pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27295 · v1 · pith:CHHGJLJInew · submitted 2026-05-26 · 💻 cs.CV

Gemini Embedding 2: A Native Multimodal Embedding Model from Gemini

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords embeddinggeminiacrossmultimodalperformancemodeltasksarts
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We introduce Gemini Embedding 2, a native multimodal embedding model that allows embedding video, audio, image, and text modalities in a unified representation space. We leverage the multimodal capabilities of Gemini to produce embeddings for arbitrary combinations of interleaved inputs across all these modalities that generalize well across a wide variety of tasks. Applying large-scale contrastive learning in a multi-task multi-stage training setup, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on key embedding benchmarks including unimodal, cross-modal, and multimodal retrieval spanning a diverse set of tasks. We show that our embedding model demonstrates strong performance (with a score of 62.9 R@1 on MSCOCO, 68.8 NDCG@10 on Vatex, 69.9 on MTEB multilingual and 84.0 on MTEB Code) across a variety of tasks surpassing the performance of specialized models. These unified capabilities make Gemini Embedding 2 a promising candidate for downstream use cases such as RAG, recommendation and search. Furthermore, its robust zero-shot performance across distinct fields - from astronomy and bioscience to fine arts and the culinary arts - establishes it as a highly reliable, out-of-the-box representation even for specialized domains.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Traits Run Deeper: Trait-Specific Asymmetric Fusion for Personality Assessment

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Traits Run Deeper proposes MFR, TSMF asymmetric fusion, and DCPR modules to improve multimodal personality assessment, claiming 25% MSE reduction and first place on AVI Challenge 2026.

  2. The Token Tax of Epistemic Accuracy: Comparing RAG and Long-Context Architectures for Document-Grounded Generative AI Applications

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Long-context prompting reached 73.1% correctness versus 65.4% for semantic RAG at 26 times the token cost across 972 answers in an expert-validated manufacturing benchmark.