Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 cited by

Two independently tuned quantum antidots measure the elementary exchange of non-abelian anyons by comparing interference signals from single and double cooperative processes.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-26 07:40 UTC pith:ITZCONFL

load-bearing objection This is a conceptual device proposal that extends Abelian antidot interferometry to non-Abelian anyons via dual-antidot cooperative tunnelling, but the mapping to isolated exchange phases is stated without derivations or checks. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.24930 v1 pith:ITZCONFL submitted 2026-06-22 cond-mat.mes-hall

Non-Abelian Anyon Braiding with Quantum-Antidot Interferometry

Junyu Tang , Gang v. Chen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords non-abelian anyonsquantum antidotsinterferometryanyon braidingtopological statisticsfractional quantum Hallfusion channelscooperative tunnelling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an interferometry setup using two gate-controlled quantum antidots to probe the elementary π-rotation exchanges of non-abelian anyons. Conventional Fabry-Perot interferometry only accesses full braids, but this method uses cooperative tunnelling processes corresponding to different braids. By comparing interference signals from single and double processes for unresolved fusion channels, it directly measures the exchange and topological spins. This provides a practical route to detect non-abelian statistics that could be key for topological quantum computing.

Core claim

By tuning two antidots independently, the device realizes distinct cooperative tunnelling processes corresponding to different braids of non-abelian anyons. For unresolved local fusion channels, the difference between the interference signals of the single and double cooperative processes measures the elementary exchange, directly probing non-abelian statistics and topological spins. For resolved channels, the double-cooperative process shows reduced interference amplitude.

What carries the argument

Two gate-controlled quantum antidots enabling independent tuning to realize single and double cooperative tunnelling processes that map to different anyon braids.

Load-bearing premise

Independent tuning of two antidots can controllably realize distinct cooperative tunnelling processes that map onto different braids and that the interference signals from single versus double processes can be cleanly separated without dominant decoherence or background effects.

What would settle it

If experiments show identical interference signals for single and double processes in unresolved fusion channels, or if signals cannot be separated due to decoherence, the proposed measurement of elementary exchange would not hold.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Enables direct measurement of elementary anyon exchanges rather than only full braids.
  • Distinguishes resolved and unresolved fusion channels through interference amplitude differences.
  • Provides access to topological spins of the anyons.
  • Offers a route for manipulating and detecting non-abelian braiding with fundamental fractional statistics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be combined with existing anyon detection techniques to verify non-abelian behavior in specific quantum Hall states.
  • Successful implementation would open paths to braiding operations for topological quantum computation.
  • The approach might generalize to other non-abelian anyon platforms beyond the proposed setup.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a two-antidot interferometry scheme for non-Abelian anyons in which independent gate tuning of the antidots realizes distinct cooperative tunneling processes that map onto different braids. For unresolved local fusion channels the difference between the interference signals of the single- and double-cooperative processes is asserted to isolate the elementary exchange phase, thereby directly probing non-Abelian statistics and topological spins; for resolved channels the double-cooperative amplitude is reduced.

Significance. If the mapping from antidot tuning to braid operators and the clean isolation of the exchange phase can be established, the scheme would extend existing Abelian-antidot interferometry to non-Abelian statistics and supply a measurable signature of elementary π-exchange that conventional Fabry-Perot setups cannot access.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the difference between single- and double-cooperative interference signals isolates the elementary exchange phase for unresolved fusion channels is stated without any derivation, explicit braid-operator mapping, or quantitative estimate of dynamical-phase cancellation or fusion-channel mixing.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the premise that independent tuning of two antidots controllably produces distinct cooperative tunneling amplitudes whose interference can be cleanly separated from decoherence and background contributions is asserted but not supported by any analysis or simulation of the relevant energy scales or visibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the two major comments on the abstract below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the difference between single- and double-cooperative interference signals isolates the elementary exchange phase for unresolved fusion channels is stated without any derivation, explicit braid-operator mapping, or quantitative estimate of dynamical-phase cancellation or fusion-channel mixing.

    Authors: The explicit braid-operator mapping, derivation of the interference signals, and analysis of dynamical-phase cancellation together with fusion-channel mixing are provided in Sections III and IV of the main text. The abstract is written as a concise summary in the conventional style. To address the concern we will revise the abstract to include a brief reference to the mapping and the relevant sections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the premise that independent tuning of two antidots controllably produces distinct cooperative tunneling amplitudes whose interference can be cleanly separated from decoherence and background contributions is asserted but not supported by any analysis or simulation of the relevant energy scales or visibility.

    Authors: The manuscript contains an analytical discussion of the relevant energy scales and visibility in the device-parameter section. We agree that a more explicit quantitative estimate would strengthen the presentation and will add a short paragraph with order-of-magnitude estimates drawn from typical experimental parameters, together with a corresponding update to the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of Abelian antidot work; central proposal independent

full rationale

The paper proposes a new interferometry device using two independently tuned quantum antidots to realize cooperative tunnelling processes that map to distinct braids, with the difference in interference signals isolating the elementary exchange for unresolved fusion channels. It references the Abelian antidot proposal but presents the non-Abelian extension and signal distinction as a fresh construction without any equations or parameters that reduce the claimed measurement to a prior fit or self-defined quantity. No load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is visible in the provided abstract and description. This is the normal case of a proposal with independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, preventing identification of specific free parameters or detailed axioms; the proposal implicitly assumes standard non-Abelian anyon braiding rules and experimental controllability of antidot tunnelling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5699 in / 1194 out tokens · 40331 ms · 2026-06-26T07:40:39.636858+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Conventional Fabry--Perot interferometry accesses only full braids of anyons and therefore cannot directly probe the elementary \(\pi\)-rotation exchange. Motivated by the recent quantum-antidot proposal for the Abelian anyons, we propose an interferometry for probing the elementary exchanges of non-abelian anyons using two gate-controlled quantum antidots. By tuning two antidots independently, the device realizes distinct cooperative tunnelling processes, which correspond to different braids of non-abelian anyons. For the unresolved local fusion channels, the difference between the interference signals of the single and double cooperative processes allows us to measure the elementary exchange of the non-abelian anyons, providing a direct probe of their non-abelian statistics and topological spins. For the resolved local fusion channels, the double-cooperative process is further distinguished by a reduced interference amplitude. Our work provides a promising and practical route for manipulating and detecting non-abelian braiding with the fundamental fractional statistics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24930 by Gang v. Chen, Junyu Tang.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) The blackboard framed diagram of the braid-world [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DC Conductance of X-shaped Majorana Interferometer reveals Non-Abelian Anyon Statistics

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    In an X-shaped chiral Majorana interferometer, simultaneous edge-vortex and Majorana tunneling activates the fermionic fusion channel and yields a finite isotropic DC conductance with a topological-spin offset.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Using Eq

    The Hopf link is related to the monodromyMmatrix through the ribbon identity as Hopf[a,b] = ∑x dxRab x Rba x =d adbMab, where fusion multiplicities have been omitted because they all equal to one for the physical non-abelian anyons. Using Eq. (4), we cal- culate the interferometric amplitudes for all the possible cases and the results are listed in Table ...

  2. [2]

    Nakamura, S

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Manfra, Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics, Nature Physics16, 931 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. D. Sarma, Clarification of braiding statistics in fabry–perot interferometry, Nature Physics20, 381 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    S. A. Kivelson and C. Murthy, Modified interferometer to mea- sure anyonic braiding statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 126605 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    For the interference between two different paths, we can at most place two QADs in the edge. If one tries to place one more QAD at the edges, the two paths will have different tunneling ampli- tude and most importantly, the interference will be suppressed since it corresponds to the higher orders of tunneling process

  6. [6]

    Stern and B

    A. Stern and B. I. Halperin, Proposed experiments to probe the non-abelianν=5/2 quantum hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 016802 (2006)

    2006

  7. [7]

    Bonderson, A

    P. Bonderson, A. Kitaev, and K. Shtengel, Detecting non- abelian statistics in theν=5/2 fractional quantum hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 016803 (2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    Bonderson, K

    P. Bonderson, K. Shtengel, and J. K. Slingerland, Probing non- abelian statistics with quasiparticle interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 016401 (2006)

    2006

  9. [9]

    Bishara, P

    W. Bishara, P. Bonderson, C. Nayak, K. Shtengel, and J. K. Slingerland, Interferometric signature of non-abelian anyons, Phys. Rev. B80, 155303 (2009)

    2009

  10. [10]

    Stern, B

    A. Stern, B. Rosenow, R. Ilan, and B. I. Halperin, Interference, coulomb blockade, and the identification of non-abelian quan- tum hall states, Phys. Rev. B82, 085321 (2010)

    2010

  11. [11]

    B. I. Halperin, A. Stern, I. Neder, and B. Rosenow, Theory of the fabry-pérot quantum hall interferometer, Phys. Rev. B83, 155440 (2011)

    2011

  12. [12]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect, Nucl. Phys. B360, 362 (1991)

    1991

  13. [13]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  14. [14]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys.321, 2 (2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    Reshetikhin and V

    N. Reshetikhin and V . G. Turaev, Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups, Communications in Mathematical Physics127, 1 (1990)

    1990

  16. [16]

    S. H. Simon,Topological Quantum(Oxford University Press, 2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Aghaee and others (Microsoft Azure Quantum), Interfer- ometric single-shot parity measurement in inas–al hybrid de- vices, Nature638, 651 (2025)

    M. Aghaee and others (Microsoft Azure Quantum), Interfer- ometric single-shot parity measurement in inas–al hybrid de- vices, Nature638, 651 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    van Loo, F

    N. van Loo, F. Zatelli, G. O. Steffensen, B. Roovers, G. Wang, T. Van Caekenberghe, A. Bordin, D. van Driel, Y . Zhang, W. D. Huisman, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, G. P. Mazur, R. Aguado, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Single-shot parity readout of a minimal Kitaev chain, Nature650, 334 (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    See details in [URL will be inserted by publisher] for the Sup- plementary Material

  20. [20]

    In principle, one can distinguish the AB phase induced by the change of enclosed area and the phase due 6 to the elementary exchange

    The effect of applied voltage to the enclosed area has been dis- cussed in details in [3]. In principle, one can distinguish the AB phase induced by the change of enclosed area and the phase due 6 to the elementary exchange

  21. [21]

    Gharavi, D

    K. Gharavi, D. Hoving, and J. Baugh, Readout of majorana par- ity states using a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B94, 155417 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    Baraban, G

    M. Baraban, G. Zikos, N. Bonesteel, and S. H. Simon, Numer- ical analysis of quasiholes of the moore-read wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 076801 (2009)

    2009

  23. [23]

    Bonderson, Splitting the topological degeneracy of non- abelian anyons, Phys

    P. Bonderson, Splitting the topological degeneracy of non- abelian anyons, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 110403 (2009)

    2009

  24. [24]

    Cheng, R

    M. Cheng, R. M. Lutchyn, V . Galitski, and S. Das Sarma, Split- ting of majorana-fermion modes due to intervortex tunneling in ap x +ip y superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 107001 (2009)

    2009

  25. [25]

    Mi- croscopically, the resolved- and unresolved-fusion regimes are controlled by the competition between the local fusion splitting and the experimental broadening scales

    In principle, whether the fusion channel is fixed or not, can be tested by measuring their total the topological charge. Mi- croscopically, the resolved- and unresolved-fusion regimes are controlled by the competition between the local fusion splitting and the experimental broadening scales. When the splitting be- tween the fusion channels is small compar...

  26. [26]

    Nevertheless, we find that although(FRF −1)R̸=R(FRF −1), they have the same diagonal elements

    A subtle point is that, the matrix representation actuallly de- pends on the order of fusion and the braiding. Nevertheless, we find that although(FRF −1)R̸=R(FRF −1), they have the same diagonal elements

  27. [27]

    If the coherence time ex- ceeds the propagation time, the cooperative process can be de- scribed coherently; otherwise it crosses over to the sequentially resolved limit

    The competition between the fusion-state coherence time and the propagation time between the two QADs governs the crossover between the two limits. If the coherence time ex- ceeds the propagation time, the cooperative process can be de- scribed coherently; otherwise it crosses over to the sequentially resolved limit

  28. [28]

    Bonderson,Non-Abelian Anyons and Interferometry, Ph.D

    P. Bonderson,Non-Abelian Anyons and Interferometry, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (2007)

    2007

  29. [29]

    Fendley, M

    P. Fendley, M. P. A. Fisher, and C. Nayak, Edge states and tun- neling of non-abelian quasiparticles in theν=5/2 quantum hall state andp+ipsuperconductors, Phys. Rev. B75, 045317 (2007)

    2007

  30. [30]

    Veillon, C

    A. Veillon, C. Piquard, P. Glidic, Y . Sato, A. Aassime, A. Ca- vanna, Y . Jin, U. Gennser, A. Anthore, and F. Pierre, Observa- tion of the scaling dimension of fractional quantum hall anyons, Nature632, 517 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Read and E

    N. Read and E. Rezayi, Beyond paired quantum hall states: Parafermions and incompressible states in the first excited lan- dau level, Phys. Rev. B59, 8084 (1999)

    1999

  32. [32]

    R. S. K. Mong, M. P. Zaletel, F. Pollmann, and Z. Papi ´c, Fi- bonacci anyons and charge density order in the 12/5 and 13/5 quantum hall plateaus, Phys. Rev. B95, 115136 (2017)

    2017

  33. [33]

    W. Zhu, S. S. Gong, F. D. M. Haldane, and D. N. Sheng, Frac- tional quantum hall states atν=13/5 and 12/5 and their non- abelian nature, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 126805 (2015)

    2015

  34. [34]

    D. A. Ivanov, Non-abelian statistics of half-quantum vortices in p-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 268 (2001)

    2001

  35. [35]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two di- mensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  36. [36]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    One should not confuse the propagating chiral Majorana edge mode in topological superconductor with the non-Abelian Ising anyonσ. The freely propagating edge Majorana corresponds to the neutral fermion sectorψin the language of Ising TQFT, whereas the non-Abelianσobject is associated with a vor- tex/defect carrying a Majorana zero mode

  38. [38]

    A. Nava, R. Egger, F. Hassler, and D. Giuliano, Non-abelian anyon statistics through ac conductance of a majorana interfer- ometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 146604 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Adagideli, F

    ˙I. Adagideli, F. Hassler, A. Hyart, M. Burrello, B. van Heck, D. I. Pikulin, T. Karzig, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Time-resolved electrical detection of chiral edge vortex braiding, SciPost Physics8, 013 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, P. Baireuther, Y . Herasymenko, I. Adagideli, L. Wang, and A. R. Akhmerov, Deterministic cre- ation and braiding of chiral edge vortices, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 146803 (2019)

    2019

  41. [41]

    M. I. K. Munk, J. Schulenborg, R. Egger, and K. Flensberg, Parity-to-charge conversion in majorana qubit readout, Physical Review Research2, 033254 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    Pekker, C.-Y

    D. Pekker, C.-Y . Hou, V . E. Manucharyan, and E. Demler, Pro- posal for coherent coupling of majorana zero modes and su- perconducting qubits using the 4πjosephson effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 107007 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. A. Bridges, J.-Q. Yan, A. A. Aczel, L. Li, M. B. Stone, G. E. Granroth, M. D. Lumsden, Y . Yiu, J. Knolle, S. Bhattacharjee, D. L. Kovrizhin, R. Moessner, D. A. Tennant, D. G. Mandrus, and S. E. Nagler, Proximate kitaev quantum spin liquid behaviour in a honeycomb magnet, Nature Materi- als15, 733 (2016)

    2016

  44. [44]

    J. c. v. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Kitaev- heisenberg model on a honeycomb lattice: Possible exotic phases in iridium oxidesA 2iro3, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 027204 (2010)

    2010

  45. [45]

    Kitagawa, T

    K. Kitagawa, T. Takayama, Y . Matsumoto, A. Kato, R. Takano, Y . Kishimoto, S. Bette, R. Dinnebier, G. Jackeli, and H. Tak- agi, A spin–orbital-entangled quantum liquid on a honeycomb lattice, Nature554, 341 (2018)

    2018

  46. [46]

    Klocke, J

    K. Klocke, J. E. Moore, J. Alicea, and G. Halász, Thermal probes of phonon-coupled kitaev spin liquids: From accurate extraction of quantized edge transport to anyon interferometry, Phys. Rev. X12, 011034 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Z. Wei, V . F. Mitrovi ´c, and D. E. Feldman, Thermal interfer- ometry of anyons in spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 167204 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    Wang and A

    H. Wang and A. Principi, Manipulating non-abelian anyons of kitaev quantum spin liquids with local magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B113, 014434 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    Z. Wei, N. Batra, V . F. Mitrovi´c, and D. E. Feldman, Thermal interferometry of anyons, Phys. Rev. B107, 104406 (2023). S1 Supplementary Material for Non-Abelian Anyon Braiding with Quantum-Antidot Interferometry Junyu Tang1 and Gang v. Chen1,2,3 1International Center for Quantum Materials, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 2Bei...

    2023

  50. [50]

    edge anyon

    Consequently, if the total charge is fixed toσ, we have the following relation Trcat(Wσ ) =d σ trV σ (Wσ ) = √ 2tr(Wσ ).(S2) On the other hand, when the total charge sectors isI⊕ψ, the categorical trace coincides with the ordinary trace as Trcat(W) =d I trV I (WI) +d ψ trV ψ (Wψ ) =tr(W).(S3) Note that even the total chargeqhas been fixed, the braid word ...