Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

A non-Hermitian two-qubit XY model with staggered imaginary field realizes an idle-level quantum Otto engine in which tuning the non-Hermitian parameter drives a transition to heat-engine operation and raises efficiency.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-29 05:20 UTC pith:PXMXIDDO

load-bearing objection The paper gives a spin-system realization of the idle-level engine but the field independence of the idle levels needs explicit eigenvalue verification to support the claimed mechanism. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.22405 v2 pith:PXMXIDDO submitted 2026-06-21 quant-ph

Quantum Otto engine with field-decoupled idle levels in a non-Hermitian XY model

Maimaitiyiming Tusun , Fang Zhao This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantum Otto enginenon-Hermitian XY modelidle levelsPT symmetryquantum heat enginetwo-qubit systemtrapped ions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the energy spectrum of this non-Hermitian XY system splits naturally into a pair of working levels that shift with the external field and a pair of idle levels that remain fixed. Tuning the non-Hermitian strength η0 compresses the idle gap, which redistributes the thermal occupation weights between the hot and cold reservoirs and thereby controls the absorbed heat. This produces a continuous change from a regime of negative net work to one of positive net work and positive heat absorption from the hot bath, with efficiency rising to a substantial fraction of the Carnot limit. The net-work formula has an η0-independent numerator whose denominators vary through hyperbolic-cosine functions of the idle gap, supplying the explicit control mechanism. The results hold under parameter variations and include a concrete proposal for trapped-ion implementation.

Core claim

The non-Hermitian two-qubit XY model with staggered imaginary magnetic field constitutes the first microscopic spin realization of an idle-level quantum heat engine. Its spectrum decomposes into field-dependent working levels and field-independent idle levels; increasing the non-Hermitian parameter η0 within the unbroken PT-symmetric phase compresses the idle gap, redistributes level occupations, and thereby converts the cycle from dissipative to genuine heat-engine operation while increasing both output work and efficiency to a sizable fraction of the Carnot bound. The net-work expression possesses an η0-independent numerator and η0-dependent denominators mediated by hyperbolic cosines.

What carries the argument

The natural decomposition of the energy spectrum into external-field-dependent working levels and entirely field-independent idle levels, with the idle gap tuned by the non-Hermitian parameter η0.

Load-bearing premise

The energy spectrum of the system naturally decomposes into working levels that depend on the external field and idle levels that are entirely independent of it.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of net work versus η0 that checks whether the numerator stays constant while the denominators vary through hyperbolic cosines and efficiency rises toward the Carnot limit inside the PT-symmetric phase.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Tuning η0 within the unbroken PT-symmetric phase produces a continuous transition from negative net work to positive net work and positive heat absorption from the hot reservoir.
  • Engine efficiency increases considerably and reaches a substantial fraction of the Carnot limit as η0 grows.
  • The net-work expression has an η0-independent numerator whose denominators depend on η0 through hyperbolic-cosine functions of the idle gap.
  • The performance enhancement remains robust under variations of the remaining model parameters.
  • The same control mechanism can be realized in a trapped-ion quantum simulator.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous idle-level decoupling might appear in other qubit or spin-chain Hamiltonians if their spectra can be arranged to separate field dependence in the same way.
  • The occupation-weight redistribution could be verified experimentally by measuring steady-state populations in the hot and cold thermal states while scanning η0.
  • Non-Hermitian control of idle gaps may extend to other thermodynamic cycles such as Carnot or Stirling engines realized in similar spin models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates a quantum Otto cycle using a non-Hermitian two-qubit XY model with a staggered imaginary magnetic field. It claims that the energy spectrum naturally separates into a pair of external-field-dependent working levels and a pair of field-independent idle levels, providing the first microscopic spin realization of the idle-level quantum heat engine proposed by de Oliveira and Jonathan. Tuning the non-Hermitian parameter η₀ induces a continuous transition from a dissipative regime (negative net work) to genuine heat-engine operation, with both output work and efficiency enhanced; efficiency reaches a substantial fraction of the Carnot limit within the PT-symmetric phase. The enhancement is attributed to compression of the idle-level gap, which redistributes thermal occupations, while the net-work expression has an η₀-independent numerator whose denominators depend on η₀ via hyperbolic cosines. The work includes robustness checks, comparison to the Hermitian limit, and a trapped-ion experimental proposal.

Significance. If the claimed spectrum decomposition and the resulting performance gains are confirmed, the result supplies a concrete physical platform for the abstract idle-level engine concept and illustrates how non-Hermiticity can be used to control both operating mode and efficiency in a quantum heat engine. The explicit experimental proposal for trapped ions and the parameter-robustness analysis are concrete strengths that increase the work’s potential impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and spectrum analysis section] The central claim that the model realizes the idle-level engine rests on the spectrum decomposing into working levels that depend on the external field h and idle levels that are completely independent of h. The abstract asserts this separation occurs naturally, yet the non-Hermitian term could in principle mix all levels. Explicit eigenvalue expressions (or a clear derivation showing ∂E_idle/∂h = 0) must be provided to confirm that the idle gap is field-independent while the working gap remains tunable; without this, the mechanism that keeps the net-work numerator η₀-independent cannot be verified.
  2. [Net-work expression and efficiency analysis] The abstract states that the net-work numerator is η₀-independent while the denominators depend on η₀ through hyperbolic cosines, and that performance gains arise from idle-gap compression. It is necessary to show the explicit net-work formula (presumably derived from the four-level occupations) and demonstrate that the observed enhancement is not an artifact of the fitting procedure or of the particular choice of η₀ range; otherwise the claim that non-Hermiticity provides genuine control remains unproven.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions “a substantial fraction of the Carnot limit” without quoting the numerical value or the corresponding η₀; adding the concrete number would improve clarity.
  2. [Abstract] The experimental proposal for trapped ions is mentioned but not detailed in the abstract; a one-sentence outline of the required operations would help readers assess feasibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment of significance, and constructive major comments. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested explicit derivations and formulas.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and spectrum analysis section] The central claim that the model realizes the idle-level engine rests on the spectrum decomposing into working levels that depend on the external field h and idle levels that are completely independent of h. The abstract asserts this separation occurs naturally, yet the non-Hermitian term could in principle mix all levels. Explicit eigenvalue expressions (or a clear derivation showing ∂E_idle/∂h = 0) must be provided to confirm that the idle gap is field-independent while the working gap remains tunable; without this, the mechanism that keeps the net-work numerator η₀-independent cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit eigenvalue expressions and the derivative condition are necessary to rigorously establish the decomposition. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection in the spectrum analysis that solves the characteristic equation of the 4×4 non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. The resulting eigenvalues factor into two h-dependent working levels and two completely h-independent idle levels, directly demonstrating ∂E_idle/∂h = 0. This derivation also shows why the numerator of the net-work expression remains independent of η₀. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Net-work expression and efficiency analysis] The abstract states that the net-work numerator is η₀-independent while the denominators depend on η₀ through hyperbolic cosines, and that performance gains arise from idle-gap compression. It is necessary to show the explicit net-work formula (presumably derived from the four-level occupations) and demonstrate that the observed enhancement is not an artifact of the fitting procedure or of the particular choice of η₀ range; otherwise the claim that non-Hermiticity provides genuine control remains unproven.

    Authors: We will add the explicit net-work formula W_net = (numerator independent of η₀) / (denominators involving cosh(η₀)) together with the four-level thermal occupation expressions from which it is obtained. To rule out artifacts we will include additional panels showing W_net and efficiency versus η₀ over an extended interval (including the Hermitian limit η₀ = 0) and will compare the analytic curves with direct numerical evaluation of the cycle, confirming that the enhancement tracks the idle-gap compression rather than any fitting choice. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; spectrum decomposition and work expression are explicit derivations from the Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper defines a concrete non-Hermitian XY Hamiltonian, computes its eigenvalues explicitly, and shows that two levels depend on the external field h while two do not. The net-work formula is then written in terms of those eigenvalues and thermal factors; the η0-independence of the numerator follows directly from the idle-level energies being independent of h (a structural feature of the 4×4 matrix, not a fit). No step equates a derived quantity to its own input by construction, no self-citation is load-bearing, and no ansatz is smuggled. The derivation chain is self-contained against the stated Hamiltonian and the external reference to de Oliveira & Jonathan.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; ledger entries are therefore minimal and provisional.

free parameters (1)
  • η0
    Non-Hermitian parameter whose value controls the transition and efficiency; no fitted numerical value given in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Energy spectrum naturally decomposes into field-dependent working levels and field-independent idle levels.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the basis for the idle-level engine realization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5844 in / 1235 out tokens · 28119 ms · 2026-06-29T05:20:19.337430+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigated a quantum Otto cycle in a non-Hermitian two-qubit XY model with a staggered imaginary magnetic field. The energy spectrum of this system naturally decomposes into a pair of working levels that depend on the external field and a pair of idle levels that are entirely independent of it. Accordingly, the model represents the first concrete microscopic realization of the idle-level quantum heat engine proposed by de Oliveira and Jonathan [Phys. Rev. E \textbf{104}, 044133 (2021)] in a physical spin framework. According to our findings, tuning the non-Hermitian parameter $\eta_0$ drove a continuous transition from a dissipative regime, characterized by negative net work and net heat absorption from the hot reservoir, to genuine heat-engine operation while enhancing both output work and efficiency. Specifically, as $\eta_0$ increased within the stable phase with unbroken parity--time symmetry, the engine efficiency increased considerably and reached a substantial fraction of the Carnot limit. This joint performance enhancement originated from the compression of the idle-level gap, which redistributed the level-occupation weights in the hot and cold equilibrium states and thereby modulated the absorbed heat. Mathematically, the net-work expression had an $\eta_0$-independent numerator, but its denominators depended indirectly on $\eta_0$ through hyperbolic cosine functions, providing the basis for the idle-level control mechanism. We further thoroughly analyzed the robustness of these findings against parameter variations, critically compared non-Hermitian control with the Hermitian limit, and developed a concrete experimental proposal for trapped-ion quantum simulators. Together, our results demonstrate that non-Hermiticity serves as an indispensable tool for controlling both the operating mode and performance of a quantum engine.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22405 by Fang Zhao, Maimaitiyiming Tusun.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Net work [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Engine efficiency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Net work [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Idle-level occupation difference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Hermitian entropy production from fluctuation theorems

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Post-selected fluctuation theorems yield a nonnegative entropy production Σ=⟨ΔS⟩+Ξ for non-Hermitian evolution, equal to a Petz–Rényi gap and sensitive to exceptional points via its coherent part.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (1) and (3) are mathema tically equivalent

    (3) Notably, because σ α 1 σ α 2 = σ α 2 σ α 1 for Pauli matrices, the Hamiltonians in Eqs. (1) and (3) are mathema tically equivalent. In the computational basis {|↑↑⟩, |↑↓⟩, |↓↑⟩, |↓↓⟩}, H assumes the following block-diagonal representation: H =    − 2J h0 0 0 − 2J γ 0 − 2iJ η0 − 2J 0 0 − 2J 2iJ η0 0 − 2J γ 0 0 2 J h0    . (4) This structure decom...

  2. [2]

    A description of the complete diagonalization, including the construction of the biorthogonal eigenbasis, is provided in App endix A

    (6) The idle-level eigenvalues are completely independent of h0. A description of the complete diagonalization, including the construction of the biorthogonal eigenbasis, is provided in App endix A. When |η0| < 1, the Hamiltonian has PT symmetry, admits a complete set of biortho gonal eigenvectors, and has purely real eigenvalues[ 30]. Notably, all calcul...

  3. [3]

    Tianchi T alents

    (8) The eigenvalues can then be expressed as ∓ A, ∓ B. Accordingly, the partition function reduces to Z = 2 cosh(βA ) + 2 cosh(βB ), and the equilibrium internal energy has the following analytical for m: U (h, T ) = − A sinh(βA ) + B sinh(βB ) cosh(βA ) + cosh(βB ) . (9) The detailed derivation and verification of this expression are provid ed in Appendix...

  4. [4]

    (A8) It yields the following eigenvalues: E3 = − 2J √ 1 − η2 0, E 4 = +2J √ 1 − η2

    = 0 . (A8) It yields the following eigenvalues: E3 = − 2J √ 1 − η2 0, E 4 = +2J √ 1 − η2

  5. [5]

    (A9) Following the approach of Li et al.[ 33], we define the following parameters: d3 = iη0 + √ 1 − η2 0, d 4 = iη0 − √ 1 − η2

  6. [6]

    (A12) To construct a biorthogonal basis for the non-Hermitian idle-level subspace, the left eigenvectors must be obtained (eigenvectors of H †)

    (A10) Accordingly, the unnormalized right eigenvectors become |Ψ R 3 ⟩ = 1 √ 1 + |d3|2 (d3| ↑↓⟩+ | ↓↑⟩) , (A11) |Ψ R 4 ⟩ = 1 √ 1 + |d4|2 (d4| ↑↓⟩+ | ↓↑⟩) . (A12) To construct a biorthogonal basis for the non-Hermitian idle-level subspace, the left eigenvectors must be obtained (eigenvectors of H †). These left eigenvectors satisfy ⟨Ψ L k |H = Ek⟨Ψ L k |, ...

  7. [7]

    (A15) Biorthogonal normalization The biorthonormality condition is ⟨Ψ L i |Ψ R j ⟩ = δij. The corresponding diagonal normalization constants ci = ⟨Ψ L i |Ψ R i ⟩ are c3 = 1 + d3d∗ 5 = 2 √ 1 − η2 0 ( √ 1 − η2 0 + iη0 ) , (A16) c4 = 1 + d4d∗ 6 = 2 √ 1 − η2 0 ( √ 1 − η2 0 − iη0 ) . (A17) Following the approach of Li et al.[ 33], we leave the left eigenvector...

  8. [8]

    95, the gap is 2 B = 4 J √ 1 − 0

    (B2) For η0 = 0 . 95, the gap is 2 B = 4 J √ 1 − 0. 952 ≈ 4J × 0. 312 ≈ 1. 25J, which remains sizable. Given a typical cycle time τ ≫ 1/J , A34 ≪ 1 is easily satisfied. By comparison, for η0 = 0 . 99, the gap decreases to ≈ 0. 56J, increasing A34 by a factor of approximately five and making adiabaticity more difficult to maintain. Accordingly, the condition η...

    2081

  9. [9]

    Gemmer, M

    J. Gemmer, M. Michel, and G. Mahler, Quantum Thermodynamics: Emergence of Thermodynamic Behav ior Within Composite Quantum Systems , Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 784 (Springer, Berlin, 2009)

    2009

  10. [10]

    Vinjanampathy and J

    S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders, Quantum thermodynamics , Contemp. Phys. 57, 545 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    Goold, M

    J. Goold, M. Huber, A. Riera, L. del Rio, and P. Skrzypczyk , The role of quantum information in thermodynamics—A topical review, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 143001 (2016)

    2016

  12. [12]

    Binder, L

    F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Ades so (eds.), Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Funda- mental Aspects and New Directions , Fundamental Theories of Physics Vol. 195 (Springer, Cham, 2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    O. Abah, J. Roßnagel, G. Jacob, S. Deffner, F. Schmidt-Kal er, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Single-Ion Heat Engine at Maximum Power, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203006 (2012)

    2012

  14. [14]

    Roßnagel, S

    J. Roßnagel, S. T. Dawkins, K. N. Tolazzi, O. Abah, E. Lutz , F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, A single-atom heat engine , Science 344, 1250091 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Klatzow, J

    J. Klatzow, J. N. Becker, P. M. Ledingham, C. Weinzettl, K . T. Kaczmarek, D. J. Saunders, J. Nunn, I. A. Walmsley, R. Uzdin, and E. Poem, Experimental Demonstration of Quantu m Effects in the Operation of Microscopic Heat Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 110601 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    J. P. S. Peterson, T. B. Batalh˜ ao, M. Herrera, A. M. Souza , R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, and R. M. Serra, Experimenta l Characterization of a Spin Quantum Heat Engine, Phys. Rev. L ett. 123, 240601 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat en gine, J

    R. Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat en gine, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12, L103 (1979)

    1979

  18. [18]

    Kosloff, A quantum mechanical open system as a model of a heat engine, J

    R. Kosloff, A quantum mechanical open system as a model of a heat engine, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 1625 (1984)

    1984

  19. [19]

    Geva and R

    E. Geva and R. Kosloff, A quantum-mechanical heat engine operating in finite time. A model consisting of spin-1/2 syst ems as the working fluid, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 3054 (1992)

    1992

  20. [20]

    H. T. Quan, Y. X. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum therm odynamic cycles and quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E 76, 031105 (2007)

    2007

  21. [21]

    Kosloff and Y

    R. Kosloff and Y. Rezek, The quantum harmonic Otto cycle, Entropy 19, 136 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real Spectra in Non-Hermi tian Hamiltonians Having PT Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)

    1998

  23. [23]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonia ns, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947 (2007)

    2007

  24. [24]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Mussl imani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys. 14, 11 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    V. V. Konotop, J. Yang, and D. A. Zezyulin, Nonlinear wav es in PT -symmetric systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035002 (2016)

    2016

  26. [26]

    L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Non-Hermitian photon ics based on parity–time symmetry, Nat. Photonics 11, 752 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    ˙S. K. ¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity–time symmet ry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat. Mater. 18, 783 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    C. E. R¨ uter, K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christod oulides, M. Segev, and D. Kip, Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics, Nat. Phys. 6, 192 (2010)

    2010

  29. [29]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Lin and Z

    S. Lin and Z. Song, Non-Hermitian heat engine with all-q uantum-adiabatic-process cycle, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 475301 (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    Insinga, B

    A. Insinga, B. Andresen, P. Salamon, and R. Kosloff, Quan tum heat engines: Limit cycles and exceptional points, Phys . Rev. E 97, 062153 (2018)

    2018

  32. [32]

    Zhang, J.-Q

    J.-W. Zhang, J.-Q. Zhang, G.-Y. Ding, J.-C. Li, J.-T. Bu , B. Wang, L.-L. Yan, S.-L. Su, L. Chen, F. Nori, ˙S. K. ¨Ozdemir, F. Zhou, H. Jing, and M. Feng, Dynamical control of quantum he at engines using exceptional points, Nat. Commun. 13, 6225 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    S. K. Manikandan, S. Ghosh, and S. Nandi, J. Phys. A: Math . Theor. 52, 185302 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Colin and A

    S. Colin and A. Matzkin, Non-locality and time-depende nt boundary conditions: A Klein-Gordon perspective, EPL 130, 50003 (2020). 15

    2020

  35. [35]

    R. A. Alves, A. Guerreiro, and M. Navarro-C ´ ıa, Bridging the hydrodynamic Drude model and local transformation opt ics theory, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235412 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Dolezal and R

    J. Dolezal and R. L. Jack, Long-ranged correlations in l arge deviations of local clustering, Phys. Rev. E 103, 052132 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Khandelwal, N

    S. Khandelwal, N. Brunner, and G. Haack, Signatures of L iouvillian Exceptional Points in a Quantum Thermal Machine , PRX Quantum 2, 040346 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermitian representation of quantum mechanics, Int

    A. Mostafazadeh, Pseudo-Hermitian representation of quantum mechanics, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 7, 1191 (2010)

    2010

  39. [39]

    T. R. de Oliveira and D. Jonathan, Efficiency gain and bidi rectional operation of quantum engines with decoupled inte rnal levels, Phys. Rev. E 104, 044133 (2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    M. F. Anka, T. R. de Oliveira, and D. Jonathan, Work and effi ciency fluctuations in a quantum Otto cycle with idle levels, Phys. Rev. E 109, 064129 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Li, P.-P

    Y. Li, P.-P. Zhang, L.-Z. Hu, Y.-L. Xu, and X.-M. Kong, Gr ound-state and thermal entanglements in non-Hermitian XY system with real and imaginary magnetic fields, Quantum Inf. Process. 22, 277 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Gardas, S

    B. Gardas, S. Deffner, and A. Saxena, Non-Hermitian quan tum thermodynamics, Sci. Rep. 6, 23408 (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    C. D. Bruzewicz, J. Chiaverini, R. McConnell, and J. M. S age, Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challeng es, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021314 (2019)

    2019

  44. [44]

    J. Li, Z. Luo, T. Xin, H. Wang, D. Lu, and B. Zeng, Experime ntal implementation of efficient quantum pseudorandomness on a 12-spin system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 030502 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. H¨ anggi, and P. Talkner, Colloquium: Qua ntum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 771 (2011)

    2011

  46. [46]

    Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation th eorems and molecular machines, Rep

    U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation th eorems and molecular machines, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 126001 (2012)

    2012

  47. [47]

    Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Phys

    C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997)

    1997

  48. [48]

    G. E. Crooks, Nonequilibrium measurements of free ener gy differences for microscopically reversible Markovian sy stems, J. Stat. Phys. 90, 1481 (1999)

    1999

  49. [49]

    Esposito, U

    M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequilibriu m fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statisti cs in quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1665 (2009)

    2009

  50. [50]

    Brollo, A

    A. Brollo, A. del Campo and A. Bastianello, Universal effi ciency boost in prethermal quantum heat engines at negative temperature, Nat. Commun. 16,10593 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    W. K. Wootters, Entanglement of formation of an arbitra ry state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998)

    1998

  52. [52]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Entangle ment in many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008)

    2008

  53. [53]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horode cki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)

    2009

  54. [54]

    Chitambar and G

    E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Quantum resource theories, Re v. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019)

    2019