Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 cited by

TOPS: First-Principles Visual Token Pruning via Constructing Token Optimal Preservation Sets for Efficient MLLM Inference

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new method prunes 77.8 percent of visual tokens from MLLMs by constructing optimal preservation sets that satisfy task relevance, information coverage, and semantic diversity.

desk verdict TOPS gives a cleaner information-theoretic framing for visual token pruning and backs it with broad experiments showing near-lossless high-ratio pruning on LLaVA models. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.27161 v1 pith:MCO75XIN submitted 2026-06-25 cs.AI

Tinghao Wang , Yichen Guo , Rui Huang , Zheng Lu , Qizhe Zhang , Chenxi Li , Yuan Zhang , Jiajun Cao
show 6 more authors
Zhirong Shen Yaosong Du Guangyan Gan Wenya Wang Lin William Cong Shanghang Zhang
This is my paper
classification cs.AI
keywords visualtokenpruningmultimodallargelanguagemodelsefficientinferenceoptimalpreservationsetstaskrelevanceinformationcoveragesemanticdiversity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper formulates visual token pruning as the construction of Token Optimal Preservation Sets rather than relying on attention scores or diversity metrics alone. A top-down information-theoretic breakdown yields three guiding principles that together define which tokens to keep. The resulting training-free module is applied across multiple model sizes and benchmarks to show that most visual tokens can be discarded with no drop in multimodal task accuracy. A reader would care because current MLLMs spend heavy compute on redundant image patches, and a principled way to drop them could make inference faster without retraining.

What carries the argument

Token Optimal Preservation Sets, collections of visual tokens chosen to jointly maximize task relevance, information coverage, and semantic diversity, which serve as the explicit objective that replaces ad-hoc attention or diversity heuristics.

What would settle it

If a method using only attention scores or only diversity metrics retains the same or higher task accuracy after removing 77.8 percent of tokens on the LLaVA-NeXT 7B and 13B models, the claim that the three-principle formulation is necessary would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that effective visual token pruning requires constructing Token Optimal Preservation Sets whose selection is governed by three principles identified through information-theoretic analysis: Task Relevance to the user instruction, Information Coverage of the scene, and Semantic Diversity among kept tokens. This formulation produces the TOPS pruning module, which is training-free and model-agnostic, and which removes 77.8 percent of visual tokens on LLaVA-NeXT while retaining 100.0 percent and 100.6 percent of original performance on the 7B and 13B variants across fourteen benchmarks.

Load-bearing premise

The top-down information-theoretic analysis has correctly isolated task relevance, information coverage, and semantic diversity as the three fundamental principles that define the intrinsic goal of token pruning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On LLaVA-NeXT the method removes 77.8 percent of visual tokens while preserving full or slightly higher performance on both 7B and 13B sizes.
  • The same pruning module improves results over prior attention-based and diversity-based baselines on seven different MLLM backbones.
  • Performance is maintained or improved across fourteen separate multimodal benchmarks.
  • In some settings the removal of redundant tokens also reduces hallucination.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Redundant visual tokens may be a source of hallucination, so systematic removal could improve reliability as a side effect.
  • Future MLLM designs could embed such selection logic at the architecture level to produce smaller models from the start.
  • The three selection principles could be tested on token pruning for other modalities such as audio or video.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes TOPS, a training-free and model-agnostic visual token pruning module for MLLMs. It formulates pruning as the construction of Token Optimal Preservation Sets and derives three principles (Task Relevance, Information Coverage, Semantic Diversity) via top-down information-theoretic analysis. Experiments across 7 backbones and 14 benchmarks show TOPS outperforms prior methods; notably, on LLaVA-NeXT it prunes 77.8% of visual tokens while retaining 100.0% (7B) and 100.6% (13B) performance.

Significance. If the empirical results hold, the work supplies a principled, parameter-free pruning approach that is broadly applicable and avoids the need for task-specific retraining. The reported ability to maintain (or slightly exceed) accuracy at high pruning ratios, together with the model-agnostic design, would be a useful contribution to efficient MLLM inference and could inform future lightweight architectures.

major comments (1)
  1. [top-down information-theoretic analysis] The section presenting the top-down information-theoretic analysis: the claim that Task Relevance, Information Coverage, and Semantic Diversity are the three fundamental principles that define the intrinsic objective of token pruning would be strengthened by a concrete test (e.g., an ablation demonstrating that any proper subset of the three principles yields measurably inferior preservation sets on the reported benchmarks). Without such a test the selection of exactly these three criteria remains an assumption whose correctness risk affects the claimed first-principles status of the method.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment on the top-down analysis and for the overall positive evaluation. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section presenting the top-down information-theoretic analysis: the claim that Task Relevance, Information Coverage, and Semantic Diversity are the three fundamental principles that define the intrinsic objective of token pruning would be strengthened by a concrete test (e.g., an ablation demonstrating that any proper subset of the three principles yields measurably inferior preservation sets on the reported benchmarks). Without such a test the selection of exactly these three criteria remains an assumption whose correctness risk affects the claimed first-principles status of the method.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit ablation would strengthen the empirical grounding of the claim. The three principles were obtained deductively by decomposing the information-theoretic objective of constructing a Token Optimal Preservation Set: Task Relevance follows from conditioning on the user query, Information Coverage from maximizing mutual information with the input, and Semantic Diversity from minimizing conditional redundancy among selected tokens. Existing attention-based and diversity-based methods can be viewed as incomplete subsets of this objective, which is consistent with their comparatively weaker results in our experiments. Nevertheless, to directly respond to the concern we will add, in the revised manuscript, an ablation that evaluates preservation sets formed from all proper subsets of the three principles on the LLaVA-NeXT and other reported benchmarks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper derives its three principles (Task Relevance, Information Coverage, Semantic Diversity) via an explicit top-down information-theoretic analysis framed as first-principles reasoning, then builds the TOPS module directly from those principles. No equations or steps reduce a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter or prior self-citation by construction. The approach is described as training-free and model-agnostic, with performance claims resting on external benchmarks across 7 backbones rather than internal redefinitions. This is the normal case of a self-contained derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper relies on the assumption that the information-theoretic principles are fundamental and sufficient for effective pruning. No free parameters mentioned as it is training-free. The new entity is the conceptual framework itself.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The intrinsic objective of visual token pruning can be captured by the three principles of Task Relevance, Information Coverage, and Semantic Diversity derived from information-theoretic analysis.
    This is the core of the first-principles approach stated in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Token Optimal Preservation Sets
    purpose: To formulate the token pruning problem as selecting an optimal set of tokens.
    New concept introduced to structure the pruning method.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TOPS: First-Principles Visual Token Pruning via Constructing Token Optimal Preservation Sets for Efficient MLLM Inference." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MCO75XIN

@misc{pith2026260627161,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TOPS: First-Principles Visual Token Pruning via Constructing Token Optimal Preservation Sets for Efficient MLLM Inference},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MCO75XIN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.27161}
}
read the original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, but their efficiency is limited by the large number of visual tokens, which introduces substantial computational overhead. Visual token pruning offers a natural solution, yet existing methods are imperfect: attention-based criteria tend to retain redundant tokens, while diversity-based criteria are often agnostic to user instructions. Even methods that combine multiple criteria still lack a principled formulation of the intrinsic objective of token pruning. In this paper, we revisit visual token pruning from a first-principles perspective and formulate it as constructing Token Optimal Preservation Sets. Through a top-down information-theoretic analysis, we identify three fundamental principles for effective token selection: Task Relevance, Information Coverage, and Semantic Diversity. Based on these principles, we propose TOPS, a training-free and model-agnostic pruning module that can be applied to various MLLMs. Extensive experiments on 7 MLLM backbones and 14 benchmarks demonstrate that TOPS outperforms prior methods under diverse pruning settings. Notably, on LLaVA-NeXT, TOPS removes 77.8% of visual tokens while preserving 100.0% and 100.6% performance on its 7B and 13B models, respectively, suggesting that pruning redundant visual tokens can sometimes mitigate hallucination and inspire future lightweight MLLM design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27161 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Qualitative comparison of pruning methods. On detail-sensitive VQA questions, single-criterion pruning methods, including attention-based, diversity-based, and coverage-based methods, often fail to answer, whereas the multi-stage TOPS module helps model preserve key visual evidence and produce the correct answers. (b) Performance comparison on four mainstream MLLMs. We validate TOPS across four architectures. TO… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Logit fidelity of pruning methods across token budgets (128/64/32) on 200 MME samples. We report [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of TOPS. Left: TOPS is a plug-and-play pruning module that can be applied at multiple stages during MLLM inference. Right: at each pruning point, TOPS constructs the optimal token preservation set by greedily selecting tokens that jointly maximize task relevance, information coverage, and semantic diversity—the three criteria derived from our first-principles formulation. The two terms reflect two key prope… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hyperparameter sensitivity of α and λ. Contour plots across seven (α, λ) configurations at 64 tokens on LLaVA-1.5-7B. Star: optimal; white dots: other configurations. The optimal (α, λ) generally falls within [0.5, 1] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Robustness across token budgets. Relative performance (%) of FastV, DivPrune, SCOPE and TOPS at five budgets on LLaVA-1.5-7B. pruning method that constructs compact yet infor￾mative token subsets. Extensive experiments across multiple MLLMs and benchmarks demonstrate t…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Full hyperparameter sensitivity across all 8 benchmarks. Contour plots of per-benchmark performance across seven (α, λ) configurations at 64 tokens on LLaVA-1.5-7B. Star: optimal configuration; white dots: other tested configurations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Logit fidelity comparison across pruning methods and token budgets on 200 TextVQA samples. TOPS consistently [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Cross-layer token selection stability via mean Jaccard similarity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spatial selection frequency heatmaps for FastV, DivPrune, DART, and SCOPE ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Per-token selection probability of TOPS across three pruning stages (budget [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Qualitative comparison of visual token selections between the Vanilla model (no pruning) and TOPS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comprehensive qualitative comparison of visual token selections by FastV, DivPrune, SCOPE, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Radar charts for LLaVA-1.5-7B at three compression levels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Radar charts for LLaVA-1.5-13B at three compression levels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Radar charts for LLaVA-NeXT-7B at three compression levels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Radar charts for LLaVA-NeXT-13B at three compression levels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Radar charts for LLaVA-Video-7B at three compression levels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Radar charts for Qwen2.5-VL-7B and InternVL3-8B. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_18.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Accuracy: Auditing Spatial Provenance in Visual Token Pruning for OCR-Critical MLLM Inference

    cs.CV 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    For text-rich MLLMs, accuracy at a fixed token budget does not determine whether the surviving tokens retain spatial coverage of the OCR region that answers the query.

  2. Beyond Accuracy: Auditing Spatial Provenance in Visual Token Pruning for OCR-Critical MLLM Inference

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Same-accuracy pruned vision-language prefixes can retain very different amounts of traceable OCR support (PosECR 0.620 vs 0.270 for Target vs Random at 30% budget), so pruning evaluation should report spatial provenan...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Visual instruction tuning , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  2. [2]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    A convnet for the 2020s , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  3. [3]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , year=

    Mini-gemini: Mining the potential of multi-modality vision language models , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , year=

  4. [4]

    Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    Glm: General language model pretraining with autoregressive blank infilling , author=. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

  5. [5]

    MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models

    Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592 , year=

    work page Pith review arXiv

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages=

    Video-llava: Learning united visual representation by alignment before projection , author=. Proceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages=

    2024

  7. [7]

    Qwen Technical Report

    Qwen technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609 , year=

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 , year=

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  2. [10]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326 , year=

    Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326 , year=

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923 , year=

    Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923 , year=

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05271 , year=

    Expanding performance boundaries of open-source multimodal models with model, data, and test-time scaling , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05271 , year=

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Sharegpt4v: Improving large multi-modal models with better captions , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  6. [14]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Cogvlm: Visual expert for pretrained language models , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  7. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12966 , volume=

    Qwen-vl: A frontier large vision-language model with versatile abilities , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12966 , volume=

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Internvl: Scaling up vision foundation models and aligning for generic visual-linguistic tasks , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  9. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14178 , year=

    mplug-owl: Modularization empowers large language models with multimodality , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14178 , year=

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Science China Information Sciences , volume=

    How far are we to gpt-4v? closing the gap to commercial multimodal models with open-source suites , author=. Science China Information Sciences , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  11. [19]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  12. [20]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 , year=

    Gpt-4o system card , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 , year=

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05530 , year=

    Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05530 , year=

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    OpenAI blog , volume=

    Language models are unsupervised multitask learners , author=. OpenAI blog , volume=

  15. [23]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 , year=

    Gpt-4 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 , year=

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02954 , year=

    Deepseek llm: Scaling open-source language models with longtermism , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02954 , year=

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 , year=

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 , year=

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288 , year=

    Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288 , year=

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17297 , year=

    Internlm2 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17297 , year=

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03277 , year=

    Instruction tuning with gpt-4 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03277 , year=

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Language models are few-shot learners , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  22. [30]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2021 , organization=

    2021

  23. [31]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Beyond text-visual attention: Exploiting visual cues for effective token pruning in vlms , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  24. [32]

    SparseVLM+: Visual Token Sparsification with Improved Text-Visual Attention Pattern , author=

  25. [33]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14125 , year=

    Videopoet: A large language model for zero-shot video generation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14125 , year=

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , pages=

    Deepspeed: System optimizations enable training deep learning models with over 100 billion parameters , author=. Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , pages=

  27. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11549 , year=

    Similarity-aware token pruning: Your vlm but faster , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11549 , year=

  28. [36]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09461 , year=

    Token merging: Your vit but faster , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09461 , year=

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Aim: Adaptive inference of multi-modal llms via token merging and pruning , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  30. [38]

    , author=

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. , author=. Iclr , volume=

  31. [39]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  32. [40]

    Llavanext: Improved reasoning, ocr, and world knowledge , author=

  33. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02713 , year=

    Llava-video: Video instruction tuning with synthetic data , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02713 , year=

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10479 , year=

    Internvl3: Exploring advanced training and test-time recipes for open-source multimodal models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10479 , year=

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    An image is worth 1/2 tokens after layer 2: Plug-and-play inference acceleration for large vision-language models , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  36. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17247 , year=

    Pyramiddrop: Accelerating your large vision-language models via pyramid visual redundancy reduction , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17247 , year=

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Divprune: Diversity-based visual token pruning for large multimodal models , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  38. [46]

    Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    Stop Looking for Important Tokens in Multimodal Language Models: Duplication Matters More , author=. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    2025

  39. [47]

    Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics , pages=

    Less is more: A simple yet effective token reduction method for efficient multi-modal llms , author=. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics , pages=

  40. [48]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Llava-prumerge: Adaptive token reduction for efficient large multimodal models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

  41. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24214 , year=

    SCOPE: Saliency-Coverage Oriented Token Pruning for Efficient Multimodel LLMs , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24214 , year=

  42. [50]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04417 , year=

    Sparsevlm: Visual token sparsification for efficient vision-language model inference , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04417 , year=

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Visionzip: Longer is better but not necessary in vision language models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  44. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10803 , year=

    Multi-stage vision token dropping: Towards efficient multimodal large language model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10803 , year=

  45. [53]

    Visual Intelligence , volume=

    Efficient multimodal large language models: A survey , author=. Visual Intelligence , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  46. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01236 , year=

    AgilePruner: An empirical study of attention and diversity for adaptive visual token pruning in large vision-language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01236 , year=

  47. [55]

    arXiv e-prints , pages=

    Towards adaptive visual token pruning for large multimodal models , author=. arXiv e-prints , pages=

  48. [56]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13315 , year=

    IDPruner: Harmonizing Importance and Diversity in Visual Token Pruning for MLLMs , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13315 , year=

  49. [57]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.17196 , year=

    EntropyPrune: Matrix Entropy Guided Visual Token Pruning for Multimodal Large Language Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.17196 , year=

  50. [58]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10967 , year=

    Beyond attention or similarity: Maximizing conditional diversity for token pruning in mllms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10967 , year=

  51. [59]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22654 , year=

    Vscan: Rethinking visual token reduction for efficient large vision-language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22654 , year=

  52. [60]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Gqa: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  53. [61]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  54. [62]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Towards vqa models that can read , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  55. [63]

    Proceedings of the 2023 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages=

    Evaluating object hallucination in large vision-language models , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages=

    2023

  56. [64]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13394 , year=

    Mme: A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for multimodal large language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13394 , year=

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    European conference on computer vision , pages=

    Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player? , author=. European conference on computer vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  58. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02490 , year=

    Mm-vet: Evaluating large multimodal models for integrated capabilities , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02490 , year=

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Are we on the right way for evaluating large vision-language models? , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  60. [68]

    European conference on computer vision , pages=

    A diagram is worth a dozen images , author=. European conference on computer vision , pages=. 2016 , organization=

    2016

  61. [69]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Hallusionbench: an advanced diagnostic suite for entangled language hallucination and visual illusion in large vision-language models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  62. [70]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Video-mme: The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of multi-modal llms in video analysis , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  63. [71]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Longvideobench: A benchmark for long-context interleaved video-language understanding , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  64. [72]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

    Mlvu: Benchmarking multi-task long video understanding , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

  65. [73]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Fastdrivevla: Efficient end-to-end driving via plug-and-play reconstruction-based token pruning , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  66. [74]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 , year=

    The llama 3 herd of models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 , year=

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03267 , year=

    Openai gpt-5 system card , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03267 , year=

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    5-omni technical report , author=

    Qwen3. 5-omni technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.15804 , year=

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 , year=

    Qwen3 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 , year=

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07491 , year=

    Kimi-vl technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07491 , year=

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    5: Visual Agentic Intelligence , author=

    Kimi K2. 5: Visual Agentic Intelligence , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02276 , year=

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261 , year=

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06261 , year=

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15115 , year=

    Qwen2.5 Technical Report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15115 , year=

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631 , year=

    Qwen3-vl technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631 , year=

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21307 , year=

    Internvl-x: Advancing and accelerating internvl series with efficient visual token compression , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21307 , year=

  76. [84]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Dynamicvit: Efficient vision transformers with dynamic token sparsification , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  77. [85]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07800 , year=

    Not all patches are what you need: Expediting vision transformers via token reorganizations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07800 , year=

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.