pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05453 · v1 · pith:RGGXKRETnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · 🌀 gr-qc

Curvature conditions for generalized singularity theorems

Jerem\'ias Da\'in , Gustavo Dotti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 04:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords curvature conditionssingularity theoremstrapped submanifoldsfocal pointsPenrose theoremhigher codimensiongeneral relativitydomain of outer communications
0
0 comments X

The pith

Curvature conditions for focal points fail to hold in general for higher-codimension trapped submanifolds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines whether the curvature conditions introduced in an earlier reference can predict focal points for compact trapped submanifolds of codimension higher than two in spacetimes of arbitrary dimension. The aim is to extend Penrose's singularity theorem beyond the standard two-dimensional trapped surfaces. The authors show that these conditions do not apply in general, though they might hold for particular choices of the submanifolds. As a result, higher-codimension trapped submanifolds could still indicate singularities, but standard arguments cannot exclude the possibility that they intersect the domain of outer communications.

Core claim

The curvature conditions introduced in Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 152002 to predict focal points for trapped spacelike submanifolds do not apply in general but may apply for specific compact trapped submanifolds of higher codimension. Consequently, while higher codimension CTMs may still serve as singularity predictors, the possibility that they intersect the domain of outer communications cannot be ruled out using standard arguments.

What carries the argument

The curvature conditions from Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 152002 that are intended to guarantee focal points along orthogonal geodesics for trapped submanifolds of any codimension.

If this is right

  • Higher-codimension CTMs cannot be ruled out as singularity predictors solely on the basis of the general failure of the conditions.
  • Particular choices of CTMs may still satisfy the curvature requirements and thus serve as predictors.
  • Standard methods leave open the possibility that higher-codimension CTMs intersect the domain of outer communications.
  • Generalizing Penrose's theorem to higher codimensions requires case-by-case verification or new conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Alternative curvature conditions adapted specifically to higher codimensions could be developed to restore the predictive power.
  • Concrete examples of spacetimes with higher-codimension trapped submanifolds should be checked to see when the conditions hold.
  • The domain-of-outer-communications issue may require separate geometric arguments beyond the curvature conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The curvature conditions introduced in Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 152002 are the relevant ones whose applicability must be checked to determine whether focal points can be predicted for higher-codimension trapped submanifolds.

What would settle it

A spacetime containing a higher-codimension compact trapped submanifold that violates the curvature conditions but develops a singularity (or satisfies them without producing one) would settle whether the conditions are necessary for the prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05453 by Gustavo Dotti, Jerem\'ias Da\'in.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The spacetime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the curvature conditions introduced in [Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 152002] to predict focal points for trapped spacelike submanifolds in spacetimes of arbitrary dimensions, with the purpose of generalizing Penrose's singularity theorem to compact trapped submanifolds (CTMs) of codimension higher than two. We find that these conditions do not apply in general but may apply for specific CTMs. As a result, higher codimension CTMs may still work as singularity predictors, although the possibility that they intersect the domain of outer communications cannot be ruled out using standard arguments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the curvature conditions introduced in Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 152002 for predicting focal points along higher-codimension compact trapped submanifolds (CTMs) in spacetimes of arbitrary dimension. The central claim is that these conditions fail to hold for generic higher-codimension CTMs, although they remain viable for certain special cases; consequently, such CTMs may still function as singularity predictors, but standard arguments cannot exclude the possibility that they intersect the domain of outer communications.

Significance. If the applicability analysis holds, the result usefully delimits the scope of existing curvature hypotheses when extending Penrose-type theorems beyond codimension two. It supplies a negative result for the generic case while preserving the logical possibility of special CTMs, thereby clarifying where new curvature conditions or alternative focal-point arguments will be required in higher-dimensional singularity theory.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states the main negative finding clearly, but the manuscript would benefit from a brief explicit example (even schematic) of a specific CTM for which the 2010 curvature conditions are satisfied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The report accurately captures the central claim that the curvature conditions from Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 152002 do not hold generically for higher-codimension compact trapped submanifolds, while remaining applicable in special cases. No major comments were provided, so no revisions are required.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The manuscript recalls curvature conditions from the external 2010 reference Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 152002, applies them to higher-codimension compact trapped submanifolds, and reports that the conditions fail to hold generically while remaining viable only for special cases. This produces a straightforward applicability check whose logical steps (recall external hypotheses, test on new geometric setting, conclude limited scope) contain no self-definitional reductions, no fitted inputs renamed as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations. The central claim is therefore independent of the paper's own inputs and rests on an externally supplied benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, preventing identification of specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The work relies on standard differential geometry and general-relativity background assumptions plus the curvature conditions defined in the cited 2010 reference.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5619 in / 1131 out tokens · 38525 ms · 2026-06-28T04:47:48.789121+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Convex foliations and trapped submanifolds

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Tests in symmetrically collapsing spacetimes and the full sub-extreme Kerr-Newman family support the conjecture that compact trapped submanifolds of codimension >1 stay inside black holes and do not reach the domain o...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Schwarzschild-Tangherlini BH 14

  2. [2]

    energy conditions

    Reissner-Nördstrom BH 14 IV. Conclusions 16 References 17 ∗ gustavo.dotti@unc.edu.ar arXiv:2606.05453v1 [gr-qc] 3 Jun 2026 2 I. INTRODUCTION Energy conditions in3 + 1General Relativity are largely motivated as hypothesis of singularity theorems and obstruction theorems for compact trapped surfaces (CTSs) inter- secting the domain of outer communications (...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    In this case it is trivial to see that (36) is fulfilledat every point of the spacetime, in particular, along the future null normal geodesics of our trappedk−spheres

    Schwarzschild-Tangherlini BH Insertingβ(v, r) = 0andµ(v, r) =µ >0in (31) gives the generalization of the Schwarzschild BH to arbitrary dimensions [8]. In this case it is trivial to see that (36) is fulfilledat every point of the spacetime, in particular, along the future null normal geodesics of our trappedk−spheres. As mentioned above, by Proposition 7, ...

  4. [4]

    As there is no dependence inr, the only negative contribution in (36) vanishes, so the curvature condition is satisfied

    Vaidya Spacetime The Vaidya spacetime of incoming radiation is trivially extended to arbitrary dimensions by replacingβ(v, r) = 0andµ(v, r) =µ(v)>0(withdµ/dv≥0) in (31). As there is no dependence inr, the only negative contribution in (36) vanishes, so the curvature condition is satisfied. The conclusion is same as in the previous example

  5. [5]

    For the sake of simplicity we will fixd= 4, then the metric is (31) with β(v, r) = 0andf(v, r) = 1− 2m r + q2 r2

    Reissner-Nördstrom BH A more intriguing case is the spherically symmetric charged sub-extreme black hole, whose metric depends on two parameters: the massm >0and the electric chargeq̸= 0, subject tom≥ |q|. For the sake of simplicity we will fixd= 4, then the metric is (31) with β(v, r) = 0andf(v, r) = 1− 2m r + q2 r2. The zeroes offare the Cauchy (r−) and...

  6. [6]

    Twilight for the energy conditions?

    C. Barcelo and M. Visser,Twilight for the energy conditions?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D11, 1553- 1560 (2002) doi:10.1142/S0218271802002888 [arXiv:gr-qc/0205066 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271802002888 2002

  7. [7]

    The region with trapped surfaces in spherical symmetry, its core, and their boundaries

    I. Bengtsson y J. M. M. Senovilla,The Region with trapped surfaces in spherical symmetry, its core, and their boundaries, Phys. Rev. D83(2011), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044012. [arXiv: 1009.0225 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.044012 2011

  8. [8]

    Singularity theorems for warped products and the stability of spatial extra dimensions

    N. Cipriani and J. M. M. Senovilla,Singularity theorems for warped products and the stability of spatial extra dimensions, JHEP04, 175 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)175 [arXiv:1901.07271 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2019)175 2019

  9. [9]

    Curiel,A Primer on Energy Conditions, Einstein Stud.13(2017) doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939- 3210-8-3

    E. Curiel,A Primer on Energy Conditions, Einstein Stud.13(2017) doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939- 3210-8-3. [arXiv: 1405.0403 [physics.hist-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4939- 2017

  10. [10]

    Dafermos,Stability and instability of the Reissner-Nordstrom Cauchy horizon and the problem of uniqueness in general relativity, Contemp

    M. Dafermos,Stability and instability of the Reissner-Nordstrom Cauchy horizon and the problem of uniqueness in general relativity, Contemp. Math.350, 99-113 (2004) [arXiv:gr- qc/0209052 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2004

  11. [12]

    Dotti,Obstructions for trapped submanifolds, Class

    G. Dotti,Obstructions for trapped submanifolds, Class. Quant. Grav.42, no.16, 165002 (2025) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adf2f1 [arXiv:2504.01207 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adf2f1 2025

  12. [13]

    Black Holes in Higher Dimensions

    R. Emparan and H. S. Reall,Black Holes in Higher Dimension, Living Rev. Rel.11(2008), doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-6 [arXiv:0801.3471 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2008-6 2008

  13. [14]

    G. J. Galloway and J. M. M. Senovilla,Singularity theorems based on trapped submani- folds of arbitrary co-dimension, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 152002 (2010) doi:10.1088/0264- 18 9381/27/15/152002 [arXiv:1005.1249 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264- 2010

  14. [15]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The Large Scale Structure Of Space-time, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1973, isbn: 0-521-09906-4

    1973

  15. [16]

    Minguzzi,A gravitational collapse singularity theorem consistent with black hole evaporation, Lett

    E. Minguzzi,A gravitational collapse singularity theorem consistent with black hole evaporation, Lett. Math. Phys.110, (2020) 2383–2396. doi: 10.1007/s11005-020-01295-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11005-020-01295-9 2020

  16. [17]

    O’Niell,Semi-Riemannian Geometry, Academic Press, 1983, isbn: 0-12-526740-1

    B. O’Niell,Semi-Riemannian Geometry, Academic Press, 1983, isbn: 0-12-526740-1

    1983

  17. [18]

    Poisson and W

    E. Poisson and W. Israel,Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1663-1666 (1989) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1663

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.63.1663 1989

  18. [19]

    Simpson and R

    M. Simpson and R. Penrose,Internal instability in a Reissner-Nordström black hole, Int. J. Theor. Phys.7(1973), 183–197, doi:10.1007/BF00792069

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00792069 1973

  19. [20]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity, Chicago Univ. Pr., 1984, isbn: 0-226-87033-2

    1984