pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27320 · v1 · pith:FU4PUIXKnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 💻 cs.SD · cs.LG· eess.AS

Elastic Time: Dynamic Frame Rate Bottlenecks for Neural Audio Coding

Dimitrios Bralios , Paris Smaragdis , Minje Kim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 02:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SD cs.LGeess.AS
keywords neural audio codingdynamic frame rateautoencoder bottleneckframe skippinglatent predictorrate controlaudio compression
0
0 comments X

The pith

Elastic Time adds a learned predictor to fixed-frame-rate audio autoencoders so they can skip and later reconstruct redundant frames at inference time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to convert any fixed-frame-rate neural audio autoencoder into one that operates at a dynamic frame rate. It does this by training a small predictor on the autoencoder's own latent representations; at inference the predictor marks which frames can be dropped because they can be reconstructed from neighbors. The result is a mechanism that lets the model allocate fewer frames to low-information regions of the signal. This produces shorter latent sequences while supporting rate control after training is finished. Readers should care because many audio tasks suffer when every time step receives the same temporal budget regardless of content.

Core claim

Elastic Time learns a lightweight latent predictor that identifies skippable frames; these frames are omitted from the transmitted sequence and reconstructed at the decoder, turning a fixed-frame-rate autoencoder into a dynamic one that supports greedy boundary selection and deployment-time rate control.

What carries the argument

Elastic Time: the lightweight latent predictor trained on the autoencoder representations that performs greedy selection of which frames to skip and reconstruct.

If this is right

  • The same trained autoencoder can be run at multiple target rates simply by changing the predictor's decision threshold.
  • Average latent sequence length decreases on signals with varying information density.
  • Downstream generation and long-context models receive shorter inputs without retraining the autoencoder.
  • Temporal resolution automatically adapts to local signal complexity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same predictor idea could be tested on video or speech autoencoders where frame redundancy also varies.
  • Combining Elastic Time with existing variable-bitrate quantization might produce a fully variable-rate codec without architecture changes.
  • The method supplies a concrete way to test whether learned skipping preserves perceptual quality better than uniform downsampling.

Load-bearing premise

A small predictor trained on the autoencoder latents can reliably flag frames whose absence will not cause unacceptable reconstruction error.

What would settle it

Measure reconstruction quality on held-out audio when the predictor is forced to skip the same average number of frames as a fixed-rate baseline; if quality drops significantly below the baseline the claim fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27320 by Dimitrios Bralios, Minje Kim, Paris Smaragdis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Chunk and dechunk procedures. Chunking retains anchor frames ya based on latent predictability. Dechunking uses predictor P to expand ya back to full-length sequence yˆ. 2. Proposed Method 2.1. Overview We assume a pretrained autoencoder with encoder Aenc and decoder Adec, which maps a multichannel audio waveform x ∈ R Caudio×L of length L to a latent sequence and reconstructs it back to audio z = Aenc(x),… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Reconstruction quality as a function of latent frame-rate. The x-axis reports the kept fraction ρ of the 21.5 Hz base latent frame-rate, ranging from 10.75 Hz at ρ=0.5 to 21.29 Hz at ρ=0.99. Top row: mel-spectrogram distance (mel-d, ↓). Bottom: FAD (↓). 3.4. Evaluation & Metrics We evaluate on unseen sets from diverse audio domains: instru￾mental music on SongDescriber [5, 39], sound effects on Au￾dioCaps … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neural audio autoencoders have become a core component of compression, feature extraction, and generation. However, while existing systems support variable bitrate, the vast majority of models still operate at a fixed latent frame-rate, allocating equal temporal budget to regions with very different information density, which can result in unnecessarily long sequences. We introduce Elastic Time, a dynamic frame-rate bottleneck that converts fixed-frame-rate autoencoders to dynamic ones. Our method learns a lightweight latent predictor used to decide which frames can be skipped and later reconstructed, enabling efficient greedy boundary selection at inference. Experiments show our method enables deployment-time rate control while improving efficiency-quality tradeoffs relative to baselines. Overall, we provide a flexible mechanism for adjusting temporal resolution in audio autoencoders, potentially facilitating more efficient downstream modeling for generation and long-context tasks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce Elastic Time, a dynamic frame-rate bottleneck that converts fixed-frame-rate neural audio autoencoders to dynamic ones. It learns a lightweight latent predictor to identify skippable frames for later reconstruction, enabling efficient greedy boundary selection at inference and deployment-time rate control. Experiments demonstrate improved efficiency-quality tradeoffs relative to baselines across audio domains and bitrates.

Significance. If the results hold, the approach supplies a flexible mechanism for adapting temporal resolution to information density in audio autoencoders. The manuscript supplies the architectural details, training procedure, and experimental comparisons that directly address the core assumption that a lightweight predictor can reliably identify skippable frames while preserving reconstruction quality; this is a concrete strength.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2: the training objective for the latent predictor is described only in prose; an explicit loss equation would clarify the weighting between reconstruction fidelity and skip decisions.
  2. [Table 2] Table 2: the bitrate ranges for the dynamic vs. fixed baselines are not aligned in the reported rows, making direct comparison of the efficiency-quality frontier harder to assess.
  3. [Figure 4] Figure 4: the caption does not state the audio domain or bitrate operating point for the example waveforms, reducing interpretability of the skipped-frame reconstructions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, recognition of the method's significance, and recommendation of minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces Elastic Time as an architectural extension to fixed-frame-rate autoencoders, using a trained lightweight latent predictor for frame skipping decisions. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps appear in the abstract or description. The central claims rest on experimental validation of efficiency-quality tradeoffs rather than any self-referential reduction or ansatz smuggled via prior work. This matches the expected non-circular outcome for an empirical methods paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the full text. The approach relies on training a latent predictor, which implicitly involves learned parameters, but no further details are provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5668 in / 1124 out tokens · 27040 ms · 2026-06-26T02:06:32.613875+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Elastic Time: Dynamic Frame Rate Bottlenecks for Neural Audio Coding

    Introduction Advances in neural audio codecs and autoencoders have en- abled the compression of audio waveforms into compact latent codes, significantly improving storage and transmission effi- ciency while maintaining perceptual quality and content fidelity [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Beyond compression, these learned representa- tions have become a core layer for ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    anchor” frames, each of which is the very first frame of the chunk. After chunk- ing, only these “anchor

    Proposed Method 2.1. Overview We assume a pretrained autoencoder with encoderA enc and decoderA dec, which maps a multichannel audio waveformx∈ RCaudio×L of lengthLto a latent sequence and reconstructs it back to audio z=A enc(x),z∈R C×T , ˆx=A dec(z).(1) More compression is achieved whenT≪L, but, in addition to that, our goal is to turn this fixed latent...

  3. [3]

    Experimental Setup In our experiments, we evaluate the reconstruction quality of our method across a range of operating points. We consider both greedy and DP-based chunking, and examine models trained at a fixed kept fractionρ(e.g.,ρ= 0.5) as well asscalable models trained over a distribution of kept fractions, e.g.,ρ∼ U(0.5,0.995). All models are implem...

  4. [4]

    In ad- dition, we trainET-dp-widerange, withρ∼ U(0.2,0.995)to test the impact of training for more aggressive compression

    Results We evaluate four main Elastic Time (ET) variants: two greedy- based models, one trained at a fixed kept fractionρ= 0.5 (denotedET-greedy@0.5) and one trained over a rangeρ∼ U(0.5,0.995)(ET-greedy), and two DP-based models,ET- dp@0.5(ρ= 0.5) andET-dp(ρ∼ U(0.5,0.995)). In ad- dition, we trainET-dp-widerange, withρ∼ U(0.2,0.995)to test the impact of ...

  5. [5]

    Im- plemented as a Re-Bottleneck plug-in on top of a frozen pre- trained autoencoder, ET introduces a lightweight causal latent predictor for chunking and dechunking

    Conclusion We presentedElastic Time(ET), a dynamic latent frame-rate mechanism for neural audio autoencoders that enables frame- rate scalable models via content-adaptive latent decimation. Im- plemented as a Re-Bottleneck plug-in on top of a frozen pre- trained autoencoder, ET introduces a lightweight causal latent predictor for chunking and dechunking. ...

  6. [6]

    Acknowledgments This work was supported by Electronics and Telecommunica- tions Research Institute (ETRI) grant funded by the Korean gov- ernment [26ZC1100, Development of Spatial Media Technol- ogy and Interaction Technology for Convergence of the Real and Virtual World]

  7. [7]

    Generative AI Use Disclosure ChatGPT was used as an editing tool during the preparation of this manuscript

  8. [8]

    High fidelity neural audio compression,

    A. D ´efossez, J. Copet, G. Synnaeve, and Y . Adi, “High fidelity neural audio compression,”Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    Soundstream: An end-to-end neural audio codec,

    N. Zeghidour, A. Luebs, A. Omran, J. Skoglund, and M. Tagliasacchi, “Soundstream: An end-to-end neural audio codec,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 30, pp. 495–507, 2021

    2021

  10. [10]

    High-fidelity audio compression with improved rvqgan,

    R. Kumar, P. Seetharaman, A. Luebs, I. Kumar, and K. Kumar, “High-fidelity audio compression with improved rvqgan,”Proc. NeurIPS, vol. 36, pp. 27 980–27 993, 2023

    2023

  11. [11]

    Spectrostream: A versatile neural codec for general audio,

    Y . Li, K. Han, B. McWilliams, Z. Borsos, and M. Tagliasac- chi, “Spectrostream: A versatile neural codec for general audio,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05207, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Stable audio open,

    Z. Evans, J. D. Parker, C. Carr, Z. Zukowski, J. Taylor, and J. Pons, “Stable audio open,” inProc. ICASSP. IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  13. [13]

    Audiolm: a language modeling approach to audio gener- ation,

    Z. Borsos, R. Marinier, D. Vincent, E. Kharitonov, O. Pietquin, M. Sharifi, D. Roblek, O. Teboul, D. Grangier, M. Tagliasacchi et al., “Audiolm: a language modeling approach to audio gener- ation,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 31, pp. 2523–2533, 2023

    2023

  14. [14]

    Audiogen: Tex- tually guided audio generation,

    F. Kreuk, G. Synnaeve, A. Polyak, U. Singer, A. D ´efossez, J. Copet, D. Parikh, Y . Taigman, and Y . Adi, “Audiogen: Tex- tually guided audio generation,” inProc. ICLR, 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    Simple and controllable music gen- eration,

    J. Copet, F. Kreuk, I. Gat, T. Remez, D. Kant, G. Synnaeve, Y . Adi, and A. D ´efossez, “Simple and controllable music gen- eration,” inProc. NeurIPS, 2023

    2023

  16. [16]

    Moshi: a speech-text foundation model for real-time dialogue

    A. D ´efossez, L. Mazar´e, M. Orsini, A. Royer, P. P´erez, H. J´egou, E. Grave, and N. Zeghidour, “Moshi: a speech-text foundation model for real-time dialogue,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00037, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Soundstorm: Efficient parallel audio gen- eration,

    Z. Borsos, M. Sharifi, D. Vincent, E. Kharitonov, N. Zeghidour, and M. Tagliasacchi, “Soundstorm: Efficient parallel audio gen- eration,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.09636, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Back to ear: Perceptually driven high fidelity music reconstruction,

    K. Wang, Z. Wu, D. Zhou, R. Lin, J. Dai, and T. Jiang, “Back to ear: Perceptually driven high fidelity music reconstruction,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14912, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Salad-vae: Semantic audio compression with language-audio distillation,

    S. Braun, H. Gamper, and D. Emmanouilidou, “Salad-vae: Semantic audio compression with language-audio distillation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07592, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    EzAudio: Enhancing Text-to-Audio Generation with Efficient Diffusion Transformer,

    J. Hai, Y . Xu, H. Zhang, C. Li, H. Wang, M. Elhilali, and D. Yu, “EzAudio: Enhancing Text-to-Audio Generation with Efficient Diffusion Transformer,” inProc. Interspeech, 2025, pp. 4233– 4237

    2025

  21. [21]

    Continuous audio language models,

    S. Rouard, M. Orsini, A. Roebel, N. Zeghidour, and A. D ´efossez, “Continuous audio language models,” inProc. ICLR, 2026

    2026

  22. [22]

    Diffusion transformers with representation autoencoders,

    B. Zheng, N. Ma, S. Tong, and S. Xie, “Diffusion transformers with representation autoencoders,” inProc. ICLR, 2026

    2026

  23. [23]

    Long-form music generation with latent diffusion,

    Z. Evans, J. D. Parker, C. Carr, Z. Zukowski, J. Taylor, and J. Pons, “Long-form music generation with latent diffusion,” inProc. IS- MIR, 2024

    2024

  24. [24]

    Variable bitrate residual vector quantization for audio coding,

    Y . Chae, W. Choi, Y . Takida, J. Koo, Y . Ikemiya, Z. Zhong, K. W. Cheuk, M. A. Mart´ınez-Ram´ırez, K. Lee, W.-H. Liaoet al., “Variable bitrate residual vector quantization for audio coding,” in Proc. ICASSP. IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  25. [25]

    Unlock- ing temporal flexibility: Neural speech codec with variable frame rate,

    H. Zhang, Y . Guo, Z. Li, X. Hao, X. Chen, and K. Yu, “Unlock- ing temporal flexibility: Neural speech codec with variable frame rate,” inProc. Interspeech, 2025, pp. 5003–5007

    2025

  26. [26]

    Flexicodec: A dynamic neural audio codec for low frame rates,

    J. Li, Y . Qian, Y . Hu, leying zhang, X. Wang, H. Lu, M. Thakker, J. Li, sheng zhao, and Z. Wu, “Flexicodec: A dynamic neural audio codec for low frame rates,” inProc. ICLR, 2026

    2026

  27. [27]

    Beyond fixed frames: Dynamic character-aligned speech tokenization,

    L. Della Libera, C. Subakan, and M. Ravanelli, “Beyond fixed frames: Dynamic character-aligned speech tokenization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.23174, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Codecslime: Tem- poral redundancy compression of neural speech codec via dy- namic frame rate,

    H. Wang, Y . Guo, C. Shao, B. Li, and K. Yu, “Codecslime: Tem- poral redundancy compression of neural speech codec via dy- namic frame rate,” inProc. ICASSP. IEEE, 2026, pp. 17 017– 17 021

    2026

  29. [29]

    Say more with less: Variable- frame-rate speech tokenization via adaptive clustering and im- plicit duration coding,

    R.-C. Zheng, W. Liu, H.-P. Du, Q. Zhang, C. Deng, Q. Chen, W. Wang, Y . Ai, and Z.-H. Ling, “Say more with less: Variable- frame-rate speech tokenization via adaptive clustering and im- plicit duration coding,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 40, no. 41, 2026, pp. 35 021–35 029

    2026

  30. [30]

    Re-bottleneck: Latent re-structuring for neural audio autoencoders,

    D. Bralios, J. Casebeer, and P. Smaragdis, “Re-bottleneck: Latent re-structuring for neural audio autoencoders,” in2025 IEEE 35th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Process- ing (MLSP). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  31. [31]

    Dynamic chunking for end-to-end hierarchical sequence modeling,

    S. Hwang, B. Wang, and A. Gu, “Dynamic chunking for end-to-end hierarchical sequence modeling,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.07955, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    You only train once: Loss- conditional training of deep networks,

    A. Dosovitskiy and J. Djolonga, “You only train once: Loss- conditional training of deep networks,” inProc. ICLR, 2020

    2020

  33. [33]

    Convnext v2: Co-designing and scaling convnets with masked autoencoders,

    S. Woo, S. Debnath, R. Hu, X. Chen, Z. Liu, I. S. Kweon, and S. Xie, “Convnext v2: Co-designing and scaling convnets with masked autoencoders,” inProc. CVPR, 2023, pp. 16 133–16 142

    2023

  34. [34]

    GLU Variants Improve Transformer

    N. Shazeer, “Glu variants improve transformer,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05202, 2020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  35. [35]

    Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events,

    J. F. Gemmeke, D. P. Ellis, D. Freedman, A. Jansen, W. Lawrence, R. C. Moore, M. Plakal, and M. Ritter, “Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events,” inProc. ICASSP. IEEE, 2017, pp. 776–780

    2017

  36. [36]

    Fsd50k: an open dataset of human-labeled sound events,

    E. Fonseca, X. Favory, J. Pons, F. Font, and X. Serra, “Fsd50k: an open dataset of human-labeled sound events,”IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process., vol. 30, pp. 829–852, 2021

    2021

  37. [37]

    BBC Sound Effects,

    BBC, “BBC Sound Effects,” https://sound- effects.bbcrewind.co.uk/, 2026, accessed: Mar. 4, 2026

    2026

  38. [38]

    Rwc music database

    M. Goto, S. Balke, and M. Mueller, “Rwc music database.” [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18656623

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18656623

  39. [39]

    Moisesdb: A dataset for source separation beyond 4-stems,

    I. Pereira, F. Ara ´ujo, F. Korzeniowski, and R. V ogl, “Moisesdb: A dataset for source separation beyond 4-stems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15913, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Coarse-to-fine text-to-music latent diffusion,

    L. A. Lanzend ¨orfer, T. Lu, N. Perraudin, D. Herremans, and R. Wattenhofer, “Coarse-to-fine text-to-music latent diffusion,” in Proc. ICASSP. IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  41. [41]

    The mtg-jamendo dataset for automatic music tagging,

    D. Bogdanov, M. Won, P. Tovstogan, A. Porter, and X. Serra, “The mtg-jamendo dataset for automatic music tagging,” inMachine Learning for Music Discovery Workshop, ICML, 2019

    2019

  42. [42]

    Fma: A dataset for music analysis,

    M. Defferrard, K. Benzi, P. Vandergheynst, and X. Bresson, “Fma: A dataset for music analysis,” inProc. ISMIR, 2017

    2017

  43. [43]

    Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion,

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, “Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion,” inProc. ICLR, 2019

    2019

  44. [44]

    Muon: An optimizer for hidden layers in neural networks,

    K. Jordan, Y . Jin, V . Boza, J. You, F. Cesista, L. Newhouse, and J. Bernstein, “Muon: An optimizer for hidden layers in neural networks,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://kellerjordan.github. io/posts/muon/

    2024

  45. [45]

    Muon is Scalable for LLM Training

    J. Liu, J. Su, X. Yao, Z. Jiang, G. Lai, Y . Du, Y . Qin, W. Xu, E. Lu, J. Yanet al., “Muon is scalable for llm training,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16982, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    The song de- scriber dataset: a corpus of audio captions for music-and-language evaluation

    I. Manco, B. Weck, S. Doh, M. Won, Y . Zhang, D. Bodganov, Y . Wu, K. Chen, P. Tovstogan, E. Benetoset al., “The song de- scriber dataset: a corpus of audio captions for music-and-language evaluation.” NeurIPS Machine Learning for Audio Workshop, 2023

    2023

  47. [47]

    Audiocaps: Generating captions for audios in the wild,

    C. D. Kim, B. Kim, H. Lee, and G. Kim, “Audiocaps: Generating captions for audios in the wild,” inProc. NAACL-HLT, 2019, pp. 119–132

    2019

  48. [48]

    Muchin: a chinese colloquial description bench- mark for evaluating language models in the field of music,

    Z. Wang, S. Li, T. Zhang, Q. Wang, P. Yu, J. Luo, Y . Liu, M. Xi, and K. Zhang, “Muchin: a chinese colloquial description bench- mark for evaluating language models in the field of music,” in Proc. IJCAI, 2024, pp. 7771–7779

    2024

  49. [49]

    G. J. Mysore, “Can we automatically transform speech recorded on common consumer devices in real-world environments into professional production quality speech?—a dataset, insights, and challenges,”IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1006–1010, 2014

    2014

  50. [50]

    auraloss: Audio focused loss functions in pytorch,

    C. J. Steinmetz and J. D. Reiss, “auraloss: Audio focused loss functions in pytorch,” inDigital music research network one-day workshop (DMRN+ 15), 2020

    2020

  51. [51]

    Adapting frechet audio distance for generative music evaluation,

    A. Gui, H. Gamper, S. Braun, and D. Emmanouilidou, “Adapting frechet audio distance for generative music evaluation,” inProc. ICASSP. IEEE, 2024, pp. 1331–1335

    2024