Wigner's Phase Space Current for Variable Beam Splitters -- Phase Space Rotations and Newtonian Trajectories

Hsien-Yi Hsieh; Hua-Li Chen; Ole Steuernagel; Ray-Kuang Lee

arxiv: 2606.24334 · v1 · pith:QJC34EXWnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Wigner's Phase Space Current for Variable Beam Splitters -- Phase Space Rotations and Newtonian Trajectories

Ole Steuernagel , Hsien-Yi Hsieh , Hua-Li Chen , Ray-Kuang Lee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 00:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics

keywords Wigner distributionbeam splittersphase space currentmode mixingcontinuous variable quantum systemsquantum optics

0 comments

The pith

Variable beam splitters rotate the two positions and the two momenta simultaneously in Wigner's phase space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper derives the Wigner current for variable beam splitters acting on two continuous single-mode systems. It establishes that the mixing dynamics consist of simultaneous rotations in the position plane and the momentum plane. The continuity equation for the Wigner distribution allows a classical trajectories approach to track how the modes influence each other. Such a description would make the superposition process at beam splitters geometrically transparent and expressible without full quantum calculations.

Core claim

The dynamics for variable beam splitters amounts to a rotation confined within the plane of the two positions together with the same simultaneous rotation confined within the plane of the two momenta. Explicit and very transparent expressions for the rotated Wigner distributions and Wigner currents can be given in terms of classical trajectories. This helps gain deeper insights and perform geometrical analyses of the mixing of modes at beam splitters.

What carries the argument

The Wigner current J, obtained from the continuity equation partial_tau W = - nabla J for the beam-splitter interaction.

Load-bearing premise

The evolution of the Wigner distribution under the beam-splitter interaction is governed by a continuity equation involving the derived current.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement showing that the Wigner function evolution under a variable beam splitter does not correspond to simultaneous rotations in the position and momentum planes would disprove the claim.

read the original abstract

Beam splitters allow us to superpose two continuous single mode quantum systems. To study the behaviour of beam splitters' strongly mode mixing dynamics we consider variable beam splitters acting on Wigner's phase space distribution, W , the evolution of which is governed by the continuity-equation {\partial \tau} W = - {\nabla} J. We derive the form of the corresponding Wigner current, J. J's form allows us to use a classical trajectories-approach to analyze the influence of the two modes on each other. We show that the dynamics for variable beam splitters amounts to a rotation confined within the plane of the two positions together with the same simultaneous rotation confined within the plane of the two momenta. In this way explicit and very transparent expressions for the rotated Wigner distributions and Wigner currents can be given in terms of classical trajectories. This helps us to gain deeper insights and perform geometrical analyses of the mixing of modes at beam splitters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives the explicit Wigner current J for variable beam splitters and shows it generates simultaneous rotations in the (x1,x2) and (p1,p2) planes via classical trajectories.

read the letter

Hi,

The main takeaway is that for variable beam splitters the Wigner current produces a rotation confined to the two-position plane and the identical rotation in the two-momentum plane, with explicit expressions for the rotated W and J written in terms of classical trajectories.

What is new is the concrete derivation of J starting from the continuity equation and the reduction to those simultaneous rotations for the variable-strength case. The paper does this cleanly and gives a geometric trajectory picture of how the modes mix.

This works because the beam-splitter Hamiltonian is quadratic in the quadratures. For any quadratic H the Moyal bracket reduces exactly to the Poisson bracket, so the Wigner function obeys the classical continuity equation with the classical phase-space velocity field; the paper simply writes down the explicit form of that field. The stress-test note is right that there is no hidden assumption or inconsistency once the quadratic character is recognized. The result holds exactly, with no approximation.

The soft spot is that the underlying fact is standard for quadratic Hamiltonians, so the novelty is mainly in spelling out the explicit J and the separated position/momentum rotations for the variable case rather than a deeper reorganization of the physics. No load-bearing flaw, just limited scope.

The math and the approach look solid on the evidence given. This is for people in quantum optics who use phase-space methods and want an intuitive trajectory view of beam-splitter mixing. A reader interested in geometric analyses of linear optical elements would get direct value from the explicit rotations.

It deserves a serious referee because the derivation is concrete and the geometric picture is useful even if the core fact is expected for quadratic systems. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes variable beam splitters acting on the Wigner phase-space distribution W of two continuous-variable modes. It starts from the continuity equation ∂_τ W = −∇·J, derives the explicit form of the Wigner current J for the beam-splitter interaction, and concludes that the resulting flow consists of simultaneous, identical rotations in the (x1,x2) plane and the (p1,p2) plane. This permits an exact classical-trajectory description of the mode mixing and yields closed-form expressions for the evolved W and J.

Significance. Because the beam-splitter Hamiltonian is quadratic in the quadratures, the Moyal bracket reduces exactly to the Poisson bracket; the Wigner function therefore obeys the classical continuity equation with an explicitly rotational velocity field. The manuscript supplies the concrete J that generates this flow and shows how the resulting trajectories give transparent, geometrically interpretable expressions for the rotated distributions. This classical-phase-space picture is a standard but useful consequence of quadratic evolution and may aid geometric analyses in quantum optics.

minor comments (1)

The abstract states the continuity-equation premise and the rotation conclusion without intermediate steps; while the full text presumably supplies the derivation, a brief outline of the key algebraic steps in the abstract would improve immediate readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, the clear summary of its contributions, and the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from quadratic Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper starts from the standard continuity equation for W under a quadratic beam-splitter Hamiltonian (known to make the Moyal bracket identical to the Poisson bracket). It then derives the explicit classical current J whose flow is a simultaneous rotation in the (x1,x2) and (p1,p2) planes. This is a direct consequence of the quadratic form rather than a self-definition, fitted input, or self-citation chain. No equations reduce to their own inputs by construction, and the central claim has independent content from the quadratic property.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5711 in / 1025 out tokens · 13140 ms · 2026-06-26T00:19:28.186546+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Monitoring Beam Splitter Entanglement using Quantumness
quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Two squeezed vacua are entangled via balanced beam splitter mixing, with quantumness Ξ conserved under ideal conditions to benchmark experimental performance by pre/post comparison.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

ℏ 2 ← − −∂ ∂xa − − →∂ ∂pa − ← − −∂ ∂pa − − →∂ ∂xa !# ×sin

e i ℏ py .(2) If ˆOis a (normalized) single-mode density ma- trix ˆϱ, then the associated normalized distribution in the Wigner formulation is the Wigner distribution W(x, p, τ)≡ W[ˆϱ] 2πℏ .(3) Assuming that the hamiltonianW[ ˆH(ˆx,ˆp)] =H(x, p) is smooth enough, namely, has a global Taylor expansion, the Wigner transform of the von Neumann time evolution...
[2]

= 1√ 2   xa +x b pa +p b xb −x a pb −p a   (20a) andr(r ′, 1
[3]

= 1√ 2   x′ a −x ′ b p′ a −p ′ b x′ b +x ′ a p′ b +p ′ a   .(20b) IV. CONNECTIONS WITH MEASURED QUADRATURES In balanced homodyne detection (BHD) experiments, the field quadratures ⟨ˆxa(θa)⟩=⟨ ˆae−iθa +ˆa†eiθa √ 2 ⟩=⟨ˆxcos(θ a) + ˆpsin(θa)⟩(21) can be measured [38, 42] by the experimenter choosing the homodyne laser’s reference phase,θ a. 4 This, in ...
[4]

U. M. Titulaer and R. J. Glauber, Density operators for coherent fields, Phys. Rev.145, 1041 (1966)

1966
[5]

C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by in- terference, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2044 (1987)

2044
[6]

R. A. Campos, B. E. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Quantum- mechanical lossless beam splitter: Su (2) symmetry and photon statistics, Phys. Rev. A40, 1371 (1989)

1989
[7]

Leonhardt, Quantum statistics of a lossless beam split- ter: Su(2) symmetry in phase space, Phys

U. Leonhardt, Quantum statistics of a lossless beam split- ter: Su(2) symmetry in phase space, Phys. Rev. A48, 3265 (1993)

1993
[8]

Dakna, L

M. Dakna, L. Kn¨ oll, and D.-G. Welsch, Quantum state engineering using conditional measurement on a beam splitter, Eur. Phys. J. D - At. Mol. Opt. Phys.3, 10.1007/s100530050177 (1998)

work page doi:10.1007/s100530050177 1998
[9]

Bauke and N

H. Bauke and N. R. Itzhak, Visualizing quantum me- chanics in phase space (2011), 1101.2683

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[10]

Steuernagel, D

O. Steuernagel, D. Kakofengitis, and G. Ritter, Wigner flow reveals topological order in quantum phase space dy- namics, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 030401 (2013), 1208.2970

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[11]

Oliva and O

M. Oliva and O. Steuernagel, Quantum kerr oscillators’ evolution in phase space: Wigner current, symmetries, shear suppression and special states, Phys. Rev. A99, 032104 (2019), 1811.02952

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[12]

W. F. Braasch, O. D. Friedman, A. J. Rimberg, and M. P. Blencowe, Wigner current for open quantum sys- tems, Phys. Rev. A100, 012124 (2019)

2019
[13]

Chen, H.-Y

Y.-R. Chen, H.-Y. Hsieh, J. Ning, H.-C. Wu, H.-L. Chen, Y.-L. Chuang, P. Yang, O. Steuernagel, C.-M. Wu, and R.-K. Lee, Experimental reconstruction of wigner phase-space current, Phys. Rev. A108, 023729 (2023), 2111.08285

arXiv 2023
[14]

Wigner, On the Quantum Correction For Thermody- namic Equilibrium, Phys

E. Wigner, On the Quantum Correction For Thermody- namic Equilibrium, Phys. Rev.40, 749 (1932)

1932
[15]

Hillery, R

M. Hillery, R. F. O’Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, Distribution functions in physics: Fundamen- tals, Phys. Rep.106, 121 (1984)

1984
[16]

A. C. Hirshfeld and P. Henselder, Deformation quantiza- tion in the teaching of quantum mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 70, 537 (2002), quant-ph/0208163

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[17]

Hancock, M

J. Hancock, M. A. Walton, and B. Wynder, Quantum mechanics another way, Eur. J. Phys.25, 525 (2004), physics/0405029

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[18]

W. B. Case, Wigner functions and weyl transforms for pedestrians, Am. J. Phys.76, 937 (2008)

2008
[19]

Out of all quantum phase space distributions [45] only Wigner’s [12] yields the correct projections in Schr¨ odinger’s positionϱ(x, x, t) = R dp W(x, p, t) and momentum densities ˜ϱ(p, p, t) = R dx W(x, p, t), whilst giving the overlap between states in the simple form |⟨ψ1(x, t)|ψ2(x, t)⟩|2 = 2πℏ RR dxdp W1(x, p, t)W2(x, p, t)
[20]

M. V. Berry and N. L. Balazs, Evolution of semiclassical quantum states in phase space, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12, 625 (1979)

1979
[21]

H. J. Korsch and M. V. Berry, Evolution of wigner’s phase-space density under a nonintegrable quantum map, Phys. D Nonl. Phen.3, 627 (1981)

1981
[22]

Leonhardt and H

U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Measuring the quantum state of light, Prog. Quant. Elec.19, 89 (1995)

1995
[23]

W. P. Schleich,Quantum Optics in Phase Space(Wiley- VCH, 2001)

2001
[24]

W. H. Zurek, Sub-Planck structure in phase space and its relevance for quantum decoherence, Nature412, 712 (2001), quant-ph/0201118

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[25]

T. L. Curtright, D. B. Fairlie, and C. K. Zachos,A concise Treatise on Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space (World Scientific; Singapore, 2014)

2014
[26]

A. I. Lvovsky, Squeezed light (2016), arXiv:1401.4118 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[27]

Steuernagel and R.-K

O. Steuernagel and R.-K. Lee, Wigner’s phase space cur- rent for variable beam splitters—seeing beam splitters 6 in a new light, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B42, 194 (2025), 2308.06706

arXiv 2025
[28]

D. D. Nolte, The tangled tale of phase space, Phys. Today 63, 33 (2010)

2010
[29]

Kakofengitis and O

D. Kakofengitis and O. Steuernagel, Wigner’s quantum phase space flow in weakly-anharmonic weakly-excited two-state systems, Eur. Phys. J. Plus132, 381 (2017), 1411.3511

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[30]

Oliva and O

M. Oliva and O. Steuernagel, Dynamic shear suppression in quantum phase space, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 020401 (2019), 1708.00398

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[31]

J. E. Moyal, Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.45, 99 (1949)

1949
[32]

H. J. Groenewold, On the principles of elementary quan- tum mechanics, Physica12, 405 (1946)

1946
[33]

Takabayasi, The Formulation of Quantum Mechanics in terms of Ensemble in Phase Space, Prog

T. Takabayasi, The Formulation of Quantum Mechanics in terms of Ensemble in Phase Space, Prog. Theo. Phys. 11, 341 (1954)

1954
[34]

Oliva, D

M. Oliva, D. Kakofengitis, and O. Steuernagel, An- harmonic quantum mechanical systems do not feature phase space trajectories, Physica A502, 201 (2018), 1611.03303

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[35]

Here we only use Wigner’s for- mulation [16, 46]

There are several different formulations of quantum the- ory, Schr¨ odinger’s, Heisenberg’s, the phase space for- mulations due to Wigner, Moyal and Groenewold (and their offshoots due to Glauber and Sudarshan, Husimi and others), Feynman’s path integrals, the de Broglie– Bohm and many-worlds interpretation, spontaneous col- lapse models and others. Here ...
[36]

Donoso and C

A. Donoso and C. C. Martens, Quantum tunneling us- ing entangled classical trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 223202 (2001)

2001
[37]

R. T. Skodje, H. W. Rohrs, and J. VanBuskirk, Flux analysis, the correspondence principle, and the structure of quantum phase space, Phys. Rev. A40, 2894 (1989)

1989
[38]

Cohen, Lecture notes in quantum mechanics (2018), quant-ph/0605180

D. Cohen, Lecture notes in quantum mechanics (2018), quant-ph/0605180

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[39]

Steuernagel, Equivalence between free quantum parti- cles and those in harmonic potentials and its application to instantaneous changes, Eur

O. Steuernagel, Equivalence between free quantum parti- cles and those in harmonic potentials and its application to instantaneous changes, Eur. Phys. J. Plus129, 114 (2014), 1405.0445

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[40]

Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals Phys.325, 1790 (2010)

A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals Phys.325, 1790 (2010)

2010
[41]

A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 299 (2009)

2009
[42]

Leonhardt, Quantum physics of simple optical in- struments, Rep

U. Leonhardt, Quantum physics of simple optical in- struments, Rep. Prog. Phys.66, 1207 (2003), quant- ph/0305007

arXiv 2003
[43]

M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Experimental realization of any discrete unitary opera- tor, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 58 (1994)

1994
[44]

Steuernagel and R.-K

O. Steuernagel and R.-K. Lee, Lindblad superoperators from wigner’s phase space continuity equation, AIP Ad- vances15, 015009 (2025), 2307.16510

arXiv 2025
[45]

C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight,Introductory quantum op- tics(Cambridge university press, 2023)

2023
[46]

Chen, H.-Y

H.-L. Chen, H.-Y. Hsieh, C.-M. WU, O. Steuernagel, and R.-K. Lee, Monitoring beam splitter entanglement using quantumness, (2026), submitted

2026
[47]

Wang, Theorem for the beam-splitter entangler, Phys

X.-B. Wang, Theorem for the beam-splitter entangler, Phys. Rev. A66, 024303 (2002)

2002
[48]

K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, Density operators and quasiprobability distributions, Phys. Rev.177, 1882 (1969)

1969
[49]

D. F. Styer, M. S. Balkin, K. M. Becker, M. R. Burns, C. E. Dudley, S. T. Forth, J. S. Gaumer, M. A. Kramer, D. C. Oertel, L. H. Park,et al., Nine formulations of quantum mechanics, AJP70, 288 (2002)

2002

[1] [1]

ℏ 2 ← − −∂ ∂xa − − →∂ ∂pa − ← − −∂ ∂pa − − →∂ ∂xa !# ×sin

e i ℏ py .(2) If ˆOis a (normalized) single-mode density ma- trix ˆϱ, then the associated normalized distribution in the Wigner formulation is the Wigner distribution W(x, p, τ)≡ W[ˆϱ] 2πℏ .(3) Assuming that the hamiltonianW[ ˆH(ˆx,ˆp)] =H(x, p) is smooth enough, namely, has a global Taylor expansion, the Wigner transform of the von Neumann time evolution...

[2] [2]

= 1√ 2   xa +x b pa +p b xb −x a pb −p a   (20a) andr(r ′, 1

[3] [3]

= 1√ 2   x′ a −x ′ b p′ a −p ′ b x′ b +x ′ a p′ b +p ′ a   .(20b) IV. CONNECTIONS WITH MEASURED QUADRATURES In balanced homodyne detection (BHD) experiments, the field quadratures ⟨ˆxa(θa)⟩=⟨ ˆae−iθa +ˆa†eiθa √ 2 ⟩=⟨ˆxcos(θ a) + ˆpsin(θa)⟩(21) can be measured [38, 42] by the experimenter choosing the homodyne laser’s reference phase,θ a. 4 This, in ...

[4] [4]

U. M. Titulaer and R. J. Glauber, Density operators for coherent fields, Phys. Rev.145, 1041 (1966)

1966

[5] [5]

C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by in- terference, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2044 (1987)

2044

[6] [6]

R. A. Campos, B. E. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Quantum- mechanical lossless beam splitter: Su (2) symmetry and photon statistics, Phys. Rev. A40, 1371 (1989)

1989

[7] [7]

Leonhardt, Quantum statistics of a lossless beam split- ter: Su(2) symmetry in phase space, Phys

U. Leonhardt, Quantum statistics of a lossless beam split- ter: Su(2) symmetry in phase space, Phys. Rev. A48, 3265 (1993)

1993

[8] [8]

Dakna, L

M. Dakna, L. Kn¨ oll, and D.-G. Welsch, Quantum state engineering using conditional measurement on a beam splitter, Eur. Phys. J. D - At. Mol. Opt. Phys.3, 10.1007/s100530050177 (1998)

work page doi:10.1007/s100530050177 1998

[9] [9]

Bauke and N

H. Bauke and N. R. Itzhak, Visualizing quantum me- chanics in phase space (2011), 1101.2683

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[10] [10]

Steuernagel, D

O. Steuernagel, D. Kakofengitis, and G. Ritter, Wigner flow reveals topological order in quantum phase space dy- namics, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 030401 (2013), 1208.2970

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[11] [11]

Oliva and O

M. Oliva and O. Steuernagel, Quantum kerr oscillators’ evolution in phase space: Wigner current, symmetries, shear suppression and special states, Phys. Rev. A99, 032104 (2019), 1811.02952

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[12] [12]

W. F. Braasch, O. D. Friedman, A. J. Rimberg, and M. P. Blencowe, Wigner current for open quantum sys- tems, Phys. Rev. A100, 012124 (2019)

2019

[13] [13]

Chen, H.-Y

Y.-R. Chen, H.-Y. Hsieh, J. Ning, H.-C. Wu, H.-L. Chen, Y.-L. Chuang, P. Yang, O. Steuernagel, C.-M. Wu, and R.-K. Lee, Experimental reconstruction of wigner phase-space current, Phys. Rev. A108, 023729 (2023), 2111.08285

arXiv 2023

[14] [14]

Wigner, On the Quantum Correction For Thermody- namic Equilibrium, Phys

E. Wigner, On the Quantum Correction For Thermody- namic Equilibrium, Phys. Rev.40, 749 (1932)

1932

[15] [15]

Hillery, R

M. Hillery, R. F. O’Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, Distribution functions in physics: Fundamen- tals, Phys. Rep.106, 121 (1984)

1984

[16] [16]

A. C. Hirshfeld and P. Henselder, Deformation quantiza- tion in the teaching of quantum mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 70, 537 (2002), quant-ph/0208163

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

[17] [17]

Hancock, M

J. Hancock, M. A. Walton, and B. Wynder, Quantum mechanics another way, Eur. J. Phys.25, 525 (2004), physics/0405029

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[18] [18]

W. B. Case, Wigner functions and weyl transforms for pedestrians, Am. J. Phys.76, 937 (2008)

2008

[19] [19]

Out of all quantum phase space distributions [45] only Wigner’s [12] yields the correct projections in Schr¨ odinger’s positionϱ(x, x, t) = R dp W(x, p, t) and momentum densities ˜ϱ(p, p, t) = R dx W(x, p, t), whilst giving the overlap between states in the simple form |⟨ψ1(x, t)|ψ2(x, t)⟩|2 = 2πℏ RR dxdp W1(x, p, t)W2(x, p, t)

[20] [20]

M. V. Berry and N. L. Balazs, Evolution of semiclassical quantum states in phase space, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12, 625 (1979)

1979

[21] [21]

H. J. Korsch and M. V. Berry, Evolution of wigner’s phase-space density under a nonintegrable quantum map, Phys. D Nonl. Phen.3, 627 (1981)

1981

[22] [22]

Leonhardt and H

U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Measuring the quantum state of light, Prog. Quant. Elec.19, 89 (1995)

1995

[23] [23]

W. P. Schleich,Quantum Optics in Phase Space(Wiley- VCH, 2001)

2001

[24] [24]

W. H. Zurek, Sub-Planck structure in phase space and its relevance for quantum decoherence, Nature412, 712 (2001), quant-ph/0201118

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

[25] [25]

T. L. Curtright, D. B. Fairlie, and C. K. Zachos,A concise Treatise on Quantum Mechanics in Phase Space (World Scientific; Singapore, 2014)

2014

[26] [26]

A. I. Lvovsky, Squeezed light (2016), arXiv:1401.4118 [quant-ph]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[27] [27]

Steuernagel and R.-K

O. Steuernagel and R.-K. Lee, Wigner’s phase space cur- rent for variable beam splitters—seeing beam splitters 6 in a new light, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B42, 194 (2025), 2308.06706

arXiv 2025

[28] [28]

D. D. Nolte, The tangled tale of phase space, Phys. Today 63, 33 (2010)

2010

[29] [29]

Kakofengitis and O

D. Kakofengitis and O. Steuernagel, Wigner’s quantum phase space flow in weakly-anharmonic weakly-excited two-state systems, Eur. Phys. J. Plus132, 381 (2017), 1411.3511

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[30] [30]

Oliva and O

M. Oliva and O. Steuernagel, Dynamic shear suppression in quantum phase space, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 020401 (2019), 1708.00398

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[31] [31]

J. E. Moyal, Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.45, 99 (1949)

1949

[32] [32]

H. J. Groenewold, On the principles of elementary quan- tum mechanics, Physica12, 405 (1946)

1946

[33] [33]

Takabayasi, The Formulation of Quantum Mechanics in terms of Ensemble in Phase Space, Prog

T. Takabayasi, The Formulation of Quantum Mechanics in terms of Ensemble in Phase Space, Prog. Theo. Phys. 11, 341 (1954)

1954

[34] [34]

Oliva, D

M. Oliva, D. Kakofengitis, and O. Steuernagel, An- harmonic quantum mechanical systems do not feature phase space trajectories, Physica A502, 201 (2018), 1611.03303

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[35] [35]

Here we only use Wigner’s for- mulation [16, 46]

There are several different formulations of quantum the- ory, Schr¨ odinger’s, Heisenberg’s, the phase space for- mulations due to Wigner, Moyal and Groenewold (and their offshoots due to Glauber and Sudarshan, Husimi and others), Feynman’s path integrals, the de Broglie– Bohm and many-worlds interpretation, spontaneous col- lapse models and others. Here ...

[36] [36]

Donoso and C

A. Donoso and C. C. Martens, Quantum tunneling us- ing entangled classical trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 223202 (2001)

2001

[37] [37]

R. T. Skodje, H. W. Rohrs, and J. VanBuskirk, Flux analysis, the correspondence principle, and the structure of quantum phase space, Phys. Rev. A40, 2894 (1989)

1989

[38] [38]

Cohen, Lecture notes in quantum mechanics (2018), quant-ph/0605180

D. Cohen, Lecture notes in quantum mechanics (2018), quant-ph/0605180

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[39] [39]

Steuernagel, Equivalence between free quantum parti- cles and those in harmonic potentials and its application to instantaneous changes, Eur

O. Steuernagel, Equivalence between free quantum parti- cles and those in harmonic potentials and its application to instantaneous changes, Eur. Phys. J. Plus129, 114 (2014), 1405.0445

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[40] [40]

Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals Phys.325, 1790 (2010)

A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynamics, Annals Phys.325, 1790 (2010)

2010

[41] [41]

A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 299 (2009)

2009

[42] [42]

Leonhardt, Quantum physics of simple optical in- struments, Rep

U. Leonhardt, Quantum physics of simple optical in- struments, Rep. Prog. Phys.66, 1207 (2003), quant- ph/0305007

arXiv 2003

[43] [43]

M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, Experimental realization of any discrete unitary opera- tor, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 58 (1994)

1994

[44] [44]

Steuernagel and R.-K

O. Steuernagel and R.-K. Lee, Lindblad superoperators from wigner’s phase space continuity equation, AIP Ad- vances15, 015009 (2025), 2307.16510

arXiv 2025

[45] [45]

C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight,Introductory quantum op- tics(Cambridge university press, 2023)

2023

[46] [46]

Chen, H.-Y

H.-L. Chen, H.-Y. Hsieh, C.-M. WU, O. Steuernagel, and R.-K. Lee, Monitoring beam splitter entanglement using quantumness, (2026), submitted

2026

[47] [47]

Wang, Theorem for the beam-splitter entangler, Phys

X.-B. Wang, Theorem for the beam-splitter entangler, Phys. Rev. A66, 024303 (2002)

2002

[48] [48]

K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber, Density operators and quasiprobability distributions, Phys. Rev.177, 1882 (1969)

1969

[49] [49]

D. F. Styer, M. S. Balkin, K. M. Becker, M. R. Burns, C. E. Dudley, S. T. Forth, J. S. Gaumer, M. A. Kramer, D. C. Oertel, L. H. Park,et al., Nine formulations of quantum mechanics, AJP70, 288 (2002)

2002