pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28756 · v1 · pith:65A76YHZnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ✦ hep-ph

Critique of Breit-Wigner resonance scattering

Philip D. Mannheim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords Breit-Wigner resonancePT symmetrysquare well scatteringcomplex energy polesresonance scatteringunstable particlesphase shift
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Breit-Wigner complex pole is not an energy eigenvalue and produces exponentially growing wave functions, while PT symmetry yields conjugate energy pairs with one observable resonance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper solves the square well scattering problem to test the standard Breit-Wigner phase shift form tan delta equals Gamma1 over E1 minus E. This form fails to always match the real-energy amplitude, allows negative Gamma1, places the pole E_BW at a non-eigenvalue, and assigns decaying-energy states spatial wave functions that grow exponentially. PT symmetry of the potential instead requires solutions in conjugate pairs E∓ equals E2 ∓ i Gamma2, with the lower member unequal to E_BW, producing a time-independent probability amplitude that neither grows nor decays and only one observable physical resonance.

Core claim

Because of its antilinear PT symmetry, solutions to the square well Schrödinger equation appear in complex conjugate energy pairs E∓ = E2 ∓ i Γ2 with E− ≠ E_BW, giving a time-independent probability amplitude that neither grows nor decays in time or space and leading to just one now observable physical resonance.

What carries the argument

Antilinear PT symmetry of the square well potential, which forces scattering solutions to appear in conjugate energy pairs rather than isolated complex poles.

If this is right

  • The standard identification of the Breit-Wigner pole E_BW with an unstable physical particle is invalid.
  • Energy-decaying states must be rejected if their spatial wave functions grow exponentially.
  • Scattering data yield only one observable resonance rather than two from conjugate pairs.
  • The phase-shift parameter Gamma1 can take negative values without violating unitarity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Resonance analyses in other short-range potentials may need to replace isolated complex poles with PT-symmetric conjugate pairs.
  • Time-independent probability amplitudes allow resonances to be treated as stationary states for probability calculations.
  • Reinterpretation of existing particle data could reduce the number of reported resonances by half in some channels.

Load-bearing premise

The square well potential and its PT symmetry properties represent the essential physics in realistic resonance scattering problems where the Breit-Wigner approach is applied.

What would settle it

Measurement of an exponentially growing spatial wave function for a resonance state, or detection of two distinct observable resonances corresponding to a conjugate energy pair, would test the claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28756 by Philip D. Mannheim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: we plot the function Γ(k) = − 1 tan(ka) − tan(ka) (3.7) using the convenient simplification of setting both ℏ 2/2m and a to one. For every possible k there is a value for Γ(k), and as we see Γ(k) is not actually required to be positive, and it could be negative. In terms of each such k and any given V0 we can then find an associated K, to then fix the energy dependence of the relevant δ via (3.2). 2 4 6 8 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: tan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Exact real [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Exact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the standard Breit-Wigner approach to scattering the phase shift is to have a form $\tan\delta_{\rm BW} =\Gamma_1/(E_1-E)$ at a real energy resonance. This leads to complex energy poles in the scattering amplitude at $E_{\rm BW}=E_1-i\Gamma_1$, poles that are identified with unstable physical particles. By solving the square well scattering problem we identify some challenges to this approach. We find that setting $\tan\delta_{\rm BW} =\Gamma_1/(E_1-E)$ is not always a good description of the real energy scattering amplitude, that $\Gamma_1$ can be negative, that $E_{\rm BW}$ is not in fact an energy eigenvalue (and thus not a physical particle), and that states that decay in energy possess spatial wave functions that unacceptably grow exponentially. All of this is resolved by noting that because of its antilinear $PT$ symmetry solutions to the square well Schr\"odinger equation appear in complex conjugate energy pairs $E_{\mp}=E_2\mp i \Gamma_2$ with $E_- \neq E_{\rm BW}$, doing so in a way that gives a time independent probability amplitude that neither grows nor decays in time or space, and leads to just one now observable physical resonance not two.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper critiques the Breit-Wigner parametrization of resonance scattering by exactly solving the square-well Schrödinger equation. It reports that the form tan δ_BW = Γ1/(E1 - E) does not always match the real-energy scattering amplitude, that Γ1 can be negative, that the complex pole E_BW is not an energy eigenvalue, and that energy-decaying states produce spatially exponentially growing wave functions. These issues are claimed to be resolved by PT symmetry, which produces complex-conjugate eigenvalue pairs E∓ = E2 ∓ i Γ2 (with E- ≠ E_BW) whose associated probability density is time-independent and yields only a single observable physical resonance.

Significance. If the central claims were shown to hold beyond the square-well model, the work would challenge the standard identification of Breit-Wigner poles with physical resonances in particle phenomenology. The explicit square-well solutions constitute a reproducible calculation, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that the PT-symmetric construction reproduces the finite-lifetime exponential decay required of resonances.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the assertion that PT-symmetric solutions produce 'a time independent probability amplitude that neither grows nor decays in time or space' is incompatible with the defining property of a resonance, namely |ψ(t)|² ∼ e^{-Γ t} with Γ > 0. This internal mismatch means the proposed alternative does not describe the decaying states that Breit-Wigner is intended to model.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on square-well solution): the leap from the square-well results to the general claim that 'E_BW is not in fact an energy eigenvalue (and thus not a physical particle)' and that Breit-Wigner is therefore invalidated rests on a single exactly solvable model without demonstrated robustness under changes to the potential or comparison to standard resonance calculations in the literature.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation: the subscripts on E∓, E2, Γ2 are introduced without an explicit definition of the indexing convention used for the PT pair.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review. We respond to each major comment below and note revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the assertion that PT-symmetric solutions produce 'a time independent probability amplitude that neither grows nor decays in time or space' is incompatible with the defining property of a resonance, namely |ψ(t)|² ∼ e^{-Γ t} with Γ > 0. This internal mismatch means the proposed alternative does not describe the decaying states that Breit-Wigner is intended to model.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that our PT-symmetric construction yields time-independent probability densities, which does not reproduce the exponential decay |ψ(t)|² ∼ e^{-Γ t}. The manuscript's focus is on resolving inconsistencies in the Breit-Wigner approach, such as possible negative widths, non-eigenvalue poles, and spatially growing wave functions for decaying states. The PT pairing provides conjugate eigenvalues with conserved probability, avoiding those problems. We agree this creates a distinction from standard resonance modeling and will revise the abstract to clarify that the approach prioritizes eigenvalue structure and probability conservation over temporal decay. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on square-well solution): the leap from the square-well results to the general claim that 'E_BW is not in fact an energy eigenvalue (and thus not a physical particle)' and that Breit-Wigner is therefore invalidated rests on a single exactly solvable model without demonstrated robustness under changes to the potential or comparison to standard resonance calculations in the literature.

    Authors: The square-well potential is selected specifically because it allows exact analytic solutions, making it possible to compute the phase shift explicitly and demonstrate mismatches with the Breit-Wigner form as well as the non-eigenvalue character of E_BW. The underlying issues arise from the analytic continuation of the scattering amplitude and the antilinear PT symmetry of the real-potential Schrödinger equation, features that are not unique to this model. We will add discussion of the generality of these PT-symmetric conjugate pairs and include comparisons to known resonance results in the literature for other potentials. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • The PT-symmetric construction does not reproduce the finite-lifetime exponential decay |ψ(t)|² ∼ e^{-Γ t} required of resonances, as the probability amplitude is time-independent by construction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation from direct SE solution

full rationale

The paper derives its claims by explicitly solving the square-well Schrödinger equation, extracting the scattering phase shift and energy eigenvalues, and invoking the antilinear PT symmetry of the Hamiltonian to obtain conjugate energy pairs. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, renames a known result, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose content is itself unverified. The central assertions follow from the differential-equation solution and the symmetry property without self-referential definitions or statistical forcing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the square well having antilinear PT symmetry that forces conjugate energy pairs, and on the interpretation that this resolves physical inconsistencies in standard resonance scattering.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The square well potential possesses antilinear PT symmetry leading to complex conjugate energy pairs.
    Invoked in the abstract to explain the appearance of E∓=E2∓iΓ2 and time-independent amplitudes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5758 in / 1295 out tokens · 48095 ms · 2026-06-29T11:19:54.118747+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Revisiting Time Evolution and Spatial Distribution of a Resonance

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Analytical continuation of Gamow wavefunctions to real momentum space, with discrete virtual states, yields time evolution from finite-range confined resonance to Breit-Wigner distributed scattering states at large distances.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    we plot the real and imaginary parts off(E) andf BW(E) for our threeV 0 = 4,V 0 = 8 andV 0 = 16 cases, with all real parts vanishing when each relevantβtan(ka) + 1 is zero. Since the scattering amplitude is of the form eiδ sinδit follows that Im[f(E)] =|f(E)| 2, Im[fBW(E)] =|f BW(E)|2 whenδis real, and so we have no need to plot |f(E)| 2 or|f BW(E)|2 sepa...

  2. [2]

    E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. D98, 145 (1955)

    1955

  3. [3]

    P. D. Mannheim,PT symmetry and the square well potential: Antilinear symmetry rather than Hermiticity in scattering processes, arXiv:2505:07798 [quant-ph]

  4. [4]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998)

    1998

  5. [5]

    C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher and P. N. Meisinger, J. Math. Phys.40, 2201 (1999)

    1999

  6. [6]

    Mostafazadeh, J

    A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys.43, 205 (2002); J. Math. Phys.43, 2814 (2002); J. Math. Phys.43, 3944 (2202)

    2002

  7. [7]

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody and H. F. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 270401 (2002)

    2002

  8. [8]

    C. M. Bender, Rep. Prog. Phys.70, 947 (2007)

    2007

  9. [9]

    K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides and Z. H. Musslimani, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 103904 (2008)

    2008

  10. [10]

    C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 110402 (2008)

    2008

  11. [11]

    C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, Phys. Rev. D78, 025022 (2008)

    2008

  12. [12]

    A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Morandotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou and D. N. Christodoulides, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 093902 (2009)

    2009

  13. [13]

    C. M. Bender and P. D. Mannheim, Phys. Lett. A374, 2616 (2010). [13]Special issue on quantum physics with non-Hermitian operators, C. Bender, A. Fring, U. G¨ unther, and H. Jones (Guest Editors) J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45, 444001 - 444036 (2012). [14]Theme issue on PT quantum mechanics, C. M. Bender, M. DeKieviet, and S. P. Klevansky (Guest Editors) Phil....

    2010

  14. [14]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimasni, S. Rotter and D. M. Christodoulides, Nature Phys.14, 1119 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    P. D. Mannheim, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.3, 315302 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    C. M. Bender,PT Symmetry in Quantum And Classical Physics, World Scientific Press, Singapore (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    Fring, F

    A. Fring, F. Correa and C. M. Bender, Proceedings of Virtual seminar series on Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics, Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol.2038(2021)

    2038

  18. [18]

    P. D. Mannheim, Phys. Rev. D112, L031903 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    E. P. Wigner, J. Math. Phys.1, 409 (1960)

    1960

  20. [20]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A180, 1 (1942)

    1942

  21. [21]

    Pauli, Rev

    W. Pauli, Rev. Mod. Phys.15, 175 (1943)

    1943

  22. [22]

    P. D. Mannheim, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D33, 2441016 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    P. D. Mannheim, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A371, 20120060 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick, Nucl. Phys. B9, 209 (1969); Nucl. Phys. B10, 1 (1969); Phys. Rev. D2, 1033 (1970)

    1969

  25. [25]

    In their original approach Dirac and Pauli introduced a unitarity-violating negative Hilbert space metric and a propagator of the form 1/(k 2 −M 2 1 )−1/(k 2 −M 2 2 ) with a relative minus sign, as it would be more convergent at largek 2 than the standard single pole 1/(k 2 −M 2 1 ). To avoid the indefinite metric Lee and Wick introduced the complex conju...

  26. [26]

    Sinclair, D

    J. Sinclair, D. Angulo, K. Thompson, K. Bonsma-Fisher, A. Brodutch and A. M. Steinberg, PRX Quantum3, 010314 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Angulo, K

    D. Angulo, K. Thompson, V-M. Nixon, A. Jiao, H. M. Wiseman and A. M. Steinberg, arXiv:2409.03680 [quant-ph)

    work page arXiv