Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Wormholes force infinite towers of BPS EFT instantons that generate superpotential terms in N=1 axiverses.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 12:06 UTC pith:4R5CPOFR

load-bearing objection Solid multi-axion non-invertible construction plus a clean, conditional implication that the IDB forces infinite EFT-instanton superpotentials in N=1 axiverses. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.26004 v2 pith:4R5CPOFR submitted 2026-06-24 hep-th

Non-invertible symmetries in the axiverse, and the imaginary wormholes

classification hep-th
keywords axiversenon-invertible symmetriesimaginary wormholesImaginary Distance BoundEFT instantonsN=1 supergravityaxion shift symmetrieshigher-form symmetries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Four-dimensional theories with many axions and U(1) gauge fields carry both invertible and non-invertible generalized symmetries. The non-invertible axion shift symmetries protect the absence of an axion potential, yet they are broken by quantum gravity. The paper shows that imaginary wormholes, together with the Imaginary Distance Bound, convert that expectation into a concrete requirement: the low-energy theory must contain infinite towers of fundamental instantons. In supersymmetric N=1 axiverses the distinguished instantons are the BPS EFT ones; for homogeneity degree k=3 they produce infinitely many superpotential terms, while for higher k they produce non-BPS D-term corrections. The result supplies a bottom-up reason why string-like axiverse models must generate a dense set of non-perturbative corrections that break the residual non-invertible shift symmetries.

Core claim

In N=1 axiverse models the existence of imaginary wormholes plus the Imaginary Distance Bound implies that towers of BPS EFT instantons are required and generate infinitely many superpotential terms (especially for saxionic sectors of homogeneity k=3). The same logic organizes the full hierarchy of invertible and non-invertible higher-form symmetries and their breaking scales.

What carries the argument

Imaginary wormholes together with the Imaginary Distance Bound: analytically continued wormhole saddles whose on-shell action vanishes, forcing UV instanton corrections (the EFT instantons of the dual-saxion cone) to become order-one before a critical imaginary axion distance is crossed.

Load-bearing premise

The paper takes as given that imaginary wormholes signal a genuine inconsistency of the original effective theory that must be cured by new non-perturbative corrections (the Imaginary Distance Bound).

What would settle it

In an explicit string compactification with a k=3 saxionic sector, compute the spectrum of Euclidean branes wrapping movable cycles; if only finitely many such BPS EFT instantons appear, or if they fail to generate a superpotential that saturates the IDB, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • N=1 axiverse EFTs with k=3 must contain infinite towers of superpotential terms generated by BPS EFT instantons.
  • For k>3 the same wormholes require towers of non-BPS instantons that correct the Kähler potential (D-terms).
  • The non-invertible electric one-form and axion-shift symmetries enforce concrete hierarchies among the masses of monopoles, axion strings and charged particles.
  • Quantum-gravity breaking of non-invertible axion shifts is technically natural once the monopole and wormhole scales are taken into account.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the IDB is correct, the strong-CP problem in a multi-axion axiverse may be solved by the same infinite tower of EFT instantons that the wormholes demand, without additional fine-tuning.
  • The same logic should apply to any moduli space admitting homogeneous wormholes, not only axionic ones, suggesting a general bottom-up origin for dense non-perturbative spectra in quantum gravity.
  • Cases k=1,2 remain delicate because the saxion trajectories pass through infinite-distance points and the Gauss–Bonnet term diverges; settling them would either strengthen or sharply limit the claim.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the invertible and non-invertible generalized symmetries of four-dimensional axiverse EFTs with multiple axions and abelian gauge fields, including broad N=1 extensions with Kähler potentials of the form (2.20). It builds the winding two-form, magnetic one-form, non-invertible electric one-form (3.22) and non-invertible axion-shift (3.35) defects, derives their fusion/condensation structure, and extracts hierarchies among the associated breaking scales (4.18), (5.1). The second half assumes the Imaginary Distance Bound of [46,47] and shows that imaginary wormholes in N=1 models with homogeneity k≤3 force towers of BPS EFT instantons (charges in C_EFT_I) that generate infinitely many superpotential terms, with a detailed fermionic zero-mode analysis for k=3 yielding bilocal F-terms (6.74).

Significance. If the IDB is accepted, the work supplies a concrete bottom-up mechanism that converts the existence of imaginary wormholes into a requirement for infinite towers of BPS EFT instantons and superpotential terms in N=1 axiverses. The first half is a solid, self-contained generalization of the axion-Maxwell non-invertible symmetries of [45,48] to the multi-axion, multi-U(1) setting, with explicit right-coprime factorizations, half-higher-gauging constructions, and clear physical interpretations of the resulting scale hierarchies. The careful tracking of dual-saxion profiles, null-coordinate distances, fermionic zero modes and Gauss–Bonnet contributions in §6 is a genuine technical advance over earlier wormhole analyses and yields falsifiable statements (tower/sublattice versions of the axion WGC for k≤3) that can be checked in string compactifications.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim of §6.3–6.4 (and the abstract) that imaginary wormholes force infinitely many superpotential terms rests entirely on the external Imaginary Distance Bound of [46,47]. The authors correctly flag this as an assumption (§6 introduction), but the manuscript would be strengthened by a short, self-contained paragraph that isolates precisely which step of the IDB argument is used (the divergence of the large-L sector under imaginary Dirichlet data) and what would falsify the implication if that step fails.
  2. For k=1,2 the dual-saxion trajectory (6.49) reaches infinite field distance and the Gauss–Bonnet integral (6.79) diverges (§6.5). The authors note the issue but still list these cases among those that generate F-term towers. Either a controlled regularization that keeps the bilocal F-term structure intact, or an explicit restriction of the superpotential claim to k=3 (where the analysis is clean), is needed before the claim can be regarded as uniform for all k≤3.
minor comments (4)
  1. Notation for the dual saxionic cone P and the set C_WH is introduced in (2.27) and (6.36) but occasionally reused without re-stating the dependence on the homogeneity degree k; a brief reminder at the start of §6.2 would help.
  2. Appendix D on non-abelian sectors is useful but ends abruptly; a one-sentence statement of how the surviving quasi-continuous shifts (D.4) modify the IDB argument would close the loop.
  3. Figures 1 and 2 are clear, but the caption of Fig. 2 should explicitly identify which bullets are EFT versus non-EFT string charges for readers who skip §4.1.
  4. A few typographical slips: “peridicity” (2.1), “emphazise” (after 2.34), and the arXiv date stamp “6 Jul 2026” should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: IDB is external input; prior self-works supply independent model constructions, not tautological redefinitions of the superpotential-tower claim.

full rationale

The paper’s central claim (abstract, §§6.3–6.4) is an implication: accept the external Imaginary Distance Bound of Di Ubaldo–Iliesiu–Lin–Yan and Maldacena–Maloney–McPeak ([46,47]), then the existence of the homogeneous imaginary wormholes already constructed for the N=1 axiverse models forces towers of BPS EFT instantons (charges in CEFT_I) that generate infinitely many superpotential terms. The internal chain—from dual-saxion profiles (6.37)–(6.45), finite null-coordinate distance (6.47), vanishing on-shell action, and the fermionic zero-mode analysis producing bilocal F-terms (6.74)—is derived step-by-step from the two-derivative equations and supersymmetry without reducing any equation to an input by construction. The framework (saxionic cones, dual saxions, EFT strings/instantons, homogeneous wormholes) is imported from the authors’ earlier papers [55–58], but those works derive the solutions under stated assumptions that do not include the IDB or the superpotential-tower conclusion; they therefore function as independent prior results rather than self-definitional or uniqueness-imported circularities. There is no data fitting, no ansatz smuggled solely by self-citation, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern. The only load-bearing external premise is the IDB itself, already flagged as an assumption in the paper’s §6 introduction. Minor self-citation of the model-building apparatus is present but not load-bearing for the logical reduction of the claim. Hence overall circularity is negligible.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small set of standard Swampland and supersymmetry assumptions plus the external IDB proposal; no free parameters are fitted and the only new entities are re-interpretations of already-studied objects.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption No Global Symmetry Conjecture (exact global symmetries are absent in quantum gravity)
    Invoked throughout §§4–6 to require that all higher-form and zero-form symmetries are broken by dynamical objects or instantons.
  • domain assumption Weak Gravity Conjecture (and its multi-field convex-hull form) for strings and instantons
    Used in §4.1 and §6.3 to bound tensions and actions of EFT strings and BPS instantons.
  • ad hoc to paper Validity of the Imaginary Distance Bound of [46,47]
    Taken as an input that converts the existence of imaginary wormholes into a requirement for EFT modifications (§6).
  • domain assumption Existence and completeness of EFT strings and EFT instantons in the N=1 framework of [55–58]
    Assumed throughout §§4 and 6; their charges generate the relevant lattices and saturate WGC bounds.
  • domain assumption Homogeneity of the leading Kähler potential (degree k integer) and conical saxionic domains
    Defines the class of N=1 models under study (§2.2); used to obtain universal wormhole solutions.
invented entities (2)
  • Imaginary wormholes (analytic continuation of Giddings–Strominger-type solutions to imaginary axion profiles) independent evidence
    purpose: Provide the geometric objects whose divergence under imaginary Dirichlet conditions encodes the IDB
    Re-interpretation of known Euclidean solutions; independent evidence is the existence of the real-charge wormholes themselves.
  • EFT instantons (BPS instantons whose charges lie in the dual saxionic cone) independent evidence
    purpose: Realize the IDB by generating the required superpotential towers
    Already introduced in prior work [56,58]; the present paper only elevates their role via the IDB.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 55415 in / 2810 out tokens · 38589 ms · 2026-07-12T12:06:32.408398+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the symmetry structure of four-dimensional axiverse effective field theories with multiple axions coupled to abelian gauge sectors, including their extensions to broad classes of N=1 models. We identify the invertible and non-invertible generalized symmetries, and discuss the associated symmetry-breaking mechanisms together with the resulting hierarchies of energy scales. In particular, we discuss the quantum-gravitational breaking of non-invertible axion shift symmetries predicted by the existence of wormholes and the recently proposed Imaginary Distance Bound. In N=1 axiverses, these wormhole-based arguments imply that towers of BPS EFT instantons play a distinguished role and generate infinitely many superpotential terms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26004 by Daniele Licciardello, Luca Martucci.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Saxionic cone and dual saxionic cone of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The violet and orange bullets represent the set [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The bullets represent the set C EFT I of EFT instanton charges of the P 1 ,→ X → P 2 F-theory model, with twist parameter p = 2, discussed in Section 2.3. The black-encircled bullets represent the subset CWH of wormhole charges. Cf. also [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Profiles of ρ+ and ρ˜+ for k = 4. In each plot, the left branch corresponds to the lower half-wormhole and the right branch to the higher half-wormhole.. to the N = 1 supergravity action (see e.g. [126]), where gi¯ı and Ri¯ıjȷ¯ denote the metric and curvature on the moduli space, in chiral coordinates. This conclusion is compatible with the interpretation of the wormhole as encoding coarse-grained informat… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Profiles of ρ+ and ρ˜+ for k = 4. In each plot, the left branch corresponds to the lower half-wormhole and the right branch to the higher half-wormhole. These fermionic zero modes, together with the bosonic zero modes x µ ± ∈ R 4 ±, contribute to the gravitational path integral measure by a factor Z R4 + d 4x+ d 4 θ+ Z R4 − d 4x− d 4 θ− . (6.67) 41 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Profiles of ρ+ and ρ˜+ for k = 3(1 + ε), with ε = 10−4 . In each plot, the left branch corresponds to the lower half-wormhole and the right branch to the higher half-wormhole. The above observations imply that ρ˜+ and ρ−, and hence χ˜ iα˙ + and χ iα − give the most relevant contribution at long distances. Quantitatively, this can be implemented in the bilocal effective theory by integrating out the fermion… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EFT (String) Tower Building

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Assuming the Integral Scaling Relation and the Emergent String Conjecture, the Kähler potential fixes the UV tower spectrum, and every admissible degree-≤7 tower polytope is a slice of the M-theory G2 polytope.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 109 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440

  2. [2]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223

  3. [3]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279

  4. [4]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana and A. Gruzinov,Cold and fuzzy dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.85 (2000) 1158 [astro-ph/0003365]

  5. [5]

    J. A. Frieman, C. T. Hill, A. Stebbins and I. Waga,Cosmology with ultralight pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 2077 [astro-ph/9505060]

  6. [6]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory,JHEP06(2006) 051 [hep-th/0605206]

  7. [7]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530 [0905.4720]

  8. [8]

    McAllister and F

    L. McAllister and F. Quevedo,Moduli Stabilization in String Theory,2310.20559

  9. [9]

    C. W. Misner and J. A. Wheeler,Classical physics as geometry: Gravitation, electromagnetism, unquantized charge, and mass as properties of curved empty space, Annals Phys.2(1957) 525

  10. [10]

    S. W. Hawking,The Unpredictability of Quantum Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.87 (1982) 395

  11. [11]

    Banks and N

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg,Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,Phys. Rev.D83(2011) 084019 [1011.5120]

  12. [12]

    Harlow and H

    D. Harlow and H. Ooguri,Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.383(2021) 1669 [1810.05338]

  13. [13]

    Harlow, B

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,The Weak Gravity Conjecture: A Review,2201.08380

  14. [14]

    Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics,PoST ASI2022 (2024) 008 [2304.08512]

    M. Reece,TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics,PoST ASI2022 (2024) 008 [2304.08512]

  15. [15]

    Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

  16. [16]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland, Nucl.Phys.B766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

  17. [17]

    T. D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa,The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,PoST ASI2017(2017) 015 [1711.00864]

  18. [18]

    Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]. 54

  19. [19]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,2102.01111

  20. [20]

    Gra˜ na and A

    M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez,The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics,Universe7(2021) 273 [2107.00087]

  21. [21]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,2212.06187

  22. [22]

    Van Riet and G

    T. Van Riet and G. Zoccarato,Beginners lectures on flux compactifications and related Swampland topics,Phys. Rept.1049(2024) 1 [2305.01722]

  23. [23]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett,Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP02(2015) 172 [1412.5148]

  24. [24]

    Cordova, T

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator and S.-H. Shao,Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond, inSnowmass 2021, 5, 2022,2205.09545

  25. [25]

    McGreevy,Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,Ann

    J. McGreevy,Generalized Symmetries in Condensed Matter,Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.14(2023) 57 [2204.03045]

  26. [26]

    D. S. Freed,Introduction to topological symmetry in QFT.,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.107 (2024) 93 [2212.00195]

  27. [27]

    P. R. S. Gomes,An introduction to higher-form symmetries,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes74 (2023) 1 [2303.01817]

  28. [28]

    Schafer-Nameki,ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,Phys

    S. Schafer-Nameki,ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept. 1063(2024) 1 [2305.18296]

  29. [29]

    T. D. Brennan and S. Hong,Introduction to Generalized Global Symmetries in QFT and Particle Physics,2306.00912

  30. [30]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre et al.,Lectures on generalized symmetries,Phys. Rept.1051(2024) 1 [2307.07547]

  31. [31]

    Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries,2308.00747

    S.-H. Shao,What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries,2308.00747

  32. [32]

    Luo, Q.-R

    R. Luo, Q.-R. Wang and Y.-N. Wang,Lecture notes on generalized symmetries and applications,Phys. Rept.1065(2024) 1 [2307.09215]

  33. [33]

    Carqueville, M

    N. Carqueville, M. Del Zotto and I. Runkel,Topological defects, 11, 2023,2311.02449, DOI

  34. [34]

    Costa et al.,Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries, 11, 2024,2411.09082

    D. Costa et al.,Simons Lectures on Categorical Symmetries, 11, 2024,2411.09082

  35. [35]

    Rudelius and S.-H

    T. Rudelius and S.-H. Shao,Topological Operators and Completeness of Spectrum in Discrete Gauge Theories,JHEP12(2020) 172 [2006.10052]. 55

  36. [36]

    Heidenreich, J

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius and I. Valenzuela, Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum,JHEP09(2021) 203 [2104.07036]

  37. [37]

    McNamara,Gravitational Solitons and Completeness,2108.02228

    J. McNamara,Gravitational Solitons and Completeness,2108.02228

  38. [38]

    Cordova, K

    C. Cordova, K. Ohmori and T. Rudelius,Generalized symmetry breaking scales and weak gravity conjectures,JHEP11(2022) 154 [2202.05866]

  39. [39]

    J. J. Heckman, J. McNamara, M. Montero, A. Sharon, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela,Fate of stringy noninvertible symmetries,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 106001 [2402.00118]

  40. [40]

    Rudelius,A symmetry-centric perspective on the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland,Int

    T. Rudelius,A symmetry-centric perspective on the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D33(2024) 2441003 [2405.12980]

  41. [41]

    Basile, B

    I. Basile, B. Knorr, A. Platania and M. Schiffer,Asymptotic safety, quantum gravity, and the swampland: a conceptual assessment,2502.12290

  42. [42]

    Gagliano,Quantifying non-invertible chiral symmetry breaking,2508.09254

    F. Gagliano,Quantifying non-invertible chiral symmetry breaking,2508.09254

  43. [43]

    Apruzzi and L

    F. Apruzzi and L. Martucci,Gaillard-Zumino non-invertible symmetries,2510.18997

  44. [44]

    Cordova and K

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori,Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies, Phys. Rev. X13(2023) 011034 [2205.06243]

  45. [45]

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Non-invertible Gauss law and axions,JHEP09 (2023) 067 [2212.04499]

  46. [46]

    Di Ubaldo, L

    G. Di Ubaldo, L. V. Iliesiu, H. W. Lin and C. Yan,Positivity of the gravitational path integral implies the axionic weak gravity conjecture,2605.05305

  47. [47]

    Maldacena, A

    J. Maldacena, A. Maloney and B. McPeak,Wormholes and the imaginary distance bound, 2605.05336

  48. [48]

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam and S.-H. Shao,Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 161601 [2205.05086]

  49. [49]

    Yokokura,Non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics,2212.05001

    R. Yokokura,Non-invertible symmetries in axion electrodynamics,2212.05001

  50. [50]

    S. Hong, H. Kim, S. M. Lee and D. Seo,Multi-instantons, multi-axions, and non-invertible symmetries in 4d QFT,JHEP03(2026) 204 [2510.18404]

  51. [51]

    T. D. Brennan and C. Cordova,Axions, higher-groups, and emergent symmetry,JHEP 02(2022) 145 [2011.09600]

  52. [52]

    Sehayek and N

    D. Sehayek and N. Craig,Generalized symmetries and emergence in axion effective field theories,2604.11877

  53. [53]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger,Axion Induced Topology Change in Quantum Gravity and String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 890

  54. [54]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. Orgera and J. Polchinski,Euclidean wormholes in string theory, JHEP12(2007) 018 [0705.2768]. 56

  55. [55]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,Swampland Conjectures for Strings and Membranes,JHEP02(2021) 006 [2006.15154]

  56. [56]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,The EFT stringy viewpoint on large distances,JHEP09(2021) 197 [2104.05726]

  57. [57]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and I. Valenzuela,Large Field Distances from EFT strings, in21st Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity, 5, 2022,2205.04532

  58. [58]

    Martucci, N

    L. Martucci, N. Risso, A. Valenti and L. Vecchi,Wormholes in the axiverse, and the species scale,2404.14489

  59. [59]

    R. C. Myers,Higher Derivative Gravity, Surface Terms and String Theory,Phys. Rev. D 36(1987) 392

  60. [60]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

  61. [61]

    Witten,Duality and Axion Wormholes,2601.01587

    E. Witten,Duality and Axion Wormholes,2601.01587

  62. [62]

    Martucci, N

    L. Martucci, N. Risso and T. Weigand,Quantum Gravity Bounds on N=1 Effective Theories in Four Dimensions,2210.10797

  63. [63]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci and D. Sorokin,How many fluxes fit in an EFT?, JHEP10(2019) 110 [1907.11256]

  64. [64]

    Donnelly, B

    W. Donnelly, B. Michel and A. Wall,Electromagnetic Duality and Entanglement Anomalies,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 045008 [1611.05920]

  65. [65]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions for N = 1 infinite distance limits – Part I:g s obstructions,2603.12315

  66. [66]

    Kaufmann, J

    L. Kaufmann, J. Monnee, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,Quantum obstructions for N = 1 infinite distance limits – Part II: K¨ ahler obstructions,2603.13470

  67. [67]

    Del Zotto, M

    M. Del Zotto, M. Dell’Acqua and E. Riedel G˚ arding,The Higher Structure of Symmetries of Axion-Maxwell Theory,2411.09685

  68. [68]

    Hidaka, M

    Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta and R. Yokokura,Higher-form symmetries and 3-group in axion electrodynamics,Physics Letters B808(2020) 135672

  69. [69]

    Hidaka, M

    Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta and R. Yokokura,Global 3-group symmetry and ’t Hooft anomalies in axion electrodynamics,JHEP01(2021) 173 [2009.14368]

  70. [70]

    Hidaka, M

    Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta and R. Yokokura,Global 4-group symmetry and ’t Hooft anomalies in topological axion electrodynamics,PTEP2022(2022) 04A109 [2108.12564]

  71. [71]

    M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino,Duality Rotations for Interacting Fields,Nucl.Phys.B193 (1981) 221

  72. [72]

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and J. A. Harvey,Anomalies and Fermion Zero Modes on Strings and Domain Walls,Nucl. Phys. B250(1985) 427. 57

  73. [73]

    S. G. Naculich,Axionic Strings: Covariant Anomalies and Bosonization of Chiral Zero Modes,Nucl. Phys. B296(1988) 837

  74. [74]

    Fukuda and K

    H. Fukuda and K. Yonekura,Witten effect, anomaly inflow, and charge teleportation, JHEP01(2021) 119 [2010.02221]

  75. [75]

    J. Fan, K. Fraser, M. Reece and J. Stout,Axion Mass from Magnetic Monopole Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 131602 [2105.09950]

  76. [76]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,The Weak Gravity Conjecture and axion strings,JHEP11(2021) 004 [2108.11383]

  77. [77]

    Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys

    E. Witten,Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi,Phys. Lett. B86(1979) 283

  78. [78]

    C´ ordova, D

    C. C´ ordova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam and N. Seiberg,Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications I,SciPost Phys.8(2020) 001 [ 1905.09315]

  79. [79]

    C´ ordova, D

    C. C´ ordova, D. S. Freed, H. T. Lam and N. Seiberg,Anomalies in the Space of Coupling Constants and Their Dynamical Applications II,SciPost Phys.8(2020) 002 [ 1905.13361]

  80. [80]

    Jackiw,Charge and Mass Spectrum of Quantum Solitons,Conf

    R. Jackiw,Charge and Mass Spectrum of Quantum Solitons,Conf. Proc. C750926 (1975) 377

Showing first 80 references.