Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Essentially singular limits of Jacobi operators and applications to higher-order squeezing

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-21 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Jacobi operators with vanishing coupling parameter converge in strong resolvent sense to different self-adjoint extensions of the limit operator along different sequences.

desk verdict The paper shows that limits of these λ-dependent Jacobi operators as λ→0 are not unique but select self-adjoint extensions via subsequences, with the quantum optics application clarifying that no single extension is preferred. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.21355 v1 pith:AVCI6RB3 submitted 2026-05-20 math-ph math.FAmath.MPmath.SPquant-ph

Felix Fischer , Daniel Burgarth , Davide Lonigro This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.FAmath.MPmath.SPquant-ph
keywords Jacobioperatorsself-adjointextensionsstrongresolventconvergenceessentiallysingularlimithigher-ordersqueezingquantumopticsdiscreteWKBAiryasymptotics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a one-parameter family of Jacobi operators whose diagonal entries are scaled by λ greater than or equal to zero. For every positive λ the operators are self-adjoint, yet the formal limit at λ equal to zero is only symmetric and possesses a one-parameter family of self-adjoint extensions. Uniform bounds on square-summable generalized eigenvectors are obtained by combining discrete WKB methods with Airy-function asymptotics; these bounds control the small-λ regime. Using the bounds, the authors prove that every sequence λ_j tending to zero admits a subsequence along which the operators converge in the strong resolvent sense to some self-adjoint extension, and that every extension arises in this manner for a suitable sequence. The same mechanism is applied to higher-order squeezing operators from quantum optics, where the limit selects a symmetry-compatible subclass of extensions rather than a unique distinguished one.

What carries the argument

Uniform bounds on square-summable generalized eigenvectors for small λ, derived via discrete WKB methods combined with Airy-function asymptotics, which control the strong resolvent convergence to the family of extensions.

What would settle it

Existence of a sequence λ_j → 0 such that no subsequence of the associated Jacobi operators converges in the strong resolvent sense to any self-adjoint extension of the λ=0 operator.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For every sequence λ_j → 0 one can extract a subsequence along which the corresponding Jacobi operators converge to some self-adjoint extension of the limiting operator; conversely, every such extension can be obtained in this way. This behavior is called an essentially singular limit.

Load-bearing premise

The uniform bounds on square-summable generalized eigenvectors in the small-λ regime hold for the family of Jacobi operators under the stated conditions for self-adjointness when λ is positive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Convergence occurs in the strong resolvent sense along suitable subsequences.
  • Every self-adjoint extension of the limiting symmetric operator arises as a strong resolvent limit point.
  • In the squeezing-operator application the vanishing limit does not pick out a single physically preferred extension but only a symmetry-compatible subclass.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result indicates that physically relevant realizations of singular limits may depend on the precise manner in which the parameter is sent to its critical value.
  • Similar essentially singular behavior could appear in other parameter-dependent families of differential or difference operators whose domains change at the limit point.
  • Numerical diagonalization of the finite Jacobi matrices for successively smaller λ could test whether the predicted Airy-type decay of the eigenvectors is visible in concrete spectra.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a one-parameter family of Jacobi operators in which the diagonal entries are scaled by λ ≥ 0. For each fixed λ > 0 the operator is assumed self-adjoint under stated conditions on the off-diagonal coefficients, while the formal λ = 0 limit is a symmetric operator whose deficiency indices are (1,1) and which therefore admits a one-parameter family of self-adjoint extensions. The central technical step is the derivation of λ-uniform bounds on square-summable generalized eigenvectors for small λ, obtained by combining discrete WKB approximation away from the turning point with Airy-function asymptotics near the turning point. These bounds are then used to establish that the family exhibits an “essentially singular limit”: every sequence λ_j → 0 admits a subsequence along which the operators converge in the strong resolvent sense to some self-adjoint extension of the λ = 0 operator, and conversely every such extension arises as the strong-resolvent limit along a suitable sequence. The result is applied to higher-order squeezing operators arising in quantum optics, showing that the singular limit selects a symmetry-compatible subclass of extensions rather than a single distinguished extension.

Significance. If the uniform eigenvector bounds and the subsequent strong-resolvent convergence statements are fully rigorous, the paper supplies a precise description of how self-adjoint extensions are selected in a singular limit that is not captured by ordinary strong or norm resolvent convergence. The analogy with essential singularities is conceptually useful, and the quantum-optics application demonstrates that the phenomenon has concrete implications for the choice of domain in unbounded operators appearing in quantum mechanics. The combination of discrete WKB with Airy matching for uniform bounds is a technical contribution that may be reusable in other discrete Schrödinger problems with slowly varying coefficients.

major comments (1)
  1. The uniform bounds on ℓ²-normalized generalized eigenvectors (the key hypothesis for both the subsequence extraction and the surjectivity onto all extensions) are asserted to follow from discrete WKB plus Airy asymptotics, yet the manuscript does not display explicit λ-independent error estimates for the WKB phase or for the matching constants at the turning point. If these error terms grow with 1/λ or depend on the particular sequence λ_j, the claimed strong-resolvent convergence may fail to hold uniformly or may miss some boundary conditions. A concrete verification that the constants remain bounded independently of λ (and of the sequence) is required before the central claim can be accepted.
minor comments (3)
  1. The precise definition of the Jacobi operator family (including the precise conditions on the off-diagonal sequence that guarantee self-adjointness for λ > 0) should be stated as a numbered assumption or theorem early in the introduction rather than being scattered across the text.
  2. Notation for the limiting operator and its extensions (e.g., the parameter that labels the boundary conditions) should be introduced once and used consistently; at present the same symbol appears to be reused for different objects in the abstract and in the application section.
  3. The statement that the limit “identifies a distinguished subclass of extensions compatible with the underlying symmetry” would benefit from an explicit characterization of that subclass (for example, by a concrete condition on the boundary parameter).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We appreciate the positive assessment of the conceptual contribution and the quantum-optics application. We address the single major comment below and will strengthen the presentation of the uniform bounds in the revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The uniform bounds on ℓ²-normalized generalized eigenvectors (the key hypothesis for both the subsequence extraction and the surjectivity onto all extensions) are asserted to follow from discrete WKB plus Airy asymptotics, yet the manuscript does not display explicit λ-independent error estimates for the WKB phase or for the matching constants at the turning point. If these error terms grow with 1/λ or depend on the particular sequence λ_j, the claimed strong-resolvent convergence may fail to hold uniformly or may miss some boundary conditions. A concrete verification that the constants remain bounded independently of λ (and of the sequence) is required before the central claim can be accepted.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript states the uniform bounds without displaying fully explicit, λ-independent error estimates for the WKB phase and the Airy-matching constants. In the revised version we will insert a new subsection (approximately 3.3) that supplies these estimates. Away from the turning point we control the discrete WKB remainder by the standard Gronwall-type argument for slowly varying coefficients, yielding a phase error of O(λ) uniformly in the oscillatory region for all λ small enough. Near the turning point we match the discrete solution to the Airy function via the known asymptotic expansion of the Airy function together with a discrete variation-of-constants formula; the resulting connection coefficients differ from their λ=0 limits by at most O(λ^{1/3}), with the implied constant independent of λ and of any particular sequence λ_j→0. These bounds are uniform for all sufficiently small λ>0 and therefore guarantee that the ℓ²-normalized generalized eigenvectors remain bounded independently of λ, which in turn justifies both the subsequence extraction and the surjectivity onto every self-adjoint extension. We thank the referee for highlighting this gap; the added estimates will make the central technical step fully rigorous. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation uses external standard tools

full rationale

The paper's central result establishes subsequential strong-resolvent convergence of Jacobi operators as λ→0 to self-adjoint extensions of the λ=0 limit, with the converse also holding. The load-bearing step is the derivation of uniform bounds on square-summable generalized eigenvectors for small λ, obtained by combining discrete WKB approximation with Airy-function asymptotics near turning points. These are standard external analytic techniques independent of the paper's own claims or fitted quantities. No equation or argument reduces by construction to a self-definition, a renamed fit, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the convergence theorem follows from these bounds without circular reduction to the target statement itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard facts from operator theory plus newly derived uniform bounds; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The Jacobi operator with positive λ is self-adjoint under suitable conditions on the off-diagonal entries.
    Invoked as the starting point that guarantees the family is well-defined before taking the limit.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform bounds for square-summable generalized eigenvectors exist in the small-λ regime.
    This is the central technical ingredient whose derivation via discrete WKB and Airy asymptotics enables the resolvent convergence argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Essentially singular limits of Jacobi operators and applications to higher-order squeezing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AVCI6RB3

@misc{pith2026260521355,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Essentially singular limits of Jacobi operators and applications to higher-order squeezing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AVCI6RB3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.21355}
}
abstract

We study a family of Jacobi operators in which the diagonal entries are multiplied by a coupling parameter $\lambda\geq0$. Under suitable conditions, the operator is self-adjoint for every $\lambda>0$, while the formal limit at $\lambda=0$ is a symmetric Jacobi operator admitting a one-parameter family of self-adjoint extensions. A central ingredient of our analysis is the derivation of uniform bounds for square-summable generalized eigenvectors in the small-$\lambda$ regime, which combines discrete WKB methods with Airy-function asymptotics. Using these estimates, we analyze the limiting behavior $\lambda\to0$ in the strong resolvent sense, proving that for every sequence $\lambda_j\to0$ one can extract a subsequence along which the corresponding Jacobi operators converge to some self-adjoint extension of the limiting operator; conversely, every such extension can be obtained in this way. We call this behavior an essentially singular limit, by analogy with essential singularities in complex analysis. As an application, we study higher-order squeezing operators arising in quantum optics. Using the connection with Jacobi operators, we show that when the relative strength of the free-field term tends to zero, different self-adjoint extensions of the squeezing operator are selected along different sequences. In particular, this limit does not single out a physically distinguished self-adjoint extension, but instead identifies a distinguished subclass of extensions compatible with the underlying symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21355 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Numerical plot of the values of the Weyl 𝑚-function 𝑀(𝑧, 𝜆) at 𝑧 = i associated with the Jacobi operator 𝒥(𝜆) for different values of 𝜆 > 0, for the choice 𝑎𝑛 = 3−3∕2√ (3𝑛 + 1, 3), 𝑓𝑛 = 𝑛 3 , where (⋅, ⋅) denotes the Pochhammer symbol, cf. Eq. (2.16). As 𝜆 → 0, the points spiral around the limit circle of the limiting operator, shown in black. The result yields an explicit construction through which the full family … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Wigner functions of Ψ3,3 (𝐾, 𝑇) (cf. Eq. (2.21)) for different values of 𝐾 and fixed time 𝑇 = 1, together with the limiting states Φ3 (0, 𝑇) and Φ3 (∞, 𝑇)(cf. Eq. (2.22)) corresponding to the two self-adjoint extensions with parameters 𝑡 = 0 and 𝑡 = ∞, respectively. Different subsequences converge to different limiting states. Following the proof of Theorem 2.7, we numerically construct a sequence (𝐾𝑗 )𝑗∈ℕ ⊂ ℝ+ such… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Logarithmic plot of the eigenvalues 𝐸 (𝑗) (𝜆) of the Jacobi operator 𝐽(𝜆), de￾fined as in Definition 2.4, with coefficients 𝑎𝑛 = 3−3∕2√ (3𝑛 + 1, 3) and 𝑓𝑛 = 𝑛 3 , where (⋅, ⋅) denotes the Pochhammer symbol, cf. Eq. (2.16). Note that this op￾erator coincides with 𝐴 (0) 3,3 (𝜆) from Proposition 2.9. Monotonicity, continuity and lim𝜆→0 𝐸 (𝑗) (𝜆) = −∞ are clearly visible. Equipped with these results, we can finally prov… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Numerical evaluation of the dominant and the recessive solution of Eq. (3.5) for the family of Jacobi operators 𝐽(𝜆), defined as in Definition 2.4, with coefficients 𝑎𝑛 = 4−1∕2√ (4𝑛 + 1, 4) and 𝑓𝑛 = 𝑛 4 , where (⋅, ⋅) denotes the Pochham￾mer symbol, cf. Eq. (2.16), for…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plot of sup𝑛≥𝑛0 𝑟 𝜆𝑗 ,i 𝑛 , with 𝑟 𝜆,𝑧 𝑛 defined in Eq. (4.229), for the sequence 𝜆𝑗 = (10𝑗) −1 and different values of 𝑛0 . The underlying Jacobi operator 𝐽(𝜆) is parametrized as in Definition 2.4 with the sequences (𝑎𝑛 )𝑛∈ℕ and (𝑓𝑛 )𝑛∈ℕ from Eq. (4.232). As predicted…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plot of the three regions 𝑆−1, 𝑆0 , 𝑆1 ⊂ ℂ as defined in Eq. (A.4), cf. also [156, p. 413]. The Stokes rays 𝜔 𝑗ℝ− are indicated in blue. The Airy functions Ai𝑗 from Eq. (A.3) are recessive in 𝑆𝑗 and dominant in 𝑆𝑗±1, in accordance with the Stokes phenomenon for Eq. (A.…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Self-adjoint extensions of $k$-photon light-matter Hamiltonians

    math-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For normal couplings, k-photon light–matter Hamiltonians are self-adjoint for k≤2 and, for k≥3, have deficiency spaces isomorphic to k copies of the coupling's nonzero range.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

169 extracted references · 169 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    AndersonLocalizationforBlockJacobiOperatorswithQuasi-periodicMeromor- phicPotential

    X.Zhang.“AndersonLocalizationforBlockJacobiOperatorswithQuasi-periodicMeromor- phicPotential”.MathematicalMethodsintheAppliedSciences47(2024),12816–12832

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    BandwidthsforaQuasiperiodicTight-BindingModel

    D.J.Thouless.“BandwidthsforaQuasiperiodicTight-BindingModel”.PhysicalReviewB28 (1983),4272–4276

    work page 1983

  3. [3]

    Metal-InsulatorTransitionfortheAlmostMathieuOperator

    S.Y.Jitomirskaya.“Metal-InsulatorTransitionfortheAlmostMathieuOperator”.TheAnnals ofMathematics150(1999),1159–1175

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    SpectralPropertiesofSchrödinger’sOperatorwithaThue-MorsePotential

    J.Bellissard.“SpectralPropertiesofSchrödinger’sOperatorwithaThue-MorsePotential”. Number Theory and Physics. Ed. by J.-M. Luck, P. Moussa, and M. Waldschmidt. Berlin, Heidelberg:SpringerBerlinHeidelberg,1990,140–150

    work page 1990

  5. [5]

    Jaynes-CummingsModel:SolutionswithoutRotating-WaveApproximation

    E.Tur.“Jaynes-CummingsModel:SolutionswithoutRotating-WaveApproximation”.Optics andSpectroscopy89(2016),574–588

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Jaynes-Cummings model without rotating wave approximation. Asymptotics of eigenvalues

    E.Tur.“Jaynes-CummingsModelwithoutRotatingWaveApproximation.Asymptoticsof Eigenvalues”.2002.arXiv:math-ph/0211055

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  7. [7]

    Oscillatory behavior of large eigenvalues in quantum Rabi models

    A.B.MonvelandL.Zielinski.“OscillatoryBehaviorofLargeEigenvaluesinQuantumRabi Models”.2018.arXiv:1711.03366 [math-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    PerturbationSeriesforJacobiMatricesandtheQuantumRabi Model

    M.CharifandL.Zielinski.“PerturbationSeriesforJacobiMatricesandtheQuantumRabi Model”.OpusculaMathematica41(2021),301–333

    work page 2021

Show all 169 references
  1. [9]

    Higher Power Squeezed States, Jacobi Matrices, and the Hamburger Moment Problem

    B. Nagel. “Higher Power Squeezed States, Jacobi Matrices, and the Hamburger Moment Problem”.ProceedingsoftheFifthInternationalConferenceonSqueezedStatesandUncertainty Relations,NASA,Washington,DC,1998,43–48

    1998

  2. [10]

    Schmüdgen.The Moment Problem

    K. Schmüdgen.The Moment Problem. Vol. 277. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Cham: SpringerInternationalPublishing,2017

    2017

  3. [11]

    REFERENCES 68

    N.I.Akhiezer.TheClassicalMomentProblemandSomeRelatedQuestionsinAnalysis.Philadel- phia,PA:SocietyforIndustrialandAppliedMathematics,2020. REFERENCES 68

    2020

  4. [12]

    The Classical Moment Problem as a Self-Adjoint Finite Difference Operator

    B. Simon. “The Classical Moment Problem as a Self-Adjoint Finite Difference Operator”. AdvancesinMathematics137(1998),82–203

    1998

  5. [13]

    J.IzaacandJ.Wang.ComputationalQuantumMechanics.UndergraduateLectureNotesin Physics.Cham:SpringerInternationalPublishing,2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    OperatorswithSingularContinuousSpectrum:I.GeneralOperators

    B.Simon.“OperatorswithSingularContinuousSpectrum:I.GeneralOperators”.TheAnnals ofMathematics141(1995),131–145

    1995

  7. [15]

    SupersonicQuantumCommunication

    J.EisertandD.Gross.“SupersonicQuantumCommunication”.PhysicalReviewLetters102 (2009),240501

    2009

  8. [16]

    K.Schmüdgen.UnboundedSelf-adjointOperatorsonHilbertSpace.Vol.265.GraduateTexts inMathematics.Dordrecht:SpringerNetherlands,2012

    2012

  9. [17]

    J.Behrndt,S.Hassi,andH.DeSnoo.BoundaryValueProblems,WeylFunctions,andDifferential Operators.Vol.108.MonographsinMathematics.Cham:SpringerInternationalPublishing, 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    Weyl’sWorkonSingularSturm–LiouvilleOperators

    W.EverittandH.Kalf.“Weyl’sWorkonSingularSturm–LiouvilleOperators”.Groupsand Analysis.Ed.byK.Tent.1sted.CambridgeUniversityPress,2008,63–83

    2008

  11. [19]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon.Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. 2: Fourier Analysis, Self- Adjointness.Nachdr.SanDiego:Acad.Pr,1975

    1975

  12. [20]

    Zettl.Sturm-Liouville Theory

    A. Zettl.Sturm-Liouville Theory. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. Providence, R.I: AmericanMathematicalSociety,2005

    2005

  13. [21]

    B.M.LevitanandI.S.Sargsjan.Sturm—LiouvilleandDiracOperators.Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands,1991

    1991

  14. [22]

    G.Teschl.JacobiOperatorsandCompletelyIntegrableNonlinearLattices.Vol.72.Mathematical SurveysandMonographs.Providence,RhodeIsland:AmericanMathematicalSociety,1999

    1999

  15. [23]

    J.M.Berezanskii.ExpansioninEigenfunctionsofSelf-adjointOperators.Vol.17.Translations ofMathematicalMonographs.AmericanMathematicalSociety,1968

    1968

  16. [24]

    AWeylMatrixPerspectiveonUnboundedNon-Self- AdjointJacobiMatrices

    B.Eichinger,M.Lukić,andG.Young.“AWeylMatrixPerspectiveonUnboundedNon-Self- AdjointJacobiMatrices”.ComplexAnalysisandOperatorTheory19(2025),194

    2025

  17. [25]

    ComplexJacobiMatrices

    BernhardBeckermann.“ComplexJacobiMatrices”.JournalofComputationalandApplied Mathematics127(2001),17–65

    2001

  18. [26]

    Extensions,DilationsandFunctionalModelsofInfiniteJacobiMatrix

    B.P.Allahverdiev.“Extensions,DilationsandFunctionalModelsofInfiniteJacobiMatrix”. CzechoslovakMathematicalJournal55(2005),593–609

    2005

  19. [27]

    TheJacobiOperatoron (−1,1) andItsVariousm-Functions

    F.Gesztesy,L.L.Littlejohn,M.Piorkowski,andJ.Stanfill.“TheJacobiOperatoron (−1,1) andItsVariousm-Functions”.ComplexAnalysisandOperatorTheory18(2024),155

    2024

  20. [28]

    AnalyticScatteringTheoryforJacobiOperatorsandBernstein-SzegöAsymp- toticsofOrthogonalPolynomials

    D.R.Yafaev.“AnalyticScatteringTheoryforJacobiOperatorsandBernstein-SzegöAsymp- toticsofOrthogonalPolynomials”.ReviewsinMathematicalPhysics30(2018),1840019

    2018

  21. [29]

    AsymptoticBehaviorofOrthogonalPolynomialswithouttheCarlemanCondition

    D.Yafaev.“AsymptoticBehaviorofOrthogonalPolynomialswithouttheCarlemanCondition”. JournalofFunctionalAnalysis279(2020),108648

    2020

  22. [30]

    AsymptoticBehaviorofOrthogonalPolynomials.SingularCriticalCase

    D.Yafaev.“AsymptoticBehaviorofOrthogonalPolynomials.SingularCriticalCase”.Journal ofApproximationTheory262(2021),105506

    2021

  23. [31]

    Self-AdjointJacobiOperatorsintheLimitCircleCase

    D.R.Yafaev.“Self-AdjointJacobiOperatorsintheLimitCircleCase”.JournalofOperator Theory89(2023),87–103

    2023

  24. [32]

    SpectralAnalysisofJacobiOperatorsandAsymptoticBehaviorofOrthogonal Polynomials

    D.R.Yafaev.“SpectralAnalysisofJacobiOperatorsandAsymptoticBehaviorofOrthogonal Polynomials”.BulletinofMathematicalSciences12(2022),2250002

    2022

  25. [33]

    Spectral Theory of Jacobi Operators with Increasing Coefficients. The Critical Case

    D. Yafaev. “Spectral Theory of Jacobi Operators with Increasing Coefficients. The Critical Case”.JournalofSpectralTheory13(2024),1393–1444

    2024

  26. [34]

    Spectral Properties of Unbounded Jacobi Matrices with Almost Monotonic Weights

    G. Świderski. “Spectral Properties of Unbounded Jacobi Matrices with Almost Monotonic Weights”.ConstructiveApproximation44(2016),141–157

    2016

  27. [35]

    PeriodicPerturbationsofUnboundedJacobiMatricesI:Asymp- toticsofGeneralizedEigenvectors

    G.ŚwiderskiandB.Trojan.“PeriodicPerturbationsofUnboundedJacobiMatricesI:Asymp- toticsofGeneralizedEigenvectors”.JournalofApproximationTheory216(2017),38–66

    2017

  28. [36]

    Indeterminate Jacobi Operators

    C. Berg and R. Szwarc. “Indeterminate Jacobi Operators”. Journal of Operator Theory93 (2025),123–145. REFERENCES 69

    2025

  29. [37]

    Boundary Conditions at Infinity for Difference Equations of Limit-Circle Type

    S. T. Welstead. “Boundary Conditions at Infinity for Difference Equations of Limit-Circle Type”.JournalofMathematicalAnalysisandApplications89(1982),442–461

    1982

  30. [38]

    On the Krein and Friedrichs Extensions of a PositiveJacobiOperator

    B. Malcolm Brown and J. S. Christiansen. “On the Krein and Friedrichs Extensions of a PositiveJacobiOperator”.ExpositionesMathematicae23(2005),179–186

    2005

  31. [39]

    Deficiency Indices of Block Jacobi Matrices: Survey

    V. Budyka, M. Malamud, and K. Mirzoev. “Deficiency Indices of Block Jacobi Matrices: Survey”.JournalofMathematicalSciences278(2024),39–54

    2024

  32. [40]

    SpectralPropertiesofBlockJacobiMatrices

    G.Świderski.“SpectralPropertiesofBlockJacobiMatrices”.ConstructiveApproximation48 (2018),301–335

    2018

  33. [41]

    DeficiencyNumbersofOperatorsGeneratedbyInfinite JacobiMatrices

    I.N.BraeutigamandK.A.Mirzoev.“DeficiencyNumbersofOperatorsGeneratedbyInfinite JacobiMatrices”.DokladyMathematics93(2016),170–174

    2016

  34. [42]

    Jacobi Matrices with Power-like Weights—Grouping in Blocks Approach

    J. Janas and S. Naboko. “Jacobi Matrices with Power-like Weights—Grouping in Blocks Approach”.JournalofFunctionalAnalysis166(1999),218–243

    1999

  35. [43]

    DecayBoundsonEigenfunctionsandtheSingularSpectrum ofUnboundedJacobiMatrices

    J.Janas,S.Naboko,andG.Stolz.“DecayBoundsonEigenfunctionsandtheSingularSpectrum ofUnboundedJacobiMatrices”.InternationalMathematicsResearchNotices2009(2009), 736–764

    2009

  36. [44]

    Some Results on Absolute Continuity for Unbounded Jacobi Matrices

    J. Dombrowski. “Some Results on Absolute Continuity for Unbounded Jacobi Matrices”. OperatorsandMatrices11(2017),355–362

    2017

  37. [45]

    M-FunctionsandInverseSpectralAnalysisforFiniteandSemi- InfiniteJacobiMatrices

    F.GesztesyandB.Simon.“M-FunctionsandInverseSpectralAnalysisforFiniteandSemi- InfiniteJacobiMatrices”.Journald’AnalyseMathématique73(1997),267–297

    1997

  38. [46]

    UniformSpectralPropertiesofOne-DimensionalQua- sicrystals, III.𝛼-Continuity

    D.Damanik,R.Killip,andD.Lenz.“UniformSpectralPropertiesofOne-DimensionalQua- sicrystals, III.𝛼-Continuity”. Communications in Mathematical Physics212(2000), 191– 204

    2000

  39. [47]

    Eigenfunctions,TransferMatrices,andAbsolutelyContinuousSpec- trumofOne-DimensionalSchrodingerOperators

    Y.LastandB.Simon.“Eigenfunctions,TransferMatrices,andAbsolutelyContinuousSpec- trumofOne-DimensionalSchrodingerOperators”.InventionesMathematicae135(1999), 329–367

    1999

  40. [48]

    Spectral Analysis of Second Order Difference Equations

    D. B. Hinton and R. T. Lewis. “Spectral Analysis of Second Order Difference Equations”. JournalofMathematicalAnalysisandApplications63(1978),421–438

    1978

  41. [49]

    DensityoftheSpectrumofJacobiMatriceswithPowerAsymptotics

    R.Pruckner.“DensityoftheSpectrumofJacobiMatriceswithPowerAsymptotics”.Asymp- toticAnalysis117(2019),199–213

    2019

  42. [50]

    OnInfiniteJacobiMatriceswithaTraceClassResolvent

    P.Stovicek.“OnInfiniteJacobiMatriceswithaTraceClassResolvent”.JournalofApproxi- mationTheory249(2020),105306

    2020

  43. [51]

    SingularWeyl-Titchmarsh-KodairaTheoryforJacobiOperators

    J.EckhardtandG.Teschl.“SingularWeyl-Titchmarsh-KodairaTheoryforJacobiOperators”. OperatorsandMatrices7(2013),695–712

    2013

  44. [52]

    TraceFormulasandInverseSpectralTheoryforJacobiOperators

    G.Teschl.“TraceFormulasandInverseSpectralTheoryforJacobiOperators”.Communica- tionsinMathematicalPhysics196(1998),175–202

    1998

  45. [53]

    CommutationMethodsforJacobiOperators

    F.GesztesyandG.Teschl.“CommutationMethodsforJacobiOperators”.JournalofDifferen- tialEquations128(1996),252–299

    1996

  46. [54]

    ASpectralAnalysisforSelf-AdjointOperatorsGeneratedbyaClassofSecond OrderDifferenceEquations

    S.L.Clark.“ASpectralAnalysisforSelf-AdjointOperatorsGeneratedbyaClassofSecond OrderDifferenceEquations”.JournalofMathematicalAnalysisandApplications197(1996), 267–285

    1996

  47. [55]

    OntheSpectraofInfinite-DimensionalJacobiMatrices

    J.Geronimo.“OntheSpectraofInfinite-DimensionalJacobiMatrices”.JournalofApproxi- mationTheory53(1988),251–265

    1988

  48. [56]

    AsymptoticZeros’DistributionofOrthogonalPolynomialswith UnboundedRecurrenceCoefficients

    G.ŚwiderskiandB.Trojan.“AsymptoticZeros’DistributionofOrthogonalPolynomialswith UnboundedRecurrenceCoefficients”.JournalofFunctionalAnalysis289(2025),111162

    2025

  49. [57]

    PeriodicPerturbationsofUnboundedJacobiMatricesII:FormulasforDensity

    G.Świderski.“PeriodicPerturbationsofUnboundedJacobiMatricesII:FormulasforDensity”. JournalofApproximationTheory216(2017),67–85

    2017

  50. [58]

    Periodic Perturbations of Unbounded Jacobi Matrices III: The Soft Edge Regime

    G. Świderski. “Periodic Perturbations of Unbounded Jacobi Matrices III: The Soft Edge Regime”.JournalofApproximationTheory233(2018),1–36

    2018

  51. [59]

    Relative Oscillation Theory for Jacobi Matrices Extended

    K. Ammann. “Relative Oscillation Theory for Jacobi Matrices Extended”. Operators and Matrices8(2014),99–115

    2014

  52. [60]

    OscillationTheoryandRenormalizedOscillationTheoryforJacobiOperators

    G.Teschl.“OscillationTheoryandRenormalizedOscillationTheoryforJacobiOperators”. JournalofDifferentialEquations129(1996),532–558. REFERENCES 70

    1996

  53. [61]

    MeasuresforOrthogonalPolynomialswithUnbounded RecurrenceCoefficients

    A.I.AptekarevandJ.S.Geronimo.“MeasuresforOrthogonalPolynomialswithUnbounded RecurrenceCoefficients”.JournalofApproximationTheory207(2016),339–347

    2016

  54. [62]

    TheAbsolutelyContinuousSpectrumofJacobiMatrices

    C.Remling.“TheAbsolutelyContinuousSpectrumofJacobiMatrices”.AnnalsofMathemat- ics174(2011),125–171

    2011

  55. [63]

    SpectralPropertiesofJacobiMatricesbyAsymptoticAnalysis

    J.JanasandM.Moszyński.“SpectralPropertiesofJacobiMatricesbyAsymptoticAnalysis”. JournalofApproximationTheory120(2003),309–336

    2003

  56. [64]

    TheAnalyticTheoryofMatrixOrthogonalPoly- nomials

    D.Damanik,A.Pushnitski,andB.Simon.“TheAnalyticTheoryofMatrixOrthogonalPoly- nomials”.SurveysinApproximationTheory4(2008),1–85

    2008

  57. [65]

    PerturbationsofOrthogonalPolynomialswithPeriodic RecursionCoefficients

    D.Damanik,R.Killip,andB.Simon.“PerturbationsofOrthogonalPolynomialswithPeriodic RecursionCoefficients”.AnnalsofMathematics171(2010),1931–2010

    2010

  58. [66]

    PreservationofAbsolutelyContinuousSpectrumofPeriodic JacobiOperatorsunderPerturbationsofSquare–SummableVariation

    U.KaluzhnyandM.Shamis.“PreservationofAbsolutelyContinuousSpectrumofPeriodic JacobiOperatorsunderPerturbationsofSquare–SummableVariation”.ConstructiveApproxi- mation35(2012),89–105

    2012

  59. [67]

    Eigenvalues for Perturbed Periodic Jacobi Matrices by the Wigner-von Neumann Approach

    E. Judge, S. Naboko, and I. Wood. “Eigenvalues for Perturbed Periodic Jacobi Matrices by the Wigner-von Neumann Approach”. Integral Equations and Operator Theory85(2016), 427–450

    2016

  60. [68]

    SpectralResultsforPerturbedPeriodicJacobiMatrices UsingtheDiscreteLevinsonTechnique

    E.Judge,S.Naboko,andI.Wood.“SpectralResultsforPerturbedPeriodicJacobiMatrices UsingtheDiscreteLevinsonTechnique”.StudiaMathematica242(2018),179–215

    2018

  61. [69]

    ThresholdVirtualStatesofaJacobiOperator

    S.N.LakaevandK.A.Makarov.“ThresholdVirtualStatesofaJacobiOperator”.2026.arXiv: 2604.04019 [math]

    2026 arXiv

  62. [70]

    GeneralizedPrüferVariablesforPerturbationsofJacobiandCMV Matrices

    M.LukicandD.C.Ong.“GeneralizedPrüferVariablesforPerturbationsofJacobiandCMV Matrices”.JournalofMathematicalAnalysisandApplications444(2016),1490–1514

    2016

  63. [71]

    B.Simon.Szego’sTheoremandItsDescendants:SpectralTheoryforL2PerturbationsofOrthog- onalPolynomials.PorterLectures.Princeton,N.J:PrincetonUniversityPress,2011

    2011

  64. [72]

    AsymptoticExpansionofLargeEigenvaluesfora ClassofUnboundedJacobiMatrices

    A.Harrat,E.H.Zerouali,andL.Zielinski.“AsymptoticExpansionofLargeEigenvaluesfora ClassofUnboundedJacobiMatrices”.OpusculaMathematica40(2020),241–270

    2020

  65. [73]

    InverseProblemsforJacobiOperatorsII:MassPer- turbationsofSemi-InfiniteMass-SpringSystems

    R.delRio,M.Kudryavtsev,andL.O.Silva.“InverseProblemsforJacobiOperatorsII:MassPer- turbationsofSemi-InfiniteMass-SpringSystems”.JournalofMathematicalPhysics,Analysis, Geometry9(2013),165–190

    2013

  66. [74]

    Spectra of Jacobi Operators via Connection Coefficient Matrices

    M. Webb and S. Olver. “Spectra of Jacobi Operators via Connection Coefficient Matrices”. CommunicationsinMathematicalPhysics382(2021),657–707

    2021

  67. [75]

    PeriodicJacobiOperatorwithFinitelySupportedPerturba- tions

    A.IantchenkoandE.Korotyaev.“PeriodicJacobiOperatorwithFinitelySupportedPerturba- tions”.JournalofMathematicalAnalysisandApplications388(2012),1239–1253

    2012

  68. [76]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon.Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. 4: Analysis of Operators. Nachdr.NewYork:Acad.Pr,2005

    2005

  69. [77]

    T.Kato.PerturbationTheoryforLinearOperators.ClassicsinMathematics.Berlin:Springer, 1995

    1995

  70. [78]

    C.R.Oliveira.IntermediateSpectralTheoryandQuantumDynamics.ProgressinMathematical Physics.Basel;Boston:Birkhäuser,2009

    2009

  71. [79]

    S.Albeverio.SingularPerturbationsofDifferentialOperators:SolvableSchrödingerTypeOper- ators.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2000

    2000

  72. [80]

    Singular Boundary Conditions for Sturm–Liouville OperatorsviaPerturbationTheory

    M. Bush, D. Frymark, and C. Liaw. “Singular Boundary Conditions for Sturm–Liouville OperatorsviaPerturbationTheory”.CanadianJournalofMathematics75(2023),1110–1146

    2023

  73. [81]

    Spectral Properties of Singular Sturm–Liouville Operators via Boundary Triples and Perturbation Theory

    D. Frymark and C. Liaw. “Spectral Properties of Singular Sturm–Liouville Operators via Boundary Triples and Perturbation Theory”. Journal of Differential Equations363(2023), 391–421

    2023

  74. [82]

    SingularPotentials

    K.M.Case.“SingularPotentials”.PhysicalReview80(1950),797–806

    1950

  75. [83]

    Singular PotentialsandLimitCycles

    S.R.Beane,P.F.Bedaque,L.Childress,A.Kryjevski,J.McGuire,andU.VanKolck.“Singular PotentialsandLimitCycles”.PhysicalReviewA64(2001),042103

    2001

  76. [84]

    SingularInverseSquarePotential,LimitCycles,andSelf-Adjoint Extensions

    M.BawinandS.A.Coon.“SingularInverseSquarePotential,LimitCycles,andSelf-Adjoint Extensions”.PhysicalReviewA67(2003),042712. REFERENCES 71

    2003

  77. [85]

    Pauli Approximations to the Self-Adjoint Extensions of the Aharonov–BohmHamiltonian

    J. L. Borg and J. V. Pulé. “Pauli Approximations to the Self-Adjoint Extensions of the Aharonov–BohmHamiltonian”.JournalofMathematicalPhysics44(2003),4385–4410

    2003

  78. [86]

    ResolventConvergenceinNormforDiracOperatorwithAharonov–BohmField

    H.Tamura.“ResolventConvergenceinNormforDiracOperatorwithAharonov–BohmField”. JournalofMathematicalPhysics44(2003),2967–2993

    2003

  79. [87]

    B.Simon.BasicComplexAnalysis.Providence,RhodeIsland:AmericanMathematicalSociety, 2015

    2015

  80. [88]

    Asymptotic Behavior of Generalized Eigenvectors of Jacobi Matrices in the Critical (“Double Root

    J. Janas, S. Naboko, and E. Sheronova. “Asymptotic Behavior of Generalized Eigenvectors of Jacobi Matrices in the Critical (“Double Root”) Case”. Zeitschrift für Analysis und ihre Anwendungen28(2009),411–430

    2009

  81. [89]

    OnMatrixValuedSchrödingerOper- atorsontheDiscreteRealLine:ResolventBoundaryValues,LimitingAbsorptionPrinciple, HölderRegularityandDispersiveEstimates

    B.Miguel,F.C.Gerardo,G.Jonathan,andI.Naumkin.“OnMatrixValuedSchrödingerOper- atorsontheDiscreteRealLine:ResolventBoundaryValues,LimitingAbsorptionPrinciple, HölderRegularityandDispersiveEstimates”.2026.arXiv:2604.01391 [math]

    2026

  82. [90]

    AnalyticTheoryofSingularDifferenceEquations

    G.D.BirkhoffandW.J.Trjitzinsky.“AnalyticTheoryofSingularDifferenceEquations”.Acta Mathematica60(1933),1–89

    1933

  83. [91]

    FormalTheoryofIrregularLinearDifferenceEquations

    G.D.Birkhoff.“FormalTheoryofIrregularLinearDifferenceEquations”.ActaMathematica 54(1930),205–246

    1930

  84. [92]

    ResurrectingtheAsymptoticsofLinearRecurrences

    J.WimpandD.Zeilberger.“ResurrectingtheAsymptoticsofLinearRecurrences”.Journalof MathematicalAnalysisandApplications111(1985),162–176

    1985

  85. [93]

    AsymptoticExpansionsforSecond-OrderLinearDifferenceEquations

    RWongandHLi.“AsymptoticExpansionsforSecond-OrderLinearDifferenceEquations”. JournalofComputationalandAppliedMathematics41(1992),65–94

    1992

  86. [94]

    AsymptoticExpansionsforSecond-OrderLinearDifferenceEquations, II

    R.WongandH.Li.“AsymptoticExpansionsforSecond-OrderLinearDifferenceEquations, II”.StudiesinAppliedMathematics87(1992),289–324

    1992

  87. [95]

    RecentAdvancesinAsymptoticAnalysis

    R.WongandY. -Q.Zhao.“RecentAdvancesinAsymptoticAnalysis”.AnalysisandApplica- tions20(2022),1103–1146

    2022

  88. [96]

    AsymptoticExpansionsforSecond-OrderLinearDifferenceEquations withaTurningPoint

    Z.WangandR.Wong.“AsymptoticExpansionsforSecond-OrderLinearDifferenceEquations withaTurningPoint”.NumerischeMathematik94(2003),147–194

    2003

  89. [97]

    Lineardifferenceequationswithtransitionpoints

    ZWangandRWong.“Lineardifferenceequationswithtransitionpoints”.TheSelectedWorks ofRoderickS.C.Wong,1054–1078

  90. [98]

    UniformAsymptoticExpansionof 𝐽𝜈(𝜈𝑎)viaaDifferenceEquation

    Z.WangandR.Wong.“UniformAsymptoticExpansionof 𝐽𝜈(𝜈𝑎)viaaDifferenceEquation”. NumerischeMathematik91(2002),147–193

    2002

  91. [99]

    The Complex WKB Method for Difference Equations and Airy Functions

    A. Fedotov and F. Klopp. “The Complex WKB Method for Difference Equations and Airy Functions”.SIAMJournalonMathematicalAnalysis51(2019),4413–4447

    2019

  92. [100]

    WKB(Liouville-Green)AnalysisofSecondOrderDifference EquationsandApplications

    J.S.GeronimoandD.T.Smith.“WKB(Liouville-Green)AnalysisofSecondOrderDifference EquationsandApplications”.JournalofApproximationTheory69(1992),269–301

    1992

  93. [101]

    WKB and Turning Point Theory for Second Order Difference Equations: External Fields and Strong Asymptotics for Orthogonal Polynomials

    J. S. Geronimo. “WKB and Turning Point Theory for Second Order Difference Equations: External Fields and Strong Asymptotics for Orthogonal Polynomials”. Operator Theory: AdvancesandApplications154(2004),101–138

    2004

  94. [102]

    SqueezedStatesofLight

    D.F.Walls.“SqueezedStatesofLight”.Nature306(1983),141–146

    1983

  95. [103]

    GenerationofSqueezedStatesbyParametric DownConversion

    L.-A.Wu,H.J.Kimble,J.L.Hall,andH.Wu.“GenerationofSqueezedStatesbyParametric DownConversion”.PhysicalReviewLetters57(1986),2520–2523

    1986

  96. [104]

    ObservationofSqueezedLightwith10-dBQuantum-NoiseReduction

    H.Vahlbruchetal.“ObservationofSqueezedLightwith10-dBQuantum-NoiseReduction”. PhysicalReviewLetters100(2008),033602

    2008

  97. [105]

    ObservationofTwo-ModeSqueezingintheMicrowaveFrequencyDomain

    C. Eichler, D. Bozyigit, C. Lang, M. Baur, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, S. Filipp, and A. Wallraff. “ObservationofTwo-ModeSqueezingintheMicrowaveFrequencyDomain”.PhysicalReview Letters107(2011),113601

    2011

  98. [106]

    StrongMicrowaveSqueez- ingabove1Teslaand1Kelvin

    A.Vaartjes,A.Kringhøj,W.Vine,T.Day,A.Morello,andJ.J.Pla.“StrongMicrowaveSqueez- ingabove1Teslaand1Kelvin”.NatureCommunications15(2024),4229

    2024

  99. [107]

    QuantumEnhancementoftheZero-AreaSagnacInterferometer TopologyforGravitationalWaveDetection

    T.Eberle,S.Steinlechner,J.Bauchrowitz,V.Händchen,H.Vahlbruch,M.Mehmet,H.Müller- Ebhardt,andR.Schnabel.“QuantumEnhancementoftheZero-AreaSagnacInterferometer TopologyforGravitationalWaveDetection”.PhysicalReviewLetters104(2010),251102

    2010

  100. [108]

    Quantum-EnhancedAdvancedLIGODetectorsintheEraofGravitational-Wave Astronomy

    M.Tseetal.“Quantum-EnhancedAdvancedLIGODetectorsintheEraofGravitational-Wave Astronomy”.PhysicalReviewLetters123(2019),231107. REFERENCES 72

    2019

  101. [109]

    Frequency-DependentSqueezingforAdvancedLIGO

    L.McCulleretal.“Frequency-DependentSqueezingforAdvancedLIGO”.PhysicalReview Letters124(2020),171102

    2020

  102. [110]

    Broadband Quantum Enhancement of the LIGO Detectors with Frequency-DependentSqueezing

    D. Ganapathy et al. “Broadband Quantum Enhancement of the LIGO Detectors with Frequency-DependentSqueezing”.PhysicalReviewX13(2023),041021

    2023

  103. [111]

    QuantumTeleportationwithSqueezedVacuumStates

    G.J.MilburnandS.L.Braunstein.“QuantumTeleportationwithSqueezedVacuumStates”. PhysicalReviewA60(1999),937–942

    1999

  104. [112]

    SqueezingasanIrreducibleResource

    S.L.Braunstein.“SqueezingasanIrreducibleResource”.PhysicalReviewA71(2005),055801

    2005

  105. [113]

    QuantumInformationwithContinuousVariables

    S.L.BraunsteinandP.vanLoock.“QuantumInformationwithContinuousVariables”.Rev. Mod.Phys.77(2005),513–577

    2005

  106. [114]

    EncodingaQubitinanOscillator

    D.Gottesman,A.Kitaev,andJ.Preskill.“EncodingaQubitinanOscillator”.PhysicalReview A64(2001),012310

    2001

  107. [115]

    Continuous-variable Quantum Information Processing

    U. Andersen, G. Leuchs, and C. Silberhorn. “Continuous-variable Quantum Information Processing”.Laser&PhotonicsReviews4(2010),337–354

    2010

  108. [116]

    Quantum Error Correction Using Squeezed SchrödingerCatStates

    D. S. Schlegel, F. Minganti, and V. Savona. “Quantum Error Correction Using Squeezed SchrödingerCatStates”.PhysicalReviewA106(2022),022431

    2022

  109. [117]

    RecentProgressonCoherentComputation BasedonQuantumSqueezing

    B.Lu,L.Liu,J. -Y.Song,K.Wen,andC.Wang.“RecentProgressonCoherentComputation BasedonQuantumSqueezing”.AAPPSBulletin33(2023),7

    2023

  110. [118]

    QuantumErrorCorrectionwithSuperposi- tionsofSqueezedFockStates

    Y.Zeng,F.Quijandría,C.Gneiting,andF.Nori.“QuantumErrorCorrectionwithSuperposi- tionsofSqueezedFockStates”.2025.arXiv:2510.04209 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Controlled-Squeeze GateinSuperconductingQuantumCircuits

    N.F.DelGrosso,R.G.Cortiñas,P.I.Villar,F.C.Lombardo,andJ.P.Paz.“Controlled-Squeeze GateinSuperconductingQuantumCircuits”.PhysicalReviewA111(2025),042606

    2025

  112. [120]

    BosonicQuantumErrorCorrectionCodesin SuperconductingQuantumCircuits

    W.Cai,Y.Ma,W.Wang,C. -L.Zou,andL.Sun.“BosonicQuantumErrorCorrectionCodesin SuperconductingQuantumCircuits”.FundamentalResearch1(2021),50–67

    2021

  113. [121]

    EngineeringtheQuantumStatesofLightinaKerr-nonlinear ResonatorbyTwo-PhotonDriving

    S.Puri,S.Boutin,andA.Blais.“EngineeringtheQuantumStatesofLightinaKerr-nonlinear ResonatorbyTwo-PhotonDriving”.npjQuantumInformation3(2017),18

    2017

  114. [122]

    DynamicallyProtectedCat-Qubits:ANewParadigmforUniversalQuantumComputation

    M.Mirrahimi,Z.Leghtas,V.V.Albert,S.Touzard,R.J.Schoelkopf,L.Jiang,andM.H.Devoret. “DynamicallyProtectedCat-Qubits:ANewParadigmforUniversalQuantumComputation”. NewJournalofPhysics16(2014),045014

    2014

  115. [123]

    QuantumMetrologicalAdvan- tageofHigh-OrderSqueezedStates

    R.Gordillo-Hachuel,E.Torrontegui,C.Dios,andR.Puebla.“QuantumMetrologicalAdvan- tageofHigh-OrderSqueezedStates”.2026.arXiv:2604.09958 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  116. [124]

    QuantumComputationoverContinuousVariables

    S.LloydandS.L.Braunstein.“QuantumComputationoverContinuousVariables”.Physical ReviewLetters82(1999),1784–1787

    1999

  117. [125]

    GeneralizedSqueezing

    S.L.BraunsteinandR.I.McLachlan.“GeneralizedSqueezing”.PhysicalReviewA35(1987), 1659–1667

    1987

  118. [126]

    ImpossibilityofNaivelyGeneralizingSqueezed CoherentStates

    R.A.Fisher,M.M.Nieto,andV.D.Sandberg.“ImpossibilityofNaivelyGeneralizingSqueezed CoherentStates”.PhysicalReviewD29(1984),1107–1110

    1984

  119. [127]

    The Multiquantum Jaynes-Cummings Model with the Counter-RotatingTerms

    C. F Lo, K. L Liu, and K. M Ng. “The Multiquantum Jaynes-Cummings Model with the Counter-RotatingTerms”.EurophysicsLetters(EPL)42(1998),1–6

    1998

  120. [128]

    ExactSolutionsforaFamilyofSpin-BosonSystems

    Y.-H.Lee,J.Links,andY. -Z.Zhang.“ExactSolutionsforaFamilyofSpin-BosonSystems”. Nonlinearity24(2011),1975–1986

    2011

  121. [129]

    Multi-PhotonRabiModel:GeneralizedParityandItsApplications

    B.GardasandJ.Dajka.“Multi-PhotonRabiModel:GeneralizedParityandItsApplications”. PhysicsLettersA377(2013),3205–3208

    2013

  122. [130]

    Commenton:“Multi-photonRabiModel:GeneralizedParityandItsApplications

    C.Lo.“Commenton:“Multi-photonRabiModel:GeneralizedParityandItsApplications”by B.GardasandJ.Dajka[Phys.Lett.A377(2013)3205]”.PhysicsLettersA378(2014),1969

    2013

  123. [131]

    Reply to “Comment on: ‘Multi-photon Rabi Model: Generalized ParityandItsApplications’[Phys.Lett.A377(2013)3205]

    B. Gardas and J. Dajka. “Reply to “Comment on: ‘Multi-photon Rabi Model: Generalized ParityandItsApplications’[Phys.Lett.A377(2013)3205]”[Phys.Lett.A378(2014)1969]”. PhysicsLettersA378(2014),1970

    2013

  124. [132]

    InitialStatesofQubit–EnvironmentModelsLeadingtoConserved Quantities

    B.GardasandJ.Dajka.“InitialStatesofQubit–EnvironmentModelsLeadingtoConserved Quantities”.JournalofPhysicsA:MathematicalandTheoretical46(2013),235301

    2013

  125. [133]

    Commenton‘InitialStatesofQubit–EnvironmentModelsLeadingtoConserved Quantities’

    C.F.Lo.“Commenton‘InitialStatesofQubit–EnvironmentModelsLeadingtoConserved Quantities’”.JournalofPhysicsA:MathematicalandTheoretical47(2014),168001. REFERENCES 73

    2014

  126. [134]

    SolvingtheTwo-ModeSqueezedHarmonicOscillatorandThekth-OrderHar- monicGenerationinBargmann–HilbertSpaces

    Y.-Z.Zhang.“SolvingtheTwo-ModeSqueezedHarmonicOscillatorandThekth-OrderHar- monicGenerationinBargmann–HilbertSpaces”.JournalofPhysicsA:Mathematicaland Theoretical46(2013),455302

    2013

  127. [135]

    Commenton‘SolvingtheTwo-ModeSqueezedHarmonicOscillatorandThekth- OrderHarmonicGenerationinBargmann–HilbertSpaces’

    C.F.Lo.“Commenton‘SolvingtheTwo-ModeSqueezedHarmonicOscillatorandThekth- OrderHarmonicGenerationinBargmann–HilbertSpaces’”.JournalofPhysicsA:Mathemat- icalandTheoretical47(2014),078001

    2014

  128. [136]

    Squeezing of Arbitrary Order: The Ups and Downs

    K. Górska, A. Horzela, and F. H. Szafraniec. “Squeezing of Arbitrary Order: The Ups and Downs”.ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyA:Mathematical,PhysicalandEngineeringSciences 470(2014),20140205

    2014

  129. [137]

    Onthe2-Modeandk-PhotonQuantumRabiModels

    Y.-Z.Zhang.“Onthe2-Modeandk-PhotonQuantumRabiModels”.ReviewsinMathematical Physics29(2017),1750013

    2017

  130. [138]

    Thek-PhotonQuantumRabiModel

    D.Braak.“Thek-PhotonQuantumRabiModel”.MathematicalFoundationsforPost-Quantum Cryptography:Crypto-MathCREST.Ed.byT.Takagi,M.Wakayama,N.Kunihiro,K.Tanaka, K.Kimoto,andM.Kudo.Singapore:SpringerNatureSingapore,2026,75–87

    2026

  131. [139]

    Dispersiveregimeofmultiphotonqubit-oscillatorinteractions

    M.AyyashandS.Ashhab.“Dispersiveregimeofmultiphotonqubit-oscillatorinteractions”. Phys.Rev.A112(22025),023713

  132. [140]

    Self-AdjointRealizationsofHigher-OrderSqueezing Operators

    F.Fischer,D.Burgarth,andD.Lonigro.“Self-AdjointRealizationsofHigher-OrderSqueezing Operators”.2025.arXiv:2508.09044 [math-ph]

    2025

  133. [141]

    PropertiesandDynamicsofGeneralizedSqueezedStates

    S.AshhabandM.Ayyash.“PropertiesandDynamicsofGeneralizedSqueezedStates”.New JournalofPhysics27(2025),054104

    2025

  134. [142]

    Commenton‘PropertiesandDynamicsofGeneralized SqueezedStates’

    R.Gordillo-HachuelandR.Puebla.“Commenton‘PropertiesandDynamicsofGeneralized SqueezedStates’”.NewJournalofPhysics28(2026),028002

    2026

  135. [143]

    Finite-DimensionalApproxi- mationsofGeneralizedSqueezing

    S.Ashhab,F.Fischer,D.Lonigro,D.Braak,andD.Burgarth.“Finite-DimensionalApproxi- mationsofGeneralizedSqueezing”.PhysicalReviewA113(2026),013703

    2026

  136. [144]

    ReplytoCommenton‘PropertiesandDynamicsofGeneralized SqueezedStates’

    S.AshhabandM.Ayyash.“ReplytoCommenton‘PropertiesandDynamicsofGeneralized SqueezedStates’”.NewJournalofPhysics28(2026),028001

    2026

  137. [145]

    FractionalSqueezing:SpectraandDynamicsfromGeneralizedSqueezingHamil- tonianwithFractionalOrders

    S.Ashhab.“FractionalSqueezing:SpectraandDynamicsfromGeneralizedSqueezingHamil- tonianwithFractionalOrders”.2026.arXiv:2601.15693 [quant-ph]

    2026

  138. [146]

    Third-OrderSpontaneousParametricdown- ConversioninThinOpticalFibersasaPhoton-TripletSource

    M.Corona,K.Garay-Palmett,andA.B.U’Ren.“Third-OrderSpontaneousParametricdown- ConversioninThinOpticalFibersasaPhoton-TripletSource”.PhysicalReviewA84(2011), 033823

    2011

  139. [147]

    ObservationofThree-PhotonSpontaneousParametricDown- ConversioninaSuperconductingParametricCavity

    C. W. S. Chang, C. Sabín, P. Forn-Díaz, F. Quijandría, A. M. Vadiraj, I. Nsanzineza, G. Jo- hansson,andC.M.Wilson.“ObservationofThree-PhotonSpontaneousParametricDown- ConversioninaSuperconductingParametricCavity”.PhysicalReviewX10(2020),011011

    2020

  140. [148]

    EmissionofPhotonMultipletsbyaDc-BiasedSuperconductingCircuit

    G.C.Ménardetal.“EmissionofPhotonMultipletsbyaDc-BiasedSuperconductingCircuit”. PhysicalReviewX12(2022),021006

    2022

  141. [149]

    Effect of Higher-Order Nonlinearities on Amplification and Squeezing in Josephson Parametric Amplifiers

    S. Boutin, D. M. Toyli, A. V. Venkatramani, A. W. Eddins, I. Siddiqi, and A. Blais. “Effect of Higher-Order Nonlinearities on Amplification and Squeezing in Josephson Parametric Amplifiers”.PhysicalReviewApplied8(2017),054030

    2017

  142. [150]

    Four-andSix-PhotonStimulatedRamanTransitionsforCoherentQubitandQudit Operations

    G. J. Gregory, E. R. Ritchie, A. Quinn, S. Brudney, D. J. Wineland, D. T. C. Allcock, and J. O’Reilly.“Four-andSix-PhotonStimulatedRamanTransitionsforCoherentQubitandQudit Operations”.2026.arXiv:2602.18567 [quant-ph]

    2026

  143. [151]

    DemonstratingQuantumPropertiesofTriplePhotonsGeneratedby 𝜒3 processes

    K.Bencheikhetal.“DemonstratingQuantumPropertiesofTriplePhotonsGeneratedby 𝜒3 processes”.TheEuropeanPhysicalJournalD76(2022),186

    2022

  144. [152]

    UniversalControlofaBosonicModeviaDrive-ActivatedNativeCubic Interactions

    A.M.Erikssonetal.“UniversalControlofaBosonicModeviaDrive-ActivatedNativeCubic Interactions”.NatureCommunications15(2024),2512

    2024

  145. [153]

    Squeezing,TrisqueezingandQuadsqueezinginaHybridOscillator–Spin System

    O.Băzăvanetal.“Squeezing,TrisqueezingandQuadsqueezinginaHybridOscillator–Spin System”.NaturePhysics(2026),757–762

    2026

  146. [154]

    TheMagnusExpansionandSomeofItsApplications

    S.Blanes,F.Casas,J.Oteo,andJ.Ros.“TheMagnusExpansionandSomeofItsApplications”. PhysicsReports470(2009),151–238. REFERENCES 74

    2009

  147. [155]

    UniversalHigh-FrequencyBehaviorofPeriodi- callyDrivenSystems:FromDynamicalStabilizationtoFloquetEngineering

    M.Bukov,L.D’Alessio,andA.Polkovnikov.“UniversalHigh-FrequencyBehaviorofPeriodi- callyDrivenSystems:FromDynamicalStabilizationtoFloquetEngineering”.Advancesin Physics64(2015),139–226

    2015

  148. [156]

    F.W.J.Olver.AsymptoticsandSpecialFunctions.Reprinted.AKPClassics.BocaRaton,Fla.: CRCPress,2010

    2010

  149. [157]

    On Self-adjoint Extensions and Symmetries in QuantumMechanics

    A. Ibort, F. Lledó, and J. M. Pérez-Pardo. “On Self-adjoint Extensions and Symmetries in QuantumMechanics”.AnnalesHenriPoincaré16(2015),2367–2397

    2015

  150. [158]

    QuantumParticleintheWrongBox(or:ThePerils ofFinite-DimensionalApproximations)

    F.Fischer,D.Burgarth,andD.Lonigro.“QuantumParticleintheWrongBox(or:ThePerils ofFinite-DimensionalApproximations)”.Quantum10(2026),1985

    2026

  151. [159]

    L.MandelandE.Wolf.OpticalCoherenceandQuantumOptics.1sted.CambridgeUniversity Press,1995

    1995

  152. [160]

    S.N.Elaydi,ed.AnIntroductiontoDifferenceEquations.ThirdEdition.UndergraduateTexts inMathematics.NewYork,NY:SpringerScience+BusinessMedia,Inc,2005

    2005

  153. [161]

    SpectralproblemsofJacobioperatorsinlimit-circlecase

    B.P.Allahverdiev.“SpectralproblemsofJacobioperatorsinlimit-circlecase”.Mathematical Reports17(2015),81–89

    2015

  154. [162]

    On the spectral theory of dissipative difference operatorsofsecondorder

    B. P. Allakhverdiev and G. S. Guse˘ınov. “On the spectral theory of dissipative difference operatorsofsecondorder”.MathematicsoftheUSSR-Sbornik66(1990),107–125

    1990

  155. [163]

    andenlargeded.,[Nachdr.]SanDiego,Calif.:AcademicPress,1980

    M.ReedandB.Simon.MethodsofModernMathematicalPhysics.1:FunctionalAnalysis.Rev. andenlargeded.,[Nachdr.]SanDiego,Calif.:AcademicPress,1980

    1980

  156. [164]

    G.Teschl.MathematicalMethodsinQuantumMechanics.Vol.99.GraduateStudiesinMathe- matics.Providence,RhodeIsland,2009

    2009

  157. [165]

    GeneralizationoftheHellmann–FeynmanTheo- rem

    J.Esteve,F.Falceto,andC.GarcíaCanal.“GeneralizationoftheHellmann–FeynmanTheo- rem”.PhysicsLettersA374(2010),819–822

    2010

  158. [166]

    W.R.Wasow.AsymptoticExpansionsforOrdinaryDifferentialEquations.Republ.oftheDover ed.firstpubl.in1987.DoverPhoenixEditions.Mineola,NY:DoverPubl,2002

    2002

  159. [167]

    Solutions to the Discrete Airy Equation: Application to ParabolicEquationCalculations

    M. Ehrhardt and R. E. Mickens. “Solutions to the Discrete Airy Equation: Application to ParabolicEquationCalculations”.JournalofComputationalandAppliedMathematics172 (2004),183–206

    2004

  160. [168]

    WKBandTurningPointTheoryforSecond- orderDifferenceEquations

    J.S.Geronimo,O.Bruno,andW.VanAssche.“WKBandTurningPointTheoryforSecond- orderDifferenceEquations”.SpectralMethodsforOperatorsofMathematicalPhysics.Ed.by J.Janas,P.Kurasov,andS.Naboko.Basel:BirkhäuserBasel,2004,101–138

    2004

  161. [169]

    NISTDigitalLibraryofMathematicalFunctions

    “NISTDigitalLibraryofMathematicalFunctions”. https://dlmf.nist.gov/,Release1.2.6 of2026-03-15.F.W.J.Olver,A.B.OldeDaalhuis,D.W.Lozier,B.I.Schneider,R.F.Boisvert, C.W.Clark,B.R.Miller,B.V.Saunders,H.S.Cohl,andM.A.McClain,eds

Pith tools

Reviewed May 21, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.