbolic and neural policy learning. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025

  36. [36]

    Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George van den Driessche, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, et al

    David Silver, Aja Huang, Chris J. Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George van den Driessche, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search.Nature, 529:484–489, 2016

  37. [37]

    WorldPlay: Towards long-term geometric consistency for real-time interactive world modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14614, 2025

    Wenqiang Sun, Haiyu Zhang, Haoyuan Wang, Junta Wu, Zehan Wang, Zhenwei Wang, Yunhong Wang, Jun Zhang, Tengfei Wang, and Chunchao Guo. WorldPlay: Towards long-term geometric consistency for real-time interactive world modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.14614, 2025. 12

  38. [38]

    Hunyuan-gamecraft-2: Instruction- following interactive game world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.23429, 2025

    Junshu Tang, Jiacheng Liu, Jiaqi Li, Longhuang Wu, Haoyu Yang, Penghao Zhao, Siruis Gong, Xiang Yuan, Shuai Shao, Linfeng Zhang, and Qinglin Lu. Hunyuan-gamecraft-2: Instruction- following interactive game world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.23429, 2025

  39. [39]

    Advancing open-source world models

    Robbyant Team, Zelin Gao, Qiuyu Wang, Yanhong Zeng, Jiapeng Zhu, Ka Leong Cheng, Yixuan Li, Hanlin Wang, Yinghao Xu, Shuailei Ma, et al. Advancing open-source world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20540, 2026

  40. [40]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    Wan Team, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

  41. [41]

    Diffusion models are real-time game engines

    Dani Valevski, Yaniv Leviathan, Moab Arar, and Shlomi Fruchter. Diffusion models are real-time game engines. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025

  42. [42]

    Czarnecki, Michaël Mathieu, Andrew Dudzik, Junyoung Chung, David H

    Oriol Vinyals, Igor Babuschkin, Wojciech M. Czarnecki, Michaël Mathieu, Andrew Dudzik, Junyoung Chung, David H. Choi, Richard Powell, Timo Ewalds, Petko Georgiev, et al. Grand- master level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning.Nature, 575:350–354, 2019

  43. [43]

    Memory networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.3916, 2014

    Jason Weston, Sumit Chopra, and Antoine Bordes. Memory networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.3916, 2014

  44. [44]

    Infinite-World: Scaling interactive world models to 1000-frame horizons via pose-free hierarchical memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02393, 2026

    Ruiqi Wu, Xuanhua He, Meng Cheng, Tianyu Yang, Yong Zhang, Zhuoliang Kang, Xunliang Cai, Xiaoming Wei, Chunle Guo, Chongyi Li, and Ming-Ming Cheng. Infinite-World: Scaling interactive world models to 1000-frame horizons via pose-free hierarchical memory.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02393, 2026

  45. [45]

    Efficient streaming language models with attention sinks

    Guangxuan Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Beidi Chen, Song Han, and Mike Lewis. Efficient streaming language models with attention sinks. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024

  46. [46]

    Longlive: Real-time interactive long video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22622, 2025

    Shuai Yang, Wei Huang, Ruihang Chu, Yicheng Xiao, Yuyang Zhao, Xianbang Wang, Muyang Li, Enze Xie, Yingcong Chen, Yao Lu, et al. Longlive: Real-time interactive long video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22622, 2025

  47. [47]

    Freeman, and Taesung Park

    Tianwei Yin, Michaël Gharbi, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, Frédo Durand, William T. Freeman, and Taesung Park. One-step diffusion with distribution matching distillation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 6613–6623, 2024

  48. [48]

    GameFactory: Creating new games with generative interactive videos

    Jiwen Yu, Yiran Qin, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Xihui Liu. GameFactory: Creating new games with generative interactive videos. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 11590–11599, 2025

  49. [49]

    Matrix-game: Interactive world foundation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18701, 2025

    Yifan Zhang, Chunli Peng, Boyang Wang, Puyi Wang, Qingcheng Zhu, Fei Kang, Biao Jiang, Zedong Gao, Eric Li, Yang Liu, and Yahui Zhou. Matrix-game: Interactive world foundation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18701, 2025

  50. [50]

    Neuro-symbolic synergy for interactive world modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10480, 2026

    Hongyu Zhao, Siyu Zhou, Haolin Yang, Zengyi Qin, and Tianyi Zhou. Neuro-symbolic synergy for interactive world modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10480, 2026

  51. [51]

    double light blade throw

    Jiayi Zhu, Jianing Zhang, Yiying Yang, Wei Cheng, and Xiaoyun Yuan. ShareVerse: Multi-agent consistent video generation for shared world modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02697, 2026. 13 Table 3: Systematic comparison of interactive video world models. ✓ = supported, ✗ = not supported, ∼ = partial.Multi-entityrequires independent and simultaneous control...