pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22294 · v2 · pith:INJ4N6DYnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Odd-Parity Chiral Magnons in Collinear Antiferromagnetic Multiferroics: Symmetry Classification and Ferroelectric Switching

Quanchao Du , Zhenlong Zhang Yuanjun Jin , Rui Li , Haibo Xie , Jinlian Lu , Zhe Wang , Zhijun Jiang , Lei Zhang
show 1 more author
Jinyang Ni
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 16:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords odd-parity chiral magnonscollinear antiferromagnetic multiferroicsDzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactionferroelectric switchingmagnon spin splittingantiferromagnetic insulatorsmagnon Hall transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

Intra-sublattice DMI induces odd-parity chiral magnons that reverse with ferroelectric switching in collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies a class of collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics where intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction generates odd-parity chiral magnons. Magnetic group analysis shows the resulting chiral splitting takes three planar odd-parity forms—f-wave, p-wave, and fully-gapped—with dependence on the Néel vector. Because magnons carry no charge, ferroelectric switching can non-volatily reverse their spin splitting, Hall transport, and spin polarization. Density functional theory calculations confirm candidate materials in both two-dimensional and bulk forms. This supplies a magnetoelectric coupling route that avoids the scarcity of direct ferroelectric-magnetic order couplings.

Core claim

In collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics, intra-sublattice DMI induces odd-parity chiral magnons that adopt f-wave, p-wave, or fully-gapped planar forms with Néel vector dependence; these magnon properties reverse under ferroelectric switching, enabling non-volatile electric control of magnon spin splitting, Hall transport, and spin polarization in antiferromagnetic insulators.

What carries the argument

Intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction that produces odd-parity chiral magnons, classified by magnetic group symmetry and computed via spin-wave methods.

If this is right

  • Non-volatile ferroelectric control of magnon spin splitting in antiferromagnetic insulators.
  • Electric-field control of magnon Hall transport and spin polarization.
  • Chiral splitting appears in three distinct planar odd-parity forms whose character depends on the Néel vector.
  • Candidate materials exist from two-dimensional layers to bulk crystals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The symmetry classification could be used to screen additional collinear antiferromagnets for similar magnon behavior.
  • Reversible magnon chirality might allow electric toggling of magnon-based information carriers in insulator devices.
  • The mechanism provides an alternative route to magnetoelectric effects when direct ferroelectric-magnetic order coupling is absent.

Load-bearing premise

The identified multiferroics have dominant intra-sublattice DMI that produces the described odd-parity magnons and that ferroelectric switching reverses these magnon properties without competing effects.

What would settle it

Observation that ferroelectric switching fails to reverse the odd-parity chiral magnon splitting or spin polarization in any of the DFT-validated material candidates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22294 by Haibo Xie, Jinlian Lu, Jinyang Ni, Lei Zhang, Quanchao Du, Rui Li, Zhenlong Zhang Yuanjun Jin, Zhe Wang, Zhijun Jiang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Realizing odd-parity chiral magnons in layered antiferromagnets. Side view of bilayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The isoenergy surfaces for odd-parity chiral magnon bands at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Easy-axis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Easy-plane magnons and ferroelectric switching. (a) The magnon bands weighted by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Odd-parity chiral magnon splitting in material candidates. (a) Crystal and magnetic structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The coupling between ferroelectrics and magnetism presents a promising avenue for low-dissipation spintronic devices. However, such couplings remain rare, and the direct realization of magnetic order driven by ferroelectric switching in insulators continues to pose a significant challenge. Here, we identify a class of collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics in which intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) induces odd-parity chiral magnons that are reversible via ferroelectric switching. Leveraging the charge-neutral nature of magnons, such multiferroics enable non-volatile ferroelectric control over magnon spin splitting, Hall transport, and spin polarization in antiferromagnetic insulators. Remarkably, magnetic group analysis and spin wave calculations reveal that the chiral splitting adopts three planar odd-parity forms, f-wave, p-wave, and fully-gapped types, with an intriguing N\'eel vector dependence. Furthermore, density functional theory calculations validate various material candidates, ranging from two-dimensional to bulk systems. Our work provides new insights into the realization of odd-parity chiral magnons in collinear antiferromagnets and opens new avenues for magnetoelectric coupling mechanisms in multiferroics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies a class of collinear antiferromagnetic multiferroics in which intra-sublattice Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) induces odd-parity chiral magnons that are reversible via ferroelectric switching. Magnetic group analysis and spin-wave calculations reveal three planar odd-parity forms of chiral splitting (f-wave, p-wave, and fully-gapped) with Néel-vector dependence; DFT calculations are used to validate candidate materials ranging from 2D to bulk systems. The work claims this enables non-volatile ferroelectric control over magnon spin splitting, Hall transport, and spin polarization in antiferromagnetic insulators.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the identification of symmetry-allowed odd-parity magnon forms and material candidates offers a concrete mechanism for magnetoelectric coupling in collinear antiferromagnets, extending beyond conventional inter-sublattice DMI scenarios and providing a route to non-volatile magnon control in insulators.

major comments (1)
  1. [Spin-wave calculations and DFT validation sections] The load-bearing assumption that intra-sublattice DMI dominates over inter-sublattice exchange, anisotropy, and dipolar terms (and that ferroelectric switching reverses only the intra-sublattice DMI sign) is not supported by explicit energy-scale comparisons. This must be addressed in the spin-wave section and DFT results to substantiate the predicted non-volatile control and the three odd-parity forms.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Symmetry analysis section] Notation for the three planar odd-parity forms (f-wave, p-wave, fully-gapped) should be defined with explicit functional forms or symmetry labels in the symmetry analysis section for reproducibility.
  2. [DFT section] The manuscript would benefit from a table summarizing the candidate materials, their space groups, and the predicted magnon type for each.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this important point regarding the energy scales. We address the comment below and commit to revisions that strengthen the supporting evidence.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The load-bearing assumption that intra-sublattice DMI dominates over inter-sublattice exchange, anisotropy, and dipolar terms (and that ferroelectric switching reverses only the intra-sublattice DMI sign) is not supported by explicit energy-scale comparisons. This must be addressed in the spin-wave section and DFT results to substantiate the predicted non-volatile control and the three odd-parity forms.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would be strengthened by explicit quantitative comparisons of the relevant energy scales. The present version relies primarily on symmetry classification and the form of the spin-wave Hamiltonian to identify the odd-parity magnon modes, without tabulating the relative magnitudes of intra-sublattice DMI versus inter-sublattice exchange, single-ion anisotropy, and dipolar interactions. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (in both the spin-wave calculations and DFT validation sections) that extracts these parameters from the same DFT calculations used for the candidate materials. We will demonstrate, for each material class, that the intra-sublattice DMI term is the dominant antisymmetric interaction and that ferroelectric polarization reversal changes only its sign while the other terms remain either unchanged or symmetry-forbidden in the collinear antiferromagnetic state. These additions will directly support the stability of the three odd-parity forms and the non-volatile character of the magnon control. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via standard symmetry and spin-wave methods

full rationale

The paper applies magnetic group analysis to classify magnon modes in collinear antiferromagnets and performs spin-wave calculations to obtain the three odd-parity forms, followed by DFT validation of candidate materials. These steps rely on established external frameworks (group theory, linear spin-wave theory, and first-principles electronic structure) rather than any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, self-definitional loop, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equation or claim reduces by construction to its own inputs; the Néel-vector dependence and ferroelectric reversibility follow directly from the symmetry-allowed DMI term without circular redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on standard domain assumptions of condensed-matter physics rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Magnetic group symmetry determines the allowed forms of magnon spin splitting in collinear antiferromagnets
    Invoked to classify the three planar odd-parity forms.
  • domain assumption Intra-sublattice DMI is present and dominant in the described class of multiferroics
    Central premise for inducing the reversible chiral magnons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5775 in / 1398 out tokens · 44688 ms · 2026-06-30T16:26:03.223306+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Odd-Parity Magnons

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Odd-parity magnon splitting is classified in 2D collinear antiferromagnets and induced by circularly polarized light or loop currents, driving topological transitions with chiral edge modes in bilayers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Baltz, A

    V . Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y . Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Ramesh and N

    R. Ramesh and N. A. Spaldin, Multiferroics: progress and prospects in thin films, Nat. Mater.6, 21 (2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    Fiebig, T

    M. Fiebig, T. Lottermoser, D. Meier, and M. Trassin, The evolution of multiferroics, Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 16046 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Schmid, Multi-ferroic magnetoelectrics, Ferroelectrics162, 317 (1994)

    H. Schmid, Multi-ferroic magnetoelectrics, Ferroelectrics162, 317 (1994)

    1994

  5. [5]

    N. A. Spaldin, S.-W. Cheong, and R. Ramesh, Multiferroics: Past, present, and future, Phys. Today63, 38 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    C. Xu, P. Chen, H. Tan, Y . Yang, H. Xiang, and L. Bellaiche, Electric-field switching of magnetic topological charge in type-I multiferroics, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 037203 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    B. B. Van Aken, T. T. M. Palstra, A. Filippetti, and N. A. Spaldin, The origin of ferroelectricity in magnetoelectric YMnO3, Nat. Mater.3, 164 (2004)

    2004

  8. [8]

    Kimura, T

    T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y . Tokura, Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization, Nature426, 55 (2003)

    2003

  9. [9]

    Q. Song, C. A. Occhialini, E. Ergec ¸en, B. Ilyas, D. Amoroso, P. Barone, J. Kapeghian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. S. Botana, S. Picozzi, N. Gedik, and R. Comin, Evidence for a single-layer van der Waals multiferroic, Nature602, 601 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    Ponet, S

    L. Ponet, S. Artyukhin, T. Kain, J. Wettstein, A. Pimenov, A. Shuvaev, X. Wang, S.-W. Cheong, M. Mostovoy, and A. Pimenov, Topologically protected magnetoelectric switching in a multiferroic, Nature607, 81 (2022). 12

    2022

  11. [11]

    S. Dong, H. Xiang, and E. Dagotto, Magnetoelectricity in multiferroics: a theoretical perspective, Nat. Sci. Rev.6, 629 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    J. Wang, J. B. Neaton, H. Zheng, V . Nagarajan, S. B. Ogale, B. Liu, D. Viehland, V . Vaithyanathan, D. G. Schlom, U. V . Waghmare, N. A. Spaldin, K. M. Rabe, M. Wuttig, and R. Ramesh, Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures, Science299, 1719 (2003)

    2003

  13. [13]

    J. Y . Ni, P. S. Wang, J. L. Lu, and H. J. Xiang, Realizing magnetoelectric coupling with hydrogen intercalation, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 117601 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Malashevich and D

    A. Malashevich and D. Vanderbilt, First principles study of improper ferroelectricity in TbMnO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 037210 (2008)

    2008

  15. [15]

    H. J. Xiang, S.-H. Wei, M.-H. Whangbo, and J. L. F. Da Silva, Spin-orbit coupling and ion displacements in multiferroic TbMnO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 037209 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Hayami, H

    S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, and Y . Motome, Asymmetric magnon excitation by spontaneous toroidal ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.85, 053705 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    Y . Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, Twisted magnetic van der Waals bilayers: An ideal platform for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206702 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    R. He, D. Wang, N. Luo, J. Zeng, K.-Q. Chen, and L.-M. Tang, Nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling in antiferromagnetic twisted bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 046401 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y . Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferroelectricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    M. Gu, Y . Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y . Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    W. Zhao, X. Zhou, Z. Guo, T. Zhu, J. Chen, H. Li, Z. Cheng, X. Wang, and W. Wang, Multiferroic phase transition between multiple types of collinear compensated magnets, Nat. Commun. (2026)

    2026

  24. [24]

    W. Sun, C. Yang, X. Wang, S. Huang, and Z. Cheng, Altermagnetic multiferroics with symmetry-locked magnetoelectric coupling, Nat. Mater. (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    Z. Zhu, X. Duan, J. Zhang, B. Hao, I. Zutic, and T. Zhou, Two-dimensional ferroelectric altermagnets: From model to material realization, Nano Lett.25, 9456 (2025). 13

    2025

  26. [26]

    Wang, W.-W

    S. Wang, W.-W. Wang, J. Fan, X. Zhou, X.-P. Li, and L. Wang, Two-dimensional dual-switchable ferroelectric altermagnets: altering electrons and magnons, Nano Lett.25, 14618 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y . Zhu, Y . Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y . Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Jiang, Z

    Y . Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y . Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Q. N. Meier, A. Carta, C. Ederer, and A. Cano, Net and compensated altermagnetism from staggered orbital order: Layer-dependent spin splitting in Srn+1CrnO3n+1, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 116705 (2026)

    2026

  31. [31]

    I. I. Mazin, How to define and calculate the degree of spin polarization in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1427 (1999)

    1999

  32. [32]

    Berakdar, Probing the spin polarization in ferromagnets, Phys

    J. Berakdar, Probing the spin polarization in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 5150 (1999)

    1999

  33. [33]

    A. V . Chumak, V . I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

    2015

  34. [34]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´alez-Hern´andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O.ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Chiral magnons in altermagneticRuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 256703 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solids4, 241 (1958)

    1958

  36. [36]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev.120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  37. [37]

    J. Ni, Y . Jin, Q. Du, and G. Chang, Magnon nonlinearHall effect in two-dimensional antiferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B112, 054424 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Cheng, S

    R. Cheng, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Spin Nernst effect of magnons in collinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 217202 (2016)

    2016

  39. [39]

    V . A. Zyuzin and A. A. Kovalev, Magnon spinNernst effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 217203 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    Bai, R.-W

    L. Bai, R.-W. Zhang, W. Feng, and Y . Yao, AnomalousHall effect in type IV 2D collinear magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 036702 (2025). 14

    2025

  41. [41]

    Liu, S.-D

    Y . Liu, S.-D. Guo, Y . Li, and C.-C. Liu, Two-dimensional fully compensated ferrimagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 116703 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  43. [43]

    N. N. Bogoljubov, V . V . Tolmachov, and D. V .ˇSirkov, A new method in the theory of superconductivity, Fortschr. Phys.6, 605 (1958)

    1958

  44. [44]

    J. G. Valatin, Comments on the theory of superconductivity, Nuovo. Cim.7, 843 (1958)

    1958

  45. [45]

    Q. Du, Z. Zhang, J. Ni, Z. Jiang, and L. Bellaiche, Nonreciprocal magnons in layered antiferromagnets VPX3 (X = S, Se, Te), Phys. Rev. B112, L100408 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Matsumoto and S

    T. Matsumoto and S. Hayami, Nonreciprocal magnons due to symmetric anisotropic exchange interaction in honeycomb antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B101, 224419 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    T. J. Sato and K. Matan, Nonreciprocal magnons in noncentrosymmetric magnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 081007 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    Gitgeatpong, Y

    G. Gitgeatpong, Y . Zhao, P. Piyawongwatthana, Y . Qiu, L. W. Harriger, N. P. Butch, T. J. Sato, and K. Matan, Nonreciprocal magnons and symmetry-breaking in the noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 047201 (2017)

    2017

  49. [49]

    for (i) the derivation of the Berry curvature and (ii) the results of the DFT calculations and bilayer fully antiferromagnets

    See Supplemental Material at ... for (i) the derivation of the Berry curvature and (ii) the results of the DFT calculations and bilayer fully antiferromagnets

  50. [50]

    Kawano, Y

    M. Kawano, Y . Onose, and C. Hotta, Designing Rashba–Dresselhaus effect in magnetic insulators, Commun. Phys.2, 27 (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Okuma, Magnon spin-momentum locking: Various spin vortices and Dirac magnons in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys

    N. Okuma, Magnon spin-momentum locking: Various spin vortices and Dirac magnons in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 107205 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    R. R. Neumann, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, R. Zarzuela, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and A. Mook, Odd-parity- wave magnons and nonrelativistic thermal Edelstein effect, preprint arXiv:2603.05415 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    D. Xiao, M. C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  54. [54]

    W. F. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space groups, Proc. R. Soc. A294, 343 (1966)

    1966

  55. [55]

    Matsumoto and S

    R. Matsumoto and S. Murakami, Theoretical prediction of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 197202 (2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    Onose, T

    Y . Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y . Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y . Tokura, Observation of the magnonHall effect, Science329, 297 (2010). 15

    2010

  57. [57]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Efficient spinSeebeck and spin Nernst effects of magnons in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, L180401 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    K. Wu, J. Dong, M. Zhu, F. Zheng, and J. Zhang, Magnon splitting and magnon spin transport in altermagnets, Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 070702 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    B. Li, A. Mook, A. Raeliarijaona, and A. A. Kovalev, Magnonic analog of the Edelstein effect in antiferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B101, 024427 (2020)

    2020

  60. [60]

    M. J. Grzybowski, C. Autieri, J. Domagala, C. Krasucki, A. Kaleta, S. Kret, K. Gas, M. Sawicki, R. Bo ˙zek, J. Suffczy ´nski, and W. Pacuski, Wurtzite vs. rock-salt MnSe epitaxy: electronic and altermagnetic properties, Nanoscale16, 6259 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Bezzerga, I

    D. Bezzerga, I. Khan, and J. Hong, High performance room temperature multiferroic properties of w-MnSe altermagnet, Adv. Funct. Mater.35, 2505813 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    Zhou, H.-M

    Y . Zhou, H.-M. Zhang, C.-A. Ji, H. Xiang, S. Dong, J. M. Rondinelli, and X.-Z. Lu, Piezomagnetism- driven magnetoelectric coupling in altermagnetic multiferroic K3Cr2F7, Phys. Rev. B112, 094412 (2025)

    2025

  63. [63]

    Xu, X.-Z

    K. Xu, X.-Z. Lu, and H. Xiang, Designing new ferroelectrics with a general strategy, npj Quant. Mater. 2, 1 (2017)

    2017

  64. [64]

    H. Tan, M. Li, H. Liu, Z. Liu, Y . Li, and W. Duan, Two-dimensional ferromagnetic-ferroelectric multiferroics in violation of thed 0 rule, Phys. Rev. B99, 195434 (2019)

    2019

  65. [65]

    Q. Song, S. Stavri ´c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. Antonenko, J. W. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Ergec ¸en, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of ap-wave magnet, Nature642, 64 (2025)

    2025

  66. [66]

    Priessnitz, A

    J. Priessnitz, A. B. Hellenes, R. Comin, and L. ˇSmejkal, Ferroelectric p-wave magnets, preprint arXiv:2603.19107 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    Matsumoto, R

    R. Matsumoto, R. Shindou, and S. Murakami, Thermal Hall effect of magnons in magnets with dipolar interaction, Phys. Rev. B89, 054420 (2014)

    2014

  68. [68]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and P. A. Lee, Theory of the thermal Hall effect in quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 066403 (2010)

    2010

  69. [69]

    P. E. Bl ¨ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  70. [70]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm ¨uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comp. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996). 16

    1996

  71. [71]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev, Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  72. [72]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, V . I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators, Phys. Rev. B52, R5467 (1995)

    1995

  73. [73]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651(R) (1993)

    1993

  74. [74]

    H. J. Xiang, E. J. Kan, S.-H. Wei, M.-H. Whangbo, and X. G. Gong, Predicting the spin-lattice order of frustrated systems from first principles, Phys. Rev. B84, 224429 (2011)

    2011

  75. [75]

    Xiang, C

    H. Xiang, C. Lee, H.-J. Koo, X. Gong, and M.-H. Whangbo, Magnetic properties and energy-mapping analysis, Dalton Trans.42, 823 (2013)

    2013

  76. [76]

    Henkelman, B

    G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. J´onsson, A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths, J. Chem. Phys.113, 9901 (2000). 17 FIG. 1. Realizing odd-parity chiral magnons in layered antiferromagnets. Side view of bilayer antiferromagnets with P preserved (a) and P broken (d) , where blue balls refer to th...

    2000