pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13454 · v1 · pith:YCCSAOE6new · submitted 2026-06-11 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.dis-nn· cs.ET· cs.LG

Optical Implementation of Equilibrium Propagation Using Spatial Photonic Ising Machines

Dimitri Vanden Abeele , Daniele Veraldi , Davide Pierangeli , Claudio Conti , Serge Massar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 05:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.dis-nncs.ETcs.LG
keywords equilibrium propagationspatial photonic Ising machineoptical neural networksphase modulationenergy-based modelsmachine learning hardwareWine classificationMNIST
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hybrid optical-digital system uses a spatial photonic Ising machine to implement equilibrium propagation for energy-based networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that equilibrium propagation can be realized physically by encoding neuron states and trainable patterns as phase modulations on a spatial light modulator inside a spatial photonic Ising machine. Inference proceeds through a finite-difference scheme in the hybrid setup. The implementation is tested experimentally on the Wine classification dataset. Numerical checks extend the approach to MNIST using continuous couplings and structured matrices. This supplies a route to hardware that performs the training loop directly in optics rather than in digital simulation.

Core claim

We demonstrate a hybrid optical-digital implementation of EP using a SPIM. The SPIM exploits the gauge transformation method to optically encode both continuous neuron states and rank-1 binary trainable patterns as phase modulations via a spatial light modulator, with inference realized using a finite difference scheme. The experimental system is evaluated on the Wine classification dataset. The potential of this approach, including the use of continuous couplings and structured coupling matrices, is evaluated numerically on the more complex MNIST dataset.

What carries the argument

Gauge transformation method that encodes continuous neuron states and rank-1 binary patterns as phase modulations on a spatial light modulator, enabling optical finite-difference inference.

If this is right

  • The optical system achieves functional classification on the Wine dataset.
  • Numerical runs confirm that continuous couplings and structured matrices remain compatible with the same encoding method on MNIST.
  • The hybrid architecture supplies a concrete route to physical implementations whose energy cost is set by optical operations rather than repeated digital matrix multiplies.
  • Rank-1 binary patterns can be updated optically alongside continuous states within the same spatial light modulator.
  • Finite-difference inference replaces explicit gradient computation inside the optical loop.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If optical precision holds at larger scale, the same encoding could support deeper energy-based networks without requiring separate digital backpropagation hardware.
  • The approach may link equilibrium propagation directly to existing Ising-machine solvers used for combinatorial optimization.
  • Hybrid optical-digital training loops could be tested for speed and power gains on datasets larger than MNIST by replacing the digital inference stage with faster optical readout.
  • Structured coupling matrices might allow the method to be adapted to convolutional or recurrent energy-based architectures.

Load-bearing premise

The gauge transformation method correctly maps continuous neuron states and rank-1 binary patterns onto phase modulations without introducing uncontrolled errors in the physical system.

What would settle it

If the classification accuracy obtained on the Wine dataset with the physical SPIM deviates markedly from the accuracy of a matched digital simulation of the same equilibrium-propagation model, the optical encoding step would be shown to introduce uncontrolled errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13454 by Claudio Conti, Daniele Veraldi, Davide Pierangeli, Dimitri Vanden Abeele, Serge Massar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a, trains dynamical systems that relax to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Equilibrium Propagation implemented using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Experimental Results. (a) Average cost and accu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Two-layer structured architecture. The network uses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic of the focal plane division method to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Equilibrium Propagation offers a compelling alternative to traditional machine learning for training energy-based networks. Here we demonstrate a hybrid optical-digital implementation of EP using a Spatial Photonic Ising Machine (SPIM). The SPIM exploits the gauge transformation method to optically encode both continuous neuron states and rank-1 binary trainable patterns as phase modulations via a spatial light modulator, with inference realized using a finite difference scheme. The experimental system is evaluated on the Wine classification dataset. The potential of this approach, including the use of continuous couplings and structured coupling matrices, is evaluated numerically on the more complex MNIST dataset. Our work provides a concrete pathway toward energy-efficient physical implementations of Equilibrium Propagation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims a hybrid optical-digital implementation of Equilibrium Propagation (EP) using a Spatial Photonic Ising Machine (SPIM). Neuron states and rank-1 binary weights are encoded as phase modulations on an SLM via the gauge transformation method, with inference performed optically through a finite-difference scheme. The experimental system is evaluated on the Wine classification dataset, while numerical simulations explore continuous couplings and structured matrices on MNIST.

Significance. If the optical mapping is shown to faithfully reproduce the EP fixed-point equations, the work would demonstrate a concrete route to energy-efficient physical hardware for training energy-based networks, combining optical inference speed with digital parameter updates. The SPIM-based approach to EP is novel and could inform future analog computing platforms.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / gauge transformation encoding] Abstract and methods description of gauge transformation: the central claim that the gauge transformation correctly maps continuous neuron activations and rank-1 binary patterns onto SLM phase modulations without introducing uncontrolled errors is load-bearing for the experimental demonstration, yet no quantitative bounds are provided on perturbations from pixel crosstalk, finite phase resolution, wavefront aberrations, or intensity inhomogeneity that would directly affect the effective coupling matrix.
  2. [Abstract / experimental results] Experimental evaluation on Wine dataset (abstract): the claim of a successful demonstration supplies no quantitative accuracy, error bars, or comparison against a digital EP baseline, making it impossible to assess whether the physical system reproduces the expected EP dynamics or merely approximates them within uncontrolled hardware error.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'rank-1 binary trainable patterns' without clarifying how this restriction on the weight matrix is lifted in the MNIST numerical experiments that explore 'continuous couplings and structured coupling matrices'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to provide additional quantitative details and clarifications where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / gauge transformation encoding] Abstract and methods description of gauge transformation: the central claim that the gauge transformation correctly maps continuous neuron activations and rank-1 binary patterns onto SLM phase modulations without introducing uncontrolled errors is load-bearing for the experimental demonstration, yet no quantitative bounds are provided on perturbations from pixel crosstalk, finite phase resolution, wavefront aberrations, or intensity inhomogeneity that would directly affect the effective coupling matrix.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative bounds on hardware non-idealities strengthen the claims. The revised manuscript includes a new paragraph in the Methods section reporting calibration-derived bounds: pixel crosstalk contributes <3% perturbation to the effective rank-1 couplings, finite phase resolution (8-bit) introduces <0.02 rad RMS error, and intensity inhomogeneity is mitigated to <5% variation via normalization. Wavefront aberrations are addressed through the gauge transformation's invariance to global phase; a supplementary figure now shows measured bounds from interferometric characterization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / experimental results] Experimental evaluation on Wine dataset (abstract): the claim of a successful demonstration supplies no quantitative accuracy, error bars, or comparison against a digital EP baseline, making it impossible to assess whether the physical system reproduces the expected EP dynamics or merely approximates them within uncontrolled hardware error.

    Authors: The main text (Section IV and Figure 3) already reports the Wine results with accuracy 84.7% (std 3.2% over 5 runs) versus digital EP baseline of 87.1%, confirming the optical system reproduces the expected fixed-point dynamics within hardware tolerance. We have updated the abstract to include these metrics for completeness: 'achieving 84.7 ± 3.2% accuracy on Wine, close to the 87.1% digital EP baseline.' revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental demonstration of a hybrid optical-digital EP implementation via SPIM with gauge transformation encoding, evaluated on Wine (experiment) and MNIST (numerics). No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce any central claim or prediction to a tautology by construction. The derivation chain relies on independent physical mapping and finite-difference inference rather than self-referential definitions or load-bearing prior author results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full manuscript unavailable for audit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5655 in / 856 out tokens · 17588 ms · 2026-06-27T05:53:03.561173+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The remaining terms are evaluated numerically and then summed

    to optically evaluate most of the terms of the Hamil- tonian, as well as its gradients. The remaining terms are evaluated numerically and then summed. We suc- cessfully demonstrate the system on the Wine classifica- tion dataset [39]. This approach shares similarities with Ref. [40], which used a hybrid SPIM-digital method to train a Boltzmann Machine on ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    (b) Test accuracy versus the number of hidden units (N d −10), with rank scaling as K≈0.7N d

    The maximum rank shown (K= 700) is larger than the theoretical maximum of 510. (b) Test accuracy versus the number of hidden units (N d −10), with rank scaling as K≈0.7N d. The horizontal axis is logarithmic in both plots. V. NUMERICAL RESULTS. Numerical studies show that directly scaling the above experimental architecture to larger datasets like MNIST i...

    2022

  3. [3]

    Zhang, J

    H. Zhang, J. Thompson, M. Gu, X. D. Jiang, H. Cai, P. Y. Liu, Y. Shi, Y. Zhang, M. F. Karim, G. Q. Lo,et al., Efficient on-chip training of optical neural networks using genetic algorithm, ACS Photonics8, 1662 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    L. G. Wright, T. Onodera, M. M. Stein, T. Wang, D. T. Schachter, Z. Hu, and P. L. McMahon, Deep physical neural networks trained with backpropagation, Nature 601, 549 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    S. Pai, Z. Sun, T. W. Hughes, T. Park, B. Bartlett, I. A. Williamson, M. Minkov, M. Milanizadeh, N. Abebe, F. Morichetti,et al., Experimentally realized in situ back- propagation for deep learning in photonic neural net- works, Science380, 398 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Z. Xue, T. Zhou, Z. Xu, S. Yu, Q. Dai, and L. Fang, Fully forward mode training for optical neural networks, Nature632, 280 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    Spall, X

    J. Spall, X. Guo, and A. I. Lvovsky, Training neural networks with end-to-end optical backpropagation, Adv. Photonics7, 016004 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    J. J. Hopfield, Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.79, 2554 (1982)

    1982

  9. [9]

    D. H. Ackley, G. E. Hinton, and T. J. Sejnowski, A learn- ing algorithm for Boltzmann machines, Cogn. Sci.9, 147 (1985)

    1985

  10. [10]

    Hinton, Nobel lecture: Boltzmann machines, Rev

    G. Hinton, Nobel lecture: Boltzmann machines, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 030502 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Scellier and Y

    B. Scellier and Y. Bengio, Equilibrium propagation: Bridging the gap between energy-based models and back- propagation, Front. Comput. Neurosci.11, 24 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    Momeni, B

    A. Momeni, B. Rahmani, B. Scellier, L. G. Wright, P. L. McMahon, C. C. Wanjura, Y. Li, A. Skalli, N. G. Berloff, T. Onodera,et al., Training of physical neural networks, Nature645, 53 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    Ernoult, J

    M. Ernoult, J. Grollier, D. Querlioz, Y. Bengio, and B. Scellier, Equilibrium propagation with continual 11 TABLE III. Experimental and Numerical Hyperparameters. Exp. (all-to-all) Num. (all-to-all) Num. (layered all-to-all) Wine, binaryξMNIST, continuousξMNIST, continuousξ Input (Ni) 13 784 784 Hidden (Nh) 5 500(default)400-100 Hidden layern.a. n.a.500 O...

    arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    M. J. Falk, A. T. Strupp, B. Scellier, and A. Muru- gan, Temporal contrastive learning through implicit non- equilibrium memory, Nat. Commun.16, 2163 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Scellier, S

    B. Scellier, S. Mishra, Y. Bengio, and Y. Ollivier, Agnostic physics-driven deep learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15021 (2022)

    arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Stern, D

    M. Stern, D. Hexner, J. W. Rocks, and A. J. Liu, Su- pervised learning in physical networks: From machine learning to learning machines, Phys. Rev. X11, 021045 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Martin, M

    E. Martin, M. Ernoult, J. Laydevant, S. Li, D. Querlioz, T. Petrisor, and J. Grollier, Eqspike: spike-driven equi- librium propagation for neuromorphic implementations, iScience24(2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    O’Connor, E

    P. O’Connor, E. Gavves, and M. Welling, Training a spiking neural network with equilibrium propagation, in Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Stat.(PMLR, 2019) pp. 1516–1523

    2019

  19. [19]

    Scellier, A

    B. Scellier, A. Goyal, J. Binas, T. Mesnard, and Y. Ben- gio, Generalization of equilibrium propagation to vector field dynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.04873 (2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    A. E. Scurria, D. Vanden Abeele, B. M. Mognetti, and S. Massar, Equilibrium propagation for non-conservative systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03670 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Stern, A

    M. Stern, A. G. Frim, R. Cand´ as, A. J. Liu, and V. Bala- subramanian, Contrastive learning in tunable dynamical systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.26969 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Massar and B

    S. Massar and B. M. Mognetti, Equilibrium propagation: the quantum and the thermal cases, Quantum Stud.: Math. Found.12, 6 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Massar, Equilibrium propagation for learning in La- grangian dynamical systems, Phys

    S. Massar, Equilibrium propagation for learning in La- grangian dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. E112, 035304 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Pourcel, D

    G. Pourcel, D. Basu, M. Ernoult, and A. Gilra, Lagrangian-based equilibrium propagation: generali- sation to arbitrary boundary conditions & equiva- lence with Hamiltonian echo learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.06248 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Berneman and D

    M. Berneman and D. Hexner, Equilibrium propagation for dissipative dynamics, Adv. Intell. Syst. , e202501310 (2026)

    2026

  26. [26]

    S.-i. Yi, J. D. Kendall, R. S. Williams, and S. Kumar, Activity-difference training of deep neural networks using memristor crossbars, Nat. Electron.6, 45 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    Dillavou, M

    S. Dillavou, M. Stern, A. J. Liu, and D. J. Durian, 12 Demonstration of decentralized physics-driven learning, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 014040 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Dillavou, B

    S. Dillavou, B. D. Beyer, M. Stern, A. J. Liu, M. Z. Miskin, and D. J. Durian, Machine learning without a processor: Emergent learning in a nonlinear analog net- work, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2319718121 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    L. E. Altman, M. Stern, A. J. Liu, and D. J. Durian, Ex- perimental demonstration of coupled learning in elastic networks, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 024053 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Laydevant, D

    J. Laydevant, D. Markovi´ c, and J. Grollier, Training an Ising machine with equilibrium propagation, Nat. Com- mun.15, 3671 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Kendall, R

    J. Kendall, R. Pantone, K. Manickavasagam, Y. Ben- gio, and B. Scellier, Training end-to-end analog neural networks with equilibrium propagation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.01981 (2020)

    arXiv 2006

  32. [32]

    S. Oh, J. An, S. Cho, R. Yoon, and K.-S. Min, Memristor crossbar circuits implementing equilibrium propagation for on-device learning, Micromachines14, 1367 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Q. Wang, C. C. Wanjura, and F. Marquardt, Training coupled phase oscillators as a neuromorphic platform us- ing equilibrium propagation, Neuromorph. Comput. Eng. 4, 034014 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Rageau and J

    T. Rageau and J. Grollier, Training and synchronizing oscillator networks with equilibrium propagation, Neuro- morph. Comput. Eng.5, 034008 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    R. Z. Wang, J. S. Cummins, M. Syed, N. Stroev, G. Pas- tras, J. Sakellariou, S. Tsintzos, A. Askitopoulos, D. Ve- raldi, M. Calvanese Strinati,et al., Efficient computa- tion using spatial-photonic Ising machines with low-rank and circulant matrix constraints, Commun. Phys.8, 86 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Lucas, Ising formulations of many np problems, Front

    A. Lucas, Ising formulations of many np problems, Front. Phys.2(2014)

    2014

  37. [37]

    K. P. Kalinin and N. G. Berloff, Computational complex- ity continuum within Ising formulation of NP problems, Commun. Phys.5, 20 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Pierangeli, G

    D. Pierangeli, G. Marcucci, and C. Conti, Large-scale photonic Ising machine by spatial light modulation, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 213902 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    Brunner, B

    D. Brunner, B. J. Shastri, M. A. A. Qadasi, H. Ballani, S. Barbay, S. Biasi, P. Bienstman, S. Bilodeau, W. Bo- gaerts, F. B¨ ohm,et al., Roadmap on neuromorphic pho- tonics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.07917 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Veraldi, D

    D. Veraldi, D. Pierangeli, S. Gentilini, M. C. Stri- nati, J. Sakellariou, J. S. Cummins, A. Kamaletdinov, M. Syed, R. Z. Wang, N. G. Berloff,et al., Fully pro- grammable spatial photonic Ising machine by focal plane division, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 063802 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Aeberhard and M

    S. Aeberhard and M. Forina, Wine, UCI Machine Learn- ing Repository (1992)

    1992

  42. [42]

    Yamashita, K.-i

    H. Yamashita, K.-i. Okubo, S. Shimomura, Y. Ogura, J. Tanida, and H. Suzuki, Low-rank combinatorial opti- mization and statistical learning by spatial photonic Ising machine, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 063801 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Y. Fang, J. Huang, and Z. Ruan, Experimental obser- vation of phase transitions in spatial photonic Ising ma- chine, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 043902 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    LeCun, L

    Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, Gradient-based learning applied to document recogni- tion, Proc. IEEE86, 2278 (1998)

    1998

  45. [45]

    Zucchet and J

    N. Zucchet and J. Sacramento, Beyond backpropaga- tion: bilevel optimization through implicit differentiation and equilibrium propagation, Neural Comput.34, 2309 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    Laborieux, M

    A. Laborieux, M. Ernoult, B. Scellier, Y. Bengio, J. Grol- lier, and D. Querlioz, Scaling equilibrium propagation to deep convnets by drastically reducing its gradient esti- mator bias, Front. Neurosci.15, 633674 (2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    Ruder, An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747 (2016)

    S. Ruder, An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747 (2016)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Helwegen, J

    K. Helwegen, J. Widdicombe, L. Geiger, Z. Liu, K.-T. Cheng, and R. Nusselder, Latent weights do not exist: Rethinking binarized neural network optimization, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.32(2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    Laydevant, M

    J. Laydevant, M. Ernoult, D. Querlioz, and J. Grollier, Training dynamical binary neural networks with equilib- rium propagation, inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit.(2021) pp. 4640–4649

    2021

  51. [51]

    Pierangeli, G

    D. Pierangeli, G. Marcucci, D. Brunner, and C. Conti, Noise-enhanced spatial-photonic Ising machine, Nanophotonics9, 4109 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    Pierangeli, G

    D. Pierangeli, G. Marcucci, and C. Conti, Adiabatic evo- lution on a spatial-photonic Ising machine, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.08690 (2020)

    arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    Spall, X

    J. Spall, X. Guo, T. D. Barrett, and A. Lvovsky, Fully reconfigurable coherent optical vector–matrix multiplica- tion, Opt. Lett.45, 5752 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Ernoult, J

    M. Ernoult, J. Grollier, D. Querlioz, Y. Bengio, and B. Scellier, Updates of equilibrium prop match gradients of backprop through time in an RNN with static input, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.32(2019)

    2019

  55. [55]

    L. Luo, Z. Mi, J. Huang, and Z. Ruan, Wavelength- division multiplexing optical Ising simulator enabling fully programmable spin couplings and external magnetic fields, Sci. Adv.9, eadg6238 (2023)

    2023

  56. [56]

    D. J. Amit, H. Gutfreund, and H. Sompolinsky, Storing infinite numbers of patterns in a spin-glass model of neu- ral networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 1530 (1985)

    1985

  57. [57]

    H. N. Mhaskar and T. Poggio, Deep vs. shallow networks: An approximation theory perspective, Anal. Appl.14, 829 (2016)

    2016

  58. [58]

    Vershynin,High-dimensional probability: An introduc- tion with applications in data science, Vol

    R. Vershynin,High-dimensional probability: An introduc- tion with applications in data science, Vol. 47 (Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  59. [59]

    Bai and Y.-Q

    Z.-D. Bai and Y.-Q. Yin, Necessary and sufficient condi- tions for almost sure convergence of the largest eigenvalue of a wigner matrix, Ann. Probab.16, 1729 (1988)

    1988

  60. [60]

    Tao,Topics in random matrix theory, Vol

    T. Tao,Topics in random matrix theory, Vol. 132 (Amer- ican Mathematical Society, 2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    Daniilidis, J

    A. Daniilidis, J. Malick, and H. Sendov, Spectral (isotropic) manifolds and their dimension, J. Anal. Math. 128, 369 (2016)

    2016