pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26375 · v1 · pith:HOCLA5M3new · submitted 2026-05-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

Bohr's complementarity

Diego S. Starke , Jonas Maziero , Marcos L. W. Basso , Tabish Qureshi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 21:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum complementarityBohr complementaritycomplementarity relationsquantum uncertainty relationscontextualityquantum foundationsincompatible observablesquantum correlations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Complementarity in quantum mechanics links directly to its foundational postulates via modern quantifications and ties to uncertainty relations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the historical development of Bohr's complementarity from its original formulation to contemporary mathematical expressions. It shows that complementarity relations provide an operational way to quantify trade-offs between incompatible observables and connect this feature to the basic postulates of quantum theory. The review further explores links between complementarity and both uncertainty relations and contextuality, while outlining applications in quantum information and correlations. A sympathetic reader would see these connections as positioning complementarity as central rather than peripheral to quantum foundations. The paper presents this as a coherent evolution supported by recent advancements in the field.

Core claim

Quantum complementarity, beginning with Bohr's formulation, has been quantified through complementarity relations that reveal a profound connection to the foundational postulates of quantum theory, along with operational definitions in terms of incompatible observables, potential links to quantum uncertainty relations and contextuality, and various applications.

What carries the argument

Complementarity relations that quantify the mutual exclusivity of incompatible observables and their trade-offs.

If this is right

  • Complementarity relations can serve as tools to quantify quantum resources and correlations.
  • Operational definitions allow direct experimental tests of complementarity in incompatible measurements.
  • Links to contextuality suggest new ways to classify quantum paradoxes through complementarity measures.
  • Applications extend to quantum information protocols where trade-offs between observables limit performance.
  • The connections unify complementarity with other foundational features like uncertainty principles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the connections hold, complementarity could provide a unified language for discussing measurement disturbance across different quantum scenarios.
  • Further exploration might test whether complementarity relations derive directly from the no-cloning theorem or other no-go results.
  • Applications in quantum computing might use these relations to bound errors in gate operations involving incompatible bases.

Load-bearing premise

The review's selection of historical developments, quantifications, and applications provides a balanced and representative overview of the field without significant omissions.

What would settle it

An experimental result or theoretical derivation showing a quantified complementarity relation with no connection to uncertainty relations or foundational postulates would challenge the claimed links.

read the original abstract

Quantum complementarity is a fundamental feature of quantum systems and has captivated the physics research community for nearly a century, with significant advancements emerging in recent decades. This review traces the historical evolution of the concept of complementarity, beginning with Bohr's original formulation. It then explores its modern quantification through complementarity relations and its profound connection to the foundational postulates of quantum theory. Furthermore, it delves into key related developments, such as the operational definition of complementarity in the context of incompatible observables, its potential links with quantum uncertainty relations and contextuality, its various applications, and other pertinent topics. This review aims to serve physicists interested in quantum resources, quantum correlations, and the foundational principles of quantum mechanics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review that traces the historical development of Bohr's complementarity principle from its original formulation through modern quantifications via complementarity relations, examines its connections to the foundational postulates of quantum theory, discusses operational definitions in the context of incompatible observables, explores links to quantum uncertainty relations and contextuality, reviews applications, and covers other related topics in quantum resources and correlations.

Significance. A balanced review consolidating historical and contemporary perspectives on complementarity would be a useful reference for researchers in quantum foundations, uncertainty relations, and quantum information, particularly if it accurately maps connections without major omissions in the cited literature.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'profound connection to the foundational postulates' is stated without qualification; the review should clarify whether this is interpretive or directly derived from specific postulates in a dedicated section.
  2. The review's selection criteria for historical developments and applications should be stated explicitly early on to allow readers to assess completeness.
  3. Ensure recent (post-2020) literature on complementarity relations and contextuality is included and cross-referenced with the foundational sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment of our review on Bohr's complementarity. The recommendation for minor revision is noted, but the report contains no specific major comments or requests for changes. We therefore have no individual points to address and will proceed with any minor editorial adjustments in the revised manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no derivations or predictions exhibits no circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a review tracing historical evolution of complementarity, modern quantifications, links to uncertainty/contextuality, and applications. No original equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or load-bearing derivations are present. The reader's assessment of score 0.0 is confirmed by the abstract and scope; no self-citation chains or self-definitional steps exist to analyze.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper summarizing existing literature with no original derivations, so it introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5639 in / 981 out tokens · 30393 ms · 2026-06-29T21:12:54.395931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. No-go theorems on simulating uncertainty principle's signatures

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    No-go theorems establish that strong signatures of the uncertainty principle modeled by complementary instruments cannot be simulated by a single measurement even with assistance, and these instruments are necessary a...

  2. Measuring Entanglement in Qubit System

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A concurrence-based measure of entanglement between an internal qubit degree of freedom and an ancilla is extracted from measurable asymmetry in the output channels of two-path interferometers after tracing out the an...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

172 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Wave–particle duality of unpolar- ized photons,

    Abe, N. and K. Edamatsu, 2026, “Wave–particle duality of unpolar- ized photons,” Opt. Express34, 19013. Adesso, G. and F. Illuminati, 2007, “Entanglement in continuous- variable systems: recent advances and current perspectives,” J. Phys. A40,

    2026

  2. [2]

    Violation of the principle of Complementarity, and its implications,

    Afshar, S. S., 2005, “Violation of the principle of Complementarity, and its implications,” Proc. SPIE5866,

    2005

  3. [3]

    Violation of Bohr’s Complementarity: One Slit or Both?,

    Afshar, S. S., 2006, “Violation of Bohr’s Complementarity: One Slit or Both?,” AIP Conf. Proc., V ol.810,

    2006

  4. [4]

    Paradox in Wave-Particle Duality,

    Afshar, S. S., E. Flores, K. F. McDonald, and E. Knoesel, 2007, “Paradox in Wave-Particle Duality,” Found. Phys.37,

    2007

  5. [5]

    Quantum Relativity of Subsystems,

    Ahmad, S. A., T. D. Galley, P. A. Hohn, M. P. E. Lock, and A. R. H. Smith, 2022, “Quantum Relativity of Subsystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 170401. 42 Ahn, D., H.-J. Lee, Y .-H. Moon, and S.-W. Hwang, 2003, Phys. Rev. A67, 012103. Aiello, A., 2023, “A probabilistic view of wave-particle duality for single photons,” Quantum7,

    2022

  6. [6]

    Entanglement of Dirac fields in noninertial frames,

    Alsing, P. M., I. Fuentes-Schuller, R. B. Mann, and T. E. Tessier, 2006, “Entanglement of Dirac fields in noninertial frames,” Phys. Rev. A74, 032326. Angelo, R. M., and A. D. Ribeiro, 2015, “Wave–Particle Duality: An Information-Based Approach,” Found. Phys.45,

    2006

  7. [7]

    Relative Entropy of States of von Neumann Alge- bras,

    Araki, H., 1975, “Relative Entropy of States of von Neumann Alge- bras,” Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.11,

    1975

  8. [8]

    Quantum Observable’s Reality Erasure with Spacelike-Separated Operations,

    Araújo, J. S., D. S. Starke, A. S. Coelho, J. Maziero, G. H. Aguilar, and R. M. Angelo, 2025, “Quantum Observable’s Reality Erasure with Spacelike-Separated Operations,” Phys. Rev. A111, 062425. Arndt, M., O. Nairz, J. V os-Andreae, C. Keller, G. van der Zouw, and A. Zeilinger, 1999, “Wave–Particle Duality of C60 Molecules,” Nature401,

    2025

  9. [9]

    Experimental analysis of the quantum complementarity principle,

    Auccaise, R., R. M. Serra, J. G. Filgueiras, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, and L. C. Céleri, 2012, “Experimental analysis of the quantum complementarity principle,” Phys. Rev. A85, 032121. Avner, S., 2021, “Conceiving Particles as Undulating Granular Sys- tems Allows Fundamentally Realist Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,” Entropy23,

    2012

  10. [10]

    Rela- tions between coherence and path information,

    Bagan, E., J. A. Bergou, S. S. Cottrell, and M. Hillery, 2016, “Rela- tions between coherence and path information,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 160406. Bagan, E., J. Calsamiglia, J. A. Bergou, and M. Hillery, 2018, “Du- ality Games and Operational Duality Relations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 050402. Bagan, E., J. A. Bergou, and M. Hillery, 2020, “Wave-Particle- D...

    2016

  11. [11]

    Complementarity in the Double-Slit Experi- ment: On Simple Realizable Systems for Observing Intermediate Particle-Wave Behavior,

    Bartell, L. S., 1980, “Complementarity in the Double-Slit Experi- ment: On Simple Realizable Systems for Observing Intermediate Particle-Wave Behavior,” Phys. Rev. D21,

    1980

  12. [12]

    Quantitative Wave-Particle Duality Relations from the Density Matrix Properties,

    Basso, M. L. W., D. S. S. Chrysosthemos, and J. Maziero, 2020, “Quantitative Wave-Particle Duality Relations from the Density Matrix Properties,” Quan. Inf. Proc.19,

    2020

  13. [13]

    Complete complementarity relations for multipartite pure states,

    Basso, M. L. W., and J. Maziero, 2020, “Complete complementarity relations for multipartite pure states,” J. Phys. A53, 465301. Basso, M. L. W., and J. Maziero, 2021, “Complete Complementarity Relations and Their Lorentz Invariance,” Proc. A477, 20210058. Basso, M. L. W., and J. Maziero, 2021, “Complete complementarity relations in curved spacetimes,” Phy...

    2020

  14. [14]

    Complete complementarity relations: Connections with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen realism and decoherence, and extension to mixed quantum states,

    Basso, M. L. W., and J. Maziero, 2021, “Complete complementarity relations: Connections with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen realism and decoherence, and extension to mixed quantum states,” EPL135, 60002. Basso, M. L. W., and J. Maziero, 2021, “An uncertainty view on com- plementarity and a complementarity view on uncertainty,” Quan- tum Inf. Process.20,

    2021

  15. [15]

    Entanglement Monotones from Complementarity Relations,

    Basso, M. L. W., and J. Maziero, 2022, “Entanglement Monotones from Complementarity Relations,” J. Phys. A55, 355304. Basso, M. L. W., and J. Maziero, 2022, “Entanglement Monotones Connect Distinguishability and Predictability,” Phys. Lett. A425, 127875. Basso, M. L. W., and J. Maziero, 2022, “Operational connection be- tween predictability and entangleme...

    2022

  16. [16]

    Unveil- ing quantum complementarity tradeoffs in relativistic scenarios,

    Basso, M. L. W., I. L. Paiva, and P. R. Dieguez, 2024, “Unveil- ing quantum complementarity tradeoffs in relativistic scenarios,” Phys. Rev. A109, 062207. Baumgratz, T., M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, 2014, “Quantifying Coherence,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 140401. Beller, M., 1999,Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution (University of Chicago press, Chicag...

    2024

  17. [17]

    Generalized Concur- rence Measure for Faithful Quantification of Multiparticle Pure State Entanglement Using Lagrange’s Identity and Wedge Prod- uct,

    Bhaskara, V . S., and P. K. Panigrahi, 2017, “Generalized Concur- rence Measure for Faithful Quantification of Multiparticle Pure State Entanglement Using Lagrange’s Identity and Wedge Prod- uct,” Quan. Inf. Proc.16,

    2017

  18. [18]

    A measure of physical reality

    Bilobran, L. O. and R. M. Angelo, 2015, “A measure of physical reality” Europhys. Lett.112, 40005. Bimonte, G., and R. Musto, 2003, “On Interferometric Duality in Multibeam Experiments,” J. Phys. A36, 11481. Bimonte, G., and R. Musto, 2003, “Comment on ‘Quantitative Wave- Particle Duality in Multibeam Interferometers,’” Phys. Rev. A67, 066101. Biswas T., ...

    2015

  19. [19]

    Quantifying quantumness in three-flavor neutrino oscilla- tions,

    Bittencourt, V . A. S. V ., M. Blasone, S. D. Siena, and C. Matrella, 2024, “Quantifying quantumness in three-flavor neutrino oscilla- tions,” Eur. Phys. J. C84,

    2024

  20. [20]

    Complementarity and the Uncertainty Relations,

    Bjork, G., J. Soderholm, A. Trifonov, T. Tsegaye, and A. Karlsson, 1999, “Complementarity and the Uncertainty Relations,” Phys. Rev. A60,

    1999

  21. [21]

    Complete com- plementarity relations for quantum correlations in neutrino oscil- lations with CP violation,

    Blasone, M., S. D. Siena, and C. Matrella, 2024, “Complete com- plementarity relations for quantum correlations in neutrino oscil- lations with CP violation,” Int. J. Quan. Inf.22, 2450003. Blasone, M., S. D. Siena, G. Lambiase, C. Matrella, and B. Micci- ola, 2025, “Complete complementarity relations in tree level QED processes,” Phys. Rev. D111, 016007....

    2024

  22. [22]

    Braunstein, S. L. and P. van Loock, 2005, ‘´Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys.77,

    2005

  23. [23]

    The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Develop- ment of Atomic Theory,

    Bohr, N., 1928, “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Develop- ment of Atomic Theory,” Nature121,

    1928

  24. [24]

    Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?,

    Bohr, N., 1935, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?,” Phys. Rev.48,

    1935

  25. [25]

    Discussions with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics,

    Bohr, N., 1949, “Discussions with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics,” In: Albert Einstein: Philosopher- Scientist (Open Court Publishing Company, Evanston). 43 Bohr, N., 1950, “On the Notions of Causality and Complementarity,” Science111,

    1949

  26. [26]

    On the connection between complementarity and uncertainty princi- ples in the Mach–Zehnder interferometric setting,

    Bosyk, G. M., M. Portesi, F. Holik, and A. Plastino, 2013, “On the connection between complementarity and uncertainty princi- ples in the Mach–Zehnder interferometric setting,” Phys. Scr.87, 065002. Bu, K., L. Li, J. Wu, and S.-M. Fei, 2018, “Duality Relation be- tween Coherence and Path Information in the Presence of Quan- tum Memory,” J. Phys. A51, 0853...

    2013

  27. [27]

    Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle,

    Busch, P., Heinonen, T., Lahti, P., 2007, “Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle,” Phys. Rep.452,

    2007

  28. [28]

    Bound entanglement is not Lorentz invariant,

    Caban, P., and J. Rembielinski, 2006, “Bound entanglement is not Lorentz invariant,” Phys. Rev. A74, 042103. Caban, P., and B. C. Hiesmayr, 2023, “Bound entanglement is not Lorentz invariant,” Sci. Rep.13, 11189. Catani, L., M. Leifer, G. Scala, D. Schmid, and R. W. Spekkens, 2023, “Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory,”...

    2006

  29. [29]

    Aspects of the phenomenology of interference that are gen- uinely nonclassical,

    Catani, L., M. Leifer, G. Scala, D. Schmid, and R. W. Spekkens, 2023, “Aspects of the phenomenology of interference that are gen- uinely nonclassical,” Phys. Rev. A,108022207. Cepollaro, C., A. Akil , P. Cieslinski, A.-C. de la Hamette, C. Brukner, 2025, “Sum of Entanglement and Subsystem Coherence Is Invariant under Quantum Reference Frame Transformation...

    2023

  30. [30]

    Experimental investigation of wave-particle duality relations in asymmetric beam interference,

    Chen, D.-X., Y . Zhang, J.-L. Zhao, Q.-C. Wu, Y .-L. Fang, C.-P. Yang, and F. Nori, 2022, “Experimental investigation of wave-particle duality relations in asymmetric beam interference,” npj Quan. Inf. 8,

    2022

  31. [31]

    On Complementarity and Distribution of Imaginarity in Finite Dimensions,

    Chen, B., X. Huang, and S.-M. Fei, 2024, “On Complementarity and Distribution of Imaginarity in Finite Dimensions,” Results in Physics60, 107671. Chen, D.-D., D.-D. Dong, X.-K. Songet al., 2025, “Gravitationally induced uncertainty relation, quantum coherence and complete complementarity relation,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus140,

    2024

  32. [32]

    Quantum mutual information, coherence and unified relations of top quarks in QCD processes,

    Chen, D. D., X.-K. Song, L. Ye, and D. Wang, 2026, “Quantum mutual information, coherence and unified relations of top quarks in QCD processes,” Phys. Lett. B876, 140426. Chiribella, G., G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and B. Valiron, 2013, “Quantum computations without definite causal structure,” Phys. Rev. A88, 022318. Chitambar, E. and G. Gour, 2019, “Qu...

    2026

  33. [33]

    Quantum Simulation of the Generalized-Entangled Quantum Eraser and the Related Complete Complementarity Relations,

    Chrysosthemos, D. S. S., M. L. W. Basso, and J. Maziero, 2023, “Quantum Simulation of the Generalized-Entangled Quantum Eraser and the Related Complete Complementarity Relations,” Phys. Scr.98, 035107. Clauser, J. F., M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, 1969, “Pro- posed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.23,

    2023

  34. [34]

    Equivalence of wave–particle duality to entropic uncertainty,

    Coles, P., J. Kaniewski, and S. Wehner, 2014, “Equivalence of wave–particle duality to entropic uncertainty,” Nat. Commun.5,

    2014

  35. [35]

    Entropic Framework for Wave-Particle Duality in Multipath Interferometers,

    Coles, P., 2016, “Entropic Framework for Wave-Particle Duality in Multipath Interferometers,” Phys. Rev. A93, 062111. Coles, P. J., M. Berta, M. Tomamichel, and S. Wehner, 2017, “En- tropic uncertainty relations and their applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015002. Crease, R. P., 2002, “The Most Beautiful Experiment,” Phys. World 15,

    2016

  36. [36]

    Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment with relativistic massive particles,

    Czachor, M., 1997, “Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment with relativistic massive particles,” Phys. Rev. A55,

    1997

  37. [37]

    Information content of systems as a physical principle,

    Czekaj, L., M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, 2017, “Information content of systems as a physical principle,” Phys. Rev. A95, 022119. Das, S., C. Mukhopadhyay, S. S. Roy, S. Bhattacharya, A. Sen(De) and U. Sen, 2020, “Wave-Particle Duality Employing Quantum Coherence in Superposition with Non-Orthogonal Pointers,” J. Phys. A53, 115301, Das, S....

    2017

  38. [38]

    The Scattering of Electrons by a Single Crystal of Nickel,

    Davisson, C., and L. H. Germer, 1927, “The Scattering of Electrons by a Single Crystal of Nickel,” Nature119,

    1927

  39. [39]

    Reflection and Refraction of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel,

    Davisson, C. J., and L. H. Germer, 1928, “Reflection and Refraction of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences14,

    1928

  40. [40]

    Analysis of Mul- tipath Interference in Three-Slit Experiments,

    de Broglie, L., 1924,Recherches sur la théorie des quanta(Doctoral dissertation, Migration-université en cours d’affectation). De Raedt, H., K. Michielsen, and K. Hess, 2012, “Analysis of Mul- tipath Interference in Three-Slit Experiments,” Phys. Rev. A85, 012101 De Zela, F., 2014, “Relationship between the Degree of Polarization, Indistinguishability, an...

    1924

  41. [41]

    Information-reality com- plementarity: The role of measurements and quantum reference frames,

    Dieguez, P. R. and R. M. Angelo, 2018, “Information-reality com- plementarity: The role of measurements and quantum reference frames,” Phys. Rev. A97, 022107. Dieguez, P. R., J. R. Guimarães, J. P. S. Peterson, R. M. Angelo, and R. M. Serra, 2022, “Experimental Assessment of Physical Real- ism in a Quantum-Controlled Device,” Commun. Phys.5,

    2018

  42. [42]

    Overlap and Distinguishability of Quantum States,

    Dieks, D., 1988, “Overlap and Distinguishability of Quantum States,” Phys. Lett. A126,

    1988

  43. [43]

    Universal conservation laws of the wave- particle-entanglement triad: theory and experiment,

    Ding, Z.,et al., 2025, “Universal conservation laws of the wave- particle-entanglement triad: theory and experiment,” Light Sci. Appl.14,

    2025

  44. [44]

    Wave- Particle Duality of Many-Body Quantum States,

    Dittel, C., G. Dufour, G. Weihs, and A. Buchleitner, 2021, “Wave- Particle Duality of Many-Body Quantum States,” Phys. Rev. X11, 031041. Dong, M.-X., D.-S. Ding, Y .-C. Yu, Y .-H. Ye, W.-H. Zhang, E.-Z. Li, L. Zeng,et al., 2020, “Temporal Wheeler’s Delayed-Choice Ex- periment Based on Cold Atomic Quantum Memory,” npj Quantum Inf.6,

    2021

  45. [45]

    Complementarity and Afshar's experiment

    Drezet, A., 2005, “Complementarity and Afshar’s Experiment,” arXiv:quant-ph/0508091. Drezet, A., 2010, “Paradox or Non-Paradox in Wave-Particle Dual- ity,” arXiv:1008.4261. Dürr, S., T. Nonn, and G. Rempe, 1998, “Fringe Visibility and Which-Way Information in an Atom Interferometer,” Phys. Rev. Lett.81,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  46. [46]

    Quantitative Wave-Particle Duality in Multibeam In- 44 terferometers,

    Dürr, S, 2001, “Quantitative Wave-Particle Duality in Multibeam In- 44 terferometers,” Phys. Rev. A64, 042113. Dürr, S., and G. Rempe, 2000, “Can Wave–Particle Duality Be Based on the Uncertainty Relation?,” Am. J. Phys.68,

    2001

  47. [47]

    Entanglement and nonlocality of a single relativistic particle,

    Dunningham J., V . Palge, and V . Vedral, 2009, “Entanglement and nonlocality of a single relativistic particle,” Phys. Rev. A80, 044302. Eberly, J. H., X.-F. Qian, and A. N. Vamivakas, 2017, “Polarization Coherence Theorem,” Optica4,

    2009

  48. [48]

    Über Einen Die Erzeugung Und Verwandlung Des Lichtes Betreffenden Heuristischen Gesichtspunkt,

    Einstein, A., 1905, “Über Einen Die Erzeugung Und Verwandlung Des Lichtes Betreffenden Heuristischen Gesichtspunkt,” Annalen der Physik17,

    1905

  49. [49]

    Can Quantum- Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Com- plete?

    Einstein, A., B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, 1935, “Can Quantum- Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Com- plete?” Phys. Rev.47,

    1935

  50. [50]

    The Duality in Matter and Light,

    Englert, B-G. M. O. Scully, H. Walther, 1994, “The Duality in Matter and Light," Sci. Am.271,

    1994

  51. [51]

    Com- plementarity and Uncertainty,

    Englert, Berthold-Georg, M. O. Scully, and H. Walther, 1995, “Com- plementarity and Uncertainty,” Nature375,

    1995

  52. [52]

    Fringe Visibility and Which-Way Informa- tion: An Inequality,

    Englert, B.-G., 1996, “Fringe Visibility and Which-Way Informa- tion: An Inequality,” Phys. Rev. Lett.77,

    1996

  53. [53]

    Quantum Era- sure in Double-Slit Interferometers with Which-Way Detectors,

    Englert, B-G., M. O. Scully, and H. Walther, 1999, “Quantum Era- sure in Double-Slit Interferometers with Which-Way Detectors,” Am. J. Phys.67,

    1999

  54. [54]

    Quantitative Quantum Era- sure,

    Englert, B.-G., and J. A. Bergou, 2000, “Quantitative Quantum Era- sure,” Opt. Comm.179,

    2000

  55. [55]

    On Mechanisms That Enforce Complementarity,

    Englert, B-G., M. O. Scully, and H. Walther, 2000, “On Mechanisms That Enforce Complementarity,” J. Mod. Opt.47,

    2000

  56. [56]

    Wave-Particle Duality in Multi-Path Interferometers: General Concepts and Three-Path Interferometers,

    Englert, B.-G., D. Kaszlikowski, L. C. Kwek, and W. H. Chee, 2008, “Wave-Particle Duality in Multi-Path Interferometers: General Concepts and Three-Path Interferometers,” Int. J. Quan. Info.06,

    2008

  57. [57]

    Foundational Problems of Quan- tum Theory: Novel Approach to Temporal Probability Density,

    Erol, M., and M. E. Kuzucu, 2022, “Foundational Problems of Quan- tum Theory: Novel Approach to Temporal Probability Density,” J. Phys.6,

    2022

  58. [58]

    Beugung von Moleku- larstrahlen,

    Estermann, I., and O. Stern, 1930, “Beugung von Moleku- larstrahlen,” Z. Physik61,

    1930

  59. [59]

    Complementary relation of quantum coherence and quantum cor- relations in multiple measurements,

    Fan, Z., Y . Peng, Y .-R. Zhang, S. Liu, L.-Z. Mu, and H. Fan, 2019, “Complementary relation of quantum coherence and quantum cor- relations in multiple measurements,” Sci. Rep.9,

    2019

  60. [60]

    Quantifying coherence of quantum channels via the Hilbert-Schmidt norm and generalized Wigner- Yanase-Dyson skew information,

    Fan, Y ., and L. Li, 2026, “Quantifying coherence of quantum channels via the Hilbert-Schmidt norm and generalized Wigner- Yanase-Dyson skew information,” Phys. Lett. A,586, 131690. Faye, J., 1991,Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy, Science and Philosophy, V ol. 6 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht). Fedoseev, V ., Lin, H., Yu-Kun L., Lee, Y . K., Lyu, J. ...

    2026

  61. [61]

    Entanglement, which-way measurements, and a quantum erasure,

    Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., and Sands, M., 1965,The Feyn- man Lectures on Physics, V ol. III:Quantum Mechanics(Addison– Wesley, Reading). Ferrari, C., and B. Braunecker, 2010, “Entanglement, which-way measurements, and a quantum erasure,” Am. J. Phys.78,

    1965

  62. [62]

    Why Kastner Analysis Does Not Apply to a Modified Afshar Experiment,

    Flores, E., and E. Knoesel, 2007, “Why Kastner Analysis Does Not Apply to a Modified Afshar Experiment,” Proc. SPIE6664, The Nature of Light: What Are Photons?, 66640O. Flores, E. V ., 2009, “Modified Afshar Experiment: Calculations,” Proc. SPIE7421, 74210W. Flores, E. V ., and J. M. De Tata, 2010, “Complementarity Paradox Solved: Surprising Consequences,...

    2007

  63. [63]

    Relativistic entanglement of two massive particles,

    Folse, H. J., 1988,The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity(North-Holland Personal Library, Amsterdam). Friis, N.. R. A. Bertlmann, M. Huber, and B. C. Hiesmayr, 2010, “Relativistic entanglement of two massive particles,” Phys. Rev. A81, 042114. Fu, S., and S. Luo, 2022, “From wave-particle duality to wave- particle-mixedness trialit...

    1988

  64. [64]

    Experimental Test of the Relation between Coherence and Path Information,

    Gao, J., Z. Jiao, C. RC10148 StarkeHu, L. Qiao, R. Ren, H. Tang, Z. Ma, S. Fei, V . Vedral, and X. Jin., 2018, “Experimental Test of the Relation between Coherence and Path Information,” Commun. Phys.1,

    2018

  65. [65]

    Quantum Interference of Large Organic Molecules,

    Gerlich, S., S. Eibenberger, M. Tomandl, S. Nimmrichter, K. Horn- berger, P. J. Fagan, J. Tüxen, M. Mayor, and M. Arndt, 2011, “Quantum Interference of Large Organic Molecules,” Nat. Com- mun.2,

    2011

  66. [66]

    Exact Mapping of Quantum Waves between Unruh’s and Afshar’s Setup (Reply to W. Unruh),

    Georgiev, D. D., 2007, “Exact Mapping of Quantum Waves between Unruh’s and Afshar’s Setup (Reply to W. Unruh),” Prog. Phys.3,

    2007

  67. [67]

    Single Photon Experiments and Quantum Complementarity,

    Georgiev, D. D., 2007, “Single Photon Experiments and Quantum Complementarity,” Prog. Phys.2,

    2007

  68. [68]

    Quantum Histories and Quantum Comple- mentarity,

    Georgiev, Danko, 2012, “Quantum Histories and Quantum Comple- mentarity,” ISRN Mathematical Physics2012,

    2012

  69. [69]

    One- Particle and Two-Particle Visibilities in Bipartite Entangled Gaus- sian States,

    Georgiev, D., L. Bello, A. Carmi, and E. Cohen, 2021, “One- Particle and Two-Particle Visibilities in Bipartite Entangled Gaus- sian States,” Phys. Rev. A103, 062211. Gergely, B., and H. Batelaan, 2022, “Simulation of Afshar’s Double Slit Experiment,” Found. Phys.52,

    2021

  70. [70]

    Quantum me- chanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,

    Giacomini, F. , E. Castro-Ruiz, and C. Brukner, 2019, “Quantum me- chanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames,” Nature Communications10,

    2019

  71. [71]

    Quantum Entanglement of Moving Bodies,

    Gingrich, R. M., and C. Adami, 2002, “Quantum Entanglement of Moving Bodies,” Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 270402. Gingrich, R. M., A. J. Bergou, and C. Adami, 2003, “Entangled light in moving frames,” Phys. Rev. A68, 042102. Gour, G., and C. M. Scandolo, 2020, “Dynamical Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180505. Grangier, P., G. Roger, and A. Aspect, 1986, “Exp...

    2002

  72. [72]

    Simultaneous wave and particle knowledge in a neutron interferometer,

    Greenberger, D. M., and A. Yasin, 1988, “Simultaneous wave and particle knowledge in a neutron interferometer,” Phys. Lett. A128,

    1988

  73. [73]

    Colloquium: Incompatible measurements in quantum informa- tion science,

    Gühne O., E. Haapasalo , T. Kraft, J.-P. Pellonpää, and R. Uola, 2023, “Colloquium: Incompatible measurements in quantum informa- tion science,” Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 011003. Helstrom, C. W., 1976,Quantum detection and estimation theory (Academic Press, USA). Hellmuth, T., H. Walther, A. Zajonc, and W. Schleich, 1987, “Delayed-Choice Experiments in Quantum I...

    2023

  74. [74]

    Multipartite entanglement measure for all discrete systems,

    Hiesmayr, B. C., and M. Huber, (2008), “Multipartite entanglement measure for all discrete systems,” Phys. Rev. A78, 012342 (2008). Hillery, M., 2021, “Partial Particle and Wave Information and Weak Duality Games,” J. Phys. A54, 495301. Holton, Gerald, 1988, “The Roots of Complementarity,” Daedalus 117,

    2008

  75. [75]

    Delayed-Choice Quantum Erasure with Nonlocal Temporal Double-Slit Interference,

    Honner, J., 1987,The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics(Clarendon Press, Oxford). Hong, L., Y . Chen, and L. Chen, 2023, “Delayed-Choice Quantum Erasure with Nonlocal Temporal Double-Slit Interference,” New J. Phys.25, 053014. Horodecki, M., P. Horodecki, and J. Oppenheim, 2003, “Reversible transformations from pure to...

    1987

  76. [76]

    Quantum Entanglement

    Horodecki, R., P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, 2009, “Quantum Entanglement.” Rev. Mod. Phys.81,

    2009

  77. [77]

    Quantum complementarity from a measurement-based perspective,

    Howard, D., 1994,What Makes a Classical Concept Classical?,in Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht). Huang, S., W.-B. Liu, Y . Zhao, H.-L. Yin, Z.-B. Chen, and S. Wu, 2024, “Quantum complementarity from a measurement-based perspective,” Phys. Rev. A109, 022235. Huygens, C., 1690,Traité de la lumière(Pieter van der Aa, Le...

    1994

  78. [78]

    Two interferometric complementarities,

    Jaeger, G., A. Shimony, and L. Vaidman, 1995, “Two interferometric complementarities,” Phys. Rev. A51,

    1995

  79. [79]

    Generalized complementarity re- lations in composite quantum systems of arbitrary dimensions,

    Jakob, M and J. A. Bergou, 2006, “Generalized complementarity re- lations in composite quantum systems of arbitrary dimensions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B20,

    2006

  80. [80]

    Complementarity and entangle- ment in bipartite qudit systems,

    Jakob, M., and J. A. Bergou, 2007, “Complementarity and entangle- ment in bipartite qudit systems,” Phys. Rev. A76, 052107. Jakob, M., and J. A. Bergou, 2010, “Quantitative complementarity relations in bipartite systems: entanglement as a physical reality.” Opt. Comm.283,

    2007

Showing first 80 references.